Rule Against PETAtuities: Ingrid Newkirk Bequeths Body Parts For Macabre Testamentary Gifts

200px-ingrid_newkirk_by_david_shankboneOk, there is the rule against perpetuities, but I cannot find a rule against petatuities. PETA President Ingrid Newkirk has released her will that includes giving her body to PETA for the suggested purpose of people eating her flesh and making leather goods from her skin.

My favorite gesture is “That one of my thumbs be removed, mounted upwards on a plaque, and sent to the person or institution that, in the year of my death or thereabouts, PETA decides has done the most to promote alternatives to the use and abuse of animals in any area of their exploitation.” Now, that is something to work for — Ingrid Newkirk’s thumb mounted on your desk. It will go so nicely with the Ingrid Newkirk leather pumps and flank steaks. What ever happened to a nice PETA mug or tee-shirt?

Of course, being on Ingrid’s good side is not much different from being on her bad side. Here is the terms covering her pointing finger: “That my pointing finger be delivered to Kenneth Feld, owner of Ringling Bros. and Barnum&Bailey Circus, or to a circus museum to stand as the “Greatest Accusation on Earth” on behalf of the countless elephants, lions, tigers, bears, and other animals who have been kidnapped from their families and removed from their homelands in India, Thailand, Africa, and South America and deprived of all that is natural and pleasant to them, abused, and forced into involuntary servitude for the sake of cheap entertainment.” In the tradition of P.T. Barnum, Feld should accept the finger and put it on display as the “Haunted Finger of a PETA Demoness.”

Newkirk has led PETA’s push to the fringes of society where it primarily serves to shock the public and confirm the worst stereotypes of animal activists and environmentalists. PETA’s loony commercials and displays could not please animal-use industries more. It has made people who care about animals appear completely insane. While one may believe “crazy as a fox” is a worthy model from our forest friends, it is not quite as useful when people drop the fox reference.

As someone who has dedicated a part of my life to the alleviation of animal suffering in various parts of the world, it is my wish that upon my death, my body be used to further that same goal. It is with this purpose in mind that I make the following directions and designations relating to the disposition of my final remains. I make these directions and designations after thorough consideration and pursuant to my firm belief in the purposes for which they are made.

1. Upon my death, it is my wish that my body be used in a manner that draws attention to needless animal suffering and exploitation. To accomplish this, I direct that my body be donated to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), 501 Front Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, to be used in whatever manner it chooses in order to accomplish the specified purpose, with the hope that most of my body will be put to use in the United States, with parts also dispatched to awaken the public consciousness of governments and citizens in the United Kingdom, where I was born, in India, my beloved childhood home, and in Canada, Germany, and France.

2. While the final decision as to the use of my body remains with PETA, I make the following suggested directions:

a. That the “meat” of my body, or a portion thereof, be used for a human barbecue, to remind the world that the meat of a corpse is all flesh, regardless of whether it comes from a human being or another animal, and that flesh foods are not needed;

b. That my skin, or a portion thereof, be removed and made into leather products, such as purses, to remind the world that human skin and the skin of other animals is the same and that neither is “fabric” nor needed, and that some skin be tacked up outside the Indian Leather Fair each year to serve as a reminder of the government’s need to abate the suffering of Indian bullocks who, after a life of extreme and involuntary servitude, as I have seen firsthand, are exported all over the world in this form;

c. That in remembrance of the elephant-foot umbrella stands and tiger rugs I saw, as a child, offered for sale by merchants at Connaught Place in Delhi, my feet be removed and umbrella stands or other ornamentation be made from them, as a reminder of the depravity of killing innocent animals, such as elephants, in order that we might use their body parts for household items and decorations;

d. That one of my eyes be removed, mounted, and delivered to the administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a reminder that PETA will continue to be watching the agency until it stops poisoning and torturing animals in useless and cruel experiments; that the other is to be used as PETA sees fit;

e. That my pointing finger be delivered to Kenneth Feld, owner of Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, or to a circus museum to stand as the “Greatest Accusation on Earth” on behalf of the countless elephants, lions, tigers, bears, and other animals who have been kidnapped from their families and removed from their homelands in India, Thailand, Africa, and South America and deprived of all that is natural and pleasant to them, abused, and forced into involuntary servitude for the sake of cheap entertainment;

f. That my liver be vacuum-packed and shipped, in whole or in part, to France, to there be used in a public appeal to persuade shoppers not to support the vile practice of force-feeding geese and ducks for foie gras;

g. That one of my ears be removed, mounted, and sent to the Canadian Parliament to assist them in hearing, for the first time perhaps, the screams of the seals, bears, raccoons, foxes, and minks bludgeoned, trapped, and sometimes skinned alive for their pelts; that the other ear be removed, preserved, and displayed outside the Deonar abattoir in Mumbai to remind all who do business there that the screams of the cattle who are slaughtered within its walls are heard around the world;

h. That one of my thumbs be removed, mounted upwards on a plaque, and sent to the person or institution that, in the year of my death or thereabouts, PETA decides has done the most to promote alternatives to the use and abuse of animals in any area of their exploitation;

i. That one of my thumbs be mounted in a downward position and sent to the person or institution that, in the year of my death or thereabouts, has gone against the changing tide of societal opinion and frightened and hurt animals in some egregious manner;

j. That a little part of my heart be buried near the racetrack at Hockenheim, preferably near the Ferrari pits, where Michael Shumacher raced in and won the German Grand Prix;

k. That anything else be done with my body that PETA believes will serve to draw attention to and so abate the plight of exploited animals.

3. As a resident of Virginia, and pursuant to Virginia law, including
§ 54.1-2825 of the Virginia Code, I designate PETA as the “person” who shall make arrangements for carrying out the directions contained in this document for the disposition of my remains upon my death. If, at any time, PETA is unable or unwilling to carry out these directions, I designate, in the alternative, Daniel Mathews as the individual who shall make arrangements for carrying out the directions contained in this document for the disposition of my remains upon my death. If Daniel Mathews is unable or unwilling to carry out these directions as required, I authorize either of the two listed “persons” in this paragraph to designate a third party to make arrangements for carrying out the directions contained in this document for the disposition of my remains upon my death.

4. While I prefer that my directions be first executed in the United States, I also direct that parts of my body be transported to the United Kingdom, of which I also am a citizen, and to India, my beloved spiritual home, to be executed there. If my directions cannot be executed in any of these countries, I authorize the transport of my remains to any location where my disposition directions, in whole or in part, may be lawfully executed.

5. I authorize the person carrying out these directions to deviate from them in any manner he or she deems appropriate to further the purpose expressed herein. If any provision or provisions of this document shall be held to be invalid, illegal, unenforceable, or in conflict with the law of any jurisdiction, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

______________________ _______________
INGRID NEWKIRK DATE

NOTARY PUBLIC:

SIGN: ________________________ (SEAL)

WITNESSES

The foregoing document was published, declared, and signed by Ingrid Newkirk, in our presence, and we subscribe it in her presence, and in the presence of each other.

______________________ _______________
WITNESS (SIGN) DATE

______________________
WITNESS (PRINT)

______________________ _______________
WITNESS (SIGN) DATE

______________________
WITNESS (PRINT)

ACCEPTANCE BY DESIGNATED PERSONS

PETA

I have read and fully understand the contents of this document. I accept the designation as the person to carry out the directions set forth herein and will comply with those directions to the best of my ability.

For People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals:

_________________________ ____________________
MARY BETH SWEETLAND DATE
Senior Vice President
PETA

NOTARY PUBLIC:

SIGN: ________________________ (SEAL)

DANIEL MATHEWS

I have read and fully understand the contents of this document. Should the conditions precedent be met, I accept the designation as the person to carry out the directions set forth herein and will comply with those directions to the best of my ability.

______________________ ____________________
DANIEL MATHEWS DATE
NOTARY PUBLIC:

SIGN: ________________________ (SEAL)

This makes the will of Jeremy (“Greatest Good for the Greatest Number”) Bentham look perfectly normal Bentham who stipulated that his body be preserved and stored in a wooden cabinet called his “Auto-icon” by his disciple Dr. Southwood Smith:

it was acquired by University College London in 1850. The Auto-icon is kept on public display at the end of the South Cloisters in the main building of the College. For the 100th and 150th anniversaries of the college, the Auto-icon was brought to the meeting of the College Council, where he was listed as “present but not voting”. Tradition holds that if the council’s vote on any motion is tied, the auto-icon always breaks the tie by voting in favour of the motion.

The Auto-icon has always had a wax head, as Bentham’s head was badly damaged in the preservation process. The real head was displayed in the same case for many years, but became the target of repeated student pranks including being stolen on more than one occasion. It is now locked away securely.

230px-jeremy_bentham_auto-icon

Of course, Newkirk’s will happens to dictate unlawful terms (though it is expressed as mere suggestions). In most states, it would be illegal to give someone your corpse unless it is a research facility or funeral home. Society is a bit sensitive about corporeal gifts. Perish the thought that this is just another PETA ploy for controversy.

It appears, however, that one group that is unlikely to receive a Newkirk thumbs up is the good people at “No Kill” who have accused Newkirk of being a mass murderer of animals. This break away PETA group accuses Newkirk of being responsible for the murder of thousands of pets in a pound in the 1970s by dispatching them early in the mornings — the virtual Mengele of the Mutt World.

For the will, click here.

11 thoughts on “Rule Against PETAtuities: Ingrid Newkirk Bequeths Body Parts For Macabre Testamentary Gifts”

  1. Gyges,
    While I hate to use the word because of Bush, terrorists does come to mind when I think of PETA.

  2. Mike,

    Not just absurd, but dangerous. I can remember several instances where they physically attacked people who worked in places that perform research on lab animals.

  3. “weirdness is an effective tool for getting people to see slaughterhouse videos (for example).”

    Toby,
    If you think weirdness will affect PETA’s standing in a positive way, you are deluding yourself. I’m sympathetic to the cause and I find PETA people to be absurd.

  4. Toby:

    what is wrong with a burger or some BBQ? Are you opposed to any kind of meat or just from big farms? I buy some meat locally that has been treated humanely. I have even helped my uncle slaughter sheep, he uses a knife and cuts the trachea and juglar and carotid, he says that death is about as “instantaneous” as you can get and the animals dont feel much pain. By their reaction I would say he is right.

    Although the blood comes shooting out of the neck like a fire house for about 20 seconds after you make the cut. Man sheep have a lot of blood. He told me this is how the Rabbi’s do it for Kosher (Mike S. is that right?)

    I also saw a cow slaughtered in college for an ag course, they knock the cow out and cut its throat again it did not seem that traumatic. Granted I would not want that sort of treatment but I dont taste very good.

  5. Turley is weak, “they’re SO wacky… SO many norms broken before my very eyes… SO shocking… I don’t want to think about thumbs removed from bodies… ewwww they’re weird”. PETA shocks to get attention because coffee mugs get no attention; we want to convert people to start caring about other animals, and sadly, weirdness is an effective tool for getting people to see slaughterhouse videos (for example).

  6. Alex,
    I agree with you completely. I mentioned my daughter to differentiate, exactly what you just differentiated and in the process didn’t make the point as clearly as you did.

  7. Mike: Just because a person is vegan doesn’t mean that they are automatically a PETA supporter. In fact, there are loads of vegetarians and vegans who find the organization as bizarre and objectionable as the most rabid meat eater.

    I’m vegetarian, almost vegan, and I have been for over 20 years, basically becoming a vegetarian as soon as I was capable of buying my own food, and I find virtually nothing on PETA’s agenda or actions that I’d agree with.

    For example, I see no difference between fur and leather, and I choose not to wear either. Yet this is my personal choice, and I wouldn’t force my choice onto you. PETA has a huge campaign against fur, but nothing against leather.

    Another way that I disagree with PETA is that they exploit the holocaust, which I find both offensive and counterproductive.

    But the biggest objection I have is that I will not support an organization that supports terrorists (the ALF), or targets individuals for their viewpoints. PETA has named people who work in the fashion industry as supporters of fur. We all know that in any large group there will be disturbed people who are potentially violent, and naming individuals this is to my mind like aiming these crazies as weapons.

  8. Doesn’t PETA consider keeping dogs as pets or seeing eye dogs to be “morally” wrong?

    BTW, I find Bill Maher’s friendship with Ingrid Newkirk to be indicative of his proclivity for hypocrisy.

  9. My oldest daughter is a long time vegan and I respect her viewpoint and considered it for myself. I do think that humans have separated themselves from other creatures intellectually and in that process have failed to respect the intelligence and emotions of other creatures. Nevertheless, I have also believed that PETA has exhibited the same rigidity of thought and self righteousness as Fundamentalists. This in itself is interesting because Fundamentalists believe that God has given them dominion over all the other creatures and that is anathema to PETA. Crazy is, as crazy does, despite the merits of their particular beliefs.

  10. If this is not a stunt, I would have to wonder if this woman has the capacity to execute a will. While I agree with some of her stances on the issues, the (mis)use of her body parts to make a point is obscene. Can she be of sound mind and memory when she signed this absurdity?

Comments are closed.