We have previously discussed the harsh limitations on free speech and free press in Thailand. Now, a leader scholar, Sulak Sivaraksa, 85, has been arrested for simply questioning the factual accuracy of the famed “elephant battle” held over 400 years ago. He merely responded to questions from fellow academics by cautioning “not to easily believe in things. Otherwise, you will fall prey to propaganda.” For that, he was charged with “lèse-majesté,” or defaming the monarchy — a ludicrous charge that could bring a 15-year prison sentence.
The elephant battle involved an alleged duel in 1593 between King Naresuan and Crown Prince Mingyi Swa. Many scholars have noted that historical records do not show any formal duel, though an elephant battle did occur. Sivaraksa was clearly referencing this research, but Naresuan is idolized by the Thai military.
The arrest of Sivaraksa is only one of more than 100 lèse-majesté arrests since 2014, according to the International Federation for Human Rights.
Sivaraksa told NPR: “In this country, myth becomes truth and I questioned the myth.”
The arrest of Sivaraksa is an utter disgrace by another U.S. ally which denies the most basic civil liberties to citizens and non-citizens alike.
11 thoughts on “Leading Thai Scholar Arrested For Challenging The Myth Of The Famed “Elephant Battle””
Anyone been to Bangkok, smelled the Chao Paya River? Then you understand Trump’s comment.
Tusk, tusk, there my audacious scholar.
East of Corfu the Ten Commandments Don’t Apply. That is a sign on the end of a wharf in southern France.
One elephant was Bhuddist and the other was Muslem. The referee was Hindu.
We went to the animal fair.
The birds and beasts were there.
The old baboon by the light of the moon..
Was combing his auburn hair.
The monkey he got drunk…
And fell off the elephant’s trunk.
The elephant sneezed and
Fell on his knees and
That was the end of the monk, the monk, the monk!
Thailand… but, no Turley post about the teacher recently arrested at a school board meeting in Vermillion Parish, La.
Under Elizabeth I he would have lost his head.
Only those found guilty of plotting to overthrow the crown.
David Benson – only those Elizabeth thought were trying to overthrow the throne. 😉
Comments are closed.