Paparazzi Bait: Cops Accused of Forcing Woman to Be Decoy for Jamie Lynn Spear

180px-lynnspears_croppedThe Los Angeles police are once again the subject of a lawsuit, but this truly a uniquely California form of abuse. The LAPD is accused to forcing a young woman, Adessa Eskridge, 27, to impersonate Jamie Lynn Spears as a decoy to trick the paparazzi. Eskridge is now alleging public humiliation and demanding damages.


According to Eskridge, she was on Jamie Lynn’s flight at LAX when six to eight officers came on board, told her to keep her glasses on, and then threw her into a scrum of paparazzi as Spears escaped. Her lawyer stated:

They didn’t ask her, they told her. They said, ‘You’re going to help us,’ and she was stunned, just obeying the police. The only time they mentioned Jamie Lynn’s name was on the escalator, three seconds before paparazzi surrounded her.”

How much is it worth to be an involuntary Jamie Lee Spears? $100,000 according to Eskridge and her lawyer. (Frankly, I would do it for half of that but no one has asked. I wonder how much a decoy for Justice Scalia would bring?)

The obvious defense here is that Eskridge consented to the ruse. This is one reason why her counsel is emphasizing that she was not told about her purpose only second before the scrum.

My question, however, is who was impersonating the police officers? The use of a civilian in such a role is remarkably stupid since, even if she consents, there is a chance of injury. Moreover, consent may be rejected due to a failure to disclose or understand such risks. Having said that, it is unclear how humiliating this exercise would be unless neighbors now believe that Eskridge was a pregnant teen mother.

For the full story, click here.

9 thoughts on “Paparazzi Bait: Cops Accused of Forcing Woman to Be Decoy for Jamie Lynn Spear”

  1. Former Federal LEO:

    Former Federal LEO:

    Former Federal LEO:

    YOU POSTED A LINK TO A FRAUDULENT STORY CLAIMING ISRAELIS ATROCITIES AND YOU OWE AN APOLOGY!

    YOU POSTED A LINK TO A FRAUDULENT STORY CLAIMING ISRAELIS ATROCITIES AND YOU OWE AN APOLOGY!

    YOU POSTED A LINK TO A FRAUDULENT STORY CLAIMING ISRAELIS ATROCITIES AND YOU OWE AN APOLOGY!

    Liberal Blogosphere Duped By 3-Year-Old ‘Gaza Bombing Video’
    By Noel Sheppard | January 5, 2009 – 15:17

    Just how badly do many liberal bloggers want to depict Israelis as heartless killers and Hamas as poor defenseless victims?

    On Sunday, a more than three year old video of an accidental munitions truck explosion at a Palestinian rally in September 2005 was spread around the liberal blogosphere as footage of an Israeli attack on Gaza on January 3, 2009.

    Two prominent leftwing websites — Raw Story and Democratic Underground — displayed this video for hours before a poster at Reddit exposed the hoax (h/t NBer Blazer).

  2. Maybe we can get this lady to impersonate the trolls that are multiplying.
    This is a bizarre case that could only have happened in LA. I agree that it is really difficult to say NO to the police and not get your head knocked in.

  3. Liberal Blogosphere Duped By 3-Year-Old ‘Gaza Bombing Video’
    By Noel Sheppard | January 5, 2009 – 15:17

    Just how badly do many liberal bloggers want to depict Israelis as heartless killers and Hamas as poor defenseless victims?

    On Sunday, a more than three year old video of an accidental munitions truck explosion at a Palestinian rally in September 2005 was spread around the liberal blogosphere as footage of an Israeli attack on Gaza on January 3, 2009.

    Two prominent leftwing websites — Raw Story and Democratic Underground — displayed this video for hours before a poster at Reddit exposed the hoax (h/t NBer Blazer).

    Charles Johnson at Little Green Footballs reported early Sunday:

    A gruesome propaganda video uploaded to LiveLeak that purported to show the aftermath of an IDF attack on civilians in Gaza turned out to be a fraud—it actually shows the results of an accidental explosion of a truck full of Hamas rockets at a Palestinian rally.

    This didn’t stop the video from reaching the top spot on reddit.com and gaining more than 2,000 up votes, because reddit.com is absolutely infested with antisemites and terror supporters: GRAPHIC Video of Israel Defense Force’s attack on Gaza civilian market — originally uploaded on & banned by YouTube (NSFW) : politics.

    Raw Story issued a correction Sunday:

    On Sunday, RAW STORY ran video of a bombing in Gaza purported to be recent footage leaked from an exiled Palestinian blogger. We removed the video from the site early Sunday and issued a correction but the original was deleted in a database without the actual html file being removed, so the original persisted through Monday morning without our notice.

    The footage is the aftermath of a devastating bombing taking place in a market, said to have been taken on Saturday. According to Haitham Sabbah, it was taken “immediately after a terrorist Israeli air strike hit a busy market where kids with their mothers and fathers were searching for food to eat from one of the local markets early on Saturday 03, Jan 2009.”

    Raw Story has removed its original article on this matter, but Question Everything still has the text:

    As Israel’s IDF wages it’s [sic] own “media war” via Twitter and YouTube, uncensored footage from Palestine has been completely blacked out in the US.

    Until now.

    Saturday, before Israel launched a full-scale invasion of Gaza, a Palestinian with a camera witnessed a devastating bombing. His video shows the brutal, bloody results of an air strike on what appears to be a civilian area.

    In the footage, scores of bodies – men, women and children – lay strewn about a Gaza market as abject chaos spirals around them. Some struggle to their feet, covered in concrete powder and blood, as others assess their injuries or join the effort to carry away wounded.

    Within moments, men in camouflage holding automatic weapons and RPGs assert a growing number among the citizenry. The men, presumably affiliated with Hamas, appear to be helping with crowd control and medical response.

    The source of this video was Haitham Sabbah, a self-proclaimed “Palestinian activist and blogger.”

    Although he too has updated his blog to reflect his error, this is what he originally wrote concerning this video:

    This video clip was taken with a mobile camera immediately after a terrorist Israeli air strike hit a busy market where kids with their mothers and fathers were searching for foot to eat from one of the local markets early on Saturday 03, Jan 2009, Gaza.

    As you will see, there are no words to describe the terror of the Jewish state of Israhell. This is why Israel is continuously refusing to allow foreign correspondence and reporters from entering Gaza.

    Please spread the video widely. Let the world see what their news TV channels won’t show about reality of Israel. (YouTube deleted the video minutes after it was uploaded, but it is worth trying again).

    Get the code for the video to embed on your blog from: http://sabbah.blip.tv/#1642223.

    I guess that’s all it takes to get anti-Israeli propaganda spread throughout the liberal blogosphere these days.

    How sad.

  4. Professor

    I was hoping this would be the one blog in the world where I escape Brittany and Paris! Still the legality of using her seems suspect. Can you really refuse the cops nowadays? The option of saying NO isn’t really there is it? Kidnapped by police. Clearly, they overstepped. $100k worth, no, but…

  5. Big Fella,

    Professional head-shots and an audition, same as anyone else going for the part.

  6. Imaginative but stupid, but what do you expect from cops in the greater Hollywood area?

  7. Scalia????

    Jeezus, Jonathon. I ain’t no gay boy, but you do look far better than that monster.

    😉

    No way you would pass…

    Besides, I would do it for a sawbuck (we’re hurting down here in Tennessee).

  8. There are multiple layers of stupidity here:

    1. Why are the paparazzi following somebody who’s only claim to fame is being related to somebody who was somewhat famous?

    2. How could the police involved here think that commandeering a civilian as a decoy is in any way justified?

    3. Are L.A. tax-payer dollars being used to pay for the private protection for celebrities and also for the family members of celebrities?

    4. In reference to the first again, c’mon paparazzi … Jamie Lynn Spears? Really?

Comments are closed.