Bio

JONATHAN TURLEY
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

unnamed-1Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, University of Chicago, and other schools.

After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history. In addition to his extensive publications, Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers, military personnel, judges, members of Congress, and a wide range of other clients. He is also one of the few attorneys to successfully challenge both a federal and a state law — leading to courts striking down the federal Elizabeth Morgan law as well as the state criminalization of cohabitation.

In 2010, Professor Turley represented Judge G. Thomas Porteous in his impeachment trial. After a trial before the Senate, Professor Turley (on December 7, 2010) argued both the motions and gave the final argument to all 100 U.S. Senators from the well of the Senate floor — only the 14th time in history of the country that such a trial of a judge has reached the Senate floor. Judge Porteous was convicted of four articles of impeachments, including the acceptance of $2000 from an attorney and using a false name on a bankruptcy filing.

In 2011, Professor Turley filed a challenge to the Libyan War on behalf of ten members of Congress, including Representatives Roscoe Bartlett (R., Md); Dan Burton (R., Ind.); Mike Capuano (D., Mass.); Howard Coble (R., N.C.); John Conyers (D., Mich.); John J. Duncan (R., Tenn.); Tim Johnson (R., Ill.); Walter Jones (R., N.C.); Dennis Kucinich (D., Ohio); and Ron Paul (R., Tx). The lawsuit was before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Turley-600x287In November 2014, Turley agreed to serve as lead counsel to the United States House of Representatives in its constitutional challenge to changes ordered by President Obama to the Affordable Care Act. The litigation was approved by the House of Representatives to seek judicial review of the claims under the separation of powers. On May 12, 2016, the federal court handed down a historic victory for the House and ruled that the Obama Administration violated the separation of powers in ordering billions to be paid to insurance companies without an appropriation of Congress.

Other cases include his representation of the Area 51 workers at a secret air base in Nevada; the nuclear couriers at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; the Rocky Flats grand jury in Colorado; Dr. Eric Foretich, the husband in the famous Elizabeth Morgan custody controversy; and four former United States Attorneys General during the Clinton impeachment litigation. In the Foretich case, Turley succeeded recently in reversing a trial court and striking down a federal statute through a rare “bill of attainder” challenge. Professor Turley has also served as counsel in a variety of national security cases, including espionage cases like that of Jim Nicholson, the highest ranking CIA officer ever accused of espionage. Turley also served as lead defense counsel in the successful defense of Petty Officer Daniel King, who faced the death penalty for alleged spying for Russia. Turley also served as defense counsel in the case of Dr. Tom Butler, who is faced criminal charges dealing with the importation and handling of thirty vials of plague in Texas. He also served as counsel to Larry Hanauer, the House Intelligence Committee staffer accused of leaking a classified Presidential National Intelligence Estimate to the New York Times. (Hanauer was cleared of all allegations).

05282015_6695Among his current cases, Professor Turley represents Dr. Ali Al-Timimi, who was convicted in Virginia in 2005 of violent speech against the United States. In 2020, the federal court found that there merit in the challenges raised by Professor Turley and his co-counsel Tom Huff. Accordingly, the judge ordered his release to protect him from Covit-19 while the Court prepared a decision on the challenges. Pursuant to a court order, Dr. Al-Timimi was released from the Supermax in Colorado and the two drove across the country so that he could be placed into home confinement.  He also represented Dr. Sami Al-Arian, who was accused of being the American leader of a terrorist organization while he was a university professor in Florida. Turley represented Dr. Al-Arian for eight years, much of which was in a determined defense against an indictment for criminal contempt. The case centered on the alleged violation of a plea bargain by the Justice Department after Dr. Al-Arian was largely exonerated of terrorism charges in Tampa, Florida. On June 27, 2014, all charges were dropped against Dr. Al-Arian. He also represented pilots approaching or over the age of 60 in their challenge to the mandatory retirement age of the FAA. He also represented David Murphee Faulk, the whistleblower who disclosed abuses in the surveillance operations at NSA’s Fort Gordon facility in Georgia.

Professor Turley also agreed to serve as lead counsel representing the Brown family from the TLC “Sister Wives, a reality show on plural marriage or polygamy. On December 13, 2013, the federal court in Utah struck down the criminalization of polygamy — the first such decision in history — on free exercise and due process grounds. On September 26, 2014, the court also ruled in favor of the Browns under Section 1983 — giving them a clean sweep on all of the statutory and constitutional claims.  In April 2015, a panel reversed the decision on standing grounds and that decision is now on appeal.

Professor Turley was also lead counsel in the World Bank protest case stemming from the mass arrest of people in 2002 by the federal and district governments during demonstrations of the IMF and World Bank.  Turley and his co-lead counsel Dan Schwartz (and the law firm of Bryan Cave) were the first to file and represented student journalists arrested without probable cause.  In April 2015, after 13 years of intense litigation, the case was settled for $2.8 million, including $115,000 for each arrestee — a record damage award in a case of this kind and over twice the amount of prior damages for individual protesters.  The case also exposed government destruction and withholding of evidence as well as the admitted mass arrest of hundreds of people without probable cause.

Professor Turley also served as the legal expert in the review of polygamy laws in the British of Columbia (Canada) Supreme Court. In the latter case, he argued for the decriminalization of plural union and conjugal unions. In 2012, Turley also represented the makers of “Five Wives Vodka” (Ogden’s Own Distillery) in challenging an effective ban on the product in Idaho after officials declared the product to be offensive to Mormons. After opposing to the ban on free speech and other grounds, the state of Idaho issued a letter apologizing for public statements made by officials and lifting the ban on sale for “Five Wives Vodka.”

Turley has served as a consultant on homeland security and constitutional issues, including the Florida House of Representatives. He also served as the consultant to the Puerto Rico House of Representatives on the impeachment of Gov. Aníbal Acevedo Vilá.

05282015_6655Professor Turley is a frequent witness before the House and Senate on constitutional and statutory issues as well as tort reform legislation. That testimony includes the confirmation hearings of Attorney General nominees Loretta Lynch and William Barr as well as Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.  Professor Turley is also a nationally recognized legal commentator. Professor Turley was ranked as 38th in the top 100 most cited “public intellectuals” in the recent study by Judge Richard Posner. Turley was also found to be the second most cited law professor in the country. He has been repeatedly ranked in the nation’s top 500 lawyers in annual surveys (including in the latest rankings by LawDragon) – one of only a handful of academics. In prior years, he was ranked as one of the nation’s top ten lawyers in military law cases as well as one of the top 40 lawyers under 40. He was also selected in the last five years as one of the 100 top Irish lawyers in the world.  In 2016, he was ranked as one of the 100 most famous (past and present) law professors.

694940094001_6113691487001_6113685625001-vsProfessor Turley is one of only two academics to testify at both the Clinton and Trump impeachment hearings. In December 2019, Professor Turley was called as the one Republican witness in the House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearings.  He appeared with three Democratic witnesses.  Professor Turley disagreed with this fellow witnesses in opposing the proposed articles of impeachments on bribery, extortion, campaign finance violations or obstruction of justice. He argued that these alleged impeachable acts were at odds with controlling definitions of those crimes and that Congress has historically looked to the criminal code and cases for guidance on such allegations.  The committee ultimately rejected those articles and adopted the only two articles that Professor Turley said could be legitimately advanced: abuse of power, obstruction of Congress. Chairman Jerrold Nadler even ended the hearing by quoting his position on abuse of power. However, Turley  opposed impeachment on this record as incomplete and insufficient for submission to the Senate. He argued for the House to wait and complete the record by seeking to compel key witnesses like former National Security Adviser John Bolton.  His testimony was later relied upon in the impeachment floor debate by various House members and he was cited by both the White House and House managers in their arguments before the United States Senate in the Trump impeachment trial, including videotaped remarks played at the trial.

download-2Professor Turley’s articles on legal and policy issues appear regularly in national publications with hundreds of articles in such newspapers as the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal. He is a columnist for USA Today and writes regularly for the Washington Post. In 2005, Turley was given the Columnist of the Year award for Single-Issue Advocacy for his columns on civil liberties by the Aspen Institute and the Week Magazine. Professor Turley also appears regularly as a legal expert on all of the major television networks. Since the 1990s, he has worked under contract as the on-air Legal Analyst for NBC News, CBS News, BBC and Fox News.  Professor Turley has been a repeated guest on Sunday talk shows with over two-dozen appearances on Meet the Press, ABC This Week, Face the Nation, and Fox Sunday. Professor Turley has taught courses on constitutional law, constitutional criminal law, environmental law, litigation, and torts. He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Older Prisoners (POPS). His work with older prisoners has been honored in various states, including his selection as the 2011 recipient of the Dr. Mary Ann Quaranta Elder Justice Award at Fordham University.

His award-winning blog is routinely ranked as one of the most popular legal blogs by AVVO. His blog was selected as the top News/Analysis site in 2013, the top Legal Opinion Blog in 2011 as well as prior selections as the top Law Professor Blog and Legal Theory Blog. It was also ranked in the top 20 constitutional law blog in 2018.  It has been regularly ranked by the ABA Journal in the top 100 blogs in the world. In 2012, Turley has selected as one of the top 20 legal experts on Twitter by Business Insider. In 2013, the ABA Journal inducted the Turley Blog into its Hall of Fame.

Professor Turley received his B.A. at the University of Chicago and his J.D. at Northwestern. In 2008, he was given an honorary Doctorate of Law from John Marshall Law School for his contributions to civil liberties and the public interest.

For further information: Mr. Seth Tate – 202-994-0537

Icon made by DinosoftLabs from Flaticon

1,553 thoughts on “Bio”

  1. Mary; I wouldn’t bother addressing the likes of dundar; I’m guessing the only car he’s ever been in is a Police car. Automatic transmissions have become so sophisticated, that there are now little fuel savings for many manuals over their automatic counterparts. Even some sports cars come with auto. My wife drives the auto, and I drive the stick – most German cars now have available Tiptronic (auto and manual in one transmission). I only feel like I’m DRIVING when I’m in a stick, otherwise I feel like I’m just RIDING.

    I moved out when I started university and bought my first house a few years after graduating. Unfortunately, thanks in large part to Bush, many TWO income families can no longer afford a house, let alone single people just starting out. Ironically, now is the time to buy in the States, but when people are worried about keping their jobs, the value of their current properties falling and interest rates climbing, not too many people can afford it (unless you’re Romney or Cindy McCain). If not for Bush and his occupation of Iraq, I would have purchased at least one property in the US by now. If mortgage rates are around 6% during a second Obama term, I’ll be buying that property.

  2. dundar:

    If my son is paying for it, he can drive whatever he likes. I prefer automatic transmission myself; even though I learned on a manual transmission car, in the snow, in the dead of winter, with a foot of snow on the road. Give me an automatic transmission anytime–it drives just as well and you can always use D1 or D2 if you need to slow down so your tires don’t slide…

  3. zakimar:

    I don’t think my son will be bringing a stick shift (manual transmission) car home. He drove one of his friend’s stick shift car, came home, and said “Never again will I drive a stick shift!”

    Right now, he doesn’t have a car, so he’s been taking the bus to meet with his friends and girlfriends. And most of Them are now leaving their cars at home and taking the bus. It’s a heck of a lot cheaper to go round-trip on a bus, than to spend $10 for a few gallons of gas in the car, and they can enjoy themselves, knowing there will be no need for a designated driver. They don’t get drunk, but they like to go out to dinner and have a few beers or mixed drinks, so I’m glad that no one is behind the wheel of a car, endangering others.

    PS. My son is 28 years old, still lives at home and helps pay the bills. Funny thing was when I was 18 years old, back in 1978, everyone I knew, including me, was moving out on our own. But now, almost all of my son’s friends are his age and they too, still live with their parents. It’s much cheaper, they can take off whenever they want, and they don’t have to worry about room mates not cleaning up or sharing the expenses. It costs too much to live by yourself these days–you either have to have a room mate or stay with the folks, so I’m happy that I know where my son is (most of the time) and that he can take off for a few days without having to worry about his things being stolen, or a room mate taking off and leaving him with all the bills…

  4. Percy/peercy,
    The sad thing is you actually think you’re witty with the sludge remark. If you knew anything about history you would know that Muslims were practicing sanitation, while Europeans were throwing excrement in the street. If you knew a little more history than that you’d know that in the Indian City of Mohenjo Daro circa 1,500 BCE, they had toilets, indoor plumbing and sewer systems that far surpassed anything in Europe or the US, until the 19th Century.

    There is much Zak and I disagree on, but I dislike ignorant racism and jingoism directed at any culture. I take pride in being an American because of our constitution and aspects of our history. Because I am a good American though, I try to also understand the culture and history of other peoples, without wrapping myself in jingoistic nonsense that only exposes the ignorance of the people spouting it.

  5. I’m the same way except for the cars. Since I bought my first German car, I can never go back to the North American stuff. I know it’s a “guy thing”, but with Audi, BMW, Mercedes, Porsche and VW to choose from, I’m pretty sure your son will be coming home with one, preferably a stick (manual transmission).

  6. zakimar:

    Yes, I know when my husband and I are married 30 years, the traditional gift is Pearls; the modern gift is Diamonds.

    But guess what? I don’t need or want any of those gems or pearls. I only wear my wedding ring and some plain hoop earrings. That’s all I need. I don’t even know where my diamond engagement ring is anymore. I just don’t go for fancy jewelry, fancy cars or fancy clothes. I’ve always been like that. Just give me clean, comfortable clothes and a nice pair of shoes, and I’m happy. I HATE going to the malls to window shop. I only go to department stores when I have to buy something and I already know what it is. Why should I waste my time looking at stuff in malls that I know I’m not going to buy, nor can I afford to buy?

    My son says I’m like a ‘dinosaur’ in that I don’t have to be wined and dined or have to have lots of clothes, shoes or jewelry to be happy, like his girlfriends all want. I’m a ‘homebody’ and only go out a few times per year to celebrate special occasions–birthdays and wedding anniversary. Since I rarely go out to dine, when I do, the event is especially happy, my son brings his digital camera to take photos and we all have a great time and the memories are always there to share.

    One can only go out so many times for dinner and dancing, see movies, concerts or live stage. After that, you’re bound to get bored and tired of it; even if you have all the money in the world, it can’t buy you True Happiness.

    I am a very different person than my family. I often wonder if I was dropped off at my parents’ doorstep when I was a baby. LOL 🙂

  7. zakimar: how deep is the sewage sludge in the street in your country? someday some american has to come over there and teach you about sewers and all that modern stuff.

  8. zakimar: how deep is the sewage sludge in the street in your country? someday some american has to come over there and teach you about sewers and all that modern stuff.

  9. Congratulations Mary; Hopefully your husband knows that next year is your PEARL anniversary.

  10. But I say to you, do not resist the evildoer. But whoever strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other to him as well. (Matthew 5:39)

    …We sent after them Jesus the son of Mary, and bestowed on him the Gospel: and We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him Compassion and Mercy. (Koran 57:27)

    As Jesus inspired both Muslims and Christians, I continue to follow his guidance. I have as many cheeks as you do hands, so go in Peace my brother.

  11. percy:

    I am a Happily married woman and I don’t think I’ll ever love another man beside my husband. I’ve been married to him since I was 18 years old; I’m now 47 years old and am still in Love with him, maybe even more since the day we were married, because we’ve had to face many difficult situations caused by mean and evil people, and we’ve come through it all by sticking together. 🙂

    If toby is faking being zakimar, that will be his burden to bear. But you sure do get emotional and all hyper about him posting. Are you sure YOU aren’t zakimar or toby? Not that it matters to me either.

    I enjoy coming here to have serious debate, give an occasional yank on ‘the chain’ and to read other’s views. I don’t need to know who you all are or what your real names are.

    I’m just glad that Mr. Turley allows us to have open discussions on his website.

  12. Percy, russ, toby and martha:

    So do you all follow Rush Limbaugh on the radio?

    He said something so vile today that I hope you will call him on it, because it doesn’t belong with either Republic or Democratic ideas.

    I won’t repeat it word for word, but basically Limbaugh said that John Edwards had an affair because his wife Elizabeth mainly could only nag with her mouth and do nothing else with it.

    Very insulting to hear on the news that this Adulterer, Rush Limbaugh, would have the nerve to say something like this about Elizabeth Edwards, who has Incurable Cancer.

    I would complain if someone said this about Hillary Clinton, Cindy McCain or Michelle Obama. It was very, very ugly and Rush should absolutely Apologize to Elizabeth Edwards, either in person, or in a hand-written letter with a sincere apology and a nice bouquet of flowers.

    This kind of crude talk has NO Business in politics or being on public radio!

  13. TOBY (AKA zakimar) cut the crap. You got everybody really BELIEVING you are an islamic nutball! You really GOT to cut the play acting out or Mary Leon will be looking to date you!

  14. Jesus advised that I turn my cheek, so that is what I’m doing. Once again, go in Peace my Brother.

  15. I know that I shouldn’t take pleasure from it, but I’m glad that God willing, I’ll outlive both Bushes, both Clintons, McCain and Murdoch. I want to see how many people will have the courage to say how they really feel about those warmonger death merchants. A world free of all of them will make Satan almost as happy as most people on this planet.

  16. zakimar, quit throwing out your false maliciously intended “go in peace my brother, you have no enemy here” BS.

    Cut the crap. You know it, we know it, everybody knows it. YOU are a religious indoctrinated NUTBALL.

  17. zakimar:

    You are correct. Unfortunately, there isn’t any president in recent history who in some indirect or direct way hasn’t killed people.

    The difference with Barack Obama and John McCain is that John McCain WANTS to keep the ‘war business’ going as long as possible.
    Barack Obama knows he can’t shut off the ‘war business’ overnight, but he will not be basing his whole candidacy on ‘war’ like McCain.

    I don’t understand why McCain is so gung-ho about seeing our young men and women killed, when he was a POW himself during Vietnam.

    One reason McCain wants the ‘war business’ to keep on going is that he is somehow getting payback for being abandoned in Vietnam, and now HE will be the one to abandon US troops in Iraq, Iran, and who knows where. Another warped reason could be that McCain will be making a TON of money on the rebuilding contracts.

    Either way, he’s so old he won’t be able to spend the money that his wife gets every month in interest; her being a beer distribution heiress, worth over $100 Million, let alone worry about spending kickbacks from Halliburton, KBR and Blackwater.

  18. Has any US President in recent history made it through two terms without killing people? I hope Obama is different, but eight years with the Military Industrial Complex breathing down your neck is a long time.

    I notice ever since Fox and CNN began to monopolize the news, I haven’t heard from Noam Chomsky, perhaps Dr. Turley can put in a good word next time he’s on MSNBC.

Comments are closed.