Postal Enemy #1: Darrell Issa and His Quest to Privatize the USPS…with Help from Congressional Colleagues

USPostalServiceLogoSubmitted by Elaine Magliaro, Weekend Contributor

Back in May 2012, I wrote a post titled Going Postal in Washington, D. C.: The USPS, the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006, Union Busting, and Paving the Road to Privatization. In it, I noted the main reason why the USPS is experiencing financial problems—a mandate included in the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 that required the USPS to pre-fund employee healthcare benefits for seventy-five years…in just tenDarrell_Issa years time. That legislation was passed “on a voice vote by a lame duck Republican Congress.” As Josh Eidelson wrote in a March 2012 Salon article titled Congress’s war on the post office, the Postal Service’s greatest threat isn’t email or economics. He put the blame where it rightly belongs—on Congress. So did Jeanette P. Dwyer, president of the Rural Letter Carriers Association. Dwyer was quoted by the New York Times last November as saying, “Congress created the problems, and it can fix them by taking away the requirement that no other government agency or business has to face.”

This legislative requirement that the USPS must prefund healthcare benefits for three-quarters of a century in one decade means that it has had to cough up $5.5 billion annually since 2007—and will have to continue to do so through 2016. Congress has not required any other government entity or agency to do the same. Why has the Postal Service—an institution that provides valuable services to businesses and to millions and millions of Americans—been singled out? Why indeed…when one considers that the USPS does not receive any tax dollars? It relies on the sale of postage and other products and services to fund its operations.

Both Alison Kilkenny and Matt Taibbi think that the purpose of the legislation “was to break a public sector union and privatize the mail industry.”


…the Postal Service has been under constant, vicious assault for years from the right, who views this as an epic battle with the goal of finally taking down the strongest union in the country, the second largest employer in the United States (second only to Wal-Mart,) and a means to roll the country ever closer toward the abyss of privatization.


The transparent purpose of this law, which was pushed heavily by industry lobbyists, was to break a public sector union and privatize the mail industry. Before the 2006 act, the postal service did one thing, did it well, and, minus the need to generate profits and bonuses for executives, did it cheaply. It paid for itself and was not a burden to taxpayers.

Ah, privatization! We’ve gone down that road before with the privatization of prisons in this country…the privatization of parking meters in the city of Chicago…the privatization of many of our military services. We now have groups that are attempting to privatize public schools. Why not the postal service too?

We continue to hear how privatization will save money and benefit tax payers. But will it? David Cay Johnston says it won’t. He claims that the government is “paying through the nose” for the services of private contractors.

David Cay Johnston (Newsweek, December 2013):

The budget debate now consuming Washington often seems to come down to guns versus butter, or at least its contemporary manifestation, Reaper Drones versus food stamps.

What gets lost in the increasingly caustic rhetoric is just how inefficient the U.S. government is when it spends, especially when it is outsourcing tasks to hugely profitable private companies.

Fortunately, the budget deal just worked out between the White House and Capitol Hill will prevent a government shutdown and all of its attendant global financial inconveniences. But it does nothing to curtail wasteful spending on companies that are among the nation’s richest and most powerful – from Booz Allen Hamilton, the $6 billion-a-year management-consulting firm, to Boeing, the defense contractor boasting $82 billion in worldwide sales.

In theory, these contractors are supposed to save taxpayer money, as efficient, bottom-line-oriented corporate behemoths. In reality, they end up costing twice as much as civil servants, according to research by Professor Paul C. Light of New York University and others has shown. Defense contractors like Boeing and Northrop Grumman cost almost three times as much.

Essentially, the federal government operates two contracting systems, separate and unequal. One hires profit-making corporations, the other handles nonprofits.

Washington lavishes taxpayers’ money on for-profits. Many smaller contracting firms making good money for doing relatively little work ring the nation’s capital and are commonly known as Beltway Bandits. Remarkably, some of these enterprises set themselves up with a Bermuda mailbox to escape paying the federal taxes – perhaps most notably Accenture, which runs the IRS website. (Accenture maintains that its structure was not designed to avoid taxes.)

Johnston added:

But shoddy work doesn’t mean you will get fired from a government contract. Nor can that lackluster effort, like the disaster that is the Obamacare signup website, be blamed on inadequate pay to hire talent to set up a reliable website. Last year, contractors were allowed to charge the government as much as $763,029 per worker.

In the Public Interest addressed some of the “myths” about privatization:

Proponents of privatization promise to fix budget woes by saving the government money.  But numerous examples in a variety of sectors show that projected savings don’t always materialize.   Cost overruns combined with hidden and indirect costs, such as contract monitoring and administration, can make privatization more expensive than in-house services for governments.   In fact, the Government Finance Officers Association estimates that hidden and indirect costs can add up to 25% to the contract price.

In the Public Interest also weighed in on risks involved with privatization:

Privatization and contracting out involve giving up control of public structures we all rely on to private companies.  Once a public service or asset is privatized, we, the public, lose the ability to have a voice in decisions affecting that service or asset.  We also lose the ability to request and view important information related to the privatized function.  Without proper information and a forum in which to voice opinions, the public is effectively shut out of the decision-making process.  These services and structures are no longer controlled by a government accountable to the public, but instead beholden to companies who may have entirely different goals and priorities.

Josh Eidelson (Salon) reported on Friday that the Postal Service’s largest union was “raising alarm over a pilot partnership with Staples, which it warns is a stalking horse for privatization – a goal the union alleges draws support or indifference from key Democrats.”

American Postal Workers Union (APWU) president Mark Dimondstein spoke to Salon last week “prior to Tuesday demonstrations outside Staples stores in San Francisco and San Jose, the first of what he said would be an escalating wave of protests.” He said he thought that Congress and the White House were “pretty much working hand in hand.” He added, “There hasn’t been a fight to defend the public good, and there hasn’t been a real fight around good jobs.”


California is one of four regions in which the new Staples pilot program is underway, and the first target for postal union pushback. While Congress and President Obama have not played a public role in instigating the pilot program, APWU is seeking support from both in stemming the perceived privatization threat. Both of the state’s U.S. senators, Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, are Democrats who voted for a 2012 tripartisan postal bill from Sens. Carper, D-Del., Lieberman, I-Conn., and Brown, R-Mass.; neither is listed among the 30 co-sponsors of a union-favored alternative introduced last year by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. Dimondstein charged that the California senators “have not been fighters to defend, or advocates to defend, the people’s post office as I think our elected officials should be.” A spokesperson for Boxer did not respond to a request for comment.

Dimondstein was particularly critical of Feinstein, noting that her husband, Richard Blum, chairs the board of the real estate giant CBRE, which holds an exclusive contract to negotiate the sale of Postal Service buildings to private companies. Blum is the co-founder and CEO of Blum Capital Partners, which led a $750 million buyout of CBRE in 2001.

“I can’t get into her mind,” the union president told Salon, “but I would think that the fact that her husband is making so much money off the sale of post offices has to have an influence in the way that she approaches these issues.”

The postal union had “harsh words” for Rep. Darrell Issa (R-California) who is the chairman of the House’s Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Issa is the member of Congress who has been most aggressive in leading the charge to reform the USPS. He has called for the discontinuation of Saturday postal deliveries—among other things. John Nichols (The Nation) said last July that Issa had a plan to put the Postal Service in a “death spiral.” He added that Issa has had a “long history of attacking the postal service.”


The changes Issa proposes would, according to the National Association of Letter Carriers, lead to “the elimination of more than 100,000 postal jobs and would dramatically cut service.” And in addition to its assault on the character and quality of postal service, the legislation includes classic austerity schemes, such as a prohibition against postal unions and management from negotiating protections against the closure of post offices, stations and branches, the consolidating of plants, the privatization of operations and layoffs.

The cuts, if implemented, would issue as an open invitation for private-delivery services to cash in by offering to fill the void created by those cuts. There are profits to be made by delivering mail to the front doors of Americans who can pay—and who want regular delivery on Saturdays. So it should come as no surprise that one of the first endorsements for Issa’s proposal came from the “Coalition for a 21st Century Postal Service,” a group that counts FedEx as one of its most enthusiastic boosters.

The corporations that want to carve the USPS up and grab their pieces of America’s communications infrastructure are ready to pounce.

Would we be better served by privatized mail delivery service? I think not. Remember the failure of FedEx and UPS to deliver an untold number of Christmas packages on time?

Last December, Charles Pierce (Esquire) alluded to that failure of private companies when he wrote: “My goodness, it’s been a terrible holiday season for those people who trumpet the flexibility and abiding genius of the Free Market over the clammy deadweight of Government.” He continued, “Then, just as we’re all waiting on our porches for the last of our Christmas packages to arrive, we recall that the people who have worked for two decades to chloroform the U. S. Postal Service always have assured us that the Private Sector, as personified by FedEx and UPS, would more than make up the slack when the clearly obsolete USPS goes out of business.

UPS said, “The volume of air packages in our system exceeded the capacity of our network”—and apologized to its customers. FedEx also apologized to its customers—and called the volume an “extraordinary event.” Both companies blamed the problem on “weeks of bad weather and higher demand from soaring online sales.”

Making light of their excuses, Charles Pierce wrote:

This was due to inexplicable “bad weather” in a season we like to call “winter” and due to an “extraordinary event.”

Called “Christmas.”

UPS, FedEx scrambling to deliver late Christmas packages

John Nichols wrote that the USPS “continues to perform with more agility than private firms, as holiday delivery patterns illustrated—in ways that are all but certain to make the postal service vulnerable to privatization.” Nichols said that ending Saturday mail service would negatively affect “the ability of the postal service to meet the demands of modern shipping and communications.” He added that “the likely result would be a rapid shift of traffic to private firms, which contribute heavily to politicians but which do not provide the universal, low-cost service that is the hallmark of the postal service.”

Nichols added that privatizing the postal service could “harm the employment prospects of veterans” as the USPS is second only to the US Department of Defense in the number of veterans it employs. He said that more than 20 percent of the USPS workforce—approximately 120,000 employees—have records of military service. He noted that close to “a third of those employees are rated as 30 percent or more disabled, a reflection of the fact that the postal service goes out of its way to provide an array of employment services and options for veterans.”

GOP Political Target: Republican Congressman Darrell Issa’s Anti-Post Office Crusade

Submitted by Elaine Magliaro

The views expressed in this posting are the author’s alone and not those of the blog, the host, or other weekend bloggers. As an open forum, weekend bloggers post independently without pre-approval or review. Content and any displays or art are solely their decision and responsibility.


“Cynical and diabolical”: Issa attracts allies in quest to demolish Postal service: Union president tells Salon the lawmaker is “a pure enemy of the Postal Service” — and he has bipartisan partners (Salon)

Issa bill would end Saturday mail to repeal military pension cut (Washington Post)

Darrell Issa’s Cruelest Cut: A Seriously Cynical Attack on the Postal Service (The Nation)

Darrell Issa’s Got a Plan to Put the Postal Service in a Death Spiral (The Nation)

Oversight Committee Approves Issa’s New Postal Reform Bill (National Journal)

Don’t Let Business Lobbyists Kill the Post Office (Rolling Stone)

The Invisible Hand Is All Thumbs (Esquire)

Darrell Issa’s Mischievous Postal Reform Bill (Business Week)

Congress’s war on the post office: The Postal Service faces a threat greater than email or economics: Politics (Salon)

Amid Capitol Turmoil, Postal Crisis Drags On (New York Times)

Privatization Myths Debunked (In the Public Interest)

Privatization 101 (In the Public Interest)

US Postal Union Peeved at Staples for Threatening Jobs (ABC News)

The U.S. Government Is Paying Through the Nose For Private Contractors (Newsweek)

UPS, FedEx scramble to deliver delayed Christmas packages (NBC News)

Postal Workers: The Last Union (Truth-Out)

26 thoughts on “Postal Enemy #1: Darrell Issa and His Quest to Privatize the USPS…with Help from Congressional Colleagues”

  1. What Darren said. The USPS would make money if the right would allow it too. The pension requirement is what put in trouble and the pension requirement is one of the most obvious attempts to destroy an agency that is not duplicated by any delivery service out there. There are many rural areas that are not serviced by UPS or FED-EX and would be left in the cold without the USPS.

  2. There may be arguments for privatizing the USPS. Based on similar experiments in Germany, Austria, Belgium, and now in Great Britain, private investment has helped make these institutions in these countries, profitable. With email, Fedex, UPS, etc., the necessity and responsibility of a government institution ensuring our mail and stuff getting delivered, may be moot. The transition to email is ongoing and will be complete someday. If someone needs to send a letter, then it will surely be for reasons other than speed and personal contact. Email surpasses this.

    Regarding the privatization of prisons, however, this is just not correct. The penal system is part of the justice system which is part of our government and our responsibility to our selves. Making incarceration a private sector money making affair only invites more corruption into a justice system that is not without its share of corruption already. After all the corruption that exists in our justice system is directly related to the fallibility of the human being(s) in place. Compounding this with the unlimited potential for corruption found in the private sector is simply ludicrous. Incarceration is not a money making scheme. A postal service should be.

  3. Off topic–but on the subject of privatization:

    Nebraska Lawmaker Wants Her State To Stop Paying Private Prisons For Empty Cells
    By Alan Pyke
    February 1, 2014

    Promising to keep private prison cells full will be illegal in Nebraska if a proposal from state Sen. Amanda McGill (D) becomes law.

    McGill, who is running for higher state office this year, has introduced legislation banning the government from guaranteeing payment to private contractors regardless of the level of service the contractor provide. While that may sound so obvious as to be unnecessary, states often make those kinds of promises to corporations when they privatize public services.

    The most notorious examples are private prison contracts that guarantee companies like the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) a certain minimum occupancy level at prisons, and promise to pay CCA the difference should prison populations sag below that level. Such “lock-up quotas” appear in two-thirds of all prison privatization contracts, according to a report last fall by the anti-privatization group In The Public Interest (ITPI).

    McGill’s legislation would ban those kinds of payment guarantees across all state contracts, but is specifically targeted at prison contracts. The bill also would amend the state’s corrections contracting law in a variety of ways to both protect taxpayers and regulate prison companies more tightly.

  4. You might care to watch how badly the privatisation of the Royal Mail in the UK is turning out.

  5. Simply put, the United States Postal Service is a national resource that should be protected at all costs. Anyone claiming otherwise, or working to undermine it to the benefit of private enterprise, does not have the public interest in mind.

  6. For disclosure, I was raised in a Postal Service Family. My dad worked for the USPS for 37 years as a postal clerk and is retired.

    Any of these congressmen who think that ridding America of the Postal Service is beneficial is in for an education. First, the startup cost to create the infrastructure to mimic First Class Mail is in the hundreds of billions and would take probably a decade to install if it can be done reliably. And, it is an impossibility for them to maintain the same or lower postage rates as is currently assessed.

    There are a litany of other services only the USPS provides and has the statutory authority to protect. No private package carriers have a postal inspection service or Office of the Inspector General (mostly used for internal quality control and security) Not only that but forget registered mail, certified mail and COD ability especially for the prices offered. Plus, there is public oversight on prices and services. Private Enterprise lacks this if the company is privately held. Breaches in private enterprises’ security would be generally a breach of contract. Breaches in USPS regulations can be a violation of federal law. The USPS mail is protected to a significantly greater degree.

    From just scale of economy the postal service is a better deal. Are we going to expect that for less than fifty cents, UPS is going to deliver a letter from Portland Maine to Guam? The post office does. Plus First Class mail has a legalized monopoly and other carriers cannot duplicate this.

    I have said this before if congress made the USPS go away one day there would be an economic meltdown in a week. These congress folks have no clue what they are trying to do.

    As for the gripes about the postal workers’ unions they are not a greedy union out to fleece all the money they can and make postal rates go beyond affordability. Full time postal workers are paid a family wage, Not high, not low, but enough to support a family reasonably. Benefits are good also. But there is no one employed by the USPS in any capacity that makes a boatload of money like many CEOs and such in private industry. USPS does not pay only minimum wage, many large companies do. And after paying decent wages, benefits, and all capital outlays you the customer get to mail a 2 ounce 9×11 envelope to your friend in NYC for $1.19. Sure there have been some problems, but name one company this large or has this many employees who hasn’t. Moreover, USPS union employees a liability? Well they are statutorily prohibited from striking.

    Hopefully Congress will finally recognize how ridiculous they are being and lay off the USPS. Hopefully the USPS will get through these punishments levied by our own government and maybe 2016 will be the light at the end of the tunnel. But I always wonder with this government, what will be next from them.

  7. It is my understanding through research that the Post Office is to be established in every community by a Post Master. How many people are aware that you can send mail between Post Masters for a two cent stamp (general delivery)? Now getting the mail delivered to your house is another story and I think that should be Privatized.

  8. excellent piece.

    Corporate representatives in congress like issa, in their quests to privatize anything and everything that belongs to the public in order to redistribute upward into the corporate welfare trough, like to call their schemes reform to dupe the public.
    It’s always bothered me that the MSM parrots the word “reform” without question (without quotes). Education reform has been repeated unquestioningly in the press over and over, even by those who see it for what it is. These “reform” schemes should be more properly called malform or deform or just cons, heists or schemes. Or at the very least put in quotes. We shouldn’t cater to these criminals in our congress and their cronies.


    read the above link and find out the truth about human resource and why you must contact them to apply for or complain about a job..

    the u.s.a is no longer pretending to be a government for the people its showing its true colors as a corporation and if the people really want to put a end to this.. you will have to begin by breaking them. and that means boycotting their services.. but you wont!!! you will continue to shop at wal mart. continue to pay bills for cable, buy expensive crap you cant afford, or which is only used to continue your enslavement. because you do not want to admit to the truth.. NO MATTER HOW DEEPLY its put in your face….

  10. Except what those who want to “eliminate” the U.S. Post Office “seem” to forget is that pesky thing of am ending the Constitution. I wonder if any of the “geniuses” on Capitol Hill really read that document.

  11. Most of the 1% crowd is too dependent on Government assistance and need
    to become independent rather than always looking for a handout from
    Uncle Sugar/

  12. Issa want to privatize the Postal Service to make sure his wealth friends can make a bundle and to destroy the postal union. Issa is a smarmy, nasty plutocrat who believes the rest of us just don’t matter. The amazing thing is people continue to vote for him. Voters seem to be oblivious to their own self interest or the Interests of the good of the country.

  13. Great job Elaine! Issa is dirty and his comrades are intent on killing the post office in order to kill the union and to pad his benefactors pockets in the ultimate privatization scheme.

  14. Jomo his brother did the time….. Not bad for a car thief as you said….. It’s part of the club to be into criminal enterprise…..too bad Rico does not apply to congress…..

    Excellent piece Elaine….. And privatization does not work in the long run…. Cost effectively….

  15. Darrell Issa a miserable little car thief who managed to escape conviction for his misconduct

  16. No surprise congress which relies on the largess of corporations and industry(ies) would work, on both sides of the aisle to shore up private business/shut down what has worked.

Comments are closed.