Hillary Clinton is continuing her global efforts to get countries, including the United States, to crackdown on opposing views. Clinton went on CNN to lament the continued resistance to censorship and to call upon Congress to limit free speech. In pushing her latest book, “Something Lost and Something Gained,” Clinton amplified on her warnings about the dangers of free speech. What is clear is that the gain of greater power for leaders like Clinton would be the loss of free speech for ordinary citizens.
Clinton heralded the growing anti-free speech movement and noted that “there are people who are championing it, but it’s been a long and difficult road to getting anything done.” She is right, of course. As I discuss in my book, the challenge for anti-free speech champions like Clinton is that it is not easy to convince a free people to give up their freedom.
That is why figures like Clinton are going “old school” and turning to government or corporations to simply crackdown on citizens. One of the lowest moments came after Elon Musk bought Twitter on a pledge to restore free speech protections, Clinton called upon European officials to force Elon Musk to censor American citizens under the infamous Digital Services Act (DSA). This is a former democratic presidential nominee calling upon Europeans to force the censorship of Americans.
She was joined recently by another former democratic presidential nominee, John Kerry, who called for government crackdowns on free speech.
Other democrats have praised Brazil for banning X. For her part, Clinton praised the anti-free speech efforts in California and New York and called for the rest of the country to replicate the approach of those states.
Clinton added a particularly illuminating line that said the quiet part out loud. This is all about power and the fear that she and others will “lose control” over speech:
“Whether it’s Facebook or Twitter or X or Instagram or TikTok, whatever they are, if they don’t moderate and monitor the content we lose total control and it’s not just the social and psychological effects it’s real harm, it’s child porn and threats of violence, things that are terribly dangerous.”
Clinton continues to offer a textbook example of the anti-free speech narrative. While seeking sweeping censorship for anything deemed disinformation, Clinton cites specific examples that are already barred under federal law like child porn.
Despite the amplified message on sites like CNN, most citizens may not be as aggrieved as Clinton that she and her allies could “lose total control” over the Internet. The greater fear is that she and her allies could regain control of social media. The Internet is the single greatest invention for free speech since the printing press. That is precisely why figures like Clinton are panicked over the inability to control it.
If citizens remain true to their values and this indispensable right, Clinton will hopefully continue to face “a long and difficult road to getting anything done” in limiting the free speech of her fellow citizens.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
If Democrats believed forbidding abortion were in that party’s interests, abortion would be outlawed. If Democrats believed the LGB++++++ “community” posed a danger to that party’s power, Trump would be what stands between my freedom and a concentration camp. Democrats are the party of slavery, the KKK, Japanese-American internment, Jim Crow, inner-city ghettos, and racism.
What better way of demonstrating your staunch support of freedom and liberty than by supporting a war
to topple a dictator who is the antithesis of these things?
Benjamin Franklin would have disagreed with all of you Putin lovers, and time will tell that you were wrong.
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” – Benjamin Franklin …
Oh, was Benjamin Franklin a Russian citizen? Not one American is giving up liberty or freedom in regard to Putin. Benjamin Franklin was said to carry oil in the tip of his walking stick, as a Statesman he said it was to calm rough waters still. I don’t think Franklin would think risking nuclear war while our nation is bankrupt and our military in a diminished condition would be a good idea. You really are a dolt!
Has Putin ever done anything that could be considered Orwellian?
Hey Hillary, question for you….
“What’s it called when government officials sworn to uphold the constitution conspire, lie, spy, and slander to overthrow a sitting, duly elected president?
Is that a “threat to democracy”?”
What it is is a threat to Democrat-cy. That’s what it’s all about: the Dems – such as they have become at this point – have resorted to the bleats and brays we always used to hear from the Commies in order to keep themselves in power.
It’s called TREASON and is punishable by death, especially in a time of war.
No, it’s an insurrection.
Democrats accuse Republicans & Trump of EVERYTHING *they* are doing.
Their ideology instructs them to tell *you* what *they* plan to do.
Literally everything thing they accuse you of doing, THEY ARE DOING.
“the floodgate of lies” is coming from Democrats, Biden, Biden’s press secretary, Harris, Walz and their surrogates.
“the floodgate of lies” is coming from the Propaganda media.
“the threat to democracy” *IS* the Democrat party of today.
“the threat to democracy” *IS* Merrick Garland’s lawless, weaponized DOJ.
“the threat to democracy” is the weaponized government under the radicalized Biden regime.
I think the County clerk in Mesa County Colorado that was convicted of voter fraud is a Republican and avid trump supporter.
Why are you accusing Demos of what Republicans have actually been convicted of?
She was preserving evidence, and was lawfared.
The “threat’ that the likes of Clinton and Kerry and all the rest of them are really afraid of is the threat to Democrat-cy, not democracy. And to prevent that from happening they are making moves and bleats and brays that we last saw from the Commies back in the days of the USSR and all that.
Yeah, I think it can be surmised that anti-free speech crusaders are democrats.
According to the fake news & the Democrat party, everything MAGA = “Far right wing.”
According to President Biden all MAGA Republicans are “domestic extremists”…
Radical Democrats like Kamala Harris and Tim Walz are never called “Far Left wing”…
The *true radicals* on the Left are always referred to as Democrats. Just plain old Democrats.
Learn to spot the Propaganda.
All it takes is a few functioning brain cells, and the Propaganda reveals itself all too readily.
Children in restaurants shouldn’t be allowed to speak unless what they have to say is really informative and interesting, and not just constant, random outbursts and whining.
Children should not be allowed in restaurants to begin with.
Fly ball Dave
“Motherf**ker, I’m an American. That s**t doesn’t work on us.”
Matt Taibbi encourages Americans to DEFY authority while giving an epic speech at @RescueRepublic
In his speech, Taibbi flames John Kerry and other self-appointed “behavior police” while reminding Americans of their roots and what the U.S. was founded upon.
“America has the most useless aristocrats in history.
Even the French dandies marched to the razor by the Jacobins were towering specimens of humanity compared to the Michael Haydens, John Brennans, James Clappers, Mike McFauls and Rick Stengels who make up America’s self-appointed behavior police.
In prerevolutionary France even the most drunken, depraved, debauched libertine had to be prepared to back up an insolent act with a sword duel to the death.
Our aristocrats pee themselves at the sight of mean tweets.
They have no honor, no belief, no poetry, art, or humor, no patriotism, no loyalty, no dreams, and no accomplishments.
They’re simultaneously illiterate and pretentious, which is very hard to pull off.”
🟦🟦🟦
“The people who built this country, whatever else you can say about them, weren’t small thinkers.
They were big, big thinkers, and I mean that not just in terms of intellect but arrogance, gall, brass, audacity, cheek.
Kurt Vonnegut called the Founding Fathers Sea Pirates.
He wasn’t far off.
These people stole a continent from the King of England.
And got away with it.”
🟦🟦🟦
“To the people who are suggesting that there are voices who should be ignored because they’re encouraging mistrust or skepticism of authority, or obstructing consensus:
I’m not encouraging you to be skeptical of authority.
I’m encouraging you to DEFY authority.
That is the right word for this time.
To all those Snoops and Nosey Parkers sitting in their Homeland Security-funded “Centers of Excellence,” telling us day after day we must think as they say and vote as they say or else we’re traitorous Putin-loving fascists and enablers of “dangerous” disinformation:
Motherf**ker, I’m an American.
That sh*t does not work on me.
I’m not the problem. We’re not the problem.
You’re the problem.
YOU SUCK.
Thank you.”
🟦🟦🟦
One of the most important points raised during @mtaibbi speech revolves around the concept that our government is trying to change the essence of the American personality.
“Our government has moved past censorship to the larger project of changing the American personality.
They want a more obedient, timorous, fearful citizen.”
The government does want you to be more fearful, more timid, and more willing to comply.
Why?
All because they want to exert more power and control over you and your fellow citizens.
That’s what this is all about and what it has ALWAYS been about.
Stay defiant. Stay free. And watch the full speech! @BrotherMikeyX”
FULL SPEECH HERE
Jimmy Dore also spoke @ rally: “And now they’re using lawfare. Anybody who stands up against the establishment, they put in jail. And it’s not just in America, it’s international billionaires that run everything. In Pakistan, Imran Khan said, we don’t wanna go along with NATO wars, the people of Pakistan want peace. And that guy’s in jail now. Remember, they don’t ever censor lies, they censor the truth. Julian Assange was in prison, not because he lied, but because he told the truth about the war machine. And they can do it to anybody. They’re doing it to stop cop city protesters who are protesting the expansion of the police state. They use the same RICO statute and the same grand jury to prosecute them that they did Donald Trump. That shows you if they can do it to them, they’ll do it to anybody who stands up against the establishment. It could be me, it could be you, it could be Jill Stein, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, no matter who it is. They’re going to use lawfare and make you a f-ing criminal because that’s the name of the game today. So we have to stand up against it, and we have to stand up for everybody’s freedom of speech.”
That was a great speech! I read and then watched it (I subscribe to Racket News).
The fearful are much more easily controlled. The free and happy – and yes, we should all be as happy as possible, if only because nothing gives Them conniptions like our happiness – are much less tractable.
🚨ATTENTION FLORIDA🚨
PLEASE SHARE
Several coastal, deep MAGA counties in the FL West coast might be evacuated in the coming week.
They should:
If you have a mail ballot on hand
1. Fill it out, voting for Trump
2. First thing tomorrow morning, go to Supervisors of Elections office and hand it to the election staff
Do NOT put it in a mailbox as it might be flooded
If you did NOT request a mail ballot
1. Go to the SOE office first thing in the am
2. Pick up your VBM
3. Fill it out, voting for Trump
4. Hand it right back to the SOE staff
Since VBM have already been mailed out (we’re within the 30-day timeframe), they can do this.
This is critical in Collier, Lee, Charlotte, Sarasota, Manatee, Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Hernando since they’ll likely be in the mandatory evacuation zone.
https://dos.fl.gov/elections/for-voters/voting/vote-by-mail/?os=icxa75gdubczx&ref=app
“There is absolutely NO EXCUSE to fail to vote in this election.
Your forefathers bled and died to save this country from foreign tyranny. The same tyranny manifesting itself domestically now.
If it’s snowing, go vote.
If it’s raining, go vote.
If you’re not feeling well, go vote.
If your car blows a tire, then walk to go and vote.
If you break your leg, have someone drive you to go and vote.
ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSES.
Cutesy time is over!” ~dbongino
Bank Your Vote Early if You Can
I do not know the details of the absentee ballot laws in FL – but Better than VBM would be to Vote Absentee.
For that you go to the county election office, your ID and registration are checked, and you are given a ballot.
You go to a voting both and fill out the ballot. put it in an security envelope. and seal it. Put that in an envelope with your name, address and DL or SS# and seal that. Then you hand the ballot to election officials.
Mailin voting CAN NOT be secured. Absentee voting can be secured and comply with Secret Ballot requirements.
Thank you. I pased this on
Good old Hillary.
The woman that prostrated herself and our country at Putin’s feet with the “Reset” button.
The woman whose husband received obscene speaking fees from Putin and Russia.
The woman who was up to her neck in the disastrous Uranium One deal that sold our strategic uranium assets. Sold our uranium to who? Wait for it . . . To Putin and Russia, of course.
The woman whose campaign surreptitiously funded the infamous Steele Dossier. You know, the Dossier that fed Russian disinformation to our ‘law enforcement’ and ‘intelligence’ agencies so she could damage her political enemy.
No wonder Hillary is terrified of losing control.
Hillary, of all the ex-Presidents and also-rans, comes closest to being a full-on narcissist, IMHO. I include Bill and Donald in that comparison. She beats them easily. I claim this because she more than any of the others schemed criminal acts and coverups her whole career.
Now you might ask, why not Scranton Joe? I think Joe is weak, venal and way ahead of his skis as President, but those around him who have used his weakness and infirmity are more liable for subverting the federal government than Joe. I’m sure there are narcissists in that clique. If you voted against Joe, you were really voting against them.
And let’s face it, in the weakness and venality department, Kamala is Joe 2.0. That’s why they INSTALLED her.
The oligarchs are building an American shogunate right before our very eyes, and that’s why all these narcissists, like Hillary, are gaslighting us about disinformation. That’s exactly what narcissists do.
HRC. How long to we have to listen to this pent-up spewed venom. As she deconstructs through the years she seems to pass each parody of evil only to go to a worse one . I used to think of her as Grendel’s Mother but even she had motherly grief for her fallen waif. I think HRC has moved to a new phase in her parade of parodies.
I give you now the Queen Of Hearts. Reportedly her next column will discuss the proper application of the term “Off With Their Heads”. The world awaits what new horror she may wish to bring down upon us.
I think I now understand Bill Clinton’s desire to be almost anywhere else with almost anyone else.
“Sentence first, verdict afterward.” I call her (and have for almost 8 years) Mme. The Eternal Wannabe.
Be specific Hillary. Who is this “we” you speak of?
Turley continues to demonstrate willful ignorance on free speech. Hillary Clinton was referring to the aspects of social media that are NOT protected by the 1st amendment. Inciting violence is not protected speech, as seen on platforms like Telegram and ‘X’ during riots against immigrants in the UK. Calling for others to burn buildings while immigrants are still inside is NOT protected speech. Turley conveniently omits these details while criticizing calls to moderate speech that is deliberately inciting violence. By downplaying the distinction, he seeks to lay blame on Clinton’s call to address the problem of inciting violence and spread harmful rumors that affect immigrant communities. Private companies have the right to moderate speech as they see fit, just as Turley can moderate speech on his blog. It is well established that openly racist comments on his blog will be deleted, and swear words are not allowed, although there are clearly loopholes for getting them posted.
Turley has excuses for his actions, using third-party services to moderate speech allows him to avoid direct blame for any censorship that occurs on his blog. It’s the “censorship by proxy” that he seems to despise, yet he relies on it to maintain civility on his blog as much as possible.
Turley argues for censorship through moderation. He advocates for legislation and defunding of private rating companies that label conservative or libertarian sites as less credible. Turley criticizes the ranking of conservative-leaning sites lower than left-leaning sites, calling it viewpoint discrimination. However, this is simply exercising free speech. Turley considers indexes like the GDI to be censorship because they “encourage” people not to visit conservative sites, but ultimately the decision lies with the readers.It’s censorship to Turley because it provides people with the option to steer clear of a website or its advertisements. This is essentially the same freedom of speech that he consistently advocates for when it comes to social media.
“Inciting violence is not protected speech”
Correct – and the brandenburg test applies.
This requires that the speech to be punished:
That the speech Is an explicit call to violence
That the call is to IMMEDIATE violence.
That violence is likely to result.
The US has addressed this in the social media context already.
Those requirements above are difficult to meet online.
I would note that there was very little “rioting against iommigrants” in the UK – there were protests – and those protests were NOT against immigrants as much as a against government policies concerning immigrants.
The “Violence” was clashes between police and protestors or between protestors and violent counter protestors.
While the UK allows draconian speech restrictions – the social media speech that violated UK – but not US laws, did NOT cause the violence in the UK. Just as ProHamas posters writing Death to Israel or From the River to the sea did not cause the violent proHamas protests.
If you go out to protest – and you have the absolute right to do so for any cause good or bad.
YOU are obligated to continue to conform to the law.
You are NOT free to use violence against others except in defense of yourself or others.
When you do the threat must be immediate and clear and the response must be proportionate.
“Calling for others to burn buildings while immigrants are still inside is NOT protected speech.”
In the US if you are posting online – as opposed to standing infront of a building full of immigrants,
then calling others to burn buildings with immigrants in them IS protected speech.
Though that is NOT generally what those prosecuted in the UK for online posts did.
” Turley conveniently omits these details”
Given that you can not get those details correct – both in terms of what actually is unprotected speech in the US, and as to what actual unprotected speech occured, and as to what actual acts of violence occured, seems like YOU have far more of a problem than Turley.
Few if any posts prior to the protests and riots in the UK would violate US free speech laws.
Few if any posts in the UK called for actual violence – much less immediate violence.
Most of the violence occured when Police in the UK thwarted protestors right to protest or when counter protestors attempted through violence to do the same.
Those few people who engaged in violence that was not self defence – should be prosecuted for VIOLENCE – not speech.
Regardless of their politics.
SCOTUS in the US has been clear – unprotected speech MUST CLEARLY call for IMMEDIATE violence and be LIKELY to produce it.
The crime of incitement to violence MUST be construed extremely narrowly – it is not enough to beleive the speech is a call to violence,
it must be an explicit call to violence NOW.
Those requirements exist to prevent incitement to violence from being used as it is in the UK to thwart political speech that the government does not like.
the crime of “incitment to violence” is NOT a grage door that you can drive a truck through, it is a mousehole that only the most egregious of speech meets and can be criminalized.
Neither the court not Turley are “downplaying the distinction.”
They are making clear that all error must be on the side of allowing free speech.
I would note – Clinton was NOT “addressing violence” – she was addressing her/government loss of total control.
There is no “problem of inciting violence” – true incitement to violence is rare and there is no problem in the US prosecuting it.
allegedly harmful rumors are in the US protected speech. PERIOD.
“Private companies have the right to moderate speech as they see fit”
It is a bit more complex than that. Contracts are binding, and contra the left can not be changed unilaterally.
If you promise free speech – you must deliver it.
Whatever you promise in order to get people to subscribe to your service – that is a binding contract.
You can not rescind it unilaterally.
Separately in the US we distingush between authors, publishers, and conveyors of information.
Authors and publishers are responsible for their content – they can be sued for defamation.
Publishers therefore have for many reasons the right to censor what they publish.
But once you are excluded from liability for content – you are not a publisher anymore, you are a “common carrier”.
You are like the phone companies, and you may not censor.
Either SM companies have liability for the content on their platforms and can be sued for defamation based on that content – i.e. they are publishers.
Or they are immune from liability for that content – in which case they can not censor outside the narrow constraints of actually illegal speech.
“Turley argues for censorship through moderation.”
Beat that straw man to death.
“He advocates for legislation and defunding of private rating companies that label conservative or libertarian sites as less credible.”
Correct – if you receive government funding – you are a government agent.
Private ratings companies can do as they please – so long as they do not receive government funds.
If they do, then their power to limit speech is constrained just as governments is.
There is no loophole to the first amendment or ANY of our rights, that allows government to pay third parties to violate our rights in ways government can not do.
I would note that such ratings companies are subject to publishers civil responsibility for the speech they publish.
If you engage in defamation – a tort, you are civilly liable for damages.
If you engage in fraud for YOUR economic benefit, or to cause tangible harm to another – you are civilly liable.
If your speech is a deliberate attempt to cause another party to breech a contract – that is also a tort – tortuous interferance in contract.
As Media Matters is likely to discover in texas.
You do not seem to grasp that Free speech rights mean that you have near absolute right to speak without fear of Government censorship – directly or indirectly, or government confiscating your life, liberty or property as punishment for your speech.
Free speech does NOT mean you have no responsibility for the words you say.
What you say can enhance or damage your credibility.
What you say about others can result in significant damages.
Promises that you make in the process of securing a sale or subscription are legally binding.
You have this very bizzare and self contradictory idea of what free speech means.
Yet as I noted – Brandenburgh set the test for speech that constitutes incitement to violence.
The test is NOT arbitrary. It is both driven by reason and by historical experience.
There are a number of restrictions on speech.
These are NOT just made up.
They are the result of historical experience and logic and reason.
The restrictions on free speech exist because they INCREASE the freedom of speech for the most part, and increase freedom generally.
The problem with these indexes in not that they are not attempts to censor – private efforts to persuade others are perfectly legal.
The problem is these were government funded.
There is no loophole in the constitution allowing government to pay others to violate our rights.
“Screaming Lil Bow Wow,” what were your MOS, Awards, Campaign, and Theater, or is yours stolen valor “Tampon Tim” style?
Use an actual user name, Stolen Valor Command Sergeant Major Walz. Don’t just be dear ol’ Tampon Timmy From Bejing.
And provides the MOS, Awards, Campaign and Theater awards that you have – before listing and questioning whatever somebody else claimed to have. Which ones did they claim that you question?
Hillary & Kerry have taken their masks off . . . And, without a doubt, their truth is U G L Y .
During Congressional hearings in the aftermath of Benghazi it was odd hearing her speak of “her truth” rather than “the truth”. It appears she now wants control of all “truth”.
Biden/Harris Hardship Report – the Dark Side of the Biden/Harris economic plan
https://www.gasandgroceries.us/bidenharrishardshipreport
“The Biden/Harris economy has impacted some places more than others. Let us know some information and we will provide you with a custom Biden/Harris Hardship Report for your area.”
Im against the death penalty, abortion, euthanasia, and against all forms of extinguishing life from conception to natural death. If an individual or group of individuals pose a risk of life to others, then that is when their lives should be terminated if imprisonment can not be afforded them
Israel has the right idea against Hezbollah and the other groups Netanyahu listed yesterday in criticizing France’s Macron. Netanyahu rightly stated:
“Israel is defending itself on seven fronts against the enemies of civilization,” (Gaza, Lebanon, the West Bank, Yemen, Syria, Iraq and Iran). “As Israel fights the forces of barbarism led by Iran, all civilized countries should be standing firmly by Israel’s side.”
https://www.timesofisrael.com/macron-calls-to-stop-sending-israel-weapons-that-can-be-used-in-gaza-fighting/
Americans are also facing evil fronts against the enemies of Western Civilization: Democrats / MSM.
While preemptive killing is never justified, one gathers from the rhetoric from Democrats / MSM since 2016, that they are inciting and inviting (as recent history proves) to harm us.
Never forget how Maxine Waters incited Democrats to confront Trump supporters in public spaces, and other Democrats did likewise. Stephanie Wilkinson, co-owner of The Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, VA did as such to Sarah Huckabee Sanders and her dinner party in 2018. The Red Hen restaurant was eventually permanently closed and a new one opened in its place, “Zunzun”
IDF vows ‘no relief or respite’ for Hezbollah; 440 terror operatives killed in ground op
Army strikes Hezbollah command room embedded in mosque within hospital compound as troops continue raids in south Lebanon; 3 lightly injured by Hezbollah rocket
https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-says-400-hezbollah-men-killed-since-start-of-ground-op-as-it-pummels-terror-group/
I’m all in for the death penalty. The debt for the life they stole and the damage they’ve inflicted on others can only be paid for with the forfeiture of their own life. Incarceration to a murderer means nothing but a taxpayer funded life of three squares a day, no work, sleep when you want and integration into institutional life. The rest of your post, if it mattered, I agree.
Trump just said, literally, that Kamala Harris murdered people when she “let in” illegal immigrants. Aside from the fact that she didn’t “let in” anybody as it was just another Trump lie, Trump said the murder that an illegal immigrant committed is as if Harris loaded a gun and murdered them herself.
Prove that you’re not a mentally disabled conspiracy theorist by denouncing Trump’s rhetoric.
Kamala let in millions of lunatics, morons and limp dicks. Not saying you are one of them, but that Trans Man skank who kicked you to the curb in WeHo, yeah. Serves you write for what you did to me
Perhaps you need a civics lesson just like JD. The VP has virtually no authority. The only thing a VP can do is cast a tie breaking vote in the Senate. And of course if you weren’t aware, the House must pass any bill that the Senate passes for it to become law.
So how is this Kamala’s doing when she has no authority to do anything?
“Trump just said, literally, that Kamala Harris murdered people when she “let in” illegal immigrants. ”
Literally has a meaning – you do not appeal to know it.
Regardless. Trump is free to say that murders by illegals are the consequence of Biden Harris policies refusing to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.
You are free to decide that Trump is wrong.
Regardless, Democrats have NOT enforced our immigration laws.
They have NOT secured the borders.
And as a result tens of millions of people – including thousands of violent criminals have entered and subseqently committed violent crimes including murder.
Atleast Trumps claims of responsibility and causation do not require a time machine – like those of Bragg/Merchan in NY.
Of course Biden/Harris “let in” people.
If you leave your door wide open you have “let in” burglars and others.
Regardless those of you on the left make exactly these types of analogies all the time yourselves.
Whether from the right or the left the analogies are nearly always imperfect,.
But they are legitimate excercises of free speech.
You have deemed Trump’s criticism of Harris as too far and choose not to vote for him.
That is fine.
But you do not apply the same standard to speech by democrats – that is your right.
It is also immoral.
You do realize that after the myriads of false left wing conspiracies and lies over the past decade,
After the large number of “right wing conspiracy theories” that have proven true, that calling someone a
“right wing conspiracy theorist” is a compliment.
Why Am I going to denounce Trump’s statements ?
Harris IS responsible for failing to enforce immigration laws that would have stopped millions of illegal aliens and thousands of violent criminals from entering the US. For that Mayorkas, Harris and Biden should have been impeached and removed.
Regardless, voters arefree to find her culpable and to refuse to vote for her and even vote for trump.
Harris is Responsible for her choices. In this case what she is not is CRIMINALLY responsible.
She is absolutely politically and morally responsible.
So what exactly is their in Trump’s remarks that must be denounced ?
If Trump ACTUALLY directs the DOJ to prosecute Harris for murder – THEN I will denounce Trump for that ACT.
I am not expecting to have to do so.
The only political lawfare and censorship that actually occured when Trump was president was that of deep state democrats against Trump or his supporters. Are you demanding that I denounce Trump because DHS, CIA and FBI actors sought to censor Trump and Trump supporters ?
Clinton– If “they don’t moderate and monitor the content we lose total control.”
+++
The absolute best argument for NOT letting these ignorant and often stupid grifters, thugs, and totalitarians tear down the First Amendment AND the principles behind it.
Kerry and Obama and Biden and Clinton are political herpes.
Syphillis comes more to mind, herpes is luggage, syphillis kills and drives people to insanity.