The Django Syndrome: What the Latest Racist Attacks on Clarence Thomas Say About Our Rage Politics

In July 1991, Clarence Thomas, a relatively unknown D.C. Circuit judge, was nominated by President George H.W. Bush to replace Thurgood Marshall on the United States Supreme Court. Thomas soon found out that the only thing more perilous than replacing a historical icon on the Court is replacing a liberal with a conservative. Thomas would become an icon in his own right for conservatives: an unyielding defender of textualism and conservative jurisprudence. Yet, liberals seem more preoccupied by his race than his rigidity. This week, a leading Democrat, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison unleashed another openly racist attack on Thomas and neither the media nor the political establishment condemned the remarks.

Ellison condemned Thomas as a house slave working for white people, analogizing him to the vile character “Stephen,” played by Samuel L. Jackson in the film “Django Unchained.” (Jackson himself called Thomas “Uncle Clarence” after the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade). Ellison added that, because he disagreed with Thomas’ conservative opinions, the justice is “illegitimate” and “needs to be impeached.”

That is, of course, nonsensical from a constitutional standpoint. However, what was most striking is the response to statements. The racist attack from the top lawyer in the state of Minnesota was not condemned by a single democrat.

Not Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who previously falsely declared that hate speech is not constitutionally protected under the First Amendment and declared himself a champion against bigotry and racist rhetoric.

Not from senior Senator Amy Klubuchar, who has repeatedly denounced racist tropes and rhetoric of Republicans.

Not from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who rightfully condemned the comments of Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville on white nationalism but made no comment on a racist attack of Thomas in the same week.

Not from President Joe Biden, who has repeatedly denounced racial rhetoric and “codes” by Republicans.

Indeed, the day that Ellison’s comments were being aired nationally, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre went to the press room to denounce Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at length for his statements suggesting that Covid-19 may have been engineered to spare Jewish and Chinese people. Jean-Pierre declared that “it is important that we essentially speak out” when such racist or anti-Semitic comments are made, but then made no mention of the racist attack on Thomas as nothing more than a house slave.

Thomas knew that being a conservative black jurist would not be easy when he was nominated for the bench. Thomas replaced Robert Bork on the D.C. Circuit. Bork was also savagely attacked when he was nominated for the Court. Indeed, “borked” is now a term of art for destroying nominees in the confirmation process.

Thomas’ confirmation became a battle royale after Anita Hill accused him of of sexual harassment. What followed was famously described by Thomas as “a high tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas.”

The attacks on Thomas would never end. His very presence on the Court seemed to disgust liberals who made continual reference to his race. One Democratic legislator on the Georgia Senate floor called him an  “Uncle Tom” who “sold his soul to the slave master.”

The Smithsonian’s African American museum even skipped over Thomas in its selection of great African Americans at its opening despite being the second African-American appointed to the highest court. (His Senate confirmation-hearing accuser, Anita Hill, did make the cut.) It was only after a public outcry that the Smithsonian relented to include Thomas.

The media has been unrelenting in its hostile and one-sided coverage of Thomas. While running gushing pieces heralding the backgrounds of liberal justices, there has been a virtual news blackout on Thomas’ amazing life story, one of the truly most inspirational accounts of overcoming every possible obstacle in life.

Thomas was born on the Georgia coast in Pin Point, Georgia and grew up speaking Gullah, the creole dialect. He was raised in a one-room shack with dirt floors, no plumbing, and no Dad.  When he was eventually sent to a Catholic school, he had to learn to read and write in English. He overcame segregation and prejudice to eventually go to Holy Cross and then was offered admission to Yale, Harvard, and the University of Pennsylvania law schools. He would become the chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 1982, a federal appellate judge, and the second African American to join the Court.

Few of these critics could have walked the path of this man from Pin Point to Capitol Hill. He did so by being his own man — relying on his faith and his intellect to face seemingly insurmountable barriers before him.

Some 32 years ago, Thomas objected to the treatment of an “uppity black” jurist who thinks for himself. Others have made the case for him. For years, commentators have singled out Thomas for his race among the conservative majority. Now, in the face of yet another raw and racist attacks, the political and media establishment is again silent.

Ironically, the thing that made Stephen hate Django in the movie was that he would not yield to the demands of the white owners. Django defiantly admitted that he was “that one [black man] in ten thousand.” For the liberal establishment, Thomas was a threat because others might emulate him. That is why other black leaders like Sen. Tim Scott from South Carolina have faced continual racist tropes from the left, including a Maryland Delegate Gabriel Acevero stating that “Tim Scott isn’t naive, he’s cooning” to please white people.

The bitter irony is that Thomas is the antithesis of the Stephen character. He has always refused to yield to the demands of others on how he should think as a jurist due to his race.

The attacks are meant to chill others from even considering conservative or libertarian views. Ellison has long valued intimidation as a political weapon. He previously praised the ultra-violent group Antifa as useful to “strike fear in the heart” of Trump and Republicans.

Of course, Django is all about righteous rage as a license for the most extreme actions.

That is why Ellison may have had the right movie, but the wrong character. Call it the Django syndrome. When you are “one in ten thousand” who refuses to yield, you become not simply an annoyance but an obsession.

This column appeared in Fox.com

189 thoughts on “The Django Syndrome: What the Latest Racist Attacks on Clarence Thomas Say About Our Rage Politics”

  1. Funny that Ellison has nothing to say about the corruption in Sotomayor’s backyard. Having her staff act as sales managers for her own books and force-feeding them to schools sounds a lot like an ethical violation.

  2. Anonymous the stupid is on the prowl today. I would urge the readers to steer clear otherwise they will be stepping on the same rakes he steps on and falls on every day. Better to just walk around the bodies on the ground and press on.

    1. That’s sound advice GEB. Unfortunately that reminder needs to be written everyday. Perhaps Professor Turley would consider moving the following paragraph from his Civility Rule page and inserting in boldface at the end of every post.

      Like all sites, we attract trolls and juvenile posters who want to tear down the work of others. It is a sad reality of the Internet and the worst element of our species. Don’t feed the trolls. Ignore them. They are trolls and live under cyber bridges for a reason.

  3. Georgia former Democrat now Republican Mesha Mainor, recently said, “The most dangerous thing to the Democrat Party is a black person with a mind of their own.”
    Well said, Miss Mainor, well said.

    1. After she switched parties, she began tweeting some of the absolutely vile, hateful, racist disgusting messages she’s received from Democrat voters after she switched parties. I have never had a Twitter account so I can’t read her tweets. But a site called Twitchy selects certain tweets to amplify and promote and they’ve highlighted some of her tweets.

      It would literally be an INTERNATIONAL news story if a black Democrat were getting called the nasty hateful racist names she’s being called by Democrats. But since she’s now a Republican and it is Democrat voters engaging in the racism, it’s radio silence from the MSM.

      1. Read about that too.
        Seems the Democrat party is reaching deep down to its old KKK roots.

  4. I was able to watch in 1992 when Justice Thomas was pilloried by the US Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Joe Biden. I was so proud of Justice Thomas for his unwavering strength and was introduced, for the first time, to Joe Biden. I was totally unimpressed. It was, in a way, funny how Joe stumbled all over himself when Justice Thomas compared the inquiry to a High Tech Lynching and expressed righteous anger. It was watching an incompetent idiot wilting under the glare of a righteous man who showed steel in his character while the chairman did his best impersonation of a rubber man.
    Justice Thomas and I share the same state as a birthplace and he was born 2 months before me. My circumstances were not as severe as Justice Thomas but we were certainly not privileged except we were alive and living with my grandparents. My father was overseas.
    When I Moved north at 31 after my fellowship, I was surprised when I met the so-called white northern liberals. I am white. Since I carried no accent I was assumed to be a part of “them”. They were as blatantly racist and anti-Semitic as any voices I heard in the South, if not even worse. I suspected as much but it was still a shock to see it confirmed.
    To my mind conservatives and southerners have become far more egalitarian over the decades even as the progressives and large groups of liberals have gone racist. Mostly what I heard in the past was whispered and rarely screamed publicly unless the Klan was marching or other like minded groups.
    Now liberal-progressives scream some of the most vile racist and anti-Semitic tropes that 30-40 years ago would have made the KKK Grand Wizards proud. And the news media says not a word and urges them on.
    MLK Jr would weep.

    1. A black man is accused of making sexual remarks to an educated and attractive black woman about a pubic hair on a Coke can. So when her testimony about this incident was elicited, somehow, this became a “high tech lynching”. This told me that Thomas isn’t very bright, was very hungry for the power and prestige of the SCOTUS, and would do a lousy job if he got onto the bench. I was right.

      1. Gigi, if you knew what you were talking about one might want to correct your impressions, but everyone that is knowledgeable realizes your brain was fried years ago.

    2. Thanks to the Democrats, in 2019, there were over 4.15 million Black single mothers, an increase of 22% in 20 years. Over 50% of Black children live in a single-parent family, which means an impoverished family without a father to model male virtues to the boys and to protect the girls from predatory males. You’d be hard pressed to find a stable, two-parent home in the rogues’ gallery of BLM

  5. @Anonymous
    “Ellison was making an accurate comparison that black people can make.” So racist actions and comments can be appropriate under certain circumstances? How Sorosian of you!

    And you make the comments “Turley conveniently leaves that out….Thomas’s appearance of being a bought and paid for Supreme Court Justice” and “the growing ethics scandal surrounding Thomas” while at the same time totally ignoring Sotomayor’s extortion racket and the use of government employees to seemingly ‘aid and abet’ in such affairs? If you are truly concerned with judicial impropriety then give the readers a balanced view of the problem and the seemingly most severe infractions

    Your colors are revealed.

  6. Minnesotans have always been a timid, guilt-ridden group. That is precisely why Keith Ellison is camped out there so as to take advantage of that situation. Should he move anywhere else his stale views from the Obama dynasty and beyond would be lost in the crowd.

    No person should be repeatedly subjected to such banal attacks as Judge Thomas has seen over the years. In fact, these attacks from the same charlatans are so predictable that one can presume that they have no other basis for such attacks in either law or common sense; they are left with only adolescent attempts to insult and ridicule. Undoubtedly, Judge Thomas realizes the situation.

    1. “Turley’s depiction of the opposition to Thomas is simplistic . . .”

      Your smear notwithstanding, it’s a pretty simple issue:

      Either some of those attacks are racist or they’re not.

      1. Sam, I wrote a piece which wasn’t a smear and had nothing to do with criticizing his values except noting how much they’ve changed. Point to anything I said that was a racist attack?

        1. “Simplistic” is a smear.

          “Point to anything I said that was a racist attack?”

          Nice try.

            1. “So you couldn’t point to anything.”

              To nothing *you* said, because I don’t care what you say.

              As for those who do matter, see Ellison and his ilk.

              Either learn to read or develop some intellectual honesty. Maybe both.

        2. Enigma, I take it that Justice Thomas by this point in time has had life experiences that have shaped him into the man he is today.

    2. You can ask Thomas Sowell as well. He was a communist. His PhD was on Marxism which is something he believed.

      What do both of these brilliant black minds have in common. Both started life in horrid circumstances and reacted to them with dangerous beliefs. Both became learned and realized that the opposite of what they thought was true.

      In Thomas Sowell’s case, he started working the numbers based on the assumptions of the day. He found those numbers inaccurate and has published over three-dozen books mostly on economics using raw numbers showing how the left’s claims are wrong.

      Why don’t people from the left debate him? Because they know he will destroy their ideas and show them false. Many of Enigma’s statements are based on these false ideas but he won’t read one of Sowell’s books to get the opposite side of the story.

      Enigma, you talk about red-lining. Sowell wrote a book on that demonstrating the truth. The reason the left won’t believe what he wrote is because they think mathematics and likely statistics are racist.

      1. Good comment SM. Imagine the revenue that would be generated if Thomas Sowell or Clarence Thomas did a pay-per-view debate regarding the subject of racism in America, with that renowned Marxist philosopher, Ibram X. Kendi. 🤑

    3. I read the article and don’t believe almost any of it.
      It’s one big fat second hand talking points smear.
      When two apparent actual quotes from Clarence are printed in italics, they roundly bash the demoncrats corruption.

      I then checked the authors page, his listed articles – it’s one racist diatribe after another – one race card rant after another. It’s worthless crap for worthless minds.

      1. Most of the information comes from Clarence’s autobiography. If you choose not to believe it, take it up with him. Out of curiousity, what don’t you believe?

        1. “Most of the information comes from Clarence’s autobiography. “

          I believe that, but the spin comes from YOU! You say, “persecuted by his grandfather.” What does that mean? The Jews were persecuted by Hitler. Is that the persecution you are thinking about? He wasn’t persecuted by his grandfather at all. His grandfather was stern, but in the end, Thomas credits him for his success. One of Thomas’s great regrets was he didn’t get to tell his grandfather that his grandfather was right.

          Is that what you call coming from the autobiography? That is a lie. That is reprehensible, and what you do to all people who espouse an ideology you disagree with. It makes further reading of what you wrote a waste of time. Your blog is your desire to change history by defaming instead of being truthful.

          1. Good point I noticed the line that the Grandfather beat the living daylights out of him in an abusive way….
            Then next I see the whatever quote with Clarence claiming he was the greatest thing ever.
            It’s a big pile of that. Spinning lies and crap.
            I also don’t believe the endless prattle about poor downtrodden blah blah blah, next thing you know they are in Harvard and how many decades ago was that.
            The liars in our society do this all the time.
            Wikipedia has an uncontrollable urge to do it nearly 100% of the time. The owners of the society love it – the fairy tale crap.
            Nearly every person of note was either a poor oppressed loser who had no chance (total lies) or some offspring of a wealthy industrialist or they play stupid then you see the life progression story makes no sense is totally unbelievable and hidden hand is no doubt the real truth.

  7. Skin color and politics.

    That’s how the left judges the content of every ones character.

    AGAIN, running from a dialogue of substance. Ellison vs Thomas? You we all know what that would look like. That’s why Ellison, a man of deep legal and constitutional knowledge, is forced into ad hominem attacks. He cant defend his opening statement in a debate against Thomas. Thomas has proven himself to be a giant in Constitutional Law.

  8. “[Ellison] praised the ultra-violent group Antifa as useful to ‘strike fear in the heart’ of Trump and Republicans.” (JT)

    As if we needed more evidence that Antifa is the Left’s Brownshirts.

  9. “Ellison condemned Thomas as a house slave working for white people . . .”

    So if a black person disagrees with the Left, he is betraying his race.

    That vile ideology sounds ominously familiar.

  10. A great documentary giving insight into Justice Thomas’s thinking and his childhood, is Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in his Own Words. It’s available on Amazon Prime. One insight is how he in his radical anger was changed into the calm conservative thought through working for John Danforth, then Attorney General of Missouri (later US Senator from Missouri and Thomas’s sponsor in the nomination and confirmation process). That job opened Thomas’s eyes to some real-world truths especially in the area of crime.

    https://www.amazon.com/Created-Equal-Clarence-Thomas-Words/dp/B08HFYY3FL

  11. Wasn’t Keith Ellison accused of abusing his girlfriend in a Boston hotel? If I remember correctly it was a serious accusation and it was very credible. Of course it is (D)ifferent theh further to the left that your politics land.

    So we have an ATIFA loving, woman abusing, radical left winger attacking a black man who has risen from poverty to be a great Justice on the Supreme Court. Ah, ok. Just more news from Doublestandardstan.

  12. Condoleezza Rice, Clarence Thomas, Tim Scott, Thomas Sowell, Walter E. Williams, even Sammy Davis Jr. and Jackie Robinson when they veered towards conservatives … Dr. Martin Luther King when he spoke out against the Vietnam War …. more and more who we never know … Being Black, part of a minority demographic, and still addressing forbidden topics from unapproved perspectives takes remarkable courage, integrity and fortitude. They must navigate vile waters. They must battle soulless monsters disguised as righteous advocates, lurking in the mud, waiting to devour them and any who follow in their wake. Whether I agree on every opinion or not, they are an inspiration.

    1. Clay, Heree’s what Jackie Robinson had to say after attending the 1964 Republican National Convention as a delegate:

      “I wasn’t altogether caught off guard by the victory of the reactionary forces in the Republican party, but I was appalled by the tactics they used to stifle their liberal opposition. I was a special delegate to the convention through an arrangement made by the Rockefeller office. That convention was one of the most unforgettable and frightening experiences of my life. The hatred I saw was unique to me because it was hatred directed against a white man. It embodied a revulsion for all he stood for, including his enlightened attitude toward black people.

      A new breed of Republicans had taken over the GOP. As I watched this steamroller operation in San Francisco, I had a better understanding of how it must have felt to be a Jew in Hitler’s Germany.

      The same high-handed methods had been there.

      The same belief in the superiority of one religious or racial group over another was here. Liberals who fought so hard and so vainly were afraid not only of what would happen to the GOP but of what would happen to America. The Goldwaterites were afraid — afraid not to hew strictly to the line they had been spoon-fed, afraid to listen to logic and reason if it was not in their script.

      I will never forget the fantastic scene of Governor Rockefeller’s ordeal as he endured what must have been three minutes of hysterical abuse and booing which interrupted his fighting statement which the convention managers had managed to delay until the wee hours of the morning. Since the telecast was coming from the West Coast, that meant that many people in other sections of the country, because of the time differential, would be in their beds. I don’t think he has ever stood taller than that night when he refused to be silenced until he had had his say.

      It was a terrible hour for the relatively few black delegates who were present. Distinguished in their communities, identified with the cause of Republicanism, an extremely unpopular cause among blacks, they had been served notice that the party they had fought for considered them just another bunch of “ni**ers”. They had no real standing in the convention, no clout. They were unimportant and ignored. One bigot from one of the Deep South states actually threw acid on a black delegate’s suit jacket and burned it. Another one, from the Alabama delegation where I was standing at the time of the Rockefeller speech, turned on me menacingly while I was shouting “C’mon Rocky” as the governor stood his ground. He started up in his seat as if to come after me. His wife grabbed his arm and pulled him back.

      “Turn him loose, lady, turn him loose,” I shouted.

      I was ready for him. I wanted him badly, but luckily for him he obeyed his wife…” — Jackie Robinson

      1. What Jackie Robinson would say about today’s Democrat Party.

        Whatever I saw at the GOP convention that was bad pales to the way Democrats act today. Character over color is the way, not color over character which is today’s Democrat mantra. He would add that the witch-hunts by Democrats today is far worse than the committee he testified before. He would then bow his head to the almighty in shame for Democrat anti-Semitism and Democrat distaste for religious institutions.

          1. Thank you. Robinson is dead so he can’t respond to your garbage. I believe my response would be close to his. I am glad you agree.

              1. Though you don’t recognize it, time and place is important. What you said was said by Robinson in another time and place. I probably agree with most of what he said, but we need to compare things for what they are. (You need to improve your reading skills.)

                I provided what, IMO, he would probably say today. If you have something better, say it, and be prepared to defend your remarks.

                  1. I take note that you don’t consider the things Robinson cared about. That is how one can predict what he would say today, and today Robinson would say you are full of cr-p.

      2. So let me get this straight… some racist minded black guy is at the repub convention in 1964, and he’s telling this story whining his racist butt off, he claims he’s STANDING UP and YELLING LOUDLY – obviously into the ear of the guy and his wife sitting right in front of him… the guy gets pissed because his eardrums are breaking, gives the loud mouthed ranting black guy a dirty look and goes to stand up to shut him up, but his wife grabs his arm – then the raging loud mouthed in a fit black jerk SCREAMS in the wifes face let him go let him go – because he could barely contain his urge to start beating on someone he was already abusing with his big fat mouth screaming into the guy and his wifes sitting ears.

        HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAA WHAT A JERK ! A TOTAL RAGING HATE FILLED LOUD MOUTHED JERK !

    2. That describes the entire conservative and republican and non woke majority of the USA right now.
      I’m not giving any credit because someone’s skin color does or doesn’t fit someone else’s whining narrative.
      The entire focus is incorrect, we the people should be hearing the judicial arguments and the reasons and then have that associated with justices.
      Instead we get an endless pile of crap or adoration.

  13. I can tell you as a “non-woke” independent thinking Hispanic, if I encounter hostility due to my views, it is almost ALWAYS from leftist Anglo Whites. They usually assume I possess a leftist view on immigration or cultural issues and when I don’t, they are surprised, offended and take it personally. What is it with leftist Whites having a “savior complex”? Now that doesn’t mean these “saviors” are actually going to help me in some meaningful way, it’s a virtue signal to show “I’m a good person”.

    antonio

    1. Ellison and his ilk no matter skin color are now the majority of democrats. Even many republicans I.e. RINO’s have effectively joined the big spending democrats, just look at that raising the debt limit bill. I like professor TURLEY but until lifelong democrats stop voting for them because they can’t vote for conservatives, nothing will change.

    2. @antonio

      I actually refer to them as ‘Great White Saviors’ because that is what they are in their minds, and that is how ludicrous it is. There is a reason black face was so common among leftist elites; it’s the only way to get black folks into the mx when one doesn’t actually know any beyond servitude. Other cultures are merely a concept to these fools, at worst, pets, or at best, human but inherently ignorant. What a great irony that is. 🙄

      1. James,
        ‘Great White Saviors’ is about right.
        A few years ago, Oakland CA residents were having a PRO-police rally, as the BLM/defund the police movement made their neighborhood more dangerous.
        Then, a bunch of white soy boy antifa showed up to counter protest. To say the least, they were NOT from the neighborhood or zip code or socio-economic class.
        The residents were not happy with them, and the police had to step in to protect the soy boys.

  14. Is there anything liberals hate more than a black conservative?

    1. @kristin oren

      In fairness, what I experience as a dissident thinking Hispanic is nowhere near what Blacks like Thomas encounter. I know several; they are independent, brave, and self reliant people. They have my respect.

      antonio

    2. @Kristin:

      Probably not. Democrats understand they need a near monopoly of around 90% of the black vote to be competitive. If even 30-40% of blacks ever decide to vote Republican, and the rest of the Democrat coalition remains static, it will be nearly impossible for Democrats to win majorities in the House, Senate, presidential races, and many state and local elections.

      Democrats correctly perceive black conservatives are the biggest threat to their power. Because if black conservatives like Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Larry Elder, the late Walter Williams, Shelby Steele, Glenn Loury, and others can persuade blacks to see things clearly and rationally like they do, then it is a huge threat to Democrat power.

      That’s why Democrats shamelessly lie that Republican led efforts to enact voter ID laws are meant to suppress black voters. Democrats and their friends in academia and media want to create that false impression in the minds of blacks to stoke hatred against Republicans and keep them loyal Democrats.

      It’s always and only ever about power for Democrats. They correctly view black conservatives as the biggest threat to their power, so much of their lies, vitriol, and hatred is directed at them.

      1. I would add Democrats are against school choice to keep blacks ignorant and from having “. . . a mind of their own.”

        1. “Democrats are against school choice . . .”

          That is one of their most vile, destructive policies.

          They criticize the lack of education opportunities for blacks. Then they tell a black parent: We’re against you seeking those opportunities.

          The obvious implication is: You, black parent, can’t know what’s best for your children. We’ll decide. You kneel and obey. If that’s *not* a “plantation mentality,” I don’t know what is.

          If I were a black parent, that alone would cause me to jump ship.

  15. Keith is simply projecting. Being a black muslim spokesman for Chicago liberal jews must take its toll.

  16. When Keith Ellison calls Justice Thomas a ‘house slave working for white people’, maybe he should look in the mirror.

  17. For the liberal establishment, Thomas was a threat because others might emulate him.

    Threat.

    Fear

    Fear of what? Fear is binary. Fear of losing something you have, or Fear of not getting something you ‘think’, you deserve.

    The illiberals fear the loss of power. Clarence Thomas proves systemic racism is a fake talking point. Black with less than nothing, can, succeed. It starts with family, church, consistent work ethic. It is not a complicated process. It may not be easy. The steps are simple.

  18. Maybe George Washington has it right. When political parties divide us, the party system itself might be what tears America apart.

    1. Exactly. When either party is willing to accept and do anything to win, the country suffers. I’ve pointed that out to many Dems, but they just don’t get it. To them Trump and Republicans are so bad, that ANYTHING is okay to do to defeat them. That’s why they are never upset about being lied to, especially regarding Trump. Perfect example being the Russia hoax. For four years they were told a lie and they aren’t mad. In fact, they are just glad that it worked.

  19. “Django is all about righteous rage as a license for the most extreme actions.”

    Well, that and the obvious anti-white propaganda that has taken over this country.

Comments are closed.