In an extraordinary statement, an employee for the government contractor Jeppensen International Trip Planning ( a Boeing subsidiary) referred to flights taking individuals to other countries as part of the Bush Administration’s “extraordinary rendition” program as “torture flights.” The company director, Bob Overby, reportedly told an August 2006 breakfast of new employees, that these were torture flights but that the flights paid well.
The ACLU is pursuing a novel lawsuit against the company and fighting to keep it in court. Overby resigned five days later — apparently the victim of his own frank admission. Various newspapers have quoted Administration officials admitting that they use rendition to torture suspects. However, Overby failed to follow the script that public admissions are not allowed for legal and political reasons. However, this disclosure follows a public admission by a former CIA employee that waterboarding was used against detainees and that he also understood that waterboarding is torture.
In the meantime, leaders in Congress are again resisting acknowledging that the President has ordered torture — a crime. We are seeing the same pattern that we saw with Iraq. Democrats waited until it was safe to oppose the war and then became serial apologists for giving Bush a blank check. Now, they are waiting to see if it is safe to be against waterboarding and torture. Yet, in the ACLU case and public statements, various government contractors and former employees are making it difficult to avoid recognizing a knowing and comprehensive torture program implementing by the United States.
For the full story, click here
One thought on “Witness: Government Contractor Called Rendition Transfers “Torture Flights””
There was an eye-opening article in the Boston Globe in 2004 about
a family law firm, outside the City, that apparently doubled as a front for a ‘client’ who had a plane on lease to the US government for (rendition) flights out of Logan International – the same airport
from which the Twin Towers were struck.
It was often sighted and well-documented overseas, but not a well-known item of interest in this country.
Comments are closed.