For over a year, Special Counsel Jack Smith has made one element the overriding priority in his prosecution of former president Donald Trump: speed. Smith repeatedly moved to curtail Trump’s appellate rights and demand expedited appeals to try to secure a conviction before the election. In that effort, he found an equally motivated judge in U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, who virtually turned her court into a rocket docket to try Trump. Now, in a neck-breaking change of direction, Smith is trying to slow down Chutkan who appears again ready to pull out the stops in this case.
After the mandate in the case was returned to her, Judge Chutkan immediately resumed her high-speed scheduling to look at the pre-trial issues after the Court reversed her earlier rulings on the basis of presidential immunity.
The past problem with a court making speed the priority is that it does not allow much time to create a record. The remand will now require Judge Chutkan to do so on the question of what charges and evidence may be barred under the ruling in Trump v. United States.
As it has in the past, the Court adopted a three-tiered approach to presidential powers based on the source of a presidential action. Chief Justice John Roberts cited Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer, in which the court ruled against President Harry Truman’s takeover of steel mills.
In his famous concurrence to Youngstown, Justice Robert Jackson broke down the balance of executive and legislative authority between three types of actions. In the first, a president acts with express or implied authority from Congress. In the second, he acts where Congress is silent (“the zone of twilight” area). In the third, the president acts in defiance of Congress.
In this decision, the Court adopted a similar sliding scale. It held that presidents enjoy absolute immunity for actions that fall within their “exclusive sphere of constitutional authority” while they enjoy presumptive immunity for other official acts. They do not enjoy immunity for unofficial or private actions.
Only hours after receiving the mandate, Judge Chutkin scheduled an Aug. 16 conference to lay out the schedule and issues going forward. The former version of Jack Smith would have been delighted. He did not even see the need for the right for an en banc appeal in previously pushing for a pre-election trial.
Now, however, Smith is telling Judge Chutkin to slow down already.
Smith told the court that “The Government continues to assess the new precedent set forth last month in the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States. Although those consultations are well underway, the Government has not finalized its position on the most appropriate schedule for the parties to brief issues related to the decision.”
He has asked for a three-week delay to further consider what he wants to do. It is not clear if the press and pundits will now charge Smith with “slow walking” the case.
The question is whether Smith is considering a drastic move in light of the calendar and the ruling. There is, of course, always the possibility that he either throws in the towel or opts for a post-election trial. That would certainly go against the grain of Smith, who has always pushed both the law and the calendar to the breaking point. However, as some of us have been arguing for months, he may no longer view a trial as a plausible objective.
There is also the possibility that Smith will do something that some of us have discussed over the last year: pare down his case. Smith has always been undone by his appetite. As shown in his 8-0 reversal in his conviction of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, Smith has rarely shown moderation as a prosecutor.
His overloaded criminal complaints created this disaster for his team. In Florida, Smith unwisely loaded up the prosecution with controversial charges on the retention of classified material. It not only triggered difficult challenges but slowed the case to a crawl as the parties dealt with classification laws. Had he proceeded solely on obstruction charges, he might have secured his trial before the election (and before the recent ruling on immunity). Even if the reduced case was heard by the Court on immunity, an obstruction case would have been far stronger for Smith.
The same is true with the D.C. case. Smith loaded up the case to raise the January 6th speech and other issues. Most were unnecessary, but Smith used his press conference to denounce the January 6th riot.
A three-week delay will give Smith ample time (in addition to the weeks following the Supreme Court decision) to deliberate. However, it will take roughly a month off the calendar for just internal debate with the election only three months away.
So, even with a judge who appears chomping at the bit to resume the fast track to trial, Smith now wants more time. Even before this request, it was hard to see how a trial could be held before the election. Now it seems a virtual certainty that any trial will have to await the results of the election. As I wrote in 2023, the odds were against a federal trial before the election, which would convert the voters into the largest jury in history.
OT Free Speech under attack in NYC:
https://cleantechnica.com/2024/08/09/climate-activist-arrested-for-playing-his-cello-outside-citibank-faces-7-years-in-prison/
At least 3,700 people have participated in the nonviolent civil disobedience, repeatedly blockading the entrance to its global headquarters. More than 475 people, including faith leaders, scientists, and elders have been arrested while calling on Citibank to stop financing new coal, oil, and methane gas projects.
Civil disobedience is not free speech, you spastic idiot.
Your spastic idiot friend who wrote the article also claimed that the man was arrested for playing the cello. Clearly and obviously a lie.
We also see this “journalist’s” stupidity reflected in his/her use of the phrase “nonviolent civil disobedience”. Because all civil disobedience is non violent, by definition.
Did you finish your broccoli before you posted this nonsense, or will the orderly be along shortly to lead you back to your padded room?
The day David Benson is a professor is the day I’m a goddam astronaut. —Lt Dan
DDC — Did you bother to actually *read* the article? The man was playing his cello in the public park near the Citibank entrance.
Not blocking.
I pasted the fvcking clip from it ya spastic.
He was arrested for what, asshat?
What was the charge? Cello-ing?
Free speeching?
I already demonstrated that you and the articles author were being dishonest. Why would we believe he was arrested for playing his cello?
Rozendaal and Connon were first arrested on July 18 and charged with assault — falsely they say — against James Flynn, who is working with Citibank’s private security team.
I guess you didnt read the whole article.
To quote Chamberlain Haller
“We’re not about to change our judicial procedures because you happen to find yourself in the unique position of defending clients who say they didnt do it
He was arrested for assault, assclown, not for playing his cello.
How’s that tapioca pudding?
H2O — *You* didn’t read the entire article with comprehesion. This is a 2nd arrest while playing the cello.
Do all of you livbturds gas light with that comprehension horse shit? What is that? Did you learn that in debate class? Do your DNC daily emails call for that tactic? So he was arrested twice, so what? Help me comprehend lol.
Was the second arrest for violating his restraining order?
The day that David Benson is a professor is the day I’m a goddam astronaut. Lt Dan
We are looking into the matter and it will be addressed appropriately.” She can probably expect a nice bonus from the bank.
Sorry, I stopped reading after this vomit. Is this typical of the type of outlet you get your information from? I wouldn’t trust that a word this sycophant said is true. But hey, you do you and keep looking like a spastic idiot.
What, pray tell, was this clown arrested for the second time? I don’t care to read any more of that drivel.
Yes, she should get a bonus, because what she said was 100% correct. People going about their lawful business should have the right to use as much force as necessary, even deadly force, to get through picketers who deliberately block their way.
The only thing under attack around here is the truth
The article you lkink to is reflective of what is wrong with the news today.
While MIST if thge article seem to confirm your claim – that protestors were arrested for trheir excercise of free speech – the charges are not for free sppech violations,s. and even the proptestors admit they blcked the enterancve to private property for days.
So in the light most favorable to those charged there is atleast a minor crim
But the article mentions thjat the actual charges against the protestor are for assault – that is NOT a minor crime. The article blythly presumes that the accused did not assault anyone.
Criminal defendants are entitled to the presumption of innocence – in court.
But the media is suppose to be neutral – This peice is entirely one sided.
Regardless the defendant will get a trial in NYC for assault, at which the prosecution will get to make its case.
Assault is NOT playing the cello.
Assault is not free speech.
If I were on the Jury I would not compelling evidence to convict this person of assault.
At the same time the claim thjat he was arrested for free speech, for playing the cello is false.
That is not what he was arrested for or charged with.
I would further note that we have seen lots of these “green” protests globally.
They are NOT peaceful. They range from violent to merely obstructive, disorderly and destructive of property.
Again the charges in THIS instance have to be proven in court – but the argument that green protests are universally peaceful is garbage.
There is an actual excercise of free speech in these protests – and these protestrs can not be arrested for their speech – not even if Citibank is pissed.
But when the protests go beyond speech to trespass, assault, destruction of property, obstruction of the property of other – then they are crimes.
We nearly always mitigate vrimes that are part of the excercise of free speech and protest. It is common place for those charged with minor violations like disorderly conduct or tresspass, to have charges dropped or to receive minimal and suspended sentences.
It is even common place for more serious charges like assault to be plead down to to receive mitigated sentences.
That is appriate. But protest, the excise of free speech is not a blank slate to commit crimes.
Most of us would have little problems with that approach to J6. Charges like Tresspass should be dropped. They never should have been filed in the first place – Congress can not be “protected” from legitimate excercises of free speech, petitioning govenrment, protest
while in session.
Nor are peacefull efforts to “interfere” with congress such free speech sufficient for charges. The norm in such cases is protestors who try to chout doewn the actions of government (not private avctors) are physically removed by the police booked released and later the charges droppped.
It does not matter whether the protesters are for stop the steal or Stop Oil.
Those who physically resisted arrest generally do not have charges droped – though punishment is mitigated.
While those who do actual violence especially to those outside of government- like assault as alleged here are prosecuted but usally sentence are mitigated – at least for first offenders.
The video’s of J6 show thousands of people – nearly all of whom are peacefully protesting.
There are a few actual instances of property destruction. or initiating conflicts with law enforcement – These should be charged prosecuted with mitigated sentences.
I am not aware of a signel instance of arson, or assault of anyone other than law enforcement. I am not aware of a single instance of the use of a weapon – and very few instances of possession of a weapon.
Regardless the law enforcement objective regarding protests is to keep the peace and punish actual violence – not Punish people for their speech or their views.
Those like you CONSTANTLY argue that merely protesting to “stop the steel” is somehow itself a crime. That conpsiring to “stop the steal” is a serious crime – akin to sedition and rtreason – that is not only absolutely false but anti-american.
In this country protest is legal – even if those in power believe it is misguided. Even if protesters actually believe something wrong.
O am highly critical of prohamas protestors – supporting Hamas is actually supporting terroris and genocide.
But in this country we counter the ecxpression of repugnant views with more speech not ernforced silence.
I will repeatedly call out prohamas protesoters as the moral scum that they are – but I will defend their right to protest.
It is onlyu when those protests turn violent – destroying property arson, assault, Tresspass on private property that chargesd are appropriate and even then theser are generally to be mitigated as part of free speech.
But the report you cite LIES – these priotestors were not arrested for free speech, they were arrested for crimes – many of which were violent.
They are entitled to a presumption of innocence. They are not entitled to the press memory holing the actual charges,
Bull. There was no attack on free speech. This thug was arrested for violating a restraining order, exactly like a stalker or an abusive boyfriend.
And there is no right, EVER, to block a business’s entrance. That is not free speech, and if it were up to me it would be legal to drive a car through them, and if they die that’s their own fault.
It needs to be said again, just how EVIL both Joe and Jill Biden are.
These are bad people.
It needs to be said over and over and over.
Jack ASS Smith.
If, in the process, they consult with Andrew Weissman, it will become clear what’s afoot. A silk purse out of a sow’s ear indictment.
In that effort, he found an equally motivated judge in U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, who virtually turned her court into a rocket docket to try Trump.
Just south of Florida, another dictator has gotten his supreme court justices to issue edicts to hunt, capture and prosecute individuals who ran against him in his rigged election. Ernesto Maduro has put a bullseyes on those candidates who ran against him and got his “justices” at Venezuela’s highest court to write the orders.
The United States is just like Venezuela. Watch what happens when Democrats lose the election – they’ll rig the numbers just like Maduro
Venezuelan opposition candidate González won’t appear before court and questions election audit
https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-presidential-election-maduro-gonzalez-machado-court-3bfd3176646b0486fdefc0c60af0fbb8
Did the Roberts decision in Trump allow sitting Presidents to commit crimes in furtherance of their re-election campaigns, and then escape prosecution claiming running for re-election is an official duty of Office? I don’t think any Jury is going to buy this premise. A first-term President is competing against a non-President, and it goes against “free and fair elections” to give the incumbent criminal latitude not allowed for the challenger.
Roberts ignored this obvious dimension of first-term Presidents running for 2d terms. He ignored the context of the case under review to arrive at a standard more crafted for Presidents governing, not campaigning.
Therefore, I believe Smith should argue for a 2-phase trial, Phase I to have a Jury decide if the Trump’s attempts to remain in power after losing the post-election court cases actions were private vs. official governing actions. He has a strong case that these were private:
1) Presidents don’t get to commit crimes in pursuit of winning a 2nd term, because the President under Article I has no authority to extend his term in defiance of the electoral votes of the states.
2) The veil of secrecy Trump has attempted to protect betrays the actions as private
3) The use of non-governmental, personal lawyers and operatives (e.g. Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Steve Bannon, Bernie Kerik) distances the actions from official ones
4) The lack of WH record keeping pursuant to the actions paints them clearly as unofficial acts
5) The acts were in defiance of the Constitutional roadmap for Presidential succession — classifying them as official would negate the overriding force of that roadmap.
My hunch is that the Supreme Court, being elitists, would not trust a Jury to decide official vs. private action.
But that’s where legal decisions bearing on case evidence and facts belongs.
So Smith needs to create a showdown — and schedule a Phase I trial, where sufficient facts are established by Jury deliberation to classify the actions in question as private or official.
“Therefore I believe…”
This has already been clarified as the expected/planned approach, based on the remand. Why are you pretending it is your own brilliance that “believes” this?
Why, you ask? Because these leftists Marxists are 100% certain in their beliefs that they are correct and everyone else is wrong. I stopped reading their BS a long time ago.
Professor Turley,
Your support for Trump v. United States appears deeply at odds with your previous writings and expert Congressional testimony. Previously, see for example, your 2013 Hearing related to the limits of prosecutorial discretion and DACA, you referenced Madison’s warning in Federalist No. 51 about the encroachment of Executive Power on the legislative function of Congress. You noted, “If a President can unilaterally change the meaning of laws in substantial ways or refuse to enforce them, it takes off line that very thing that stabilizes our system.”
With respect to nonenforcement orders like DACA, you said that “[i]t is not prosecutorial discretion to go into a law and say an entire category of people will no longer be subject to the law. That is a legislative decision. Prosecutorial discretion is a case-by-case decision that is made by the Department of Justice. When the Department of Justice starts to say we are going to extend that to whole sections of laws, then they are engaging in a legislative act, not an act of prosecutorial discretion.”
With Trump v. United States, the Roberts Court just made an entire category of people (Presidents) no longer subject to the Legislative Branch and its ability to make law. Immunizing, a priori, all laws from applying to the President when the President performs an official act, and at least presumptively (but potentially also absolutely) immunizing Presidents from these laws when it is a non-core act seems to be precisely the type of encroachment by the Judicial Branch on the Legislative Branch that Madison warned us about. Why the sudden change of heart?
For reference, see: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-113hhrg85762/html/CHRG-113hhrg85762.htm.
Barrett’s application of separation of powers doctrine would appear to be a much better method for handling this issue.
Anonymous – Virtually all public officials are given immunity of some kind, from policemen and judges , to Congressmen, to Supreme Court justices. The reason is obvious: they can’t do their jobs if they are continually subject to mertiless claims of the kind that have been brought against Donald Trump. The question is not whether immunity should be recognized, but rather what is the shape of that immunity. Reasonable minds (not those of American leftists, obviously) can disagree on the scope of that immunity, but, because of the lawfare campaign against Trump, we must now develop the outlines of that protection.
Don’t feed the troll
No problem with statutory immunity. Qualified immunity is completely judged made law however. Not a fan of judicial activism. If immunity is desirable, then why shouldn’t Congress be entrusted to pass the law?
“subject to the Legislative Branch”? Are you insane? 3 branches of a co-equal government do not make for subservience of one over the other.
Anoni’s Error #1″With Trump v. United States, the Roberts Court just made an entire category of people (Presidents) no longer subject to the Legislative Branch and its ability to make law.”
Anoni’s Erro #2 “Barrett’s application of separation of powers doctrine”
We should not forget that all the leftist on this blog said that Dementia Joe was just fine and that he was going to beat Trump in a landslide in 2024. Liars gonna lie and snakes gonna bite.
@Thinkitthrough
Yes, but you’d better believe every single 18 year-old is going to vote this year, and the vast majority of them *want* communism, because they so grossly and tragically misunderstand it. The time for armchair analysis is kinda done.
The latest from Harris. We need to reduce population to save the environment. She must believe that to do that a one child policy will be required by legislation. Perhaps just like in Communist China fines will be in order. Less young people working means lower contributions to Social Security and Medicare. The Chinese figured it out and are now encouraging larger families. But DumbKamala remains DumbKamala. It’s apparent that she’s never heard of the generation promise thats built on the idea that parents promise to provide for the young when they are young and the young promise to provide for the old when they are old. She believes that the socialist government will just get the money out of thin air. Herein lies the hole in the socialist philosophy and Kamala Harris’ brain. There was once a woman who thinks like Kamala who believed that the population of black people should be controlled for the higher good. Her name was Margaret Sanger. Eugenics is still alive within the Democratic Party.
The libturds on this site never learn. They say stupid shit every day about this and that is going to happen and they are ALWAYS wrong.
Trump was supposed to be in a Georgia prison by now
Trump was supposed to have been 14A’d by now
Hunter wasn’t going to be convicted
And my favorite, the stupidity slobbered repeatedly by Dennis the Draft Dodger, Gigi the Pathological LIAR, Fishysmell, Sammy Metamucil, Svelaz-George, and the booger eating drunktard known as Lawn Boy:
Biden is going to win in a landslide!
If these spastic idiots had one iota of shame, or an ounce of self respect, they would have slithered away many moons ago.
With all the articles written regarding the fine points about Jack Smith’s actions as Special Counsel, NOT ONCE has there been mention that Jack Smith (like Harris) has a record of their behavior before their current political position they were chosen to fill.
In Jack Smith’s case, we have his record from the 2012 Democrat reelection campaign, when Obama/Biden sent him from their DoJ to first tell Louis Lerner that she could shut down GOP voter advocacy groups “for investigation” until after the election.
And parallel to doing that during the 2012 election season, Jack Smith targeting, investigated, and prosecuted the GOP potential candidate Obama/Biden feared most: Governor Bob McDonnell. And in order to do that, Jack Smith did in that 2012 election season, what he is repeating doing to Trump what he did to McDonnell in that prosecution: judge shopping, violating DoJ prosecution rules, re-imagining and reinventing legislation, adding his own personal clauses to existing laws, “leaks”, etc.
We’re supposed to ignore the fact that Lisa Monaco as Garland’s Assistant Attorney General (who worked with Smith in his 2012 political prosecutions) picked Smith as an “independent, unbiased Special Counsel with no ties to the DoJ who appointed him” – while SCOTUS threw out his prosecution of Governor McDonnell. In a unanimous decision where their decision calls Jack Smith a threat to our democracy.
Shouldn’t the major question be: “With Jack Smith’s record of what he did in 2012 during the election campaign, as an Obama/Biden DoJ prosecutor, who the hell can defend him being chosen to be an unbiased, impartial prosecutor with no ties to the DoJ who selected him?”
Why don’t Jack Smith’s previous record from his actions during the 2012 campaign ever come up?
AIRBORNE: This is a fabulous comment that should be shouted from the rooftops!!
THANK YOU FOR THE REMINDERS!!
“Why don’t Jack Smith’s previous record from his actions during the 2012 campaign ever come up?”
Because it’s irrelevant.
The Deep State already achieved it’s desired goal. The election is over. Trump lost. Harris won in a landslide. Official results will be declared on November 6th. Jack Smith has no need to continue with these political trials.
After watching this political square up with much consternation it came to me. Conservatives want everyone to excel to their utmost potential. They want to fund programs that help people achieve their dreams. Democrats (Communists) want everyone to fail on the individual level, they want you dependent upon them. This gives them power. This election is the turning point, the People have been lied to, cheated, persecuted, imprisoned and mislead. There are those among us that will never understand what our forefathers provided us. They have been subject to the propaganda for too long.
Give me Liberty or give me Death , are you now beginning to understand ?!
The Constitution provides maximal freedom to individuals while that document severely limits and restricts government.
Article 1, Section 8.
Congress has the power to tax for ONLY debt, defense and “general Welfare,” aka basic infrastructure – general is all, or the whole, not one, some, or a few.
Congress has the power to regulate only the value of money, commerce among nations, States, and Indian tribes, and land and naval Forces.
Democrats believe that governments exist to rule the people.
Conservatives believe that governments exist to serve the people.
Everything else is just variations on their respective themes.
Hundred Years’ War
French officials deployed a form of lawfare in the lead-up to the Hundred Years’ War, according to historians Iskander Rehman and David Green.[8][9] Rehman states:[8]
“In the fraught decades leading up the Hundred Years War, French officials deployed their expertise in the arcane intricacies of feudal law to continuously undermine Plantagenet (English) authority over their continental territories, ‘clogging up administrative processes’, ‘interfering with fiscal activities’ and burying English officials under a deluge of legal cases.”
From Iskander Rehman, Planning for Protraction
– Wikipedia
______________
When do Smith and Chutkan pay the price for perfidious and anti-American malicious prosecution as lawfare, not justice?
Why doesn’t the RNC have a competent and aggressive lawfare department to match the corrupt and ineligible foreign influence and agency of the enemy, Obama and the communists (liberals, progressives, socialists, democrats, RINOs, AINOs)?
Now you know why “natural born citizen” was defined by Vattel in 1758 as a candidate with two citizen-parents, including a citizen-father, and why Jay, Washington, the Founders, and the Framers employed that definition to preclude foreigners from the office of commander-in-chief and undue foreign influence.
Ben Franklin et al. gave Americans freedom—freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, freedom of private property, freedom to bear arms, freedom of swift justice by jury, freedom of revolution, freedom of secession, free enterprise, free markets, and free white person(s)—the letter and spirit of the Founders, their Constitution, and their Naturalization Acts; their nation, their law, their people.
The singular American failure is the judicial branch, with emphasis on the Supreme Court.
George – Thank you for reminding us of the 100 years war. We tend to forget it.
Now you know why “natural born citizen” was defined by Vattel in 1758 as a candidate with two citizen-parents, including a citizen-father, and why Jay, Washington, the Founders, and the Framers employed that definition
No, they did not. Most of them were completely unfamiliar with that “definition”, and there is not a shred of evidence that even those who had heard of it agreed with it.
Just wait until JOE BIDEN makes an appearance at the convention! The morons will react as if he is a retired elder statesman and a respected elder but it may sink trough to the masses that the demented idiot is STILL PRESIDENT! It will be especially problematic if it is during the convention that Iran decides to either attack Israel or have their puppets in Lebanon do it.
WHAT DID HARRIS KNOW AND WHEN DID SHE KNOW IT?!?!?!?
Well…it would still be better than Trumps disastrous press conference. He looked scared and confused and angry and babbled on and on about crowd sizes and being better than MLK.
He seems to be making dumber and dumber decisions because he’s no longer getting the attention he loves. Harris and Walz are stealing the spotlight and he’s not handling it well.
So answering questions for an hour as opposed to 77 seconds is now a sign of being scared? I would think the candidate only replying for a minute is the scared on.
As far as decision go Harris made ONE decision and it was Tim “commie, lying, pedophile, china loving, troop screwing, antifa appeasing” Walz.
Trump didn’t ‘answer’ questions. He lied intensely when they were posed to him…, not to mention exhibiting a boat load of cognitive impairment during his extreme deflections.
where is the info on him being a pedophile (other than that he is a prog/left jihadist)
“Trump didn’t ‘answer’ questions.”
Correct – that is normal.
The press goes how are you going to explain to poor black familes your tax cuts for the rich, and Trump answers “My polices improved the household incvome of black families by 3500/yr”
He did not answer the specific question asked – but he did answer why blacks should vote for him.
That is normal politics – Trump is quite good at it.
Harris is LOUSY
Harris was asked how she can work for Biden given that she called him a racist in the debates.
He answer “it was a debate” That is probably the truth, and it says that Harris is a liar.
You have asked similar questions of Vance – he must explain how he is running with Trump when he called him a nazi before.
He has successfully answered that.
Harris can not manage a minute of questions Trump manages an hour
“He lied intensely when they were posed to him”
He exagerated a little – but his answers are fundimentally correct.
iIf you want lies – try Harris or Walz.
No boys can not be girls,
No going to italy is not going to afghanistan, no quitting just before you have to get on the plane to Iraq is not serving in combat.
No socialism is NOT just being neighborly.
No riots and Arson are not an appropriate response to 400 years of being black.
No letting rioters riot and destroy their communities for decades to come was NOT the right response.
No boys do not need tampons.
No the police do not need defunded.
No bidenomics is not working.
No Trump did not cause all the problems you inflicted on yourself.
“not to mention exhibiting a boat load of cognitive impairment during his extreme deflections.”
ROFL.
Trump does better at a press conference than Kackling Kamala.
No one thinks Harris is demented – just stupid.
Trump speaks for Hours on end without a teleprompter – he even gets criticized because his prepared speeches are more focused and more poetic than his adlibs – which are often good, but do not read as well. Trump connects with crowds or with people as individuals – not academics.
He answers questions from hostile reporters for an hour at a time. Harris is now up to a minute.
The ability to think on your feet is at the top of the list of functioning at very high cognative performance.
The gibberish from Krazy Kamala is not demensia – but it is inability to think on your feet.
Is Hillery said – if the call comes at 3am – who do you want – Kackling Kamala who has not done anything of consequence in her life.
Or someone who has dealt with numrous crisises.
Kamala has made ONE decision on her own as presidential candidate – Selecting Walz – and look how badly that turned out ?
“That is probably the truth, and it says that Harris is a liar.”
It was a debate, how is that not the truth?
“Harris can not manage a minute of questions Trump manages an hour”
And in that hour he did more damage to his campaign and making nonsense for an hour is not good strategy.
John, even your desperation is showing. Ignorance is indeed bliss in your world. There’s still time for Trump to make things worse for himself.
Thats 12 times in 4 days. You sound really really desperate
“That is probably the truth, and it says that Harris is a liar.”
It was a debate, how is that not the truth?
Lmao this is the spastic idiot that says other people have reading comprehension issues.
What he was saying is that she didn’t believe it when she said it at the debate, which makes her a liar
And makes you a dunce
Not one citizen of these United States, nor the military, should allow THIS incompetent fraud anywhere near the presidency. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iMYlJqsDcg
“So I called him a racist, but I didn’t MEAN it, silly, it was just a debate, hehehehehe, it was a debate, hehehehe.”
How did selecting Walz turn out? According to “Newsweek”:
“Minnesota Governor Tim Walz’s approval rating has surged since he was announced as Vice President Kamala Harris’ running mate, while Republican Donald Trump’s pick, Ohio Senator JD Vance, has seen his fall, according to a poll.
A YouGov survey conducted on August 8, two days after Harris announced Walz as her vice presidential pick, found the governor with a net favorability rating of +11. That was up from a +1 net favorability in another YouGov survey conducted in late July.
The Republican’s net favorability was -6 in a YouGov survey conducted between July 15 and July 19. It dropped to -9 in another survey conducted between July 22 and July 25.”
Most of America does not live in the MAGA media bubble that lies constantly about Harris and Walz. And, nothing you say about Trump’s performance is true. He just trots out the usual vaudeville act schtick and lies.
“Most of America does not live in the MAGA media bubble that lies constantly about Harris and Walz.”
Actually “most of America” does not live in your bubble of Pravda-level propaganda, lies, & misinformation. YOU are the one being played for a fool. That’s why Democrats are the party of CENSORSHIP. The ‘Truth’ cannot co-exist with Democrat policies. They have to LIE to their voters. That’s why you were all shocked by Hillary losing in 2016. The media LIES TO YOU on behalf of the Democrat party.
VDH puts it clearly:
The real Harris-Walz campaign messaging:
‘In 2024 we have to lie and mislead you about who we are and what we did, so that in 2025 we can govern you in ways you will not like.’
Tampon Tim is a blue falcon. Google it at your own risk.
Yes, an hour of rambling and incoherent answered IS bad. It’s not just the answers it’s his expressions and how uncomfortable he looked when asked “stupid” questions.
You know Trump praised Tim Walz, right?
He also trusted Fauci. Nobody’s perfect.
“You know Trump praised Tim Walz, right?”
Must you prove yourself a spastic idiot every day?
You know Kamakameleon called Joe a racist and misogynist, right?
Well, we now know that Svelaz didnt watch the presser and got his opinion from Rachel Maddow. His denial of reality starts to sound more and more like Gigi every day.
He also doesnt realize how pathetic he sounds feeling he needs to characterize everything according to his ignorant and ill informed opinions.
Let me tell you how it really is—Svelaz the pathetic sycophant
Biden will winSvelaz the pathetic sycophant, 6 weeks ago.
I watched the whole thing. Trump was a mess. That’s what everyone is talking about how bad it was.
You’re not getting any traction with your personal attacks. You’re just making yourself look more desperate.
Who cares what happened 6 weeks ago. Biden is no longer running. Trump didn’t want Biden to drop out because he was easy to deal with. Now he has to actually do the work of appealing to voters, not just hurling insults and to date he’s been an incoherent mess and bumbling around trying to find ways to insult instead of arguing on policy. He’s more concerned about the lack of attention and whining about crowd sizes. His poll numbers are shrinking and Harris is getting all the attention. Two things Trump can’t seem to handle well and it shows. The more panicked he gets the stupider the decisions he makes.
“Who cares what happened 6 weeks ago” –George
Yet, how many times have you brought up things from farther back than that?
“to date he’s been an incoherent mess and bumbling around
trying to find ways to insult instead of arguing on policy”
Pretty good description of your own comments, George.
Good for you to begin to see through your own BS.
“Who cares what happened 6 weeks ago”
I guess that means, “6 weeks, hell i can make an ass of myself every day”
Who cares that I was proven full of shit 46 times over the last 3 months?
—-Svelaz the spastic idiot
Why is it that Svelaz George refuses to answer 2 simple questions.
How long have you been commenting on this blog?
What name were you using before “George”?
I think Trump was surpised by the Choice of Walz and caught somewhat flatfooted.
But only because Walz was SO BAD a choice that Trump did not expect it.
You listed many Walz problems. The stolen valor thing is huge.
Had Walz retired before orders to deploy to Iraq. had he NOYT made stupid claims such as that he retired as a CSM, or that he was din combat or that he was even in a combat zone, He would be fine – 20 years service is worthy.
But as the West Point motto goes – cadets do not lie or tolerate those who do.
McCaine was a disaster at the Naval Accademy – he finished with the historically worst record EVER. He was caught repeatedly crossing the line. But he NEVER lied – until he was a senator.
“But only because Walz was SO BAD a choice that Trump did not expect it.”
Huh, no. It was because Trump expected Harris would pick Shapiro because he was Jewish. Trump was ready to attack Shapiro but as you said, got caught flat footed and has not been able to mount an effective attack on Harris/Walz.
The stolen Valor claim is weak. It doesn’t change the fact that Trump can’t find an effective strategy against Harris that doesn’t involve hurling insults and sexism. Most Trump supporters went full racist and misogynist as I predicted and that is work in against Trump. Speaker Johnson even implored fellow republicans to refrain from making racist attacks. Of course they ignored him.
“The stolen Valor claim is weak.”
It should be weak to you, you spastic idiot. You have no valor to steal. Therefore, you should have no opinion about it one way or another.
However, those of us with valor, conservative and liberal, take it seriously. We dont expect you to, because you’re a douchebag who doesnt have a clue what it means to serve and sacrifice
So feel free to use this opportunity to exhibit one iota of class, and stfu about it.
He looked scared and confused and angry and babbled on and on about crowd sizes and being better than MLK.
Remember just a week ago, when the very same George was announcing that Trump was too scared to agree to debate George’s candidate of choice, Round Heels Harris?
Has George recanted that pronouncement now that Trump has announced THREE debate dates he wants for debating Round Heels Harris – and Harris is STILL Hiding In The Biden Official Campaign Basement, avoiding speaking to the same media as Trump and Vance do… all while showing she’s fearful of debating Trump?
George, is your champion Round Heels Harris hiding in Biden’s 2020 Campaign Basement because she can’t speak to either the news media or debate Trump if she can’t do it with a teleprompter?
As far as Constitutional Democrat Racists go, George’s pronouncements of “fact” seem a little bit sketchy and they don’t age well for more than a day or two.
Airborne Dog, Huh?
Trump changed his mind once he realized Harris is gaining popularity and is leading in the polls. Harris is in a position to negotiate. Trump isn’t. Trump will look stupid trying to set the rules after backing away from his agreement with Biden.
He’s not in a good position and after two disastrous events, the interview with the NABJ and his press conference yesterday he needs to change course.
Harris and waltz are having big rallies and Trump clearly is upset that he is not getting the attention he thinks he deserves. He’s panicking.
The presser yesterday was a huge success, reflected in the polls today, dum dum
“Harris and waltz are having big rallies”
Those were free concerts, already scheduled, that Harris glommed on to.
When she got on stage people started walking OUT.
WTF dude?
Trump looked relaxed and as if he was enjoying it.
Could you be anymore Gigi-like?
I reject your reality and substitute my ownSvelaz the spastic idiot
Trump said his elipsis rally on J6 was as big as MLK’s in 1963 – purportedly MLK had 350K people.
According to the Press Trump had 53K. But Trump is loosely correct – photos of the events look very similar.
Further therre is no official count for either. No one was doing any counting in 1963 and in 2020 they do estimates based on the area occuupierd – which was very similar.
I doubt Trump had 250K people at J6. But given that 5-6K went to the capitol and that was a small percent of the total – I doubt he had only 50K. I also doubt MLK had 250K.
But does it actually matter ? The Trump crowd was enormous on J6, It is likely that Every time Trump estimates his crowdsize he is off by a factor of 2 or more. But there is ZERO doubt that Trump attracts large crowds. and that pretty much no one else in politics can manage crowds half his size. Harris is doing much better than Biden – but Sorry – her crowds are embarrassingly small.
I would further note – that while Trump is easily goaded into bragging about his crowds – Trump did not create this issue – The left does.
The press asks unimportant questions and then tries to make hay with Trump’s ansewers.
Trump;s supporters do not take him litterally – he did not have 250K people on J6. But they do take them seriously – he had one h311 of a lot of people. Harris managed between 1/3 and 1/2 the crowdsize Trump did in Atlanta, despite the fact that Atlanta is a major black democrat city, and she brough t in an alist rapper, and paid people to attend.
Does it matter ? Not as much as You or the left think.
But it is important – because like exit polls it is a 3rd party check on Election results.
Another reason mailin voting has to go – there is no sanity check provided by exit polls.
What is Jack Smith but a Court Jester, amusingly stumbling about with antics of twisted legal interpretations and desperation to please the lefts royalty?
Governor Tim Walz’s military history and his departure from service has come into question. Not knowing the actual facts leads me to ask one question, what the terms of his last reenlistment were. If he had the right to retire under his last enlistment term I have no qualms, but I do with the lack of honor he showed to those who relied on him as a leader.
He had that right.
However, to accept a promotion in Rank to E-9, he would have had to extend his enlistment for a minimum TIS after promotion.
He instead opted to retire rather than be deployed. It was his right to do so.
Claiming to have retired as an E-9 is what he had no right to do. In fact, if he posted on his website while running for Congress that he was an E-9, prior to leaving the service, that would be punishable under the UCMJ.
The real issue was that he left his command with no CMS, just before deployed to a war zone. While he was certainly within his right to do so, rather than extend his enlistment, many in his command were, unsurprisingly, not too apprecative.
The dude is a douchebag, regardless.
Being a coward is not necessarily a crime. But you’re still a coward.
I served for 22 years with distinction, thru 3 wars. I have both fired and been fired at.
How about you, booger eating drunktard coward? Day drinking and day trading doesn’t hold much valor, little kunt.
Huh?
I didnt realize “you’re” was third person. Sorry.
Good call. I should have said “…one is…” rather than “…you’re a…”
I’ll watch that in the future.
He was in the NG for 24 years and his highest award was the Army Commendation medal! Privates get that award for showing up at the motor pool…..
It would be helpful to see his DD214.
24 years of very partial and limited service. Indeed, his “24 years” entailed fewer total days of service than Vance’s 4 years in Iraq. But that’s math, and leftists don’t do math. It’s racis.
I am no apologist for that douchebag, but I’m sorry, thats not true. How long did you serve and what branch?
smart, informed Americans know what she and walz are, but, unfortunately, people who demand free stuff for their votes (and that includes dead and illegal people) are in a greater number. We allowed prog/left demographic shifts to undo our nation.
Kamala finally answered a question yesterday and said “yes” but journalists are still trying to figure out which question she was answering too.
Donald Trump in becoming an increasingly low consideration in the election outcome, but better not take a chance and keep Smith’s dossier alive. I think is what we can read in this silence.
The Deep State after testing Trump with a fake assassination attempt, imposing JD Vance as his running mate, have determined that he still offers too much resistance and is too volitional; therefore the DP is preparing for another form of soft Coup d’État by letting the Congress’s House choose the President: Kamala Harris, and the Senate choose the VP: JD Vance. It’s a slam dunk for the Deep State. They probably used their “power” of suggestion to push Kamala towards Walz knowing he would be an impediment in getting the required 270 Electoral College Votes needed to get the ticket elected.
There is an interesting article about JD Vance’s popularity index among Neo-Catholics who want to rip the Bill of Rights and shift from an Individual liberties democracy to a Common Good/Common Sense “democracy” (a nicer way to say Fascist) theocracy (Interestingly, it’s also an ambition of femists). Something like Pinochism without all the military costumes. The article explains that the Catholic’s goal is to pull Government inside the Church…
Have a read, it’s a great cup of tea to look into the near future: “The Post-liberal Catholics Find their Man”. On The Atlantic website it requires a subscription, but go on RealClearPolitics website, look at today’s articles list, the link to free reading is there.
What size is your tinfoil hat?
Denys Picard posted (amongst other inanities): The Deep State imposing JD Vance as his running mate… letting the Senate choose the VP: JD Vance
Denys, that entire post makes about as much sense as a basketball hoop installed at the pitcher’s mound in a MLB ballpark.
So typical of Trump to let the Senate which is controlled by the Soviet Democrats choose his vice president for him! We all knew Trump would let them do that!
WTF????
See below as the sycophant crowd denier, Dennis the Delusional Draft Dodger, shares his fever dreams and touts the polls that he was poo poo-ing 2 weeks ago.
He works every day at portraying himself as a spastic idiot non savant.
Jonathan: DJT is not on the campaign trail. He is doing press conferences at Mar-a-Lago like the one yesterday. DJT was asked “Why no campaign rallies?” DJT responded by deflecting. He claimed he is leading in the polls [not true] and he is waiting until after the DNC to get back out campaigning. But the DNC isn’t for 2 weeks and, in the meantime, DJT is losing ground every day while Harris/Walz are vigorously campaigning on DJT’s home turf in the battleground states. At the same press conference DJT bizarrely claimed the crowds at the Capitol on Jan. 6 were bigger than any of the Harris/ Walz rallies. DJT’s deranged mind thinks an insurrection to violently overturn an election is the equivalent of a campaign rally!
But there is probably another reason DJT isn’t holding campaign rallies. His MAGA crowds don’t begin to compare to those being held by Harris and Walz in Atlanta, Wisconsin and now Michigan where they held a rally at the Detroit airport yesterday. Videos of Harris and Walz arriving on Air Force Two show a huge crowd inside the hangar and the crowd spilling out onto the tarmac to greet Harris and Walz. Crowd estimates were that over 15,000 were in attendance at the airport rally. DJT could only match that in his wet dreams!
And now more out of shame DJT has finally agreed to debate Harris on September 10 on ABC. He has little choice. An Ipsos poll yesterday found Harris ahead of DJT–42% to 37%–with other polls showing an even larger margin for Harris. Seems DJT is now playing defense–panicking -a position he is not accustomed to when it really counts.
Dennis is the ignorant cock sucking liar who claimed there were 700 people at the rally at Doral. There were more than that in the stands behind Trump alone.
Dennis the ignorant troll doesnt find it odd that 11% didnt respond in his idiotic poll.
Trump still leads in the battleground states. Which means Trump still leads. National poll numbers mean NOTHING. But Dennis is too stupid to remember 2016.
He doesn’t lead by much. Plus his lead is shrinking. The majority are now within the margin of error. That’s not good for Trump. Now he has to actually do some work and propose real ideas instead of trying to figure what pet names he can give Harris. Dennis is right. The dynamics of the race are changing rapidly and Trump can’t seem to handle it. His campaign believed they were guaranteed a win after the assassination attempt. That has now evaporated and the Trump campaign was not prepared to deal with Biden dropping out and Harris stepping up. Harris is younger, smarter and has more energy behind her.
Trump looked horrible in his press conference. He looked desperate and went off into his usual rambling about crowd sizes and other petty grievances. Trump doesn’t have a viable strategy except his old standby. Attacking Harris on the basis of her race and that she is a woman. The racist in Trump really wants to get out. But it will just make things worse.
“That’s not good for Trump.”
Says the dumbass who just keeps ignoring what a Republican lead in the polls mean.
Instead he would rather act like a spastic idiot who doesnt remember 2016 and 2020.
“He doesn’t lead by much.”
Depends on the state
” Plus his lead is shrinking.”
P{robaly not – the polls run about a week behind and the poll averages a bit further than that.
Most current polls are registered rather than likely voters.
Dennis cited ipsos – but yesterdays ipsos – while having Harris leading Trump was DOWN 5pts from the prior ipsos.
“The majority are now within the margin of error.”
True. but unless you beleive the error will go harris’s way in all close polls – she still loses.
“That’s not good for Trump.”
Of course not – he would prefer to be 15pts up.
But there is a difference between being 7pts behind candidates that are well defined in the beging of august – which is where Trump was in 2016 and 202. And being at partity or ahead of a candidate that will not do an interview, does not speak without a teleprompter, does not talk about poilicies in her stump, whose past history is dreadful, and who may or may not have flip flopped since she became the candidate.
I am sure Trump would like to be up by 15. But there is not likely to be any good news for Harris after the DNC convention, and though less likely still the possibility the convention goes to h311. The Stock market has rallied – recovering SOME of its losses.
I think it is a mistake for Trump to be predicting depression. But a recession is more than a 50:50 shot.
Harris is trying hard to avoid being defined – that ios FOR now helping her in the polls – ut even CNN said she MUST come out of hiding or even the MSM will turn on her.
Republicans are ecstatic about the Walz nomination – Jews are pissed because Shapiro appeared to be a shoo in and Harris now looks anti-semetic.
I would note that Cory Bush just lost her democratic primary. In real elections people as far left as Harris and Walz are not doing well.
” Now he has to actually do some work and propose real ideas instead of trying to figure what pet names he can give Harris.”
George he has been doing REAL WORK – while you were tying him up in court all year – he STILL did rallies that make Harris rallies look like an old folks home after the sleeping pills were distributed. It is hillarious that people are claiming Harris attracts a crowd – YES, Compared to Biden. Not compared to Trump.
Trump has a clear record. He also has a platform. He is standing behind his record – everyone KNOWS Trump and what Trump will do.
They also KNOW he is not flip flopping. Harris has a record – when she lived in CA she was a toadfy for the Democrat establishment. And disasterous on policy – as a senator her voting records was the farthest left in the senate – worse than Sanders or Warren. For a decade she has been TALKING like AOC or the squad – and not any more coherently.
Since getting getting the nod – she has ALLEGEDLY flipped many of her positions – allegedly – we do not know, there are no policies on her web site, nothing in her rallies. Just leaks.
If Harris tries to shift towards the center – she will lose the far left.
If she embraces the far left – as she appears to be doing with Walz -0 she will lose the center.
Rassmussens crosstabs have her consistently down 10% among independents.
She is trying hard to run on a blank slate with no definition – do you really think people are going to elect a candidate with no positions ?
As she starts top take positions – she will LOSE votes.
She has nowhere to go but down.
Trump has actually proposed several new “ideas” no taxes on tips – which is an excellent idea. Income taxes on tipps are net negative – it costs more to collect and burdens the economy too boot.
He has also propsed no taxes on Social security. That is also a good idea but more complex. Tax revenue from SS is relatively small but it is not non-existant. Regardless, he needs some details as to how he is going to pay for that – but it is actually a low cost item.
” Dennis is right.”
If dennis says anything – you can asume it is wrong.
” The dynamics of the race are changing rapidly”
The race has changed – but it is unlikely to last. Democrats have had the dead weight of Joe Biden lifted from them. Many many democrats are expeincing exhuberance from the fact that the millstone that was Joe Biden is off their necks.
But people have not yet looked back at Harris and said – there is good reason she is the least popular Vice president in history.
There is a reason she dropped out in 2020 before any primaries.
Do you honestly beleive people are not going to start asking questions ?
“Trump can’t seem to handle it.”
Wise people do not bet against Trump.
“His campaign believed they were guaranteed a win after the assassination attempt.”
Trump was ahead before that and democrats were despondent.
” That has now evaporated”
Not evaporated – there are some benfits Trump gets from that forever. It feeds strongly into his portral as a martyr.
Regardless – you shoudl consider that the euphoria over Biden dropping out will also evaporate.
Harris does not have demensia as an excuse.
Frankly she is a worse candidate than Biden. When the euphoria evaporates do you really think she will remain popular ?
Besides there is lots of evidence that a great deal (not all) of this sugar high is fake.
The media is back to its old tricks of spinning like mad, but they are less proforma because they KNEW Biden was a dog.
“the Trump campaign was not prepared to deal with Biden dropping out and Harris stepping up. ”
I am sure they had a plan for that. It did not work exactlyu as they expoected.
Nothing has worked as people expected.
Frankly Democrats should be ashamed and embarressed at what they have done – they pushed a disaster on us for 4 years, and at the last minute with no vote, no primary they forced him out and replaced him with someone no one voted for.
And you want the rest of us to beleive you did not cheat in 2020 ?
You just cheated voters MASSIVELY ?
Do you think Harris would have won a democratic primary ?
I am not going to make a huge deal of this – you did it to yourselves. There is no way that I was ever voting for Harris, so I do not have a dog in that fight. If you manage top successfully inflict Harris on the rest of us – you have no one but yourself to blame.
Though in that unlikely event I am sure we will have 4 more years of idiots like you and Gigi and Dennis continuing toi blame all your mistakes on Trump – you will do that even after he is dead.
Your incapable of seeing the reality that your policies have failed disasterously.
“Harris is younger,” She is no spring Chickjen, “smarter” Than Biden – absolutely. Than almost anyone else – no. That Trump – not even close. “and has more energy behind her.” Than Trump – no. But she does have more energy behind her than Biden.
Democrats have traded one millstone for another. They just have not grasped how heavy the new one is yet.
Trump is not worried, outside the chattering class republicans are not worried.
“Trump looked horrible in his press conference.”
I watched it, he looked fine. It was a press conference – not a rally, He got lots of $shit questions – that is typical. He handled them fine.
He exagerates -0 but that is not new. We are not headed to a depression – we are probably only headed into a mild recession. But we are headed into a recession. Biden has been a disaster, Harris would likely be worse.
But one advantage left wing nuts have is it takes a great deal of error to destroy an economy. Xi has been the leader of China for 10 years. He actually inherited a rising economy and a rising stature in the world. It has taken him ten years but he has destroyed that.
China is likely to fail – but it still has not – that is how hard it is to actually destroy an economy.
Biden and democrats have not destroy the economy – Harris will not destroy the economy – but they did and she will make it worse.
Lreft wing policies deliver lower rates of growth of standard of living – we have seen that in Europe. Taken far enough they can destory economies – as in Venezuella.
Milei has been president of Argentia for 6 months – he inherited a total disaster – things are improving rapidly – but they are still NOT good. It takes alot to destory an economy – it takes alot to recover.
Trump can boost the rate of improvement by about 1% without sweating – probably without help from congress. But improvement beyond that – though absollutely possible would be very difficult – it would require getting alot right for a long time.
The greatest danger of President Harris is nuclear war. The odds of that are low. They would be low under Harris. But even so they are higher than they have been since the cuban missle crisis. They may actually be higher than that now because it has been 80 years since nuclear weapons were used in anger, It has been 30 years since the cold war ended. we are blithe to how easy we could get into an end of civilization scenario.
Putin has tjhreatened to use tactical nukes repeatedly. I do not think he will, but even 2% odds is much greater than in 2020.
And if he does – how will we respond – if our response is not adequate – he will use them again. If our response is too strong the world ends.
Trump will end this war. Harris is clueless.
Please cite any instance ever when Harris has made a significant deal with anyone – especially one in which she had no clear power dynamic advantage. Most of her “deal making” has been as a prosecutor threatening to jail people. That is not dealing – that is coercion. How well do you think that kind of coercion will work with Putin.
I have not read the art of the deal – but key to truily free exchanges is that all parties must think they are winning.
Harris hasn’t got a clue how to do that.
There is a reason that Trump praises difficult and powerful world leaders. If you want people to make a deal – the carrot works better than the stick.
“He looked desperate”
Trump is still experiencing the euphoria of someone who has been shot and survived with little harm.
No he is not depressed.
“went off into his usual rambling about crowd sizes”
Yes, because those of you on the left keep lying and bring it up.
Harris is getting bigger crowds than Biden.
But if I would guess – JD Vance is getting bigger crowds than Harris/Walsh.
Trump’s crowds are not as large as he claims – they are still far larger than the press claims, and far larger than harris.
Does that matter ? It is a check on the press and the polls. One of the reasons that people do not beleive that Biden won in 2020 – is because he could not get 12 people at a rally.
Do crowd sizes have to exactly correspond to polls – no. But they are not going to be WAY off.
There are people who beleive Trump won California – there is no way there was 4M fraudulent votes in CA.
That is not the same as beleiving there were 200,000 fraudulent votes in PA – afterall PA still has 200K more ballots from 2020 than voters.
“other petty grievances”
And those would be ?
” Trump doesn’t have a viable strategy except his old standby. Attacking Harris on the basis of her race and that she is a woman.”
Trump has done neither. He pointed out that Harris can not figure out what race she is – that attack was not just on Harris – it was on your stupid ideologyh. Harris is bi-racial black and east asian. It is irelevant how she IDENTIFIES – that is who she is.
It should not matter – but when you play the race card – you prove that to you it DOES matter and that you are a racist.
Trump is puhing Harris’s flip flopping on race – because that alienates both blacks and indian voters.
Worse stiull – many blacks do not think Harris is black – either as Don Lemon has said because her father is jamacan not african american, or because Harris was born into an affluent and elite family and the worst racism she has experience is the beleif that indians are smarter than the rest of us. Of course Harris is not that smart.
Regardless, Obama had the ability to be viewed by blacks as one of them – despite his biracial heritage., and weirdish upbrining.
“The racist in Trump really wants to get out.”
What does this even mean ? Trump has no problems with people of all races and orientations – he treats them the same – he is surrounded by extraordinary numbers of gays blacks and women – but he is not stupid like Romney talking about binders of women.
He treats people the same. He accurately answered the NABJ reporter – it does not matter what Race Harris is.
But it does matter that she engages in race and sex pandering.
John Say, that’s one long winded exercise in apologetics. Making excuses does not change reality.
Trump is clearly on the defensive and he is clearly concerned about the lack of attention he thinks he deserves. The interview at the NABJ was indeed a disaster. He wasn’t answering any questions. He was complaining and whining and making things worse.
” Trump doesn’t have a viable strategy except his old standby. Attacking Harris on the basis of her race and that she is a woman.”
Trump has done neither. He pointed out that Harris can not figure out what race she is – that attack was not just on Harris – it was on your stupid ideologyh. Harris is bi-racial black and east asian. It is irelevant how she IDENTIFIES – that is who she is.
You miss the point. Trump is displaying a level of ignorance and detachment from reality that brings the criticism he gets. Harris is not the one who cannot figure out what race she is. It’s Trump who cannot figure it out because he want to insult her but can’t figure out how. Harris doesn’t have to justify to anyone who she is because she knows who she is. Trump is using that false claim to insinuate that she’s being racist. It’s Trump who is being racist and everyone there knew it. That’s why the interview was so controversial.
“Please cite any instance ever when Harris has made a significant deal with anyone – especially one in which she had no clear power dynamic advantage.”
How is that any different than making deals as a businessman? A prosecutor has a power dynamic advantage. That’s why they are called prosecutors.
Harris has been an unknown because her work was being done in the background away from the spotlight. Now that she’s considered a better candidate than Biden and a better contrast against Trump she is showing to voters how old and cognitively challenged Trump really is compared to her. Trump has to really campaign now. He was coasting before Harris came onboard. Now he has to contend with actually working for his election instead of riffing and making useless slogans against democrats. It’s clear Trump was not prepared to deal with Biden dropping out and he is not handling it well.
Harris is likely viewed as a better candidate because she is not senile/demented, NOT because she is smarter, more skilled, a better communicator, wiser, or better knowledgeable, Speak the truth, george.
Of course, dennis is the same cock sucking douche who claimed 2 weeks ago tht polls mean nothing.
Reports are that rallygoers are being paid by the Harris/Walz campaign.
Dennis the ignorant pedophile doesn’t think press conferences are a good way to campaign.
He thinks repeating the same pathetic rhetoric to sycophant audiences is much better LMAO
Harris does no press conferences. Everytime she has to talk off teleprompter she sounds like a moron.
So does Trump, so what’s your point?
The Harris walz rallies are so large that MSNBC has to photoshop them.The Harris Rallies are so large she has to pay people to attend.
The Harris Rallies are so large that she must provide a freee concert by a top rapper to get half the crowd Trump gets.
John Say,
“The Harris walz rallies are so large that MSNBC has to photoshop them.The Harris Rallies are so large she has to pay people to attend.
The Harris Rallies are so large that she must provide a freee concert by a top rapper to get half the crowd Trump gets.”
Where’s your proof? It’s unlike you to start outright lying. You seem to be parroting the talking points from the right without any evidence to back it up. You’re behaving like Trump. Throwing wild claims and accusations when things are not looking good.
George, for God’s sake, will you lay off the “where’s the evidence/show me the proof” nonsense that you and Gigi throw out everyday–while simultaneously presenting your own personal opinions as authoritative fact?
—or lifting and pasting (someone has to teach Gigi how to correctly use quotation marks…) other Internet commentary as fact?
Also, I want a dollar for every time you have insulted other commenters with your “reading comprehension” nonsense (reappropriated/stolen from another commenter, and not with valor), when in fact, I find that quite an issue with your own replies to those who challenge you.
Just cut it out, OK? Let’s be nice and just try to address the issues raised. Thanking you in advance, lin.
NOTE the usual Democrat/media propaganda playbook:
“Trump is lying”
“without any proof”
“without any evidence”
“Republicans are lying”
“where’s your proof”
“wild claims and accusations”
“there is no evidence”
“It was taken out of context”
“Okay Walz misspoke”
“Okay Harris misspoke”
“okay Biden misspoke”
“okay, there is some evidence”
“Okay, it’s true”
“Why are you still talking about this, it’s old news”
“we’ve moved on from that, why is Trump still talking about it?”
“Trump is desperate”
“Trump is a RACIIIIIST!”
Trump still leads in nearly all battlegounds in the POLL averages. Rassmussen which is the only daily tracking poll says Harris peaked and is tanking.
Regardless Harris has or will peak.
Walz was a tactically abysmal choice.
It is my understanding that Harris has agreed to Trump’s proposed 3 debates in September – she may have a fawning press, but she will not have a teleprompter for those.
Your assessment of facts may seem encouraging but I cannot ignore a duplicitous media and a corrupt prog/left party that will stoop as low as needed to secure their grasp of power. I am sure they are busy erasing biden and replacing harris on all those bins of pre-marked ballots that will be dropped in the ninth hour on election night.
Relying only on Rasmussen is not showing Trump is leading. In battleground states Trump’s lead is shrinking and in the majority of polls they are within the margin of error.
Trump is stumbling and his attempts to regain the attention of the press is starting to show. He worried he’s not getting the attention he usually enjoys. He’s more concerned about the lack of attention than running his campaign and it shows.
Another commenter on another site inspired me to create a new internet acronym; it certainly applies as well to you as to anyone: PONI – person of no interest.
Dennis: thanks. DJT told some other stunning lies–like almost being killed in a helicopter crash in which Willie Brown was a passenger and he had terrible things to say about Kamala Harris. The helicopter ride to which he refers didn’t almost crash, and Willie Brown wasn’t aboard–that was JERRY Brown, Governor of California, who went along to survey the damage from a wildfire. He also said that he drew a bigger crowd than MLK’s “I have a Dream Speech”, and repeated the lie about the size of his inauguration crowd.
Then, there’s the “stolen valor” lies about Tim Walz, who retired from the National Guard after 24 years of service to run for public office. Vance accused him of ditching the service to avoid being deployed overseas. That deployment order for Walz’s unit came 2 months AFTER Walz turned in his retirement papers.
Trump also said that Walz did a terrible job handling the violent protests in Milwaukee after the murder of George Floyd and that Trump had to send in the National Guard to get the situation under control. Both lies. There is a recorded phone call in which Trump praised Gov. Walz for his handling of the situation and for his deployment of the National Guard.
DJT didn’t just claim to be “ahead” in the polls–he said he was “way ahead”–another lie. I don’t understand why Trump fans aren’t apparently bothered by this pattern of childish lies and narcissistic bluster. Don’t you think other world leaders see this and wonder what the hell Trump is doing even running for office?
Gigi, the skank ass coward who has never spent one single day in the military, or doing anything else to serve her country, pipes in with this ignorant statement.
Then, there’s the “stolen valor” lies about Tim Walz, who retired from the National Guard after 24 years of service to run for public office. Vance accused him of ditching the service to avoid being deployed overseas. That deployment order for Walz’s unit came 2 months AFTER Walz turned in his retirement papers.
Gigi the spastic idiot doesnt know the difference between stolen valor and cowardly acts.
The stolen valor was claiming that he carried “weapons into war”. This is on video more than once. He did NOT. STOLEN VALOR.
Leaving the service after being conditionally promoted to E9, and not extending to meet the required TIS commitment is not stolen valor, idiot. It was a cowardly act, because the COMMANDING OFFICER said they knew about the deployment WELL BEFORE Walz submitted his papers. HE hasn’t denied that the upcoming deployment was part of his decision, because everyone who has SERVED knows goddam well it was. It was well within his right to choose not to go, but he left his unit HANGING. I wouldn’t expect you to undersatnd why people in his outfit were unhappy, but Vance does. Because he served. YOU should STFU about it because you are, as usual, ignorant.
Also problematic, and perhaps most egregious, was his claim online and in his official bio, as having retired as an E9. That was false, and he knew it was.
He left this posted even AFTER being called out for it when he ran for Governor. This offense is actually punishable under the UCMJ. Its a good thing he is retired. I’m uncertain if he could lose his benefits for this unlawful act.
As usual, you cite NOTHING to back up your claims. J.D. Vance was a “Public Affairs Specialist”–i.e.–a PR person. From “Newsweek”, dateline 8/8/2024:
“Senator JD Vance has been criticized by veterans after he attacked the military record of Tim Walz, the recently announced running mate of Vice President Kamala Harris.
Speaking to reporters in Michigan on Wednesday, Donald Trump’s running mate accused the Minnesota governor of “stolen valor” for allegedly claiming that he had served in a war, and for “abandoning” his unit.
Walz spent 24 years in the National Guard, rising to command sergeant major, one of the top ranks for an enlisted soldier. He left the Guard in 2005, months before the battalion he led was notified that they were to be deployed to Iraq. Walz previously said his decision to retire was due to him deciding to run for Congress.
Vance served in the Marine Corps for four years, although he never saw combat. He served as combat correspondent in Iraq between August 2005 and February 2006.
The attack against Walz appears to be in reference to remarks Walz made at a campaign rally that the Harris campaign shared on social media. The governor says while speaking about gun control: “We can make sure those weapons of war, that I carried in war, are only carried in war.”
Vance accused Tim Walz of “stolen valor.” “Well, I wonder Tim Walz, when were you ever in war? What was this weapon that you carried into war given that you abandoned your unit right before they went to Iraq and he has not spent a day in a combat zone,” Vance said.
“What bothers me about Tim Waltz is the stolen valor garbage. Do not pretend to be something that you’re not.
“And if you want to criticize me for getting an Ivy League education, I’m proud of the fact that my men all supported me, that I was able to make something of myself. I’d be ashamed if I was him and I lied about my military service like you did.”
Luke Schroeder, a spokesman for Vance, later told Newsweek: “Tim Walz lied about carrying a weapon in a war and abandoned his unit as they prepared to actually deploy for war – he said he would answer the call, but when the call came, he ran for office instead.
“There’s nothing more insulting to veterans who do answer the call to serve in a combat zone like Senator Vance did than those who engage in stolen valor to benefit their political career – which is exactly what Walz appears to have done.”
A number of military veterans have since condemned Vance for attacking Walz for his military record.
Retired lieutenant general Mark Hertling, a former commander of American ground forces in Europe, posted on X: “It’s unbecoming and unprofessional for anyone—especially veterans—to openly disparage anyone who has served in uniform.”
NAME someone who you claim KNOWS that Walz left after 24 years BECAUSE of an upcoming deployment. Also–cite what you claim is the OFFENSE Walz committed by retiring after 24 years of service. If you can’t do either–then STFU.
AWOLz lied about his service, for years. Stolen valor. He can’t run from it.
Vance served honorably.
Gigi is right.
Waters says, “The stolen valor was claiming that he carried “weapons into war”.
No he didn’t. He said he carried weapons IN war. Of course reading comprehension becomes a problem. It doesn’t mean what you think it means.
Vance was a military correspondent and “saw” combat occasionally from his air conditioned office in Iraq for 6mo and served only 4 years. Walz served for 24 years and did his duty like any other military member. Vance is a Marine, yet he isn’t acting honorably.
Are you insane? He carried weapons IN war? By that logic so did any psychopath who shot up a school in the past 20 years? Are you lionizing mass murderers now?
“Iraq 2005-06 was very dangerous. Roadside bombs, rocket/mortar attacks on bases made up the majority of casualties, so non door kickers were in as much danger as grunts/commandos.
JD Vance volunteered for a deployment many didn’t come home from, Walz hid from it.” @joekent16jan19
Thank you for this. Of course, for George and Gigi this will be like showing a pig a wristwatch.
Cite something or STFU.
AWOLz explainer —->
“Stolen valor – lying about being in combat.
Exaggerated valor – hyping up a role to make it seem like you have more responsibility than you did.
Deployment dodging – being in chain of command and knowing your unit is going to combat, and getting out before orders arrive!”
Blue falcon–look it up.
(intended for George, Gigi and their fellow mouth-breathers)
gigless:
Why did the Harris-Biden campaign–in the last 24 hours– quietly change the wording in Walz’ biography to correct the false/misleading sentence?
Campaigning for his previous and current jobs, Walz said the following:
“I’m a retired sergeant major in the Army and the Army National Guard,’ he told a group of voters in the latter video.”
He repeated this falsehood during SEVERAL different campaign speeches and fundraisers/events.
The Harris-Walz campaign on its website initially called Walz a “retired Command Sergeant Major” but then was forced to change his biography to say he “served as a command sergeant major.”https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/assessing-claims-about-tim-walz-s-military-service/ar-AA1owquI
(of course his temporary elevation to sergeant major was removed when he failed to complete the training associated therewith, and he retired as a master sergeant.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/assessing-claims-about-tim-walz-s-military-service/ar-AA1owquI
“Vance served in the Marine Corps for four years, although he never saw combat. He served as combat correspondent in Iraq between August 2005 and February 2006.”
Do you have any idea how stupid you sound? He served in Iraq. That’s a combat zone. Even in a combat zone, most of the personnel aren’t trigger-pullers. Anyone in a combat zone is susceptible to IEDs, mortar attacks, snipers and anything else the enemy uses. Vance was willingly went in harm’s way, AWOLz avoided it and you’re a festering pinhead.
Remove “was” or “went” from that last sentence. Your choice.
Speaking to reporters in Michigan on Wednesday, Donald Trump’s running mate accused the Minnesota governor of “stolen valor” for allegedly claiming that he had served in a war, and for “abandoning” his unit.
Once again, ya spastic idiot, you show your biggest problem. Getting your info from some idiot reporter, who also never served. See that—the stolen valor claim was about saying he took a “weapon into war”. Walz lied about it. STOLEN VALOR. Abondoning your unit is stolen valor, nincompoop.
Do you need me to repeat it all again?
Its right there, ya spastic.
And you can shut the fvck up, ya stupid kunt.
And your idiot General can go fvck himself too. He has it exactly backward. The ONLY people allowed to comment about anothers service, is PEOPLE WHO SERVED. Stolen valor should mean NOTHING to you, ya dunce. YOU have no valor to steal. All you have is a big fat mouth and an ignorant, ill informed opinion, given to you in a news article and a fvcking tweet.
Thats why I can say claiming Beau came home from Iraq in a flag draped coffin is goddam STOLEN VALOR. Why don’t you try denying that one again. You have before.
STOLEN VALOR
Thanks for posting the proof of what I said.
I appreciate Walz’s service. Too bad he is a douche.
“Abondoning your unit is stolen valor, nincompoop.”
Typo sorry. This should have said “isn’t”
Dennis -= Trump got more than Double Harris’s crowd in atlanta.
We are talking about in a city that voted for Biden by 90%.
Trump did not bring any entertainers – people came to see him.
The only part of the arena that was not full during the event was the press section – which is were the deceptive MSM photos come from.
Trump had an overflow into the parking area outside with nearly half attendees not being abler to get it.
Conversely Harris’s rally only filled the bopttom half of the auditorium and people stated leaving after the rap show.
In 2020 if you proted a MAGA hgat in Beverly hills you would get assualted.
Today people come up to you and say they are voting for Trump too.
Further no on has shot at much less wounded Harris. She does not have the SS saying no more public rallies.
I do not know what Hanger video you saw – but the only one in Michigan I could find had a crowd of less than 1000.
Most hangers are not that large.
But I am sure the Secret Service was happy – there are no clear shots from a hundred yards away at a candidate who is inside a building.
HJarris has not had a press conference since Biden dropped out. She has only answered a question from the Press ONCE in that time – and we got a muddled word salad. She has announced that she will not do another press conference for 3 weeks. She does not speak without a teleprompter.
She has no official policies and platform – She does not talk about either at her rallies. While unlikel Biden she atleast appears in public – she does not say anything.
For the moment this is sort of working. It will not work forever.
And should we actually end upo with a Vice president who thinks that Socialism is “just being neighborly” – god help us.
Ipsos is always a democratic outlier.
https://youtu.be/ud1mP7aAWiM
Here is Rassmussen which over estimated Biden in 2020 by 2 pts and over estimated Clinton in 2016 by 2pt.
I would further note that the Tewo most recent nbational polls have Trump up by +5 and + 2 respectively.
Further in Early august of 2020 and 2016 – Democrats were up +7
‘
The ipsos poll has 21% undecided or voting for 3rd parties – it is useless. It is also an online poll.
ipsos showed Trump and Biden tied when Biden left the race.
You are free to beleive ipsos
ipsos was D+5 in 2016 and D+3 in 2020
Rassmussen was R+3 in 2020 and R+1 in 2016
Rasmussen is considered unreliable.
By your stupid ass
The ipsos poll has 21% undecided or voting for 3rd parties – it is useless. It is also an online poll.
ipsos showed Trump and Biden tied when Biden left the race.
You are free to beleive ipsos
ipsos was D+5 in 2016 and D+3 in 2020
Rassmussen was R+3 in 2020 and R+1 in 2016
Gigi just looked at the sun rising in the east and said it rises in the west.
Trump does press conferences all the time and the MSM lies about them all the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McXjpQFFN90
Trump took questions for a full hour. You can listen to it. he did fine.
Trump BTW agreed to 3 debates Fox 9/5 NBC 9/10 and ABC 9/25
Are you saying that Harris has aggreed to ANY of those ?
Dennis – you have been lying about the polls repeatedly since Biden defaulted.
Harris is doing better than she was initally – and she is STILL way behind where you said she was initially.
According to the “Daily Mail” August 9, 2024:
“Kamala Harris leads Donald Trump by five points in the race for the U.S. presidential election, according to the most recent poll.
Harris has reportedly widened her lead – 42% to 37% – since a July 23 poll found her up only three points over Trump.
The latest result has now seen online betting odds turn against the former President, with Harris viewed as even more of a favorite.
Ipsos conducted the August poll of 2,045 U.S. adults and found 4% of those surveyed backed independent candidate Robert Kennedy Jr., down from 10% in July.
Harris entered the race on July 21 when President Joe Biden, 81, folded his campaign and endorsed Harris following a disastrous debate performance on June 27 against Trump.
Last week, a stunning poll showed Harris had seized a four-point national polling lead over Trump.
Former San Francisco mayor Willie Brown has said Donald Trump ‘s claim they shared a near-death experience ‘never happened’. Republican presidential nominee Trump told reporters at a Mar-A-Lago news conference that he and Brown were in a helicopter that was forced to make an emergency landing and both men thought this ‘may be the end’.
The poll, by Marquette University Law School, gave Harris a bigger lead when third party candidates like Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. are included.
It had her leading the Republican Trump 52 to 48. When Kennedy is included, along with Jill Stein and Cornel West, her lead grew to 47 for Harris, and 41 for Trump. Kennedy gets 9 percent.”
“According to the “Daily Mail” August 9, 2024:”
Vomit on the page
We can count on your skank ass for that
Walz is proving a treasure Trove for Republican s – Even CNN has facted checked his military service and said his claims are FALSE.
He did NOt retire as a Command Sergent Major the Minesota Natioonal; Guard rejects his claim that he completed the requirements to hold that Rank, he was breifly an ACTING CSM and then notified that he was being deployed to Iraq – where his unit actually saw Combat – with 3 men killed. But Walz did not see combat because he abbrptly retired before being deployed – purportedly to run for congress even though the election was more than a year away.
Regardless, he has repeatedly claimed to have served in Combat – he has never served in a combat zone much less been under Enemy fire.
He says he served in Operation Enduring Freedom – Afghanistan, yet he never when to afghanistan.
I would note this is significantly WORSE than the John Kerry Swiftboat story. Kerry actually went to Vietnam, and served in combat he merely exagerated his combat role and his medals.
If the Stolen Valor law was not unconstitutional – Walz would be a criminal.
Vance served in Iraq, but admits that he was lucky enough not to see combat. Vance has not lied about his service.
Walz has.
And that is just his military service.
Anyone who thinks Socialism – the bloddiest ideology in existance is “just being neighborly” is …. “weird”
Anyone who thinks that Tampons belon in the mens restrooms is …
weird”
France, Italy, the UK, Sweden all tried this “gender Afirming healthcare” nonsense. They All bailed as they found that it was disasterous,
and wrecking the lives of large numbers of teens who after being victimized by this nonsense would have to spend the rest of their lives on drugs that we do not have life time experience with, that alter behavior and mood. And that it true Even if as most do they later chance their mind – They STILL are trapped with a multilated body and a lifetime of drugs that would not have been necescary had they waited a few more years.
Again the UK, France, Italy and Sweden tried this nonsense and bailed.
Walz issues executive orders that are plainly unconstitutional.
Under Walz MN is refusing to honor court orders, extradition orders and the like from other states – which is explicitly prohibited in the US constitution. Do you think Trump would have gone to Manhattan or Atlanta if Florida would have said – nah, you do not have to respond to subpeonas and court orders from other states.
Walz took an 18B budge surpless and turned it into a deficit in one year. Wonder where the money comes from next year ?
Walz has takne MN to the number 3 or 4 state (all blue) with net out migrantion.
Crime has risen dramatically and he is another of the nut jobs that characterized the Floyd riots as justified protests that were just a little messy.
Historically the places we have had riots like these either take decades to recover economically, or never recover.
Even dogs understand – don’t schiff in your own bed.
Wonder if the Dems are going to swap him out at the convention. Something is up with Walz being on the ticket because he is horrendously bad. He is clearly a bad man, a very bad person. His record is a mess, so much so that it seems as if he was not vetted. Eric Holder did the VP vetting for Harris. What is Holder and his pal Obama up to? Did they set Kamala up? Something is not right with this ticket. The DNC is gonna be nuts. The October surprise is going to be even more nuts. Buckle up.
Walz is “clearly a bad man, a very bad person”? How deep into DJT discipleship do you have to be to believe such a big fat lie and ignore DJT’s unfitness for office? Walz served 24 years in the National Guard. He was a teacher and HS coach, a Senator, and now, a Governor, in contradistinction to Trump who is:
1. a convicted criminal
2. an adjudicated fraudster. The extent of his lying about the value of his assets was found to be “shocking to the conscience”.
3. adjudicated for sexually assaulting a woman and defaming her. Twice.
4. a patholotical liar, sociopath and malignant narcissist.
5. a thief of classified documents.
6. under dozens of additional indictments.
7. an insurrectionist, whose Big Lie was the direct and proximate cause of the death of Ashli Babbitt who died because she believed his lies.
8. on his third marriage–5 children via 3 different wives, each of whom he cheated on.
9. a lousy businessman, lousy president and who never won the popular vote.
You speak of being “horrendously bad”–how much worse could anyone running for office be than DJT?
“You speak of being “horrendously bad”–how much worse could anyone running for office be than DJT?”
You’ll see.
Stolen valor is bad, and he can’t run from it, but there is much worse coming out on AWOLz.
His record is so bad that it is hard to believe putting him on the ticket wasn’t a setup to switch out for a new surprise ticket later in the fall with only a short time left before the election.
Trump is a literal saint compared to these Dirty Democrats. His record speaks for itself. And THEY know it, too. Which is why they had to make sh*t up and play their lawfare games.
Take away all the Dems bogus lawfare and what do you have? Nothing.
Make Kamala talk about the real issues, and what will people see? A woman so far out of her depth that it is frightening.
Quote for Gigi to ponder:
“A Marxist system is recognized by the fact that it spares the criminals and criminalizes political opponents.” ~Solzhenitsyn
If the Stolen Valor law was not unconstitutional – Walz would be a criminal.
No. He didn’t falsely claim to have received a medal or award. That’s all the old law banned. The new law adds “for money”.
Harris’s web site STILL does not say what her policies are.
That’s the plan. Duck and hide. Run a Basement campaign with non-stop media propaganda.
Bait and switch. Fool the voters, then once in power, unleash their Marxist agenda.
The Commie from California & the Marxist from Minnesota.
Her campaign is: We’re not Trump. That’s it.
Dennis – if there is a Democratic rally in Wayne County, Michigan, a large part of that crowd will probably be union members who have been given time off work to go or who have been ordered to go. At Metropolitan Airport, almost all the empolyess are unionized.