Farrakhan: United States Developed Ebola and Other Means To Kill Black People While Sparing White People

ebola250px-FarrakhanLouis Farrakhan has long been dismissed by most people as a race-baiting crank. However, Farrakhan’s latest missive to his Nation of Islam followers is particularly incendiary. He suggests that ebola and other diseases were developed by the United States to “depopulate” the world of black people. What is dangerous is that thousands actually believe Farrakhan’s conspiracy theories. Notably, this conspiracy is very close to the one being spread among remote villages of Africa where health care workers are being killed because they are viewed as spreading the disease or working for those who created it.

Of course, by spreading the Ebola conspiracy theory, Farrakhan makes it more likely that blacks will die from the disease, which was first diagnosed at a remote village near the Central African Republic border on the Ebola river in 1976.

In his message to followers, Farrakhan states:

What is the method that they are going to use to depopulate? Through civil wars in which depleted uranium and Agent Orange are used. . . . Another method is disease infection through bio-weapons such as Ebola and AIDS, which are race targeting weapons. There is a weapon that can be put in a room where there are Black and White people, and it will kill only the Black and spare the White, because it is a genotype weapon that is designed for your genes, for your race, for your kind.

After rattling off other aspects of the conspiracy from fast food to genetically altered crops (that sterilize people), Farrakhan adds:

What kind of mind could take you in a room and give you an inoculation that you think is one thing, but it is something else? See, nobody could do this but a devil. I’m not talking about some spook devil—I’m talking about a real devil that can breathe and has hands and a brain to think evil!

I don’t want anyone to think I’m a racist; if any of you that are here that think of yourselves as White, don’t look at me like I’m a hater, because everything I say, I can prove it and will die on it! I’m not against any race; I am against the evil that men of that race are planning against my people.

No, none of that is racist. The business of how white people are spreading disease to kill black people is completely sane and non-racial.

What is incredible is that suggestions that black people should resist inoculations as a vehicle for genocide by white people. That again is what is being spread in Africa where ebola victims are being “rescued” from clinics and villages have barred teams from entering to help stop the disease. Of course, we have had many of these brave doctors and health care doctors — including many white health care professionals — not only put themselves in harm’s way to help Africans but have died as a result.

161 thoughts on “Farrakhan: United States Developed Ebola and Other Means To Kill Black People While Sparing White People”

  1. Answer to Donald Trump because of his statement: Vaccines Causes Autism.

    Professor Johan van Dongen
    The Netherlands.


    Bio-warfare Laboratory of German and Japanese War Criminals Under Guidance of the USA.

    The Revealing Voices of Aids/HIV Theory Dissidents

    The horrific Aids pandemic tremendously has generated scientific controversies within and outside the scientific establishment. Only a minority of scientists, like Johan van Dongen, and other engaged people have access to inside information concerning (bio-warfare) Aids and Ebola research.

    As an experimental microsurgeon Johan van Dongen, in the early seventies, almost at the beginning of the multiple organ transplantation era, has carried out thousands of experimental organ transplantations. In order to deal with organ rejection he administered, radiation and sera for diminishing the immunity of the organ receiver. Besides that he also administered uncountable agents to recipients of organs in order to trigger, diminish or completely whipe out the immune capacity which can be compared with Aids.

    During his university and hospital appointments in the early seventies, and later undercover in the pharmaceutical industry, he discovered at that time that animals did’nt die because of rejection of the transplanted organ but because of multiple infections which can be compared with human Aids victims. So, Johan van Dongen noticed that Aids can be induced by radiation, aflatoxins, Immuran/prednisolone combination, anti lymfocyte sera and many other bio-warfare agents.

    Dormant HIV virus

    As head of the the Department of Experimental Microsurgery, and involved in all transplantation and immunological experiments, Johan also have been involved in many controversies. Especially the connection of his work and the polemic concerning the transmission of HIV in many ways he discovered not only in his experiments but also in the extensive scientific literature the role of an obligatory cofactor that transactivates the “Dormant” virus HIV in specific human cells. And this obligatory cofactor which transactivates the “Dormant” virus in specific human cells are deliberately introduced into mostly black-skinned African people, governed by massive environmental factors as you can read in our book: “Aids and Ebola the greatest crime in medical history against mankind,” in order to depopulate Africa.

    Therefore we will always like to enlighten readers about the real origin of Aids and the true nature of famous international researchers as Robert Gallo.

    And as far as Gallo is concerned, Ricardo Veronesi, professor of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Sao Paulo, was personally informed about the true nature of Gallo’s research long before this controversy turned into a public scandal and as a consequence thousands of scientific Aids dissidents.

    It was no less then Francoise Barré-Sinoussi of the French Pasteur Institute who revealed the criminal intention of Gallo. And not only she became an Aids dissident but also the discover of the HIV virus Luc Montagnier disputed Gallo, the fake discoverer of the HIV virus.

    In their opinion the major bursts in the common scientific approach lies in its ignoring that the pathogenicity of the HIV indeed is governed by multiple deliberate environmental factors. And one of these determinant factors is the PCR test (Polymerase Chain Reaction Test).

    Polymerase Chain Reaction Test

    This test is a technology in molecular biology used to amplify a single copy or a few copies of a piece of DNA across several orders of magnitude, generating thousands to millions of copies of a particular DNA sequence. Especially the diagnosis of hereditary diseases; the identification of genetic fingerprints, used in forensic sciences and paternity testing; and the detection and diagnosis of infectious diseases the PCR test can be used to investigate the connection of diseases to the specific black race. Moreover, PCR can be extensively modified to perform a wide array of genetic manipulations not only in humans but also from microorganisms which causes Aids and Ebola.

    Using and extrapolation of these kind of techniques we can conclude that almost all persons who have HIV in their bodies, were purposely infected with this virus which can lead to Aids. Biowarfare scientists are able to made black-skinned people artificially susceptible for HIV or Ebola by using controlable diseases as a cover-up.

    Most of the biowarfare research using viruses which causes Aids and Ebola was predominantly carried out in Germany and Japan until 1945 and since then mainly in the USA and France, using Nazi and Japanese (military) scientific war criminals.

    The Revealing Voices of Aids/HIV Theory Dissidents

    The official scientific origin of the diverse HIV-strains has been placed somewhere between 1938 and 1948 when scientist T.F. Smith et al published an article in the authoritative medical journal Nature about this period in 1988 named: “The phylogenetic history of immunodeficiency virus”.

    And he was’nt the only scientists who revealed the true nature of the HIV virus. Smith’s efforts to reveal the real origin of HIV was followed, to name a few, by Sharp et al with his article: “Understanding the origins of Aids viruses”, also in Nature, followed by Meyers et all with: “The phylogenetic analysis of the HIVs”. But the most important article is described in the top of the bill of medical journals the Lancet by scientist L.A. Evans et al who discovered the; “Simultaneous isolation of HIV-1 and HIV-2 from an Aids patient”.

    And all these mentioned scientist agreed that the distribution of the HIV virus was an intentional action. Their findings makes it very conceivable that this distribution was intentional because sometimes both the new viruses HIV-1 and HIV-2, respectively HTLV-IV, are existing in one and the same person according to Evans. And because his publication is checked by the editing and scientific boards of the Lancet the outcome of his investigation is true. And this counts also for thousands of publications in other medical journals as described in our book “Aids and Ebola the greatest crime in medical history against mankind”.

    German scientist Wolff Geisler

    According to the famous Aids/HIV theory dissident Wolff Geisler further evidents of the intentional distribution, out of the mentioned simultaneous infection of the same persons, it was described as a second Aids epidemic in the same black-skinned population by an inefficient transmission of the HIV virus. The appearance of this extreme rare retrovirus among the African Aids patients is so conspicious that some world famous scientists uttered a sentence about it. They alleged this to be; “Only another acquired opportunistic infection but rather an additional death sentence”. But? Is it?

    In Africa the probability of an early death of HIV patients is three times bigger then eslwere when HIV patients are simultaneously infected with HTLV-1 as described in the Lancet by Page et al in his scientific publication: HTLV-I/II seropositivity and death from Aids among HIV-I seropositive intravenous drug users (Lancet, 1990; 335: 1439-41), an even more extremely important publication for the Aids/HIV theory dissidents. Because especially HTLV-I, amongst many other HIV viruses, was only demonstrated in Uganda, Ghana, South Africa and Namibia. In HIV patients only in these countries appear simultaneously up till now. According to Wolff Geisler the concommitant existance of HTLV-I and HIV produces the observed rate of Aids patients in Uganda, Kenya and black-skinned people in Florida, USA and some Caibbean Islands, even though in general black-skinned persons are by nature more resistant against HIV-infection than pale-skinned persons (see below). This means the HIV viruses are geneticly engeneered as describe in our book.

    No less than Luc Montagnier et al, the discoverer of the HIV virus stated that this virus is made out of the Nazi eugenics and genetic engeneered experiments as well as the development of Aids causing viruses in horses. In a very talked about article he described in the authoritative Annals of Virology: “A new type of retrovirus from patients presenting with lymphadenopathy and acquired immune deficiency syndrome”: Structural and antigenetic relatedness with Equine Infecious Aenemia Virus EIAV (horse Aids), 1984; 135E: 119-31.

    Equine Infecious Aenemia Virus EIAV (HIV/Horse-Aids) made by Nazi Germany.

    If we compare these findings to our references in:“Aids the greatest crime in medical history against mankind” the book now available at Amazon, the HLA-A, B, C, DR3 and DR5 loci, is examined by the Nazi’s led by Otmar Verschuer.

    In 1956 he joined the American Eugenics Society and worked under auspices tiis of the Rockefeller-fund. He was also head of the Department of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Germany.

    Furthermore we have to take into account that within people who have blood type HLA-DR3 Aids, it is much less common than in people who have the HLA-DR5 type. Under the Nazi’s research, it is important to note that precisely the HLA-DR5 type occurs mainly in Jews. The HLA-DR3 type contrast is most common in dark-colored Africans.

    These two evidences or references are enough to let you know vividly what took place. In general you can say that it is harder for blacks to get Aids than as it is for whites, but blacks have been made susceptible for a broad spectrum of brand new diseases caused by Germans, partly under the auspices of the South African Apartheid regime, and after the war under guidance of the U.S.A.

    Nowadays we now know that monkeys do not get Aids when infected with the human Aids virus. The same goes for tuberculosis until the moment that monkeys in a laboratory made receptive. Therefore black-skinned people are under no circumstances contaminated with Aids by monkeys with or without eating them. That is so to speak a criminal scientific ferrytale.

  2. http://youtu.be/0hRSZMgLI6Y. Humans have been experimenting with biological warfare and controlling over population with disease for a long time. I’m not agreeing with this guy, but I think the rabbit hole is deep and I’m not going down there. Scary stuff

    1. This is why I find discussion groups that include uneducated people to be depressing.

      I prefer to think that the majority of Americans aren’t ignorant asses – the contrary evidence on this site notwithstanding.

      Past misconduct 40 or 50 years ago does not support the preposterous inference that the US Government or the CDC created Ebola.

      And no, the moon landing was not faked either, morons.

  3. true ebola is not a genome disease it will kill anyone but the truth is out of the three infected people notice how right away all the white people got cured except the black Nigerian. interesting!

  4. well the truth is whites have committed genocides towards other races as well America patented the ebola virus whys that? patent number CA2741523A1 besides that after years of denial the American government finally admits and apologizes for forcing central americans guatamalans by injecting syphilis for guinnea pig experiments using humans against their will. Flouchier a dutch scientist modified the H5N1 bird flu to being mutated into airborne in Netherlands.robert gallo was doing experiments with aids virus.

    1. The first major Ebola outbreak was in 1976.

      In 2010, when advances in genetic sciences led some groups to obtain patents on genetic sequences, the CDC patented on strain of Ebola to insure free access to it by researchers.

      However, in 13 June 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the case of Association For Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics – holding that patents on genetic strings are invalid.

      So the CDC Ebola patent is moot.

      In any event, the CDC did not invent Ebola nor did the CDC infect anyone with the disease.

      One would think that anyone literate and intelligent enough to use the Internet would be less gullible. Apparently not.

    2. Cindy, that’s not how it happened. No one injected anyone with anything. The Blacks were told they had bad blood disease – that is to say they already had syphilis and they used them like laboratory rats which is still inexcusable. There is no cure for ebola and your supposition is unsubstantiated. Please provide a link

  5. I’ve learned that people as committed to the bizarre are not going to read anything with an open mind. I see this with the “global warning” hysteria. Facts are ignored. I don’t believe the US could be involved in a conspiracy about Ebola. Simply because thousands of people would be involved and someone would talk!

  6. as i said earlier, even if the truth was presented in your palms….u would say it wasn’t in your palm…have a wonderful day and believe what you know from the bubble you’re in.

  7. not here to debate, but please read with understanding before you try talking over a person

  8. Revelation 1:14-15 “His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.”

    Notice his feet were like brass and then you take that brass element and burn it in fire it will turn black.

    Daniel also saw him and described him as in Daniel 10:6 “His body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in colour to polished brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude.”

    Notice also here that Daniel is describing the “colour” of God’s arms and feet (Polished Brass) just like what John the Apostle saw on the Isle of Patmos about Christ.

    Daniel 7:9 “I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.”

    Notice it says that the hair is like pure wool describing the texture of it which only can be found in Negro descendants; Or the so called “Black” people.

    According to John the Apostle and Daniel the Prophet both were describing a Black Man with Woolly hair unlike a White man with thin Blonde, brown hair or blue or green eyes.

    Don’t you know that Blonde Hair is a sign of Leprosy and is considered in the Bible unclean? Read:
    Leviticus 13:30
    30. “Then the priest shall see the plague: and, behold, if it be in sight deeper than the skin; and there be in it a YELLOW thin hair; then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is a dry scall, even a leprosy upon the head or beard.”

    So Christ could not have any sign of Leprosy for it was a curse and Christ is not Cursed, but a Blessing to the Children of Israel.

    1. Speak Your Mind – You are reading into the Bible something that is not there. And if you are not here to debate, you are on the wrong site. If you read what I said before Jesus was a good Jewish boy, probably would have had brown hair and brown eyes. Unlikely to have been black.

  9. Paul C. Schulte, Why is it you’re trying to school others as if you were there, or you knew for a fact about these black men…..sit your ass in the corner and stop pretending as if you know more than us here….if anything we’re all assuming that it went how we thought….until the truth can come from someones mouth that was there or paper works that states the truth, then we can say yes it’s there in writing, but until then…i suggest that you free your mind and the truth will trail behind..hopefully it catches up to that mouth of yours fast. if they did bad things that’s so evil back then, why is it so hard to believe a modern truth if you can believe old lies? bet you too believe in the bible right? and that jesus was a white man?… why is it that if you said he was of different colour, people get upset? should is colour matters if he was a black man? because if you’re so smart, the bible clearly said he was black…..and yes i know this wasn’t the topic, but it’s an example of how truth can be in your face and you’re still blind to see it.

    1. Speak Your Mind – Jesus was a good Jewish boy, he was not black. He is Semitic. And paintings do not show him as white until about the Renaissance when they start using the Roman/Greek model for Jesus on the Cross.

      Would you like to point out the passage in the Bible which shows he was black?

    2. Speak Your Mind – I don’t know what color Jesus was and I don’t care but I do know that at the time they used apocalyptic prose to get their point across which was a type of story telling. Not to take from truth but to embellish on descriptions. That’s what was done back in those days. Paul thought the Roman Empire was End times. So did John of Patmos and he was trying to get his Churches right with God. So it’s best to keep these things in mind when reading scripture in modern times. imo.

      1. The Bible we use today is not the original words. It was first in Aramic. How many translations have we had? The conference of Rabbis to finalize the Old Testament. What did they leave out? There is much poetic license. A study of theology is the best way to understand the Bible’s many iterations. I don’t recall any comments on the color of Jesus skin. He was probably dark based on where he lived. The messages are the reason for the Bible.

        1. Sandy we do many Bible Studies at my Church and we did a 9 month study on Revelation which was why I was emboldened to comment. The original translations were in Greek. I am referring to what was collected by Bibical Scholars of Paul’s time and he spoke and wrote Koine
          The earliest copy and the 2nd copy of the Hebrew text was in old Greek of the Old Testament
          Anyway – I only know this because I studied it with Pastor and some other ladies. It was real interesting 🙂

          1. Studying the history of the time in concert with the Bible is fascinating. Many Christians question Revelations. I’m told no one knows who added it or when.

            1. There is much controversy. We go with John of Patmos who died in 70 AD. He is not the Disciple. That really would not make much sense imo. No one really could know.

  10. And Europe doesn’t want to be stuck with them. My great grandparents came via ship. Stayed on Ellis Island for a period of time required to assure good health. This is why we should elect Presidents with some common sense. “Warning: if you arrive in US without proof of your original destination and itinerary you may be placed in quarantine.” Would you get on an airplane without all your documentation? Especially if we added “at your expense”

  11. There are no direct flights from Western Africa to the US for Obama to stop. The high risk passengers all arrive in Europe, then fly to the US at some point.

Comments are closed.