By Mike Appleton, Weekend Contributor
“All governments are theocracies. We now live in a secular humanist theocracy. I want to change that to a government with God at its head.”
-Gary DeMar (quoted in John Sugg, “A Nation Under God,” Mother Jones (December, 2005)
When I started first grade in 1951, each school day began with the Pledge of Allegiance. We recited “one nation, indivisible,” because people understood that fidelity to one’s country is not a religious virtue. The National Prayer Breakfast was not on anyone’s calendar because it didn’t exist. Politicians felt no compulsion to invoke God’s blessings on the United States at the conclusion of every speech. Protestants opposed every effort to secure public funding of Catholic parochial schools in order to preserve the “wall of separation” between church and state. The corner grocer didn’t care whether a customer was gay or had been born again. Textbooks were not reviewed by religious committees for conformity with the King James Version. No serious person had yet suggested that insentient, artificial commercial entities could magically channel the religious beliefs of their shareholders. And no one complained that a war was being waged against religion.
But following some of the events at this year’s Values Voter Summit, I have become nostalgic for 1951.
The Summit is the premiere annual political event for conservative Christian evangelicals, and making an appearance has become almost a required pilgrimage for Republican presidential candidates who desire the support of the religious right base of the party. Those in attendance this year heard many of the usual rants against same-sex marriage, abortion and the contraception mandate in the Affordable Care Act. However, those concerns did not top the priority list. Instead, a 39% plurality of those polled at the conference believe that the most important issue facing the country today is religious liberty.
So how is this possible? The past 30 years have seen an explosion in government support of religion. Millions of dollars in public funds are provided to a variety of so-called “faith-based” programs. Taxpayers support charter schools with decidedly sectarian curricula all across the country. A number of states provide tax credits to enable parents to send their children to religious schools. Religious institutions and, after Hobby Lobby, for-profit businesses as well, have been granted exemptions from compliance with portions of the ACA. This is in addition to the exemptions from anti-discrimination legislation which religious institutions already enjoy in their hiring and firing practices. Religious groups distribute bibles in public schools and operate after-school programs on school property to proselytize grammar school children. The Town of Greece decision now permits governments to schedule ceremonial prayer in accordance with local majoritarian religious preferences. Most rational people would agree that freedom of religion and religious expression are hardly at risk.
The comments of several of the event speakers may furnish us a clue. Kelly Shackelford of the Liberty Institute repeated the false story of the child disciplined for saying grace before eating her lunch. Michele Bachmann reminded the audience that the battle against Islamic terrorism is “spiritual warfare.” Gary Bauer accused President Obama of protecting Muslims while ignoring the persecution of Christians in the Middle East. Jason and David Benham, whose proposed television program on HGTV was cancelled after revelations of their virulently anti-gay activities, compared themselves to victims of ISIS, silenced for their Christian beliefs. And Sen. Ted Cruz, who for the second year in a row won the presidential straw poll, intoned “We need a president who will speak out for people of faith, for prisoners of conscience.” So for the attendees at the Values Voter Summit, there is indeed a war on Christianity. It is being waged by Muslims and by those who object to intolerance.
But the whole story is really darker. When members of the Christian right speak of freedom of religion, what they mean is freedom for a particular brand of conservative Christianity. Tony Perkins is the president of the Family Research Council, the principal sponsor of the annual Summit. He is neither a legal scholar nor a theologian, but that does not matter. In Mr. Perkins’ view, religious freedom does not apply to Islam. It also does not apply to Christians who support gay rights. In fact, religious liberty is reserved solely for those holding “orthodox religious viewpoints. It has to have a track record, it has to come forth from religious orthodoxy.” Mr. Perkins’ First Amendment does not compel government neutrality toward religion; it requires preferential treatment for those Christian sects whose doctrines adhere to Mr, Perkins’ notion of orthodoxy. He is a theocratic dominionist in religious liberty’s clothing.
And that, in a nutshell, is what the war on religion in America is all about. It is a war declared by Christian fundamentalists on all religious traditions deemed non-conforming. The goal is a society in which separation of church and state is eliminated and religious pluralism rejected as unbiblical. Ted Cruz is merely the latest last hope for the hapless.
@Annie and swm
Thank you!
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Does pornography drive demand for sex trafficking?
Posted on September 29, 2014 by Sarah Pierce
http://humantraffickingsearch.net/wp/does-pornography-drive-demand-for-sex-trafficking/“
Squeeky, LOL!
@NickS
I have read Camille Paglia, and have 2 of her books. As far as being provincial, if you mean that I don’t wish to star in a bukkake flick, or have objects shoved up my rear end, then I am guilty as charged. Somehow, I suspect that you are equally provincial. But, I could be wrong.
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
anon: Since I work in the legal adult porn industry, I can assure you that NONE of the women who perform in the sexual content produced by adult industry producers are trafficked, and of course, no children appear in their movies. The adult industry opposes human trafficking of all sorts.
Squeeky needs to read some Camille Paglia.
I’m taking a wild guess here but I think Mark has some REAL nasty letters to him in his file cabinet. Like maybe THOUSANDS. They would make a great anthology book.
@Mark Kernes
And you want the movie Deep Throat to be celebrated??? Here is what Linda Lovelace has to say:
There are other interesting tidbits from other porn actresses at this link:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?98713-Porn-stars-speak-out-about-the-reality-of-the-porn-industry
For example:
But, by all means, you go celebrate the porn industry! Perhaps for an encore you can become a Concentration Camp Reporter, and regale the world with tales of all the hijinks behind barb wire.
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
nick, Historically some feminists and the religious right have allied over porn. Not a big issue for me but squeeky did make some valid points.
A little food for thought:
“The Connection Between Sex Trafficking and Pornography”
http://humantraffickingsearch.net/wp/the-connection-between-sex-trafficking-and-pornography/
America’s Dirty Little Secret: Sex Trafficking Is Big Business
By John W. Whitehead
September 29, 2014
“For every 10 women rescued, there are 50 to 100 more women are brought in by the traffickers. Unfortunately, they’re not 18- or 20-year-olds anymore. They’re minors as young as 13 who are being trafficked. They’re little girls.”—25-year-old victim of trafficking
“Children are being targeted and sold for sex in America every day.”—John Ryan, National Center for Missing & Exploited Children
https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/americas_dirty_little_secret_sex_trafficking_is_big_business
SWM, She is provincial sexually. But, you folks are aligned w/ Senator Jeff Sessions. During the sexual assaults in the military hearings he blamed porn. What folks like yourself, SWM, don’t understand is that we free thinkers can disagree on topics. We don’t have a little red book that tells us how to think on certain topics. Squeeky and I disagree on other topics. Free thinkers are bound to disagree, that’s why folks like us deplore echo chambers. But, when the Falwell’s and Sessions, align w/ the Steinem’s and SWM’s, something is TERRRRRRIBLY wrong.
Hahahahahaaah, SWM, I was thinking the exact same thing!
Fickle is thy name!
“Real women embrace porn. Provincial women are w/ the Jerry Falwell’s of the world on the topic. But hell, this is the US. Embrace whomever you like.” No, you have called squeeky a real woman many times. Now, she isn’t but because she has spoken out against violent porn.
LMAO, “Real” women embrace porn?! Whoa another excellent joke! Fake women, ala blowup dolls embrace sex too!
@Mark Kernes
I guess you are one of those people who can make themselves believe anything. A few excerpts from an ex-porn star::
http://www.covenanteyes.com/2008/10/28/ex-porn-star-tells-the-truth-about-the-porn-industry/
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Squeeky: Wow! You’ve hit the know-nothing porn-critic trifecta with your last two posts. You apparently expect me to take seriously a quote from John Stoltenberg who had the interesting experience (I’m sure) of being married to anti-porn “feminist” Andrea Dworkin, who famously said that all male/female sexual couplings are rape, plus you’ve managed to dig out another screed from former-prostitute-turned-porn-performer-turned-religious-grifter Shelley Lubben, whose lies about the adult industry have been well-refuted by documentarian Michael Whiteacre here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZmLv1w4RZg&hd=1), here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol0IKeWPIvQ&hd=1), here (www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_r7NZsTH8U&hd=1) and in several other similar episodes.
America’s still a (putatively) free country, so you’re certainly free to dislike porn as much as you like. I know I’d appreciate it, though, if you became actually informed on the subject rather than simply repeating second-hand the lies told by others.
Markkerns, the comment you posted at 4:03 had more than two hyperlinks and therefore the system kicked it out. I edited it by dereferencing one of the links.
You might not have been aware of this but a comment having greater than two comments is affected. If you would like to provide the readers with more than two links, just add those within an additional comment.
Thanks, Darren! I didn’t know that; I was wondering why it went up with the admonition “awaiting moderation,” and in future, will try to limit the links in any one post from now on to two.
Real women embrace porn. Provincial women are w/ the Jerry Falwell’s of the world on the topic. But hell, this is the US. Embrace whomever you like.
You posting some some good stuff on this thread, Squeeky.
@NickS
Well, I like what this guy said:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/06/a-short-history-of-male-feminism/372673/
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Sure they did…5-4 again. Does that surprise you? Early voting is, apparently, against the law.
I never said porn was Academy Award. It’s what men watch to get off for chrissake. It’s fantasy. It’s a guy thing. Don’t like it. Don’t watch it.