“A Political Problem”: New Mexico District Attorney Gives Probation To All Rioters

We previously discussed how prosecutors in North Carolina, Georgia, Oregon, and other states have dismissed or downgraded many rioting cases, including cases of individuals who destroyed statues in broad daylight.  Now, New Mexico District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies has announced that all of the individuals who destroyed a 152-year-old obelisk last October will be given “restorative justice” and no jail time. They will however be required to write a letter about their actions. Carmack-Altwies called the premeditated act of destruction of the obelisk a mere “political problem that got forced upon the criminal justice system.”

The statement of Carmack-Altwies is reminiscent of Speaker Nancy Pelosi shrugging off the destruction in her own home city of statues with “people will do what they do.”

The obelisk was erected in 1866 to honor Civil War-era soldiers who died in battle. The North-facing Panel #4 however read: “TO THE HEROES WHO HAVE FALLEN IN THE VARIOUS BATTLES WITH SAVAGE INDIANS IN THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO.”  The “savage” reference was removed in the 1970s. It was a National Landmark.

Police did not stop protesters as they attached ropes and pulled down the obelisk.

The seven defendants destroyed the obelisk in broad daylight and showed little concern for arrest or prosecution. It turns out they had reason to be so self-assured. They will be given six months to two years probation and perform 40 hours of community service. They will also be  required to write a letter admitting their role in toppling the obelisk.

The seven defendants were charged with felony counts of damaging property worth over $1,000.

I actually do not want to see these defendants given any serious jail time.  In that sense, I agree with Carmack-Altwies that any sentence should be large probationary.  However, my objection is the statement that this is just a “political problem.” Would Carmack-Altwies have taken such a view if the statue involved a different symbol or figure? The concern is that prosecutors identify with some of these protesters or their causes.  Short jail stints, even for a few months, can offer some deterrence and, more importantly, establish that this criminal conduct will not be tolerated.  Even without such jail time, it was important for Carmack-Altwies to establish the clear criminality of such actions. Instead, she dismissed the conduct as political rather than criminal.

There is an important national debate to have over such controversial public art. However, we are not having that debate. Mobs been allowed to dictate what public art will remain and what will be torn down. The message being sent is that you can skip any effort to try to convince other citizens to remove public art and just destroy such pieces unilaterally. The question is how Carmack-Altwies will punish the next wave of rioters for such destruction when she has already declared such premeditated acts as a “political problem that got forced upon the criminal justice system.”

67 thoughts on ““A Political Problem”: New Mexico District Attorney Gives Probation To All Rioters”

  1. Anyone remember the saying “those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it” Leave these statues standing and update the plaques in front of them to explain the times and the reason they were erected. That would be the lesson to show how things have changed for the better.

  2. what we are witnessing right now will someday be referred to by historians scholars and political scientists as “the end stage of the blue city/blue state governance model”
    it will be rightfully used as a cautionary tale for a future generation of politicians and public servants
    and uh oh probably sooner rather than later:

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/re-funding-police-major-cities-backtrack-police-budget-cuts-after-crime-surges

    hopefully someday somebody somewhere will go back and hold the democrat party to account for the thousands of black lives lost and billions of dollars of irreperable economic damage done to inner cities that came as the direct result of their fellow mostly white leftists losing their collective minds over a dozen or so dead black scumbags over the course of almost a decade that died only because they resisted arrest because other scumbag mostly white leftists told them the lie for years and years that all police hate all black people all the time

  3. “His family says they were told he died in a car wreck. Video now shows Ronald Greene was kicked, dragged and tased by police”

    By Jamiel Lynch and Ray Sanchez, CNN

    Updated 3:26 AM ET, Fri May 21, 2021

    https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/20/us/ronald-greene-video-louisiana-police-death/index.html

    Excerpt:

    The lawsuit said that an initial report from Glenwood Medical Center listed the principal cause of Greene’s death as cardiac arrest. He was also diagnosed with an “unspecified injury of head,” according to the lawsuit.

    Two officers involved in the incident were reprimanded for their actions that night two years ago, including not following procedures for body-worn cameras.

    AP reported last year that Union Parish Coroner Renee Smith said Greene’s death was ruled accidental and was attributed to cardiac arrest.

    One officer is on administrative leave in connection with a separate incident. Another officer received a 50-hour suspension, according to an LSP spokesperson.

    A third officer — who was heard in an audio recording last year describing beating “the ever-living f***” out of Greene — died in a single-vehicle crash in September.

    — CNN

    Too bad about that “third officer.”

    1. “Grisly video shows New Mexico cop’s shooting death during traffic stop”

      https://nypost.com/2021/04/11/new-mexico-cop-darrian-jarrotts-shooting-death-during-traffic-stop-video/

      During a peaceful exchange that lasts several minutes, the driver identifies himself as Omar Felix Cueva and admits he has a firearm in the vehicle, according to news reports.

      “You mind if I take it off you for my safety?” Jarrott is heard asking Cueva, according to footage published online.

      Jarrott, who was standing on the passenger’s side of the truck, then asks Cueva to follow him back to his squad car so he can run his name — when things turn deadly.

      Cueva steps out of the pickup holding an AR-15-style rifle and opens fire.

      “Oh s–t!” the cop is heard yelling before he falls to the ground.

      Cueva, 39, sped off, leaving Jarrott on the side of the road, and led New Mexico cops on a 40-mile high-speed chase — before he was killed in a shootout with police.

      —New York Post

      Too bad about that “Omar Felix Cueva”

Leave a Reply