Pakistani Lawmakers and Clerics Block Law Imposing Sanctions For Forced Child Marriages As “UnIslamic” and “Blasphemous”

In another disturbing example of the abuses that occur in the absence of church (or mosque) and state separation, Pakistani lawmakers have yielded to the demand of Islamic clerics and killed a law that would have imposed real penalties for those who arrange forced child marriages, including raising the legal age of marriages. Clerics denounced the law as “blasphemous” and against Islam.

Some Islamic clerics have maintained that there can be no age limitation on child brides. They often note that Muhammad married Aisha when she was seven and consummated the marriage at nine years old.

The law would have mandated “rigorous” punishment up to two years in prison for those who organize child marriages. The reforms were rejected by a parliamentary committee on religious affairs after opposition from the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) which was formed in 1962 to advise parliament on the compatibility of laws with Sharia. A representative from the CII had declared the amendment to the Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Bill 2014 as “anti-Islamic” and “blasphemous.” The CII continues to try to shape the nation’s laws in accordance to its view of Islamic values. In 2013, the CII suggested making DNA inadmissible evidence in rape cases and insisted that Islamic law should bar cases where a victim could not provide four witnesses to back their claims.

Marvi Memon, a member of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), had proposed the new law including raising the age of consent for marriage from 16 years to 18 years. As we have seen, children below the age of 16 are routinely forced into Islamic marriages in Pakistan.

45 thoughts on “Pakistani Lawmakers and Clerics Block Law Imposing Sanctions For Forced Child Marriages As “UnIslamic” and “Blasphemous””

  1. BamBam: I do want to call you a name: Citizen of Planet Earth with AAA rating.

  2. Isn’t it nice to be able to bash China, Turkey, Germany, and Pakistan; the last four stories posted? As long as people don’t really get into this IMMENSELY important news happening in our own back yard.

    Oregon Fire Chief Catches FBI Agents Posing as Militia – Quits His Job in Protest
    http://thefreethoughtproject.com/oregon-fire-marshall-resigns-exposing-undercover-fbi-agents-posing-militia/

    “This week, Harney County Fire Marshall Chris Briels resigned after discovering undercover FBI agents posing as militia members near the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, which has been the site of a standoff for weeks now. According to Briels, he found FBI agents who were impersonating militia members lurking around the town’s armory. When he inquired about the undercover operation with county Judge Steve Grasty he was told to back off.

    Just before this discovery was made, there were reports of people who looked like militia harassing locals, which is uncharacteristic of the protesters who initially assembled at the refuge. It turns out that these militia members suspected of harassing locals were actually undercover FBI agents.

    During an impromptu press conference, Briels explained how he was so disrespected in his encounter with Grasty and was so disgusted with the situation in general, that he no longer wants to work for a government that he does not believe in. Briels added that he would still be helping people in the community with fire prevention and other issues that he has helped with in the past, but he will just no longer be doing it as a government employee. Briels went on to describe how he exposed undercover FBI agents who had come to town and were creating problems amongst the locals.

    When announcing his resignation, Briels described his encounter with the judge.

    “I’ve been told by Steve to distance myself from this committee of public safety. I’ve been told that we don’t know what we’re doing. I’VE BEEN TOLD THAT MY LIFE IS IN DANGER, I’ve been told all kinds of things. I will not be told what to do. I have my own mind, and I will use my own mind, not somebody else’s,” Briels said.”

  3. Olly, be careful. When you go ad hominem, you upset the censor. Maybe he didn’t notice your aggression.

  4. Ralph Alamo,

    Are racism, bigotry or Islamophobia prohibited by the Constitution?

    Seems a lot like freedom of thought. And a lot of scientists say that thought precedes speech.

    Speech is still free, right?

  5. This article is insensitive to Islam. You cannot mention anything bad in connection with Islam as Islam is always good and peaceful. And anyone who says or thinks differently is a racist, a bigot, and an Islamophobe. JT of all people should know and observe this “progressive” principle, even though it conflicts with reality. Reality is overrated anyway.

  6. Ben Franklin, 1775,

    the Law of Nations

    “…has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress,…”

  7. NEWSFLASH –

    Talking Points Memo

    “An 85-year-old Houston lawyer filed suit Thursday asking a federal court in Texas to rule on whether Sen Ted Cruz (R-TX) is eligible to be President. It appears to be the first lawsuit challenging the Canadian-born Cruz’s eligibility on the grounds that he does not meet the Constitution’s “natural born citizen” requirement. But if Cruz-opponents were looking for the ideal test case to trip up his candidacy, this may not be it.
    __________

    __________

    Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at §§ 212-217,

    § 212: Natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens – it is necessary that they be born of a father who is a citizen. If a person is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his countr

    During 1775, Charles Dumas, an ardent republican [as opposed to a monarchist] living in Europe sent three copies of Vattel’s Law of Nations to Benjamin Franklin. Here is a portion of Franklin’s letter of Dec. 9, 1775 thanking Dumas for the books:

    “… I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations. Accordingly that copy, which I kept, (after depositing one in our own public library here, and sending the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed,) has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author…”

  8. Olly,

    “or white males believing that they are naturally superior to women and dark skinned people,”

    Affirmative action guarantees that natural superiority will not manifest – except in the NFL, NBA, MLB, etc.

    America; the land of the free…

  9. Those “clerics” need to be gang raped in the rear ends in front of just two witnesses. Then when they try to prosecute show em the Sharia.

  10. When are we going to stop pouring money into these oppressive and abysmal states. If banning child marriages is blasphemous and unIslamic, it would appear than a number of the charges made about the comfort level of Islam with what we see as child sexual abuse are true.

  11. “or white males believing that they are naturally superior to women and dark skinned people,”

    LOL! Naturally.

  12. Dave,
    Morality gets hijacked by PEOPLE with an ideology, not an ideology alone. One can apply the same argument with guns. It is how the people use the ideology that threatens others. The human race can exist with or without religion IF they subordinate their ideology to natural rights. Religion, in western cultures promotes humility and that is the first virtue lost when our western cultures place themselves as the supreme authority. We end up with a culture and by extension a government that believes IT creates all the rights of it’s people.

  13. Those who hold power tend to believe that it is natural, prescribed by god, for them to have that power. So whether we are talking about clerics believing that they know what is best for everyone else, or white males believing that they are naturally superior to women and dark skinned people, or men who believe that animals were put on earth for them to enjoy killing, it’s all the same type of mental gyration of believing that when one is enjoy oppressing others, it is natural, ordered by god, and must never change.

  14. I have a great idea. Are you ready? Are you holding onto your turban or hijab? Let’s bring more of these throwback, primitive, backward, turds into our societies! Yes, open the floodgates and let them pour in. The more the merrier. After all, don’t forget, Islam is irrelevant and has nothing, whatsoever, to do with their lunacy. Simply our imagination and our deep-seated prejudice that prevents us from seeing Muslims as normal, productive members of a civilized society. We are to blame. It’s their culture–their religion–and we need to start respecting their love for legalized child rape and marriage. Keep up the insanity, folks, with the PC calls that this isn’t about Islam. Keep welcoming in more and more of these mentally disturbed individuals and see what happens as they breed like rabbits and engulf our societies with this madness. Want to call me a name? Bring it on! I’m proud to be called anything that you feel identifies with keeping America alive and well. You may have a death wish, for your government, your community and your family. I don’t.

  15. “One of the great tragedies of mankind is that morality has been hijacked by religion. So now people assume that religion and morality have a necessary connection.

    “I’m appalled by what we all see on the news every day — massacres, atrocities, injustices, outrages of all kinds. When I see what’s happening, I sometimes wonder if the human race deserves to survive.”

    Arthur C. Clarke

  16. The Pakistani government is clearly a bunch of Islamophobic secularists imposing heretical natural rights on their citizens.

Comments are closed.