More Heat Than Light: UCLA Students Disrupt Federalist Society Event

The slogan of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) may be “Let there be light,” but a recent Federalist Society event produced more heat than light in the law school. Students and faculty wanted to hear from James Percival, general counsel of the Department of Homeland Security, on a host of issues. However, students organized to prevent others from hearing from Percival, who was drowned out by profanity and cellphones at the event.

The incident seemed a repeat of the infamous disruption of Judge Duncan of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit at Stanford Law School three years ago.

On Tuesday night, over 150 protesters gathered outside the event chanting criticisms of the Trump administration, including “No ICE, No KKK, No Fascist U.S.A.”  Protests outside of events are generally protected speech. Indeed, such protests are an important element in fostering free speech values on our campuses.

The problem is that protesters also organized to disrupt the event from inside Royce Hall. Students booed Percival throughout his talk and held up profane and disgusting signs. Some had their phones constantly ringing, making it difficult for others to hear Percival. It is, of course, fine to go to the event and ask tough questions or disagree with the speaker. These students were drowning out the speaker with shouts and phones.

The law school was aware of the preparations to disrupt the event. Groups circulated posts, hung posters, and circulated online petitions that said that even allowing the general counsel to speak with students was triggering and “threatening.”

One group called By Any Means Necessary (BAMN), called for mass protests over allowing the views of the DHS to be heard on campus. A flyer declared, “UCLA must not give representatives of ICE and the Trump Administration a base to organize Trump’s campaign of racist ethnic cleansing of the U.S. and the Middle East.”

Another posting called upon students to “Stop the fascist takeover of the American federal government! Stop the Trump police state!” Other flyers portrayed the event with allowing Nazis to speak on campus.

The UCLA Latine Law Students Association said that the event endangered students, insisting that allowing Percival to speak “utterly disregards the safety of our undocumented students and minimizes the great harm and trauma that has been inflicted on our communities over the decades.”

It further maintained that:

“By giving Mr. Percival a platform, The Federalist Society and UCLA Law are legitimizing and normalizing racially discriminatory policies that are actively harming both UCLA students and our broader community.”

It is all-too-familiar rhetoric. Groups claim to be triggered or threatened by opposing views and then use those claims to justify disruption and obstruction of the speaker.

The students were clear that anyone speaking from the Trump Administration would be subject to the same disruption: “UCLA must not give representatives of ICE and the Trump Administration a base to organize Trump’s campaign of racist ethnic cleansing of the U.S. and the Middle East.”

These students find the expression of opposing views to be intolerable. Rather than engage the speaker with a substantive and civil discussion of policies and practices, they believe that spewing profanities, heckling, and drowning out a speaker are the proper way to engage those who hold different viewpoints.

I commend Mr. Percival and the Federalist Society for their willingness to expose themselves to such abuse in an effort to foster a dialogue on these important issues. Students had the opportunity to exchange viewpoints with one of the highest-ranked officials in the DHS. That was what these protesters were intent on stopping with their shouts and cellphone tactics.

What is most notable about the videotape is that the students are clearly shown and identifiable. However, the law school’s statement on the incident did not include a commitment to hold these students accountable. It merely noted that “The law school worked with the Office of Campus and Community Safety in advance to support the event and uphold the university’s commitment to the free exchange of ideas.”

If so, it utterly failed in that commitment. These tactics are expressly prohibited by the university as “so disruptive so as to effectively silence” a speaker. The fact that the speaker continued to try to speak (and was able to do so after a walkout) does not change the fact that these students succeeded in disrupting and effectively silencing the speaker during the event.

The incident is reminiscent of the earlier incident at Northwestern University, where the university condemned but did nothing about students who entered a class and forced it to be canceled over a guest speaker from ICE. It was the lack of any action, not the condemnation, that left the greatest impact on the students.

The same full-throated message was sent at Stanford, where no student was punished, and the university made everyone watch a meaningless video that was openly mocked. One year after the incident, a majority of Stanford students believed shouting down Judge Duncan was warranted.

UCLA has shown little interest in restoring viewpoint diversity on its campus.  This is the university that has paid for a series of radical “resident activists” to lecture students. It appears to have made activism a central part of its educational mission.

The same week that the law school event was disrupted, the Undergraduate Students Association Council “condemned” the holding of an event featuring a hostage who survived the Oct. 7 massacre. The group declared the event as “elevating a single narrative” and obscuring “what has been widely identified by human rights advocates as a genocide in Gaza.”

In this context, the law school controversy is hardly surprising. UCLA remains a deeply intolerant environment for many speakers and students.

We will now wait to see whether the University, the Law School and Dean Michael Waterstone are willing to discipline the students who disrupted this event. This type of premeditated, overt misconduct reflects an enabling culture fostered by the faculty.

If UCLA wants more light than heat, it must start enforcing (rather than just mouthing) its commitment to the free expression of viewpoints.

342 thoughts on “More Heat Than Light: UCLA Students Disrupt Federalist Society Event”

  1. Most important of all, make sure more killers can cross our borders to smash in more skulls, leaving thick bloody brain tissue, proving to wok that they won.

  2. Today Trump told a reporter “don’t rush me” when asked how long the war he started would last. He pointed to WW 2 taking over 4 years and Viet Nam taking even longer. The DOD is asking for billions to purchase thousands of drones. Coincidentally, Don, Jr and Eric Trump are heavily invested in a company that makes drones and have obtained government contracts with the companies with which they are involved.

    I recall the frantic pearl-clutching over Hunter Biden, especially from Turley, even though Hunter Biden never did any business with the federal government and, despite extensive efforts by Republicans, no influence peddling was ever proven.

    The Trump family corruption is open and obvious—MAGA media has nothing to say about it. It’s in the financial interest of the Trump family to keep the Iran war going for as long as possible—to sell more drones. UAE, a rival of Iran that purchased billions of Trump crypto, wants the war to continue too, as does Israel.

    As to the protest against Homeland Security, the majority of the American people oppose ICE and the outrageous tactics they use against migrants— after lying about only arresting the worst of the worst— they are disappearing entire families. They murdered two Americans and have gotten away with it— so far.

    People are afraid to leave their homes and send their children to school. The funding Republicans are trying to get for Homeland Security could be used to provide healthcare subsidies for the millions Republicans took away. it could be used for free lunch for poor kids and could pay for dental care for everyone on Medicare. It boils down to a value judgment for what the American people want their tax dollars to pay for. Republicans are on the wrong side of this issue. Downplaying the cruelty and intent of Homeland Security to round up anyone who looks Hispanic, to incarcerate them in windowless warehouses with inhumane conditions and to intimidate people just trying to live their lives and feed their families as some kind of valid alternative viewpoint is disingenuous. What Homeland Security does is immoral and wildly unpopular. Good for the students.

    1. ^ Another Gigi 10,000,000-word lunacy dump of MAGA MAGA MAGA, blah blah blah, that nobody will read ^

    2. I’d pay a trillion, happily, to prevent Iran from completing even one 10,000,000 ton thermonuclear weapon, You Damn Fool

    3. George Washington sold lad to the federal government as president

      you can not grasp the difference between facilitating bribery and ordinary free exchange.

      This conflict has lasted 6weeks

      People are already losing interest

      Americans are not dying in significant numbers
      Iranian civilians are not dying in significant numbers

      Bad people are getting killed

      The price of gas is still below the average for bidens 4yrs
      It is about what we paid when Obama was president

      Regardless this will end and the worst case is a civil war in Iran
      As bad as that might be it is far better than the status quo ante

    4. No one ever said only the worst of the worst are being deported

      That is the priority
      That is who ice is actively looking for

      But anyone in the US illegally will and MUST be deported if caught

      That is our law
      If you do not like that get congress to change it

      Last poll I saw the majority of Americans still want absolutely all illegal immigrants deported

      You don’t – fine, get the law changed

      I expect and the rule of law requires that government enforced the laws we pass

      Anything less is immoral and lawless

      I will support you in changing bad laws
      Though I doubt we have much common ground on what laws are bad
      And that is the point
      I have to live and obey laws you passed that I do not like
      You are morally obligated to do the same

      The alternatives are tyranny and anarchy

      You rant about ice
      But they are merely enforcing the law

      Did you learn nothing from demonizing soldiers in the Vietnam war ?

      Go pi$$ on people who are not just doing their job enforcing the law

    5. Federal agencies rarely have overall positive ratings
      But currently with 42% support DzhS is actually the most popular federal agency

    6. Illegal skeins can feed their families in their own countries

      We have defeated starvation
      No one anywhere in the world starves except for political reasons

      Today there is not a nation that could not feed Its own people without aide if it wanted too

    7. I love windows
      They are not a right
      There is no right to be in the us if you are not a citizen

      While the us even now is the most welcoming nation in the world

      We are not obligated to take everyone who wishes to come

      If you do not like that
      Change the law

    8. Detained is not incarcerated

      Detained illegal skeins can be released to their home at anytime
      They remain detained only if they wish against the odds to try to remain in the us

    9. “People are afraid to leave their homes and send their children to school.”

      Are they? Name those people.

      Voices in your head don’t count.

  3. As of April 2026, Marine Corps Lt. Gen. James Adams, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told US lawmakers that Iran still “retains thousands” of missiles and one-way attack drones. Despite heavy US/Israeli airstrikes in early 2026, Iran’s remaining arsenal poses a continued threat to US and partner forces in the Middle East.

    I THOUGHT we destroyed their capacity to fight.

    1. I guess they just forgot to use them when they would’ve been most useful. D’oh, maybe they’ll remember next time.

    2. AI Overview

      As of April 2026, estimates suggest Iran has roughly 1,400 to 1,500 ballistic missiles remaining, down from an estimated pre-war inventory of around 3,000. While 60% to 70% of launchers and missiles are claimed to be destroyed, with over 500 launched, Iran maintains significant strike capability, potentially having thousands of drones and lower-range missiles.

  4. Mamdani had a smug smile on his face when he made his little video about the new pied-à-terre tax. In that video, he singled out, by name, Ken Griffin, who owns a very expensive condo in midtown but doesn’t live there most of the time. Griffin is the founder of Citadel, and still owns 85% of the company. Mamdani felt very good about heaping shame on Griffin’s head, while Griffin was not present at the filming and thus had no way to give an answer to Mamdani’s implication that he was not carrying his fair share of the tax burden.

    Turns out Griffin was about to pour $6 billion into a new midtown project, creating 6,000 highly paid construction jobs and supporting the creation of more than 15,000 permanent jobs in mid-town. Griffin has contributed $650 million in charitable donations supporting New York City residents. Also, over the past five years, Citadel principals and team members – including non-NYC residents – have paid nearly $2.3 billion dollars in city and state taxes.

    Griffin is now reconsidering whether he wants to go forward with the project. How is this not typical of liberals? Destroy a city with a smug smile. Feel good about sticking it to the rich man, with the result that the plebes suffer when the man pulls his money out. That is not smart. It’s moronic. And everyone suffers so that the left-wing politician can feel real smug about what a clever guy he is.

    1. If you think it is such a crime to have a smug smile, then you are more than welcome to call the proper authorities to report this smile. Below is a list of important NYPD phone numbers.

      Emergency: 911
      Non-Emergency: 311
      NYPD General Inquiries: 646-610-5000
      Sex Crimes Report Line: 212-267-7273
      Crime Stoppers: 800-577-TIPS
      Crime Stoppers (Spanish): 888-57-PISTA
      Missing Persons Case Status: 212-694-7781
      Terrorism Hot-Line: 888-NYC-SAFE
      Gun Stop Program: 866-GUN-STOP
      Cop Shot: 800-COP-SHOT

      1. Yo, moron, if you think it’s a crime to make fun of a smug leftist smiling about destroying a city, then you can call any of the numbers you already have.

    2. AI Overview

      In February 2019, Amazon canceled plans to build a major headquarters (HQ2) in Long Island City, Queens—adjacent to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s district—following intense backlash from local activists and politicians, including AOC. Opponents cited concerns over roughly
      billion in tax incentives, potential displacement, and rising living costs.

  5. Why is the free speech advocate always so up-in-arms by how people express themselves? How strange.

    1. I’ve been waiting all day for a comment as stupid as that. Thank you for obliging. I’m just (pleasantly) surprised it took this long.

      It’s the same reason freedom of religion advocates would be “up in arms” if someone else started burning down churches to prevent others from worshipping, as an act in obedience to his own religion. Is that too complicated a concept for you? Apparently.

  6. Ironically, censorship, such as preventing political opponents from speaking at all, is one of the aspects of fascism, or any totalitarian system.

    If they had confidence in their position, they would not fear opposing viewpoints.

      1. Excellent question. Ask Mark Farner, the original lead vocalist and guitarist for Grand Funk Railroad, who became a born-again Christian in the 1980s and subsequently developed a career as a contemporary Christian musician

Leave a Reply