-Submitted by David Drumm (Nal), Guest Blogger
In Indiana, an intoxicated passenger in a car pulled over by police, is guilty of public intoxication.
Indiana code defines public intoxication as being “in a public place or a place of public resort in a state of intoxication caused by . . . use of alcohol . . . .”
In the case of Moore v. State, Brenda Moore had had a couple of beers and a sober friend needed a ride and Moore offered her car and accompanied the friend as a passenger. An Indianapolis Metropolitan Police officer pulled the car over because it lacked a working license plate light. The officer discovered that the driver did not have a valid driver’s license. Both the driver and Moore were arrested, and Moore was charged with public intoxication, a class B misdemeanor. Moore was found guilty at a bench trial and she appealed.
The Court of Appeals of Indiana, in a 2-1 decision, reversed the conviction. The Indiana Supreme Court affirmed the conviction. Moore’s argument that her conviction “violates the spirit of the public intoxication statute, and the policy behind its enactment” did not sway the Indiana Supreme Court which wrote:
Whether conduct proscribed by a criminal law should be excused under certain circumstances on grounds of public policy is a matter for legislative evaluation and statutory revision if appropriate. The judicial function is to apply the laws as enacted by the legislature.
The Indiana Supreme Court relied on Miles v. State for its ruling. In Miles v. State a man in his tractor-trailer cab parked alongside the highway with the window rolled down was in a public place for purposes of the public intoxication statute. One distinguishing feature between Miles and Moore, is that Moore was seized for Fourth Amendment purposes, see Brendlin v. California.
In the Moore dissent, Rucker, J. is concerned by the majority’s “declaring that the inside of a closed vehicle traveling along a highway is a public place.”
The Moore case is similar to Martin v. State, a case where the police arrested an intoxicated man in his home, took him outside to a highway, and then charged him with being drunk on a public highway. The Alabama Court of Appeals ruled that for public intoxication, “a voluntary appearance is presupposed.” A person in not guilty of an offense where liability is based on involuntary conduct.
The Moore case could have serious ramifications for those considering riding in a taxi while intoxicated.
H/T: Orin Kerr.
I have been browsing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be a lot more useful than ever before.
You’ve observed lots of purse styles previously however exactly what are you aware concerning the Michael kors purses? If you don’t learn about all of them, indeed they’re known as because catchy purses. They’re really distinctive, historical, fascinating, incredible, magical, reliable, expert, inexpensive as well as long lasting purses versions, getting your own eye past the actual creativity. Presently Michael kors purses can be found in their very own unique designs as well as designs within the globally marketplace inside least expensive cost prices. The actual creative designers associated with Michael kors purses produce as well as create your own purses having a unique treatment, commitment, dedication, professionalism and reliability, as well as personal inspiration. More to the point, these people frequently make use of lamination methods (Glossy/Matte completing) because of that your personal Michael kors purses appear really distinctive as well as catchy away from personal creativity. Significantly on the internet purses store provides you with inexpensive Michael kors purses globally inside a the majority of expert as well as devoted method.
Some exceptions may apply:
– if the car is a limo
– if the passenger is an employee of the prison state
– if the judge is in a good mood the day you appear before him/her
Police state.
mmc,
It is already done in lots of jurisdictions…..
Why is 2 2 1925 a good year? Was it not the year of the year of the “Law of Property Act?” Conveyancing of Real Property in England and Wales? What is your point Maggot?
FFLEO
i remember seeing a story about four people being injured in Iraq by a roadside IUD.
meme
drink some milk
2 2 1925 it was a very good year!
And here we have all of the intellectuals gathered. I must be still tripping from acid. The damn driver did not have a valid license, the passenger was drunk. What is the officer supposed to do, give the keys to a drunk? He did the only right thing. Jesus H Christ, you people whine about shit you have no control over. Were you there? Cry Baby’s.
How long before a police officer or prosecutor uses this ruling to defend a warrant less, consent less, probable cause less search of a defendant’s car?
FFLEO,
🙂 I can see where that adds further confusion to the issue. Especially since the sex in cars certainly involves pubic places even though the public places is debatable. And let’s not forget all the trouble those Roman got into fighting the Pubic Wars. Hopefully we can resolve this issue without getting Carthage involved.