Alissa Eleanor Azar, a well-known Antifa activist, was sentenced to jail recently in Oregon after being convicted of felony riot and disorderly conduct. What is notable about the case was the journalism defense put forward by Azar, who claims that she was not a participant but press. That assertion is belied by not just videotapes of Azar assaulting members of the far-right group The Proud Boys but her long record of violence.
The court rejected the journalism defense after reviewing videotapes showing Azar organizing with Antifa and then engaging in the attacks. Ironically, while arguing for press freedom, her counsel attempted to bar media from the courtroom, seeking an order to block the conservative outlet Post Millennial, which has dedicated much coverage to Antifa.
As discussed in my new book, “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage,” I explore the history of Antifa as a movement that began in Germany:
“Antifa originated with European anarchist and Marxist groups from the 1920s, particularly Antifaschistische Aktion, a Communist group from the Weimar Republic before World War II. Its name resulted from the shortening of the German word antifaschistisch. In the United States, the modern movement emerged through the Anti- Racist Action (ARA) groups, which were dominated by anarchists and Marxists. It has an association with the anarchist organization Love and Rage, which was founded by former Trotsky and Marxist followers as well as offshoots like Mexico’s Amor Y Rabia. The oldest U.S. group is likely the Rose City Antifa (RCA) in Portland, Oregon, which would become the center of violent riots during the Trump years. The anarchist roots of the group give it the same organizational profile as such groups in the early twentieth century with uncertain leadership and undefined structures.”
Despite the denial of its existence by figures like Rep. Jerry Nadler (D., N.Y.), I have long written and spoken about the threat of Antifa to free speech on our campuses and in our communities. This includes testimony before Congress on Antifa’s central role in the anti-free speech movement nationally.
As I have previously written, it has long been the “Keyser Söze” of the anti-free speech movement, a loosely aligned group that employs measures to avoid easy detection or association. Yet, FBI Director Chris Wray has repeatedly pushed back on the denials of Antifa’s work or violence. In one hearing, Wray stated “And we have quite a number” — and “Antifa is a real thing. It’s not a fiction.”
We have continued to follow the attacks and arrests of Antifa followers across the country, including attacks on journalists.
Some Democrats have played a dangerous game in supporting or excusing the work of Antifa. Former Democratic National Committee deputy chair Keith Ellison, now the Minnesota attorney general, once said Antifa would “strike fear in the heart” of Trump. This was after Antifa had been involved in numerous acts of violence and its website was banned in Germany.
Ellison’s son, Minneapolis City Council member Jeremiah Ellison, declared his allegiance to Antifa in the heat of the protests this summer. During a prior hearing, Democratic senators refused to clearly denounce Antifa and falsely suggested that the far right was the primary cause of recent violence. Likewise, Joe Biden has dismissed objections to Antifa as just “an idea.”
It is at its base a movement at war with free speech, defining the right itself as a tool of oppression. That purpose is evident in what is called the “bible” of the Antifa movement: Rutgers Professor Mark Bray’s Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook.
Bray emphasizes the struggle of the movement against free speech: “At the heart of the anti-fascist outlook is a rejection of the classical liberal phrase that says, ‘I disapprove of what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.’”
Bray admits that “most Americans in Antifa have been anarchists or antiauthoritarian communists… From that standpoint, ‘free speech’ as such is merely a bourgeois fantasy unworthy of consideration.”
Antifa has often targeted journalists or critics for violent attacks. The conservative site Hot Air showed attacks by Antifa supporters after the hearing.
Judge Todd L. Van Rysselberghe for the 5th Judicial District Circuit Court of Oregon sentenced her to 14 days in a local jail, followed by 36 months of supervised probation and GPS monitoring. That short stint was still more than courts and prosecutors have been willing to impose in past cases involving Antifa violence.
Previously, Azar was charged with violence in the Portland riots. However, as with other district attorneys, Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt dropped those and other charges despite massive property damage and injuries associated with those riots.
The use of media credentials by Antifa activists has dangerously blurred the line of press and protesters for police. That puts real journalists at greater risk.
In the meantime, Antifa (the group that supposedly does not exist) has elected members to legislative offices in Europe as more radical parties make inroads both in the United States and around the world.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. He is the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage” (Simon & Schuster).
I am patiently awaiting for NY Times to report what happened to that white van which FBI had towed in Butler PA, and which belonged to convicted Antifa criminal Maxwell Yearick.
Any ideas, Turley?
Presuming the facts Turley laid out are correct – 14days for an assault conviction is FAR FAR too little. That would result in multi year sentences in my community.
At the same time the Judge was WRONG to deprive her of a Journalism defense.
Judges are ALWAYS wrong to deny defendants the right to make whatever defense they wish.
It is NOT the judge who should decide if the defendant was acting as a journalist – but the jury – that is a question of FACT, not of law.
Jurries decide FACTS not judges.
Terrorists should be allowed justification defenses – if they are stupid enough to go with them.
Prosecutors routinely Rant “Oh, No, Not the Twinky Defense – Juroors will be confused” – Really ?
How many jurors do you know that will buy “the twinky made me do it ?” or “I beat up that guy because I am a journalist” ?
Or “Allah commands I kill infidels” ?
One.
* if you prayed full time for the remainder of your lives it would not be enough.
Azar is deeply disturbed and she’s merely a pawn to disrupt the peace of others. People like Harris, Waters, Biden and others enjoy laughing at your discomfort.
Let your hearts rest and proceed working in setting things right.
“Simultaneous to her involvement with Antifa in Portland, Azar has also grown a fanbase within that community for her sex work. She runs an OnlyFans account where she shows off nude photos of herself standing in front of Antifa print propaganda. In some of the photos, Azar dons a balaclava while brandishing an AR-15-style rifle.”
“In March 2021, Azar was charged with second-degree disorderly conduct and interfering with a peace officer at an Antifa riot in downtown Portland. Her case was dropped by Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt—in line with his 2020 policy of not prosecuting most leftist riot-related crimes.”
“In December 2022, she was charged with felony robbery, felony assault, tampering with physical evidence, theft and other serious crimes stemming from an attack on a citizen journalist in August 2022 in downtown Portland. Schmidt’s prosecutors asked a judge to dismiss the case entirely in 2023.
“In May 2024, she was charged over a pro-Hamas riot on the Portland State campus after far-left occupiers were evicted from a violent four-day occupation of the Millar Library that sustained over a million dollars in damage.”
“Azar joins a long list of Antifa self-described journalists who have been accused or convicted of politically motivated violent crimes.”
https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-oregon-jury-convicts-violent-portland-antifa-ringleader-alissa-azar-of-felony-over-2021-attack
Pictures please, evidentiary material requires a citation.
open the attached link. There are at least 3 or 4 “pictures please” entered into evidence, as well as images of her social media posts.
“ABC debate moderator Linsey Davis was a member of the same storied sorority as Kamala Harris”
– NY Post
Ironically, while arguing for press freedom, her counsel attempted to bar media from the courtroom, seeking an order to block the conservative outlet Post Millennial, which has dedicated much coverage to Antifa.
The DNC/MSM is squashing any negative coverage of their brown shirts engaging in violence, anti-semitism and militancy. Instead they pivot to “right wing” types caught in the act of doing….. blah, blah, blah.
It’s perfectly fine for Democrats to be racists, Nazis and militants, which is why the DNC / MSM kept secret the photo of Barack Obama and Louis Farrakhan, the father of all anti-semitic, Nazi, infidels made in the image of Malcolm X, a Communist
Farrakhan And Obama Photo Hidden Since 2005
A photographer has printed for the first time a photograph he took in 2005 of then-Senator Barack Obama with Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam, Talking Points Memo reported. Askia Muhammad, the photographer, said that he took the photo at a meeting of the Congressional Black Caucus in 2005, but was contacted by a Congressional Black Caucus staff member and asked to withhold it. He said he later gave the photo to Farrakhan’s chief-of-staff, but kept a copy.
https://forward.com/fast-forward/392886/farrakhan-and-obama-photo-hidden-since-2005/
When a scandalous news event occurs that involves Democrats, the DNC/MSM will bury it (e.g. Joe Biden’s dementia, Hunter Biden laptop from hell, etc), especially prior to an election. If a Republican is known to be in 1,000 mile radius from mentally deficient psychotic conservative, the DNC/MSM will shine a light on it brighter than the sun. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
ANTIFA are Nazis
ANTIFA are Fascists
ANTIFA are domestic terrorists.
The DNC/MSM/DOJ/FBI have no credibility and clearly the US Courts as well
It just isn’t worth reading the news anymore. It’s all propaganda just like in Cuba.
Estovir, try to find a picture of Kamala with Monel Williams as he has his arms around her and another woman at the same time.
Jonathan: Judge Van Rysselberghe sentenced Allisa Azar to 2 weeks in jail and 3 yrs of probation, rather than the 30 days the prosecutors wanted and rejected the request to make impromptu searches without a search warrant, He took into consideration that Azar was a first time offender without any previous criminal record. That belies your claim that Azar has a “long record of violence”. And just after sentencing and before Azar was taken into custody the Judge told Azar : “Good luck to you”. Which indicates Judge Rysselberghe didn’t think Azar was a continuing threat to the community.
What you also don’t mention is that three members of the Proud Boys involved in the same incident, Gordon Crank, Tommy Campbell and Barry Johnson, were also charged. What happened to them? Crank and Campbell both failed to appear for arraignment and apparently fled. Bench warrants were issued for their arrest but so far they can’t be located. Azar didn’t do that. She was willing to face the music and accept the consequences of her illegal conduct. But the Proud Boys are dodging the law because they don’t think they should be held accountable for their actions.
For years you have argued that Antifa is an existential threat to “free speech” and is willing to use violence to pursue its goals. The Azar case is not the case you want to use to support your claim. The real threat to “free speech” and our Democracy is not coming from the likes of Azar or Antifa. The real threat comes from events like Jan. 6, 2021 where the stormtroopers for DJT, the Proud Boys and the Oathkeepers, attacked the Capitol to try to violently overturn a legitimate election. It is those groups that have a “long record of violence”. Dozens of members of both groups either pled guilty or were convicted of serious crimes like seditious conspiracy. Enrique Tarrio is serving 22 years for his role in the conspiracy.
It was Jan. 6 that showed DJT is the real enemy of “free speech” by trying to deny millions of voters the free expression right to choose who they wanted to be president. That’s the part of “free speech” you conveniently ignore!
Germany calling, Germany calling…
For years you have argued that Antifa is an existential threat to “free speech” and is willing to use violence to pursue its goals. It was Jan. 6 that showed DJT is the real enemy of “free speech” by trying to deny millions of voters the free expression right to choose who they wanted to be president.
Yes Dennis, not the 2020 Election Season Mostly Peaceful Insurrection of Rioting, Looting, Burning, Pillaging and Murder carried out by your Soviet Democrat street thugs in Antifa – including their 36 hour long assault on the White House a couple of months before J6 in hopes they could kill President Trump before the election. And supported, endorsed, and praised by by both then former Vice President Biden and now Vice President Harris.
Can you remember the Biden battle cry during that, Dennis: A courageous group of Americans
Can you remember the Harris battle cry during that 2020 insurrection, Dennis: They will not stop before the election – nor should they. Help me bail them out
It’s stunning how you lie to your good friend Jonathan, Dennis.
Nice attempt to rewrite history from the jaundiced eye of someone who legitimizes the destructive agenda of one group (Antifa), while denouncing the protests of another (“stormtroopers”). By sympathizing with the anarchists, you unwittingly addressed the entire issue of Mr. Turley’s concerns documented throughout his most recent book. If it bit you in the ass, you still wouldn’t understand…
Yowsir!
Burn ointment aisle 9, 3rd degree.
Apparently comments with even admittedly juvenile insults to Democratic political candidates that contain no profanity, and do not in any other way violate the published rules of this space, are subject to deletion, as the subject comment (mine) was. The automated WordPress filters cannot be blamed for this one: that comment stuck around for many hours before being “disappeared”. That would appear to say something about the political biases about moderators here. Those who assume that the moderation is neutral might want to keep that in mind.
I had several innocuous posts removed yesterday as well. Sometimes I just repost them.
Not the point. It has been claimed that some of the posts here are removed by automated WordPress filters, i.e., an AI bot. When that is the case, it should happen almost immediately. Reddit has taken to letting Artificial Idiot bots patrol posts there, and posts deemed violations are pretty much removed in real time, whether there is any objective basis for the removal or not. I have to assume that whatever filtering WordPress uses would be similarly rapid. When a post hangs around for 6 hours or so, stimulates a couple of comments to itself, then gets removed, I think it’s defensible to assume that it was done by a human moderator in response to the content (especially if those chained comments remain). If there is an apparent pattern to the human moderator censorship, particularly if the content that moderator removed does not violate the published terms of service, I think it’s reasonable to question the motivation for that action.
Dennis. Dennis. Dennis. What are we going to do with you?
Because your posts make me shake my head and smile, I cannot say that I dislike you.
We just need to keep you on track.
(1) You criticize JT as follows: “He [the judge]took into consideration that Azar was a first time offender without any previous criminal record. That belies your claim that Azar has a ‘long record of violence.’”
Dennis, please read this report:
“The December 2021 indictment of Azar, a long-time regular at Antifa riots in Portland, sent shockwaves across Antifa cells and networks in the Pacific Northwest. Azar had been repeatedly arrested and charged at violent Antifa direct actions in Multnomah County, but was repeatedly not prosecuted [invoking the defense of “journalism.” But that started to wear thin when prosecutors showed actual video of her online Antifa activity and her violence…..] https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-oregon-jury-convicts-violent-portland-antifa-ringleader-alissa-azar-of-felony-over-2021-attack
Perhaps if you take issue, read the entire article above, outlining Azar’s previous Hx, as well as her REAL involvement as an ANTIFA activist promoting violence, –and take it up with the media source and article author, -not JT, ok?
(2) You say, “And just after sentencing and before Azar was taken into custody the Judge told Azar : ‘Good luck to you’. Which indicates Judge Rysselberghe didn’t think Azar was a continuing threat to the community.”
This one really made me smile, Dennis.
I don’t think either you or I have any inside knowledge of what Judge Rysselberghe was “thinking” when he said that.
Indeed, I will tell you from actual experience in courtrooms, in multiple jurisdictions {(waiting for my civil defense matter to come up on the docket–I did not practice criminal defense except in cases where I was recommended to someone}), that judges often say this or similar niceties, to project a non-animosity, non-acrimonious disposition of the case. You obviously, Dennis, are not in court very often (maybe never?)
(3) You say, “The real threat to ‘free speech’ and our Democracy is not…” (You even capitalize “Democracy.”)
Do you remember that the U.S. is a constitutional republic, not a true democracy?
Thanks anyway.
yours truly, lin.
Dennis McInliar was not, is not, and never has been a lawyer. What he is, is a pathological LIAR.
The day Dennis is a lawyer is the day I’m a goddam astronaut—Lt Dan
Dennis – Turley’s article says that the court ruled she was not a journalist becuase of video showing her asualting others.
Assault is a very serious felony. It is only 2 steps down from Murder.
two weeks is entirely inapprpriate.
J6 Defendants are serving long sentences for “assault” merely for putting their hands on the hand of a CP office – when NO VIOLENCE was taking place.
Far less serious than this women.
I do not know what you are talking about regarding impromptu searchs – that is NOT within the jurisdiction of the court. It is in the jurisdiction of probation and Parole. If you are on probation – your probation officer can search you at any time. They can drug test you at anytime. They can demand that you prove you are where you were supposed to be at anytime. If you are not – your probation is revoked and you serve the probation time in prison.
Judges typically lose jurisdiction of cases after sentencing. If there is an appeal – the jurisdiction shifts to the apeals court.
If there is no appeal – the jurisdiction is that of the prison system. Probationers can challenge violations in court, but the courts do not get jurisdiction until they do.
One the opposite side of things – it is VERY RARE for a probation violation to trigger a new criminal conviction. Someone on probation or parole as an examnple caught with drugs – just goes back to prison to serve the balance of their sentence – they do NOT typically get charged with a new posession charge, That is the NORM it is not however a legal requirement.
I have no idea if this woman is a first time offender. Nor do I beleive that you do. Regardless, this is an incredibly lax sentence even for a first offence.
I can assure you no one in my county gets 14 days in jail for ANY Felony.
You say that several Proud boys were charged – SO WHAT ? That is not a defense. That is 4yr old nonsense – “but he hit me first”.
Regardless, they were charged – we do not know what with. Could have been jay walking. If they were charged with something actually serious – Oregon can extradite them.
Regardless, the Proud Boys – Contra your left wing nonsense typically show up at Antifa riots to STOP the riots.
In much of the country they WORK with Law enforcement. It is only in left wing nut enclaves like Portland where they are treated as part ofg the problem rather than part of the solution.
Standing up to violent rioters like this woman is a GOOD THING – not a crime.
If the members of the proud boys actually committed a serious crime – they WILL eventually face the music.
My guess is that the charges were minor and they do not live in Portland, they likely had to pay bail to get released and the court is going to confiscate their bail and ignore them.
But as I said – if they actually committed a serious crime – failure to appear will just make things worse.
You do not note what they were charged with ? A summary offense ? A misdemeanor ? A fellony ?
These things are not even close to equivalent. Therefore WHAT they were charged with matters.
It is the difference between not showing up for a parking citation and not showing up for a violent fellony.
Dennis
Antifa is a threat to free speech -= because of their words and because of their acts.
They are a threat because theyt openly admit they are a threat. It is not like Antifa’s hostility to free speech is a secret.
But in case you doubt their words – they have violently assaulted and hospitalized many journalists trying to cover them.
They will violently violate the first amendment rights of others – not because they get anygry and lose control – but because they deliberately target people trying to excercise their first amendment rights.
Again this is not a secret.
Unlike you – some of us beleive that when someone SAYS they will violate the free speech rights of others, and thn actually DOES violate the free speech rights of others – we acctuarately GRASP they are a violent threat to free speech – just like they say they are.
“The real threat comes from events like Jan. 6, 2021 where the stormtroopers for DJT”
Did not see a single storm trooper. No one enter the capital with guns (except CP). They did noit even come with frozen water bottles – as is typical of the left. They did not come with fireworks, or lasers or molotov cocktails – all things common place at left wing riots.
So where are the stormtroopers ?
“the Proud Boys and the Oathkeepers, attacked the Capito”
Very very very few of either were actually at the capitol. I beleive only one member of the Oath Keepers – and not really a member, just someone who was tied with other oath keepers was actually at the capitol.
There was also no “attack” on the capitol.
Nearly all the protests were peaceful. By comparison nearly every BLM event was a war.
There was no violence on J6 at all =- until the CP at the west tunnel tear gassed themselves and then lobbed a tear gas grenade into a previously peaceful crowd.
That does not excuse the violence – either by thge protestors or the CP – but the FACT is NO ONE came with the intention of committing violence.
The trials of the oath keepers and proud boys – despite phony convictions did not present Evidence of any planned violence.
One of the reaspons for the ludicrously stupid 1512C claim is that the DOJ had to get arround the fact that while J6 was CLEARLY a planned protest,
it was NOT planned violence.
There was NO effort to overturn a legitimate election – that claim is stupid on its face. The final determination of the election is made by CONGRESS, and had not been made yet. YOU can not claim that congress will give their impramatur until they do.
The protestors were their to legitimately demand that congress excercise its legitimate power to refguse to certify an election they rightly beleive was fraudlent. Regardless, they are free to do so – even if they are wrong.
Protest, speech, assembly, petitioning govenrment are ALL first amendment rights.
The first amendment does not say – you can only protest elections when fraud has been proven to everyone – that would be absurd.
Rep Raskin is already planning openly to oppose Trump’s election in congress – is he an insurrectionist ? Of course not.
I doubt he will succeed – but he and anyone else is free tro argue that the election – whether of Trump or Harris should not be certified.
They can argue that for ANY reason at all. But to succeed, they will likely have to be persuasive.
I would further not the insurection nonsense is absurd.
If the election is not certified – it goes to congress – not the protestors. If congress does not produce a result the speaker of the house – at that time Nancy Pelosi becomes president until the matter is resolved.
David Rice Atchison a democrat from Missouri was president of the United States for one day as a result of congressional changes to the inauguration that resulted in a one day hole between the end of one presidents term and the certification of another.
Regardless, Trump ceases to be president on Jan 20, 2021 at noon, absent congress certifying him the winner of the 2020 election.
That happens AUTOMATICALLY – there is absolutely nothing anyone protesting at the capitol could do about that.
Absent Trump being certified the winner by Congress on Jan 20, 2021 at noon – everyone in the US government would cease taking presidential directions from Trump. No one in the military would listen to him, no one in the cabinet would listen to him.
He would no longer be president.
The left likes to talk about the peaceful turnover of power – that is NOT how the US operates.
Presidents do not pass the crown or the instruments of power to their successor. They merely cease to be president exactly 4 years to the minute after they were elected – unless they congress determines that they are the next president of the united states AND they are sworn in to office by the cheif justice of the supreme court at noon on the 20th of January. Further the subsequent president becomes president – when they take the oath of office.
There is no passing of the batton. There is no “transfer of power” – the constitution terminates the power of one, and it grants that power to the next president.
You could in theory disrupt the transfer of power – if you prevented the innauguration – but you can not do so by disrupting the certification of an election.
Even without any certification at all – there would have eebn a new president on J20, 2021 – and without congress certifying Him as the next president – it would not be him.
“try to violently overturn a legitimate election. ”
More left wing nut garbage – first there is no crime of “overturning an election” – elections are overturned all the time – efforts are made to overturn elections far more – and are rarely successful. Further the word legitimate is meaningless. The president of the united states is the person who takes the oath on Jan 20th. That is the speaker of the house – Unless Congress decides who the next president is – which they have always done – though NOT always selecting the alleged winner. There is no legal or constitutional requirement that congress certify any election. The FINAL decision as to whether an election is legitimate rests with CONGRESS – and there not only is not, but can be no rule or law binding congress to do so in any specific way.
“It is those groups that have a “long record of violence””
It does ? Howe so ? Even by your own ludicrously stupid claims there has not ever before been ANY effort at organized right wing violence.
We had violent riots through the summer and fall of 2020 – Antifa rioted in Portland every night for over 100 straight days.
Do you have instances of proud boys throwing molatov cocktails in occupied police cars ? Have they murdered anyone ?
Did they use lasers to blind the police ? Did they shoot fireworks at law enforcement ? Did they pour alcohol on a police office and light them up ?
What is this “long history of violence” you cite ?
The FACT is nearly everyone “convicted” of J6 crimes has NEVER had a prior conviction for anything – most have never had traffic tickets.
Many are current or former law enforcement or Military.
They are the OPPOSITE of people with long histories of violence – they are people with long histories of not merely following but upholding the law.
Stewart Rhoades was a paratrooper. A Yale law grad who won alcolades for a research paper challenging the Bush administrations policies regarding classifiying people as enemy combatants – he was angry with the erosion of rights under the Bush administration post 9/11/.
He clerked for an AZ supreme court justice before going into private practice.
He formed the Oath keepers specifically to create a body of people willing to stand up against efforts by the left to declare martial law and unconstitutionally take over the country.
He has absolutely no prior history of violence – in fact he has no history of violence at all. He was NOT convicted of a crime of violence.
He was convicted of conspiracy to commit sedition – a crime that is with certainty unconstitutional.
The US has had a long and dark history with vile seditions statues.
Sedition is challenging the established order – that is constitutionally protected in the united states.
Anyone can challenge the established order.
What they can not do, is use violence to do so.
To this date there is no evidence of any plan to initiate violence on J6.
What little violence there was is the consequence of incompetence by the Capitol Police.
That does not exonerate those who actually engaged in violence but it obliterates stupid claims such as yours that J6 was an act of planned violence.
That is deceiptful and stupid left wing lies.
“Dozens of members of both groups either pled guilty or were convicted of serious crimes like seditious conspiracy. Enrique Tarrio is serving 22 years for his role in the conspiracy.”
Again seditious conspiracy is an unconstitutional charge.
There are over 1000 people on the exhonerated list in the US – this is the people convicted of crimes who have subsequently been PROVEN to be innocent.
NEarly all of them plead guilty.
It is WELL DOCUMENTED that DOJ has been torturing J6 defendants in the DC metro jail trying to get them to plead guilty.
Do you have a single person – out of the thousands charged who has plead guilty to actual violence ?
Do you have any evidence at all of any PLANNED violence ?
Antifa plans violence all the time.
Kamalala doesn’t lie.
“I’m immutably against fracking, 2019.”
“I’m immutably for fracking, 2024.”
What kind of idiots is she fooling?
The Democratic kind.
1. Good article.
2. When taking flak, over target.
3. Pedantic point – sentenced to prison rather than jail?
Do you think as the pendulum swings back towards normalcy that the very treasonous and subversive actors high within the rank and file of our government that were/are attempting to overthrow our Constitutional Republic should go without being held accountable?
AG Garland’s speech today was FOS, Americans are not that stupid, the proofs are to be revealed and they can’t control the narrative anymore.
America should be for American citizens FIRST and then when a balanced budget can be presented and a National debt can be tamed, only then can she open her arms to welcome those that are worthy.
Trump is the keystone upon which Americans can begin to retake their Nation.
Attorney General Dangerfield
Thank you Mitch McConnell.
This was the second speech by Garland in a week; they are inappropriate so close to the election.
* The USA is now Sodom and Gomorrah and came in with the democrats and Obama. Vote Harris if you want to die.
Telling it like it is. Jawboning won’t do any good.
Did you say, “Sodom and Gomorrah?”
___________________________________________
“The left’s queering of Abraham Lincoln has begun in earnest.”
“LOVER OF MEN — a new documentary currently in select cinemas, and coming to VOD on October 8 — seeks to answer the question: Was Abraham Lincoln gay? The answer it comes up with is: kind of, maybe, sort of.”
– Davis Ng