By Darren Smith, Weekend Contributor
James Goad, of Meeker, Oklahoma, says the harassment that followed his action amounted to a violation of his First Amendment right to freedom of speech. In the suit against the Meeker Police Department and Police Chief Sam Byrd, Goad claims police arrested him and violated his civil rights to get back at him for his sign stunt.
“Mr. Goad was exercising his constitutional right to free speech when he posted the speed trap warning sign on the property,” Goad’s attorney, Jack Dawson, wrote.
Byrd said he couldn’t comment on Goad’s specific charges because he had not been served with the lawsuit. But he said the sign Goad posted in June, 2012, in front of Meeker Supply & Pawn, which read “Slow down, Meeker speed trap ahead,” didn’t bother him. But it seems the situation was much more involved and Goad’s accusations show a rather disturbing action by a member of the department.
Chief Byrd stated to FoxNews.com “To be honest, nobody cared,” “It’s freedom of speech – you can post whatever you want out there.”
But the sign apparently bothered former Meeker reserve Officer Sean Sugrue, according to Dawson. Sugrue allegedly began staking out speeders with a radar gun on Red Hill Road, right in front of the pawn shop, blocking customers from coming in. Goad claims when he told Officer Sugrue to leave, he refused and then followed him when he went to town hall to complain to the mayor. Once there, Officer Sugrue accused him of not wearing a seatbelt and of running a stop sign, claims Goad denied. After the incident, Goad filed a formal complaint, and an internal investigation backed him up. Officer Sugrue, who no longer works for the police department, issued an apology, but the wording did little to assuage Goad.
“I apologize if my actions appeared unprofessional and showed the town in a bad light,” Sugrue wrote. “Mr. Goad needs to know that he does not own the police department and that attempting to get belligerent with a police officer might have some negative effects.”
Chief Byrd said he thought the issue had been resolved after the departmental investigation. Although he said Officer Sugrue no longer works for him, he added that it was not a result of the feud with Goad. “In the issue with Mr. Goad, he came and filed a complaint with us,” Byrd said. “That was investigated and that was dealt with. We have our procedures for those kinds of complaints.”
But in February, 2013, Officer Sugrue pulled Goad over for speeding, and the feud was back on. Goad challenged the ticket in court, and on March 6, 2013, requested a copy of Sugrue’s personnel file. A day later, Officer Sugrue ran a background check on Goad with the FBI’s National Crime Information Center, and arrested Goad for the felony offense of “making a false declaration to law enforcement” in his old complaint against Sugrue.
The issue, Officer Sugrue said at the time, was that Goad had stated he owned the pawn shop, something he could not do as because Goad had a past felony conviction. A judge tossed both the speeding ticket and Officer Sugrue’s new charge.
It is rather hard to argue that the conduct by Officer Sugrue, if proven, does not constitute harassment. Many of the actions alleged show that Goad was singled out for police action, including going to the length of running a Triple-I (Interstate Identification Index) check looking for something to charge Goad with.
Recently a United States District Court Judge in Missouri ruled that the flashing of headlights to warn drivers of oncoming speed enforcement by law enforcement was protected under the first amendment. The text for which can be read HERE.
By Darren Smith
The views expressed in this posting are the author’s alone and not those of the blog, the host, or other weekend bloggers. As an open forum, weekend bloggers post independently without pre-approval or review. Content and any displays or art are solely their decision and responsibility.