The Usual Suspects: Disclosure on the Scuttled Clinton Foundation Investigation Reveals Familiar Names

As the Trump Administration finally releases the underlying documents related to prior scandals and investigations, the public has learned a great deal about the origins of the Russian collusion investigation and other subjects. This week, another document was released explaining why the investigation into the Clinton Foundation seemed to go nowhere. What is less surprising are the characters involved in shutting down the investigation. It is, as Claude Rains would say, “the usual suspects” from former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates to former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe.

Many of us had written about the allegations of influence peddling by the Clintons. While Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, the Clintons raked in hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign sources. Clinton Foundation officials were shown to have intervened for donors at the State Department. Those funds were used not only for the Clinton Foundation programs but also for travel and support for the Clinton family members. (Tellingly, donations reportedly plummeted after Clinton left office).

What is striking is that officials who relentlessly pursued Trump and his associates on little evidence were reportedly opposed to aggressive efforts involving the Clintons.I was one of the loudest critics of Sally Yates, who ordered the entire Justice Department not to assist Trump on immigration efforts after his inauguration. In my view, Yates’s conduct (just days before she was scheduled to leave the department) was a raw political move that shattered standards of professional conduct. It would also make her a heroine on the left and in the media.

Ultimately, Trump prevailed on the underlying claims of authority raised in the immigration orders before the Supreme Court.In these documents, Yates is shown in an email shutting down the investigation into the Clintons. Despite findings of good cause for further investigation into these allegations of pay-to-play corruption, Yates (then-Deputy Attorney General) is quoted as saying, “Shut it down!”

FBI Director Kash Patel released a memo showing a timeline of the interference, including the message from Sally Yates, whom Trump fired as acting attorney general. McCabe, who is now a CNN contributor, is again shown intervening in a crushingly predictable way.

The declassified timeline revealed that as early as February 2016, the Justice Department “indicated they would not be supportive of an FBI investigation.” The timeline also shows that, in mid-February 2016, McCabe ordered that “no overt investigative steps” were allowed to be taken in the Clinton Foundation investigation “without his approval” — a command he allegedly repeated numerous times over the coming months.

[…]

The timeline detailed how Yates ordered one of the federal prosecutors to “shut it down,” likely in the March 2016 timeframe. Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and Eastern District of New York (EDNY) purportedly said in August 2016 that they “would not support the investigation” into the Clinton Foundation, according to the timeline, and that “no explanation was given.”

Special Counsel John Durham found that the FBI’s Little Rock and New York investigations “included predication based on source reporting that identified foreign governments that had made, or offered to make, contributions to the Foundation in exchange for favorable or preferential treatment from Clinton.” Nevertheless, the FBI  timeline stated that DOJ “indicated they would not be supportive of an FBI investigation” on February 1, 2016.

For those of us who closely followed these investigations and wrote about them, this is hardly surprising but still very valuable for historical purposes. The consistent efforts of figures like McCabe only magnify concerns over the role of key figures in pushing investigations of Trump while discouraging investigations of top Democrats.

Once again, the media is largely ignoring the disclosures. The same reporters who exhaustively pushed the false Russian collusion claims have little interest in these countervailing disclosures. As with the conduct of Yates and McCabe, that is also an all-too-familiar pattern.

228 thoughts on “The Usual Suspects: Disclosure on the Scuttled Clinton Foundation Investigation Reveals Familiar Names”

      1. “No chance that these guys got grades as high as C in high school.”

        At least they finished high school, unlike Gigi here, who had to drop out due an “incident” involving the shop teacher and the loading dock foreman.

  1. *. Thank you, PT, I enjoyed reading the posts. The comments have turned into a depraved cesspool.

    It’s possible to just read the articles and skip the comments. Fyi

    1. I agree the Professor should get rid of the comment section. It’s become a haven for trolls, bots, and constant attacks on others.

      1. A bit of moderation would do wonders. The Gigi troll isn’t that hard to clean up from, if anyone just took the time to do it.

        1. Rabble:
          Agreed. Unfortunately, the moderators seem to be 1A to a fault, only cleaning up spam bot posts. When a comment thread goes off the rails as much as the 5:51 PM one here (and yes, I know it’s all 1 person, then 1 person replying to that 1 person), the moderators should step in and get rid of it. A first-time viewer of this site will see that, think the whole thing is insane, and leave, resulting in lower retention/view numbers.

          1. You are absolutely correct.
            That thread at 5:51 is completely uncalled for and out of line.
            I don’t know where these leftist people get the idea that they have the same 1A rights as us.
            We all know that the Constitution only applies to right thinking people like us.

            When I drafted the First Amendment I made it perfectly clear that is does not apply to leftist libtards.

  2. Thanks to the Professor and the site for continuing to cover all of this so diligently.

    The sheer corruption of the past nearly 20 years in our government is something to behold, and it came largely, though not exclusively, from the left. Just astonishing. I would love to see consequences but am not holding my breath. Watergate was child’s play by comparison – our modern left are just unconscionable, from top to bottom. Unbelievable, and yet right in line with many of our suspicions, particularly since 2020.

    I do not want a one party system, but these people need to never be anywhere near levers of power again; if there are any sane dems remaining – the time to take a stand is right now. Everything many of us have thought since at least 2008 has been proven accurate. We no longer have the wiggle room to be recalcitrant.

    The generational damage (even over the past four or five years) will take further generations to fix. At least we have made a start; we have to keep that momentum going.

    1. “if there are any sane dems remaining – the time to take a stand is right now. Everything many of us have thought since at least 2008 has been proven accurate. We no longer have the wiggle room to be recalcitrant.”

      You’re talking to members of a cult. They’re willing to sterilize their own children, for god’s sake. Good luck getting them to admit that they’re wrong about anything.

      1. @Anonymous

        I don’t disagree, and it is very concerning. I am hoping we can marginalize them to the point it no longer matters going forward. That is going to require every one of us that actually pay attention and care to do our level best, at the polls and in everyday life.

    2. James
      Agree! Absolute power to either party will devolve into corruption absolutely. What appears to have happened in my lifetime is the continued failure to enforce the law. The monet pouring in to politicians pockets from the lobbyists has corrupted the entire system. Unfortunately, I believe the only thing that will correct this is the populous finally having enough and the physical removal of these corruptocrats. A new generation of campaign funding, term limits and judicial reforms would get us down the road until the corruption begins anew…human nature.

    3. The plot is transparent. Look at nations globally as criminal neighbors like a neighborhood. If you want money Where’s the attack? The US for money and robbery of course. Figure in other rich nations not attacked, Saudi Arabia. Add in Islam. Take out US and disseminate Islam. What do we know?

      The internal bad actors have been identified. Those bad actors have money now after the robbery. What’s your next move?

  3. It’s too bad that the low-IQ anonymouses don’t realize that everytime they post, they are adding to the number of visitors to Turley’s blog, which, as you know, are compiled annually for rankings.
    Number of hits aren’t separated by merit. Those literal fools!

    1. @Anonymous

      I’ve had the same thought. The idjits are actually helping the site. It all gets indexed by Google etc., and AI algorithms are indiscriminate in their scraping. 😂

  4. I see that Gigi is spazzing out all over the comments today. Girl, you were supposed to save that meth for tonight. How else are you going to stay awake to provide your “service” to the after party at the used car salesman convention?

  5. BREAKING:

    Sean Dunn, accused of throwing a sandwich at a federal officer, is released on his own recognizance as the judge finds the felony charge excessive.

              1. You tuckered out yet, Gigi? You ready for a visit from the sandman? Or whatever you call your pimp, it’s really not any of my business.

    1. You think this is funny????
      That cop almost died,
      Luckily the cop’s bullet proof vest stopped the high velocity 50 caliber sandwich

        1. If, if, if, if.
          Always with the irrelevant “if” as a MAGA response.
          If pigs could fly, we would all be covered in pig sh!t.
          Think about that “if” instead.

    2. The singular American failure is the judicial branch, with emphasis on the Supreme Court.

      The judicial branch never met a law that was pro-Constitution and anti-Communist that it liked.

      The judicial branch believes it possesses a power to arbitrarily amend statutory and fundamental law, which it refers to as “interpretation.”

      Article 2, Section 4, impeachment and conviction must enjoy legislation to enhance and accelerate its process in support of the “manifest tenor” of the Constitution.

      1. MANIFEST TENOR

        “…courts…must…declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void.”

        “…men…do…what their powers do not authorize, [and] what they forbid.”

        “[A] limited Constitution … can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing … To deny this would be to affirm … that men acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.”

        – Alexander Hamilton

  6. Did you say, “Sally Yates, Andrew McCabe, and Hillary Clinton?”

    “The Gang’s All Here!”
    __________________________

    “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

    – Barack Obama
    ___________________

    “We will stop him.”

    – Peter Strzok to FBI paramour Lisa Page
    _____________________________________________

    “[Obama] wants to know everything we’re doing.”

    – Lisa Page to FBI paramour Peter Strzok
    _____________________________________________

    “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before 40.”

    – Peter Strzok to FBI parmour Lisa Page
    ____________________________________________

    “People on the 7th floor to include Director are fired up about this [Trump] server.”

    – Bill Priestap
    ________________

    “I had a discussion with the case team and we believe there to be predication to include former President of the United States Donald J. Trump as a predicated subject.”

    – Timothy Thibault to John Crabb, U.S. Attorney’s Office, D.C.
    ___________________________________________________________________

    The Obama Coup D’etat in America is the most egregious abuse of power and the most prodigious crime in American political history. The co-conspirators are:

    Kevin Clinesmith, Bill Taylor, Eric Ciaramella, Rosenstein, Mueller/Team, Andrew Weissmann,

    James Comey, Christopher Wray, McCabe, Strozk, Page, Laycock, Kadzic, Sally Yates,

    James Baker, Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr, Priestap, Kortan, Campbell, Sir Richard Dearlove,

    Christopher Steele, Simpson, Joseph Mifsud, Alexander Downer, Stefan “The Walrus” Halper,

    Azra Turk, Kerry, Hillary, Huma, Mills, Brennan, Gina Haspel, Clapper, Lerner, Farkas, Power,

    Lynch, Rice, Jarrett, Holder, Brazile, Sessions (patsy), Nadler, Schiff, Pelosi, Obama,

    Joe Biden, James E. Boasberg, Emmet Sullivan, Gen. Milley, George Soros, John McCain,

    Marc Elias, Igor Danchenko, Fiona Hill, Charles H. Dolan, Jake Sullivan, Strobe Talbot,

    Cody Shear, Victoria Nuland, Ray “Red Hat” Epps, Don Berlin, Kathy Ruemmler, Rodney Joffe,

    Paul Vixie, L. Jean Camp, Andrew Whitney, Lisa O. Monaco, Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg,

    Matthew Colangelo, Merrick Garland, Juan Merchan, Timothy Thibault et al.

  7. Believe me, legacy media is also watching this topic very closely, Professor. The lack of reporting however, is not based solely on disinterest – but rather the real possibility of sudden “Arkancide” breaking out, if reported.

  8. Corrupt to the core. The FBI and DOJ under Obama, and then Biden, were nothing more than a Mafia. Under Trump, they were seditious. And we are supposed to feel sorry for cleaning house? They should all be in prison.

  9. This is a reminder of the sordid past that still needs to be resolved. Your statement, “While Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, the Clinton’s raked in hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign sources”, while true does not fully encompass the totality of corruption. Domestic companies seeking support for international trade deals from the State Department run by Hillary Clinton knew that “contributions” to the foundation would be the grease necessary for results.

    Another line of questioning that has been left unstated but, in my opinion, should be pursued is to first observe that two of President Barack Obama’s most senior lieutenants were actively running corrupt influence peddling schemes. Were they unique in the Obama administration? When did President Obama first become aware of the corruption at the highest levels of his administration? Did any of the “profits” by his lieutenants find its way to an Obama account? Or was Obama simply clueless?

    1. Nobody cares. These rehashed stories about the Clintons, and Obamas are nothing new. Trump is throwing a lot of chaff so his most uneducated followers get distracted from the poor performance numbers of his adminstration and the failure to gain any significant “deals” from other coutries. Inflation is still trending up. Jobs numbers are looking bad, The Ukraine war is still going, Gaza is still ongoing. Iran still has Uranium enrichment capabilities, just diminshed for a few months. Car manufacturers are losing billions in profits thanks to the tariffs, etc, etc. etc.

      These distractions are going to get more and more ridiculous and desperate as things continue to detoriate and Trump will continue to lay blame on everything but himself. How much of Alaska’s resources will Trump give awa to Putin in exchange for what? How does that help us? Bringing up the Clintons or the Obamas does nothing but distract and that’s the purpose. There’s no denying President Trump is a master manipulator of the Media, but you can only do it so long. Legacy media has always been slow to recongize these distractions for that they are. Now that they are happening more fequently and becoming more obvious media has learned to ingore them or give them the scant attention they deserve.

      Professor Turley is clearly trying his best to help the administration peddle these distractions like any other conservative media aligned with President Trump’s agenda. A really bad agenda requires a lot of distractions and the longer they go the less attention they get because of how ridiculous and predictable they get.

  10. Thank You, Prof. Turley! ..another fine realtime case of the Claude Rains Law Enforcement Academy in action! The well researched Book ‘Clinton Cash’ by Peter Schweizer lays out the evidence for everything you have illuminated.. in nauseating detail… how to score extraordinary financial goals with timely assists from the Govt insider… unfortunately the losers were the American people…

  11. as long as the republicans are scared of the democrats NOTHING AND I MEAN NOTHING WILL BE DONE about these crimes.

  12. The Clintons and their foundation were heavily involved in Russian deals while Hillary was Sec of State. For example, Bill was paid $500K for a speech in Russia and the foundation helped grease the skids for the Russian takeover of Uranium One. I’ve always wondered whether the Russia hoax was more about covering the tracks of the Clinton Foundation’s alleged pay-to-play corruption then about the election. This is perhaps why the effort to tarnish Trump picked up steam AFTER the election… the Clintons would be vulnerable to a Trump DoJ/FBI and the defense was going to be: “We’re not crooked Russian tools, you are!”

  13. At this Alaska summit, the Russians have a trained KGB intelligence officer who is also a ruthless war criminal.

    We have a guy who bankrupted casinos and thinks rain falling in Canada somehow flows to California.

    What could go wrong?

      1. Putin was crafty in his day, but he’s surrounded himself by morons and gotten old and out of touch.
        …..kinda like Trump actually.

          1. Better than what Biden and his crew of idiots did with Afghanistan. You do remember Afghanistan, right, you spastic freak?

          2. Hey loser Gigi, care to opine as to why Ukraine is even an issue right now? Why did Biden invite Putin to invade? What dirt does Putin have on the Biden Crime Family?

          3. Isn’t it strange that Putin only invades his neighbors when people other than Trump are in the White House? Why is Putin so scared of Trump, but so willing to walk over other presidents? How much dirt does Putin have on the Biden Crime Family?

      2. Is this actually funny to you? Seriously, after ten years does anyone still really believe this crap?

    1. This is what passes for left-wing comedy. And people wonder why Colbert got cancelled for not being funny.

  14. This site is getting to be a pretty quick read because I skip all comment where the name is Anonymous, it just gets to confusing. You should do that too. Want people to read your comments, make up a name.

    1. I have thought the same thing. It becomes confusing when there is a back and forth between multiple anonymouses.

      1. jake and garyesq2k2:
        It appears that this new wave of back-and-forth conversational anonymouses and the space they use (which also disrupted yesterday’s blogs) are intended to turn off JT’s blog followers and cause them to move on to other sites. I also believe that some of them are priorly-named commenters who were criticized to the point that they are now reincarnated “anonymouses.”
        Your comments are always worthwhile, even if critical of mine.

        1. lin

          Actually, we are are a team of extremely well paid trolls.
          George Soros pays us a lot of money to do this.
          As you all know, disrupting this blog is George’s number one priority.

          1. “Actually, we are are a team of extremely well paid trolls.
            George Soros pays us a lot of money to do this.
            As you all know, disrupting this blog is George’s number one priority.”

            Gigi, have you earned your bus fare yet? How many more truck drivers do you need to service before you get that last dollar?

          2. you are selective in your responses. Those of us who are worthy of your responses must be hitting home with the truthfulness of our posts. Therefore, we can wear your comments as badges of honour.
            So thank you. keep them coming. Pre-dinner hors d’oeuvres @ 5:00

            1. “Pre-dinner hors d’oeuvres”

              There’s a group for that: Redundants Anonymous (RA). It, too, uses a 12-step program. None of which steps are repetitive.

        2. To the great Lin, you are once again spot on. They are trying the blog version of the “heckler’s veto” by ruining the comments section as their only lame way of harming this great site.

      2. garyesq2k2

        I understand why you are so confused.
        Unfortunately, members of the MAGA cult are very easily confused.
        After all, if you were not easily confused, you would not be in the cult.

        1. “I understand why you are so confused.
          Unfortunately, members of the MAGA cult are very easily confused.
          After all, if you were not easily confused, you would not be in the cult.”

          Gigi, I’ve been trying to get in touch with your “associate” about hiring you to entertain some visiting Japanese businessmen that are coming to town. All that we ask is that you not glue in your dentures this time. 11PM sharp. Thanks a bunch sweetie.

      3. I once opposed to having a ‘mute’ feature on this blog because it would had violated the spirit of free speech. However, reading the idiotic diatribe from Gigi, I am now in favor of one. 😂 The only problem is for a mute feature to work, one would need to create an account for the comment section for this blog. Well, I have such an account but it rarely works for me. Once I post a comment or reply to one, it will stop working for me. I won’t be able to reply to anyone else or even being able to like their comment. In short, the comment section need a huge revamp. Professor Turley can still use WordPress and continue to blog. But perhaps using a third-party comment system is needed.

        https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=using+a+third-party+comment+section+with+wordpress

        But for goodness sake, don’t ever use Disqus. That option would be cancerous. If you thought one person deriding the comment section with their idiocy was bad, imagine hundreds of them. 🤦‍♂️ I do believe that’s the reason why The Hill’s website got rid of their comment section as they had used Disqus for their commenting needs.

        1. “More thunderstorms keeping you from your “farm” chores today???????”

          Gigi, have you ever considered a side job servicing farm equipment? They’re always in need of lube.

    2. Thanks Jake, this has been a pet peeve of mine for a long time. I even mentioned it above when telling an Anonymous person that his/her comment was good, but most of us skip over Anonymous people.

      1. Rabble:
        That’s why I put my name in front of my posts. I’m on a gov computer, running through at least 1 VPN, a proxy server, and 2 other redirect servers. I can’t actually sign in even if i wanted to.

  15. “…Those funds were used not only for the Clinton Foundation programs but also for travel and support for the Clinton family members. …”
    Yeah-Ahhhh … to fly Bill down to Pedo Island for his massage sessions.

    Why are we waiting for the ‘Statute of Limitations’ to run out on these People[?]
    Or, is the ‘Statute of Limitations’ clock just now starting upon these newly found pieces (revelations) of evidence[?]

    Time to round Them up and let the ‘Due Process of Law’ work the way it should work [.]

  16. Right next door to the Trump impeachment display at the Smithsonian needs to be a circular display involving the above “usuals” and the Clinton Foundation.
    It would be large enough to support several booths in the display. One dedicated to the Clinton Foundation-Russia roles in Uranium One. Then a third display on how the Clinton Foundation “cleaned up” that mess following Haiti’s 2010 earthquake, with $5.4 BILLion of the raised funds going to “non-Haitian organizations” (while just $580 million and $9 million going to the Haitian government and Haitian organizations, respectively. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37826098) (if I did this correctly (?), 589 million divided by 5.4 billion=0.109074074 %) -Then, while we’re at it, maybe another display regarding Whitewater, then next to that, one involving Bleach-gate and Hillary’s emails, then another for Fusion GPS’s research and Perkins Coie law firm funding revelations regarding a presidential “candidate,” -Then another display, -oh wait, did I forget Benghazi?
    At least Trump’s woes are so recent- and the media so attentive- that he need not worry about what may come out ten years later.

    1. “. . . a circular display . . .”

      A new room in the basement. Call it “The Rogues’ Gallery.”

      “(?)” Drop the “%,” and your calculation is spot on.

      1. Yup, thanks Sam. Go to the head of the class.
        That would be 10.9%. (at least I got the dividend/divisor part right.)
        wasn’t Bill a Rhodes scholar? Is he now a Rogues Scholar/Rogue Scholar?
        What Soros-ity was Hillary pledged to in college?

        1. Lin – I would say Hildabeast was a proud member of U Kappa Vinny
          Keg party where the shots are a killer

  17. At least Marcus Junius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus truly believed that they were doing what was good for the Republic. These Machiavellian operatives were in it for power and money. Maintaining a republic when the crowd is controlling the narrative is almost impossible.

    obama was an icon to the masses and those masses controlled the actions of those wanting power and that made obama and his actions impervious to criticism. Laying blame on one or two people is a waste of time since this rot goes all the way to the sub-basement of the swamp and out into the various entities that have been under democrat control for decades.

    If we do not resurrect a civilian society that finds this rot abhorrent it will not stop. The job of those opposed to the democrat/progressive mantra that the ends justify the means is to erase that concept from public discourse and condemns those still cling to it as enemies of the Republic.

    If we can’t re-align our national ethos to something that approaches a respect for honor and truth, we are doomed no matter what this administration discovers. Blogging about this is as useful as a gaggle of old ladies gossiping about the town drunk.

    1. Whimsicalmama writes, “If we do not resurrect a civilian society that finds this rot abhorrent it will not stop.”

      Mama, I suspect we’re living in mouse utopia, and it will not stop. Without the guardrails of harsh reality and natural selection, many people–most people in most societies, in fact–begin losing their minds. Intelligence and education simply become hothouses for corrosive rationalizations.

      49% of the electorate have already succumbed to the mind virus–too close for comfort. All these movies about the zombie apocalypse are just a metaphor for what modern leftism is turning into. I don’t see a cure… just a fight for survival.

      Hope I’m wrong. I’ve been wrong before.

      1. I’m almost certain our founding fathers felt the same way about a rotted and inhumane British empire holding them hostage and squeezing every drop of blood out of the colonies to subsidized their grandiose plans. The difference as that those founding fathers had a “dog in the hunt” with the loss of, not only their freedoms, but their livelihoods under the yoke of the British so they were motivated to rebel.

        I think we will need to come to the point, hopefully not before it is too late, where those with something to lose under a communist system will take up battle against the ever-encroaching “Blob” that is swallowing up the ultra poor and the brain-addled elites with that fake notion of a man-made utopia brought about with just the right government control.

        Only when enough has been taken will strong men and women realize what sacrifices they need make to ensure that this grand notion of self-government continues as a beacon against the endless tried and failed top-down governments that have littered our globes histories. It is a shame that our media/education industries are working so fervently to prevent us from realizing the true facts on the ground.

        1. *. I don’t see how the juvenile girls fit in. Modeling agencies are a way to easily travel from communist countries but does nothing for Islamic nations. M-6 involved? Clinton Foundation is for money Clintons having no principles. The enemy is,
          whim ? Maxwell fought Germany but did that morph into Stalin?

          I just don’t believe the teen model thing.

          Idk

            1. *. Epstein’s juveniles, were models or some were? Did they travel, where, take anything, see anyone? Epstein was a donor to Clinton Foundation. It’s a decoy but how, why.

      2. “Mama, I suspect we’re living in mouse utopia, and it will not stop. Without the guardrails of harsh reality and natural selection, many people–most people in most societies.”

        You’re right (mouse utopia- Calhoun), but we must also look hard at where we are and where we came from. Our vision is shaped by the fact that we live in the greatest large nation in history. America is a rare accident of history: something no one could have reasonably expected. We sit at the top of the political and economic spectrum, and it takes constant energy to stay there. Left alone, all nations drift toward mediocrity.

        When comfort is guaranteed, people stop striving. Without struggle, discipline and unity fall apart. The very abundance that once was a blessing becomes the seed of decline. Staying on top demands strong leadership and a willing, disciplined people. A nation’s survival depends on both what happens and how its people see it. Today we are comfortable and complacent: a dangerous mix when it takes real effort just to hold our ground, let alone climb higher.

      1. “So what.”

        Sounds like what the police detective will be saying when someone reports finding your dead body in the dumpster behind the truck stop, Gigi.

      1. “Your browser is correctly identifying this article as worthless spam”

        Thanks for your pointless critique, Gigi. Do you intend to spend your entire life spamming this blog? Sounds kind of pathetic to me, but you do you.

Leave a Reply to MadmanCancel reply