THE SHOOTER: James T. Hodgkinson

 

James Hodgkinson alleged shooter in Alexandria incident.This is James T. Hodgkinson, 66, who has been identified as the shooter in today’s tragedy.  He is from Belleville, Illinois and appears a political activist. He is the owner of JTH Inspections.  He has a criminal record, including battery.

 

170614-james-hodgkinson-ew-1143a_19c6702f72a0b77e6f5cdfb83a401ca8.nbcnews-ux-600-480

Judging from a Facebook page for a user named James Hodgkinson from Belleville, Illinois, he appears a critic of both President Donald Trump and Republicans.  He is shown here calling for higher taxes and he appears to be wearing a t-shirt wih the word “Republican” on it.

He appears a supporter of Senator Bernie Sanders and volunteered on this campaign.  Sanders has denounced him and his actions.  

Hodgkinson wrote such messages as “Trump is a Traitor. Trump Has Destroyed Our Democracy. It’s Time to Destroy Trump & Co.”  Just two days ago, he wrote  “I Want to Say Mr. President, for being an ass hole you are Truly the Biggest Ass Hole We Have Ever Had in the Oval Office,” He is also a critic of Hillary Clinton who he referred to as “Republican Lite.” Indeed, he wrote “You’ve been warned DNC. I will NEVER vote Hillary. A nomination for Hillary equals a win for Trump. #NOTWithHer.”

The hatred for Republicans is obvious. In October 2015 he wrote “Thieving Republican Congress Strikes Again!!!”

241 thoughts on “THE SHOOTER: James T. Hodgkinson”

  1. OT – re: DNC Fraud Lawsuit –

    “Co-operation across traditional ideological barriers was visible in recent days when a The Oathkeepers, a right-wing militia group, volunteered to protect attorneys suing the DNC on behalf of Bernie Sanders supporters. This occurred after it was reported by Disobedient Media and elsewhere that the same attorneys had received a series of bizarre, ominous phone calls, the first of which matched the number registered to former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ office. The help extended to Jared and Elizabeth Beck of the DNC lawsuit by the Oathkeepers was one of a growing number of instances of co-operation between left and right leaning anti-establishment movements”

    source:

    http://disobedientmedia.com/2017/06/legacy-media-uses-reality-winner-arrest-to-sow-division/

  2. Why not direct our thoughts to the real cause? Since the left had their ass kicked in the election its been none stop lies, innuendo and hatred by them and their media. Kathy Griffin, the mock killing of Trump in the park. Maybe this will wake the Republicans up and start going on offense. The democrats are no longer the party of our parents and grandparents, it’s a party taken over by progressive radicals and a dangerous media.

  3. His Facebook page has been taken down. Someone posted “he finally did it”, I could not get back to that extremely odd comment, there were literally thousands of comments hitting the thread over several minutes. I wonder if he was being followed, even harassed by the Secret Service? Several FB commenters wrote that they thought it was a hoax/false flag. Considering the repeal of the Smith-Mundt Act and the contentious gun debate, anything is possible.

    1. Someone needs to take a close look at what he’d been doing for two months — the two months that he’d been living in the area. Like Omar Mateen, was he on the radar of any law enforcement agencies? And yes, as you note, was he on a Secret Service list? (It would be interesting, too, to get more input from the person who posted the “he finally did it” comment.)

      1. http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/06/james-t-hodgkinson-identified-as-shooter-of-gop-lawmakers.html

        “For the past several weeks Hodgkinson had been “living out of a gym bag” in Alexandria, the city’s former mayor Bill Euille told the Washington Post. Euille says he spoke to the shooter nearly every morning in the lobby of the a YMCA near the ball field where the shooting took place. “He was a very friendly person,” Euille said. Another witness told the paper that Hodgkinson aroused his suspicions.”

        If this person’s “suspicions” were aroused, had he been reported to any agency or agencies?

      2. “The panel had been due to debate the “Sportsmen’s Heritage and Recreational Enhancement Act,” which includes 18 provisions related to guns and hunting, as well as other recreational sporting and outdoors provisions.
        The measure would make it easier to purchase silencers, transport guns across state lines and ease restrictions on armor-piercing bullets”

        http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/14/politics/gun-legislation-hearing-congressional-shooting/index.html

        The Secret Service could have let this happen. The intelligence agencies are highly politicized. Remember the dancing Israeli’s in Jersey City on 9/11?

        1. You imbecile! They weren’t dancing Israelis! They were dancing and celebrating Arabs! Get a f’ng clue.

  4. There, told you so, see, just sayin, ah that warm fuzzy feeling. Nothing says you’re right like…..

  5. I’m just hoping no one goes for some kind of misguided revenge because of this. The govt. has wanted to turn us on each other and we should not let them do so. This man has a history of violence. Using ideology as an excuse for trying to kill people is common as mud in this world. It is also disgusting. But that is what this is–a violent man committing violence, using his political beliefs as “cover”. He has every right to express his hatred of Trump and no right at all to harm others.

    As to Bernie’s statement,he can take that and shove it. He’s never met violence against people who live overseas that he didn’t love. He regularly votes for wars and he adored Trump’s bombing of civilians in Syria. I’m barfing about his hypocrisy.

    1. I am more concerned that this will be a “Reichstag Fire,” emboldening right-wing interests to suppress minorities or anyone who doesn’t agree with them.

      1. The Democrats/Neocons have proven themselves to be the masters of false flag operations. Need we go into John Kerry’s YouTube videos and the like? Nuland’s cookies in Kiev perhaps??

    2. Jill, re Bernie – with great sadness I must concur with you. I have been an avid Bernieorbuster for over a year and now have to let it go. However, I do give Bernie credit for getting young people to wake the F&ck up and to inspire all the Demexiters.

      Progressives had a “People’s Summit” last weekend in Chicago – glaringly Tulsi Gabbard was not present.

      1. That is very interesting about Tulsi Gabbard. Thanks for sharing that Autumn. Looks like the Clintons’ “purple revolution” may be underway.

      2. Your full of it, you haven’t changed, your just a little embarrassed. You’ll be back with you socialist crap in a little bit.

        1. Pismo, I said I was done with Bernie. I am still a Progressive. Tulsi Gabbard 2020

      1. Most of America has had enough of these Commie/Nazi Authoritarian type , Soros/Demo party funded American hating Trash!

        Many of us believe Pres Trump/AG Sessions/Military/Police/50 million vets & patriotic citizens are ready to take every Legal means to rounding them up with arrest their azzes & criminal trials.

        It should start today with Trump going after CNN.

        https://www.infowars.com/200k-cash-prizes-infowars-launches-operation-expose-terrorist-mediakathy-griffin/

        Left Planning Terrorist Attacks This Summer / Citizens Launch Movement Against Jihad Loving Media
        The Alex Jones Channel

        16,082 views
        Published on May 31, 2017

        Alex Jones announces his latest contest, where you the people can help expose the mainstream media for what they are. Terrorists.

  6. Hodgkinson seems like a typical smug little Democrat, who really believes all the bullsh*t Democratic Party Narrative. And that his beliefs makes him sooo special, that either the law, or other people’s rights don’t matter to him at all. Because he is sooo good, and sooo smart.

    There is not much difference between him, and the SJWs who shut down Trump’s Chicago rally back in 2016, or who continue to shut down Milo and Ann Coulter’s speeches. Or, the Democrats who vow to protect illegal aliens, or to stick with the Paris Accords. Or, who illegally avow to keep Chick Fil A out of their town, because the owners don’t approve of gay marriages.

    In other words, a typical Democrat.

    If Hodgkinson was black, there would be streets named after him.

    Squeeky Fromm
    Girl Reporter

    1. “If Hodgkinson was black, there would be streets named after him.”

      *************************************

      Yeah all he got was a crummy disease, sort of.

    2. Well this just proves that there’s racism, and then there’s crazy racism. “A street named after him if he were black.” Really? You really think that moves the narrative?

  7. LIBERAL DEMOCRAT REDISTRIBUTIONIST PARASITE FROM THE BANKRUPT STATE OF ILLINOIS;

    “WILL KILL FOR ‘FREE STUFF!'”

    1. How much did Barry’s and Clinton’s new RESIST movement push this guy over the edge. Or Senator Harris inflammatory banter ignite him or Colberts and Kimmel endless dialogue attacking our President.

  8. Still waiting for Sen. Sanders and all that have promoted violence to denounce these acts (including some media). I won’t hold my breath.

    1. Just heard Sanders on Bloomberg Radio denouncing the shooting and all violence in the political process.

      The part I heard was a pretty good speech and crystal clear – violence has no place in US politics.

      1. bfm – violence is part of the history of American politics. Bernie is just afraid somebody is going to shot his ass, too.

        1. ” Bernie is just afraid somebody is going to shot his ass, too.”

          What is wrong with self interest in politics? Sounds like an excellent reason to take a strong stand against violence in politics to me.

          BTW, Pelosi, who is not one of my favorite politicians, made some pretty good remarks that we should all stand together as Americans and against violence.

          1. bfm – Pelosi is nervous about her a**, too. Evidently, the Dems are claiming they are receiving calls saying they are next.

  9. Ballots Not Bullets It appears being in the unreprsented Constitutional Center was a wise choice.

  10. His call for higher taxes is admirable, but Congress is about LOWERING taxes on the rich, so I understand his frustration, but not his attention-getting action this morning.

  11. I am waiting for some liberal to say it is somehow Donald Trump’s ‘fault’ due to the ‘climate of hatred’ he has created. And thus such action, while regrettable, is understandable.

    Just another sign we are coming apart at the seams, Balkanizing.

    I want a divorce! And liberals should be supportive since without evil Red Staters holding them back, the utopia should be around the corner.

    1. Nop problem It’s given your ideology it’s called the USSR feel free to emigrate anytime. We can do without the evil Marxist Leninists.

      1. Where in the world (besides North Korea) are there any actual Marxist-Leninists in power ? Certainly not Russia. And even back for most of the USSR days, it was not really Marxist-Leninist.

        1. And even back for most of the USSR days, it was not really Marxist-Leninist.

          That’s a pretty stupid thing to say.

          What we tend to have in this world nowadays would be variants of Peronism (in Latin America) and what Thos. Sowell has called ‘the Vision of the Anointed’ in occidental countries (which incorporates the ruin of national states and the replacement of democratic institution with rule by cadres). A crucial component of the latter is to create income streams outside commerce through institutional manipulation and to replace the discretion of businessmen with the discretion of lawyers. (And the discretion of police officers with that of lawyers as well).

          1. Yes, but nobody is a Marxist-Leninist anymore. Perhaps, historically, certain communal societies (Shakers, Amana colonies), but not anymore.

    2. OK, I’ll say it, yes indeed this is to a substantial extent “Donald Trump’s ‘fault’ due to the ‘climate of hatred’ he has created. And thus such action, while regrettable, is understandable.” And the NRA’s fault, for proselytizing that more and more guns is always better, and that any angry nutcase should certainly have access to guns.

      I do agree with Antonio that it would be better if the US could split into West Coast, East Coast, and Flyover. Flyover could institute an ethnic and religious cleansing program, and eliminate all taxes and services. From afar, Russia would laugh with glee.

        1. Yes, there will have to be some gerrymandered boundaries to make it work. Maybe liberal “exclusion zones” in the red states. Triple concertina wire around college towns …..

          1. JayS – don’t forget the guard towers with 50 cal. machine guns.

      1. OK, I’ll say it,

        He made a caricature, and you’re presenting yourself as absolutely earnest while aping that caricature.

      2. You libs are you going to love this. I am a proud Hispanic who voted for Donald Trump! Grew up in a “flyover” country state too. Take “flyover country” to the barrio anyday.

        Now, if I were a liberal Hispanic, you would be ki***ng my butt in an attempt to suck up. But since I’m not, libs don’t know whether to shoot me or salute me.

        Don’t you love identity politics?

          1. @Jay

            Why did a Hispanic guy vote for Trump?

            It isn’t hard to figure out.

            I dislike political correctness and multiculturalism, believe assimilation is the best way to go.

            I only play the ethnic card with s**tlibs so I can watch them go into convulsions. Unlike myself, libs really DO believe in identify politics.

      3. In Re. to the most common Progressive complaint about Trump, his alleged “climate of hatred…”

        You, I believe, are one of millions of Progressive Liberal Democrat dolts who perceive Jesus Obama as a peace activist, in spite of his hiring HRC who hired al-CIAda to arm and train alleged Islamic “moderates” to anal rape then decapitate (see videos) legally installed Libyan President Ghadaffi. ISIS (remember, alleged “moderate” Islamics) now own and operate ISIS stronghold Libya, which ISIS caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Muslims in Libya and those who died fleeing Obama’s hell hole there.

        And then there’s Obama’s war in Syria, a steaming pile of hot blood and murder for which Progressives give Jesus Obama a total pass. BTW, dear Progressive dolts: please list every single specific reason the USA should be interested in Syria (hint: there are none).

        More war.
        More debt.
        Less personal freedom and liberty.

        From here on out to infinity, that’s everything you can know for sure, and nothing else.

      4. Jay S.,
        Your caricatures expose your prejudice.

        Do you want ideological purity? It sounds like it.

        I prefer E. Pluribus Unum.

    3. Remember when we thought the “IT’S BUSH’S FAULT” would never go away? But this is Barry’s fault. No one is connecting the new “RESIST” to any of this?

        1. Shannon – Maybe they should charge Resist with Aiding and Abetting?

          1. I blame the person who hated so much that he sought to harm others. The rhetoric doesn’t help nor does the calls inciting violence but we have choices in our lives. This person CHOSE to be a criminal.

    4. Antonio, Already happened om Chuck Todd’s show this afternoon on MSNBC. He had several MSM reporters[Ruth Marcus from WashPo was one] on a panel and they all agreed Trump is the cause of all the vitriol and maybe this will get his mind right, As predictable as the tides.

  12. I don’t suppose it occurs to anyone that most of the folks who kill people with guns don’t really obtain them legally … and the ones who defend society and themselves usually require them to do so, especially when having to return fire in an active shooter situation …

  13. Another nut who shouldn’t have ever had an assault rifle. Wondering if this shooting might change any Republicans’ minds about the appropriateness of letting civilians have such weapons. I hope it does, and I won’t even cry “Hypocrites” if they do, because SOMETHING’S GOT TO CHANGE ABOUT THE PROLIFERATION OF THESE CRAZY WEAPONS ON OUR STREETS!

    1. LOL! JWBurdick is taking the MSNBC talking points. We need more good people w/ guns.

      1. Right, Nick, MORE “guns.” Of course, you’re kidding, right? These aren’t defensive weapons for people to use to protect themselves, these are 95% military assault weapons. A handgun can surely be kept for security (though an awful lot of children are shooting other kids – even their Mothers and Fathers – with them), but there is NO reason for ARs to be on the streets. And, BTW, let’s say that MSNBC is adopting MY talking points. 🙂

        1. These aren’t defensive weapons for people to use to protect themselves, these are 95% military assault weapons.

          They aren’t.

        2. JW:

          You don’t know what an assault weapon is. To you any scary gun is an “assault weapon.” In reality it’s a weapon designed for combat that fires its magazine automatically if the trigger is depressed once. The typical mass shooter’s weapon is a semi-automatic pistol which fires only once when the trigger is depressed. In this case, the shooter had an undisclosed long gun that was almost assuredly a semi-automatic rifle which is not an assault weapon and hasn’t been since Vietnam. And the answer to gun violence is trained citizens with concealed weapons who can repulse attacks as the brave Capitol Police did here. You want to be a sitting duck, please be my guest, just don’t ask me to sit on your pond with you when the lead flies.

          1. These shooters, stabbers, people plowing cars into pedestrians – they do not stop until faced with an armed person, either citizen or police. France has strict gun laws. It made a very safe space for terrorists to shoot at ducks in a barrel.

            Amazingly, making drugs, murder, rape, and larceny illegal did not make those acts go away. By definition, law abiding citizens follow gun laws, and criminals do not. Without a fire arm, humanity is reduced to might makes right until and unless the police arrive. Which means that women have little means to defend themselves. Imagine, a crazy ex stalker is breaking down a terrified woman’s door. She would have to call the police, explain the situation, give her address, and wait for the police to drive there, assess the situation, and gain entry. Think she’ll make it?

            My relatives find, on average, 25 rattlers on their ranch annually. Want to go root around in the bushes with a blunt shovel, either torturing the poor reptile with repeated strikes, or leaving your tender toes vulnerable to strike? I only find a few rattlers per year, but they get quite long here, and they are fast. They move towards you, not away like a garter snake. I wouldn’t want to get that close to a grown one with a shovel.

            Dictators always take great care to disarm their civilians.

            I would say that every time a car is used to kill someone, the Liberals do not clamor to ban cars. And that would have been true until recently. Los Angeles is implementing Vision Zero, which means they want to achieve zero traffic deaths by 2025. How will they accomplish this? By purposefully creating massive gridlock, making everyone go so slowly that the goal is that speeds will become non fatal. However, this of course shunts angry drivers into residential streets…with all the kids playing. And the general consensus of outraged Angelenos is, why should we law abiding citizens be punished for reckless drivers? Sound familiar?

            I am curious, why is it that whenever there is an act of violence, the furor is focused on the particular tool used rather than the criminal? Like, it would be OK if he’d only used a car. I don’t want to see gun violence decrease; I want to see all violence decrease. I understand the concern about firearms. A shooter can hurt someone out of reach. That’s both the fear, and the advantage, of a firearm. That is why someone weaker can protect themselves from someone stronger. However, in countries where gun ownership is essentially banned, such as UK, violence actually increased. Thieves target homeowners when they are home, because they are guaranteed to be unable to defend themselves, and one can assume they’ve turned the alarm off until they go to bed. True, gun violence decreased as guns decreased, but violence increased. And of course this does not even touch on the main source of gun violence in the US, which are gangs. It is already illegal for a felon to own a gun, and yet felon gang members shockingly do not follow the law.

            http://kfiam640.iheart.com/onair/john-and-ken-37487/road-diets-one-lane-madness-in-15913835/

        3. JWBurdick, you seem not to be to proficient regarding gun management and you seem suggest handguns. Not to imply anything, but it is very difficult to shoot a handgun and hit the target when one is faced with a threat. Better off using a shotgun. 😉

        4. What? Really? We still have people who believe the whole “assault rifle” myth? Who still think these rifles are magical killing machines? Maybe look into things a little bit, beyond what MSNBC tells you about these scary weapons. “A handgun can surely be kept for security.” Thank you, master. It would appear you don’t know much about those, either. Wow.

        5. You ding-a-ling! What are you going to do with a pistol, if a whole gang of savage negroes attacks your home??? You might get a few of them. But social media is providing a method for large numbers of thugz to attack in a group. Such as in the various mall attacks, and the mass Negro attack on the BART train a few months ago. Not to mention a Ferguson scenario. Because as the sister of the dead thug in Minneapolis said last August, “Y’all burnin’ down sh*t we need in our community. Take that sh*t to the suburbs. Burn that sh*t down! We need our sh*t! We need our weaves!”

          Or in Chicongo, where there are like 600+ gangs, and about 70,000 gang members. Let that thin blue line of cops walk away, and that army (equal to several military divisions) will rip thru the city and the burbs like the Mongol Hordes. That is why you need an AK-47, and lots of ammo.

          Squeeky Fromm
          Girl Reporter

      2. Yes, everybody at that baseball game should have been armed to the teeth with assault rifles, safeties off. At the first loud noise – fire away !

      3. And just how do you tell who the “good people” are? Republican Party membership cards?

    2. There is no such thing as an ‘assault rifle’. There are merely semi-automatic rifles tricked-out in various ways.

      Notable success in restoration of public order has been had in certain loci, notably New York City. Their success did not incorporate changes in the state law regarding firearms. It incorporated better staffing of police forces and more efficient deployment of police officers. Over the period running from 1990 to 2010, the homicide rate in the Five Boroughs declined by 82%.

      Interest in New York City’s successes has been spotty (see the ruin that is Baltimore) and the usual corps of judges, ‘public interest’ lawyers, and sociologists have attempted to defame police and public officials in this regard.

      The response of partisan Democrats to problems in public order and inconvenient successes in the promotion of public order has been diversionary exercises in attempting to stick the bill for urban crime with small-town-and-rural hobbyists. They do this, because it’s culture war 24/7 with partisan Democrats and they have no defensible objects and no real idea of how to repair the common life.

        1. The term ‘hair splitting’ does not mean what you think it means.

        2. Hair-Splitting: characterized by or fond of small and overfine distinctions.
          “legal experts have a particularly hairsplitting mentality”
          synonyms: pedantic, pettifogging

          An AR-15 is ALL-BUT a fully automatic military assault rifle. The only real difference. To say it is not (as I argued) a “95% assault rifle” is hair-splitting.

          1. JWBurdick – a gun either is or is not an assault rifle. Tour pseudo-definition is inaccurate. Mespo is right on this one.

          2. “An AR-15 is ALL-BUT a fully automatic military assault rifle. The only real difference. To say it is not (as I argued) a “95% assault rifle” is hair-splitting.”

            An AR-15 is not fully automatic and not an assault weapon. It is a semi automatic rifle with scary, black plastic, pistol grip stock and fore grip.

            Your position makes about as much sense as claiming that one of those econobox cars with a tall spoiler bolted to the trunk and a resonator instead of a muffler is a real race car.

            Sweet dreams, just don’t let them turn into delusions about cars or guns.

          3. JWBurdick – I think you are confusing a semi-automatic with a fully automatic weapon of war. A fully automatic weapon automatically advances the next round and fires as long as the trigger is depressed. It “sprays” bullets until you either run out of ammo or release the trigger. For a semiautomatic firearm, you chamber the first round and the first pull of the trigger is a long pull. After that, every time the gun fires, the next round is chambered, so all you have to do is pull the trigger. You do not need to chamber a round, but you do need to pull the trigger, even if it is a short pull.

            Unless you are skeet shooting or using a pump action shotgun, the vast majority of firearms are semi automatic. “Assault rifle” is a manufactured term that basically refers to a weapon that looks militaryish, with a pistol grip and usually plastic parts. The grip make the gun more comfortable to hold. Some of them can have less recoil. Basically, depending on your standpoint, they either look “cool” or they look “scary”, but they fire the same lead as any other firearm of the same caliber. I could have a cute little bedazzled chrome plated gun with Hello Kitty stickers all over it, and it would still be deadly.

            Again, the way the gun looks doesn’t matter. Fully automatic firearms made after 1986 are banned in the US, and owning one made before then is quite difficult. In Europe, the fully automatic weapons flooding the region is on the black market, military grade.

    3. With all the leftists loonies on the loose you want me to give up my right and duty to protect myself? Is you crazeee? Go back to the USSR if you can find it..

    4. 2nd Amendment

      A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

      1. Like Scalia, George is ignoring the preamble phrase: “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state…” Hence his reading of the Second Amendment is misguided since, y’know, there are no more “well-regulated militias” here – because now America has its own actual Marines, Army, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard.

        But I’m gonna decamp from this conversation as it has skidded completely off into ad hominem attacks against liberals, democrats, blacks, etc. This guy was a gun nut and, yes, a Bernie Sanders supporter. Buit arguing as you folks have is much like saying “it rained when we took George to the picnic last week, so if we don’t take him this week, it won’t rain.”

        1. JWBurdick – every male from 18-45 is a member of the Arizona militia. It is part of our Constitution. You should be more well-read.

        2. JWBurdick, I like these sentences that address your concerns: ” But a militia would be useless unless the citizens were enabled to exercise themselves in the use of warlike weapons. To preserve this privilege, and to secure to the people the ability to oppose themselves in military force against the usurpations of government, as well as against enemies from without, that government is forbidden by any law or proceeding to invade or destroy the right to keep and bear arms… .”

        3. Thank you. The American Founders provided individual citizens the right to keep and bear arms in order to choose wisely and join the appropriate, militia of their choice.

          The American Founders conducted a military revolution against the British Empire by voluntarily joining militias and using the arms they kept and bore as “Minutemen” et al.

          The American Founders created the CITIZENS as the SOVEREIGN and assigned the GOVERNMENT as the SUBJECT of the SOVEREIGN.

          The American Founders intended free and self-reliant citizens to be the SOVEREIGN and make decisions.

          The American Founders provided the right to individual citizens to keep and bear arms in order they they may be ready to decide on and select a militia to join.

        4. After the 2nd Amendment is repealed, only the criminals will have guns…

          oh, and the politicians and celebrities.

    5. SOMETHING’S GOT TO CHANGE ABOUT THE PROLIFERATION OF THESE CRAZY WEAPONS ON OUR STREETS!

      Please explain how you determine if a weapon is crazy?

      1. Olly:

        The crazy ones get out of their gun cabinets, load themselves and shoot without the aid of humans. They are crazy and bad.

          1. Olly – are these crazy guns related to the crazy trees that used to jump out at my car when I was drunk driving?

            1. 😀 The very same family tree Paul. The world is full of crazy, inanimate objects. I’ve witnessed people getting attacked by all manner of objects, most of them coincidentally had other people attached to them. I think they weren’t pleased to be hauled around by these objects as evidenced by the weird sort of angry look on their faces.

              1. Olly – so what we are talking about is inanimate objects taking control of animate objects and forcing them to attack other animate objects or inanimate objects?

    6. isnt the proliferation of the crazy “nut” that we need to worry about… ? the item used is not the problem.. could have easily done more damage with an SUV or truck….. Inanimate objects don’t do anything on their own…

      1. Big Bernie Sanders supporter. This just doesn’t fit the narrative!!!!

        1. Nick, I agree – sounds like the “Berniebro” meme cooked up the DNC. Bernie is pulling even more voters from the Dims – coincidental?

        2. technically Bernie supposedly lost because he was Pro Gun. Oh the Irony of Pro Gun people blaming Bernie. I thought yall were pro gun? Pro NRA? Except when you get aimed at right. smh He’s no Bernie supporter. He’s an extremist, who use anybody..

      2. Nick,
        Interesting that most people don’t know when they watch Flow on Progressive insurance ads and even worse…..purchase Progressive products that the company is owned by Soros.

        Hint: …..the NAME!

        1. This means you’re not watching. He condemned the attack in the most vivid and strongest language – the minute he was told this assault-weapon-carrying lunatic had been a volunteer on his campaign:

          Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Wednesday condemned the shooting by a gunman who had volunteered for his presidential campaign, calling the attack that wounded House Majority Whip Steve Scalise a “despicable act.” “I have just been informed that the alleged shooter at the Republican baseball practice is someone who apparently volunteered on my presidential campaign,” Sanders said in a statement. “I am sickened by this despicable act. Let me be as clear as I can be. Violence of any kind is unacceptable in our society and I condemn this action in the strongest possible terms.”

          Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/14/sanders-condemns-shooting-by-gunman-who-volunteered-for-his-campaign-239550

          Denouncing enough and fast enough for you?

          1. Snoop Dog shoots Potus in a video.
            Griffin beheads Potus in a photo shoot.
            NEA takes 30 million tax dollars and funds Shakespeare in the Park and assassinates Potus.
            How fast did Bernie and the other Unhinged ALT-Left denounce these treasonous acts?

            http://yournewswire.com/tim-kaine-civil-war/

            1. I didn’t hear from them for 8 years of death threats against Obama? And ol Palin had crosshairs on Obama and other Democrats. O_O nobody denouncing from the Right. How long did it take for Trump to comdem the stabbing deaths that included Muslims in Oregon? Probably way slower than Bernie . That and there were actual people killed in that incident. While I don’t know about this one so far I only know serious injuries. With a gun? So killing people just fine but harming them requires a massive outcry. So far it’s only the idiot gunman.

            2. Exactly. The loons create, foster and promote a toxic and deadly atmosphere where photo shoots create images where it appears as though a sitting President has been beheaded. . .where pop icons boldly and proudly speak of blowing up the White House. . .where plays are produced and performed showing the President being assassinated. . .then the culprits, who have encouraged, either through their complicity or silence, suddenly get up on their hind legs and, allegedly, denounce the evil and despicable acts that they, through their participation, have promoted and promulgated.

        2. I had no idea, I will cancel and go to another company. Thanks for the FYI.

        3. Many multiple individuals own 580,000,000 PGR shares as stockholders or mutual fund share owners.

          Progressive Corp (NYSE:PGR)
          Institutional Ownership
          62.98% (As of Today)

          Institutional ownership is the percentage of shares that are owned by institutions out of the total shares outstanding. As of today, Progressive Corp’s institutional ownership is 62.98%.
          _________________________________________________________________________________

          “Chris Kahlert‎
          to
          Flo, the Progressive Girl
          December 14, 2011 ·

          No, George Soros does not own or control Progressive Insurance. However, the chairman of the Progressive Corporation, Peter Lewis, is a known ‘political associate’ of George Soros… Kinda like work for Darth Vader huh Flo?
          1 Like2 Comments
          Share”

      3. Soros:

        A convicted felon. Insider trading France

        A Nazi collaberator who admits feeling no remorse about confiscating property from Jews.

    1. I remember when my Liberal friends and family earnestly told me they believed that Trump was going to send out the death vans. People even sincerely told me that they thought that the US was going to be no longer safe for Jews because Donald Trump got elected.

      And yet…it was the Leftist extremists who have looted, rioted, burned, and become violent. It is the far Left that has become increasingly anti-Semitic. It is the Left who have become anti free speech, pro blasphemy laws, and increasingly violent in their rhetoric on the mainstream media, social media, and in general conversation. I hope they sort this out and the extremists take a good, hard look in the mirror soon.

Comments are closed.