There is a bizarre case out of the Michigan where Kevin VanLuven, 60, was convicted of aggravated indecent exposure. That itself is unfortunately not strange or rare. However, VanLuven was convicted of using a Tickle Me Elmo doll to masturbate while he was inspecting a residence for a potential purchaser. He was, however, acquitted of malicious destruction of property under $200. Both charges are misdemeanors.
We often discuss bizarre cases that push the limits of definitions under the criminal code. This is one such case.
The case began when homeowner Jaida Dodson remotely accessed her home security cameras to check on the progress of the inspection. She testified that she saw VanLuven remove a Tickle Me Elmo doll that had been among stuffed animals stored in a small teepee tent in the bedroom of Dodson’s two-year-old son and used it to pleasure himself.
The case involved an unsuccessful effort to suppress a confession of VanLuven after being confronted by officers. However, the two charges are interesting. I am assuming that the destruction of property was the Elmo doll and I would think that that would have been the easy charge. It is not like the parents are going to give the doll back to their son.
Here is a picture of the immediate victim:
However, the exposure charge is interesting. MCL 750.335b for aggravated indecent exposure involves cases where a person openly exposes their genitals, buttocks, or breasts in a public. The bedroom was clearly treated as a public space even though it was in a private home and there were no witnesses present. There was a camera that he clearly did not know about.
The main defense appears to be that VanLuven’s genitals were never exposed to the camera. That raises a good-faith challenge since the exposure of his genitals was never actually visible to the camera or onlookers and he was in a bedroom alone at the time. That makes it a rather novel case . . . beyond the obvious other novel elements.
However, the court ultimately rejected the defense challenge.
Judge Phyllis McMillen will sentence VanLuven on December 2 and he faces a maximum penalty of two years in prison and a $2000 fine.
11 thoughts on “Michigan Man Convicted After Using Tickle Me Elmo in an Indecent Fashion”
Is VanLuven any relation to McLovin?
He is wearing a mask so it is hard to make out the face, but I would know that forehead anywhere Congressman Gaetz.
Another example of a MAGA-loving conservative being cancelled.
Speaking of dolls….New video of Chucky doll chasing security guy on Capital Hill
Wait a minute! This man was by himself but was being spied on. That is NOT public! Granted, it’s gross but this case should have been thrown out when it was brought.
I would say that this might be seen as evidence of our cultural disintegration except for the fact that I am familiar with the works of Heironymus Bosch (1450-1516) and I would say that things are quite normal minus any form of regular administration of laws at this point that serves to embolden those with such proclivities.
So the judge ignores the law to get the outcome the judge desires?
I’m starting think Judges are like FBI agents. They are all corrupt.
Looks like he did more than just tickle Elmo.
Seems to me he choked him a bit.
“Michigan man caught pleasuring self with Elmo doll during home inspection”
Here, I fixed the headline….
Michigan man caught pleasuring self with Elmo doll during home erection.