MSNBC has been criticized for becoming as an extension of the Obama White House in the way that Fox News was criticized as being an extension of the Bush White House. Recently, however, many have been alarmed by the degree of blind loyalty shown the president with hosts siding with the White House against press rights and attacking figures like Snowden. This open letter to Snowden by Melissa Harris-Perry however surprises as the host assures him that the Obama Administration will guarantee his rights if only he will return. This follows such scenes as a MSNBC commentator defending the Administration’s attack on press freedom but calling Holder the “Moses of Our Time.”
The letter seems almost mocking in tone for Snowden who will almost certainly face life imprisonment if he returns given the different treatment afforded people in America’s New Animal Farm system. The United States is no longer viewed by many around the world and within the country as a guarantor of civil liberties. Conversely, one can disagree with the actions taken by Snowden but he is viewed as a whistleblower and a hero by many around the world. What is striking is that we now have networks that seem to be deliver the official line and media spin for the government –something that was once ridiculed in other countries. Yet, Harris-Perry says that she wants him to come home so she and others “can talk about something else” and assures him that the Obama Administration will treat him special due to the fact that you “made a spectacle of yourself.” Indeed, the only concern that she can think of is that our prisons are abusive, not anything to do with Obama or his policies.
Of course, the host does not mention that Obama still claims the right to pick and choose who gets a real trial and who goes to a military tribunal for a kangaroo court trial. She does not mention that Obama claims the right to kill any citizen that he decides is a threat to the United States. She also does not mention the Administration’s abusive use of classification authority to bar the use of evidence in cases and sweeping claims of nationals security privileges. Then there is the scorched earth campaign by Obama against whistleblowers. Then there are all of the powerful politicians irate over the embarrassment caused by Snowden in revealing their own complicity in the warrantless surveillance program and calling Snowden a “traitor” and spy. Yet, she simply cannot understand why Snowden does not trust Obama. After all, this is the Obama Administration . . . and this is now MSNBC.
SWM, Excusing her for saying something stupid because she was upset by the Zimmerman case. I consider that enabling, but I’m admittedly pretty tough in that regard. I’ve seen so much enabling in my life, including in my family, that I have zero tolerance. It wasn’t enabling her being drunk, drugged, etc., but it was a “bit” enabling; w/ “bit” being key.
CNN right now is trying to incite a riot and what is being done? The jury made their decision.
Since when are most trials fair? Prosecutors are on a political ladder at tax payers expense.
Richard Faust 1, July 15, 2013 at 9:05 am
Dredd and Elaine M., Here’s a list for those who are unable to focus: Melissa Harris-Perry (MSNBC), Joy Reid (MSNBC), Susan Rice (USA), Samantha Power (USA), Winnie Mandela (South Africa), Idi Amin (Uganda), Jean Bokassa (Central African Republic), Mobutu Sese-Seko (Zaire/Congo), Mengistu Haile Mariam (Ethiopia), Charles Taylor (Liberia), Jose Eduardo dos Santos (Angola), Robert Mugabe (Zimbabwe), Paul Kagame (Rwanda), Sani Abacha (Nigeria), Valentine Strasser (Senegal), Paul Biya (Cameroon),and the big kahuna himself: Barack Hussein Obama (USA, Indonesia, USA). Everyone of them are authoritarians. Just sayin’. Over and out.
=============================
Feisty, you left out somebody from South Am:
one word response – fail
I am surprised, but I guess I shouldn’t be, that she would say this. What Mike S said sometime up about the media and the $$.
I do think that Greenwald saying that Snowden will release really damaging information if he is pursued (think that was the wording) smacks to me of blackmail. I am not sure if he is traitor, hero, or somewhere in between but blackmail places him more in the former category of traitor. This is purely self interest, and potential harm to the country, which was allegedly not his initial intent.
President Obama reminds me of Ronald Reagan, only without the excuse of dementia.
Why should Edward Snowden return to the United States for a trial when he has done nothing wrong? He blew the whistle on massive government spying on American citizens and foreign citizens alike, which any American citizen worthy of the name would consider a duty, not a choice. Melissa Harris-Perry needs to revisit presidential candidate Barack Obama’s stirring words in praise of whistle-blowers and his promises to provide the “most transparent administration ever” — and then contrast those empty rhetorical exercises with the vicious and vindictive persecution of whistle-blowers that President Obama has actually conducted out of all proportion to reality and justice while indulging his own administration’s Niagra of self-serving leaks whenever politically opportune.
Edward Snowden deserves the Presidential Medal of Freedom; and if President Obama really wants Edward Snowden to return to his country, then President Obama should drop the phony “charges” against him, reinstate Snowden’s passport, and welcome him home to an awards presentation, not another kangaroo-court political show trial like the one so many other whistle-blowers have had to endure at Obama’s power-grasping hands.
Almost all the media is following the distractions, and not the real crimes.
“MSNBC has been criticized for becoming as an extension of the Obama White House in the way that Fox News was criticized as being an extension of the Bush White House. Recently, however, many have been alarmed by the degree of blind loyalty shown the president with hosts siding with the White House against press rights and attacking figures like Snowden”
Dare I agree with JT? opps, he said “many”. Well, I’m one of the many.
btw, I’m still here b/c I wanted it to be my decision to stop getting email announcements, but apparently that choice was taken from me. So I’ll stay for awhile.
nick. Enabling?
Nick…. It made no sense to me… So I just ignored it…..
SWM, That sounds just a bit enabling.
Bruce,
The problem is ubiquitous. It’s not just MSNBC. It’s about corporate media …and what Mike Spindell said. We have the media elite who are way too friendly/kind to the political elite.
All you have to know is she is on MSNBC
Smart is often trumped by self interest. MH Perry is very, very smart, but her self-interests in being a member of the Beltway establishment tops that. A TV news gig quadruples the pay that a professor gets and the money becomes intoxicating to the point that on some issues it blunts the viewpoint.
I was packing up some stuff and had MSNBC on in the backround Saturday morning. When I heard Melissa Harris Perry say this I was taken a back but at the same time she was visibly upset about Trayvon Martin and the impending verdict.
lottakatz 1, July 15, 2013 at 10:04 am
Is it possible for a civilian American citizen to be tried by a military tribunal for espionage?
*****
I think that almost anything is possible these days.
Otteray,
I’d call this one of Perry’s WTF moments. Evidently, she didn’t bring her car to work that day. I think she may have injured her head when she fell off the trolley.
RTC, LOL!