We have previously discussed how many Democrats and liberals have stayed relatively silent as the Obama Administration has launched attacks on privacy, press freedoms, and civil liberties. In addition President Obama has engaged in military interventions, declared the right to kill citizens on his own authority, refused to investigate the U.S. torture program, and repeatedly violated the separation of powers. Now, we can add the violation of attorney-client privilege and confidentiality. Once again, the disclosure came as a result not of congressional oversight or Executive reforms, but the Snowden disclosures.
The document discussed by the New York Times shows that the National Security Agency (NSA) intercepted attorney-client communications of an American law firm that was representing a foreign government in trade disputes with the United States.
The government of Indonesia had retained the lawyers in trade talks and the N.S.A.’s Australian counterpart, the Australian Signals Directorate, notified the NSA that it was conducting surveillance of the talks. It expressly noted intercepts of attorney-clients communications with the law firm of Mayer Brown. The communication flagged that the “information covered by attorney-client privilege may be included” in the intelligence gathering, according to the New York Times.
Notably, the general counsel’s office at NSA was consulted. [For full disclosure, I worked as an intern with that office during the Reagan Administration] The NSA general counsel is the very same office that was consulted and approved past abuses during the Bush Administration.
As with privacy, separation of powers, and other protections, it is unlikely that there will be any serious repercussions for security officials or even a change in conduct. It becomes just another cost to place on a lengthening ledger of lost items under this President. It is a rather pathetic sight as such rights fall with little more than a whisper of regret in a triumph of personality over principle in the Obama Administration.
The law firm itself issued a mild comment that seemed more intent on defending the firm’s role and continued security for clients as opposed to objecting to the possible denial of confidentiality or the role of the NSA in such surveillance.
Source: NY Times
48 thoughts on “Report: NSA Spied On Lawyers In Confidential Communications With Clients”
FREEDOM OF THE PRESS HAS PREVAILED.
President Barack Obama’s attempt to infiltrate and censor American’s newsrooms has failed. The people stood up and spoke out against it and squashed it. The people are the sovereign. That’s all it takes. It’ not complicated.
A mad Russian isn’t something that pretty either. LOL We’ll have to wait and see what happens.
It’s an international disaster if anyone gets involved…. That area had been very loyal to the Russians…. The ones on the west want to go….. You think the jihad is bad…. A mad Ukrainian is not something you want…..
Hi Anonymously Yours: I’m sure you will get your wish.
Now why would we want to creat an international crisis with getting involved with the Ukrainians…… I hope Obama is smart enough to sit this one out…..
Barack Obama is impotent to deal with the crisis in Ukraine. He has lost all credibility. His words ring hollow.
For those who voted for Obama, they got exactly what they deserve. For those of us who didn’t vote for Obama, we got what we didn’t deserve. And for those who voted for Obama twice, they begged to be punished.
Comments are closed.