The controversy surrounding porn star Stormy Daniels deepened yesterday. Stephanie Clifford (AKA Stormy Daniels) was reported to have finally and clearly denied that she had an affair with President Donald Trump. A statement was released under her signature with the help of counsel. However, in her interview with late night host Jimmy Kimmel, she seemed to suggest that it was not her signature. The coy denials and suggestions of Daniels in interviews is getting quite old. However, her interview left the impression that that someone faked her signature, a possible crime. In addition, if she did not have an affair with Trump, she could be liable for defamation but there are some interesting legal twists.
In the letter signed January 30, 2018, Daniels reportedly said “I am not denying this affair because I was paid ‘hush money’ as has been reported in overseas owned tabloids. I am denying this affair because it never happened.” First and foremost, the letter is signed by her theater name not her legal name.
More importantly, she seemed to back off the statement with Kimmel. When Kimmel asked about her 2011 interview on the affair and whether it was true, she “define true.”
Kimmel asked if she had a nondisclosure agreement related to her reported relationship with Trump, Daniels replied ambiguously again with “do I?” Kimmel then noted “if you didn’t have an non-disclosure agreement you most certainly could say you don’t have an non-disclosure agreement, yes?” Daniels simply replied “you’re so smart, Jimmy.” This may be Daniels’ notion of clever but she then appeared to deny the authenticity of the signature. Kimmel noted that the signature looks different and she responded . “That doesn’t look like my signature, does it?”
Here is the earlier signature:
If someone is forging her signature, it could be a crime though this is not her legal name or identity.
Daniels’ 2011 interview was never litigated as defamation because it was never published. It could have been litigated as slander but Trump’s counsel succeeded in deterring the magazine with a threat of a defamation lawsuit (despite the problematic elements of such a case). The statute of limitations on defamation in New York and California is one year. However, if she were say that the interview’s representations were true, that would constitute a new act of defamation if the representations are untrue.
However, Daniels seems intent on milking the controversy for publicity while playing coy with the facts. The suggestion that the signature is fake could itself lead to an investigation or even a defamation lawsuit. Tom Namako said that the new statement was “issued” by someone. If that person was a lawyer, Daniels is suggesting that he participated in a false or fraudulent statement.
Her lawyer is Keith Davidson who insisted “The signature is indeed hers as she signed the statement today in the presence of me and her manager, Gina Rodriguez.” He added that “She was having fun on Kimmel and being her normal playful self.”
I would like to avoid thinking about Daniels’ “playful self” but this is sheer stupidity. More importantly, Daniels is a liar no matter what account is true. She seems to relish the fact that truth means nothing to her or its implications for a matter of public importance. As for counsel, the act of a client suggesting that you are distributing a forged signature is not “playful” it is suggesting an unethical practice.
Since Turley is so obsessed with Stormy Daniels, cannot get enough stories about her, and has already made arrangements to book tickets for all of her forthcoming Chicago shows, as a benefit for Turley and others curious about whether the handwriting in the two documents above are, in fact, Stormy Daniels’ signatures, I provide the following exemplars of her handwriting below:
The first document above is a perfect match for the signature style in the example below:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/STORMY-DANIELS-and-JULIA-ANN-Sexy-Adult-Stars-Auth-Autographed-Photo/1830148
The second document above is a perfect match for the signature style in the other example below:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/STORMY-DANIELS-personally-signed-10×8-ADULT-FILM-STAR-/130967415712
Since I know a thing or two about authenticating signatures, I should mention that people do not always necessarily sign documents the exact same way. No doubt, since “Stormy Daniels” is not the person’s real name, she has created the signature specifically for signing under her assumed persona. When people do this, their handwriting samples are even more likely to differ from sample to sample.
So, now you know. Both signatures on the documents above were executed by the same person and that person was the person who goes by the name of “Stormy Daniels” based on signatures obtained in person.
But, please continue to obsess on and don’t let the facts get in the way of your Leftist scenario. You never have before, so why start now?
Pork em if ya gottem.
Reblogged this on The Inquiring Mind.
Stormy Daniels claims that she slept with a man she knew was married. She claimed she pretended to desire him, to welcome advances, and to be into it, but she gave no reason. She claimed she had unprotected sex with him, exposing his wife to any STD she may have had. She is paid to pretend to enjoy sex for money. If her claim was true, then did she pretend to enjoy sex with a man she knew was married because he was famous, and it might be good for her career, where she gets paid to have sex on camera?
Then, years later, when she had a baby, she said she felt bad about sleeping with a man, once, whom she knew was married. So bad, in fact, that she tried to make an international scene that would have embarrassed the wife she claimed to have helped betray, giving an interview with lurid details, an interview she later retracted.
She gave a signed statement declaring that the alleged affair never took place, and blamed the media for quoting her exact words.
Then she gave a more recent interview again alleging in affair.
Then she gave a signed statement declaring there was no affair.
Then she gave an interview in which she coyly refused to answer questions about the affair, a non disclosure agreement, and even the signature of the letter she just submitted.
If she signed a non disclosure agreement, then she took money. If what she claims (at two points) was true, then she had sex with a man she didn’t want, tried to make money off of it giving an interview to a tabloid, and then took money in exchange for not airing her dirty laundry. Basically, it was taking money for sex, through the laundering of some intermediaries. The interview was taking money for sex, assuming she was going to be paid or otherwise financially benefit. If her original allegation was true, then she should not have signed a non disclosure agreement or accepted any money.
If her twice signed declarations of there never having been an affair are true, then what the heck does she think she is doing to Melania and Barron? Is she an extortionist? She’s clearly a liar; I’m just unclear about which part.
At this point, she has so thoroughly destroyed her credibility flip flopping her story that I’m tired of it.
If a man cheats, I blame him and any mistress who knew he was married equally. I suspect this woman has taken it further into extortion.
You are amazing: you criticize Stormy Daniels, who apparently wasn’t married at the time, for screwing your President, because he was a married man. You criticize her for engaging in unprotected sex, thus possibly exposing the Slovenian Princess to an STD. WHAT ABOUT HIM? HE was the married man, HE was the father (of a very young child), HE was the husband. HE invited her to his hotel room, from which she thought they were going to depart to go to dinner, because he invited her to dinner, so she dressed up, but he was in lounging clothes, obviously with other plans that didn’t involve leaving his hotel room, because he ordered room service. SHE enticed him? Do you really believe this?
She takes money for performing sexual acts on film. Yes, but so what? She never pretended otherwise. Unlike YOUR President, who made some statement about faith in God last night*, at least she’s not a hypocrite. She’s playing little games with the $130K that his campaign, apparently, paid for hush money and a denial document, but WHAT ABOUT HIM? SHE owes Barron and the Princess some duty, which is higher than HIS duty to his wife and child?
It still shocks me to see people defend that creature and when women dump on other women over and above men. No wonder people like you aren’t offended by his genital grabbing.
*didn’t watch it live–saw a clip of this. At the time of the ego fest, I was enjoying “King Kong” on TCM, because I just had a lovely dinner of pan sautéed tilapia which I didn’t want to throw up.
Natacha:
Please read my post more carefully:
You said: “You are amazing: you criticize Stormy Daniels, who apparently wasn’t married at the time, for screwing your President, because he was a married man. You criticize her for engaging in unprotected sex, thus possibly exposing the Slovenian Princess to an STD. WHAT ABOUT HIM? HE was the married man,”
I actually said, “If a man cheats, I blame him and any mistress who knew he was married equally. I suspect this woman has taken it further into extortion.”
What part of blaming a married man and a woman who knowingly sleeps with him equally was reprehensible? Please outline your argument…
I have to agree with Natasha on this. The married person is the one who has taken the oath before God of fidelity to his/her spouse. The married person is the one who has a moral obligation to not humiliate his/her spouse and children by engaging in a sordid affair and possibly bringing diseases into the home. I place all the blame on the married person who cheats.
Are YOU a citizen of the United States? Then, whatever YOU think, Donald J. Trump is YOUR President. Plus, no document is Legal unless you sign it with your Legal name. However, the aforementioned can be argued in a Court of Law. And yes, I do have a Law Degree.
So weird!! Where are the Clinton’s??? Sounds like something they would do – pay off a bimbo like her. The truth always comes out.
Stormy Daniels hurts JT’s feelz, by being too coy for a courtroom.
Lighten up JT, she is playing a game, and you fall for it.
Of course she is. Her looks will only last so long, so she needs to milk this scandal financially for all she can get. She needs a good financial planner to invest whatever she can get from playing these games. JT should be smart enough to see what’s going on here.
Somewhere, a porn star is lying. Or lying (down).
“I retract the retraction of my earlier retraction.”
Modern Miner – laying down. 😉
Sir: you confuse me. If I meet up with my special lady friend tonight and play my cards right, am I going to get lyed, lied, layed, or laid?
Seriously:
* laying = placeing of something
* lying = reclining
Doh!
*placing
Modern Miner – I have no idea how things are going to with you and your special lady friend, however, it is going to cost you money regardless. I heard wine helps if you want to get lyed.
‘More importantly, Daniels is a liar no matter what account is true. She seems to relish the fact that truth means nothing to her or its implications for a matter of public importance.’
JT
This is the clearest evidence that she did spend a lot of time with Trump. Who better to teach her how to totally lie a subject into submission? She learned from the master himself. Add up the rest of the turnip’s history and he probably, allegedly, most likely, did. But, hey, those were back in the good ole locker room days. Things have changed. The turnip is no longer bedable. Code name for Melania around the White House-‘That Poor Woman’. The only thing that remains the same is the ability of the turnip to obfuscate through exaggerations and lies.
IB
The only thing Mr T is a master of is being repulsive.
Porn Stars, Virgins, Cousins and Family Friends?
“…the sort of thing that legitimate newspaper people don’t write about or don’t even make any implications about.”
___________________________________________________________________________________
“Once Upon A Secret”
How President Kennedy Seduced a 19 year-old White House Intern — Inside the Bedroom He Shared with Jackie
She was a wide-eyed White House intern just four days into the job when she found herself standing alone next to the most powerful man in the world — in the most intimate room within 1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Kathy Ehrich Dowd September 20, 2017 10:00 AM
She was a wide-eyed White House intern just four days into the job when she found herself standing alone next to the most powerful man in the world — in the most intimate room within 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Mimi Alford (née Beardsley) was all of 19 when she began working in the White House press office in 1962, and almost immediately caught the eye of President John F. Kennedy. While last year’s Jackie movie shed new light on how the first lady created the myth of Camelot after JFK’s assassination, much curiosity remains about their marriage and what Jackie knew.
As Alford details in her 2012 book, Once Upon a Secret, she was stunned when she received a call from Dave Powers, a close Kennedy aide known unofficially as the First Friend, who invited her for a swim in the White House pool. (It didn’t matter that she didn’t have a swim suit, there were plenty available to choose from.)
Bewildered after diving into the pool with two other young, female colleagues, Alford was nearly dumbstruck when the commander in chief himself walked in a short time later.
“Mind if I join you,” the president purred before heading into the dressing room, emerging a short time later in his swim trunks.
“He was remarkably fit — flat stomach, toned arms — for a forty-five year old man,” Alford writes, and details how the two exchanged pleasantries while treading water.
Later that same day, Alford was back at her desk when Powers called again, this time wondering if she would be interested in an informal get-together “upstairs.”
She accepted the invitation, and was stunned to discover that “upstairs” meant the family residence — and she soon found herself sipping daiquiris with an intimate group before the president entered the room.
A short time later Kennedy offered her a private tour of the residence, and it was when they were alone in the bedroom he shared with First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy that he made his move.
“This is a very private room,” Alford writes that he told her after slipping a hand on her shoulder.
“The next thing I knew he was standing in front of me, his face inches away,” she writes. “He placed both hands on my shoulders and guided me toward the edge of the bed.”
A short time later, Alford lost her virginity to the world-renowned leader, and their trysts continued for more than a year.
“I think he did take advantage — I was so young,” Alford told PEOPLE in 2012 of that first intimate encounter. “But I liked feeling special.”
Although Alford faced criticism for revealing so many personal details in the book — she also wrote that JFK asked her to give Powers, and later his brother Teddy, sexual favors (oral sex while JFK watched) — Alford told PEOPLE in 2012 she has no regrets.
“I couldn’t tell the story without those pieces,” she said. “I know there are some difficult parts to that book. And they were difficult for me to write … The fact is, I was vulnerable, and the president was a very powerful man.”
___________________________________________________________________________________
“…the sort of thing that legitimate newspaper people don’t write about or don’t even make any implications about.”
Wapo – Feb 2012
“In 2003, Dallek included a passing reference to a “tall, slender, beautiful nineteen-year-old college sophomore” in his acclaimed biography, “An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917–1963.” More details about the intern came via an oral history by Barbara Gamarekian, a former press aide to Kennedy. Mimi, she said, had a “sort of a special relationship with the president. . . the sort of thing that legitimate newspaper people don’t write about or don’t even make any implications about.” Alford kept the affair a secret, but confirmed it in 2003 after reporters tracked her down.”
___________________________________________________________________________________
“…President Bill Clinton was a guest on “Orgy Island” at least 26 times.”
MEDIUM – Estéban Trujillo de Gutiérrez
Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein’s “Orgy Island.”
“Then we come to the case of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Epstein owns an island in the US Virgin Islands known as Little Saint James, or by insiders, as “Orgy Island.”
Mr. Epstein was in the news because former President Bill Clinton was a guest on “Orgy Island” at least 26 times. Mr. Epstein was reported to procure girls as young as 12 years old to service visitors to the island. Not just for pleasure. Allegations that guests were vulnerable to blackmail after their interactions with underage girls were videotaped were frequent.
____________________________________________________________________________________
BIOGRAPHY
“FDR and His Women”
“… she was deeply wounded to discover that Franklin had been having an affair with her secretary, Lucy Mercer.”
Over the next decade and a half, Franklin rose in politics, while Eleanor struggled to balance demanding social obligations, a series of pregnancies and household duties. In 1918, she was deeply wounded to discover that Franklin had been having an affair with her secretary, Lucy Mercer. She offered Franklin a divorce. Whether Franklin wanted to accept Eleanor’s offer or not, Sara forbade it, threatening to cut off Franklin’s inheritance. Although the marriage continued, this moment was a turning point.
Marguerite ‘Missy’ LeHand In 1920, Marguerite “Missy” LeHand had come to work as Franklin’s secretary. Over the years, they developed a very close relationship, with Missy serving as one of Franklin’s main friends and confidantes. She lived in the White House during his presidency, and when she suffered a stroke, Franklin altered his will to include her. Eleanor and all the children were warm towards Missy and considered her one of the family. Franklin’s son Elliott later revealed that his father and Missy had had a long affair, and it seems likely that the family was aware at the time.
Due to the passage of time, the loss of documentary evidence, and conflicting stories from members of his circle, it’s hard to determine the exact nature of some of Franklin’s relationships. However, it is clear that he had a strong mother, a brilliant wife, and a circle of female friends and lovers who challenged and supported him throughout his life.
(excerpted)
Turley, not satisfied with merely being an ultracretinesque Leftist, is now a wanna-be Presstitute too. He may succeed in the latter by focusing on such irrelevant, salaceous stories as this one. I would encourage him to continue on that path. He should certainly avoid the important legal issues of the times because he has demonstrated a complete failure to even identify any logical arguments to support his Leftist positions.
And, of course, by all means, he must avoid all of the facts given in the President’s State of the Union speech because of the President obvious successes, in spite of the non-stop obstruction and interference from the Leftists.
So, to add to Turley’s new Leftist narrative, here’s a video that I’m sure that Turley and his ilk will enjoy viewing repeatedly. It’s an interview by a Video Presstitute of Turley’s favorite Video Prostitute.
Do you verbally attack everyone who offers you a valuable gift?
I’ve only stated facts. Can you name something I’ve said that is not factual and fully supportable?
No, you can’t. You may not like the facts, but that’s another story. So next time you whine about one of my posts, please say, “Do you always have to bring up facts?”
This brainless caricature of an ageing whore, who, as expected, appears to be far, far older than her reported chronological age of somewhere in her late 30’s, is, sadly and pathetically, attempting to milk her 15 minutes of fame. That’s it, folks. She’s desperate. Desperate for attention. Desperate for fame. Perhaps, desperate for money. Guess the porn industry has moved onto younger, hotter and not so haggard bimbos, and she misses the attention. The spotlight. The limelight. The cesspool of exposure to diseases. Tell me. . .what is the point of booking various talk shows and, then, when asked any assortment of questions, simply resorting to batting one’s eyes, giggling, saying something incoherent and jiggling, what could only be described as, a comically and grotesquely, over inflated chest? Let’s be honest here–she isn’t making the rounds to set the story straight; she’s making the talk show circuit to attempt to capture some morsel of attention. Last night, on Kimmel, I happened to catch her idiotic performance. Yes. Minutes of my life that I will never recapture. The bottom line. . .she answers no questions. She responds to nothing. She simply giggles and complains that people online are being cruel to her by claiming that she is really a man. Yeah. Right. Considering the long list of names with which this individual could be tagged, calling her, a man, is one of the most polite titles.
I can’t help but notice the irony when, in a time, when women attend award shows, dressed in black or wearing white roses, in, alleged, solidarity with those who have been sexuality exploited by those in power, that some unknown porn star is given so much attention. Yeah. I said it. Where is all the TIME IS UP crap and the #ME TOO garbage? This Stormy individual who, for a good portion of her life, allowed herself to be sexually exploited and debased, on camera, for fame and money. She bartered away her body, dignity, decency, soul and sexuality away in the same way that all of her sisters, in show business, did. I see no difference. No difference, whatsoever. In all cases, there was an exchange. An exchange of sex for parts in films. A trade-off. A trade-off that we all used to accept with a wink and a nod. While we are supposed to sympathize with those who needed to trade in sexual favors for movie roles, painting them as victims, those in the porn industry, so unworthy of any respect or humanity, are painted as sexually liberated, free spirits and not victims of sexual exploitation. An interesting double standard.
Well, the signatures do look different. At the same time, I think Stormy is playing the game for her tour. Once the tour is over she will disappear back to her regular job.
Where do I get my ‘Make America Horny Again’ Tour tickets?? This act could go on forever!
Is Madonna the Material Girl going to pop out of the woodwork? Diamonds are a girl’s best friend.
Happy Birthday Mr. Prez
(Madonna/Monroe parody)
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x190d5j
I’m glad that we have in hand documentation of the bank account records, money transfers, and many other pieces of concrete evidence which eliminate the need to rely on the word of a porn star to impugn the reputation of the holder of the highest elected official in the nation. Repeat “elected.” Does the will of the voters no longer mean anything in this country?
Are you saying that, because Trump got elected, he can do no wrong?
Who would spend one precious nanosecond trying to decipher if this upscale hooker is lying or not? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyp9fh-u4w8
Yeah, but. . .porn star.
Anyway, Stormy deserves an Irish Poem!
Para-Doxy???
An Irish Poem by Squeeky Fromm
There once was an porn star so bold,
She recanted the story that she told. . .
Then, she recanted that,
Sooo, who knows where she’s at???
Cause Stormy, she blows hot and cold!
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Da rumor is day T rump gave his Stormy another payment to say she lied. He wanted to get his wife dat was storming to come to da speech. She went and now Stormy can go back to tellin da truth. Stormy and T rump would not know da truth if it hit em over da head. Melania believes Stormy.
Another failure for the four letter word, bimbo brigade left. Since you really have nothing to offer but burnt eyes may I suggest you follow up on your repudiation nof citizenship and oath of office and…. just leave beore deportation becomes necessary.