Over the last two years, ethicists and public interest groups have raised concerns over the selling of art by Hunter Biden as an avenue for Biden donors and allies to funnel money to the family. In response, then White House Press Secretary (and now MSNBC host) Jen Psaki repeatedly assured the public that there was a special ethical plan in place with the gallery to prevent Hunter from knowing who purchased the art. Yet, according to Georges Bergès, Hunter Biden’s art gallerist, he never spoke to anyone with the White House. Not only did he confirm that the White House never contacted him, but said that Hunter knew who purchased roughly 70% of the value of his art, including Democrat donors Kevin Morris and Elizabeth Hirsh Naftali.
The media dutifully reported at the time how the White House was grappling with the ethical questions and, according to the Washington Post, “the White House officials have helped craft an agreement.”
That appears to be news to Bergès who said that he had no contacts with the White House and Hunter knew the identity of the purchasers of most of the art. Notably, Bergès was reading these same reports in the news but never objected to the alleged misrepresentation. He simply continued to be a conduit for the funds to Hunter.
In the meantime, the White House continued to swat down questions by citing an ethical plan created for the sales. Andrew Bates, a spokesperson for the White House, said in a statement that “the President has established the highest ethical standards of any administration in American history, and his family’s commitment to rigorous processes like this is a prime example.”
Psaki stated:
“Well, I can tell you that after careful consideration, a system has been established that allows for Hunter Biden to work in his profession within reasonable safeguards […] But all interactions regarding the selling of art and the setting of prices will be handled by a professional gallerist, adhering to the highest industry standards. And any offer out of the normal course would be rejected out of hand. And the gallerist will not share information about buyers or prospective buyers, including their identities, with Hunter Biden or the administration, which provides quite a level of protection and transparency.”
The White House can now explain how it implemented this ethical plan without involving the gallery controlling the information and sales.
Some other details are concerning. Bergès admitted that Hunter knew that Naftali was one of the purchasers. However, he also reportedly admitted that he pushed Naftali to buy some of the pieces in 2020 without success. However, two months after Joe Biden became president, Naftali purchased her first piece of Hunter Biden’s artwork and later, in July 2022, President Biden announced Naftali’s appointment to the Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad.
Likewise, Bergès admitted that most of the art was actually purchased by lawyer Kevin Morris, who has reportedly given Hunter millions to cover unpaid taxes and expenses. So, as media was reporting how Hunter’s art was being eagerly purchased by art lovers, it appears to have been an illusion. It was Morris, and he only paid Bergès’ 40% commission on the $875,000 purchases.
Bergès admits that he has never seen a deal where the purchaser just paid his commission.
The strange arrangement reenforces the view that this was all a sham from the alleged ethics plan to the purchases themselves. Morris, a major Democratic donor, had only briefly met Hunter when he started to pay off his debts and support his lavish lifestyle.
The art sales were portrayed as a way for Hunter to support himself in a new (and successful) emergence as an artist. The Independent gushed how buyers were “floored” by Hunter’s talent and eagerly flocked to the shows.
However, it was largely Morris according to Bergès. So Hunter sent the art to New York and the press played up his success as an artist. Morris then bought most of the art and just paid Bergès his fee. The public was then left with the impression that Hunter was not only a successful artist, but supporting himself.
I am rather surprised that Joe Biden would so blatantly lie about the arrangement to keep the “art” transactions secret from Hunter when the truth would be so easily discovered. It comes off as a veritable thumbing of the nose at the American public – not a good look regardless.
He knew there were pictures of hime with hunters business partners when he made claims he’d never met them.
You are surprised?
WAS THIS EGREGIOUS BIDEN PERVERSION AND CORRUPTION THE DESIGN AND INTENT OF THE AMERICAN FOUNDERS?
NO! A GOOD, RESPONSIBLE, AND DECENT COUNTRY COMES FROM GOOD, RESPONSIBLE, AND DECENT VOTERS.
THIS IS THE RESULT OF THE DILUTION, CORRUPTION, AND EXPANSION OF THE VOTE IN THE AMERICAN RESTRICTED-VOTE REPUBLIC.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“Hunter Biden’s Daughters First Discovered His Affair With Brother’s Widow, Ex-Wife Kathleen Buhle Writes in New Memoir”
“Anger is such a heavy weight to carry and I was in a lot of pain. There was a lot that happened that was very hard for me. And when I made the decision to divorce, I wanted to let go of all of that.”
In her upcoming book, If We Break: A Memoir of Marriage, Addiction, and Healing, out June 14, Kathleen Buhle describes how she found out that her then husband, the president’s son Hunter Biden, was having an affair with his late brother Beau’s widow, Hallie. Per an excerpt published by People, Buhle and Biden’s daughter Finnegan called Buhle to the home of the family’s therapist, Debbie, whom Buhle had enlisted to help her children process their uncle’s fight with brain cancer and their father’s drinking.
“‘Debbie,’ Finny said once we had Naomi [their eldest] on speakerphone, ‘can you tell her? We can’t do it,’” she writes. “Debbie looked me in the eye and calmly said, ‘Kathleen, Hunter’s having an affair with Hallie.’”
When Buhle asked how they knew, Finnegan said, “We found his phone,” and Naomi added, “There were text messages between them.” They had already called Biden to let him know that they had seen the texts, the therapist told Buhle, adding, “From now on, Kathleen, no more secrets. I told the girls that from this day forward, you will tell them the whole truth.”
The 53-year-old D.C. nonprofit executive was married to Biden for 24 years before they divorced in 2017. Her memoir tells the story of their marriage and how it declined under the weight of Biden’s many addictions, the financial difficulties those addictions worsened, and, eventually, the affair with his sister-in-law after his brother passed from brain cancer. She told People, “I have forgiven him, yes. Anger is such a heavy weight to carry and I was in a lot of pain. There was a lot that happened that was very hard for me. And when I made the decision to divorce, I wanted to let go of all of that.”
– Vanity Fair
Comment of the week:
“You are the epitome of white privilege. Coming in to the Oversight Committee, spitting in our face, ignoring a congressional subpoena to be deposed. What are you afraid of? You have no balls to come up here,” she said.
“I think that Hunter Biden should be arrested right here, right now, and go straight to jail,”.
– Rep. Nancy Mace to Hunter Biden, to which Hunter quickly got up and ran out like a coward
🤣🤣
Tom/Estovir
The video clearly shows that Hunter remains seated and silent as Nancy Mace addresses him. Maybe you can find a video where Hunter jumps up and runs. But I don’t think you’ll locate one.
I’ll be glad to shove it in your face, turdrunner, lawn boy.
Fyi, it happens as soon as Ms Green begins to speak.
Looking like a little kunt, just like you.
Turdrunner/ lawn boy
He doesnt remain silent, since you seem so interested in strict details all of a sudden. He speaks to abbe lowell several times
So eat sh*t with your nonsense
Not sure how it was that Rep Mace was so prepared (looked like she had a written statement to work from), but I enjoyed the hell out of watching her rip Hunter a new one. Bravo. Saved that video.
Hunter’s Surprise Appearance:
Jim Jordan’s Defied Subpoena Recalled
Jamie Raskin, the Democratic vice-chair of the committee, hit back by reminding Republicans that Hunter Biden had offered to testify at a public hearing. Raskin also noted that some Republican lawmakers, including House judiciary committee chair Jim Jordan, had defied subpoenas issued by the House select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the Capitol.
“We are here today because the chairman has bizarrely decided to obstruct his own investigation and is now seeking to hold Hunter Biden in contempt after he accepted the chairman’s multiple public offers to come answer the committee’s questions under oath before the American people,” Raskin said.
The hearing quickly descended into chaos as Nancy Mace, a Republican of South Carolina, attacked Hunter Biden as “the epitome of white privilege”.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/10/hunter-biden-contempt-congress-republicans
…………………………………
House Republicans have yet to address Representative Jim Jordan’s defied subpoena regarding the January 6th Committee. That defiance, we must glean, was simply old Jim ignoring a ‘politically-charged’ investigation. But their investigation, against Hunter Biden, has ‘nothing to do with politics’.
The House never voted to forward Jordon to DoJ. Issuing a congressional Subpeona to sitting members is problematic. Not even sure if the DoJ has the power to get involved.
All of the whataboutism is meaningless. Hunter told the House FO. Regardless of the public comments/offers, the only thing that counts is the legally filed paperwork. Hunter violated the subpoena
Nope I think the house did vote to refer to DoJ. DoJ wanted nothing to do with it. Even they were smart enough to see a flurry of House members getting subpoenaed by the party in power.
VIDEO: Hunter Shows Up At House Hearing To Say: “Here I Am”
Rep. Nancy Mace tells Hunter Biden he is “the epitome of white privilege” for showing up at the hearing after ignoring the Oversight Committee’s subpoena to give a closed-door deposition, saying he should be arrested and thrown in jail.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5101219/rep-mace-calls-hunter-biden-the-epitome-white-privilege-ignoring-congressional-subpoena
…………………………………..
Why is it that House Republicans can only question Hunter in CLOSED hearings? Either they have a case against him or they don’t.
Anonymous, EVERY Republican was first deposed in closed sessions…and you know it. Do you always lie or do you just lie at the behest of your paymasters?
Want to go back to your glory days of Adam Schiff? Schiff wouldn’t hold any public sessions and he wouldn’t even allow Republicans equal time in the closed sessions.
Now when Hunter is found in contempt will the DC DA charge him as he charged Bannon and Peter Navarro or will we see the continuation of life in Doublestandardstan?
Schiff allowed public sessions and made himself widely seen.
Vincent van Gough only ever sold one painting before he committed suicide and that was to a relative.
Your argument is based on the assumption that (a) circuit courts need to be “looked after,” and (b) each Justice only has capacity to oversee one such court. These assumptions are not self-evident; on what basis do you believe them to be true?
Also . . . you didn’t answer: what if Congress splits a circuit into two: does the number of Justices automatically go up?
Kansas Elder: The USA has a much larger population than when the number of justices was set at 9. With a larger court various cases now turned down could come before a panel of 3 justices. Egregiously, currently there are decisions spilt between circuits so that federal law differs across circuits.
But now, the number of justices is set by Congress. They ought to increase the number according to need.
Egregiously, currently there are decisions spilt between circuits so that federal law differs across circuits.
That is one of the main reasons they grant cert.
But now, the number of justices is set by Congress.
“But now”? Hasn’t it always been?
With a larger court various cases now turned down could come before a panel of 3 justices.
Now I see what is driving this: you think Scotus should sit in panels of 3 instead of all Justices on each case. That is a far more radical proposal than a simple increase in the number of Justices.
So, originally, you justified the increase on the basis of each Justice overseeing one circuit. But having the court sit in panels of three? I’m not sure Congress can mandate that. Wouldn’t that be up to the Court to decide? What would give Congress the power to require that?
Kansas Elder, it would be up to the court. My main point is that now insufficient justice is being done as the nation has a much large population, hence need.
I suppose Congress could require it. The constitution gives all power over the federal courts to Congress except that there has to be a Chief Justice.
Got it. Thanks for the clarification.
My main point is that now insufficient justice is being done as the nation has a much large population, hence need.
Most of the cases are political matters congress ignores to not upset their voters. SCOTUS should ingore those an make congress act.
David I just have one question after your comment…AND? Is Hunter now on par with one of the great impressionists?
If he ends up with a museum dedicated to his art then he would be.
Time will tell, but I rather doubt it.
Sure he could.
It would just be an extension of further grift. All the “supporters” would be anonymous, giving thousands or even millions for the illusion of access to the Biden brand.
Kinda like the Clinton Foundation.
For fine artists (unlike commercial artists at ad agencies, publishers, etc), the vast majority of fine artists need a small handful of fans to purchase their artwork.
That’s where the term “starving artists” comes from. There are many excellent fine artists that never make a living doing it.
Hunter is not the exception, to make a living doing it, every artist has to essentially establish a fan club to buy their artwork.
Even if Hunter pursued commercial art at an ad agency, publisher, etc., those jobs are hard to get also.
If the gallerists testimony is correct isn’t there a gigantic Tax scam here ?
As described we have Hunter repaying the Democrat Attorney who paid off his Tax liability with Artworks.
While that is perfectly legal for Hunter to do, it means that the lawyers payment of Hunters Taxes is taxable income to Biden in return for his paintings.
Essentially The lawyer prepaid for the paintings.
The rest is just general evidence of how much this administration LIES.
Reporters questioned how Hunters art sales would be separated from the obvious influence pedalling he had engaged in,
And the WH manufactured an ethical arrangement and sold it to the press, when no such thing was every done or discussed with those who would have to operate under it.
It is all just gratuitous lying.
It is not illegal, but it burns credibility on everything else.
“Can you imagine what the Americans would do if Russia backed a coup to overthrow the Mexican government and then supplied arms and training to Mexico’s Army to be deployed right up to the U.S. border.?”
Comments such as this are based on the false premise that Russia and the United States are morally or politically equal. They are not. Russia is evil, whereas the United States is good. Good should threaten evil. Evil should not threaten good. So comments such as this are not really as clever as they sound to those who make them.
Neither Russia nor the US are inherently morally good or evil.
I am proud of my country – unlike most on the left and beleive – with good reason that it is a beacion of light on the hill that other nations should aspire to.
I do not accept the left wing nonsense that this country is irredeemably evil.
But I do grasp that as good as this country is, it has done many bad things in the past.
We can claim the moral high ground – but we can not do so unquestioned.
Conversely – Russia invaded Gerogia, Checknia, and Ukraine. Justified by national security concerns.
The US invaded Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, … and engaged in military actions against numerous other sovereign nations – citing national security concerns.
The example used was Mexico – but in the real world the US DID support an invasion of Cuba, and DID threaten Global Nuclear war over Cuba.
I do not think Russia’s invasions of Georgia or Ukraine are morally justifiable.
But are you going to argue that the US invasion of Iraq was ?
I think the US is “mostly good” while Russia is more morally ambiguous.
Regardless, Putin made no secret that Western efforts to bring its immediate neighboring countries into NATO would NOT be tolerated,
And the US DID forment a Coup in Ukraine pushing out a corrupt russia favoring government in return for a currupt us favoring government.
This is Russias back yard – not ours.
The US has no national security interest in Ukraine.
Russia does.
The Clinton/Nuland Coup in Ukraine was immoral. The invasion of Iraq was immoral.
The US is better than Russia, but that is not totally evident by our behavior.
John – you’re using logic and factual truths. But you need to understand that for the people pushing the Ukraine narrative, they have literally billions of dollars on the line, and so they have to keep it going. (If nothing else, this is evident from simplistic statements like “Russia is evil, whereas the United States is good.”) Where is all that money coming from? You and me, taxpayers. You’re trying to argue with a blood-sucking leech.
John Say,
Great comment.
According to leftists, America is inherently evil.
According to leftists all the founding fathers were evil white men. Some owned slaves.
According to leftists, Israel is a colonizer. They are evil. Leftists chant, “From river to sea.”
Should we threaten Israel?
How is any of this surprising? Has anyone looked into Biden’s 40 year political career?
I’m re-posting this from below since many may not read down that far:
In other bizarre news, Hunter is seated with the audience at the House Oversight Committee where they are going to vote to hold him in contempt for not appearing for his deposition. Many reporters don’t understand (or perhaps don’t want to understand) the difference between being deposed and his offer to testify publicly. But you have to give him credit for chutzpah.
Got out before the Sgt at Arms could have restrained him.
He knew this and was flaunting his disdain…
Its ok, the art dealer’s testimony just shredded him and showed yet another link to a pay to play bribe scandal.
-G
𝐑𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐑: Tickler File: 𝐆𝐎𝐏 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒 𝐃𝐞𝐛𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬
The Republican National Committee (RNC) released candidates from a requirement that they participate in only party-sanctioned debates, clearing the path for major networks to host unsanctioned events. All dates are subject to change as are the appearances of the Candidates.
Update: the 𝐉𝐚𝐧. 𝟏𝟎𝐭𝐡, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒 (Wednesday) debate 𝙢𝙖𝙮 𝙗𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙩 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝘾𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨 that have yet to confirm participation in the later debates.
𝐓𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓: 𝐉𝐚𝐧. 𝟏𝟎𝐭𝐡, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒 (Wednesday) debate in Des Moines, Iowa [CNN] 9pm ET at 𝐃𝐫𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐲
———————————————————————————————————————-
𝐉𝐚𝐧. 𝟏𝟖𝐭𝐡, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒 (𝐓𝐡𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐲) debate in Manchester, New Hampshire [ABC] at 𝐒𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐀𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐦 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞
𝐉𝐚𝐧. 𝟐𝟏𝐬𝐭, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒 (𝐒𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐲) debate in New Hampshire [CNN] at 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞
Turley! How did you miss the opportunity to write a post about how it is reasonable for the president to get immunity from prosecution for assassinating political rivals.
Another comment demanding the good professor to write what you want him to write?
You should start your own blog so no one could go to it.
I would check out an Upstate Farmer blog!
HullBobby,
LOL! Thank you for the support, but I am afraid it would be very boring. Hauled hay. Mucked out stalls. Move livestock. Watered livestock. Split/stacked firewood. So thrilling!(not really)
🙂
During the 2016 campaign, Trump confidently bragged that he could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue & shoot someone & “I wouldn’t lose any voters.” And those voters would likely stick with him even if he ordered a Seal Team 6 to assassinate his political opponents.
Trump is now insisting Nikki Haley should be disqualified because her parents weren’t US citizens when she was born. In 2016, he said Ted Cruz should have been disqualifed. And of course, he relentlessly claimed Obama had a fake birth certificate. Bonus points for consistency, DJT.
So ? Democrats claim everyone who disagrees with them is a Nazi ?
Trump has not shot anyone so we can not put that theory to a test.
Obama did assassinate a US citizen.
Trump has not ordered anyones assassination.
In fact he has never DONE any of the politically vindictive things he claimed he could.
Buit Biden has ACTUALLY done everything democrats impeached Trump for.
For the record, 10 House Republicans voted to impeach Trump & 7 Republican Senators voted to convict Trump for inciting an insurrection. If House Republicans impeach Biden, we’ll soon find out whether they get as much bipartisan support as Trump’s 2nd impeachment had.
You completely missed Trump’s point about being able to shoot someone on 5th Avenue & not lose any support. He was boasting that his supporters will stick with him even if he murdered someone in broad daylight. It’s irrelevant whether he actually ever shot anyone, John.
Presidents already have immunity for assassinations. Obama assassinates a US citizen in Yemen. When asked he confiremd he could have done so in Ohio.
We have a mechanism for dealing with determining whether the presidents excercise of presidential powers is immune or not.
The president can be indicted, tried and convicted, AFTER they are impeached and convicted by the Senate.
This is how the law and constitutioon have been determine to apply to judges – whose immunity comes from the same portions of the constitution as the presidents, but is LESS extensive than the presidents.
Bidenethics.
Dealer can expect a service call from Hillary’s Arkancide, Inc. in 5…4…3…2…
Hillary is not a big biden fan. The initial exposure of the Burisma scandal was from a Clinton operative in 2015 to get Biden out of the race.
Now if somebody targeted the Clinton Foundation corruption …..
Welcome to Professor Turley’s 197th post about Hunter Biden. Turley insists “the press played up his success as an artist.” Seriously?
CNN: “If I were a museum curator, I would struggle to find compelling reasons to share it with the public. For the most part, people with influence in the art world are looking at his work and thinking, “Nothing much to see here.”
NY Times: “The gallery is asking as much as $500,000 for 15 works by Hunter Biden. The prices—which are high for a novice artist—have raised questions in Washington about whether the works might attract buyers seeking to curry favor with the Biden White House.”
Washington Post: “Deal of the art: White House grapples with ethics of Hunter Biden’s pricey paintings.”
That’s what Professor Turley characterizes as “the media was reporting Hunter’s art was a huge success.”
This is why I believe the 2020 election was rigged/fraudulent/stolen because the public gets lied to constantly, the truth comes out later, and nothing happens to the liars.
@Anon,
You can believe whatever you want.
Even at the time… while proving election fraud would have been difficult, there were enough anomalies to call the results into question.
Take GA.
We now know that there were ~60K fraudulent votes cast. We don’t know for whom, but this is greater than the margin for Biden.
Take MI.
Another case of fraud, that was buried by the FBI after the Michigan State Police turned the case over to them.
So. looking at the several states where there were close races… there’s enough evidence that the fraud was bad enough to flip those states.
To be clear, the amount of uncovered fraud was high enough in those specific states where the margin of victory was less than the amount of fraud.
So yes, we can say that there’s enough evidence to show election fraud.
And we never did talk about the votes that were cast by legal voters but should have been disallowed for various reasons …
-G
The election was rigged/stolen, that has been established by the Twitter files and the Federal Censorship case.
The open question is how many OTHER forms of election fraud were also committed ?
When you have people who will act – by any means necescary, and you already know they violated the law and constitution, it is reasonable to beleive pretty much any other allegations against them.
Is any of this a surprise? Maybe those J6 protestors really did know more than the rest of us and were willing to act. Unfortunately they had no backup. It’s not as if we did not already know that Biden was dirty and Hunter was beyond reprobate status.
And I would like to see what happens if Biden is defeated and no longer has the presidency to protect him. His self pardons can only protect him from the Feds. I would suspect that there is a list of charges growing in the AG office in Texas and those civil suits that Texas has filed will suddenly turn into criminal charges. Every attempt by the present DOJ to strike down presidential immunity only widens the likelihood of criminal charges against this president. Maybe medical malpractice charges against the White House Doctor also and Again aiding and abetting fraud against the citizens of the US by Jill, and elder abuse also.
IF. One still has to get him out of office.
“Naftali purchased her first piece of Hunter Biden’s artwork and later, in July 2022, President Biden announced Naftali’s appointment . . .”
But, but: Hunter’s not president. And where are the videos of Joe stuffing his pockets with Naftali’s money?
One of the sad things about that kleptocratic family is that they’re not very clever. At least Madoff was clever. The Biden’s are just a street-corner shell game.
More and more the Biden admin makes the US look like a banana republic.
I think you are confused. It is trump that makes us look that way. Fomenting an insurrection when he lost the election? That is what happens in third world countries, not the USA. Calling wounded soldiers losers? making fun of people with disabilities? These are all things the orange man does. Who supports people like this?
Which insurrection are you talking about?
I have to see the proof first..
You know: ACTUAL proof, like I do’t know, a forgotten laptop or so? Written emails? A video with a ‘Quid Pro Quo..’
Oh, wait..: that is all Biden..
Trump is a proper noun and should be capitalized accordingly.
Bob is Eb who recently announced he was leaving the blog. Yet here he is again and again desperately seeking attention
Apparently Workmens Compensation will not cover loss of employment trolling for George Soros under scores of sucky puppets
You must not be a bridge player.
Every single example you just gave has been debunked or not true. Every time I hear or read something new about the Bidens it makes me wonder why it took his DOJ three years to charge Trump with anything for which they are having problems proving. The DOJ still has not charged Trump with insurrection, yet the Dems are trying to get him removed from the ballot based on “a feeling” that he’s not worthy. The voters of this country should have the opportunity to voice whether they think him worthy or not.
Trump just filed an immunity claim in GA, the claim is excellent for many reasons.
First it is filled with TONS of law as well as history of PResidents doing things much as Trump did – including involving themselves in elections and election fraud.
But one of the more important arguments it hat it lists the allegations that Fanni has made and documents that each and everyone is an example of a president executing on his executive constitutional powers – again often with historical examples of other presidents doing the same.
One of the huge problems witht he Democratic efforts to “get Trump” is they are entirely spin, narative, and abuse of the meaning of words.
Barr who has constantly condemned Trump’s actions publicly over the past 3 years stated CLEARLY on the MSM
THERE WAS NO INSURECTION and that the claim was absurd.
But that is Constantly what we get fromt he left – egregious word mangling
I am not confused.
Who uses the DOJ, FBI, IRS to go after their political opponents while protecting the BCF?
Who used 51 former intelligence members and MSM to cover up the laptop from hell, there by influencing an election? Polls show people would of voted differently had they known more about the laptop from hell.
Who uses courts and unelected bureaucrats to keep someone off a ballot like Iran does without due process?
Who showered with his own daughter?
Who supports people like this?
Upstate Farmer bringing the heat!
Bob, you do understand you have lost control of the narative ?
People are not listening.
You have cried wolf too many times.
We spent four painful years debunking the collusion delusion. despite the fact that it was an obvious lie from the start.
We did NOT know it was also a fraud.
We now have the covid mess, the twitter files, the bureau of misinformation.
The lies about pretty much everything,
The constant violations of multi century norms,
The by any means necescary approach to defeating Trump.
People have had enough. You have cried wolf too many times.
No one is listening.
Come november the wolf is coming.
That is what happens when you lie over and over.
It will take YEARS of careful truth telling to regain credibility – and you do not have that in you.
Each of your claims in your post above is garbage – and most people KNOW it.
We saw an insurrection on Oct 7. That immage is seared in our minds.
Many of us have now seen the “This is ARt” sign on the rickety fake gallows that you hyped into another law.
Not only is the Capitol video obliterating your claims,
But it is increasingly making clear the deceptive false color images that the left and the media used to lie about J6.
Look at the house video – it appears that protestors were trying to burn the capitol.
But there was no arson on J6 -= as compared to every other left wing protest ever.
The smoke was from the Tear Gas of the CP.
And the glowing red that suggest fire – was the false color of the images.