“We got the guillotine, you better run.”
Those words could have easily been expressed at the turn of the nineteenth century as French Jacobins and other groups called for the heads of the wealthy and privileged classes.
Indeed, for some of us, it was a bizarre sense of déjà vu. As the scene unfolded with this chant and a full-sized guillotine in Portland, I was putting final touches on my forthcoming book, Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution. The book, published by Simon & Schuster, will be released in 2026 as part of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. It explores the American and French Revolutions and why one became the most stable democracy in the world and the other became the blood-soaked “Terror.”
The appearance of guillotines is becoming commonplace in protests by the left. From protests against Trump to those against Israel, the symbol of the Terror is being rolled out as a warning to those with opposing views: “We got the guillotine, you better run.”
It is the ultimate expression of an age of rage. There is no question that it is protected speech. However, it is part of what I have called “rage rhetoric,” and it is meant to inflame others. It suggests that the only solution to these issues is what the French called “the razor of the Republic.”
In the French Revolution, the irony is that those who turned the guillotine into the symbol of revolution were themselves beheaded on the same platforms. Robespierre and others would ultimately be dispatched in the same atmosphere of rage and revelry.
As my new book discusses, most revolutions are driven by establishment figures who seek to capitalize on the wave of popular rage to gain power. We are seeing that today with many Democratic leaders using rage rhetoric to appeal to the far extremes of their political bases.
Former Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger called on people to get ready to “take to the streets” because the political system is failing them. (This is the same Adam Kinzinger who previously denounced Trump and others for reckless rhetoric: “Look, violent rhetoric is wrong, and has no place. But MAGA pretending they didn’t light this fire is gaslighting to the 100th power.”).
California Governor Gavin Newsom declared, “I’m going to punch these sons of bitches in the mouth.” It follows other violent rhetoric from Democratic leaders.
One House member explained that there is a “sense of fear and despair and anger” among voters that “puts us in a different position where … we can’t keep following norms of decorum.” One House Democrat told Axios, “Some of them have suggested … what we really need to do is be willing to get shot.” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D., N.Y.) posted a picture brandishing a baseball bat.
Yet another admitted that constituents have told them to prepare for “violence … to fight to protect our democracy.” Others reported that liberals are talking about the need “to storm the White House and stuff like that.”
One explained that “They’re angry beyond things.” Another said, “It’s like … the Roman coliseum. People just want more and more of this spectacle.”
Some are discussing triggering or staging violence. One member said, “What I have seen is a demand that we get ourselves arrested intentionally or allow ourselves to be victims of violence, and … a lot of times that’s coming from economically very secure white people.”
In one encounter, a lawmaker told Axios: “I actually said in a meeting, ‘When they light a fire, my thought is to grab an extinguisher’. And someone at the table said, ‘Have you tried gasoline?’”
Some have. Protesters are burning cars, dealerships, and even lawyers and reporters on the left are throwing Molotov cocktails at police. We have also seen a massive increase in attacks on ICE officers, who are now covering their faces to avoid doxxing or retaliation against themselves or their families.
In the end, today’s pseudo-revolutionaries are likely to find themselves tomorrow’s reactionaries. Leading mobs is rarely a safe place to be as more radical elements take hold of a movement. The result is an inexorable pattern that runs throughout history as revolution devours its own.
In the end, today’s pseudo-revolutionaries are likely to find themselves tomorrow’s reactionaries. Leading mobs is rarely a safe place to be as more radical elements take hold of a movement.
Hillary Clinton is a pseudo-revolutionary and a real-time reactionary. Her husband was president of the USA, and she was a member of the US Senate. Her husband did no favors for the gay/lesbian population with his infamous and since repudiated, “don’t ask, don’t tell” US policy on military service for homosexuals, and Hillary never introduced nor co-sponsored any legislation supporting gay marriage. Thus her recent reactionary statement about SCOTUS overturning gay marriage is as sincere as Bill Clinton stating under oath, I did not have sex with that woman, unless of course “that woman” was Hillary Clinton. Webster Hubbell maybe?
Hillary Clinton predicts SCOTUS will eventually overturn same-sex marriage
axios.com/2025/08/20/hillary-clinton-supreme-court-same-sex-marriage
Justice Amy Comey Barret was asked by CBS correspondent Norah O’Donnell about Hillary’s prediction. Justice Barrett responded, “I think people who criticize the court who are outside say a lot of different things, but again the point that I make in the book is that we have to tune those things out.”
https://www.foxnews.com/media/amy-coney-barrett-defends-supreme-courts-dobbs-decision-when-pressed-cbs
Hillary may be too old to lob a Molotov Cocktail, but inciting others to violence and attacking SCOTUS are still within the moral cripple’s reach.
Justice Barrett’s new book, Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution, should be a great read. It goes on sale Tuesday, 9 September
The AI oligarchs need thier necks in those guillotines.fast.
No kidding. Repeat repeat same old cockamami stories. Oops now it’s the moslems, the guys, Latin America to annoy. ALWAYS kill the Hews.
Try this: get a job , save your money, do a good job, stay sober, don’t have children if there’s no inheritance except pain and suffering. It’s hard to feed children if you’re starving. Be honest, truthful and industrious.
That would be novel for this world.
I thought that those with an interest in the legal profession
would be interested in the pursuit of truth and justice. I am
disappointed by this pit of vipers.
Define the pursuit of truth and justice in dealing with people who prefer the dystopian horrors of the French Revolution to the genius of the American Revolution.
The genius of the American Revolution, Constitution, and Bill of Rights, 1789.
Trump never should have been elected President in the first place. The Capitol riot disqualified him.
He should have been in prison when he was running for president.
Rebellion or Sedition: “Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”
Seditious conspiracy: “If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.”
Cry harder Gigi, we can’t hear you.
Get over yourself.
Except it didn’t, comrade.
Your one-man, one-vote “democracy” is pure “dictatorship of the proletariat” (i.e. hired help), unconstitutional communism, and distinctly not the restricted-vote republic form of democracy of the American Founders and Framers.
Try riot, Mr. Marx!
Even if every one of your lies were true, the presidency is NOT an “office under the United States”. Therefore neither of your quotes, nor even the 14th amendment, would be able to keep anyone from being elected president. The qualifications for the presidency are in the constitution, and no one has any right to add to them.
I’m an American. My ancestors first arrived here in 1607. I want my country invaded by people who were denied citizenship and various and sundry other illegal aliens past and present. I want to give all my money and private property to parasitic foreign invaders as welfare. Those are my deepest longings and greatest desires as an unhyphenated and patriotic, actual American.
So, apparently your ancestors were immigrants.
They arrived just a tiny bit earlier than most of the other immigrants.
My ancestors arrived about 23,000 years ago, when they walked across the Bering Strait land bridge from Asia during the last ice age.
They were the first humans to set foot in North America, and the only native people of this land.
Everyone else, including you, is descended from immigrants who invaded my ancestors’ lands.
Your ancestors were unwanted foreign invaders.
Stop your pathetic whining about your imaginary claim to this land.
You are descended from very recent immigrants and your claim to this land is no different from any other immigrant.
Are you on peyote or ayahuasca, you ——- idiot.
One cannot possibly be “native” if he “walked across the Bering Strait land bridge from Asia during the last ice age.”
As you stated, he was native, but only to Asia.
One cannot possibly be American if he “arrived about 23,000 years ago,” as America didn’t exist before 1789.
Your ancestors conducted no surveys, established no property, recorded no deeds, established no courts, established no government, and founded no formal nation.
There is raw land that has always been fought for throughout history, and there are countries defined by claims, fundamental law, and borders, to include militaries that protect them.
Abject incompetence and failure is a b—-, isn’t it?
This is some truly disordered thinking.
Are confined somewhere for your own protection.
You seem to think that America did not exist before 1789.
I believe Christopher Columbus would have some thoughts about this.
Do you think that America mysteriously came into existence, by emerging from the sea in 1789?
There was certainly a landmass that existed before 1789.
Just because the immigrants named this land mass “America” does not mean it did not exist before then.
The people who were here before the immigrants like your ancestors showed up had their own territories that they defended and fought over.
Just because your ancestors showed up late and renamed everything does not mean that they created America.
Just because your ancestors imposed European standards of surveys and property deeds does not negate the pre-existing standards of territory that my ancestors lived by.
Just as I thought: Ayahuasca.
If you immigrated across the land bridge, you aren’t native, either.
Yes, our ancestors were unwanted foreign invaders. AS WERE YOURS. When Europeans first encountered your ancestors, whoever they were, they found them holding territory that they had — in most cases quite recently — invaded and conquered from the previous inhabitants, brutally and sadistically slaughtering them all, as was the common practice among all the nations that occupied America at that time.
Our ancestors invaded and conquered that territory, just as your ancestors had, but unlike your ancestors they did not slaughter yours, which is why you were born to complain about it. That’s how it works. And that’s exactly why we don’t want others to come and conquer it from us — especially since they’re more like your ancestors than ours, and are likely to slaughter us as your ancestors tried their level best to do.
You devils don’t know how analogies work.
If I said that the sun is yellow and the flower is yellow,
you idiots would accuse me of suggesting that a flower
can be just as bright and hot as the sun.
if you were a flower, Roundup would be the only option
“. . . you idiots would accuse me . . .”
No. I’d accuse you of not knowing what an analogy is. What you wrote is merely a literal comparison.
Rabble:
Lefties don’t seem to understand more than one thing can be true.
George Soros, his son Alex Soros and the Arabella Advisors network should be charged, tried and if found guilty, sentenced for organized criminal activity and racketeering under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Only then will the Leftist violent agitprop dissipate. Until then, Glocks and ammo are Americans best friend. Armed Americans are all that prevent our nation from becoming another Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, etc.
…..Peter Schweizer highlights recent research by the Government Accountability Institute that explains the deep connections between Soros, fellow billionaire Bill Gates, and a dark-money funding organization called Arabella Advisors. The Arabella network has funded various left-wing groups that have been tied to the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles and the “No Kings” protests this summer in several cities.
“It’s not illegal for Soros, or Elon Musk, to make contributions to political causes,” Schweizer explains. As far as funding groups that incite violence, however, “you don’t have to prove that the head of the [funding] entity knew that they were going to engage in criminal activity. All you have to show is they should have known… So, if I as a funder said, ‘you know what, I’m going to fund this group,’ and I know they have a history of violent protests, and I fund them anyway, even if I never directed or was involved in making the decision to engage in violent protest, I could still be charged under RICO.”
Trump’s threat against Soros is really a rhetorical warning shot aimed at Arabella Advisors and other dark-money funders. Soros gives money to Arabella, which in turn distributes it. Arabella provided nearly $5 million to two left-wing nonprofits involved with protests that turned violent against immigration law enforcement in Los Angeles, according to recent financial disclosures available. One of those groups, Community Change Action, supported the L.A. protests and provided protest tips in Spanish. Its “brainchild,” the Fair Immigration Reform Movement, has trained children how to aggressively protest. Another Arabella-funded group, the “Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles,” has been accused by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) of fomenting “unlawful” unrest during those riots. That group also received more than $50 million in state and federal grants during the Biden administration, according to an investigation by the Washington Examiner.
https://www.clintonfoundationtimeline.com/september-3-2025-schweizer-is-george-soros-a-racketeer/
RICO defined
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a federal law (codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68) targeting organized criminal activity and racketeering. RICO enhances existing criminal punishments and creates new causes of action for acts done as a part of an organized criminal enterprise.
The law was originally passed in 1970 as a part of a larger movement to curb organized crime and to allow victims of organized crime to recover. While the original statute was primarily targeted at the mafia who’s disconnected structure made conviction of high-ranking members difficult due to the inability to tie them directly to crimes, the use of the statute has now been used to take down many notable criminal enterprises.
RICO imposes a maximum criminal penalty of 20 years in prison for violations of the statute. If sentenced the defendant must also forfeit all proceeds obtained while engaging in racketeering activity to the government. To be convicted under RICO, a pattern of racketeering activity is necessary. This means that at least 2 separate activities that can be classified as racketeering must have occurred within 10 years of each other.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/racketeer_influenced_and_corrupt_organizations_act_(rico)
What a bunch of sniveling snotflakes!
Great to see Trump at the US Tennis Open today.
After all, he has been dealing in rackets all his life.
That’s right.
He knows every thing there is to know about rackets.
Are they letting him play in the tennis match ????
I’m sure he would win since he seems to win every golf championship at his clubs.
He even wins golf championships when he doesn’t actually play.
I’ve heard that before.
In that case he would be certain to win the tennis as well.
I’m sure he could win by just watching from the stands.
Why are they even bothering to play the match??
They should just award the trophy to Trump and be done.
Save a lot of time and effort.
The end is near.
*TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING
Looks like George Soros and Media Matters have put out a memo to their mindless drones to yammer on about J6, something the rest of humanity has moved on from as evidenced by the wonderful events of November 5, 2024.
The corrupt “Joe Biden” totalitarian DOJ persecuted and overcharged grandmas for their mere presence that day – something for which the George Soros mindless left-wing totalitarian drones popped champaign corks – and the most corrupt AG in American history, Merrick Garland, is gone and (blessedly) *not* on the Supreme Court (h/t Mitch McConnell).
Oldman– “Looks like George Soros and Media Matters have put out a memo to their mindless drones to yammer on about J6, ”
Yeah, that’s what I thought too.
Turning a blind eye to J6 is like turning a blind eye to the Holocaust. You wouldn’t do THAT would you?
Turning a blind eye to the realities of the Holocaust is like turning a blind eye to partisan/media manipulation of facts
and the realities of propaganda. You wouldn’t do THAT would you?
41,000 hours of footage from objective video cameras can’t be wrong.
The footage that the Select Committee suppressed was very revealing. Capital police fist-bumping protesters, giving them guided tours, etc. Notably absent was violence. The only person who died that day was a protester murdered by a Capitol Police officer.
Only a diseased mind would compare that to the Holocaust, in which 6,000,000 Jews were murdered, as well as hundreds of thousands of others. Sorry bub, you and all your Media Matters buddies have lost what little credibility you had with that ridiculous comparison.
The footage does not lie, but men in power did. The 41,000 hours of video proved that most were peaceful, yet the left twisted the story and imprisoned the innocent. It was not the evidence that failed, but those who were judging it.
The left lies, leaving it to the rest of us to fix things. The Holocaust existed, exterminating the lives of 6 million Jews. J6 is nothing but a fantasy of the left trying to remain in power.
You are correct.
J6 is a fantasy.
Speaking of fantasies Walter, shouldn’t you and your lovely super-spy wife, Mata Hari, be out on your next clandestine operation behind the Iron Curtain.
Or have you moved on to a new fantasy.
James Bond, if you ever meet my wife in the lady’s dressing room, you’ll leave not shaken, not stirred, but permanently changed
Sounds exciting !!!!
Is that how you met her ??
Or is that just one of your more kinky fantasies.
You’re a girlie man. If she tossed her shoes, you would lick the bottom. Does your wife beat you up?
I’m beginning to sense some hostility , Walter.
Why is that ?
The fact that you lead a rich and fulfilling fantasy life is nothing to be ashamed of.
It’s perfectly fine if you get a little kinky.
No hostility; jusst replying naturally to a girlie man.
Walter, I’m trying to understand your obsession with girlie men.
Is this one of your secret fantasies, or do you share this one with your wife.
J6 was an attempted coup. To say otherwise is just not credible. Babbitt was the only one properly brought to justice.
You are a sick, sick person. A political protester being murdered is “justice”? Sick, sick, sick, sick, sick – just like all you left-wing totalitarians. Humanity needs to defend itself from the likes of you.
Anonymous,
By your logic, may we also stipulate that all black men are criminals, therefore ever unarmed back male has been properly brought to justice?
Think about it…
” Babbitt was the only one properly brought to justice.”
Ashli Babbitt was a wife, a daughter, and a veteran.
Unarmed, she was shot down in the Capitol.
You laugh at that? You’re laughing at her mother’s tears, her husband’s empty house, and a life stolen.
The floor can be scrubbed clean. The stain on your soul for mocking the dead never will.
No, it was not an attempted coup. It was a political protest, mostly peaceful; the part that wasn’t peaceful was still a lot less violent than every significant BLM “protest” in the previous six months.
There was no intent to overthrow the USA, no challenge to its authority. UNLIKE the riots in Portland, CHAZ, Minneapolis, etc., which were openly and explicitly rebellions against the authority of the USA. CHAZ literally declared independence; you can’t get more insurrectiony than that.
Lin – you can see that when I referred to the George Soros drones as “mindless” I wasn’t exaggerating. As you can see – and I kid you not – they just compared a political protest in which a few windows got broken to the Holocaust.
Often the Anon comments are facially stupid. I generally avoid them.
Wow, trotting out the Holocaust as a comparison to a political protest? You should be ashamed of yourself.
“Turning a blind eye to J6”
Comparing a protest to a mass slaughter is blindness, and confusing temporary chaos with genocide is pure folly. The Holocaust consumed entire nations, while your argument cannot withstand even a single fact.
Meyer, these are the same people who want male genitalia in women’s locker rooms and showers. They are not sane people. There is something deeply wrong with them. At some level they know it too, which is why they always comment anonymously.
Many of the Anonomi come from the same genetic pool that lives in the biofilm (for the James Bond type, the scum layer). They are sick. My wife says if our daughter were in the dressing room and a man came in pretending to be a woman, she would pretend to be a bat and send him where he belonged.
Walter, this is a fascinating fantasy.
When you say that your daughter turns into a bat, would that be the flying mammal?
Is this part of your Batman fantasy?
Does she play the part of Batgirl in this fantasy.
Walter, that was me, James Bond, above in case you didn’t realize.
Sounds like you were already caught in the lady’s dressing room; another woman had you squealing in a high-pitched voice.
Walter, I am definitely sensing an unhealthy level of anger and hostility.
Why is that??
Relax, nobody is judging you for indulging in kinky fantasies.
Walter, I am also sensing that you have an unusual obsession with girlie men.
Why is that ?
Does your wife know about this obsession ?
You are a girlie man unaccepted by men and women, no matter their sexual preferences. Because you squeal so much, they think you are a pig.
Hmmm!!!
So you not only have obsessions and fantasies about girlie men, but you also have obsessions and fantasies about animals.
This fantasy about animals is rather unusual, and not particularly healthy.
Do you share this fantasy with your wife?
Does your psychiatrist know about your fantasies concerning animals.
James Bond? More like Sigmund Fraud, showing off a psych Duh-gree earned in the psych wards and never sober enough to walk on his own.
Unfortunately, disrupting the peaceful democratic process taking place inside the Capitol was seen as a victory by the rioters.
Best Anonymous post in a long time.
I withdraw that reply. I was responding to what was a blank Anonymous comment on my screen.
Would one of you treasonous, anti-Constitution, anti-American, communist idiots mind telling me who the President of the United States is?
Bill Clinton?
Trump supporters had a guillotine at the Capitol riot.
And they should have used it! Save Democracy – behead a democrat. Hell, save humanity – behead a democrat. Things can’t go kinetic quickly enough.
Would one of you treasonous, anti-Constitution, anti-American, communist idiots mind telling me who the President of the United States is?
“Our democracy” is their wealth-redistributed and socially engineered communism.
“Our democracy” is not the rational restricted-vote republic under the Constitution of the American Founders—that is the Constitution that provides maximal freedom to individuals and severely limits and restricts government.
There is only one solution for mankind: The Constitution and Bill of Rights of the American Founders, 1789.
That is: Freedom and Self-Reliance.
Parasitism, central planning, control of the means of production, redistribution of wealth, and social engineering, as in “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs,” as imposed by the “dictatorship of the proletariat,” which is the “hired help,” are certain death for humanity.
Absolute private property was anathema to Karl Marx; what’s that tell you?
Communism is unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court has not received the memo.
ENJOY THE SHOW!
You mean like the ‘smart’ ones that Hussein wanted to put in the FEMA camps?
This somehow reminded me of Madame Roland whose death on the guillotine still shocks and I have wondered how many responsible felt deep shame for the evil they had done.
As random thoughts go I then thought of the shame the UK police should feel for what they do every day and particularly in Dundee where a platoon of kitted up police thugs guided the Scottish Lassie down the public street to jail for trying to protect her sister. One suspects these ‘officers’ would also drag her to the Scotish Place de Revolution and the waiting guillotine just as willingly if Britain continues its slide down.
And that jogged another thought, did those who dragged Anne Frank from her shelter feel no shame? Were a gang of brutes also dragging that poor girl away? Yes.
Somehow the great, same Evil unites all of it. And where is the shame? Or at least a shred of embarrassment? How does one expunge so much of his humanity that he can do these things and congratulate himself for a job well done?
We should be alarmed at the growing viciousness of Left.
Douglas Murray speaks lucidly about the horrors of October 7 and the spreading infection of evil in the West that condoned or justified celebrations of those atrocities on our streets and campuses and in the media.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Zn9j8tkKJM
Among some there is joy where there should be shame.
Young: interesting comment, yours.
I’m thinking of Madame Roland’s famous words prior to her death, “Oh Liberty, what crimes are committed in thy name!”
and how relevant that is today– when I hear one political party threatening the impending “death of democracy” if we don’t elect their representatives, —while, at the same time— rioting and censoring and throwing Molotov cocktails and smashing windows and cars, and instigating destruction of the other–all in the name of “saving democracy.”
Lin,
Yes, famous words by Madam Roland. I recall that before mounting the scaffold she also said [paraphrase] “I have just had the most extraordinary thought. May I have a scrap of paper to write it down?” She was refused. I wish she had been given the chance. Arthur Young who toured France in the early stages of the Revolution stayed briefly with the Roland couple and noticed Madam but thought her husband was the major figure in the family. That was one of the few errors this astute observer made in his journal. By far Madam was the powerhouse intellect in the family. Her husband committed suicide when he learned of her death.
Another extraordinary victim was the lawyer Malesherbes who defended the king at his trial. Other lawyers feared for his life for daring to defend one slated for death. Their fears were justified. Malesherbes and his entire family were sent to the guillotine. He should be a saint in the legal profession as, probably, should be John Adams who defended the soldiers in the Boston Massacre.
Our modern Left has taken a page from the Jacobins by attacking lawyers who dared to represent Trump or his allies. Now that the worm has turned I bet some of them wish they had used a guillotine instead of prosecution and disbarment.
Lin, with respect to Madam Roland’s famous remark I think there was a statue of liberty in the square that, when she saw it, prompted her remark. Ours, of course, was not the first statue of liberty. Interesting as an aside that she, Liberty, is dressed as a Roman.
OK. So you have guillotines.
How many guns do you have?
Asking for a friend, of course.
Last year the ATF stated 700 million guns in circulation.
As a note to the progressives, ownership is not marksmanship or tactics. Careful what you wish.for.
Is displaying a piece of art worse than breaking into a government building?
Yes, if you happen to be a green cult member carrying soup near a Van Gogh painting.
Why don’t you get tested for Alzheimer’s?
Too dull to understand the reference, eh?
If you were referring to J6 they were let in… When the radical liberals bombed the Capitol what happened to them?
They were prosecuted, overcharged, and persecuted by the totalitarian “Joe Biden” DOJ. The guillotine carriers are left alone. I’m not saying they shouldn’t be, just that it’s apples and oranges. The person who asked the question is not intelligent.
That is a lie. You told it. That makes you a liar.
That was an improper way to gain entry into a government building.
It was unscheduled and caused a lot of panic.
Where were their invitations?
The Trump supporters were the anarchists on J6.
The Left is becoming desperate as they watch Trump dismantle their crooked apparatus, and there’s nothing they can do about it. So their go-to, of course, is performative, a mock guillotine. It is laughable.
Hit the left with something more than just performative…..spray them down with mustard gas and a bullet between the eyes.
What is laughable is that you are so scared of an art display.
What is laughable is that you think you are intelligent.
Professor, you left out one of the most egregious Democrat examples. In the months following the 2016 election Bernie Sanders gave many angry speeches around the country decrying Trump’s victory. It became a staple of his, pounding on the podiums with his angry look and wild hair, angrily shaking his fist in the air while telling his audiences to “make them pay!”, and similar inciteful rhetoric. He kept that up in every appearance until one of his supporters and campaign workers, James Hodgkinson, took him up on it and shot up the Republican Congressional baseball practice on June 14, 2017, in the process badly wounding Steve Scalise. Bernie went kind of silent on the subject for a while after that, but only for a while, and never, so far as I’m aware, retracted any of what he had said.