The Bush Administration has reversed its decision to deny a visa to Amy Winehouse due to allegations of drug abuse. However, the visa’s issuance will not result in her attending the Grammy Awards. The entire incident demonstrates the disturbing degree of discretion in the visa system, discretion that can lead to the arbitrary and capricious use of the laws governing entry into the United States.
Ironically, I am staying at the Beverly Hills Hilton where much of the Grammy Awards parties are occurring. (I am here to speak to the ABA convention). The decision to deny entry to Winehouse was reportedly based on U.S. While she has not been charged on that matter, she was previously convicted on a drug charge. Despite her popular song, she was in rehab before the trip.It is hardly a great background, but it is also not unique in this industry. She was not convicted of being a dealer and her one charge is minor. Obviously, thousands of entertainers go in and out of the U.S. with reputations of drug abuse. The element that is troubling is that lack of consistently and the fluidity in these decisions. Tens of thousands of people who have prior drug issues are allowed to enter either because they are minor or not the subject of tabloid media. Moreover, where is the risk to the nation in this background. Finally, this country benefits from being a world center of music and the arts. The Winehouse incident has suggested to the world that we may deny artists on an arbitrary basis, causing media frenzies. Whether it was the delay caused by the appeal or her still questionable health status, Winehouse will not be performing live at the show.
The question is who was responsible and how the laws should be clarified to remove this level of discretion. The use of visas to punish unpopular individuals has long been a source of abuse in the United States. Often this is due to political intolerance. For example, Paul Robeson, the American singer, actor, and political activist, was denied a passport and visa to restrict his travels. Winehouse is obviously no Robeson who was targeted for his political views. However, her case shows how the system is still ripe for abuse.
For the latest story, click here
8 thoughts on “Administration Reverses Its Earlier Denial of Amy Winehouse’s Visa”
my girl crazy, man!
Now that is an endorsement! Even better, you can read and then drive with the Turley blog. Of course, there is the Turley Zinfandel, which is both expensive and intoxicating. However, that is the product of Larry and Helen Turley — those lace-curtain Turleys from Napa.
Thanks for the tip. I will have to try and find the Benton-Lane Pinot Noir. I am sure that it, like the Turley blog, is a pleasure that will gain more and more appreciation over time.
Of course you do! As do the rest of us
– perfectly understanable.
We’re here to support you, JT. 🙂
As for the House Wine Selection, might I suggest an Oregon Red wine this evening-the *Benton-Lane Pinot Noir 2005 or 2004 would be a lovely choice or if you prefer the White, perhaps the Benton-Lane Pinot Gris 2004 or 2005, also from MONROE, Oregon.
‘…This year our Benton-Lane 2005 Pinot Gris was selected as one of the Top 100 wines in the world by Wine & Spirits Magazine. At the same time our 2004 Benton-Lane Pinot Noir was selected as the 80th best wine in the world by Wine Spectator. It is indeed very rare to have a wine selected.’
Thanks to both you DukeS and Patty C,
When ever I think of a persona non grata, I just just naturally think of the White House.
LEAVE JONATHAN ALONE!!!
HE’S A HUMAN!
AND ALL YOU PEOPLE WANT IS
MORE! MORE! MORE! MORE! MORE…!
Small correction: The artists name is Amy Winehouse not Whitehouse.
Comments are closed.