Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe is under fire this week after referring to the selection of an African American for vice president over Sen. Elizabeth Warren as mere “cosmetics.” The comment set off a firestorm with critics calling the comment racist. I have strongly disagreed with Tribe’s legal positions and his rhetoric. However, I testified with Tribe during the Clinton impeachment and I have interacted with him for years. He is neither a racist nor dismissive of racial concerns. Tribe has spent his life fighting for his vision of a more perfect and equal union. People need to afford others a modicum of decency and consideration in such ill-considered commentary. Anyone who believes that Laurence Tribe is a racist is discarding decades of public interest work over a wayward comment.
Tribe interviewed with the Washington Post to support Sen. Elizabeth Warren after signing a letter with 100 others to former Vice President Joe Biden. He told the Washington Post that Biden should not yield to the demand to select an African American woman. (Biden previously declared that he would not consider men for the position). Tribe stated “I think African-Americans above all would be the first to say they are more interested in results than cosmetics.”
Former Pete Buttigieg staffer Rodericka Applewhaite, objected Tribe was engaging in racist speech. She declared Tribe “has no business speaking for Black people” and that dismissing calls for black leadership as “cosmetic” is racist.
Tribe quickly tried to quell the objections.
Laurence Tribe
✔@tribelaw
In urging @SenWarren as the strongest VP choice, I didn’t mean to express any doubt at all that several women of color currently on what’s said to be the Biden short list would be excellent choices as well. And (see next item in this thread)https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/warren-allies-send-letter-urging-biden-to-pick-her-as-running-mate/2020/06/15/4d453762-ae75-11ea-b1e7-33e88fa24c71_story.html …
Laurence Tribe
✔@tribelaw
when asked by the Post why Biden’s choice of a white woman wouldn’t automatically offend African Americans, I replied that I thought they “above all would be the first to say they are more interested in results than in cosmetics.” I apologize for my choice of words. See next item
Laurence Tribe
✔@tribelaw
I’ve never doubted that racial identity is a significant variable in American governance. It should count heavily in favor of previously excluded groups as part of a person’s full record of background, skills, and values. I’m FOR Warren, not ANTI-excellent others.
Notably, Tribe’s insistence that he is not “ANTI-excellent others” does not seem to include any male candidates who were categorically excluded by Biden. Biden’s promise not to consider any male candidate would violate federal law if he were the head of a corporation as opposed to the country.
Nevertheless, “cosmetics” aside, Tribe is no racist. Hopefully, he will be equally protective of other academics who have been recently declared racist for merely expressing their views on current events.
Tribe has been an unhinged TDS imbecile. He has shown himself to be an extreme bigot. Yes, he has free speech but he richly deserves to be hung on his own petard.
biden, the dem socialist candidate, is in fact telling all voters that he is willfully discriminating with his VP logic and likely selection. It’s not complicated; Review the dem party’s history of discrimination, to include their support for spending trillions on “social welfare” programs that have obliterated black individual responsibility, black individual accountability while asymmetrically increasing the black community to generational entitlement addictions
Illi edere sui- They eat their own
After all the unfair and defamatory remarks Laurence Tribe has leveled at others with whom he’s disagreed politically, your defense of Prof. Tribe makes about as much sense as your good words for Michael Avenatti, while he was still at large.
As for Tribe himself:
Per Wiki: The 1578 edition of the Directorium Inquisitorum (a standard Inquisitorial manual) spelled out the purpose of inquisitorial penalties: … quoniam punitio non refertur primo & per se in correctionem & bonum eius qui punitur, sed in bonum publicum ut alij terreantur, & a malis committendis avocentur (translation: “… for punishment does not take place primarily and per se for the correction and good of the person punished, but for the public good in order that others may become terrified and weaned away from the evils they would commit”).[13]