
In one of the truly moronic acts from a government official, the Department of Education posted a mangled quote of Chinese Communist Party leader Mao Zedong on its website as the saying of the day for children. It is clear that whoever approved it had no idea who Mao was or the atrocities that he committed, particularly during the Cultural Revolution when intellectuals were massacred. The quote was taken down after various sites pointed out the irony. It was replaced by a quote from Lincoln.
The quote appeared on the “Kids’ Zone” website of the National Center for Education Statistics. The quote stated “Our attitude towards ourselves should be ‘to be satiable in learning’ and towards others ‘to be tireless in teaching.'” That was the webpage’s “Quote of the Day” section.
I understand that this is just one small site, though one would expect a modicum of care in a site for children. It is highly unnerving that a DOE employee clearly had no idea who Mao was. I consider the quote to be akin to a Hitler quote on the need for living space to achieve true happiness. Mao destroyed the intellectual and academic community in China in the cultural revolution and spoke of reeducation to mouth the Communist dogma of the time. It is not reeducation that is needed at the Education Department but simple education on history.
Source: Slate

It looks like the quote has been mistyped or improperly spell-checked by a careless copy writer. Here’s a discussion about the origin of the quote: http://thepondsofhappenstance.blogspot.com/2013/03/mao-quotes-another-indictment-of-us.html
Mao could have done more damage to China if he had a DOE with SWAT teams:
(Educational SWAT Team). Or perhaps if he could have spied on the Chinese people a bit better:
(Washington Post). Oh well, since China is taking over first place in the world, economically, what Mao said won’t do us any good anyway.
@BarkhDog: FreedomWorks?
So DOE CAN remove a Mao quote from a website as inappropriate but CAN’T get rid of Creationism from schools. Sad, just plain sad.
I personally don’t get why DOE would quote someone who’s purpose in life was to make his citizens drones (yeah, I know *sorry*) for the state. Then, one millisecond later, I go “of course they would!” What? They thought Socrates or Maria Montessori had nothing valuable to say?
How come the photo of Mao is without the hat?
Warren Zevon wrote it.
And, how come they spull Mao’s last name “Zedong”?
[Music}
We dont need no education!
We dont need no thought control..
All in all,, its just a…
Blip in the road…
…
Ok class. Who sang that song? What group?
Was it Mothers of Invention?
One may never truly know where they are from….but they mostly surly can tell you where they’ve been…. me….
Next you know thy will quote a little Hitler… A little Stalin….. Even Nero did some good…. That is why education is important….and not revisionist…..
Frankly, you absolutely have it correct…..
Our Amtrak trains take 30 hours to cover the distance the Chinese trains travel in 8 hours.
Gary T 1, March 24, 2013 at 9:37 am
To Arthur Randolph Erb:
And I am sure he got the trains to run on time too.
==============================================
According to the schedule of reality, China will overtake the U.S. economy at the world’s number one spot before 2016.
They actually have public transportation in the form of high speed trains, the fastest in the world:
(NY Times). Sounds like Mao did less damage to China than Oil-Qaeda has done to the U.S.eh?
To Arthur Randolph Erb:
And I am sure he got the trains to run on time too.
JT said:
“It is clear that whoever approved it had no idea who Mao was or the atrocities that he committed, particularly during the Cultural Revolution when intellectuals were massacred.”
It is equally clear that their true colors shine through, without the self-censorship they would have applied had they known who they were quoting.
Their quoting of Mao shows that they think like Mao, all on their own, did not think it was wrong thinking, and it is the same principles and sensibilities they apply in administering what is essentially a government communist program.
A rare poetically accidental peering into the minds of those who lord over us.
“Our attitude towards ourselves should be ‘to be satiable in learning’ and towards others ‘to be tireless in teaching.”
*****
Crikey! Satiable in learning? I wonder if the person who approved the quote knows what it means.
“Climate change is the greatest hoax ever fostered on the American people.” – Senator Inhofe
A fellow in the House who chairs a committee on the environment puts it:
(Climate Change Denying Congressman to Head Subcommittee on Climate Change). Thus the question arises, just because someone has blind spots in their cognition, does that mean they should be demonized?
Should all statements and books about Mao, Hitler, Cheney, and Bush II be forbidden?
I think Frankly has it down.
The good, the bad, and the ugly of leaders should be known so that others can attempt to emulate the good, and overcome the bad in their own lives.
Banning books or parts thereof is misguided.
It shows a certain intolerance to object to a quote from someone, just because you object to what that someone did.
It is just like politicians maligning their opponents because they don’t have a valid objection to their opponents policies.
That said, does ‘to be satiable in learning’ mean that you should find learning a satisfactory thing to do, or that you should be able to get to a stage where you are satisfied that you have learnt enough.
Given the nature of Maoism, I am sure that is an accurate quote and I think the person who selected it had no idea of the meaning of the word satiable and mistook it for insatiable. So that person has limited knowledge of history and the English language. Just the kind of person we need in education, and such folks will love that quote since it will guarantee their continuing in a cush job with no real ability to do it. A pure bureaucratic justification for everything.
As for Mao and his legacy, while he was bad enough, I have to remind folks that his opponents were NO better or more libertarian than Mao. At least he unified the country, got if fed better than it had been under Chiang and it became a world power. The Communists proved to be better organized and won the hears and minds of the Chinese people. The KMT folks simply had the force of arms to impose themselves on Formosa and cared little for freedom or democracy too.
Sloppy and stupid is a bad combination..
@Frankly: I had the same thought–I wonder if the original quote was “insatiable.” Either way, the person who posted it was ignorant of history and either sloppy or a very shallow thinker.
You know what they say: those who do not learn history are condemned to make idiots of themselves in public.
I am not the least bit troubled by their use of a Mao quote – even a blind sow can find an acorn.
I am, however, shocked at the quote! I can never have enough learning. I try to learn something new every day and love to dig into new information when I find it. I can’t imagine telling kids that they should ever believe they have learned enough!