It has been 157 years since the last ship taking convicts from the United Kingdom landed in Australia. Now, in a crushing historical irony, Australia is contracting with the small Pacific island of Nauru to resettle foreign-born criminals who the courts have ruled cannot be imprisoned indefinitely. The court rulings show how our allies are facing the same dilemma in dealing with people who enter the country illegally and then oppose efforts to deport them for years in litigation.
Starting with the “First Fleet” in 1788, English courts regularly sentenced convicts to “transportation” to Australia, where they were used for labor in the then-British colony. For years, the British left prisoners in rotting warships called “hulks” in the Thames River. Under Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger, the government solved the problem with the use of Australia. Convicts dreaded the common sentencing line issued by British judges: “The sentence of the court upon you is, that you be transported beyond the seas for the term of your natural life.” It became so common that Historian K. S. Inglis noted that “The founders were not a chosen people except in the old Australian joke that they were chosen by the best judges in England.”
The current move is not to use immigrants for labor, but to remove individuals without a technical deportation. The move follows the 2023 decision by Australia’s High Court that non-citizens who have no viable resettlement options outside of Australia must be released.
These deportees are largely individuals who engaged in criminal conduct. However, the court ruled that some countries, such as Afghanistan, are considered unsafe for their nationals to be repatriated, while others, like Iran, simply refuse to accept them back if they are being transported involuntarily.
One such individual was identified as NZYQ in court papers and came from Myanmar through a smuggler and proceeded to rape a child soon after being released into the Australian community. After serving a prison sentence, he was held by authorities until he was ordered to be released again into the population.
The government is reportedly moving to introduce legislation to strip the right of fairness from deportation decisions under the new Nauru deal. It would negate canceled visas that are under appeal in court.
Like Australia, the United States needs to address an immigration process that allows individuals to game the system for years despite orders of removal. The system is simply not working and, with millions allowed into the country under the Biden Administration, Congress needs to streamline the system for expedited removals.
You say that the system is not working. I think that it’s working exactly as designed.
*. Not one of God’s better worlds. Woe woe…
Moll Flanders was transported and she made out pretty well.
Jeanine “BoxWine” Pirro strikes out yet again.
A DC grand jury refused to indict a woman charged with threatening to kill Trump.
In August, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro claimed that Nathalie Jones, 50, threatened the president’s life on Instagram and Facebook and in interviews with the Secret Service.
“I am willing to sacrificially kill this POTUS by disemboweling him and cutting out his trachea with Liz Cheney,” Jones wrote on Facebook, according to prosecutors. She later told the Secret Service that Trump was a “Nazi” and that she would “carry out her mission of killing” him with a “bladed object.”
She has been released from detention.
Looks like Natalie (middle name Karen) found its way to Turley’s blog.
I noticed you failed to say the Judge who let her go…
He’s well known for being a jerk and NOT following the law.
Doesn’t matter who the judge is.
The grand jury found no probable cause to indict.
The judge did not “let her go” as you say.
The grand jury “let her go”.
In the absence of any other charge, then it would be illegal to hold her in custody.
Any judge would be required to release her.
Very simple.
You are correct – so why did 99.99% of J6 defendent spend years much less minutes in jail ?
None of them should have been indicted ?
Why was Jack Smith persuing Trump in DC for his speech at the elipse – which was clearly far less threatening and violent than this ?
What is crystal clear from this is that democrats have no standards except double standards.
While Jones remarks are vile and repugnant and she will likely be a secret service person of interest for life. I agree with the DC Grand Jury – her remarks do NOT constitute a crime.
But idiots like you have constantly gone after republicans – all the way through to Trump for far tamer language. In fact both Biden and Obama prosecuted and convicted people for political rhetoric that is tame compared to that of Jones.
All you have done is firmly establish your own hypocrisy.
“You are correct – so why did 99.99% of J6 defendent spend years much less minutes in jail ?”
Because the overwhelming evidence against the j6 individuals showed plenty of probable cause and the fact that many if not all were on video and filmed themselves committing their crimes.
After getting a hearing and judges or juries looking at the evidence they were found guilty or pleaded guilty.
J6 pardonees were found guilty of their crimes because of clear evidence.
ROFL
Probable cause of what ?
Jones bitterly hates Trump. She hates him enough to say in great detail the crimes that she claims she is willing to commit.
J6 defendants beleive – and with far more evidence than you left wing nuts will ever admit, that the 2020 election was stolen.
If that was a bat4hit crazy claim – which it is not. They would still be fully protected in excercising their right to protest, petition government, assembled and demand that congress refuse to certify the election.
Contra your claims there is ZERO evidence that more than a tiny few did anything beyond that.
There is absolutely a great grand conspiracy fo J6 defendants to come to washington to excercist their first amendment rights – that is NOT a crime.
Most left wing nuts completely misconstrue the SCOTUS decision tossing the 18 USC 1512 convictions as a misreading of the law. SCOTUS was throwing the prosecuors a bone.
SCOTUS had TWO choices – reject the provisions of the law that DOJ was losing as FACIALLY unconstitutional, or reject them as a misreading of the law – SCOTUS picked the latter.
But if the law had actually been writen a clearly as the Biden DOJ claimed – SCOTUS would have no choice but to toss these convictions as unconstitutional.
This is LITTERALLY the same as the Jones case – EXCEPT that Jones is FARTHER from first amendment protection than the J6 defendants.
Jones was NOT protesting, when was not assmbling, she was not petitioning congress – she was threateing in great detail to commit an extremely violent crime.
Had she taken the tiniest step towards actually doing so – she would correctly now be in jail for a very long time – or atleast she would with a grand jury form the 90% of america that give a crap about the rule of law.
Jones speech – like the speech and actions of J6 defendants would protected by the first amendment. But only because she took no actions outside of first emendment protection to move her threats of criminal violence to actual actions.
“Because the overwhelming evidence against the j6 individuals showed plenty of probable cause and the fact that many if not all were on video and filmed themselves committing their crimes.”
ROFL – the standard for a criminal conviction is proof beyond a reasonable doubt – not probable cause. Regardless there is plenty of probable cause in the Jones case.
And NO there is no evidence that the J6 defendants did or sought to do anything criminal.
Had the CP not teargassed themselves and then lobbed tear gass into the crowd which triggered the violence.
Har the J6 protestors SUCCEEDED in what they intended and marched through the capital demanding that congress not certify the 2020 election – had congress done as they demanded – there STILL WOULD BE NO CRIME.
The problem with you left wing nuts and the Biden DOJ and the stupid judges and juries in these cases is that had these people gotten exactly what they wanted – there would still be no crime.
There is no crime of not accepting an election result.
It is not an insurection to use protest, assembly speach and petitioning government to demand that congress act (or not act). It is not insurrection to Succeed.
There were absolutely no firearms brought by any J6 defendants to the capital grounds.
The only shots fired were by the idiot officer Byrd who murdered a protestor.
There are over 500M firearms in the US – but not one was used by J6 protestors.
Nor did a single J6 protestor do the things left wing nut violent protestors do all the time.
Not one brought a laser to blind police.
Not one brought tacticle gear.
Likely 1/3 to 1/2 owned firearms – none brought them to the capital grounds.
No one brought a frozen water bottle to hurl at law enforcement.
Despite deceptive photos by the media that appear to show the capital buring on the evening of J6 – there was absolutely Zero arson.
no one brought rocks or bricks.
The “looting” claims rest on idiocy like some guy moved Pelosi’s podium more than 100ft.
Not some guy actually took pelosi’s podium out of the capital and tried to sell it on ebay.
All the halmarks of orgainized violence that are present in pretty much EVERY “peaceful” left wing protest, were missing at J6.
Your right – the video is absolutely damning – of YOU – which is why it was not made public or given to defendants – a brady violation – but since when have left wing nuts cared about the rule of law or the constitution.
Jones is properly getting the protection of her constitutional rights – despite clearly being a despicable person. But being a vile person and saying evil things is NOT a crime.
Wishing for or threatening to do illegal acts – is ALSO not a crime.
Depite your idiotic claims the reality of J6 is that left wing nuts were TERRIFIED but J6.
They are absolutely terriffied that middle america will rise in protest.
The protests of the left have been impotent for ALL of US history.
The Vietnam war did not end because the SDS staged protests.
It ended because the silent majority watching the evening news wanted to know why the F#$K we were sending their suns and daughters to die in foreign jungles where no US interest was at stake.
But when the people who were protesting at J6 come out to protest – the WORLD changes. The American revolution occurred because of people EXACTLY like those who showed up at J6.
We are now 4+ years later – even in Jan 2021 – a majority of people polled that the 2020 election was highly suspicious. They did not share exactly the same reasons for doubting the outcome, regardless a majority did.
If anything today it is worse.
We KNOW that the deep state used unconstitutional censorship to alter the outcome.
Are you really so stupid as to not understand that we can not have government itself attempting to influence the outcome of an election.
Russia, China, Iran – can attempt to influence the outcome of a US election – there is nothing we can do about that and nothing we should. Foreign countries may not have constitutional rights in the US, But they have the right to free speech and there is nothing we can do to change that.
But the US govenrment can NOT attempt to influence US elections – which is exactly what it did in 2016 and 2020, and 2024. Those efforts failed in 2016 and 2024 – but they were unconstitutional and immoral regardless.
I personally find it hard to get worked up over the recent revalations regarding the perfidity of deep state actors and even President Obama, and the often illegal and always unconstitutional conduct they engaged it.
I can not get worked up – because the EVIDENCE was already sufficient 8 years ago. But today there is MORE, much more.
We are also seeing more and more revalations about the 2020 election. Increasingly people do NOT want a repeat of that nonsense. That gets all the worse as more and more is exposed. It seems like everyweek there is a new story about election fraud – most the consequence of mailin voting. Most but not all this fraud is by democrats. Regardless, it is increasingly clear to near everyone that J6 protestors were absolutely right in not trusting the results of the 2020 election.
I recall in November 2020, Turley posted that while it was almost impossible for Trump to prevail in an election challenge. That while election challenges always find errors the norm is that those errors tend to balance out. That itself is compelling evidence that there is no fraud. When the errors found all apear to go one way – it is unlikely they are error. They are fraud.
Regardless, Turley said that Trump would not win election challenges, but that Biden should JOIN and call for REAL inquiry – that the country needed to know with certainty that the election was fair and free of fraud.
Instead the left doubled down on this ludicrous nonsense that somehow 2020 was “perfect” which was inarguably bunkum – no election is perfect. You can beleive that the outcome in 2020 with reasonable accuracy refelcted the vote – but if you beleive it was not rife with problems – you are a complete idiot. None of the few audits conducted should CLEAR evidence of fraud. But ALL showed significant error on a scale that is not acceptable in US elections. And ALL showed that the potential for fraud existed.
The AZ audit – the largest showed that atleast 55,000 clearly fraudulent ballots were cast.
But in the screwed up hybrid unconstitutional election we conducted knowing the scale of fraud does NOT establish who the beneficiary fo the fraud was or that it effected the outcome.
Once a ballot has been counted in an election that tries to meet the requirements of a secret ballot election – you can prove fraud beyond any doubt. You still can not prove who benefited.
I would note 55,000 fraudulent ballots in AZ is the LOW result of the AZ audit – potentially almost half of all ballots cast could have been fraudulent.
That does not prove they were – but half of all ballots cast violated AZ election laws.
If we do not enforce laws – we should not have them. Ballots that do not meet the requirements of the law should not be counted, or we should not have the laws that they violate.
But again as is typical of the left – if they do not like a law – they just ignore it.
That is actual tyranny.
John Say, “And NO there is no evidence that the J6 defendants did or sought to do anything criminal.”
Your long running diatribe shows nothing to support your contention the J6 protesters that were charged did not commit crimes. Many were charged with tresspassing, destruction of government property, theft, assault with a deadly weapon, etc. These crimes were on film and witnessed by law enforcement.
Exercising your right to free speech does not include engaging in violence and destruction of government property and assaulting law enforcement.
Jan 6 protesters were caught committing crimes and violating the law, and yes plenty of evidence was used against them leading to guilty pleas and harsh sentences, particularly to those who assaulted law enforcement.
People from Jan 6 came out to protest and then they went further into criminal actions when they decided to attack law enforcement and force their way into the capitol by destroying property and threatening congressmen with violence. That is no longer free speech.
“We KNOW that the deep state used unconstitutional censorship to alter the outcome.”
The “deep state” is nothing but a fantasy borne out of the fevered minds of conspiracy theory nuts unsatisfied with the lack of evidence to prove their theories. Any lack of evidence is seen as evidence that there is something going on. It’s a vicious cycle of distrust and paranoia that doesn’t stop until their conspiracy theories are “proven” true.
The 2020 election fraud claims have been debunked over and over for years now and the only reason people still cling to the failed claims of voter fraud is because it’s the only excuse they have to justify their irrationality.
Your long winding response shows that there is still anger and resentment at not being able to prove it was all true.
Because the judges in many instances would not allow exculpatory evidence to be seen, heard, or shown to the juries.
There was actual video and audio evidence that proved the exact opposite of what the corrupt prosecutors were charging and saying to the juries. The DC judges are as brainwashed by the fake narrative and Democrat lies as the poisoned jury pools. Let’s hope Trump does away with the DC courts. Get rid of them.
“As conditions of the release, 50-year-old Nathalie Rose Jones was ordered to have a GPS monitor fitted and meet with her New York City psychiatrist no later than 5 pm on August 27” DID NOT JUST LET HER GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“As conditions of the release, 50-year-old Nathalie Rose Jones was ordered to have a GPS monitor fitted and meet with her New York City psychiatrist no later than 5 pm on August 27” DID NOT JUST LET HER GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Once again, illiberal leftists prove to us they would rather have a obviously mental health case out on the streets then in a institution where she could get the mental health attention she obviously needs.
Thank you for proving, yet again, how you lack common sense.
Republicans consistently refuse to fund mental health initiatives or programs. When there are mass shootings at schools the first things offered by Republicans in Congress are thougths and prayers and calls for more mental health screenings without mentioning any funding or programs. Mental health programs are usually the first to suffer when Republicans propose budget cuts.
All that you are demonstrating is that the people of DC are nuts and will not indict people for crimes against republicans.
You had no problems with sentencing J6 protesters who did nothing wrong with multi year sentences.
There is no evidence that Jacob Channing – the so called Q anon shaman, threatened anyone, that he acted violent, that he damaged anything, and yet he spent years in the DC Gulags.
With respect to Jones – there are specific laws regarding threatening the president that have been upheld by the courts – and Jones in arguably violated those.
But the supreme court has over a decade ago ruled that for a threat to be a crime it must be specific, it must be immediate, it must be plausible, and it must be credible.
The evidence against Jones is damning – but NOT quite criminally damning.
This is also a place I part company with Prof. Turley.
The US has a LONG history of violent political rhetoric. Anyone who bothers to become familiar with it can fine lots of egregious threats of violence targeting our founders or issued by our founders.
I absolutely beleive people – especially politicians, should be judged by others for their rhetoric.
I do not think we should elect politicians whose political speech constantly is violent.
But that is something each voter must judge for themselves.
We should not involve our criminal justice system in the process.
“All that you are demonstrating is that the people of DC are nuts and will not indict people for crimes against republicans.”
That is not true. The DC grand juries refused to indict because the DOJ in its zeal to punish any offense as a felony chose to overcharge regardless of what the law says should be the charge. It means the DC grand juries recognized the overreach and acted accordingly. Throwing a sandwich at a fully armed federal officer who was never in danger of serious harm or injury would never fly as a felony according to the law. J6 protesters beating up and injuring police officers and caught on video is certainly a felony.
The Trump DOJ has already declared any offense against law enforcement will be prosecuted in the harshest possible way. Jack smith did that and he used clear evidence and the law.
No felony? then prosecute the sub chucker with a misdemeanor and put him the DC gulag awaiting trial.
like they did to so many J6ers.
He was charged with a misdemeanor and received one week in jail. That’s what the law required. But Trump supporters wanted more they wanted a harsher punishment because they perceived him as a liberal democrat. They wanted the most vindictive punishment possible. Not what the law required.
How about we do what humans have done since the dawn of time? Declare the illegals as invaders and ship them off to any place beyond the borders.
But what borders? State, county, city, town?
The galaxy’s borders.
It’s not a bad idea. We will soon start hearing the same sentiment coming from Europe, now that local Islam leaders are threatening an entire take over of the EU with death to those not converting. However, they should consider a precursor, by “transporting” the liberal judges first.
Well said professor, especially the last paragraph. Biden and Democrats claimed they needed their bogus immigration reform bill passed to do something about the border crisis that they created. It failed, rightfully so. Trump won the election and in less than 100 days, he ended the crisis just by using existing laws, and LEOs in the capacity they were intended to serve.
What’s the big announcement at 2:00pm ???
He’ll probably announce that he died and has risen.
Second term, second coming of Trump.
Concepts of a health care plan!
Infrastructure week is coming!
He’s going to replace JD Vance, with Vladimir Putin.
Free covfefe and hamberders!
New Superman NFT cards!
Only $599.
End of season sale in the Oval Office Grift Shop?
1500% off everything.
Oh look, a graduate of the Washington DC school system.
Trump had a stroke. Looks like he’s already walking funny.
Biden did not Prez Trump you fool
The visible bruise on Mr Trump’s right hand may be a side effect of blood thinners.
Big announcement at 2:00 PM? Hmmm….
Trump’s children slam ‘slick’ health rumors as president returns to golf course
“The White House said in July that the president had been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency, a vein condition that causes swelling to the lower legs.
Moreover, White House physician Dr. Sean Barbabella said Trump’s condition was a ‘benign and common’ in a July memo.
He explained that bruising on Trump’s hand was ‘consistent with minor soft tissue irritation from frequent handshaking’ along with the president’s use of aspirin as treatment.”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15055151/Eric-Trump-furiously-blasts-twisted-health-conspiracies-Trump-golfs-light-weekend-schedule.html
Bloomberg White House correspondent Josh Wingrove posted Trump will address reporters in the White House press pool regarding changes to the Department of Defense.
Anony moron, how does it feel to be so poorly informed but a moron too?
Aspirin is a known blood thinner. Coupled with anti-cholestetol meds (statins), this could make Trump susceptible to bruising.
One can suffer from venous insufficiency and high cholesterol simultaneously, thus the need.for blood-thinners, without which Trump would be at risk for blood clot(s) resulting in stroke. I have seen bruising resulting from thinners.
I don’t know which Anon you were calling a moron, but you seem uninformed yourself, Upstate.
“Poorly informed”? I have a job and have better things to do than stay glued to the media all day, “Moron”? Who, me? Look in a mirror to view a moron and a hayseed.
Filed under “duh”…’The system is simply not working…’
Perhaps the attorney and judge in every criminal illegal alien case should be held personally, if not at least financially, accountable for the repeat offending actions of the criminals they release. Start with the threat of government pension loss. I guarantee you’ll see the biggest turn-around in their sentencing decisions.
Congress will never address this crushing issue. Never. They are too polarized. Being re-elected is far more important than doing what is best for the country. Needless to say, with the guano-crazy loons, aka The Squad, in Congress, any effort to right the immigration ship will go down in flames.
I can think of boat loads of passengers on such journeys to islands off of the coast of Alaska. We should start a list and have the project completed before July 4 2026.
You as tour director or inmate?
“The founders were not a chosen people except in the old Australian joke that they were chosen by the best judges in England.” – Australian Collective Experience Humor
If US citizens chose to sell their children into slave labor because they were convinced (probably deceptively) that a few years in “indentured” service would not only benefit the children, but assure their migration into a better life, a judge may have different opinion than the one we saw this weekend to prevent their return.
“I have the government attempting to remove minor children from the country in the wee hours of the morning on a holiday weekend,” — U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan
In simple words, that opinion states migration of children into unintended sexual and labor trafficking by their parents is not only legal, but should be encouraged and we will do so and never return those children.
Enough of picking on the Australians – maybe we should look within our own house?
We here are facing an illegal immigration dilemma of our own, brought to us by a corrupt administration sustained by a Goebbels like propaganda. Each and every activist US judge who is continuing the “resistance” against the citizens of the United States should be removed to Nauru.
What exactly is Goebbels like propaganda? Asking for a friend.
@Anon – “Friend”? Hard to imagine you have any? You’ve outdone yourself once again with that reply. You really expect us to believe you have a “friend”, hilarious.
Nauru ~ 21.0 sq km | sq mi 8.1
Nauru’s sea level is rising significantly, about 2 to 3 times faster than the global average, with a rate of 4.4 mm/yr around 2010. This rapid rise, primarily due to global warming and ice melt, threatens to inundate the low-lying island, contaminate freshwater, and displace its population. Projections show continuous sea level rise for centuries, with the extent depending on future emissions, potentially causing frequent flooding and requiring large-scale population relocation.
GEOGRAPHY
Nauru is a small oval-shaped island in the western Pacific Ocean, located just 42 kilometers (26 mi.) south of the Equator. It is one of three great phosphate rock islands in the Pacific Ocean–the others are Banaba (Ocean Island) in Kiribati and Makatea in French Polynesia–though its phosphate reserves have been presumed to be nearly depleted. Phosphate mining in the central plateau has left a barren terrain of jagged coral pinnacles, up to 15 meters (49 ft.) high. A century of mining has stripped and devastated four-fifths of the total land area.
The island is surrounded by a coral reef, exposed at low tide and dotted with pinnacles. The reef is bounded seaward by deep water, inside by a narrow sandy beach. A 150-300-meter (492-984 ft.) wide fertile coastal strip lies landward from the coast, ending in forested coral cliffs that rise to the now mined-out central plateau. The highest point of the plateau is 65 meters (213 ft.) above sea level. The island’s only fertile areas are within the narrow coastal belt, where there are coconut palms, pandanus trees, and indigenous hardwoods, and the land surrounding the inland Buada lagoon on the central plateau, where bananas, pineapples, and some vegetables are grown. Some secondary vegetation has begun to cover the scarred central plateau and its coral pinnacles.
https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/nauru/74212.htm
Sounds a lot like the South American penal colony on Devil’s Island – See: Papillon
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070511/
You SF.
So what. I would quite cheerfully drown a man who rapes a child. Why would anyone in their right mind want that living in their community?
But only if convicted. The rapist has rights ya know.
For some of the best ruminations on immigration policy currently being written, El Gato Malo at boriquagato.substack.com is a must read. He has provided profound analysis over the past several weeks and all should give consideration to his warnings.
The British did in fact send their prisoners to the 13 colonies and when the Revolutionary War was over, that ended and the prisoners were stacking up in the English prisons. Parliament decided that it would be more humane to send them to Australia and put them to work. The younger ones especially were merely street waifs and if in prison with hardened criminals, would become more hardened.
Some of the prisoners, if they showed good faith, were released and given some land and opportunity to make a life. They had to work very hard to make it work. It is estimated that twenty percent of Australians descend from the prisoners.
I don’t blame them. I hope it works out.
Australia is a difficult place to immigrate. During COVID it took nearly two months and much documentation to obtain an emergency visa to visit family who live there.
Where was this ‘outrage’ when we tried to do the same thing? We paid El Salvador to take illegal immigrant criminals and keep them jailed. I didn’t see this on Professor Turley’s article.
“ Like Australia, the United States needs to address an immigration process that allows individuals to game the system for years despite orders of removal. ”
The reason the system can be gamed is because it is broken and antiquated. President Biden and some Democrats tried to address this when they proposed immigration system reforms and Republicans were on board with the idea, until President Trump who feared Biden getting any credit decided to attack the policy and scuttle it by threatening Republicans with primaring them.
Bidens fix was to let in MORE illegals! He tried to take credit for reform (a bad one) AFTER letting in millions. Bidens proposed reform was TERRIBLE!!! Don’t blame GOP and Trump for rejecting a bad reform proposal!!!
Republicans were on board Bidens proposed immigration reforms. In fact they included a lot of Repulican ideas and demands. President Trump didn’t like is the idea of Biden getting any credit for a successul reform of the immigration system. Republicans scuttled their own ideas out of fear of givng Biden a win.
Only a few Republicans were on board for the reforms. The reforms still let in MILLIONS. It was a scam by Biden! It would have lead to amnesty for millions! DEMS rejected a proposal GOP had a year before. Schumer did not let it get to a vote! Get your “FACTS” right X!!!!
Nope
Not sure what mental illness it takes to defend criminals who rape children or other criminal behavior while destroying the home and lives of the property they break into. Would you want law enforcement to remove people who broke into your home, insisted you pay to support them while they rape and brutalize and feed drugs to your family members?
Instead of people who who show up legally, sign a lease, get a job, eventually move out leaving your property in the same shape or better than they got it, then become good neighbors you want the above.
Talk about lacking mental clarity.
If they’ve even list Australia, the Age of Suicidal Virtue-Signaling is drawing to a close.
The last paragraph says it all. Many other countries as evidenced by protests yesterday are finally waking up! If you hate everything about our country then we should help them leave.
I could Give-a-S_ _ _ , whether Robert Muller, John Brennen, James Clapper, James Comey, THE CLINTONS and all the Others have Parkinson, Cancer, or They’re lying on their Death Bed.
They can all be ‘CHARGED’ with a CRIME: Conspiracy to overthrow the Government.
When you conspire to topple a Presidential Candidate (and attempt to assassinate him), a Former President and now sitting President to install your own Leader and Leadership by proxy of the Autopen, You have committed the Crime of Conspiracy to overthrow the Government.
They must be Charged!
Do unto Them as They have done unto Others. Subpoena their Secret Service Personnel Detail(s), their Associates, their Spouse, their Side-Kicks. These Individuals were and are not what They appear to be, They acted as Traitors to Our Government.
God Speed Chairman James Comer, put an end to the endless Non-Stop Sideshows.
THE LIST
Adam Schiff | Alexander Downer | Alexander Vindman | Alvin Bragg
Andrew McCabe | Andrew Weissmann | Andrew Whitney | Azra Turk
Barack Obama | Bill Clinton | Bill Priestap | Bill Taylor
Bruce Ohr | Charles H. Dolan | Christopher Steele | Christopher Wray
Cody Shear | Dana Remus | Daniel Goldman | Don Berlin
Donna Brazile | E.W. Priestap | Eric Holder | Emmet Sullivan
Eric Ciaramella | Eugene Vindman | Evelyn Farkas | Fani Willis
Fiona Hill | Gen. Mark Milley | George Soros | Gina Haspel
Glenn Simpson | Gov. Janet Mills | Hillary Clinton | Huma Abedin
Hunter Biden | Igor Danchenko | Jake Sullivan | James Baker
James Clapper | James Comey | James E. Boasberg | Jeff Sessions
Jerry Nadler | Joe Biden | John Bolton | John Brennan
John Kerry | John McCabe | John Podesta | Joseph Mifsud
Juan Merchan et.al. | Judge Arthur Engoron | Kathy Ruemmler | Kevin Clinesmith
Kurt Campbell | L. Jean Camp | Letitia James | Lisa O. Monaco
Lisa Page | Lois Lerner | Loretta Lynch | Marc Elias
Matthew Colangelo | Merrick Garland | Michael Cohen | Michael Kortan
Michael Sussmann | Mike Pompeo | Nancy Pelosi | Nellie Ohr
Paul Vixie | Perkins Coie et.al. | Peter Fritsch | Peter J. Kadzic
Peter Strzok | Richard Dearlove | Richard Schiff | Robby Mook
Robert Muller | Rod Rosenstein | Rodney Joffe | Ron Klain
Sally Yates | Samantha Power | Sir Richard Dearlove | Stefan Halper
Stephen Laycock | Stormy Daniels | Strobe Talbot | Susan E. Rice
The Mueller-Team | Timothy Thibault | Tom Rice | Valerie Jarrett
Victoria Nuland | ABC | BBC | CBS
CNN | FOX | MSNBC | NBC
NPR | PBS | New York Times | Washington Post
… | … | … | …
Robert Mueller’s battle with debilitating disease forces Republicans to drop request for blockbuster Jeffrey Epstein testimony
By: Jon Michael Raasch, US Political Reporter ~ September 1st., 2025
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15055071/robert-mueller-debilitating-disease-parkinsons.html
The Cover Up Continues: OK Muller’s out – Subpoena William (Bill) Barr and put him on the stand.
Let’s get down to it. There’s more than one person in D.C. that knows it all. As a Citizen I’m tired of being taken for a ride. This was Bull S_ _ _ and this Cover Up is the same B.S. that got Trump elected in the first place. While you People (politicians) are playing these Games, the Chinese, Indians, and Russians are pulling way-out ahead of Us.
“It’s the: Endless Lies, Endless Cheating, Endless Theft of the American People -Stupid-”
Spit it out! -The Truth-
I second that!
I agree, enough of this special treatment for criminality in the name of politics. It only takes good people to remain silent to lose our Nation.
Makes no no sense what you wrote.
Sir, you have a derangement syndrome. I just spit out the truth.
Those of us who were doxed through the embedded DOJ state, then attacked OUTSIDE ANY PROTEST OR EVEN PUBLIC MEETINGS understand what the last 16 years of the “Justice System” really means. The only problem with this list is sequence – those who were active Oligarch/Autocrats (while accusing others of being such and deceit they were the actual perpetrators) should be at the front of the list, and Merrick Garland whose actions, vitriol and questionably even treason to the Constitutional Judicial system, historically apparently glorifies Reinhard Heydrich[NSDAP] into sainthood.
Agree completely. Charge them all. If Mueller says he can’t show up, charge him with contempt, prosecute him and send him off to prison. No one is above the law, right? But watch Rep. James Comer cave instead of playing aggressive hard ball. James Comer is a pathetic weak excuse for the actual courage the job requires. Go for it Jimmy. Go for it you pathetic coward.