Chicago Man Arrested For Spitting In The Coffee Of A Police Officer At Dunkin’ Donuts

Now consider the three charges in North Carolina: subjecting a law enforcement officer to bodily fluid, purposely tampering with a law enforcement officer’s drink and creating a hazardous environment.

I previously expressed surprise over the North Carolina charges. The Chicago charges are more predictable in these cases. We have seen the use of bodily fluids as a form of battery in attacks on police officers.

One question that I had was whether the battery would be elevated for aggravated battery under Section 5/12-2:

§ 12-2.  Aggravated assault.

(a) Offense based on location of conduct.  A person commits aggravated assault when he or she commits an assault against an individual who is on or about a public way, public property, a public place of accommodation or amusement, or a sports venue.

(b) Offense based on status of victim.  A person commits aggravated assault when, in committing an assault, he or she knows the individual assaulted to be any of the following:

(4.1) A peace officer, fireman, emergency management worker, or emergency medical services personnel:

(i) performing his or her official duties;

(ii) assaulted to prevent performance of his or her official duties;  or

(iii) assaulted in retaliation for performing his or her official duties.

The language appears mandatory but there is the key qualification of “performing his or her official duties.”  Is getting coffee while on duty part of his official duties?  The law appears directed as interference with a police activity so, as a criminal defense attorney, I would argue that it does not.

However, this case would seem an example of “retaliation for performing his or her official duties.”

Notably, the Chicago charges do not try to use the same COVID angle in North Carolina. In neither case was the person known to be COVID positive, but the prosecutors still used the pandemic as a foundation for the charges.  Even without COVID contamination, it could be argued that saliva carries other dangers but those would also seem to depend on the defendant’s health status.

What is interesting is also the comparison to product tampering laws.  These laws are designed to not only punish culprits who do things like post videos of licking ice cream in stores. It is also to product stores and businesses from the loss of sales from consumers who are concerned with the safety and purity of products. Such acts can devastate a manufacturer or even an industry.  Notably, in this case, the police said that they will no longer use Dunkin’ Donuts.  That is precisely the reaction that these laws seek to avoid.  However, these defendants allegedly committed these acts with the intent of that the contamination would not be public. Such acts are committed to secretly take joy from knowing that the officer drank contaminated coffee. That makes it different from many cases like the ice cream licking cases where the culprits post videos of the act.

In Illinois the tampering charge also would raise the foregoing question of the actual risk from saliva:

Sec. 12-4.5. Tampering with food, drugs or cosmetics.
(a) A person who knowingly puts any substance capable of causing death or great bodily harm to a human being into any food, drug or cosmetic offered for sale or consumption commits tampering with food, drugs or cosmetics.
(b) Sentence. Tampering with food, drugs or cosmetics is a Class 2 felony.
(Source: P.A. 96-1551, eff. 7-1-11.)

It is not clear if saliva in a hot cup of coffee present a “capacity” (rather than a threat) of “great bodily harm.”

The Chicago charges are, in my view, a better avenue to avoid such appellate issues.  In the end, these are all serious charges, as they should be.

60 thoughts on “Chicago Man Arrested For Spitting In The Coffee Of A Police Officer At Dunkin’ Donuts”

  1. One hopes that his attorney does not defend his client by saying that the spittle improved the flavor of the coffee.

  2. Riots and hate without a reason.

    Here’s some raw footage of secular saint George Floyd before and during the arrest and his ultimate drug-addled demise. Note his claim of not being able to breath BEFORE hitting the ground, his claim of claustrophobia despite being pulled from his car with windows pulled up, and his obvious accommodation of AC and rolled down windows by the cops when he claimed a panic attack and despite his resisting arrest. These aren’t the deeds of a hero nor his claimed murderers.

    I predict an acquittal for all the cops and more rioting unless we grow a backbone. “Truth is the beginning of every good to the gods, and of every good to man,” Plato said. Just like all bad things begin with a lie:

    1. Regrets, but my wager is that there will be two jurors who take an I-Say-It’s-Spinach posture. Keith Ellison has had this video for two months. ‘Minnesota Nice’ isn’t.

      1. TIA:

        “… but my wager is that there will be two jurors who take an I-Say-It’s-Spinach posture.”

        IME, it’s hard to ignore what is right before your eyes. Peer pressure ya know.

    2. One of the good citizens and voters the American Founders envisioned.

      Would anyone have heard of this arrest in China, Cuba, North Korea, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, etc.?

      “The things you think are precious, I can’t understand”

      – Steely Dan, 1972

      1. “You been tellin’ me you’re a genius since you were seventeen. In all the time I’ve known you, I still don’t know what you mean.” So good.

    3. mespo…….Thank you…..This is why we have to respect due process! Jeeze! We all knew what we were told was not the story!
      Sorry, “what we were told” ? Make that “what was crammed down our throats 24/7 with no room for dissent”.
      The entire country blown up because of a lie….two lies actually:
      1) George Floyd was murdered
      2) “Systemic racism”

      Democrats, you hate America. so please leave our country. But please leave it like you found it!

      1. I can’t tell you how many lawyers I’ve corrected to explain that it isn’t a murder until a jury says it is. Yeesh, where were these dunces during civics and con. law classes?

        1. mespo….exactly! I think I told you that Honest and his best buddy in law school studied at our house, instead of the library….and I was richer for it! I absolutely LOVED hearing them study aloud, and argue, discuss. It was like I was auditing Baylor Law, almost. I remember the day they came home and had learned about res ipsa loquitur, res gestae etc…..god i miss those days… constitutional law was my favorite…… And all of that to say you’re right about lawyers who don’t know con law. I’m just a housewife for pete’s sake! Other than Prof Turley, where are the bona fide Con Law attorneys in the Democrat Party that know anything?!
          Thank you again for that video!!

  3. Spitting in the cop’s drink could transmit Herpes, Hep B & C, mono, Covid-19, flu. Some of these are life threatening.

    I consider this an assault.

Comments are closed.

Res ipsa loquitur – The thing itself speaks