Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has finally broken her silence with CNN. Willis insisted that she has done nothing wrong while declaring that “the train is coming” for Donald Trump. On this occasion, CNN can be excused for not having an opposing view. Willis circa 2020 denounced Willis circa 2024.
Willis told a CNN reporter “I don’t feel like my reputation needs to be reclaimed. I guess my greatest crime is I had a relationship with a man, that’s not something I find embarrassing in any way. And I know that I have not done anything that’s illegal.”
The most obvious person to interview in rebuttal of that statement is Willis’s 2020 self. After all, she repeatedly declared that she would not have any romantic relationship with those in her office.
Willis ran against her former boss Paul Howard, who was embroiled in a sexual harassment scandal involving his relationship with women in his office.
Willis offered both experience and ethical leadership, including pledging repeatedly that “I will certainly not be choosing to date people that work under me.”
When confronted with this repeated campaign promise on the stand, Willis came up with a perfectly bizarre spin about Nathan Wade being literally “special” as a special prosecutor. While she hired him, supervised him, and controlled his continued employment with the office, she tried to suggest that he was not really part of the office in the same sense.
Willis notably stressed that she did nothing “illegal.” She did not address whether she acted unethically. The court itself denounced her for unprofessional conduct in this controversy, including her speech at a church suggesting that racism was behind these allegations.
Moreover, it may be too early to tell if she is entirely free of criminal allegations. Many believe that both she and Wade gave knowingly false or misleading testimony. That is a problem not just for them as individuals but for the office in this case.
Willis and Wade were both prosecuting people for the very same conduct of filing false statements with courts and making false statements. The two lawyers testified in tandem but only one was disqualified.
While the Court casts doubt on Wade’s testimony on the relationship, it ignored that Willis effectively ratified those claims in her own testimony.
Putting aside the pledge of a train coming for Trump, there is the problem that there are usually two tracks and another train may be coming for Willis as the state (and potentially the bar) looks into these allegations.
Leticia James, Fani Willis, and Alvin Bragg are racists.
Three African-Americans on one actual American; that sounds like the right ratio.
Then you add Chutkan and Obama, and you have, “Winner, winner, chicken dinner!”
Is it too much to ask that Fani not do the nasty with the guy she hired to lead the politically charged persecution of the Democrats’ most feared political opponent?
Fani was Gettin Jiggy Wit It
OT
They “fixed” 2020 and they’re “fixing” 2024.
Leticia James politically prosecuted Real President Donald J. Trump for “victimless crimes.”
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
“VICTIMLESS CRIMES – THE THRESHOLD QUESTION AND BEYOND”
NCJ Number
NOTRE DAME LAWYER Volume: 52 Issue: 5 Dated: (JUNE 1977) Pages: 995-1014
Author(s) J F WINTERSCHEID
Date Published 1977 – Length 20 pages
“IT IS CONCLUDED THAT VICTIMLESS CRIMES ARE, AT BEST, EXAMPLES OF THE ‘OVERREACH’ OF CRIMINAL LAW AND ARE, IN MANY RESPECTS, CONSTITUTIONALLY SUSPECT.”
– Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
Remembering The Fuhrman Trial
Back in the 1990’s there was a famous trial here in Los Angeles regarding a White police detective who was charged with using the ‘N’ word.
His name was Mark Fuhrman. While investigating a double murder, Fuhrman found a crucial piece of evidence that seemingly linked a famous suspect to the crime.
The suspect was Black NFL star turned NBC sports commenter whose side job as spokesman for Hertz Rent-A-Car made him one of the most recognized faces in America.
That famous Black suspect seemed to self-distruct when first arrested for the crime. But he quickly gathered his bearings and hired a ‘dream team’ of crack lawyers. Those crack lawyers then came up with the brilliant strategy of putting Detective Mark Fuhrman on trial.
You see, Detective Fuhrman had used the ‘N’ word many times in the past, according to a few witnesses. And their testimony was enough to convince jurors that Fuhrman was racist enough to frame the famous Black suspect by planting key evidence.
The famous Black suspect was ‘rightly’ acquitted (despite mountains of evidence). Detective Fuhrman, however, was forced to plead ‘no contest’ to perjury. Because he had denied using the ‘N’ word when it was actually caught on tape.
One can see many parallels between the Mark Fuhrman trial and the Fani Willis trial. Only this time the racial identities are switched. Now the original suspect is an White, NBC reality star turned politician.
That White politician was recorded in a phone onversation to Georgia’s Secretary of State. He had called to pressure that state official into changing the tallies of a recent election. It was arguably the most incriminating audio tape ever made of a U.S. President. One would presume the prosecution would be a slam dunk.
But you see the Black prosecutor, trying this case, had an affair with a lawyer on her staff. So now we’re supposed to forget all about that call the White politician made. Instead we must focus exclusively on the Black prosecutor and the horrible crime she committed. When women have affairs it is far, far more serious than hanky-panky involving men. For that reason, most Republican states are cracking-down on abortion.
Therefore every decent, God-fearing White Christian America wants to see this Black prosecutor burned at the stake of public opinion. The phone call that White politician made should no longer be mentioned. It never happened, as Professor Turley pretends. And besides, overturning legitimate elections is no big deal at all.
………………………………….
O J Simpson and Donald Trump were born less than a year apart and both were longtime employees of the NBC television network.
It was the venue, stupid. The venue produced a racist jury—9 African-American members, 1 Hispanic, 2 Whites—that was insuperable.
No other person was and will ever be suspected, investigated, prosecuted, or convicted for the double murder that OJ Simpson committed.
Blacks are definitively racist, according to the non-racist, anti-racism, liberal luminary, Scott Adams, of Dilbert cartoon fame.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
To wit,
“IT’S OK TO BE WHITE.”
– Rasmussen
_______________
47% of blacks disagree while only 53% agree.
__________________________________________________
“Blacks are a hate group.”
“As you know, I’ve been identifying as Black for a while – years now – because I like – you know, I like to be on the winning team.”
“The best advice I would give to white people is to get the hell away from Black people.”
“Just get the f*** away.”
“Wherever you have to go, just get away because there’s no fixing this.”
“You just have to escape, so that’s what I did.”
– Scott Adams, “Dilbert”
__________________________
Even for the deranged, hysterical, incoherent, bleeding-heart, liberal, progressive, socialist, democrat, RINO, AINO communists, “…THERE’S NO FIXING THIS!”
Tell readers how a man OJ’s size decapitated with his own hands and a knife a fully grown male with martial arts training and almost decapitated his ex-wife adult, then walk to his own personal vehicle with white carpet and deposit sum total 2 drops of blood on the vehicle carpet, neither of which drops exceeded the diameter of a US dime. The average living adult has about 5L of blood. Do you have any idea on earth how much blood results when a human being is decapitated?
Serious Q: really, explain how the above scenario is possible. That’s what you and about 99.999% of people believe who are familiar with the crime.
Evidence suggests the most likely murderer was Jason Simpson, with a criminal history and past mental health issues. He attended culinary school at the time and as anyone familiar with such students knows, they commonly carry their professional tools (knives, etc.) around in a black carry bag.
OJ knew the true killer and he did what he had been doing for much of Jason’s life: covering for Jason after he got into trouble because OJ felt guilty for his absence and general lack of parenting skills while his kids were growing up.
Jason killed the two victims, called his dad like he always did prior, OJ appeared at the scene, stopped about 20 feet from the victims, knowing they were obviously dead and returned to his car. (First responders can legally presume death in 3 cases: rigor mortice, decapitation and heart detached from the chest cavity; beyond that only an MD or in some cases a Paramedic can legally proclaim death-there are multiple cases where First Responders wrongly presumed death of living persons.) OJ did his best to avoid the blood but even at 20 feet distance his shoes inevitably picked up a few drops because the quantity of blood was immense.
LAPD and the DA know who murdered Nicole. You couldn’t pay them all the money in the world to reopen that case after their prior travesty.
And America didn’t land astronauts on the moon.
Not being true to thyself just means that an individual can live in their own little world of normalcy that consists of nothing but falsehoods.
Leticia James, Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg…
Lincoln sacrificed the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Nation for the slaves.
Lincoln was a great man.
Jonathan: I get it. It’s time again to go after Fani Willis. But get real. Do you really think the state of GA is going to go after Willis? Or do you think she faces problems with the state bar? That’s not the “train” coming down the track. Judge McAffee has already found Willis not disqualified. That means Willis is back on her fast “train” to prosecute DJT and his other defendants–calling for a trial date in July. The only other “train” Willis faces is her re-election in November. The voters will decide whether she is qualified to lead the Fulton County DA office. Let the voters decide!
The real problem is not what is happening in Fulton county. The real cliff hanger today is what is DJT doing to find the money to post the bond in the $464 judgment? AG James now has that judgment in her back pocket and is ready to begin taking DJT’s properties starting tomorrow. How is DJT going to prevent that? There are several theories.
One theory is that DJT will get his new merged SPAC/ Trump Media company (DWAC) to let him access his stock shares–sell them to pay for the bond. That presents several problems. First, is the 6-month restriction on selling shares. But since DJT owns the company and his Board they could easily suspend that limitation. Second, DWAC stock went down 13.71 points as of the ending of trading on Friday. Short sellers are are betting on further declines in share value that would happen if Trump sold off his shares. Third, a dramatic fall in DWAC share value would cause other investors to stream to the court houses. A prudent board with fiduciary responsibilities wouldn’t like that scenario. But DJT is desperate so who knows what he might get his Board to do to protect him.
Another theory is that DJT is willing to let AG James execute on her judgment. It will allow him to further grift off his MAGA supporters. In a post yesterday DJT told his supporters in a plea for money: “Trump Tower is mine!…Rabid Trump hating AG Letitia James wants to SEIZE by properties in New York!!” DJT thinks that allowing James to start to seize his properties will actually help his campaign. “Defendant” DJT thinks that helps candidate DJT. That’s a deception because DJT knows it would take at least 30 days for James to actually seize his properties–it’s a long process before James can actually put a padlock on a property and put it up for sale by the sheriff. DJT also knows that in NY there is a right to “redemption”. This gives the debtor the right to post a bond before any sale takes place and reclaim his property. So DJT is misleading his MAGA supporters to grift off them–falsely claiming James is going to start seizing his properties on Monday.
So why doesn’t DJT just file for bankruptcy and get over with it? For DJT that’s not an option. The optics would be terrible–the GOP candidate filing for bankruptcy for the seventh time! What is clear is that DJT loves drama. He likes to drag things out until the last moment and then pull the rabbit out of the hat. We’ll see tomorrow whether there is actually any rabbit in the hat!
@Dennis: Re: “We’ll see tomorrow whether there is actually any rabbit in the hat!” …..and won’t you and others of your ilk be pissed to shit if there is….and….if DJT survives the slings and arrows of outrageous misfortune to sit behind the desk in the Oval Office once again.
“Do you really think the state of GA is going to go after Willis?”
Yes, Willis has made a huge mess of things. She has embarrassed democrats in a state controlled by republicans.
First Republicans are going to use her as a pinyata for as long as they can. While Kemp and others in the GA executive are Not Trump supporters – they are also NOT Chenney supporters. Kemp is MAGA light without the confrontational aspects of Trump.
He is also a republican governor in a pink state. he is NOT Gov. Noem, He is also NOT Romney.
I would further note that the GA GOP is essentially at war with Fulton County – but they do NOT want that war to be over Trump.
Raffensberger has ACTIVELY been fighting election fraud in Fulton county – he just was unwilling to have his fight against the well known corruption in Fulton county get tied to Trump.
One the opposite side – Willis has embarrassed Democrats. I actually expect she will be forced by DEMOCRATS to resign – so that republicans do not spend the next year or so publicly impeaching her.
“Judge McAffee has already found Willis not disqualified.”
No McAffee found 5 times the problems needed to DQ her, but bailed on pulling the trigger.
He approved Trump’s appeal of his decision – which he did not have to.
McAfee is playing politics. He KNOWS she must go. But DQ’ing her could cost him re-election.
Letting the appeals court do it provides him political cover.
“That means Willis is back on her fast “train” to prosecute DJT and his other defendants–calling for a trial date in July.”
She is saying all kinds of things – that does not make them so. McAfee is NOT a solid rule of law judge. He is not a profile in courage.
But he is also NOT EnMoron or Kaplan of Chutcan. Trump will not get a “fair” trial out of McAffee, but he also will not get a star chamber trial.
Do not expect this to go anywhere fast. I would note that BEFORE the current delay – Willis did not beleive this could finnish before the election. This is an unbeleiveably complicated trial that is going to take months – both to get to, and to finish.
The next problem I will suggest for you is that at most you can get ONE of these trials in before the election – that is in a perfect world.
Trump can not be in two courts at once and he has a constitutional right to be present at a criminal trial. He can CHOOSE not to attend any day he wants. But no court can proceed if he is unable to attend – such as if he is in a trial elsewhere.
But it is worse than that. If as an example – Smith gets his way and schedules the MAL trial for August – then Willis can not start in July – or she has to recess while the MAL trial is ongoing – or visa versa.
Further if Smith schedules july – no one else can schedule july. And if Smith schedules july and and later they july date falls through – everyone else lost july and now they are all fighting over dates in an ever shrinking window.
And No trial ever starts when they say it will.
Conversely if Willis schedules first and schedules july – and her trial is supposed to go many months – she blocks everyone else until the election. and if she does not make the july date – which she wont, your screwed.
Next While McAfee did not DQ Willis – The Fulton County DA’s office has burned any good will it had with McAffee.
You can expect that the DA’s office – which already was not getting everything they wanted will find it ever harder to get McAffee to rule in their favor. He has already tossed the biggest charges – the bulk of the case, and though those can be refiled – not without calling a new grand jury and that will take past the election.
Whether you like it or not Willis is done. Democrats would be wise to drop her and get the GA case out of the way of the other cases.
“The voters will decide whether she is qualified to lead the Fulton County DA office. Let the voters decide!”
She lied repeatedly under oath – that is actually far more serious than anything you have accused Trump of.
Further she is a prosecutor – not a state senator. Not a governor.
She is suposed to be prosecuting people who lie under oath – not Be one of them.
” The real cliff hanger today is what is DJT doing to find the money to post the bond in the $464 judgment? ”
Only those of you on the left think this will end well for you.
I do not know what will happen tomorow.
I do know what will NOT happen tomorow.
Trump will not be out of the race.
Trump will be stronger at the end of the day than the begining.
It is currently rumorour that he has secured a bond.
But that might not be true – though the successful Public offering on Friday does increase his net worth by 150%
It is just not liquid for another 6-9 months. But he MIGHT be able to use the 3.4B in stock as security for a bond.
Or he might decide to let James screw up and go after his properties.
“One theory is that DJT will get his new merged SPAC/ Trump Media company (DWAC) to let him access his stock shares–sell them to pay for the bond.”
Highly unlikely the SEC does not like 70% shareholders liquidating immediately after going public.
But it is likely he can use shares as collateral for a bond.
“Second, DWAC stock went down 13.71 points as of the ending of trading on Friday. Short sellers are are betting on further declines in share value that would happen if Trump sold off his shares. Third, a dramatic fall in DWAC share value would cause other investors to stream to the court houses. A prudent board with fiduciary responsibilities wouldn’t like that scenario. ”
All true – but has NOTHING to do with using the shares as collateral.
BTW the DJIA stock ID will be DJT on Monday – Not DWAC.
The DWAS price at close Friday was down 6pts from Friday’s opening price and up 1pts from 5 days ago. It is up 20pts since january.
Trump selling shares will negatively effect it – but the BIG factor will be the upcoming SCOTUS free speech cases.
Perversely if SCOTUS allows TX/FL to bar some SM cesnsorship – and/or they rule infaovr of the Missouri AG against the Federal govenrment
Then DJT will go down. but if the left wins those cases they value of Trump’s holdings will Rise.
Truth .. are just 2nd tier SM companies if the abuse of the top tier companies are reigned in.
If they are NOT then the value of those SM companies that actually allow free speech rises.
The supreme court decisions are far more important to DJT’s value than whether he sells some shares.
“But DJT is desperate”
You keep trying to read peoples mind. Trump is angry – he is not desparate.
He can afford to lose everything in NY. It is unlikely he will. But he can.
“Another theory is that DJT is willing to let AG James execute on her judgment. ”
And continue to challenge it. the NY appeals courts will be forced to confront the possible economic carnage that will ensure if they allow james to confiscate his property and deny him a right to appeal.
“It will allow him to further grift off his MAGA supporters. In a post yesterday DJT told his supporters in a plea for money: ”
Trump has NOT asked ANYONE to “give” him money. A third part setup a gofund me – Trump is clear – he is not after money from supporters. Trump and Musk met at MAL recently – there was specualtion that Trump was after money from Musk. Elon confirmed that Trump has NOT asked.
I know you are clueless politically. But Trump will get a bond if he can. But he is highly unlikely to accept money from a number of sources that he does have available to him.
He is NOT going to ask other billionaires for money
He is not going to the chinese or Saudi’s.
He is NOT going to supporters.
“Trump Tower is mine!…Rabid Trump hating AG Letitia James wants to SEIZE by properties in New York!!”
Righteous anger – not a plea for money.
“DJT thinks that allowing James to start to seize his properties will actually help his campaign.”
Correct, and that has worked incredibly well so far.
Even Democrat political strategist Frank Lund said on CNN that if James starts zeizing property – the eleciton is over and Trump has won.
But you are free to beleive otherwise.
“That’s a deception because DJT knows it would take at least 30 days for James to actually seize his properties”
James has already started the process. Regardless – what is it you think is deceptive ? It does not matter if it takes James a year to take over the properties.
“it’s a long process before James can actually put a padlock on a property and put it up for sale by the sheriff.”
Can’t actually do either. The properties are occupied and as a matter of law all the leases and contracts remain in effect.
James would become responsible for managing the properties prior to sale, Further most of Trump’s NY properties have mortgages – that means James can not just “sherriff” them. She is going to be stuck managing them for months. Asuming the courts let her.
She will likely lose millions during that time, she will piss of vendors and tenants.
Have fun.
” So DJT is misleading his MAGA supporters to grift off them”
Trump has not asked supporters for money.
“alsely claiming James is going to start seizing his properties on Monday.”
James has already started to seize the properties – that is not a false claim.
It may take her time to succeed, but that does not change that she has started.
“So why doesn’t DJT just file for bankruptcy and get over with it?”
Highly unlikely. It would not change anything. Trump has far more assets than liabilities.
As even you seem to be aware – Trump’s net worth jumped $3.4B on friday.
“For DJT that’s not an option. The optics would be terrible–the GOP candidate filing for bankruptcy for the seventh time! ”
Likely correct – but that has not stopped you from hawking that claim repeatedly.
Regardless Trump does not need to go bankrupt.
“What is clear is that DJT loves drama.”
True – he is very good at it.
“He likes to drag things out until the last moment and then pull the rabbit out of the hat.”
Also true, it is part of his appeal.
“We’ll see tomorrow whether there is actually any rabbit in the hat!”
Nope, absolutely guaranteed tomorow will pass and Trump will still be standing – stronger than ever.
We do not know WHAT Trump will do, or even if he will do anything.
But Trump does not need to pull a rabbit out of his hat.
Personally I am betting he does nothing. That he gambles that the NY courts when faced with the consequences of the courts actions will blink. And I would bet that he is correct.
But there are rumours he has managed a bond deal. If so – I am guessing he is using the SPAC stock as collateral.
Regardless, tomorow will come and go, And Trump will still be standing.
Regardless, you have given him an excellent campaign issue.
Erik Trump said this morning that Trump has substantially all the cash but has earmarked it for use in the campaign. If true, my guess is that he will use this cash to get his appeal and sell the Truth Social stock gradually to raise cash for the campaign, as and when needed. He could do that with permission from the Board, who could put parameters around the timing and amount of any sales, to prevent them from hammering the market. If not true, he could pledge the shares to a lender to raise the cash for the appeal. The Board would likely allow this, so long as the loan comes due after the six months restricted period, ideally in instalments to ensure that the stock does not hit the market in one go.
Eventually the Engoron judgment will be reversed, either or both as an excessive fine and/or violation of due process. If the NY courts retain any semblance of concern for the rule of law, especially as applied to business matters, they will do this themselves. Otherwise it will make it to the Supreme Court.
This country is beginning to look like Putin’s Russia, which used the legal system to destroy rivals, most notably Khodorkovsky and his company Yukos, which was absorbed in the end by Rosneft.
Is anyone going after Judge Engoron? How can he get away with this judicial tyranny?
Meaning why should his outrageous ruling have to wait another day for further review? Right now it is apparent to everyone that this is tyrannical judicial overreach and election interference. It should not be given any credence at all. Engoron should be stopped immediately.
John Say, I like your comments, they are a nice addendum to the columns, but you were 100% positive that Fani was going to be bounced off the case and maybe I missed it, but you have not addressed your mistaken strong statements.
When a judicial official sits in the chair and alleged lies, that is too egregious. If that is acceptable by you, there is no surprise there. Fani will get wiped big time. Big derecho wind of changes coming.
Any attempt to steal or take away a duly elected DJT presidency will result in a civil war. That is the fact so many are in denial about. The question is, will it be worth it?
“Do you really think the state of GA is going to go after Willis?”
Dennis, who claims to be a lawyer, believe lying in court, and lying on court documents is meaningless.
My dog knows more about the law than DM
““the train is coming” for Donald Trump.”
I personally wrote Trump off when he made the remarks about McCain as a POW during the 2016 primary.
That is the LAST time I underestimated Trump.
We have been hearing that the Train is coming for Trump since 2015.
The only Train that appears to be coming for Trump is the one to the WH in 2024.
You can love Trump, you can hate Trump.
Betting against him is stupid.
But you are free to beleive as you wish.
“‘The train is coming’ for Donald Trump.”
~+~
That would be a Circus Train…and she is the conductor.
Darren…… “Circus Train”? I’m thinking more “Clown Car”!
“The most obvious person to interview in rebuttal of that statement is Willis’s 2020 self. After all, she repeatedly declared that she would not have any romantic relationship with those in her office. Willis ran against her former boss Paul Howard, who was embroiled in a sexual harassment scandal involving his relationship with women in his office.
Willis offered both experience and ethical leadership, including pledging repeatedly that “I will certainly not be choosing to date people that work under me.”
***********************************
“As witnesses not of our intentions but of our conduct, we can be true or false, and the hypocrite’s crime is that he bears false witness against himself. What makes it so plausible to assume that hypocrisy is the vice of vices is that integrity can indeed exist under the cover of all other vices except this one. Only crime and the criminal, it is true, confront us with the perplexity of radical evil; but only the hypocrite is really rotten to the core.”
~Hannah Arendt
Have we reached peak fake yet? Fake news, fake law, fake crimes, fake prosecutions, fake emergencies, a fake president, fake border security, fake green energy, fake three-letter agencies, fake representatives, fake senators, and fake concern for “our democracy.”
The course the USA is on is not sustainable.. It will all come crashing down pretty soon. I’ve been hoping that ‘pretty soon’ would be at least two years out so I can wait that long to move out of my current school district, and my adult children will have time to get away from their large metropolitan areas (and hopefully move closer to us), but I’m starting to feel we don’t even have that much time.
Yes, and the lies coming from Biden and Democrats (and Propaganda Fake News) are getting even more brazen and preposterous.
Rep. AOC today on TV: Trump “ordered essentially a terrorist attack” on the U.S. Capitol.
Pres. Biden in campaign ad: “Remember, during the pandemic Donald Trump told us to inject ourselves with bleach”
Pres. Biden: It’s Trump’s fault the border is in chaos! My hands are tied!
‘Bimbo eruptions’ Stephanopolous on ABC: “Trump is a rapist. Guilty of rape! He’s a Rapist!”
Corrupt AG Letitia James beginning on Monday: “…could use a Marshall or a Sheriff to begin freezing Trump’s bank accounts and taking prized properties like Trump Tower and 40 Wall Street.”
Democrat lying and lawlessness is out of control and completely unhinged.
Who is going to step in and stop it?
We are in very dangerous territory.
Man put reins on horses, and control rods, and cooling pools around the fuel rods in nuclear power plants.
Man harnessed the power.
The vote in America, as intended by the Founders, was and must have been maintained in its import and solemnity and harnessed and restricted to well-qualified actual “natural born” citizens and voters.
______________________
“[We gave you] a [restricted-vote] republic, if you can keep it.”
– Ben Franklin
_________________
You couldn’t.
“The most obvious person to interview in rebuttal of that statement is Willis’s 2020 self. After all, she repeatedly declared that she would not have any romantic relationship with those in her office.”
Oh my god. Convene a grand jury NOW! Is this a crime punishable by death? Please tell me JT. Inquiring minds want to know.
This is like way worse than refusing to accept the results of an election. By far worse than raping a woman. And heaven forbid someone commit fraud with their business in order to reap profits not available to those that don’t commit fraud. Oh, and don’t forget the minor issue of keeping classified documents in your bathroom. I mean, this is all nothing compared to having a romantic relationship with someone in your office.
Give me a break. Have you sunk so low JT you now have to talk about romantic relationships amongst prosecutors?
JT, and all you trump sycophants, you are sick, sick and need help.
Right…like no democrats have ever done any of the things you mentioned!
It is impossible to debate a brainwashed Democrat. The Democrat “narrative” of lies has been set, spread by the fake news media, and dutifully regurgitated (puked out, projectile vomited) by the useful idiots of the Democrat Party — this is Biden’s “base”….. LOL.
You have clearly been drinking the TDS Koolade and have no idea what constitutes a legitimate justice system.
So it’s OK to “rig” an election? So it’s OK to violate and ignore particular State constitutions and election laws? So it’s OK to sic the FBI on Facebook and social media to compel them to act against a particular candidate? So it’s moral, legal, and good to deprive the public of the evidence of the Hunter Biden laptop in all its comprehensive glory? Can you imagine the result of an election wherein a candidate is irrefutably revealed to be a bribed, depraved, and treasonous criminal? You’re all in for corruption, right? You’re out of your ——- mind, comrade!
____________
Zuckerberg tells Rogan FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship
Mark Zuckerberg says Facebook restricting a story about Joe Biden’s son during the 2020 election was based on FBI misinformation warnings. The New York Post alleged leaked emails from Hunter Biden’s laptop showed the then vice-president was helping his son’s business dealings in Ukraine. Facebook and Twitter restricted sharing of the article, before reversing course amid allegations of censorship.
Zuckerberg said that getting the decision wrong “sucks”.
“When we take down something that we’re not supposed to, that’s the worst,” Zuckerberg said in a rare extended media interview on the Joe Rogan podcast.
The New York Post story was released just weeks before the presidential election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, which Mr Biden won.
It claimed that a laptop, abandoned in a repair shop by Hunter Biden, contained emails which included details of Hunter introducing a Ukrainian energy tycoon to his father and arranging a meeting. Critically, it fed into long-running unproven allegations about corruption on Joe Biden’s part to ensure his son’s business success in Ukraine.
In that context, the New York Post story, based on exclusive data no other news agency had access to, was met with scepticism – and censored by social media outlets.
Zuckerberg told Rogan: “The background here is that the FBI came to us – some folks on our team – and was like ‘hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically there’s about to be some kind of dump that’s similar to that'” Facebook thought it “fit that pattern”.
___________
Attorney General of Texas
AG Paxton Sues Battleground States for Unconstitutional Changes to 2020 Election Laws
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton today filed a lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin in the United States Supreme Court. The four states exploited the COVID-19 pandemic to justify ignoring federal and state election laws and unlawfully enacting last-minute changes, thus skewing the results of the 2020 General Election. The battleground states flooded their people with unlawful ballot applications and ballots while ignoring statutory requirements as to how they were received, evaluated and counted.
“Trust in the integrity of our election processes is sacrosanct and binds our citizenry and the States in this Union together. Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin destroyed that trust and compromised the security and integrity of the 2020 election. The states violated statutes enacted by their duly elected legislatures, thereby violating the Constitution. By ignoring both state and federal law, these states have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but of Texas and every other state that held lawful elections,” said Attorney General Paxton. “Their failure to abide by the rule of law casts a dark shadow of doubt over the outcome of the entire election. We now ask that the Supreme Court step in to correct this egregious error.”
Elections for federal office must comport with federal constitutional standards. For presidential elections, each state must appoint its electors to the electoral college in a manner that complies with the Constitution. The Electors Clause requirement that only state legislatures may set the rules governing the appointment of electors and elections and cannot be delegated to local officials. The majority of the rushed decisions, made by local officials, were not approved by the state legislatures, thereby circumventing the Constitution.
George said: “Zuckerberg tells Rogan FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship”
Pretty thin sauce from Zuckerberg, imo. Starts off as if the claim is going to be that the FBI mentioned the Hunter Biden laptop story specifically as disinformation; turns out that the actual claim is that the FBI had previously told FB that there was “some kind of” Russian propaganda dump coming, and FB thought the laptop story resembled that remark? So with further ado (or research) FB stomped on it? Give me a small break!
“When we take down something that we’re not supposed to, that’s the worst,” Zuckerberg said in a rare extended media interview on the Joe Rogan podcast.
Zuckerberg said that getting the decision wrong “sucks”.
Translate that.
Here, I will.
“We used the FBI scam to take down everything positive about Trump and to put up everything negative about Trump,” Zuck.
“The FBI provided our excuse,” Zuck.
“This is like way worse than refusing to accept the results of an election. ”
Challenging an election is a right. Perjury is a crime – so YES, this is way worse.
Trump was found NOT to have raped Carroll – by a NY& Jury.
You do not “profit” from a loan. You MIGHT profit from the use you make of the loan, but not the loan itself.
You do not commit fraud by stating the value to you of something you are selling or mortgaging.
It is ALWAYS true that the value to the buyer or lendor is DIFFERENT from yours.
If you offer to buy my house for $100,000 and I say I will not take less than a million – that is not fraud.
If you agree to a million – that is not fraud.
If you later try to sell the place and can not get more than 100,000 that is not fraud.
If you get an oil change at your garage and they charge you $100 and you later find juiffy lube would have done it for 19,99 – that is not fraud.
@john say: if Lucretia’s idea of fraud is that Trump overvalued his property then every American homeowner and or realtor is guilty of fraud? Proof, are the values of our homes at selling in concert with the county assessors value? Will every homeowner be forced to sell at assessed value hereafter? Will every bank base it’s real estate loans on assessed value or market value without committing fraud? Will every realtor now be forced to mention to the seller don’t overvalue your home or you could be charged with fraud?
The deranged says the sabe are sick. That’s s laughing!!
Yeah, sure. But of course Willis, and James, and Bragg and that other dude that works for Garland all denied the results of the 2016 election; neither Biden nor Trump have been charged with rape, but Ashley’s diary is a lot more damning that the self-promoting circus of VaginaCatWoman. Face it, anybody with a sense of fairness know this is an unsustainable tyranny. My grand children knew the difference between Trump’s and Clinton’s honesty when they were 10 and 12. And Biden? What a joke.
Death, no, but it should be punishable by forfeiting her office. And yes, it is far worse than challenging the results of an election.
No, it’s not worse than rape, but there is literally no evidence whatsoever that Trump ever raped anyone; whereas there is significant evidence that both Biden and Clinton did rape women.
I think it likely that Trump has committed fraud, but not in the pathetic case brought against him in NY. I suspect he statute of limitations has already run on his last significant fraud. And the only person I’ve ever heard of keeping classified information in a bathroom is Hillary Clinton.
Assuming this case folds, can Trump sue to get his money back?
By all means please, excuse the crime that trump and all his cohorts committed because she had a romantic relationship with someone in her office. ReallY?
If the case is dropped that would only be because other prosecutors – pretty much everyone in the state, would not be wasting any effort on this turkey of a case.
But should you find in GA another DA as politically corrupt as Willis – they are free to prosecute the case.
Willis did NOT have “a romantic relationship with someone in her officie. ”
As a public official with a fiduciary responsibility to the public hired her paramour and paid him 3/4 of a million dollars.
and when caught lied about it under oath.
The real issue here isn’t that they had a relationship (although there are many issues with that, as well).
It’s that they lied, then lied about their lies, then lied about those lies, too. While playing the race card, etc.
The judge himself is compromised in this case. The whole thing reeks. Right out in the open, more and more.
Nope, the real issue here is democrat incompetence. The people that pushed the narrative and pushed the BS suit against trump and then put willis and her lover in the spotlight are PRIME examples of the terrible leadership of democrats. There is a very real reason that most all cities run by democrats for any length of time become ruined and they have expanded that to states and now they want the entire country.
The dems are simply terrible leaders leading hopeless romantics and morons.
By all means please, excuse the crime
You quick with the “crime” claim. Still waiting from a trial.
“IT IS CONCLUDED THAT VICTIMLESS CRIMES ARE, AT BEST, EXAMPLES OF THE ‘OVERREACH’ OF CRIMINAL LAW AND ARE, IN MANY RESPECTS, CONSTITUTIONALLY SUSPECT.”
– DOJ
________
8 Amendment
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
VICTIMLESS CRIMES – THE THRESHOLD QUESTION AND BEYOND
Annotation
ISSUES SURROUNDING THE RATIONALE AND CONSTITUTIONALITY OF VICTIMLESS CRIME STATUTES ARE EXAMINED.
Abstract
THE ‘HARM TO OTHERS’ VIEW OF THE PROPER CONNECTION BETWEEN LAW AND MORALS IS A BASIC CONCEPT IN THE CRITICISM OF VICTIMLESS CRIMES. THE DEBATE BETWEEN MORALIST AND UTILITARIAN CONCEPTS OF THE APPROPRIATENESS OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS RAISES CRITERIA WITH WHICH TO EXAMINE VICTIMLESS CRIMES, FORCING AN INQUIRY INTO PRECISELY WHAT BAD EFFECTS ARE FEARED, FOCUSING ATTENTION ON THE EFFECTS OF SUBJECTING THE CONDUCT IN QUESTION TO CRIMINAL PROHIBITION, AND RAISING THE QUESTION OF THE LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY AS DEFINED BY THE CONSTITUTION. THE ANALYSIS SUGGESTS THAT VICTIMLESS CRIME LAWS ACTUALLY CREATE VICTIMS BY FORCING CERTAIN ACTIVITIES TO BE CONDUCTED IN AN ATMOSPHERE CONDUCIVE TO SECONDARY CRIME. FURTHER OBJECTIONS TO VICTIMLESS CRIMES RELATE TO THEIR HIGH COST, I.E., TO THE FINANCIAL AND JUDICIAL BURDENS THEY IMPOSE, THE LOGISTICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS OF ENFORCEMENT, AND THE NATURE OF THE LAWS THEMSELVES. QUESTIONS RELATED TO THE LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY, THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, ASPECTS OF CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT, AND THE RIGHT TO TREATMENT GO BEYOND THE WISDOM OF VICTIMLESS CRIME STATUTES TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE LAWS. IT IS CONCLUDED THAT VICTIMLESS CRIMES ARE, AT BEST, EXAMPLES OF THE ‘OVERREACH’ OF CRIMINAL LAW AND ARE, IN MANY RESPECTS, CONSTITUTIONALLY SUSPECT. EXAMPLES OF ALTERNATIVES TO CRIMINALIZATION ARE CITED.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
UPDATE ON VICTIMLESS CRIME
Annotation
THIS COLLECTION OF FACT SHEETS IS DIRECTED AT PUBLICIZING THE NEED TO RELIEVE THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM OF VICTIMLESS CRIME THROUGH DECRIMINALIZATION.
Abstract
VICTIMLESS CRIMES INCLUDE DRUG ABUSE, PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS, PROSTITUTION, VAGRANCY, AND CERTAIN VOLUNTARY SEXUAL BEHAVIOR. MORE THAN ONE-THIRD OF ALL ARRESTS DURING 1975 WERE FOR VICTIMLESS CRIMES. A BREAKDOWN OF THAT CATEGORY AND THE NUMBER OF ARRESTS MADE FOR EACH CRIME ARE GIVEN. INDIVIDUAL FACT SHEETS ARE INCLUDED DEALING WITH PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS, GAMBLING, MARIJUANA USE, AND PROSTITUTION. THEY OUTLINE EFFORTS IN VARIOUS JURISDICTIONS TO DECRIMINALIZE EACH, RESULTS OF THESE EFFORTS, SUCH AS REDUCTION OF COURT COSTS AND POLICE MAN-HOURS INVOLVED IN MAKING SUCH ARRESTS, AND OTHER RELATED FACTS. STATEMENTS FROM THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY REGARDING DECRIMINALIZATION OF VICTIMLESS CRIMES ARE REPRODUCED, AS IS A NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE ON THE SUBJECT.
Bonnie shoved Clyde out of the car.
The sad thing is, that Fani could run for public office like Mayor, Governor or Congress, and probably win. She has all the right qualifications – she is black, female and a Democrat.
This might be a part of the problem across the country:
This was an excellent video. It pointed out that for the most part – whether left or right bias among more intelligent people was dramatically higher – because they are far better at rationalizing their views.
Also noted was that one of the most powerful insulators against logic being polluted by bias is a solid moral foundation.
This country but particularly the left has been actively losing – even destroying its moral foundations through most of my lifetime.
When Adam’s famously said that the constitution was for a religious and christian nation that it would work for no other that is because absent moral foundations, we can not govern ourselves.
One of the problems with the left is that morality can not be founded in feelings.
I am glad you like it! I am watching some other videos in that channel. And currently, this one, not in the series:
In other words, providing the vote to the unqualified and unsuccessful poor with no will of their own, nonfamilial and otherwise unassimilable foreigners, and incoherent and hysterical women was a subjective, irrational, and deleterious indulgence that requires immediate remediation.
While this is interesting – this problem was resolved before Leis in many way long before lewis.
You do not need objective truth to reject the nonsense of he moment.
Lets presume that we do not accept gravity as objective truth.
We still live on a world where the probability that if you jump up, you will come back down is as near certain as we can get.
The entirely of modern advanced physics rests on probability. Even when we can not know something absolutely.
We can still know something – often to an incredibly high degree of probability.
Further again in the real world – and in modern physics What is probably true and what is probably not are all interconnected.
We can not reject the probability that Gravity is true without rejecting nearly everything that depends on gravity.
Nor can we accept something as likely true without rejecting everything that conflicts with that.
Even as we go beyond more concrete propositions – like gravity, even if we shift to things like values and preferences – things that are inarguably not demonstrably true or false – our values and preferences still have unavoidable consequences.
A prior recent article of Turley’s addressed a professors sarcastic dating advice to students.
But ignoring the specific advice, it is unarguable that younger generations are suffering from dramatically higher anxiety and depression. That they are having serious problems forming romantic attachments.
These are among the many consequences of the values and or preferences that they have adopted.
You and I can debate whether there are only two sexes, or the liberty people have chosing their identity.
But the FACT is that the values and/or preferences of those on the left with regard to those and other things have left them anxious, depressed, and far less able to form long term stable relationships.
Just look at the issues regarding pronouns.
I personally have serious problems remembering peoples names.
Throughout my life I have depended on pronouns to deal with the anxiety of engaging with(or about) a person whose name I can not recall. But the left has converted pronouns into essentially an independent alternate system of names.
I can deal with a binary choice between he/she and given visual clues in the past get that right 99,999% of the time.
Not today. I can not get he/she correct to a reasonable probability when dealing with the woke.
Having dozens of genders returns me to the same problem that I have with names – only arguably worse.
Calling someone by the wrong name is embarrassing. Calling someone by the wrong pronouns today is a far more significant faux paux and can get you shunned.
Of course we have a generation of anxious and depressed kids. Thy have created a universe for themselves with landmines everywhere.
My point is that even where we can not establish objective truth. Even where it is possible to argue that some proposition is a fungible value that does not rest in any truth objective or otherwise. some value systems work and others do not, and all have consequences.
We can not just change values willie nilly and expect that there will be no consequences.
I would note that we do change values as well as our understanding of what is to a high degree of certainty true over time.
But mostly we do so slowly and through trial and error.
Why ? Because whatever may be perceived to be wrong with the prior values – however imperfect they were, they still WORKED.
Even going back to the evils of american slavery or european colonialism. For all the flaws these systems might have have they were superior to whatever preceded them and they were definitely superior to anarchy.
The process of establishing probabilistic correct truth, and of gradually revising our values has over the history of humanity lead to ever rising standards of living. But the left is trying to change nearly everything over night relying on emotion rather than logic, or even trial and error – and as a result THEIR OWN WORLD is coming apart at the seems.
Most change is NOT good – it is actually bad – that is why we proceed slowly by trial and error, and with a great deal of thought.
If we only change a few things at a time – we can easily tell whether the change was net positive or negative., and revise accordingly.
If we change everything all at once, we have anarchy, so it should be no surprise that we see chaos, anxiety and depression.
Sorry, Kamala has a lock on that qualification.
I would pay to go see her on the comedy circuit.
She’s the perfect comedian.
She stands there with a look on her face that suggests she’s sane and serious, while she waxes incoherent.
She’s absolutely hilarious.
Fani, who was elected to prosecute criminals, shares a trait common to the criminal element (and little children): the belief that the wrongfulness of their behavior can be rationalized away to others as effectively as it has to themselves.
As the great connoisseur of human behavior George Costanza famously said, “It’s not a lie if you believe it.”
And Fani believes she’s not a crook.
A single person’s love life is their freedom to pursue. You want this to be illegal? Just in specific cases?
Turley made it clear with Bill Clinton, his love life was an impeachment offense. Trump on the other hand can do anything, and Turley just feels like it’s not enough.
This is out of context because times have changes, anyway, Clinton was impeached because he committed perjury.
Imagine that Fish Wings et al., the deniers of facts, are allowed to vote.
The direct and mortal enemies of the American thesis of Freedom and Self-Reliance, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, actual Americans, and America are allowed to vote.
Sometimes you gotta say, What The —-?
What the — is going on in this once-free, once-great nation.
Clinton lying under oath about he SEX life, as well as trying to get witnesses to lie – is the impeachable offense.
Nor was clinton accused of something that had happened 30 years previous with absolutely no evidence.
Lewensky kept the “blue dress”.
Clinton’s conduct with Lewinsky is worse even than Willis’s.
It is arguable that Willis and Wade might have a romantic relationship.
Bill Clinton was after a Blow Job – not romance.
There was a much greater disparity in power between Clinton and Lewensky.
There was not the commingling of finances.
With respect to Trump – do you have even the weakest allegation of sexual conduct with someone under his employ While President ?
Even the E Jean Carroll nonsense – according to Carroll was between two random consenting adults on the street.
Carrol was NOT Trump’s employee and most deffinitiely not a {PUBLIC employee under his supervision.
Carrol was not providing Trump kickbacks from the money he was paying her.
The closer parallel to Willis is the Tara Read accusations against Biden. He was a public official and she was on his government staff.
Most (not all) of the allegations against Clinton involve public employer employee relationships.
Private employers can legally have romantic relations with employees – but that introduces a risk of sexual harassment charges, so it is generally not done. Nor do things go well when the relationship ends.
But Public officers engage in possible public corruption when they have romantic relations with employees./
That was about thirty years ago, so I can’t really remember what, if anything, Professor Turley was saying. Can you give us some references? Or did you just pull that out of your ass?
It is not illegal or immoral or unethical to be in love. It is immoral and unethical and in some cases illegal for those with power over others – especially public power to do so with respect to people they are in relations with.
Willis’s relationship to Wade was no one else in the world’s business – until she hired someone she had a romantic relationship with.
The big deal BTW is not that the relationship predates the hiring – the public ethical problem exists regardless.
The big deal about the relationship predating Wades hiring is that the both lied under oath about that.
If the relationship predated this case – Willis could not hire Wade. If the relationship developed after the start of the case – Willis was required to end the relationship OR end Wades employment.
Other evidence demonstrates WHY we do not allow such employment. There is strong evidence that Willis personally benefitted from the funds she paid to someone in here employ.
That is a problem – whether there is a romantic relationship or not – but it is more common – when there is.
Further Willis and Wade had to have been aware that if this came to light – it would look bad.
Willis’s claim that she repaid Wade in cash is implausible.
The burden for proving cash payments is on the person making the payment – because the person receiving gthe money can not prove thery did not receive money.
Willis is free to repay Wade in cash. She is not free to not have the financial records to establish that repayment did not occur.
The IRS is not going to allow you to deduct your unreimbursed business travel expenses from your taxes if you do not have records/
They do not (mostly) care if you paid in cash. If you do not have records the expense will be presumed to not exist, to be disallowed, and you likely will face charges for tax fraud.
Seems that one of them was single anyway.
Someone’s love life is not the topic. Nepotism of those in high office is the topic.
Are you talking about Jared and Ivanka again? But it was only $2 billion, what is the big deal anyway? Oh that’s right, they got the $2 billion after trump left office.
A single person’s love life is their freedom to pursue. You want this to be illegal?
The problem is lying in court documents and sworn testimony.
Lying to a Judge? You want this to be a crime?
The problem with Trump’s thinking is that it is hopelessly solipsistic. In his ego-inflated mind, a personal indiscretion on the part of his legal adversary exonerates his attempt to overthrow the Constitutional transition of Presidential power to the winner of the 2020 election. This weighing of misconducts in his own favor obliterates all sense of proportionality. You never want a person so consumed with self-interest put in charge of government, because he puts his own interest above that of the public. He’s doing it now now trying to interfere with tighter controls at the border – he’d prefer allowing in terrorists so that he can blame their atrocities on Biden — preventing the atrocities is secondary to his larger goal of amassing power.
Lies, lies and more lies. What are your trusted fake news sources? LOL.
Biden tells us that Trump wants the border chaos so he can use it as a weapon against Democrats. That is a lie. Biden has released a new campaign video with Obama and Pelosi standing on either side of him. In it, Biden says “Trump told us all to inject bleach” into our arms….that is a lie.
Biden regularly repeats this Big Lie: “Trump said there were fine people on both sides” in Charlottesville.
Whatever happened to the armies of Fact Checkers?
Most any sentence that starts with Biden or democrats, ends with a lie.
It is increasingly unecescary to even read what is said.
The Bleach story is not exactly a lie – it is just grossly missreprented.
Any oxidizing agent is a “bleach”. There was a treatment used by a doctor that involve recirculating a patients blood – like dialysis, with the blood being “bleached” outside the body. This was effective – but complicated.
It did NOT involve injecting clorox into your body.
Regardless, if this is a campaign add – it is stupid.
It is common for those on the left to expect others to beleive ludicrously stupid misrepresentations.
But most of us are long past accepting what Obama, Pelosi and Biden say at face value.
If this is what Democrats think is going to be an effective add. go for it. Given the election to Trump.
“You never want a person so consumed with self-interest put in charge of government…”
Right, the better choice is to put a corrupt dementia patient bought and paid for by the Chinese Communist Party in charge of government.
You have no idea what’s in Trump’s mind, nor do you know much about the Constitution. Democrats have corrupted government to the point we no longer have a Republic. The Constitution’s purpose is to weaken government by preventing it from being centralize. The Democrat’s goal is to centralize their power via government and destroying the constitution. This results in tyranny. Your premise is based on a false narrative which is a nice way of say a lie. You’ve have described the actions of Democrats, not Trump. Don’t you know that the border is wide open right now? You are incredibly assumptive and uninformed. Sad to see someone believing so many lies.
you are totally delusional, which is to say, you are in the mainstream of the Democrat(sic) Party
“The problem with Trump’s thinking ”
PbinCA, the current problem of millions of illegals, is a creation of the Biden Administration, the left, and the Democrats. All one has to do is look at the numbers. As soon as Biden invited illegal crossings by ending Trump’s policy, we ended up with millions. This policy is not a mistake. It was intentional.
To reverse what is happening today, all one has to do is return to Trump’s policies. Of course, if you like millions of illegal immigrants, including terrorists, criminals, druggies, and rapists, continue your support of Democrat policies.
” Willis notably stressed that she did nothing “illegal.” ”
Which means she did somethings “illegal”.
Deputy District Attorney Jeff DiSantis
Deputy District Attorney Jeff DiSantis
Deputy District Attorney Jeff DiSantis …
If Dr. Peter Navarro can be charged, prosecuted, shackled, strip searched, and now locked up in prison for a misdemeanor — then sure as hell this corrupt liar DA, who is now doubling down, with no remorse, should be investigated, disbarred, prosecuted and sent to prison for a long, long time. But hey it’s Fulton County, one of the most corrupt in the state. Even the Republican politicians running Georgia are failing to act. Are they corrupt and bought off? Sure looks that way. Are they being intimidated and refusing to take action so as not to expose their own corruption? Sure looks that way. Or is the Kemp, Carr cabal so consumed by Trump-hatred and TDS that they can’t even do their jobs? What is going on? What is Georgia AG Chris Carr’s excuse for failing to take swift and immediate action on this matter? It’s obvious.
This would be the same county and the same people who flipped GA for Biden in 2020.
Corrupt in one thing.
Probably corrupt in all things.
Afraid of being called raaaaaaaacist for prosecuting a black woman. That is verboten I think.
And for maximum impact, the FBI met Dr. Peter Navarro at DC National Airport, cuffed him and hauled him off a plane, to make the biggest public spectacle of his arrest and give him the full perp walk treatment, before his leg irons, strip search and some DC jail time. It’s disgusting what the FBI are doing.
Since “no one is above the law” we shall look forward to Hunter Biden’s public humiliation of being hauled off a plane, cuffed, shackled, and full orange jump suit perp walk off to prison. Contempt of Congress is a crime punishable by prison time! No matter how powerful a Democrat you are, right?
We shall look even more forward to corrupt Fani Willis being perp walked off to prison in her orange jump suit.
Chop chop all you democracy-saving, law enforcement people. We’re waiting…
The blatant double standard of justice in today’s America for the woke left will take care of Fanni Willis, whatever she says or does. It won’t matter. She will get a pass. She’s a Black Democrat.