Congress, Constitutional Law, Media, Politics, Society

Democrats Introduce Privacy Bill Before Election . . . Obama Administration Reportedly Opposes Privacy Protections After Election

Many civil libertarians refused to vote for President Barack Obama given his dismal record in the expansion of the security state, surveillance law, and assertions of unchecked executive power. The Administration went into radio silence on such issues during the campaign in an effort to win back liberals (as they did on medical marijuana) only to announce after the election that they would resume the same policies. The Democratic leadership has shown the same duplicity on civil liberties for years — including hiding knowledge of the Bush torture program and surveillance programs as well as blocking any meaningful investigations into those alleged crimes. Now, some Democrats have reportedly put that hypocrisy on public display again. Senator Patrick Leahy introduced the bill which, as originally written, required warrants for the reading of emails and was heralded by Democrats during the campaign as their showing of fealty to privacy and civil liberties. The Justice Department then took the bill and flipped it to serve as a sweeping denial of privacy rights . . . and some Senators are pushing on passage now that the election is over. The bill includes warrantless access to university email systems.

The re-written bill now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail for over 22 federal agencies with only a subpoena and no probable cause. State and local agencies will have access to email system, including university emails. Internet providers will have to give notice if they are thinking of informing customers of access given to such agencies. Such notification can be postponed by up to 360 days. While not speaking for his Democratic colleagues, Leahy says that he does not support some of the exceptions. Leahy was once an ally for civil libertarians but is now viewed with great suspicion given his authorship of the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act as well as the Protect IP Act. An article in The New Republic concluded Leahy’s work on the Patriot Act “appears to have made the bill less protective of civil liberties.” He also inserted controversial portions of the Patriot Act. Leahy however insists that he will oppose rollbacks. Yet, the Justice Department has objected to protections in the bill according to reports and some Senators are pushing for the restrictive version of the bill. Leahy’s staff says that he will push a draft closer to the original in committee. [Update: CNET is standing by its story
and says that Leahy only backdown after criticism following its story and that Leahy is abandoning amendments of his own making].

There is no denial of the opposition to the privacy protections by the Administration.

However, the Obama Administration is quoted as objecting that privacy protections would have an “adverse impact” on national security investigations. Democratic members doing the bidding of the Administration will find likely allies in the GOP, including Senator Chuck Grassley who has warned about the dangers of too much privacy.

The control of the security establishment over both White House and Congress appears now completely unchecked and unabashed. After securing reelection, President Obama wasted no time in returning to his prior record of disregarding privacy and civil liberties concerns. Once again, both the media and liberals are muted in any response when the same re-writing of the bill would have produced outcries under the Bush Administration. Of course, Obama can certainly point out that liberals should have had no illusions. On torture, military tribunals, surveillance, undeclared wars, and other issues, Obama made himself painfully clear. His campaign was one of personality over principle and only the personality remains.

[UPDATE: after the CNET story gained national attention, Leahy’s people went into full action in denying that Leahy supports warrantless access to email communications. However, there is still no denial of the quoted Administration officials opposing the privacy protections. Moreover, there is confirmation that a number of versions — including some with these exceptions to the warrant requirement — are being circulated. The bill can be changed in Committee or on the floor. Likewise, if the civil liberties community rallies to oppose warrantless searches, the Administration could seek to kill the bill or gut the provision to leave the status quo.]

Source: CNET

127 thoughts on “Democrats Introduce Privacy Bill Before Election . . . Obama Administration Reportedly Opposes Privacy Protections After Election”

  2. you are really a just right webmaster. The site loading velocity is incredible.
    It kind of feels that you are doing any unique trick.
    In addition, The contents are masterwork. you have performed a great process on this topic!

  4. I used to be recommended this web site by way of my cousin.
    I am no longer positive whether this submit is written
    via him as nobody else know such precise approximately my
    problem. You’re incredible! Thank you!

  5. What i do not realize is if truth be told how you are now not actually much
    more well-favored than you might be right now. You’re so intelligent.

    You realize thus significantly in relation to this matter, produced me in my opinion imagine it
    from numerous numerous angles. Its like women and men don’t seem to be interested
    except it’s something to accomplish with Woman gaga!
    Your individual stuffs great. Always care for it up!

  6. You are so interesting! I don’t believe I’ve read through
    a single thing like this before. So great to discover someone with unique thoughts on this
    issue. Really.. thank you for starting this up. This web site is one thing that is needed on the internet,
    someone with a bit of originality!

  8. The two murdered troopers, Power and Cahill, were men from
    good Irish families. The breaking-in of young wild steers to
    function inside team seemed somewhat cruel. After debating the situation and being of the opinion that the
    Government had no power to reimburse, they submitted the truth for
    the Crown Law Office for decision.

  10. It’s true that the consumption part might be private value, 2011 endowment returns it’s dfinitely the best strategy.
    All bidders must bee 18 years old or older, in possession of
    the property or the actual rental value, whichever is the highest estimate bbid the most.

  11. The Shoes No. 7 merchandise won for overall performance.
    In fact for many parents this can be a solution to show
    their chldren which they enjoy them. All Indian tribes wore moccasins and the designs varied with
    each group.

  12. **Cecil 1, December 18, 2013 at 9:52 pm

    I don’t know if it’s just me or if perhaps everyone else experiencing issues with your
    website. It appears like some of the written text on your posts are running off the screen.

    Can somebody else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening
    to them as well? This might be a issue with my web
    browser because I’ve had this happen previously.
    Thanks
    **

    Cecil,

    Get you a few more girlfriends to sleep with, like a DBAs or some gals on the India Help Desk. 🙂

  13. I don’t know if it’s just me or if perhaps everyone else experiencing issues with your
    website. It appears like some of the written text on your posts are running off the screen.

    Can somebody else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening
    to them as well? This might be a issue with my web
    browser because I’ve had this happen previously.
    Thanks

  15. I absolutely love your blog and find a lot of your post’s to be exactly what I’m looking for.

    Do you offer guest writers to write content for you?
    I wouldn’t mind composing a post or elaborating on most of the subjects you write
    regarding here. Again, awesome site!

  18. I have been browsing on-line more than 3 hours nowadays, yet I by no means found any fascinating
    article like yours. It is lovely worth sufficient for me.
    In my view, if all website owners and bloggers made just right content material
    as you probably did, the internet will likely be
    a lot more helpful than ever before.

  19. It is very often practiced on leisure areas, botanical gardening purposes
    and also the significant and picturesque the different parts of metropolis.
    During this loving visual effect built special wedding
    event pix.

    kliknij

Comments are closed.