Cambridge Faculty Told Not To Use “Genius” and “Brilliance” Because Of Sexist Connotations

Jimmy_Neutron_Boy_Genius_filmI guess Jimmy Neutron will have to live with “Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius .  Cambridge University examiners are being told to avoid the words “flair”, “brilliance” and “genius” in the review of student work because these terms are sexist and “carry assumptions of gender inequality.”  It appears Madam Curie was just a really solid researcher.

At first I assumed that this was a gag but it appears to be a serious position taken by adults like lecturer on Gender History Lucy Delap, who must be herself really smart but no genius.  Delap insists “Some of those words, in particular genius, have a very long intellectual history where it has long been associated with qualities culturally assumed to be male. Some women are fine with that, but others might find it hard to see themselves in those categories.”

So once again we will alter basic nouns and adjectives in case some people might feel uncomfortable with others (including females) being described as “brilliant.”  Delap insists that language must change to combat the “male dominated environment” at the school by eliminating such descriptive terms based on intellect.

 

So the school, according to Delap, is “really try[ing] to root out the unhelpful and very vague talk of ‘genius’, of ‘brilliance’, of ‘flair’ which carries assumptions of gender inequality and also of class and ethnicity.”

All I can say is that Delap and her colleagues have succeeded. That effort is anything but brilliant.

57 thoughts on “Cambridge Faculty Told Not To Use “Genius” and “Brilliance” Because Of Sexist Connotations

  1. Thank you for this report. It amazes me how the elite have dumbed down our language one more time. How soon before they will only accept telling everyone, “You are so smart.” Maybe that will become politically incorrect as well. What do those with such “wisdom” spend their time doing?

  2. Parsley, sage, Rosemary and thyme. Hail to Rosemary. Mary with a flower. One should not sing such songs. All names need to be gender neutral. Jenny can be Jerameny and Joan can be Joanny cum lately. Fred can be Fredrickey. Rosa Parks can be Roe Parks.

  3. Perhaps we need to go back to, and more fully utilize, the concept of gender endings on English words. We used to have “actor” and “actress,” but now they are all actors. Ditto for “hero” and “heroine.” So maybe we now need “genius” and “genia” (or maybe “genienne.”) Then nobody would be offended … (yeah, right!)

    Other Endo-European languages have strict gender endings on words (e.g., in Russian), which date back to the original ancestor languages.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s