Bio

JONATHAN TURLEY
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

unnamed-1Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, University of Chicago, and other schools.

After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history. In addition to his extensive publications, Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers, military personnel, judges, members of Congress, and a wide range of other clients. He is also one of the few attorneys to successfully challenge both a federal and a state law — leading to courts striking down the federal Elizabeth Morgan law as well as the state criminalization of cohabitation.

In 2010, Professor Turley represented Judge G. Thomas Porteous in his impeachment trial. After a trial before the Senate, Professor Turley (on December 7, 2010) argued both the motions and gave the final argument to all 100 U.S. Senators from the well of the Senate floor — only the 14th time in history of the country that such a trial of a judge has reached the Senate floor. Judge Porteous was convicted of four articles of impeachments, including the acceptance of $2000 from an attorney and using a false name on a bankruptcy filing.

In 2011, Professor Turley filed a challenge to the Libyan War on behalf of ten members of Congress, including Representatives Roscoe Bartlett (R., Md); Dan Burton (R., Ind.); Mike Capuano (D., Mass.); Howard Coble (R., N.C.); John Conyers (D., Mich.); John J. Duncan (R., Tenn.); Tim Johnson (R., Ill.); Walter Jones (R., N.C.); Dennis Kucinich (D., Ohio); and Ron Paul (R., Tx). The lawsuit was before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Turley-600x287In November 2014, Turley agreed to serve as lead counsel to the United States House of Representatives in its constitutional challenge to changes ordered by President Obama to the Affordable Care Act. The litigation was approved by the House of Representatives to seek judicial review of the claims under the separation of powers. On May 12, 2016, the federal court handed down a historic victory for the House and ruled that the Obama Administration violated the separation of powers in ordering billions to be paid to insurance companies without an appropriation of Congress.

Other cases include his representation of the Area 51 workers at a secret air base in Nevada; the nuclear couriers at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; the Rocky Flats grand jury in Colorado; Dr. Eric Foretich, the husband in the famous Elizabeth Morgan custody controversy; and four former United States Attorneys General during the Clinton impeachment litigation. In the Foretich case, Turley succeeded recently in reversing a trial court and striking down a federal statute through a rare “bill of attainder” challenge. Professor Turley has also served as counsel in a variety of national security cases, including espionage cases like that of Jim Nicholson, the highest ranking CIA officer ever accused of espionage. Turley also served as lead defense counsel in the successful defense of Petty Officer Daniel King, who faced the death penalty for alleged spying for Russia. Turley also served as defense counsel in the case of Dr. Tom Butler, who is faced criminal charges dealing with the importation and handling of thirty vials of plague in Texas. He also served as counsel to Larry Hanauer, the House Intelligence Committee staffer accused of leaking a classified Presidential National Intelligence Estimate to the New York Times. (Hanauer was cleared of all allegations).

05282015_6695Among his current cases, Professor Turley represents Dr. Ali Al-Timimi, who was convicted in Virginia in 2005 of violent speech against the United States. In 2020, the federal court found that there merit in the challenges raised by Professor Turley and his co-counsel Tom Huff. Accordingly, the judge ordered his release to protect him from Covit-19 while the Court prepared a decision on the challenges. Pursuant to a court order, Dr. Al-Timimi was released from the Supermax in Colorado and the two drove across the country so that he could be placed into home confinement.  He also represented Dr. Sami Al-Arian, who was accused of being the American leader of a terrorist organization while he was a university professor in Florida. Turley represented Dr. Al-Arian for eight years, much of which was in a determined defense against an indictment for criminal contempt. The case centered on the alleged violation of a plea bargain by the Justice Department after Dr. Al-Arian was largely exonerated of terrorism charges in Tampa, Florida. On June 27, 2014, all charges were dropped against Dr. Al-Arian. He also represented pilots approaching or over the age of 60 in their challenge to the mandatory retirement age of the FAA. He also represented David Murphee Faulk, the whistleblower who disclosed abuses in the surveillance operations at NSA’s Fort Gordon facility in Georgia.

Professor Turley also agreed to serve as lead counsel representing the Brown family from the TLC “Sister Wives, a reality show on plural marriage or polygamy. On December 13, 2013, the federal court in Utah struck down the criminalization of polygamy — the first such decision in history — on free exercise and due process grounds. On September 26, 2014, the court also ruled in favor of the Browns under Section 1983 — giving them a clean sweep on all of the statutory and constitutional claims.  In April 2015, a panel reversed the decision on standing grounds and that decision is now on appeal.

Professor Turley was also lead counsel in the World Bank protest case stemming from the mass arrest of people in 2002 by the federal and district governments during demonstrations of the IMF and World Bank.  Turley and his co-lead counsel Dan Schwartz (and the law firm of Bryan Cave) were the first to file and represented student journalists arrested without probable cause.  In April 2015, after 13 years of intense litigation, the case was settled for $2.8 million, including $115,000 for each arrestee — a record damage award in a case of this kind and over twice the amount of prior damages for individual protesters.  The case also exposed government destruction and withholding of evidence as well as the admitted mass arrest of hundreds of people without probable cause.

Professor Turley also served as the legal expert in the review of polygamy laws in the British of Columbia (Canada) Supreme Court. In the latter case, he argued for the decriminalization of plural union and conjugal unions. In 2012, Turley also represented the makers of “Five Wives Vodka” (Ogden’s Own Distillery) in challenging an effective ban on the product in Idaho after officials declared the product to be offensive to Mormons. After opposing to the ban on free speech and other grounds, the state of Idaho issued a letter apologizing for public statements made by officials and lifting the ban on sale for “Five Wives Vodka.”

Turley has served as a consultant on homeland security and constitutional issues, including the Florida House of Representatives. He also served as the consultant to the Puerto Rico House of Representatives on the impeachment of Gov. Aníbal Acevedo Vilá.

05282015_6655Professor Turley is a frequent witness before the House and Senate on constitutional and statutory issues as well as tort reform legislation. That testimony includes the confirmation hearings of Attorney General nominees Loretta Lynch and William Barr as well as Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.  Professor Turley is also a nationally recognized legal commentator. Professor Turley was ranked as 38th in the top 100 most cited “public intellectuals” in the recent study by Judge Richard Posner. Turley was also found to be the second most cited law professor in the country. He has been repeatedly ranked in the nation’s top 500 lawyers in annual surveys (including in the latest rankings by LawDragon) – one of only a handful of academics. In prior years, he was ranked as one of the nation’s top ten lawyers in military law cases as well as one of the top 40 lawyers under 40. He was also selected in the last five years as one of the 100 top Irish lawyers in the world.  In 2016, he was ranked as one of the 100 most famous (past and present) law professors.

694940094001_6113691487001_6113685625001-vsProfessor Turley is one of only two academics to testify at both the Clinton and Trump impeachment hearings. In December 2019, Professor Turley was called as the one Republican witness in the House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearings.  He appeared with three Democratic witnesses.  Professor Turley disagreed with this fellow witnesses in opposing the proposed articles of impeachments on bribery, extortion, campaign finance violations or obstruction of justice. He argued that these alleged impeachable acts were at odds with controlling definitions of those crimes and that Congress has historically looked to the criminal code and cases for guidance on such allegations.  The committee ultimately rejected those articles and adopted the only two articles that Professor Turley said could be legitimately advanced: abuse of power, obstruction of Congress. Chairman Jerrold Nadler even ended the hearing by quoting his position on abuse of power. However, Turley  opposed impeachment on this record as incomplete and insufficient for submission to the Senate. He argued for the House to wait and complete the record by seeking to compel key witnesses like former National Security Adviser John Bolton.  His testimony was later relied upon in the impeachment floor debate by various House members and he was cited by both the White House and House managers in their arguments before the United States Senate in the Trump impeachment trial, including videotaped remarks played at the trial.

download-2Professor Turley’s articles on legal and policy issues appear regularly in national publications with hundreds of articles in such newspapers as the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal. He is a columnist for USA Today and writes regularly for the Washington Post. In 2005, Turley was given the Columnist of the Year award for Single-Issue Advocacy for his columns on civil liberties by the Aspen Institute and the Week Magazine. Professor Turley also appears regularly as a legal expert on all of the major television networks. Since the 1990s, he has worked under contract as the on-air Legal Analyst for NBC News, CBS News, BBC and Fox News.  Professor Turley has been a repeated guest on Sunday talk shows with over two-dozen appearances on Meet the Press, ABC This Week, Face the Nation, and Fox Sunday. Professor Turley has taught courses on constitutional law, constitutional criminal law, environmental law, litigation, and torts. He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Older Prisoners (POPS). His work with older prisoners has been honored in various states, including his selection as the 2011 recipient of the Dr. Mary Ann Quaranta Elder Justice Award at Fordham University.

His award-winning blog is routinely ranked as one of the most popular legal blogs by AVVO. His blog was selected as the top News/Analysis site in 2013, the top Legal Opinion Blog in 2011 as well as prior selections as the top Law Professor Blog and Legal Theory Blog. It was also ranked in the top 20 constitutional law blog in 2018.  It has been regularly ranked by the ABA Journal in the top 100 blogs in the world. In 2012, Turley has selected as one of the top 20 legal experts on Twitter by Business Insider. In 2013, the ABA Journal inducted the Turley Blog into its Hall of Fame.

Professor Turley received his B.A. at the University of Chicago and his J.D. at Northwestern. In 2008, he was given an honorary Doctorate of Law from John Marshall Law School for his contributions to civil liberties and the public interest.

For further information: Mr. Seth Tate – 202-994-0537

Icon made by DinosoftLabs from Flaticon

1,553 thoughts on “Bio”

  1. russ, percy and others,

    Why are you bothering to come here and insult us serious people who want to talk about Mr. Turley and his work?

    Why don’t you just go to a right-wing website or Fox News site?

    Thanks,

    Mary Leon

  2. Shock: Obama disagrees with Court’s decision in child rape caseposted at 6:35 pm on June 25, 2008

    Actually, not so shocking.

    Had the decision come four months ago in the heat of the primary and he responded this way, that would have been shocking.

    As it is, consider this the legal equivalent of his many full-throated statements of support for Israel. Maybe he means it, maybe he doesn’t, but he can’t afford to be on the wrong side of it politically so his disciples will just have to console themselves with the possibility that it’s yet another lie concocted in the interests of getting elected.

    The DUers & other left wing lunatics sound bummed. They’ll get over it. He is their only choice and even as he runs to the right of where Hillary was and governs even further to the right of that when elected; they will cheer him on anyway since he is THEIR GUY.

  3. mary leon, the only thing at this web site are a handful of left wing lunatics that don’t have a clue…….like you.

  4. One more thing, russ:

    You might be interested in “Project for the New American Century” (PNAC) agenda. It is a delusional Neo-Con dream of world dominance, starting in the Middle East. I’m sure you will find it a fascinating work of fiction. Some of the original signers of the agenda: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and Jeb Bush. Very interesting that these men are or were so involved with this White House administration…

    You’ll have to find it in Wikipedia, though (look under the PNAC archives). The main website is Closed, with a message to contact the accounts office. You would think that William Kristol–the main author of the PNAC agenda–would have more than enough money to keep the website going.

    Anyway, enjoy the agenda. I do hope you’ll come back here soon and let us know how you are doing your best to dream this impossible dream of a One World Order led by the Neo-Cons.

    Adios, russ,

    Mary Leon

  5. russ:

    I was leaving a message for Mr. Turley, not you.

    You’ve added your opinion, so thanks, but I can decide for myself who I like to watch on TV and I enjoy watching Keith Olbermann.

    I would think that you would be too busy to post here, what with all the scandals and lies coming from your president Bush and his White House gang.

    Every day I look forward to the newest exposed lies and corruption. And, yes, even though it may take time, your president Bush will be exposed for what he has done to destroy our country and our US Constitution and Especially the loss of our US troops and Innocent Iraqis; either in this world or the next.

    I’m also looking forward to Election Day this November so I can cast my vote for Sen. Barack Obama.

    Adios, russ,

    Mary Leon

  6. Mary Leon:

    I can guarantee you Mr. turley is not qualified for a SC nomination. He is like Obama, all talk and no facts.

    Shame you are so enamoured with a low life narcistic person like Mr. Olbermann. Most people have seen right through him which is why even Oreilly’s re-run ratings from two hours later beat Olbermann’s prime time show.

  7. Mr. Turley,

    I always look forward to your appearances on “Countdown With Keith Olbermann”. I wish you could have been my government teacher, way back in the 1970s when I was in high school. I may have chosen a different path in life.

    I have sent a suggestion to Barack Obama’s website that he consider you for a seat on the Supreme Court, after he becomes President. I know you would use the Constitution as your basis for decisions, and not let any politicians influence you.

    Thank you for your logical, factual and excellent discussions with Keith; and I do hope you will consider becoming a Supreme Court Judge, if the situation arises.

    Sincerely,
    Mary Leon

  8. Mornegleide & you liberals here, all three of you:

    Yes, the US Constitution is idiot proof from our liberals. They can’t touch it. Liberals in America are the most intolerent group of people you will ever find when it comes to politics. They will shout you down, ruin speeches by screaming epithets, march in the streets intimidating those they disagree with by getting in their face, mock as neanderthals those they differ with.

    But we are safe in our US Constitution. It calls for free speech and the liberals are not able to take that away no matter how much they scream, rant, swear at others, or push them around.

    I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT LIBERALS ALWAYS FEEL THEY MUST GET THE LAST WORD IN……….

  9. russ:

    Personally, I think no liberal would ever shout you down or mock you. Why should they, by comparison they all sound like Winston Churchill or Cicero. Carry on brave defender of the faith.

  10. Mornegleide & you liberals here, all three of you:

    Yes, the US Constitution is idiot proof from our liberals. They can’t touch it. Liberals in America are the most intolerent group of people you will ever find when it comes to politics. They will shout you down, ruin speeches by screaming epithets, march in the streets intimidating those they disagree with by getting in their face, mock as neanderthals those they differ with.

    But we are safe in our US Constitution. It calls for free speech and the liberals are not able to take that away no matter how much they scream, rant, swear at others, or push them around.

  11. JT:

    I thought about Mason too, but Jefferson could discuss a broader range of topics from horticulture to natural law to politics to inventions. If I could pick anyone from the period, I would take Meriwether Lewis. Assuming we could get him to talk (he was hopelessly shy) that would be a conversation for the ages including the mysterious circumstances of his death at Grinder’s Stand. Jefferson was a tad cantankerous and a bit haughty, but I personally would love to hear about that election in 1800. BTW your tie was quite the hit apparently.

  12. Alan Liechty:

    I will assume that weird in “Legal News of the Weird” is not meant to be a reference back to the legal news rather than the blogger. Thanks for your kind note, much appreciated.

  13. Mespo:

    I am frankly uncertain about the dinner invite for T. Jefferson if only a third chair is available. I would probably first ask George Mason and, if I am allowed to go foreign, Edmund Burke. It is not that I am in total agreement, but I would expect that to be a very interesting evening out. TJ would certainly be in the top five from that period, however.

  14. I agree with Alan, above, on both counts… 😉

    That tie really is “Off the Hook” – a Happy Father’s Day present?
    You looked ‘mahvelous’ on KO 6/19.

    Yours has to be the whitest shirt I have every seen – against that dark blue jacket! Nice combination for you. Surely, even Leslie approved.

    p.s. How are Madison and the other cabinet members?

  15. Bindo and Russ:

    This page is a bio of someone who, when he talks, I listen.

    Your points may be relevant, but please take them elsewhere.

    Professor Turley:

    Yes, when you talk on the tube I make sure I put down what I am doing and listen. Your analysis is clear and to the point and heck, nice tie!

    I read this blog daily, which I consider to be a “Legal News of the Weird”. I wonder how some of these cases turn out.

    Thanks for being a clear voice for the Constitution, a document that seems these days to be used more as an earplug than a legal statement of Ideals.

  16. Hi Mespo! I know you posed the question about including T. Jefferson in the group of three to JT, but may I say that I agree? 🙂

  17. JT:
    Though a life-long admirer (I even went to his University)I think a table for three would have include his neighbor and friend Thos. Jefferson. Wouldn’t you agree?

  18. MornenGleide:

    No contest. James Madison. Though I would have to chide him over the electoral college.

  19. MornenGleide”

    “They will shout you down, ruin speeches by screaming epithets, march in the streets intimidating those they disagree with by getting in their face, mock as neanderthals those they differ with.”
    *********************

    Yeah, yeah what russ said and plus they spy on you, intercept your phone calls, place you in “free speech zones” away from any political speaker, confinscate tape recorders from journalists when their Judges talk, eject people from speeches by public officials (even Presidents) because of the T-shirt you wear, and many other horrible things–oh wait, that was conservatives who did that to liberals. My bad!

  20. “Yes, the US Constitution is idiot proof from our liberals. They can’t touch it.”

    I may not be a liberal, but I do know a duplicitous liar when I see one.

    It’s amazing how you can feign loyalty to the constitution out of one side of your mouth, while cheering on an administration as it uses the constitution as a urinal puck, out of the other side of your mouth.

Comments are closed.