Liquid Assets: City Claims Public Urination Revenue

thumb_bag_of_moneyThe City of Plattsburgh, New York has an increasing problem with public urination. However, the biggest problem is that the city kept only five percent of the money streaming out of these arrests to the state. It may be a sign of the economic times that cities and states are fighting over urination fines as a new stream of revenue.

Plattsburgh has declared a public urination “epidemic.” Plattsburgh police Lt. Scott Beebie said the most common urination sites are located around downtown business.

The City Council decided this week to make disorderly conduct a local law. City Council member Chris Jackson explained:”What it does is instead of sending 95 percent of the fine to the state … we now keep 95 percent of the fine and send 5 percent to the state. Nothing’s changed. The actual wording of the law is no different than it was yesterday, so it’s just a matter of keeping money here in the city.”

It is unclear how much the city will become dependent on this new revenue stream or whether it will create a perverse incentive to add drinking fountains and pictures of ocean scenes to increase the rate of violators.

There are also the problems of interstate commerce. If a defendant urinates across a state line, where is he prosecuted and which state gets the fine?

For the full story, click here.

3 Responses to “Liquid Assets: City Claims Public Urination Revenue”


  1. 1 rafflaw 1, November 15, 2008 at 11:39 am

    This is amazing that one city collects enough money from fines related to public urination that the state and city would be able to fight about their split of the overflow of funds. If New York city is not getting enough of a share, they could always stop enforcing it and then noone benefits from this natural process.

  2. 2 Cereal 1, November 16, 2008 at 5:11 pm

    This is ridiculous. There’s obviously a dearth of public restrooms in Plattsburgh. Instead of trying to fix the problem, the city tries to make money off of its mismanagement. Here’s a solution: If they can’t afford to build new restrooms, pay off hostile private establishments to accept walk-ins. I think its perfectly reasonable for the public to expect public lavatories.

  3. 3 Brendan Fevola 1, May 21, 2009 at 11:22 pm

    You know urine trouble when they are making money from public urination!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 781 other followers