Late Friday, President Donald Trump carried out one of his primary campaign promised this week with a suspension on the entry of all refugees to the United States and an order for “extreme vetting” as a condition for entry for some foreign citizens. The order below specifically suspends entry of all refugees to the United States for 120 days, bars Syrian refugees indefinitely, and blocks entry into the United States for 90 days for citizens from seven countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The order had immediate impact on travelers who were denied entry to the United States and held at some airports like JFK. Lawsuits have already been filed challenging the executive order but those challenges will face a considerable challenge in seeking an injunction by a federal court.
Curiously, the order notes the 9-11 attacks but the order does not cover the countries that were the sources for those attackers, including Saudi Arabia and UAE. I think that this order is a mistake and contradicts our values. However, I do not agree with some of my colleagues at GW and other law schools that the order is clearly unconstitutional. Courts are not supposed to rule on the merits of such laws but their legality. I think that the existing precedent favors Trump.
First, this is not a religious ban. When it was first discussed on the campaign, it was described as a ban on Muslims. This is not a religious ban. It certainly can be opposed as having that effect but there are a wide array of Muslim countries not covered by the ban and would not be impacted by the restrictions. A court cannot in my view treat this order as carrying out a religious ban as it is currently written. (Trump’s comments that he wants to prioritize Christians could raise more compelling arguments of religious discrimination).
Second, the law largely suspends entry pending the creation of new vetting procedures. That is based on a national security determination made by the President. Courts have generally deferred to such judgments. A president’s authority is at its zenith on our borders. Hillary Clinton herself campaigned on carefully vetting refugees (though she favors increasing such entries). In a November 2015 national security speech at the Council on Foreign Relations, Clinton said “So yes, we do need to be vigilant in screening and vetting any refugees from Syria, guided by the best judgment of our security professionals in close coordination with our allies and partners.”
Finally, there is precedent for limited entry from particular countries going back to some of the earliest periods in this country. The earlier immigration laws include the 1875 Page Act which focused on Asian immigrants and those believes to be engaged in prostitution or considered convicts in their native countries. Then there was the infamous 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act. Then there were other measures limiting immigration from particular areas like the 1906 “Gentleman’s Agreement” (Japanese aliens) and the or the 1917 Immigration Act (“Asiatic Barred Zone”). In 1921 and 1924, Congress passed the “Quota Acts” limiting entry from disfavored countries. of nations from whom no further immigrants would be accepted. In every case, immigration policy continued to develop as a series of widening, discriminatory exclusions. It was not until 1965 that we broke from our long and troubling history is such discrimination. However, The 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act contains section, 212(f) that gives sweeping authority on the exclusion of certain aliens:
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
Even President Jimmy Carter used such authority. Executive Order 12172 involves an order to force 50,000 Iranian students living in the United States report to an immigration office and face possible deportation. Thousands were deported. Indeed, President Obama repeatedly claimed sweeping executive authority over such national security and immigration policies. As recently as 2016, the Obama Administration opposed courts even ruling on issues of executive power on immigration, insisting that “complex debates over immigration policy that the Constitution reserves to the political Branches of the National Government.” Democratic members supported those arguments, including many who filed in support of the executive power.
None of this means that I personally support this action. I do not. However, one’s personal views should not influence one’s constitutional analysis in such a case. There are grounds to challenge the order and they are not frivolous. However, the precedent supports President Trump. Here is the executive order:
“Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States.” Following is the language of that order, as supplied by the White House.
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and to protect the American people from terrorist attacks by foreign nationals admitted to the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. The visa-issuance process plays a crucial role in detecting individuals with terrorist ties and stopping them from entering the United States. Perhaps in no instance was that more apparent than the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, when State Department policy prevented consular officers from properly scrutinizing the visa applications of several of the 19 foreign nationals who went on to murder nearly 3,000 Americans. And while the visa-issuance process was reviewed and amended after the September 11 attacks to better detect would-be terrorists from receiving visas, these measures did not stop attacks by foreign nationals who were admitted to the United States.
Numerous foreign-born individuals have been convicted or implicated in terrorism-related crimes since September 11, 2001, including foreign nationals who entered the United States after receiving visitor, student, or employment visas, or who entered through the United States refugee resettlement program. Deteriorating conditions in certain countries due to war, strife, disaster, and civil unrest increase the likelihood that terrorists will use any means possible to enter the United States. The United States must be vigilant during the visa-issuance process to ensure that those approved for admission do not intend to harm Americans and that they have no ties to terrorism.
In order to protect Americans, the United States must ensure that those admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes toward it and its founding principles. The United States cannot, and should not, admit those who do not support the Constitution, or those who would place violent ideologies over American law. In addition, the United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry or hatred (including “honor” killings, other forms of violence against women, or the persecution of those who practice religions different from their own) or those who would oppress Americans of any race, gender, or sexual orientation.
Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from foreign nationals who intend to commit terrorist attacks in the United States; and to prevent the admission of foreign nationals who intend to exploit United States immigration laws for malevolent purposes.
Sec. 3. Suspension of Issuance of Visas and Other Immigration Benefits to Nationals of Countries of Particular Concern. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall immediately conduct a review to determine the information needed from any country to adjudicate any visa, admission, or other benefit under the INA (adjudications) in order to determine that the individual seeking the benefit is who the individual claims to be and is not a security or public-safety threat.
(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the President a report on the results of the review described in subsection (a) of this section, including the Secretary of Homeland Security’s determination of the information needed for adjudications and a list of countries that do not provide adequate information, within 30 days of the date of this order. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide a copy of the report to the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence.
(c) To temporarily reduce investigative burdens on relevant agencies during the review period described in subsection (a) of this section, to ensure the proper review and maximum utilization of available resources for the screening of foreign nationals, and to ensure that adequate standards are established to prevent infiltration by foreign terrorists or criminals, pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens from countries referred to in section 217(a)(12) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12), would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants and nonimmigrants, of such persons for 90 days from the date of this order (excluding those foreign nationals traveling on diplomatic visas, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visas, C-2 visas for travel to the United Nations, and G-1, G-2, G-3, and G-4 visas).
(d) Immediately upon receipt of the report described in subsection (b) of this section regarding the information needed for adjudications, the Secretary of State shall request all foreign governments that do not supply such information to start providing such information regarding their nationals within 60 days of notification.
(e) After the 60-day period described in subsection (d) of this section expires, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the President a list of countries recommended for inclusion on a Presidential proclamation that would prohibit the entry of foreign nationals (excluding those foreign nationals traveling on diplomatic visas, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visas, C-2 visas for travel to the United Nations, and G-1, G-2, G-3, and G-4 visas) from countries that do not provide the information requested pursuant to subsection (d) of this section until compliance occurs.
(f) At any point after submitting the list described in subsection (e) of this section, the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security may submit to the President the names of any additional countries recommended for similar treatment.
(g) Notwithstanding a suspension pursuant to subsection (c) of this section or pursuant to a Presidential proclamation described in subsection (e) of this section, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may, on a case-by-case basis, and when in the national interest, issue visas or other immigration benefits to nationals of countries for which visas and benefits are otherwise blocked.
(h) The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall submit to the President a joint report on the progress in implementing this orderwithin 30 days of the date of this order, a second report within 60 daysof the date of this order, a third report within 90 days of the date of this order, and a fourth report within 120 days of the date of this order.
Sec. 4. Implementing Uniform Screening Standards for All Immigration Programs. (a) The Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall implement a program, as part of the adjudication process for immigration benefits, to identify individuals seeking to enter the United States on a fraudulent basis with the intent to cause harm, or who are at risk of causing harm subsequent to their admission. This program will include the development of a uniform screening standard and procedure, such as in-person interviews; a database of identity documents proffered by applicants to ensure that duplicate documents are not used by multiple applicants; amended application forms that include questions aimed at identifying fraudulent answers and malicious intent; a mechanism to ensure that the applicant is who the applicant claims to be; a process to evaluate the applicant’s likelihood of becoming a positively contributing member of society and the applicant’s ability to make contributions to the national interest; and a mechanism to assess whether or not the applicant has the intent to commit criminal or terrorist acts after entering the United States.
(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in conjunction with the Secretary of State, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, shall submit to the President an initial report on the progress of this directive within 60 days of the date of this order, a second report within 100 days of the date of this order, and a third report within 200 days of the date of this order.
Sec. 5. Realignment of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for Fiscal Year 2017. (a) The Secretary of State shall suspend the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) for 120 days. During the 120-day period, the Secretary of State, in conjunction with the Secretary of Homeland Security and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall review the USRAP application and adjudication process to determine what additional procedures should be taken to ensure that those approved for refugee admission do not pose a threat to the security and welfare of the United States, and shall implement such additional procedures. Refugee applicants who are already in the USRAP process may be admitted upon the initiation and completion of these revised procedures. Upon the date that is 120 days after the date of this order, the Secretary of State shall resume USRAP admissions only for nationals of countries for which the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence have jointly determined that such additional procedures are adequate to ensure the security and welfare of the United States.
(b) Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual’s country of nationality. Where necessary and appropriate, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall recommend legislation to the President that would assist with such prioritization.
(c) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the entry of nationals of Syria as refugees is detrimental to the interests of the United States and thus suspend any such entry until such time as I have determined that sufficient changes have been made to the USRAP to ensure that admission of Syrian refugees is consistent with the national interest.
(d) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and thus suspend any such entry until such time as I determine that additional admissions would be in the national interest.
(e) Notwithstanding the temporary suspension imposed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may jointly determine to admit individuals to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the admission of such individuals as refugees is in the national interest — including when the person is a religious minority in his country of nationality facing religious persecution, when admitting the person would enable the United States to conform its conduct to a preexisting international agreement, or when the person is already in transit and denying admission would cause undue hardship — and it would not pose a risk to the security or welfare of the United States.
(f) The Secretary of State shall submit to the President an initial report on the progress of the directive in subsection (b) of this section regarding prioritization of claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution within 100 days of the date of this order and shall submit a second report within 200 days of the date of this order.
(g) It is the policy of the executive branch that, to the extent permitted by law and as practicable, State and local jurisdictions be granted a role in the process of determining the placement or settlement in their jurisdictions of aliens eligible to be admitted to the United States as refugees. To that end, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall examine existing law to determine the extent to which, consistent with applicable law, State and local jurisdictions may have greater involvement in the process of determining the placement or resettlement of refugees in their jurisdictions, and shall devise a proposal to lawfully promote such involvement.
Sec. 6. Rescission of Exercise of Authority Relating to the Terrorism Grounds of Inadmissibility. The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall, in consultation with the Attorney General, consider rescinding the exercises of authority in section 212 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182, relating to the terrorism grounds of inadmissibility, as well as any related implementing memoranda.
Sec. 7. Expedited Completion of the Biometric Entry-Exit Tracking System. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall expedite the completion and implementation of a biometric entry-exit tracking system for all travelers to the United States, as recommended by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.
(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the President periodic reports on the progress of the directive contained in subsection (a) of this section. The initial report shall be submitted within 100 days of the date of this order, a second report shall be submitted within 200 days of the date of this order, and a third report shall be submitted within 365 days of the date of this order. Further, the Secretary shall submit a report every 180 days thereafter until the system is fully deployed and operational.
Sec. 8. Visa Interview Security. (a) The Secretary of State shall immediately suspend the Visa Interview Waiver Program and ensure compliance with section 222 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1222, which requires that all individuals seeking a nonimmigrant visa undergo an in-person interview, subject to specific statutory exceptions.
(b) To the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of State shall immediately expand the Consular Fellows Program, including by substantially increasing the number of Fellows, lengthening or making permanent the period of service, and making language training at the Foreign Service Institute available to Fellows for assignment to posts outside of their area of core linguistic ability, to ensure that non-immigrant visa-interview wait times are not unduly affected.
Sec. 9. Visa Validity Reciprocity. The Secretary of State shall review all nonimmigrant visa reciprocity agreements to ensure that they are, with respect to each visa classification, truly reciprocal insofar as practicable with respect to validity period and fees, as required by sections 221(c) and 281 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1201(c) and 1351, and other treatment. If a country does not treat United States nationals seeking nonimmigrant visas in a reciprocal manner, the Secretary of State shall adjust the visa validity period, fee schedule, or other treatment to match the treatment of United States nationals by the foreign country, to the extent practicable.
Sec. 10. Transparency and Data Collection. (a) To be more transparent with the American people, and to more effectively implement policies and practices that serve the national interest, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall, consistent with applicable law and national security, collect and make publicly available within 180 days, and every 180 days thereafter:
(i) information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been charged with terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; convicted of terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; or removed from the United States based on terrorism-related activity, affiliation, or material support to a terrorism-related organization, or any other national security reasons since the date of this order or the last reporting period, whichever is later;
(ii) information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been radicalized after entry into the United States and engaged in terrorism-related acts, or who have provided material support to terrorism-related organizations in countries that pose a threat to the United States, since the date of this order or the last reporting period, whichever is later; and
(iii) information regarding the number and types of acts of gender-based violence against women, including honor killings, in the United States by foreign nationals, since the date of this order or the last reporting period, whichever is later; and
(iv) any other information relevant to public safety and security as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, including information on the immigration status of foreign nationals charged with major offenses.
(b) The Secretary of State shall, within one year of the date of this order, provide a report on the estimated long-term costs of the USRAP at the Federal, State, and local levels.
Sec. 11. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
This blog is rapidly becoming unreadable. Former fan turned off.
Good bye.
I agree! JT should change the font to something that is more readable. The letters are way too light.
Go here, and read the “grumpy wizards” comparison.
https://premium.wpmudev.org/blog/typography-tips/
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Hell! All this time I thought it was my eyes going all cataract on me.
No, I am young and these fonts are killing my eyes.
Like these people say, in a marginally readable font. I think they are trying to create customers for their services.
http://www.aoa.org/patients-and-public/caring-for-your-vision/protecting-your-vision/computer-vision-syndrome?sso=y
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
I just wish the American Indians had had better immigration laws. Perhaps, they could have prevented the families of every one on this blog and their ancestors from coming to this land.
Really? Shall we also address the fact that they too were immigrants? Of course, we also know that they treated each other’s territory, women and assets with great respect and did not aggress the other….not.
If the Chinese hadn’t suddenly destroyed their fleets, which put any European ships to shame, the west coast would be very different. If the Vikings hadn’t withdrawn from the N. E. the Danes would have ruled New England.
It’s in our nature to aggressively spread, whether Native American or others. Being of Irish heritage, I had great “affection” for England, but have moved on.
Now you do know that Africans sold Africans to Europeans in order to acquire/dominate territory…?/?? Without that African “industry” the slave trade would not have happened.
Oh yes, the folks occupying Central and South America before Europeans were benign and lovable, right?
There you are I left an answer but it went elsewhere. What tribal group?
Exactly where in the Constitution does it say that a foreigner has the RIGHT to come to America just because they want to??? I ain’t seen it. And I sure ain’t seen no exception for either Hispanics or Muslims from war-torn countries.
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Ellis Island was proof of the non-right to enter, even if European. Steerage was screened and some set aside and others returned. The reasons? Usually illness related. Others screened on the ships.
I was part of the project to restore Ellis Island. Some decry the conditions of its heyday but it actually was much better than given credit and was pretty efficient in getting folks through to the mainland and provide some medical help for those being returned—tragic for them but then anitibiotics and other treatments weren’t available for them or the potential contacts although some slipped through.
The Spanish flue actually originated in the US, went over with our soldiers, spread and came back with their compatriots who fanned out into the country.
My grandfather came on a ship and waited with his parents on Ellis Island for their sponsors came from Iowa to get them. He was 12 and they had classes to speak English and played outside a lot.
That’s because it isn’t there. Only in the minds of mystically inclined left wing fascists who think ‘saying’ is the same as ‘doing.’ and fairy tails equal a done deal. But setting this last bunch up was really pathetic. Plenty of time to stop them boarding elsewhere. However ten were detained and are being vetted so we might want to wait on that conclusion.
Never mind they’ll find another way to show their ass.
our USA has no obligation to comfort these foreign people. our USA has to obligation to assist France and Germany if they insist on taking these alleged “victims”. they can do what we did when we were a colony of England: fight back. and by the way, France only assisted our revolution because they hated the English.
Do I worry about people blowing themselves up, someone knifing people around him? You bet I am. If I thought Obama, in his eight years, was ensuring the safety of the people of the United States, had done anything to adhere to his pledge we might have been better off. Hillary never gave us the feeling of she would protect us. I voted for Trump because I knew he would take action. I saw a photo of him climbing the stairs of Air Force One alone. It was a little dark and he looked tired. He didn’t need this job. He certainly didn’t need the money. Even Charles Kruthammer has said some positive things. He’s working unbelievable hours, his wife and young son are in New York. Quit complaining. Pray for him.
Amen! Although I worry less about Muslim terrorists than I worry about our current crop of inner city black terrorists who car jack and commit crimes with glee.
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
And don’t forget our white identity regressive extremists who are setting it all up.
They are usually wussies who get their violence thrills vicariously thru race-baiting the poor negroes. Plus, most of them are unarmed, and manage to stay out of prison inducing acts.
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Massive confusion at airports with many travelers held in detention,….lunacy.
Since this has been in the works for two years and the order common knowledge for a couple of days why did you looney clooneys allow those folks to get on the airplanes to begin with? You needed time for your phony demonstrations? What a shabby sick way to use those people. I’m in favor of keeping them and sending you packing. We don’t need any more left wing fascists that’s why we voted you OUT!
Pathetic way to use people. Just pathetic.
I’m not sure the President thought this through. Valid Visas and Permanent residence holders should be on another level.
Ever read the law on that? Any of those can be changed, withdrawn or temporarily suspended. the time period is remarkably short considering the mess that has to be cleaned up, Now we hear claims of instant vetting when just a few short weeks ago the story went the other way.
In any case the only thing permanent IS a Certificate of Citizenship. I’ve got one. Do you?
For sure, this move is a display of both incompetence and cruelty.
Now we know how Italy felt when it went through Berlusconi, the hair, the womanizing, the media garbage.
I disagree totally with your writing. This is a Hat Dance, by Trump. It is based upon Religious beliefs. I was unaware that radical Muslim was a citizenship. Just like being raised Jewish. Is it a Religion or a Citizen from Israel?
I am surprised you posted this thread.
When the Japanese were interned because of race, Hoover said to FDR, this is unconstitutional.
So how much did The Internment cost the USA? I agree with your colleagues.
As there are rouge employees in the Whitehouse blabbing on Twitter the Stupidity of the Trump administration, the FBI is forcing Twitter to give the Government its Users Information.
Does not sound anyone is thinking on Pennsylvania Ave. A lot of ditto heads all Hat, no substance.
ummmmm Learn to spell? and if FDR the Progressives main hero knew it was unconstitutional why did he not stop it for tht matter why did his State Department ban Jews and Italians escaping from the Nazis and Fascists in Europe. You picked the wrong hero to quote he was an early version of LBJ and nothing else. Rouge is a color and Rogue is the word your searching for to describe the agencies put in place by Obama. Bight Me is a town in Maine.
Sorry, my grandfather came in the late 1880’s.
Of course. No one on the face of the planet or any other is guaranteed the right to immigrate or enter our country. But the President AND the Congress in particular are fully charged with protecting this country and it’s citizens without exception.
– That’s really all there is to know thats pertinent. After that it’s up to the three branches of government and beyond them the voters that put them there. Nothing new it’s been the expected policy change for at least two years.
– The rest of it is quibbling or fine tuning. Why didn’t Obama accept Syrian refugees that were the subject of genocide for example and the statistical difference is satanic. Heal thyself before asking to violate our rule of law any further..
– Best we can find out the ratio was 50,000 with a goal of 100,000 to 55. (Google number of refugees from Syria by religion accepted into the USA.) it’s a common subject of discussion.
So once again I repeat the following stating why are you worried about torture when many of you voted for continuing it by re-electing Bush and electing then re-electing Obama?
and
How do you offer rights to anyone who is not a citizen and at the same time deny them to your own citizens?
– I refer to replacing probable cause and due process with suspicion of without excluding in the definition the citizens much less just letting it sit there waiting to be used.
Without those two answered you aren’t in the conversation with any validity.
– Rules for arrest on charges of commiting acts of terrorism or supporting acts of terrorism as exteneded and broadened in a paragraph earmarked in to the end of year budget bill passed 31 December 2015 and signed by President Obama. Senate vote was 85-15 the 15 said not for the reason I just stated. He then went on television in front of a huge display of the Consittution and bragged about it. It’s actually a part of the Patriot Act.
– Your fearless golfpro failed to rescind that rule from applying to the Citizens at any time a DHS agent finds the need…including what I’m doing right now.
– If applied there are no civil rights. They don’t have to prove anything nor admit to the arrest. The rest is strictly fourth branch of government procedures and you don’t have the right to know what happened. For all i know there is no need to have records kept. As a result if they wish to use waterboarding or electricallystimulate the testicles there is nothing to stop them meaning at the least the one agency which now is under command of General Mattis …..so we may, as citizens be somewhat safer.”
– They have at least an eight if not a fifteen year head start in mindset though.
– The other one is the suspensionm of the Constitution within 100 miles of the borders or coastlines And that was covered in the discussion between Turlow and Cusack and re-posted in this blog September 2015.
If you can’t justify that then just shut up and go away. You deserve what you asked for.
.
This was known for two years and my question is …..why didn’t these people vote if they wanted to keep letting people in and why did the aircraft bring them today anway. It was common knowledge all over the world except for the protesters or are they just playing stupid as usual.
These leftists have to be a bunch of sick puppies to use those folks in this disgraceful immoral manner. Of course when the ratio was 50,000 Muslim versus 55 other religions we didn’t here frijoles out of them.
Everyone knew this mess your fearless golfer set up would have to be fixed but do anything to help? Oh No…We’d rather show our ass
Pathetic excuses for human beings to set those people up this way. They deserve bettere. You don’t.
Justin Trudeau
2 hrs ·
To those fleeing persecution, terror and war, Canadians will welcome you, regardless of your faith. Diversity is our strength. #WelcomeToCanada Nice, i
Canada can have all the potential terrorists it wants! Maybe Canada can even import some Muslim rapists from Germany to provide some entertainment for the Canadian ladies!
Go Trump!
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
We dont want Canada taking them in because they will drift across our borders. Trump will have to build a Wall between the U.S. and Canada. True Dough needs to leave office.
Now I have it on good authority from my Canadian friends they do NOT want the USA to open the border to Cuba. Reason is that’s their favorite winter playground and the only one they can afford what with the Five dollar a day 14 year old hookers and cheap rum etc. Of course the guy who told me that made sure I wouldn’t repeat it within earshot of their wives. Actually that is a true story and they were dead serious. Why? Because everywhere Gringos go they jack up the prices to Club Med levels.
True. As an adopted member of the Red Lake peoples in Minnesota i can only state ’twasn’t my fault I was kidnapped by my parents at age one!’
But I do take responsibility for everything after I became a full citizen with the right to vote at age 21. If you are familiar we lived in Ponemah and Redby where my father was the government school teacher and introduced cinnamon rolls to the kids. I was five at the time. In return we were taught to make home made smoke houses for fish using crates from the fishery. The testing of the fish didn’t leave much so we kept inviting them back and it always turned into a big community event.
now that was for someone else Squeeky but who knows with this lashup where it will go. For you THANKS for that JUST FACTS tip. I’m going to finish up one test and having no books to order yet go nose around it’ and I’m all signed up.
DDT is performing a necessary task, that of a continual tuning of national security by focusing on immigration from certain obviously dangerous places. However, more than that, which was being done under Obama and would have continued under Clinton, DDT is blustering in the most despicable manner. His actions have been painted with targets and by a broad brush. A simple tightening of the vetting procedures with the obvious ongoing research and amend that any program needs would have been all that would have been necessary. It is as if DDT is continuing his tirade of how important he is, to himself, and all the dupes who voted because of these blustering tirades. Three to five million illegal immigrants voted against him. His inauguration crowds were the largest in history. The Mexican President didn’t call off the meeting-it was mutual. The sad part is that none of this is important, except to an extremely insecure buffoon who was born into wealth and privilege, is rich from the rich, and suffered bankruptcies in most of his adventures. There is a continuing of a theme here, a megalomaniac theme. Will he be ordering us to wear our underwear on the outside of our pants so that he can check that it has been changed daily? Getting close.
The Executive Order banning certain Muslims and Syrian refugees includes only those countries where Trump doesn’t have a Trump investment. These countries do not have Trump investments, and the countries that do aren’t listed, which includes Saudi Arabia and others.
Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald 3h3 hours ago
These stories are horrifying to read. Many of these people have lived legally for years in the US w/their families http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-immigration-chaos-idUSKBN15C0LD?utm Trump’s actions are very,very cruel. The lawsuits will be filed Monday and some say his actions are constitutional and some say not so we shall see.
Why isn’t he including Saudi Arabia and the UAE? Is it because there’s no “refugees” or economic migrants from those countries?
I feel like a bystander in my country. I don’t have an opinion. I’ve got other worries, such as earning a living.
To his credit, he’s keeping his promises from the campaign trail.
We’ve not bombed/invaded SA or the UAE. They are our “allies” because they buy lots of weapons and help keep the Middle East in chaos. PLUS as an added bonus they graduate wahhabist Muslims who go oft to other countries and set up madrassas to breed hateful terrorists. eternal strife – what’s not to like?
Also, Obama already put those 7 countries on a watchlist back in 2015. Have to keep an eye on those we have destroyed.
No countries on the list where he has businesses.
Because he has businesses in those two countries.
Thank you for this guidance–FYI for all: https://youtu.be/0qQt-iEIKeU
I tried to address some of these concerns (worries?) in an earlier post on the subject of:
“Confusing Historical Parallels”
https://chaunceytinker.wordpress.com/2016/10/08/confusing-historical-parallels/
Just one quick point “Chancey Tinker”: You are assuming that they are “muslims”–and they are not–and it just seems to me that your narrative is echoing exactly what the lowlifes are doing……..If you were being bombed, what would you do?
You didn’t read that post very carefully. What I actually said was:
As Glenn Greenwald recently eloquently blogged, it’s amazing to see the extent to which so-called “Progressives” have crawled into bed with the worst war mongers, CIA operatives, and other Deep State agents desiring to operate as a Shadow Government, directly the nation constantly toward war.
The Progressive Liberal Baby Jesus Obama not only continued the two wars he swore to end (Iraq and Afghanistan), he utterly destroyed Libya, he destroyed half of Syria and would have finished the job if Putin did not stop him, and supplied all the arms for the Al Saud crime syndicate’s war crimes in Yemen.f
All the above, but God forbid if Trump has the audacity to claim border controls, and to decide which non-citizens can and can not enter.
A very thorough and masterful treatise on this subject, no matter what your Chicago relatives seem to think.
Fortunately for lawyers, they never need to worry about the origins of our laws. The rest of us, we are not so lucky. We must question EVERYTHING, even the very foundations we are sitting upon, as I did here:
“Amending the First Amendment”
https://chaunceytinker.wordpress.com/2016/09/07/amending-the-first-amendment/
(Be sure to read to the end of this 4-part series before you jump to any conclusions about what I am saying here).