Mayor Brandon Johnson has long been as popular as Ebola in Chicago, a politician who has continued to spend wildly while virtually chasing businesses from the city. Johnson was brought to power with the support of the Chicago Teacher’s Union (CTU) and proceeded to approve bloated contracts and pensions demanded by the CTU. Now, both Johnson and CTU have lost a fight to secure a $200 million loan to avoid the need to reduce the budget or staff. A bill has come due, and Johnson is claiming that the criticism by some of his closest allies is due to racism.
Johnson fired the head of the school board and packed the board with his allies in order to secure the loan. However, in the end, his allies could not sign off on what would be a disastrous short-term, high-rate loan to plug the hole in the budget.
Chicago politicians have repeatedly yielded to the CTU on massive pension deals to secure the union’s support and contributions in elections. The pensions have triggered financial crises for years. Johnson’s solution was familiar: just borrow more money at ruinous rates to kick the can down the road. In the meantime, the public schools (despite a $10.2 billion budget) continue to fail students, particularly minority and poor students, in a system producing dismal performance and proficiency levels.
The $10.2 billion budget, approved by 12 of 20 board members, closes a $734 million deficit but does not include a loan, which the mayor’s office sought to cover the pension payment and other unexpected shortfalls.
After the pandemic, money from the Biden Administration ran out, and Johnson actually had to balance the books. That would have involved confronting the CPS staff and the powerful union. Instead, Johnson wanted to sign off on another loan. When the former head of the board floated cutting back on the budget and staff, Johnson and the CTU forced him out.
Even the CPS staff was raising alarms over Johnson’s new math approach to loans. They noted that this loan would be signed without any promise of future revenue. In other words, it would just push the CPS and city closer to insolvency through “crisis borrowing.” The result would be a cascading failure, with expected credit downgrades, despite the fact that CPS bonds are already rated at junk status due to past overborrowing to plug budget gaps.
Johnson, however, thinks that money magically appears with loans and that he can simply continue to borrow his way out of any budget shortfall.
It was too much even for the city council, which has approved overspending for years.
Johnson responded in signature fashion and accused his own allies, many of whom are minorities, of effective racism: “When you put a Black man in charge of a city, all of a sudden everybody wants to be an accountant.”
Of course, one does not have to be an accountant to see that borrowing almost a quarter of a billion dollars for a system near bankruptcy is irrational, especially when it involves a high-rate loan with no revenue stream to support the added burden. It is like a citizen spending wildly on a credit card without any means to pay the principal, let alone the interest. The difference is that Johnson is risking insolvency for an entire city, suppressing creditworthiness and increasing the costs of future loans.
CPS itself teaches personal finance subjects to students, though it is so heavily laden with jargon that it is hard to tell it from a social studies class. The course description on “educating for equity” seems geared more to balancing societal shortcomings than personal budgets:
“Financial Education begins with students’ identities and memberships in our communities, extends into disciplinary inquiry-based, culturally sustaining instruction that educates for broad economic inclusion, mobility, critical examination of existing systems, and financially secure individuals and communities.”
In the meantime, Chicago is now facing a $1.15 billion shortfall and Johnson is calling for increasing taxes on the wealthy and businesses despite the fact that Chicago is losing both businesses and residents. The incoming citizens are largely immigrants, including undocumented immigrants, in the sanctuary city. That has driven expenditures even higher for the city while it loses businesses and residents needed for its tax base.
As a Chicagoan, I have no illusions about the city politics. There has never been reasonable fiscal policies in the city in my lifetime. However, Johnson has moved from the dismissive to delusional in ignoring the economic realities growing in the city.
Go Brandon!
Lets put this in perspective…
In the past under King Daley II , the city sold off its parking meters to a company for 1 billion dollars. The money was promised to be used for investments and not to be spent… Bad deal, and of course within a month of the deal closing… King Daley II used it to close a 1 billion dollar gap in the city’s budget.
So what Brandon has tried to do is more of the same.
Now the important thing is that the company modernized the meters and then raised parking rates around the city.
So that within less than 10yrs, even after their expenses… they recouped their investment. Had Daley done what they did… the city would have millions to spare.
Daley did this because his plan was to reduce the autos within the city. To also bring in congestion pricing and zones. Just like he saw in London.
This too failed.
And this happens when you live in a one party town.
And Turley… don’t forget… you as a liberal democrat are part of this problem.
-Gumby
What is it with liberals. Regardless of educational credentials, they all appear to be financially illiterate…whether it be Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson or Fed Governor Lisa Cook.
DeMS-13 Democrats are out of control.
https://torrancestephensphd.substack.com/p/rise-of-the-mashed-potato-brained
It’s their money, spend it when you want!
Government is the J.C. Wentworth of the modern economy.
—————————————
–Oddball
“Take it easy Big Joe, some of these people got sensitive feelings.”
What you talkin about Willis…
Red States are laughing ….
Blaming the voters, you get what you voted for, is a fair assessment of corrupt city government. But then it’s no secret that elections aren’t always fair because of voter fraud and outright cheating. If non-citizens, dead people and people no longer legitimately on the roles can vote then non-resident property owners who pay property and income taxes to the city should have a vote in how the city is run and by whom. Second home and investment property owners who are US citizens should get to vote. Now they live with the disasters like Chicago and New York and their only recourse is to sell and further do damage to the city and those who can’t leave.
*. Chicago deserves safety for its citizens. Required as DOMESTIC TRANQUILITY.
NOPE.. The people of Chicago voted for this mess. Let them enjoy it.
great
It doesn’t exist.
It is just another leftist hoax