Wal-Qaeda v. Wal-Mart: Superstore Loses Trademark Lawsuit Intended to Shutdown Internet Critic

Charles Smith has done something that thousands and mom-and-pop stores have failed to do in decades: he beat Wal-Mart. The computer store owner from Convers, Georgia prevailed after being sued by Wal-Mart in a trademark case seeking to shutdown his internet sites entiteld Wal-Qaeda and Walocaust. The lawsuit by Wal-Mart was always weak and seemed designed to harass a critic and try to force him to abandon his small website under a barrage of lawyers and motions.

U.S. District Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr. in Atlanta issued an 87-page order rejecting Wal-Mart’ claims and held the obvious: Smith’s site qualified as protected noncommercial speech designed to criticize the company and not make a profit for its products. Moreover, Batten noted there was little chance of confusion between the products of Walocaust and Wal-Mart: “The fact that the real Wal-Mart name and marks are strong and recognizable makes it unlikely that a parody — particularly one that calls to mind the genocide of millions of people, another that evokes the name of a notorious terrorist organization … will be confused with Wal-Mart’s real products.” For a copy of the opinion, click here

Among the various items availabe on Smith’s site was a T-shirt bearing the motto, “I (heart) Wal-ocaust.” Such items led to a series of scary letters being sent from Wal-Mart counsel. What is particularly humorous is that Wal-Mart lawyers constituted Smith’s single largest group of customers: of the only 62 T-shirts sold, 15 were sold to Wal-Mart’s lawyers.

The case appears to be a classic case of the use of a lawsuit to try to bully and intimidate critics. Wal-Mart’s lack of legal judgment has been in open display recently with its cruel lawsuit against a brain-damaged former employee, click here.

For the full story, click here

4 thoughts on “Wal-Qaeda v. Wal-Mart: Superstore Loses Trademark Lawsuit Intended to Shutdown Internet Critic”

  1. Also in the elevator hall, they often display floral
    arrangements pllaced on a console table. My office produhcts store was one of those twelve thousand office supply stores.
    Therefore, it is eminent for all online entities
    too develop their website in the most user friendly manner.

  2. SLAPP suit be damned! Good for you Judge Batten. Now who pays the litigation costs of the defendant?

Comments are closed.