Scottish Man Convicted Of Calling Ex-Girlfriend’s Boyfriend A “Leprechaun”

170px-Leprechaun_ill_artlibre_jnlI have been a critic of the alarming criminalizing of speech in Great Britain through hate speech laws.  Such laws create an insatiable appetite for greater and greater speech regulation and create a sense of empowerment among citizens to silence those with whom they disagree.  Now, a Scottish man has been convicted of a message that was grossly offensive, indecent or menacing. According to the Evening Express, the prosecutor (appropriately named Susan Love) cited the fact that Terry Myers, 41, called the Irish boyfriend of his ex-girlfriend a “leprechaun.”


Love declared that the mail was threatening but added that it was a racially aggravated offense due to the use of the word “leprechaun.”

His defense attorney said that the two men had a “petty and pathetic” history and that his client regretted the use of the term.

He was nevertheless found guilty and fined £280 ($350) for the offense.

We have been following (here and here and here and and and here and and here and here) the worsening situation in England concerning free speech. The problem is trying to draw such lines rather than embracing free speech as protecting not just popular but unpopular and even hateful speech. Once you start as a government to criminalize speech, you end up on a slippery slope of censorship. What constitutes hate speech remains a highly subjective matter and we have seen a steady expansion of prohibited terms and words and gestures. As noted in a prior column, free speech appears to be dying in the West with the increasing criminalization of speech under discrimination, hate, and blasphemy laws.

As someone of Irish (and Italian) descent I would not be insulted to be called a leprechaun.  Indeed, being called a magical figure is a substantial improvement from the usual abuse that tends to follow more scatological than magical themes.

104 thoughts on “Scottish Man Convicted Of Calling Ex-Girlfriend’s Boyfriend A “Leprechaun””

  1. The appropriate cure for a sore loser calling his romantic rival a “leprechaun”, of course, would be for the court to suggest to the plaintiff that he respond in kind – with wit.

    “Leprechaun, am I? Are you saying I’m “magically delicious”? (Assuming General Mills sells their cereal “Lucky Charms” in Scotland with the same leprechaun mascot they use here in the US).

    Perhaps the defendant should feel lucky that his victim din’t respond in kind and call him a fairy. Since leprechauns belong to the Court of Faery, the romantic rival could claim that he was simply returning the insult in kind, not impugning the enraged Scotsman’s masculinity.

  2. America, and the entire western world need to bring back the ghost of George Carlin and Bill Hicks. Rip the left a new one so big it either allows for rational thought to seep in or it simply vaporizers them on the spot. I’d settle for the latter myself.

  3. Imagine what would have happened if he call him a “ginger leprechaun”

  4. He would have possibly had an affirmative defense if he claimed he actually was speaking in French…

    “lépreux con”

  5. dennis hanna — The first time was interesting and enough. This repeat was uncalled for.

  6. You got banned for lobbing volleys of curses at the moderator, Gainesville.

  7. The question I have is what this a reference to the ex-boyfriend’s ethnicity (hate speech) or extremely short stature. Is the guy 4′ tall? Then clearly no crime was committed.

      1. Perhaps she’s an unseelie? Or perhaps as a parting shot at the wrathful Scotsman, his ex-GF cast a glamour on him (making his penis intangible and invisible). They just don’t make glamour the way they used to.

Comments are closed.

Res ipsa loquitur – The thing itself speaks
%d bloggers like this: