With all of the coverage yesterday of the heated arguments in Mahmoud v. Taylor, one order of the Court was likely overlooked. It appears that elderly Americans will not be deported as Alien Elderly Americans. At the request of the A.A.R.P., the Court agreed to change the name of A.A.R.P. v. Trump to W.M.M. v. Trump.
The case is a pending class action lawsuit seeking the protection of alleged Venezuelan gang members facing deportation under the Alien Enemies Act.
The original captioning was a pseudonym used by one of the parties. That did not go over well with the organization.
“Unsurprisingly, this litigation has already received attention from the press and social media. It will surely continue to do so. AARP is concerned that the nomenclature adopted by the caption of this case will create substantial confusion among journalists and the public. Indeed, in the 72 hours since the litigation was filed, it has already resulted in numerous misplaced inquiries to AARP. Both the ACLU and AARP are prominent advocacy organizations on federal policies, albeit in very different domains.”
While many retirees are moving to El Salvador and other countries in the area, the original captioning suggested a more involuntary relocation. With a court composed of AARP-qualified members (Barrett and Jackson are in their 50s but still can join), the Supreme Court decided to remove any question that this was a case about deportations under some mysterious Alien Elderly Act (AEA):
The AARP, a nonprofit entirely unrelated to this case, seek leave to intervene to request that the petitioner A.A.R.P.’s pseudonym be changed to A.R.P. and that the case caption be styled as W.M.M., et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al. The petitioners and the respondents do not oppose the AARP’s motion….
The Court construes the motion to intervene as an agreement by the existing parties to amend the styling of the case caption. Accordingly, the Court amends its prior order granting the motion to proceed under pseudonyms and orders that the petitioners are permitted to proceed under the pseudonyms A.R.P., W.M.M., and F.G.M. [not to be confused with FGM -EV]. In addition, the Court orders that this case will hereafter proceed under the case caption W.M.M., et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al.
The change should come as a relief given the claims on the left that Trump is planning to “disappear” journalists, homosexuals, and members of Congress. Just last week, MSNBC host Symone Sanders-Townsend declared, “To be very clear, it’s going to be the people of color, and vulnerable communities that are next in line.”
That apparently will not include the elderly, including the justices themselves who will be allowed to remain to rule in what is now W.M.M. v. Trump. However, Women Moving Millions (WMM) may not want to make any long-term plans.
At the request of the A.A.R.P., the Court agreed to change the name of A.A.R.P. v. Trump to W.M.M. v. Trump.
Indeed, Professor Turley! To quote your fellow lawyer, now District Court Judge James Wesley Hendrix, gifted with black robes that conferred transitional Executive Branch Judicial Powers on the District Courts Judicial Branch:
“In addition, the Court orders that this case will hereafter proceed under the case caption W.M.M., et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et. al.”
So Professor Turley: any words of comment to explain how a District Court can first agree with Democrats that criminal Illegal Alien members of a terrorist designated foreign murderous crime cartel are actually members in good standing of the A.A.R.P. as their lawyers lied to him in his court that they were?
(BTW, an organization of which I’m a dues paying member and never heard our organization was offering sanctuary and assistance obtaining American citizen benefits to murderous foreign criminal Illegal Aliens)?
And then having agreed that these few appellants are in fact members of our organization, then ruled that they were actually a class action lawsuit requiring him to provide relief aka sanctuary?
And no more from his lips about the Democrat lawyers who committed perjury in his court room to his face, than Judge Boasberg said or did after allowing Obama to send his Attorney Generals and FBI Directors into his FISA courtrooms to turn them into the original Democrat Political Courtroom Perjury Factories?
Followed by, after learning perjury had been committed to his face in claiming they had membership in an identifiable group (the A.A.R.P.), decided that didn’t change a thing: just change the title of the action and nothing else changed. So the still anonymous criminal Illegal Aliens, outed as liars to his court as claimed membership in an identifiable group, the A.A.R.P., STILL constitute a group that qualifies him to call this a class action lawsuit.
Seriously? Are ALL criminals in the USA, Illegal Alien or not, considered to be a class action group when one or two of them show up in court seeking sanctuary from law enforcement action and sanctions, actually a group qualifying for and requiring nationwide sanctuary from District Judges?
How does that work, Professor Turley?
It has been proven beyond dispute by even the execrable, slimy, Dennis McIntyre that elderly Soviet Democrat politicians are well above any criminal law – in particular, their political leaders like President Autopen Joe Biden, Formerly Known As The Oval Office House Plant, and Bill Clinton, Formerly Known As White House Blowjob Perjury Bill.
So why wouldn’t any of their Guest Democrat Voters i.e. Illegal Aliens that can be designated as “elderly” be also exempt from prosecution?
Mentioning AARP brings up memories of the COVID era when Democrats tried to kill off all of the elderly with lockdowns and spreading the COVID virus in nursing homes. This explains how Buydem’s brain malfunction was due to the way his handlers spread COVID in nursing homes.
But yeah AARP
Jonathan: In your haste to be cute or mocking of the restyling of AARP v. Trump to WMM v. Trump you got all confused. You say “With all the courage yesterday of the heated arguments in Mahmoud v. Taylor, one order of the Court was likely overlooked”. FACT CHECK: The “Court”, i.e., the Supreme Court is not yet involved in WMM v. Trump. This case is not on the docket of the “Court”. The change in the title of the case was made by James Wesley Hendrix, US District Court Judge for the Northern District of Texas in Abilene who presides over the case–not the Supreme Court. Haste makes waste!
THE North American Continent Is Under Siege
They pour into Mexico by Land, Sea and Air,
They pour into Canada by Sea and Air,
They pour into the United States anyway they can.
They Come from all over the World,
They come to North American Continent from Over-Populated areas to Over-Populate, Our area.
It is an Invasion of an At-Large Population pouring in to the North American Continent.
This is an ongoing multi-generational War.
By the time the Courts “WAKE UP” [!], it will be to late.
Now is the Time for Action.
WE are Under Siege. Defense Defense Defense ….
We Must Protect The North American Continent. 🇺🇸
Border Czar Says 68,000 Illegal Immigrants Arrested So Far, More To Come
Approximately 68,000 illegal aliens were arrested inside the United States over the past three months, Tom Homan, designated the border czar by President Donald Trump, told reporters at the White House on April 23.
“And we’re going to continue, despite what the district court says,” Homan said, referring to ongoing legal battles surrounding Trump’s deportation orders.
U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein issued a ruling on April 9, which he extended on April 22, blocking the federal government from utilizing the act, citing a lack of legal protection for the accused.
By: Tyler Durden ~ Wednesday, Apr 23, 2025
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/border-czar-says-68000-illegal-immigrants-arrested-so-far-more-come
WE are Under Siege, We Must Protect The North American Continent.
This is a call for a United Front 🇺🇸
AARP = the Bill & Hillary Clinton – Barack Obama Lobby Group. Nuff said.
The Old ones were the very ones that ‘invited’ the younger new ones into the Country.
“Hey! – come on in, the waters fine her in the U.S.A..”
Bring the grand-kids with you or have an anchor baby or two!
All aboard the AARP NGO USAID Train to the Frontero!
So happy to read this. Yesterday, I was forced to read the lawsuit and was like, please tell me what standing AARP has in this? And whoever came up with the AARP acronym for the plaintiffs needs Cher to smack them on the side of the head, like Snap Out Of It! You did not realize there’s a real AARP? {EYEROLL}
This one is takes the cake. It’s like reverse-Mao: in other countries the modern left has almost openly declared that the elderly are to be disposed of like garbage; there is nothing resembling sanity or shame remaining on the modern left, and is often stated, we do not hate our media enough. it was always preposterous, but fear mongering is quite literally all they’ve got now, I mean, that’s it – and I point to the comments here from trolls as evidence. Not an ounce of salience or sense in *a single one of them*. Not one. This is what we are up against, and generationally, far too many have taken it in like a sacrament.
We have been in a civil war for some time now; it’s just that in 2025 the muskets are dollars and influence, and you’d better believe the modern left knows it, it’s why they hate Musk: he is richer and more connected than them. They don’t go after his life, they go after his wealth and reputation. It’s what makes DOGE so important, and it is the only way we ever get peace back – marginalization, in the extreme.
Too Much. Can I take my dogs with me when I get on the plane? Dogs have rights too…
Hold on a minute there, big fella. I’m 2,438 years old. Age before beauty, ya know.
And still collecting So-So Security?
Why were they even allowed to be anonymous?
They’re not minors or wards of a guardian like Britney Spears was!
The Trump administration has already said they want to deport US citizens to El Salvador. That is very illegal and should scare everyone.
Only the babies… fetuses to save them from a short life at Planned Parenthood. AARP… UnitedHealthcare are using the WMM front to hide their identity and to sustain the kleptocracy that threatens the viability of granny and all citizens generally.
Cite the direct quote from Trump, please – and dot a source from media.
he can’t. his TDS only allows him to see red, and red is always bad, unless its chyna or soviet, in which case red is good
“‘The homegrowns are next, the homegrowns. You’ve got to build about five more places,” Trump said to Bukele, an apparent reference to prison space that would be needed in El Salvador to house U.S. citizens.'”
‘”We always have to obey the laws, but we also have homegrown criminals that push people into subways, that hit elderly ladies on the back of the head with a baseball bat when they’re not looking, that are absolute monsters,” Trump told reporters during Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele’s visit to the White House.’
So, the MSM putting words in people’s mouths, like always.
You can go find the recordings yourself.
So, what is wrong with containing savage evil while keeping the public safe? Where and how we deal with people who threaten our safety is far more important than the comfort of convicted criminals
Deporting US citizens is illegal in all circumstances. And given the disdain Trump has for due process, you can be sure he will send innocent citizens there.
If youre on that list for deportations, make sure to take some lube with you. Then again if youre sent to El Salvador, the men in prison there might want to keep away from you because they might fall in your backside considering your hole is as loose, wide and deep as the Mariana Trench
Franke said: The Trump administration has already said they want to deport US citizens to El Salvador. That is very illegal and should scare everyone.
Time for you to back up your lies, Franke: you claimed that the moment Trump was inaugurated he would swiftly round up Marxist Mainstream Media “journalists”, Democrat politicians and operatives, and Marxist Useful Idiot Democrat voters like yourself and either execute them on their front doorsteps, or intern them in concentration camps.
It’s been three months since inaugration and your lies/claims about what Trump would do back then Franke:
Can you provide us with a list of some of the names of your fellow propagandists in the media, talk show hosts, Democrat politicians, etc that Trump has executed or sent to concentration camps as you claimed/lied would happen after he was inaugurated?
Or were you just trying to scare everyone?
Study more of what you say. You are not scary enough to convince others of your lies.
I was replying to Franke
Unfortunately, deportations of all ages, colors, sizes, and shapes of people from Guam will remain unaffected…even though extreme danger persists that due to so many deportees the island of Guam will tip over.
Noone
So funny!
This posting seems to be based on Eugene Volokh’s (The “EV” suggests as much) posting on the same subject and attribution should be acknowledged.
OMG. I could have come under the auspices of this legal nitemare. I guess I can now cancel my trip to the tattoo parlor. I was afraid that if I showed up in El Salvador or Venezuela without the appropriate tattoos I would be in deep s—t.
WMV-women moving millions-thats a new one. I wonder what their tattoos are.
My wife is a member of WMM. Their tat is $10^6.
Tubwater-Thanks, I’ll have to explore that. I Better correct my note. WMM is the correct and my WMV was incorrect.
Think “Hawk Tuah”
While this story is amusing, this issue is not. I sure wish the professor would pen a few words about the rushed Friday night ruling which, as Justice Alito pointed out in his dissent, had some very unusual elements if not in the majority opinion itself, in the circumstances in which it was released, namely:
– The sheer speed at which it happened- 8 hours, quite a departure from SCOTUS’ normal snail’s turtle’s pace.
– Before the two lower courts had acted.
– In the absence of government rebuttal to the ACLU’s “emergency appeal.”
– The treatment of this group as a ‘class’ when no such thing had been established.
– In ignorance of the government’s written assurance that no deportations would occur while the ‘appeal’ worked its way through.
– That TRO’s are supposedly not ‘appealable.’
– That SCOTUS thwarted its own established procedure.
Don’t forget that a mandatory bond was never required to be posted as well.
As a 71 year old non-American, currently spending time in Florida, it’s good to hear this. Of course, it’s just another mark of the idiocy of the left that they could actually believe this foolishness.
should this article been filed on April 1?
Whew – that’s a relief. Guess I can unpack now
Not so fast.
I demand that the Court compel the Trump administration to pay for my self-deportation to Tuscany. With a modest stipend for essentials like wine, cheese, and prosciutto.
Care to join the Class?
If you live in or near any major city in the U.S., you could certainly demand relocation due to “fear of gang violence.” And if you own a MAGA hat or drive a Tesla, you could likewise request relocation due to “fear of political persecution.” Since foreigners are allowed to game our lax asylum laws, it’s high time that American taxpayers are afforded the same benefits.
Hold on a minute there, big fella. I’m 2,438 years old. Age before beauty, ya know.