Gettysburg College in Pennsylvania has been struggling for years with falling revenue and difficulty attracting applications. It has had to reduce faculty and even shutdown a historic journal to stay afloat. Students have raised the alarm of how their institution is “slowly inching toward a financial precipice.” In the midst of this crisis, the college is now facing a new controversy after its admissions counselor and representative for Long Island and New York City went on a tirade against any supporters of former President Donald Trump as “pieces of s**t.”
Lupe Lazaro previously featured on the college website as a “first-generation student” who came to Gettysburg and was wowed by being able to see stars: “it was the first time I’d ever seen the stars. I love the stars, but I live in New York City. On my bus ride home, I applied Early Decision immediately because I knew [seeing the stars] was my sign.” That feature appears to have been removed from the website but can be seen here at another site.
If the claim seemed a bit hyperbolic, it was downright restrained given her recent tirade on Instagram. Lazaro notes that “[n]ot all Trump supporters are xenophobic. But they all decided that xenophobia wasn’t a deal breaker.” She added that “homophobia . . . misogyny . . . rape . . . [and] overthrow[ing] democracy” are also not “deal breaker[s].” According to the conservative site Campus Reform, she accused Trump supporters of having little problem with “misogyny,” “rape,” “homophobia,” “xenophobia,” attempting to overthrow democracy or trying to “lynch the vice president.”
She declared that “You are no different than the piece of s**t human you stand behind.”
Pennsylvania is famously divided right down the middle between Trump and Harris supporters. Long Island also has some of the highest numbers of supporters for Trump in New York. It is difficult to see how some applicants would feel that they had a fair chance with the college if they are openly supporters of the former president.
The fact is Lazaro is just a counselor and her views should not be ascribed to the college. Moreover, I have long supported the right of academics to speak on social media and outside of their institutions, even when they espouse hateful views.
The problem has been a double standard that often seems to apply to controversial statements from the left as opposed to the right. As previously discussed, such statements include professors writing about “detonating white people,” abolish[ing] white people, denouncing police, calling for Republicans to suffer, strangling police officers, celebrating the death of conservatives, calling for the killing of Trump supporters, supporting the murder of conservative protesters and other outrageous statements.
We also discussed the free speech rights of University of Rhode Island professor Erik Loomis, who defended the murder of a conservative protester and said that he saw “nothing wrong” with such acts of violence. (Loomis was later made Director of Graduate Studies of History at Rhode Island).
Even when faculty engage in hateful acts on campus, however, there is a notable difference in how universities respond depending on the viewpoint. At the University of California campus, professors actually rallied around a professor who physically assaulted pro-life advocates and tore down their display.
When these controversies arose, faculty rallied behind the free speech rights of the professors. That support was far more muted or absent when conservative faculty have found themselves at the center of controversies. The suspension of Ilya Shapiro is a good example. Other faculty have had to go to court to defend their free speech rights. One professor was suspended for being seen at a controversial protest.
I just finished a debate at Harvard over that school’s lack of diversity among the faculty and the maintenance of an academic echo chamber. The vast majority of faculty today run from the left to the far left.
The difference is that Lazaro is the face of the college for new applicants and the snarling social media posts send a message of intolerance at the college. If you are one of those little Trump-supporting “pieces of s**t,” the controversy may lead you to think twice about applying.
I am still opposed to sanctions for students and faculty generally for social media postings expressing their political views. Lazaro is a representative of the college and has added obligations as part of that public role outside of the university.
As a recruiter, the college can ask for Lazaro to avoid public comments that denigrate or abuse groups of applicants. It can also issue a statement that these views are not those of the institution. However, it does not appear that Lazaro’s comments specifically referred to students or applicants and she should be allowed to be actively and vocally involved in this election.
It is admittedly a tough line to walk as an administrator, but labeling all Trump supporters as democracy-killing, rape-supporting, women-hating people is not exactly conducive toward drawing more applicants to the struggling school.
It does not help an already tarnished image for the school. Gettysburg College ranked a dismal 217th on the annual ranking of colleges and universities on free speech. The school is already viewed as intolerant of opposing viewpoints by many and this does not help. Yet, it will have to establish a clear guideline on how public comments are addressed on social media for admissions personnel.
As I discuss in my book, The Indispensable Right, the trust of higher education is at an all-time low. Academics are destroying our institutions with a culture of viewpoint intolerance and orthodoxy.
Gettysburg College is an old and revered institution. It is now struggling like many to maintain its faculty and programs. Administrators seem willing to do most anything but restore free speech and intellectual diversity as part of the appeal to new students.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
Truly, as an individual with 1st Amendment rights, you are free, as an American citizen, to say and post what you will. What the Bill of Rights does not guarantee is the reactions, responses and actions of others with regards to those utterances. Let the loony left state ALL of their unorthodox and pernicious concepts; let’s get them all out in the open for the entire world to see and then let them continue to defend their evil nonsense in the town square.
In my town, we just lost a long-standing liberal-arts college. My uncle went to that school, as did my father in his final year. In fact, my uncle was on the board of trustees for years before he passed. The school was not controversial in any respect, but it still failed for lack of funds.
I have no sympathy for Gettysburg College. You’d have to fire most of the faculty and administration to put an end to this hijacking of the institution, and that hardly would be encouraging free speech. Let Gettysburg College do what all leftwing organizations eventually do: commit institutional suicide. The Left is already wrecking our federal government. What is Gettysburg College by comparison?
“They didn’t build that,” but they sure think they have the right to ruin it for everybody.
Go woke – Go broke! The Admin team took the fork in the road and the fork ended up in their eye! Sadly, good riddance to them as an institution of indoctrination and they can be the newest poster child of what happens when you stray from your roots!!
Here the Good Professor and I differ.
If you rank 217 re “free speech” you have a real problem that demands action if you wish to proclaim yourself an institution of higher learning. The sheer fact that the University is ranked 217th PROVES “learning” is not taking place at that school and that the Counselor’s rants are just a symptom of that lack of learning. That she is still employed and that the school’s management remain employed clearly proves they….everyone of them….are not “learning” from the very fact they are ranked 217th.
Were I on the Board of Directors, Regents, or Trustees….that had the say so re employment….I would clean house right down to the lowest ranking individual that had a role in that ranking having occurred and replace them with people dedicated to maintaining the very highest ethical and moral standards at that institution.
There would be no double standard, there would be free speech, and yes….differing views and opinions would be not only tolerated but would be celebrated. The one thing there would not be is wishy washy dialogue that sought to excuse, mitigate, or deflect from the deviation from those standards as is going on right here in the article.
With freedom of speech comes responsibility for what one has to say and also for what one does not say….and more importantly for what one does not “do” when confronted with situations such as raised by the Professor.
Evil prospers where Good Men do nothing…..so Professor encourage some Good Men to do something rather than jaw jack about it.
Ralph Chappell,
I agree with your clean out the house sentiment, the problem is these people from the top down all think their un-ethical behavior is perfectly acceptable as long as it is their leftist point of view being expressed. Until there are truly people of the highest ethical and moral standards in an institution, they will continue their un-ethical ways. It seems the debate at Harvard point out that fact.
It seems that people like this person are consumed with hate, frustration and envy. Maybe it’s themselves that they hate? We’re placing people who are grinding axes with society in positions of trust and allowing them to poison the minds of our youth. Before the internet and social sites they were limited to their reach and wouldn’t readily reveal their hate. It’s important today that parents take an active part (a very active part) in the selection of schools they send their children.
On RCP no-tossup, Trump has extended his lead from 302 to 312 electoral votes. Of the 12 states RCP lists as battleground, Trump is leading in 9, Harris in 3.
I read an interesting statistic yesterday. It was that after Joe Biden’s debate performance with Trump, you know, the one that caused the Democrat poobahs to kick him to the curb and install Kamala Harris as their candidate, that debate where he displayed cognitive impairment in neon lights, that debate — that 54% of registered Democrats thought Joe Biden had won the debate.
Once people attach emotionally to a cause or creed nothing short of deprogramming will take them away from it. They simply cannot see any objective evidence running contrary to their attachments.
In this case, the patently unfair legal proceedings against Trump just reinforce their pre-existing “knowledge”, gained from nothing more than media propaganda, that Trump is a long list of terrible things — a long list of general labels such as tax cheat, misogynist, racist, etc etc. And now this knowledge they are convinced they possess is applied against anyone with a view of Trump opposing their own. These are people with an absolute belief in their knowledge of things they cannot possibly know at all. It’s a basis for lots of evil.
Bang your head against reality long and hard enough, and it is your head that breaks, not reality. Problem solved over the long term. Doesn’t much help those of us who are caught in the chaos in the meantime, unfortunately.
As someone who works with students who apply to college, this AOs statements are horrid. What she has basically said is that if she reads the essay of a conservative student (and maybe a Christian one) she won’t admit them. I will share her sentiments with my students.
Pleeze! Every high schooler applying to college in the last decade has known of this bias! Why do you think they all try to portray themselves in their
essays as either victims or martyrs? They know they have to get past the Orthodox Sorosian gatekeepers!
Anon–
I think you are right in saying college students now fabricate a dual school persona to survive to graduation.
I recently visited with a young woman, a house guest, whose views tended conservative but who admitted that she didn’t dare express them in class or assignments in her university in southern California for fear she would fail. She would pretend to favor DEI while, in fact, she was disgusted with it and the way it saturated every class, even math.
But I wondered how long you can pretend to believe something before you actually do. Or do you secretly begin to despise it as my young guest seemed to do?
A college is its people. Given the example of personnel in Professor Turley’s comment perhaps Gettysburg deserves to die. Not so much a question of free speech as of marketing.
Pretense is a dangerous thing, because it swells the ranks of believers who think you are with them, and further validates their beliefs.
Exactly. How many 1930s Germans do you think actually favored Hitler and his Nazis, vs the number who just pretended to? The Martin Niemoller quote is appropriate here.
The goal of many university students is primarily a credential and not learning.
They are reluctant to risk the true goal by expressing genuine opinions that are not in line with the accepted narrative.
In that sense, hiding your saner self is a practical thing to do.
Well maybe Gettysburg College has outlived it’s usefulness and this tirade that was quoted runs through much of the staff of the college. That might explain it’s failing status. I would take no action except to point out these apparent failings and try to help this college accelerate it’s descent to oblivion.
Gettysburg’s “admissions counselor and representative for Long Island and New York City went on a tirade against any supporters of former President Donald Trump as ‘pieces of s**t.’”
Wait for it, in 3, 2, 1 . . .
“Turley focuses on an isolated case to feed the MAGA rage.”
Leaving aside the implied ad hominem. At some point, countless “isolated” cases are a trend.
That’s right, minimize away, Sam! Lol! Only a couple
of dead girls, only a few Venezulan gang-infested buildings, only some rapists and murderers freed, only a few dead soldiers, only a few left behind in Afghanistan, only some governmental branches weaponized, only a select
group of American voices silenced, only a few allies stabbed in the back . . .
Learn to read…
“Learn to read…”
Glad someone can.
Reading for comprehension, unfortunately, is a dying skill. That disturbs me greatly. While it is obviously quite easy to print falsehoods, at least the printed word remains stationary while the reader seeks to confirm or debunk it. Video affords no such ease of verification. NTM that it was created and perfected largely as a medium for presenting fiction.
The real issue for Gettysburg is not whether or not to somehow mitigate the harm that these utterances are probably causing the school, but how and why they selected such an irrational, immature, imbecile to represent their institution in the first place.
I cut my teeth on the First Amendment as a news journalism major at Kent State University around the time of the May 4th shootings. Because I grew up 15 miles from campus, I knew students there as well as National Guard members from my hometown. My uncle was there with the Guard that day, as was another young man who would play a role in the event. My loyalties were torn, but the First Amendment was important. It still is.
But after nine years of being labeled, and this is not an exhaustive list, “a democracy-killing, rape-supporting, women-hating [person supporting] misogyny, rape, homophobia, xenophobia, [that] attempted to overthrow democracy or tried to ‘lynch the vice president’, fascist, racist, ‘piece of shit,'” a line has been drawn. I still love the First Amendment, but not when it isn’t applied equally.
Call it my Rubicon. I’ve come to differentiate between free speech and ideas but draw a tighter line on what I view as hate or violent speech. From other examples cited by Mr. Turley, it could be self-preservation.
I’m told words will never hurt me but sticks and stones can. Well, words that approve of sticks and stones can hurt me. My sympathies are no longer with the likes of Lupe or Gettysburg College.
Turley writes a post because some low level admissions officer told the truth? I guess “truth” is such a weird concept for Turley.
If Trump supporters don’t want to be labels as as democracy-killing, rape-supporting, women-hating people, maybe they should not support a racist rapist traitor lair felon fraudster.
Read the links. I suspect you are a proponent of death of those not agreeing with you. I’m starting to understand the feeling, I’m just not there yet.
Lee Thompson, your comment made me literally laugh out loud. Thank you for that. As for Sammy wishing death on others, he and his parade of sock puppets are the persona of the Grim Reaper. Theirs is a crusade to end life. Nonetheless, dont fear the reaper. Buy a cowbell as needed
You wouldn’t recognize the truth if it smacked you upside the head and said “look at me”
Turley writes a post because some low level admissions officer told the truth? I guess “truth” is such a weird concept for Turley.
Sammy claims it has the ability to tell truth from Democrat political lies!
Sammy, she told the truth just like Biden got 51 former and current intelligence agency officials to lie to you that the Biden Bribery Laptop was just “Russian election disinformation”? You bought that one!
Sammy, she told the truth just like Obama, Biden, Clinton, etc told you and the world that their illegally written “Trump Russia Dossier” was verified proof Trump was Putin’s bought and paid for stooge? You bought that one as well… still do!
Sammy, give us your best guess at how much credibility you have here for telling the truth?
My analysis is that it might be slightly less than that of this deranged hate filled Bolshevik Bytch.
Imagine if the RECRUITER had posts on Instagram saying something negative about supporters of trans surgery for minors.
Exactly.
Cut all federal funding and federally backed student loans to these institutions.
It’s not a cult. /s
Trump Derangement Syndrome is a real mental illness.
And those trumpistz have it bad.
OldManFromKS,
Read two articles saying if Trumps wins, there is going to be a serious mental health crisis. We thought when Trump won in 2016 the TDS was bad! Mental health professionals reported not only new patients but increased frequency of visits from previous patients. All suffering anxiety and depression because Trump was president. Imagine their TDS when Trump wins this election . . . fun, fun, fun!
According to the information provided, the student didn’t “label all Trump supporters as democracy-killing, rape-supporting, women-hating people.” She said those things weren’t “deal-breakers” which is absolutely true. Saying Trump supporters were no different than the POS they stood behind was excessive. I wonder if Turley reads the comments about Democrats on his own blog? Turley constantly message about the seemingly exclusive persecution of right-wing voices without having said a word about New College in Florida being molded in DeSantis’s image. Saying a student counselor is “the face of the college” to new applicants is quite the stretch from a couple paragraphs earlier where she was “just a student.”
The post was made on Instagram, not an official school site. Turley, the free speech advocate, seems to be trying to quash this speech he doesn’t like. Mitch McConnell is a great example of being able to support a “despicable” person, finding nothing a deal-breaker. Lindsey Graham thought he’d reached a deal-breaker but changed his mind after a couple of days. All Trump supporters know who and what he is, they just don’t care, which seems to be the point of the student’s Instagram posts. You’re punching down, Turley.
Enigma, the true genius, compares the CHIEF RECRUITER for the college calling 50% of the college’s home state population vulgar names with people that comment on this site???? This is what the left considers a good way to debate.
Hey Enigma, you are one of the people here that have this odd contrarian need to debate even the most obvious and egregious examples of left wing bias and hypocrisy instead of either just saying “yup, it is bad that someone in her position would be so closed minded and EXCLUSIONARY” or even JUST IGNORE THIS ISSUE and comment on the next one. Nope, the odd contrarians have a need to be on the opposite side of every issue no matter how wrong their argument is.
Posting “CHIEF RECRUITER” in all caps doesn’t make it any more true. How did you come up with that, in a vision?
Posting “CHIEF RECRUITER” in all caps doesn’t make it any more true. How did you come up with that, in a vision?
Posting your visions while claiming what she said was true doesn’t make it so.
Yes, we Trump supporters know who and what he is: a great American hero who loves this country and who will be the 47th president in one of the greatest political comeback stories of all time. And yes, even Trump haters like you, Enigma, will reap the benefits of having a great president like Trump at the helm of this country’s emerging Golden Age. A rising tide lifts all ships — even the haters & losers.
“she didn’t “label all trump supporters as democracy-killing, rape-supporting, women-hating people””, then you admit in the next sentence that she said “trump supporters are no different than the POS they stood behind”, but you dismiss it as being “excessive”. It’s not merely “excessive”, it’s the same thing. I disagree with your premise that what she said about trump was “absolutely true”. I’m not sure why you think he is a democracy killer (given how the Democrats have brought the full power of the government to bear against trump, as well as people that didn’t fall into line on covid), and I don’t believe he raped anybody (e. Jean Carol is a nut job) or that he hates women.
“and I don’t believe he raped anybody (e. Jean Carol is a nut job) or that he hates women.”
If only there were some way to determine based on the facts if a thing were true or not? Oh wait! There is! And Trump was found liable for sexual assault which the judge clarifying it was indeed rape. Believe what you will, I’ll stick with the jury.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/
So, you believe that judges and juries are infallible, and every courtroom result reflects incontrovertible fact? I guess we can eliminate a lot of wasted funds by scrapping our judicial appeals systems then.
I believe he’s guilty of rape and a jury backs me up. You only have the world of one of the biggest liars to walk the earth.
Enigma, if we take a jury of 12 from the conservatives on this blog, I think they could find you guilty of rape and child molestation if the law were bent, the facts untrue, and the judge was trying to get a conviction. But most conservatives wouldn’t. We have to remember that Democrats in the South lynched black people without evidence.
Most conservatives don’t believe in convicting an innocent person because they don’t like him or his color. They believe in the rule of law. You don’t.
You haven’t been listening to Trump, though to be fair, he isn’t really a conservative. Public trials and reporting have helped us see the evidence against Trump (when SCOTUS allows) and there’s plenty enough to know he’s all kinds of criminal.
Enigma, you are incorrect. I listen to Trump. However, you are correct in that Trump is not a conservative. There is no proof of criminality on Trump’s behalf, and as you can see for yourself, gradually, claims have disappeared, with more to disappear in the future. The claims against Trump only survive with a biased legal system, including the presiding justices. Higher courts will rule on the law rather than on political bias, where lawfare is the method you use when you claim Trump is criminal. This is not new for you, as when Trump’s father was accused 20 years before Trump was born, you felt such a claim instantly made Trump a racist. Of course, as usual, you were wrong.
Public trials and reporting have helped us see the evidence against Trump (when SCOTUS allows) and there’s plenty enough to know he’s all kinds of criminal.
Thankfully for Biden’s Uncle Tom, first Obama’s DoJ and now Biden’s DoJ have ensured his supporters and intersectional Uncle Toms have been spared having to confront the criminality of President Daddy-Daughter Inapproriate Incest Showers.
And first the Obama administration and now the Biden administration have ensured there will be no trials for Bribery Biden while they control the DoJ and their Trump haters like Comey and Wray are the face of the FBI.
Hiding rather than acting on 150+ Suspicious Activity Reports filed by banks with the Obama administration concerning bribes, influence peddling payments and money laundering from foreign nations into the Vice President’s office.
Filed long before Uncle Toms would use BBBUUUTTT… MUH TRUMP!!!! to defend their decision to vote for Biden who Harris TOLD THEM was both a racist as well as a rapist.
The Biden DoJ who appointed a Special Counsel to tell Americans Biden was guilty of decades of crime in office, long before Trump ran for office – but he was going to parole him rather than indict him while his boss was still president, because his Ouija Board told him no American jury would convict his boss.
Yep… works for Uncle Toms: “I don’t have to believe my lying eyes!”
@Enigma
You always pop up at opportune times. I do not have any reason to believe you are not paid, or even if you are actually, in fact, black. Some of us have seen this on repeat for years at this point.
Sorry to disappoint you, but no, the world does not actually run on racism, fear, or hate, and it’s a very sad person that believes invoking those things is the only way to win. If those are actually your true feelings and not just rhetoric – I pity you in a truly egalitarian society in which you probably couldn’t be paid to foment your personal angst. I suspect though, that you don’t actually have much of that anyway and just need some $$ and like the ‘notoriety’. Nobody cares. Not here.
I believe he’s guilty of rape and a jury backs me up. You only have the world of one of the biggest liars to walk the earth.
Biden’s Uncle Tom has a low IQ comprehension of the differences between the criminal and civil justice systems in this country.
But maybe not: he wants people to believe that entire proceeding was normal American justice – that she would have succeeded with that lawsuit in Oklahoma, Ohio, Kansas, etc – not just in Trump hating New York.
The CIVIL jury that DIDN’T find him guilty of rape. But did find him guilty of defaming her by calling her a whacko with her accusations. How DARE Trump deny being a rapist in that manner!
Biden’s Uncle Tom refuses to believe the woman who came forward with contemporary witnesses to provide a detailed description of how President Daddy-Daughter Inappropriate Incest Showers raped her when he was a senator and she was one of his aids.
BUT… he does believe a woman who can’t remember what year it happened, claims she was wearing a dress that wasn’t manufactured until years after the alleged rape, where it happened, etc.
The intersectional hatred of Biden’s Uncle Tom on display.
Biased judges used to hang blacks. I guess that makes you happy.
Trump wants to take us back. He said in a recent speech he wants to go back 300 years. Judges won’t even be needed for Black people.
Trump is an egotist who is given to bloviating. Not that politicians totally ignoring campaign promises and slogans once elected has ever been a rarity. The best way to predict what Trump would do as President in 2025 is to look at his previous term. That was far from perfect, but objectively it was significantly more positive than negative. I would only hope that he has been bitten hard enough by his practice of appointing Deep Staters/neocons to high office because they kissed his derriere sweetly so as to avoid doing that this time around. But even if he repeats all of his mistakes, the results would be far better for the present and future of this country than a continuation of the horrendous, malicious, mindless and self-destructive policies that have materialized under Biden-Harris. There is a crystal clear choice to be made 18 days from now. We don’t have a ballot option to whisk us off to some ideal, fairy-tale world. We can choose to vote for a candidate who offers a fairly good chance for this country to recover enough from its social and economic to at least stabilize its decline while hoping that better options materialize, or we can vote for someone who is figuratively going to dive right down the toilet into the sewer, and drag the rest of us along with her. It really is that simple.
Enigma, I don’t know how far back Trump wants to go, but he sees that we are gradually going down the wrong path. Should the time frame be shorter? I don’t know what context that was made in, but it is certain that you never pay attention to context.
Seventy one percent of Americans believe America is on the wrong path. We can look to the past for examples, inspiration, use those to move forward. We cannot withstand another four years of failed Biden/Harris policies. When asked, Harris said she would not change a thing of Biden policies.
Trump wants to take us back. Judges won’t even be needed for Black people.
Biden’s Uncle Tom repeats the 2012 accusation Biden made towards the feckless Mitt Romney back before Trump ever entered politics. “They gonna put you back in chains!”
Biden tells African-American audience Romney would put them “back in chains”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-tells-african-american-audience-gop-ticket-would-put-them-back-in-chains/
https://youtu.be/eniziNcyM5g?si=uySdVRBXA3FVJOyd&t=15
Same Biden that four years ago told his Uncle Toms that if they didn’t vote for him despite the fact he’s been a racist since his first days in office, then they weren’t black.
Not only did they vote for him after all that, but they’re still submissive party Uncle Toms.
Rigggght, he wants to put blackie back in chains right? Where have we heard this BS before? E Jean Carroll, and her dog vagina, sexy rape, laughable, derived in George Conways living room…watch what happens in a real court of law.
emigmainblackcom as Biden’s Uncle Tom posted this: If only there were some way to determine based on the facts if a thing were true or not? Oh wait! There is!
Better or worse than a woman coming forward in 2020 (years before the law was changed to make that legal action possible) to say Biden raped her – accompanied by seven contemporary witnesses?
Better or worse than in 2020, when the anti-Semitic would-by president, Border Czar Harris told the world that Joe Biden was both a racist AND a rapist?
Better or worse than a daughter’s diary entries being exposed in 2020, where she wrote questions of whether she became a drug addict and disfunctional sex pervert pimping women for her brother because of “inappropriate” sex showers with Joe Biden?
The “equal justice for all” of E. Jean Carroll (and her long history of accusing men of rape) in those New York courtrooms equal to that?
All that convinced you to vote for Joe Biden in 2020, Uncle Tom? Or was it Biden’s 2020 threat that if you didn’t vote for him, you weren’t black?
enigmainblackcom, intersectional black supremacist, Biden Uncle Tom and failed writer tried this All Trump supporters know who and what he is, they just don’t care, which seems to be the point of the student’s Instagram posts. You’re punching down, Turley.
Nothing like having Biden’s Uncle Tom give everyone an impartial, fair, unbiased analysis of what Trump is.
Meanwhile, in the same vein: All of voters for President Daddy-Daughter Inappropriate Incest showers, the Kluxxer who fought to keep schools segregated and said he didn’t want his kids in jungle bunny schools, the one who told enigmainblackcom in 2020 that if black Americans voted for Trump instead of Kluxxer Bidden… they all knew the history of racism and rape that Kamala Harris told them they were voting for.
Enigmamainblackcom… what a self-own.
Watching you pimp for Biden and the Democrat Black Poverty Plantation is like watching “Queers For Hamas” parading around with their signs pimping for the terrorists that would airmail them one way from the rooftops if they got their hands on any of the Alphabet Sex Pride Tribe.
I have visited many of the highest level colleges in the North East USA…the stuff you see is APPALLING
Segregated dorms, Safe spaces for every identity(well except for white boys), programs for Africa and WOKISM…, etc
END GIVING THEM AID!
Time to End Federal Aid and loan backing to colleges
They appear to be Fascist training institutes!
Whose student don’t PAY BACK THE LOANS we give them, because of THEIR WORTHLESS TRAINING!
The real basket of deplorables (piles/pieces of sh**t) here are weak college administrators that cannot execute firm decisions in favor of the Constitution of the United States. In gross terms, they support preferred sh**t but deny others.