Finally, Some Clarity in the War on Terror . . .

I can’t understand why this wasn’t clear before . . .

The article below details the growing opposition to the role of PowerPoint presentations in the military.

For the full story, click here.

20 Responses to “Finally, Some Clarity in the War on Terror . . .”


  1. 1 Zachary 1, April 28, 2010 at 1:17 pm

    Thank God it is color coded. Otherwise, it would have been very confusing.

  2. 2 Buddha Is Laughing 1, April 28, 2010 at 1:19 pm

    Noodle soup. It’s what’s for dinner.

  3. 3 Former Federal LEO 1, April 28, 2010 at 1:54 pm

    The Industrial Military Complex’s ‘Who’s On First?’ clear explanation of Bush’s Glowbill ($$) War on Terrir.

    This is an example of an old, original oxymoron ‘Military Intelligence’—and a real contradiction in terms.

  4. 4 lottakatz 1, April 28, 2010 at 2:02 pm

    From linked article: ‘When we understand that slide, we’ll have won the war,’ General Stanley McChrystal, the US and NATO force commander, remarked wryly when confronted by the sprawling spaghetti diagram in a briefing.

    —-
    The problem is no one had that diagram before we expanded the war to Afghanistan or invaded Iraq.

    When I was doing a lot of around-the-house and garden building projects my method started with an assessment of the plans. When I ran across a plan that made me say to myself ‘If it’s that freaking complicated I don’t have any business messing with it’ I’d just pass up that project. I’m thinking we need to start hiring politicians and commissioning military leaders with at least as much common sense as an enthusiastic DYIer if we want to stay out of trouble in the future.

  5. 5 Woosty's still a Cat 1, April 28, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    Now I am offended….this is a graphic illustration of His Noodliness, FSM, G*d of the Universe…and to be used as some wartime propaganda machine is sacrilige!

    http://www.venganza.org/about/artists/

  6. 6 Elaine M. 1, April 28, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    Now you see why the term “military intelligence” is considered oxymoronic.

  7. 7 Elaine M. 1, April 28, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    FF LEO–

    OOOPPPS! I didn’t read your comment before I posted mine. Shame on me!

  8. 8 Elaine M. 1, April 28, 2010 at 2:52 pm

    Buddha–

    “Noodle soup. It’s what’s for dinner.”

    And who’s in charge? The Commander in Chef???

  9. 9 Buddha Is Laughing 1, April 28, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    Elaine,

    I’m thinking Chef Boyardee by the quality of the cuisine.

  10. 10 Former Federal LEO 1, April 28, 2010 at 3:05 pm

    Ms. EM wrote,

    “OOOPPPS! I didn’t read your comment before I posted mine…”
    _________________________________

    Nothing unusual there, no one else does either.

    However, I am a bit concerned for you given that you and I both posted about ‘Suzy Snowflake’ at virtually the same time last christmas and now you are thinking like me once again…

  11. 11 Elaine M. 1, April 28, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    FF LEO–

    Suzy Snowflake…military intelligence…what next?

  12. 12 East 1, April 28, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    Not far off from the look of my Torts outline, really. Just the perils of trying to fit too much information into one image.

  13. 13 Mike Appleton 1, April 28, 2010 at 5:21 pm

    I’m grateful that someone has come up with a handy poster. I’m tired of trying to explain all that stuff to the unwashed.

  14. 14 Queen of Sheba 1, April 28, 2010 at 10:59 pm

    I liked it better when generals played with little toy soldiers and tanks on a big table.

  15. 15 William Glaser 1, April 29, 2010 at 8:37 pm

    Makes Glenn Beck’s chalk board seem just a little less crazy. Or maybe not.

  16. 16 Winski 1, April 30, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    This clears up the confusion that surfaced a few days ago indicating that some of the top generals in the US Military indicated that they thought “Power Point makes us stupid”…

    Can’t imagine how they would get that impression….

  17. 17 Anonymously Yours 1, May 6, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    Ok, and the Flight Plan is as follows. Please still back and enjoy the trip.

  18. 18 Lionel 1, May 13, 2010 at 1:15 pm

    Where’s the oil Dan, where’s the pipeline?!**lol**

  19. 19 y0uf00bar 1, May 13, 2010 at 7:31 pm

    The diagram is missing the most important bits.
    Missing are the money flows of military corporation hits.

    The US war tax of a billion dollars a day must go somewhere.
    None of it is given to the people of Afghanistan, thats too unfair

    Some of the money flows into highly paid security guys.
    Some of the money flows into corporate pimps that do supplies.

    There are lots of high tech helicopters, bombs, missiles and drones
    Plus the entire US government congress, their best friends and crones.

    Keeping the Home and Puppet governments rolling in cash is not cheap.
    And the entire occupation of Iraq is still in feaces deep.

    The oil deals in Iraq are not going too well,
    Means another few decades the soldiers will have to dwell.

    The wars are measured by the flow of resources.
    Money goes in, blood flows out, oil comes up the spout.

    If the US government is really going for war broke,
    It must be they like seeing their money blown up in people smoke.

    A hungry beast that has the grossest of appetites for oil
    At the very least is a terror, says feed me, or your nation despoil.

    Saturate the soil with radioactive dust, and punish the people forthwith.
    Dismantle their nation, so there is no centre left to make peace with.

  20. 20 athbhreithathbheochan 1, May 22, 2012 at 5:58 pm

    i have followed your legal reasoning for years. i respect and commend you for your honesty and greatly appreciate your attempts to educate an uneducated public.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 781 other followers