By Mark Esposito, Guest Blogger
Bobby Jindral, Governor of Louisiana, has caused quite a stir in Republican circles calling on the party to throw off the mantle of the stupid and prejudiced among us. Pleading for an end to dumbed-down conservatism, the former golden boy of the party (before a disastrous 2009 televised reply to President Obama’s address to Congress) begged the party to turn away from being the champion of the “haves” and, most importantly, jettisoning its appeal to the lowbrow of society.
It is no secret we had a number of Republicans damage our brand this year with offensive, bizarre comments — enough of that. It’s not going to be the last time anyone says something stupid within our party, but it can’t be tolerated within our party. We’ve also had enough of this dumbed-down conservatism. We need to stop being simplistic, we need to trust the intelligence of the American people and we need to stop insulting the intelligence of the voters.
That sentiment is being echoed in many of the cloistered salons of the GOP. Even bomb throwing (but weirdly cerebral) Newt Gingrich, responding to Mitt Romney’s childish comment that he lost the election to Obama because of bribes gifts to core Democratic constituencies, seems poised to make a philosophical change of course. “I just think it’s nuts,” Gingrich said on ABC. “I mean, first of all, it’s insulting. The job of a political leader in part is to understand the people. If we can’t offer a better future that is believable to more people, we’re not going to win.” Amen.
The transition appears broad-based and involves more than a little soul-searching for the political party whose victories in the 2010 mid-term elections seemed to leave it poised for a complete take over of the government this time around. The shock of November 6th seems sincere enough and could lead to something we haven’t seen in conservative circles for some time – a push to make the party one of ideas and not just demagoguery.
Not so long ago — before the party was held hostage by that tax-pledging Rumpelstiltskin of the Right, Grover Nordquist, — Republicans felt free to represent conservative values and the nation’s interests. Imagine a Republican congressperson saying today, “I am a man of fixed and unbending principles, the first of which is to be flexible at all times.” That was the late Everett Dirksen, the horn-rimmed Senator from Illinois, and one of the men directly responsible for the Herculean efforts to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Open Housing Act of 1968. Both laws decidedly liberal, decidedly unpopular, and decidedly needed to realize the American dream of social equality.
Voting for cloture against the southern Democrats who filibustered the measures, Dirksen told the Senate:
Victor Hugo wrote in his diary substantially this sentiment, ‘Stronger than all the armies is an idea whose time has come.’ The time has come for equality of opportunity in sharing of government, in education, and in employment. It must not be stayed or denied.’
That’s intellectual gravitas not seen in the GOP in some time. Compare it to the rhetoric from the current Republican intelligentsia, this time in the person of South Carolina Lt. Gov. André Bauer arguing against the Food Stamp Program and free school lunches for poor children:
My grandmother was not a highly educated woman, but she told me as a small child to quit feeding stray animals. You know why? Because they breed. You’re facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person ample food supply. They will reproduce, especially ones that don’t think too much further than that. And so what you’ve got to do is you’ve got to curtail that type of behavior. They don’t know any better.
It doesn’t take a physicist to see how far the party’s grip on the American soul has slipped or how fast.
What can a resurrected GOP accomplish? Here are some ideas:
1. Less Government Intrusion Into Our Lives – The GOP has a traditional and noble role of advocating smaller government with an eye on protecting the property and privacy of its citizens. It was Dirksen who said, “It is the expansion of Federal power, about which I wish to express my alarm. How easily we embrace such business.” Few people would disagree that endless (sometimes mindless) government regulations and bureaucratic red tape are social ills that an effective government could end. Henry David Thoreau’s observation that, “[t]he best government is that which governs least” is as true to the American psyche now as it was in 1849.
2. Strong National Defense — The world is still a dangerous place as Einstein used to say. Whatever you think about the military-industrial complex, it’s worth remembering it is that institution that’s kept us safe and free for decades although we can certainly debate the costs of that security. It’s also worth remembering that for all our flaws, America remains the only nation in the history of the world who having once conquered foreign lands promptly returned it to the indigenous people to govern. A strong America means some sense of justice in the world if only an imperfect one.
3. Protection of Privacy – A political party founded on conservative principles could be in the forefront of protecting the privacy of its citizens. Women’s issues should be the cutting edge of that philosophy especially those relating to control over their own bodies. True conservatism means less government interference in personal decisions and a rejuvenated Republican Party could lead on this issue with perfect philosophical consistency.
4.Advocating For Small Business – The backbone for the American economy remains small business. According to the SBA, fifty percent of all American jobs remain in small business (defined as any entity employing 500 workers of fewer). Most importantly small business fill niches in the labor market that are under-served. For example small businesses employ greater proportions of Hispanics than large businesses (65% versus 35%). Also small businesses hire more high school degree or lower attaining workers as well as more of the elderly and disabled than large business. While small business does not match large business in campaign contributions it is the largest growth area in the economy and worthy of support from a party openly dedicated to capitalism.
These are just a few of the areas where bona fide conservative principles aid rather than detract from the national dialogue. A return to them, and away from the religion-based rhetoric that got the GOP scorched in the last national election, would mean a stronger party and a stronger nation.
For the two-party system to work you really do need two viable political parties who are willing to both advocate and cooperate. The GOP has done a poor job of both. If demographics truly are destiny in politics, the GOP will have to change or die. For the sake of all of us, let’s hope they change.
~Mark Esposito, Guest Blogger
Update 7:46 p.m.: Is the dike breaking? South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham has added his name the growing number of Republicans rebuking Grover Norquist’s no tax hike pledge. Graham joins Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) in disavowing the now almost two decade old pledge. “I’m willing to generate revenue,” Graham said on ABC. “It’s fair to ask my party to put revenue on the table. We’re below historic averages.” New York Republican Congressman Peter King has also refused to honor the pledge bushing off any of Norquist’s threats of retaliation saying, “A pledge you signed 20 years ago, 18 years ago, is for that Congress.” Norquist was nonplussed and blasted Chambliss. “If he wants to change his mind and become a tax increaser so we don’t have to reform government, he needs to have that conversation with the people of Georgia,” Mr. Norquist said on CNN’s “The Situation Room.” Chambliss retorted that “I care more about my country than I do about a 20-year-old pledge.”
This one is going to get good.
Source: CNN
Gene,
Not going down that path today because it is the same path that leads to the corner I mentioned. A blind spot.
Kind of like our disagreement over Pelosi.
” The steady erosion of civil and human rights is what led many a dictatorship into existence.”
I believe this steady erosion began in our courts. Our courts stank to high heaven even before the other two branches took the plunge into the sewer. The final act started when the US Supreme Court took the presidential election away from the people in 2000 and appointed a president who threw us into war and nullified our civil rights at every turn, also consolidating the tyranny of that very court that appointed him. It was a dirty business and I frankly don’t see us coming back from the brink it drew us toward. Also, about Obama: Do you expect a nice guy to win the White House under those circumstances, or now, or ever? Nothing counts any more but power. “Hundred Years of Solitude.”
Republicans will control the house until well after 2020 when the new census comes out. If they don’t start accepting asians,hispanics and african americans as real americans, they are screwed. That is unless they can manage to further suppress the vote. Republicans still control the Supreme Court also, and they may dismantle the Voting Rights Act.
Blouise,
The broader point is this: That the GOP has become the party of stupid is important but ancillary to the point that both parties have become the party of pissing on the Constitution which is both stupid and antithetical to the rule of law in addition to being myopic and shortsighted. The steady erosion of civil and human rights is what led many a dictatorship into existence. Whichever party is smart enough and strong enough to reverse that erosion will be a big winner with the people but that isn’t the path to consolidated power, but rather pluralistic power and in our increasingly polarized partisan environment, no one wants to share power. This is part and parcel of the comment about the dangers of single party government.
Blouise, Axelrod and the rest of the campaign performed beautifully. Rove and the republicans are no match.
Tony C. 1, November 25, 2012 at 12:19 pm
@Bettykath: It may have been the Green party, but the word “Republican” is the key. It has to be the Republican party simply because of the ballot access and stiffness of mind for far too many voters………………………
I agree with your intellectual exercise.
Sorry, no corner for me. I still think this election was a lose big/lose small proposition but a loss is a loss nonetheless. And the biggest loser remains the Constitution and the protections it once afforded citizens. Nothing happy or accidental about that.
Divorcing the platform and policies from the tactics that got the enablers in place is throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Ego may be what helped him win the campaign, but that doesn’t change that the ego required of one pushing a unitary executive agenda is still the same ego that won the campaign.
Now go sit with Tony in the happy accident corner.
Gene,
You know darn well I was talking election tactics.
Simple fact. Just because Obama is better than “the other guy” doesn’t mean he’s a peach of a President. What he did was wrong – Constitutionally and ethically.
Gene,
Nice spin
“If Warren ran in 2010 she might have lost, too.” (SwM)
But she didn’t. The throw-away candidate did.
That is one of the big differences between the two party’s leadership … long-term gain thinking versus short-term gain thinking. Obama thinking versus Rove thinking.
Yeah, it sure takes a healthy ego to say you have the power to execute citizens without judicial due process and the multiple Constitutional violations such a claim entails. Although in that context, healthy is used as a measure of abundance, not as a statement of quality or of character.
SwM,
I believe those who dislike Obama have bought into their own misconceptions of just how smart and calculating the man is. These are the same folk who just can’t understand Clinton’s continued popularity.
There are 2 men leading the Democratic Party … Obama and Clinton … and nothing happens without their input.
The one thing that happened this election that impressed me more than anything else was Clinton’s final 2 week push trumpeting Obama’s message. Any individual serving in that office has to have a strong ego but, and this is what I took from that push … Obama’s is also a healthy one. He is not good at pushing his own message but Clinton is a master at message pushing. So Obama stepped back and let Clinton work his magic.
(I wonder if we’ll see the pay back for that in 2016 … 😉 )
Swwarthmore,
I do not share in your prediction that the GOP will pick up Senate seats in 2014. Not if they do not change their ways with the Tea Party wingnuts.
Tony C.,
I thought you referred to Warren as the happy accident. Must have misread you.
Tony C, I agree with that but I don’t think they are there yet. People like Bloomberg might be but not the Texas Republican Party. Dewhurst has appointed fundamentalist teapartyers to chair committees for the upcoming legislative session. I hear Ohio republicans are not paying any attention to the election results either.
2. Strong National Defense — The world is still a dangerous place as Einstein used to say. Whatever you think about the military-industrial complex, it’s worth remembering it is that institution that’s kept us safe and free for decades although we can certainly debate the costs of that security. It’s also worth remembering that for all our flaws, America remains the only nation in the history of the world who having once conquered foreign lands promptly returned it to the indigenous people to govern. A strong America means some sense of justice in the world if only an imperfect one.
*****
Our government and its military-industrial complex has gotten us involved in unnecessary wars that have killed and injured thousands of military personnel and innocent civilians. We seem willing to maintain a bloated military budget while the rest of the country falls apart–and while we keep whittling away our civil liberties. Is that our tradeoff for maintaining our safety? Or might there be a better way to accomplish that goal? What is our definition of a strong America?
“Some sense of justice”: What does that mean?
I have to agree with old nurse regarding the indigenous people of our country.
@Swarthmore: I am not a Republican, I am not going to help them organize anything. I am talking about an intellectual exercise. If they self-immolate in a paroxysm of religious fervor, it will just be another string of losses that serve as more evidence they have to change.