The Three Rs: Clinton and Weingarten Return to Republicans, Rage, and Recrimination

Many people are calling out former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for a posting supporting American Federation of Teachers (AFT) chief Randi Weingarten’s new book in which she paints her political opponents as “fascists.” The timing was flagged as, at best, tone deaf in the wake of the assassination of Charlie Kirk by a shooter who wrote fascist references on his bullets and was clearly radicalized by such rage rhetoric. For me, the timing was most notable in how Weingarten and Clinton are again pushing their extreme rhetoric as a new report emerged showing the utter failure of our schools to actually educate our children. Weingarten and Clinton cannot be bothered by the long-standing declines in education. They are returning to the three Rs: Republicans, Rage, and Recrimination.

Weingarten is “credited” with turning the teacher’s union into an extension of the Democratic Party, often appearing at political rallies with her signature high-volume screeds:

Clinton pushed the use of education to paint opponents as fascists: “Congratulations to my friend [Weingarten] on ‘Why Fascists Fear Teachers.’ From banning books to controlling curriculum, authoritarians go after public education because it’s a cornerstone of democracy.”

Schools have become the cornerstone of a political strategy as opposed to actual education. As Weingarten and Clinton were pushing the fascism attacks, a new study showed just how badly teacher’s unions and administrators have failed our students.

While Weingarten and other unions have poured millions into democratic  and liberal campaigns, they have done little to improve education for millions of students.

394 thoughts on “The Three Rs: Clinton and Weingarten Return to Republicans, Rage, and Recrimination”

  1. The demise of the American education “system” is not by accident. The powers deep in the bowels of the apparatchik swamp do not want critical thinking moralistic youth. They demand ignorant easily indoctrinated youth that can be conditioned to demand convenience now or they throw a tantrum.

    1. A young woman, an elected Democrat hajji Muslim, married her brother, used that to get elected, and said she saw a video of Charlie Kirk saying all Muslims must be murdered.

  2. Her husband announced to the world, “there were people like me sitting in offices, day after day after day, who did not fully appreciate the depth and the speed with which you were being engulfed by this unimaginable terror.”
    HE’S A LIAR
    HE KNEW
    HE KNEW
    AND HE CHOSE NOT TO LIFT A FINGER
    AND HE LIED

    We of all people alive on this small blue planet are the most disgraceful people of all time. Today, we kill and battle each other because someone said something.

  3. Now You can earn Up To from 99000$ A Month! There are no limitations, Be Your Own Boss, it All depends on you And how much you want to earn each day. This is a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn a huge sum of money at home. Join this right now…

  4. To regard conservatives as fascists like leftist progressives are always eager to do these days, it is essential that everyone educate themselves about the origins of fascism. When Mussolini first introduced the term, it was not as a conservative but instead as a revolutionist opposing the status quo. He was not one who set out to preserve both traditional values and the classical liberalism enshrined in representative democracies as conservatives do, but rather to wholly upend them. As he followed in Il Duce’s steps, the same is said for Hitler and his brand of fascism that came to be known as Nazism. Neither dictator was a classical liberal in the sense conservatives are. Like their revolutionary and authoritarian characteristics their ideologies did not derive from being on the right, but rather quite distinctly from being on the left. Today when leftist progressives describe themselves as “anti-fascists”, they are not at all what they claim to be and in effect are simply hiding their very own and distinct brand of authoritarianism.

    1. Mussolini, like his father before him, was a socialist. When they booted him from the party, Mussolini contrived his own authoritarian party and called it after a Roman symbol, the fasces.

      One of Charlie’s best was when some dingbat girl didn’t know what fascist meant and blew it off with the comment “I’m not into all that political science stuff.” You really can’t make up this insanity, but I believe it is so close to what was going on in Europe in the 1930s.

      1. NAZI National Socialist German Workers Party.

        That is left wing. It was called right wing to appease Stalin and the Russians. Hitler.snd Stalin were jealous if each other nso.hated each other.

        1. In January 1933, the Nazis initially formed a coalition government with the German National People’s Party (DNVP), a conservative and nationalist party. They did not go into coalition with any Communists or true Socialists.

        2. I always felt that the reason why people consider fascism as being right-wing is because of academics in the world of academia during the late 1960s and early 70s. Since most colleges and universities’ professors were starting to become more and more progressive in their ways of thinking. They didn’t like the fact socialism and fascism were on the same side of the same coin and as such, use their positions of influence to change the narrative.

      2. Bolshevik Party
        RSDLP
        Russian Social Democratic Labor Party

        Impossible not to see they are alike, both left wing socialism. Both led by dictators. Both wanting to spread their ideology world wide. Both very repressive.

  5. Dear Prof Turley,

    Who won the debate? Unless the rules were ‘woke’ little league soft ball rules – where everyone is a winner – there must have been a winner? That’s reason we have debates and so forth.. . to determine the best ideas and scientific discoveries.

    In any case, Biden is in a padded room where he belongs, and Hillary never made a lick of sense. .. I miss the days where the only thing I knew about the ‘leftist vermin scum’ was Slick Willy noodling Monica.

    *sorely disappointed U.S. Atty. Alex Acosta’s testimony before the oversight committee was behind closed doors .. . I have very little confidence in the Left’s line of questioning, especially behind closed doors.

    1. <>

      What a bunch of right wing Christian nationalist bullsh!t. Right, we’ll have objective analysis based on debates in which YOU choose the contexts and the “facts.” If we had a truly fair debate of the best ideas, Bronze Age mythologies would be put out of their misery. Instead, you support forcing schoolchildren to be indoctrinated by religious kooks.

      Watch “A Boy and His Dog.” Topeka is the MAGA paradise you so fervently seek.

      1. Christian nationalist

        Hahaha! The bogeyman of the Left. Doesn’t exist, but the imagined monster haunts the little boys and girls of the Left at night, coming out of their closets or out from under their beds.

        Yo, bozo – far from “right wing,” DGS is one of our liberal commenters.

          1. DEIst (e.g. racist,sexist)?

            Democratic Socialist (e.g. Dezi)?

            Was he a leftist who entertains abortive ideation? The wicked solution.

            How is “nationalism” relevant?

          2. Should I care ? Kirk was a christian and he was a patriot.

            Those of you on the left are about the most unchristian one can be.
            you think of no one but yourselves – and you do not even mannage to do well for yourselves.

            Most of us have won the lottery have won the lottery of life – we are fotunate enough to have ben born in the US.
            Idiots like you demand that all lottery winnings be distributed eually – so if you manage to win a billion dolar lottery – you lucky to walk away with $0.15 – as is every other person in the world, so no one truly benefits.

            Your idiotic left wing nonsense has universally left everyone poorer.

          3. The Catholic Intellectual Tradition is one of the towering edifices of civilization. Even the secular Enlightenment from which modern Liberalism flows, and the Human Rights tradition, could not have taken root in a soil other than that laid down by Augustine, Aquinas, and Dante. That’s why leftists hate Christianity so much. They are anti Knowledge, anti Reason, and anti Individualism.

            1. “. . . secular Enlightenment [. . .] in a soil other than that laid down by Augustine . . .”

              Some 1,300 years passed from Augustine to the Enlightenment. What took so long?

              BTW, most of those centuries were your religious ideology — the Dark and Middle Ages.

              1. “BTW, most of those centuries were your religious ideology — the Dark and Middle Ages.”

                Does that description include the Hebrew/Jewish religious ideology? How about cultures other than the European nations i.e. India, Asian, and other cultures?

                And what about that other religious ideology?

                When did the religious ideology of the rock fairy religion of atheism begin? While Christianity and Judaeism have each gone through various versions of reform, the cult religion of atheism has never reformed, is still the preferred religious ideology of the true believers and brainwashed disciples of Karl Marx and communism.

      2. We must be talking cross-purposes. Only a cock-eyed surrealist would, or could, confuse me with a ‘Christian nationalist’ .. . much less a Maga minion.

        *ask anybody.

      3. During the enlightenment Christianity was well tethered to reason. It isn’t iron age anymore.

        It remains true there are still fundamentalists and televangelists.

        1. “It remains true there are still fundamentalists and televangelists.”
          Most of whom are better people than you.

          I am no fan of Jerry Falwell – but he did not assassinate anyone. Nor did he preach the murder of those who he disagreed with.

          If my choice is between fundimentalists, televangelists and the woke left – I pick christian nationalists all the time.

          1. Is Jerry Falwell Jr. An example of a fine upstanding Christian fundamentalist.

            I believe he paid a pool boy for 7 years to have sex with his wife while he watched and masturbated.

            Christian family values indeed.

            1. “Is Jerry Falwell Jr. An example of a fine upstanding Christian fundamentalist.”

              Why would Jerry Falwell Jr. be the name that sprung to mind as a fine upstanding Christian? How could you forget the far more recent fine upstanding Christian you kept voting for: the devout Catholic who is fondly remembered as President Daddy-Daughter Inappropriate Incest Showers?

              As you think of those YEARS of incest showers with his daughter, raping a female intern while a senator, fondling other peoples’ children and funding his childrens’ illegal drugs and underage Russian hookers that you voted for… it’s Falwell that first comes to mind?

              Democrat analysis of Christian values indeed!

      4. Show me where the Christians hurt you on the little doll.

        Yes we should force school children to be indoctrinated in woke leftist trans ideology so they go out and kill Christians after mutilating their own genitals. So much better.

        Do you even realize how silly your comments are? You are a joke.

        Only paid Parochial schools teach Christian ideology. We want public schools to teach the basics, reading, math and accepted science. Not vodoo climate science.

      5. ROFL
        Tyler robinson did not assassinate anyone – until your ilk got a hold of him.

        If the choice is between having the values of christianity forced on you and YOUR values – the former atleast will not bring the world to bloodshed.

      6. MYTH?
        You cannot prove that. Why do you keep saying that like you have facts to support your silliness. Watch this. Prove He is a myth. Go right ahead. Waiting.

      7. “Right, we’ll have objective analysis based on debates in which YOU choose the contexts and the ‘facts.'”

        These are the very same people who believe it’s normal to attempt to tell little boys that, with a little chemical castration and self mutilation, they too can Tranny into becoming a furry little girl.

        Once again the Democrat communist acolytes who follow Marx’s rock fairy religion of atheism are going to try and convince everybody that people like Charlie Kirk would ONLY debate those willing to stick to the topics and facts he chose. If anybody brought up anything else – he would have them removed from the microphone. No communist Democrat atheists allowed!

    2. The Epstein Files are not being released because Slick Willy was noodling women on the Island.
      Along with a cast of political aristocrats that bit the Apple in Epstein’s garden.

      1. It’s on every street corner. It’s about Epstein’s money. It’s like fleas on a dog.

        Go round up the teens on corners if you care so much or maybe read porn to 2nd graders in schools.

    3. Jezzz where have you been. Both parties have done many things behind closed doors. This is not the first time.

    1. That’s an interesting kink to have. Somehow, with Republicans controlling all aspects of the federal government, not one charge has been raised against Hillary Clinton.

      Anyway, in this imaginary scene are you in the prison shower dropping soap as an enticement?

  6. I dreamt after the Charlie Kirk assassination that other outspoken individuals would in the not too distant future be dispatched in similar fashion.
    The Professor’s piece today draws attention to no fewer than two individuals who at least privately were thrilled at Kirk’s demise and who are among the most unhappy human beings in America today.

  7. School Choice = extremely important
    Throwing $$ at schools = not working
    Math proficiency = 12%
    Reading proficiency = 35%
    Weingarten = very well compensated
    Right to Work = essential

    1. Right on. Have you seen some of the illiterate door prizes who attend Trump rallies? We failed them when they attended school.

  8. Something is terribly wrong in America.

    Radical weirdos have no innate right to control America’s children.

    Unions are illegal and unconstitutional criminal organizations and have no legal or constitutional power to compel or configure contracts.

    Public schools must be managed directly by elected officials that hire, fire, pay, and direct.

    President Trump must simply eliminate unions starting with teacher and public employee unions.

    The Department of Labor has no citable legal basis, is unconstitutional and pure communism and must be eliminated.

    Unions have no legal bargaining positions; their only bargaining positions are breach of contract, trespass, threats of property damage, and bodily injury.

    The first crime of unions is breach of contract, a job action or strike, where they fail to perform which means showing up for work.

    Further, they trespass, harass and commit vandalism, property damage and bodily injury.

      1. He is also prefers poorly educated workers for his Amazon warehouses working for minimum wage.
        That’s how he makes his billions.

        He is very much in favor schools that fail to educate students.

        1. “He is also prefers poorly educated workers for his Amazon warehouses working for minimum wage.
          That’s how he makes his billions.”
          Absolutely correct – Bezos is giving jobs to people the left has so abysmally educated that no one else will hire them. Better still he has managed to actually make them productive.

          Whether you like it or not, Amazon works – AS YOU note – poorly educated people get jobs, and the rest of us get the stuff we want fast and cheap – that is a win-win.

          And if Bezos can make billions by giving people who could not otherwise get them jobs, and by giving the rest of us things we want for prices we are willing to pay – More power to him.

          That is precisely how the free market is supposed to work.

          The fact that you find something wrong with that is proof you are clueless.

          What do you want ? Bezos to fire everyone, start over with better educated people that he must pay more so that our products cost more so we by less so fewer and fewer people have jobs ?

          1. John Say
            So why are you constantly whining here about the failed education system.
            Everything is just hunky dory for Bezos and his ilk.
            It seems the system is working as planned by the wealthy oligarchs who are really in control of this regime.

            1. Ano

              Bezos has nothing to do with education. Teachers union sure does and doing a poor job. notice that most well to do libs send their kids to private schools. So that’s the real issue.
              Try harder

        2. “. . . Amazon warehouses working for minimum wage.”

          Actually, about half aren’t paid any wage. They’re robots.

          The other half, the humans, are paid with benefits an average of some $30/hour.

          Nice try, comrade communist.

      2. So you claim unions makes better workers? So what happened to Boeing.
        Yet Musk makes rockets that go into space and come back, without a union.

  9. Becoming cognate of the licensed Medias doctrine to be fair and balanced: I found it had been abandoned after my return from Nam, hearing the major players paint negative pictures of soldiers through words and altered photos or film. Hutley/Brinkly, Walters and a host of others, locally and nationally, tilted so far left they feel over into the abyss of nearsightedness where a soldier became a pariah. They learned they could be commentators passing their interpretation of the news as factual when it was nothing more than supposition, ya know “Like’. Not until FOX Cable came about could you find the Other Side of the political equation that wasn’t painted with leftist dribble. This week’s example is telling about the blindness to factual information when it’s derogatory to the fool.

    1. Walter Cronkite, notable trusted journalist as it were, did one of the first shock jock’s and turned leftist dove. A lot of people back then were taken in by that dribble of a report. Supposedly reporting fact when it was nothing more than uninformed or misinformed supposition.

      “Cronkite’s Vietnam Blunder”
      –July 12, 2012, By: Robert W. Merry

      https://nationalinterest.org/feature/cronkites-vietnam-blunder-7185

      ——————————————–
      –Oddball
      “Take it easy Big Joe, some of these people got sensitive feelings.”

      1. Walter Cronkite, DEEP DEEP STATE propagandist extraordinaire. The “trust” was entirely “fake” and utterly undeserved.

      1. Unfortunately they were absolutely suckers in Vietnam. The DEEP DEEP STATE spilled their blood for ten years and then just up and left and came home to plan a new scheme.

        McShame was total idiot who was shot down because of his own blunders.

        The 4 Other Times John McCain Cheated Death
        August 27, 2018

        The late naval aviator and U.S. Sen. John McCain’s experiences as a POW at the “Hanoi Hilton” in the Vietnam War are well-known, but many aren’t aware of the other times McCain nearly died during his time in service.

        The Original “Maverick”: Crash in Corpus Christi

        In his early aviator days, McCain was known for his aggressive hot-dogging as a pilot, not unlike Tom Cruise’s “Maverick” in “Top Gun.” On March 12, 1960, the 23-year-old lieutenant was playing it fast and loose during a training mission in his AD-6 Skyraider. He was practicing a landing when he crashed into Corpus Christi Bay, shearing the skin off his plane’s wings.

        In his autobiography, McCain claims that “the engine quit while I was practicing landings,” but a Navy investigation board saw it differently, stating that he used “a power setting too low to maintain level flight in a turn.” Talk about writing checks your body can’t cash — but that didn’t prevent McCain from having a good time shortly afterward, as he explains in his autobiography: “I took a few painkillers and hit the sack to rest my aching back for a few hours. … I was out carousing, injured back and all, later that evening.”

        A Shocking Close Call

        Just more than a year later in December 1961, McCain was in a Skyraider once again, this time during a training mission over southern Spain, when he flew into electrical wires, causing a local blackout.

        It was reported that when he returned to the carrier USS Intrepid, 10 feet of power line trailed from his plane, along with a severed oil line, but he managed to land safely. Still, one can imagine the disaster that might have occurred if the collision played out slightly differently. Some still talk about the day as the time McCain “turned the lights out in Spain.”

        Christmas Crash in the Chesapeake

        On Nov. 28, 1965, McCain was flying back to his family in Meridian, Mississippi, from the Army-Navy game in Philadelphia, with Christmas presents for the family stashed on the plane. Over Chesapeake Bay, his engine failed, and he was forced to bail out. Biographer Robert Timberg described the scene: “‘I’ve got a flame-out,'” he radioed. He went through the standard relight procedures three times. At one thousand feet, he ejected, landing on the deserted beach moments before the plane slammed into a clump of trees. … The Navy classified it as a ‘routine ejection.'”

        After a naval investigation, it was determined that the plane had failed due to an “undetermined component of the engine.” McCain had escaped death’s clutches once more, even though his Christmas presents had burned up in the crash.

        The Forrestal Disaster

        It’s known as one of the most tragic days in modern Navy history, and McCain was at the heart of it. On July 29, 1967, now-Lt. Cdr. McCain was flying bombing missions over North Vietnam from the aircraft carrier USS Forrestal. He was sitting in his A-4 Skyhawk, loaded with two 1,000-pound bombs, waiting for his turn to launch, when a Zuni missile was accidentally fired from another aircraft and struck either McCain’s plane or the one next to him (evidence to this day is unclear on this point).

        As McCain himself described it in a 1967 statement: “I heard a loud explosion and immediate fire all around the airplane … Smoke and flame were around the cockpit so I unstrapped … and unplugged my oxygen hose, keeping my visor down. I looked to the aft of the airplane and saw nothing but flame and I could see burning fuel in front and around the airplane, but it did not look too bad to the forward. I opened the canopy and walked out on the refueling probe and jumped from the end of it, landing just on the edge of the fire and rolled clear.”

        As it turns out, McCain barely escaped incineration, as the first bomb on his plane “cooked off” and exploded seconds after he escaped. The resulting explosions and fire killed 134 sailors. The Forrestal was put out of action for two years, and three months later, McCain’s jet would be shot down over North Vietnam, resulting in his incarceration in the “Hanoi Hilton” for more than five years.

        https://www.military.com/history/4-times-john-mccain-cheated-death

  10. The thing that is so sad is that while people like Randy Weingarten, Joy Reid and Rachel Maddow have long called Trump Hitler and a fascist they really seem to fail history. I think we need a remedial history class for Democratic leaders. There were protests against Hitler for events such as the invasion of Czechoslovakia. The leaders of that were tried for treason and executed in about 2 months. The reality is each of those 3 would have been dead long ago if Trump were Hitler. Further, Hitler was a high control socialist whose government structure mirrored much of the structure of the Bolsheviks. 5 year plans, price fixing boards, production boards setting production quotas. Hitler himself said in speeches that Marxism and National Socialism are basically the same. The differences were that some private property was allowed to exist and unlike the Bolsheviks Hitler did not take babies away from couples to have them raised entirely by the state. (a policy that was eventually discontinued)

    1. Another difference – reflected in the word Nazi (national socialist) – is that the socialism espoused by Hitler was only for the nation of Germany. People were told to sacrifice themselves for the greater good of Germany, rather than for the greater good of the worldwide worker class. Civil rights were entirely foreign to both the USSR and Nazi Germany because such rights are diametrically opposed to socialism, whether national or international.

      1. A student of history would know that Nazism was not a socialist system, especially after 1934. Nazis rejected fundamental principles of socialism.

        To say that Hitler understood the value of language would be an enormous understatement. Propaganda played a significant role in his rise to power. To that end, he paid lip service to the tenets suggested by a name like National Socialist German Workers’ Party, but his primary—indeed, sole—focus was on achieving power whatever the cost and advancing his racist, anti-Semitic agenda. After the failure of the Beer Hall Putsch, in November 1923, Hitler became convinced that he needed to utilize the teetering democratic structures of the Weimar government to attain his goals.

        Over the following years the brothers Otto and Gregor Strasser did much to grow the party by tying Hitler’s racist nationalism to socialist rhetoric that appealed to the suffering lower middle classes. In doing so, the Strassers also succeeded in expanding the Nazi reach beyond its traditional Bavarian base. By the late 1920s, however, with the German economy in free fall, Hitler had enlisted support from wealthy industrialists who sought to pursue avowedly anti-socialist policies. Otto Strasser soon recognized that the Nazis were neither a party of socialists nor a party of workers, and in 1930 he broke away to form the anti-capitalist Schwarze Front (Black Front). Gregor remained the head of the left wing of the Nazi Party, but the lot for the ideological soul of the party had been cast.

        Hitler allied himself with leaders of German conservative and nationalist movements, and in January 1933 German President Paul von Hindenburg appointed him chancellor. Hitler’s Third Reich had been born, and it was entirely fascist in character. Within two months Hitler achieved full dictatorial power through the Enabling Act. In April 1933 communists, socialists, democrats, and Jews were purged from the German civil service, and trade unions were outlawed the following month. That July Hitler banned all political parties other than his own, and prominent members of the German Communist Party and the Social Democratic Party were arrested and imprisoned in concentration camps. Lest there be any remaining questions about the political character of the Nazi revolution, Hitler ordered the murder of Gregor Strasser, an act that was carried out on June 30, 1934, during the Night of the Long Knives. Any remaining traces of socialist thought in the Nazi Party had been extinguished.

        Do you want to revise your ridiculously shallow statement above?

        1. True. The word “Nationalsozialistische” (national socialism) did not mean socialism as an economic system. The Nazis saw that as evil. By “national socialism” the Nazis meant loyalty to the German Volk, which is achieved through racial purity.

          1. OldMan never admits an error. This one is pretty straightforward. Anyone who actually thinks Nazis believed in Socialism either died before 1934 or has been seriously misinformed.

            But this is more important than calling out someone’s mistake. Democratic backsliding, similar to what happened in Weimar Germany, is not often linear. The messaging used by authoritarian leaders often evolves to whatever best enables them to secure total control.

            You see this today (and repeatedly over the last century) with Turkiye, for example.

            1. Mussolini was a fascist. He and Giovanni Gentile wrote the books on Italian fascism. Gentile was a communist who altered communism in a way that manipulated an impossible dream into something that could work

              1. SM – correct – and fascism is a form of socialism.
                It has never pretended otherwise.

                These poorly educated idiots on the left who have had morons tell them that the Fascists all LIED when they said they were socialists, are clueless about actual history.
                Authoritarians seek power and socialism offers unfettered power.

                1. “the ideologies were so close they were competing for the same followers.”

                  True. Fascism exists because communism failed. Socialism is the word used today because of that failure. All of these leftwing socialists are fascists because no one has ever been able to create the dream. Fascism is as far as they can go.

                  Some on the left are screaming at Trump because he is taking 10% of Intel, but that is what communism and socialism are all about. No or limited private ownership. I am not sure of the economics and politics behind this, but if he looks to do the same with other companies, I am against it.

            2. ATS – if you beleive the nonsense you are spewing – all you are doing is proving your own lack of intellect, and the poor and biased nature of your education.

              Absolutely the left has to pretend that Nazi’s were not socialist – just as they have to ignore that Pol Pot was a socialist, and Mao was and Lennin and Stalin were and Castro was and Peron was and …. a long list of bloody failed socialist dictators running from the russian revolution through to Maduro in Venezuela today.

              Are there subtle differences between these different incarnations of socialism – absolutely.

              But ALL share in common near total state control of the economy – regardless of who owns it. And There are may other attributes they also share.
              But it is the state control of the economy that is the defining characteristic of socialism.

            3. “The messaging used by authoritarian leaders often evolves to whatever best enables them to secure total control.”

              Correct – and the message that universally allows an authoritarian leader to Grow power is SOCIALISM.

              Socialism is literally about growing govenrment control.

              There is no example anywhere in the world of small government socialism.
              There is no example anywhere in the world of big government that is not socialist.

              Authoritarians seek power and the message that brings them power is socialism.

              This is why since Marx totalitarian states have all been socialist.

              These two things fit hand in glove.

              Socialism attracts tyrants

          2. Absolutely FALSE.
            The German economic system – was top down and controlled by the government.
            While it allowed for private ownership of the means of production – that production was absolutely totally subservient to the NAZI Government. I would note that even the Russians under Lennin tried that for a time – and to a very large extent that is exactly how China is today under Xi. Xi’s china is ALSO an example of Fascism – one of the more pure examples very very similar to that of Nazi German – and make no mistake the CCP is still Socialist.

            I would further note that the british economy to a lessor extent was run in the same socialist fashion both during and after the War – in fact Much of Europe – interestingly EXCEPT Germany followed the same socialist economic plan – atleast until it fell apart starting in the 60’s through the 80’s
            Thatcher significantly though not completely overcame the socialist economic system in the UK, as over the years has much of Europe.

            Conversely – despite FDR’s prewar efforts to slide the US into socialism, as FDR grasped that WWII was coming, he reversed course. It was unfettered capitalism that made the US the arsenal of democracy out producing the rest of the allies and the axis combined.

          3. “Nationalsozialistische” (national socialism) did not mean socialism as an economic system.

            Of course it did.
            “The Nazis saw that as evil.”
            ROFL – no the Nazi’s like ALL Fascists saw that as essential.

            Racial purity was a core element of German fascism – it was not consequential with Italian fascism. But fixations on racial purity are found in other socialist and fascist systems.
            Pol Pot, Increasingly in China.

            There are TWO core – and inseparable elements of Socialism.

            The first is government control of the economy – you are a complete moron if you do not grasp that the Nazi Government maintained ABSOLUTE control of the economy
            That is not only a central tenant of socialism it is a central tenant of fascism – which is a part of why facism is just a form of socialism – as per every fascist ever.
            The second which is inseparable from the first is Big Government. Government control and small govenrment are irreconcilable.

          4. “The word “Nationalsozialistische” (national socialism) did not mean socialism as an economic system.”

            BS.

            The Nazi economic system was thoroughly socialistic — including redistribution of wealth via extensive welfare programs, government planning and control of industry, and the virtual elimination of private property.

        2. First, until you use a screen name, your credibility is close to nil.

          Second, your position seems to be that the Nazis themselves called it socialism, but you really know better than them, because that was just a subterfuge to fool all the people through rhetoric. I take them at their word. You notably failed to define what you view as socialism or demonstrate that those characteristics were absent from Nazi governance.

          Third, if your point is that their brand of socialism had many characteristics of fascism, then I don’t deny that. They’re both opposed to civil rights for individuals, which is what I stressed, but you apparently failed to notice. They’re both for a large and powerful central government to rule in an authoritarian way. In terms of their use today, the Dems always describe Trump as fascist – I’d be wealthy if I had a nickel for every time that happened – but in reality it was the extremist cabal pulling the strings of the “Joe Biden” puppet that most resembled authoritarianism, along with the extremists of the Justin Trudeau administration in Canada. Prime examples were the Orwellian “ministry of truth” they tried to set up, their government-social-media censorship complex, deplatforming and debanking. It was the Dems who weaponized the DOJ to persecute concerned moms who spoke up at school board meetings, dads praying outside abortion clinics, and traditional Catholics who celebrated the Latin mass. Trudeau debanked the truckers who objected to being coerced by his authoritarian government into injecting an experimental brew of chemicals into their bodies. It was Trudeau who invoked the Emergency Act against a peaceful protest and used mounted police to crush grannies in the street.

          You have no credibility until you admit that those were fascistic moves by the “Joe Biden” and Trudeau administrations.

          1. The devaluation of the individual for the common good is a core value of fascism and socialism
            A large and powerful central govenrment is a core value of both fascism and socialism

            Socialism is an economic system where the means of production are controlled by the govenrment – that requires a large powerful government. The two are inseparable.
            I would not the converse is also true – there are no large powerful central governments that do not also excercise substantial control over the means of production.

            Facism is by its very nature a form of socialism.
            All socialist systems are not fascist, though most have strong elements of fascism.
            But all fascist systems are socialist.

        3. Thank you for your dissertation taken directly from the Encyclopedia Britannica. Since you copied it, my guess is you don’t understand the real similarities between communism and fascism. Oldmanfromkansas wasn’t wrong. There are two ways of looking at fascism and socialism (communism). From the eyes of an American, both are quite similar because our American Republic exists in a different spectrum. America is free, and they are totalitarian. To make things simple, one can divide fascism into 2 types, fascism A and fascism B. Fascism B is communism, which got stuck in fascism A. Russia never met Lenin’s or Marx’s goals.

          1. Since you copied it . . .

            Good catch, Meyer. That must be why the copy-pasta troll doesn’t use a screen name.

            As Trump said in a SOTU: America will never be a socialist nation.

            One little tidbit from a lawyer’s perspective: the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment is opposed to socialism. When private property is taken by the government, it can only be taken for a public use, and only upon payment of just compensation to the property owner to make him whole.

          2. SM I would take car equating communism to socialism.
            While there is probably not a communist in the world that does not believe that socialism is the road to communism – the converse is NOT true.
            All socialists are not pretending that communism is the end.

            And this is absolutely true of the Fascists.
            Fascists are socialists – they are absolutely NOT communists.
            We tend to equate them. Marxist theory has socialism as a way point on the roard to communism – but AGAIN all socialists are not Marxists – even if they are all heavily influenced by Marx.

            Fascists were absolutely socialists, but they were virulently anti-communist.
            Part of that was because the ideologies were so close they were competing for the same followers. Part of it is because the authoritarian nature of socialism was the END for Facists, and just a way point to utopia for actual communists.

            Most of us conflate socialism and communism
            because there is no example of sucessful communism with more than a handful of people for more than a short period of time. Communism is a non-existent utopian vison that some socialists see as the end.

            1. ” I would take car equating communism to socialism.”

              John, the problem being faced is a change in meaning of the words. Marx used communism and socialism interchangeably early on. Since then, socialism has been treated as communism lite.

              “And this is absolutely true of the Fascists.
              Fascists are socialists – they are absolutely NOT communists.”

              As I mentioned earlier, I think of it this way. The path to communism ended before the completion of the impossible. No government disappeared, leaving a totalitarian government. The conversion to no private property stopped leaving some private property in the hands of citizens, but the private use of it was constrained and dictated by the state. That is what we call fascism.

              “but AGAIN all socialists are not Marxists – even if they are all heavily influenced by Marx.”

              According to Marx’s writings, the names were interchangeable. Communism sounded more drastic, so Marx started to make socialism more inviting. Communism, as you know, is an economic system without government.

              “the ideologies were so close they were competing for the same followers.”

              In many respects, yes, however, there is more to it.

        4. “A student of history would know that Nazism was not a socialist system”
          ROFL

          “To say that Hitler understood the value of language would be an enormous understatement. Propaganda played a significant role in his rise to power. ”
          Do you understand that by your fallacious argument – Stalin was not a socialist, Mao was not Lenin was not, Castro was not.

          This is just a stupid permutation of the “socialism works if only we get the right leaders”
          As if it is pure accident that Mao, Lennin, Stalin, Castro, … all were socialist leaders ?

          “his primary—indeed, sole—focus was on achieving power whatever the cost ”
          Absolutely – as is true of pretty much all socialists.

          What is the difference between Hitler and Stalin, and Mao, and Castro and Pol Pot and … ?
          You can find racism and genocide with all of them. They all sought absolute power – that is exactly the type of people that socialism attracts.

          “Hitler became convinced that he needed to utilize the teetering democratic structures of the Weimar government to attain his goals.”
          And that would separate him from other socialists How ?

          “Over the following years the brothers Otto and Gregor Strasser did much to grow the party by tying Hitler’s racist nationalism to socialist rhetoric that appealed to the suffering lower middle classes.”
          Correct Nazi Socialism targets white collar and blue collar workers. While communists tend to target peasants Otherwise the idiology is the same.

          “Hitler had enlisted support from wealthy industrialists who sought to pursue avowedly anti-socialist policies.”
          Not True. While Hitler GOT support from outside the socialist Mileau – he did not solict them – they solicited him – and they thought they could control him and they were wrong.
          Ultimately this does not matter – except that your claim is historically inaccurate.
          In the midst of Lennin’s reign the communists reached out to esentially capitalists in Russia to grow their economy, But after consulidating power – that outreach proved short live and many of them ended up in the gulags.

          “Hitler allied himself with leaders of German conservative and nationalist movements”
          ROFL
          Are you completely clueless with regard to Hitlers actual prewar policies and programs ?
          They were socialist to the core.
          Absolutely Hitler was a nationalist – so was Franco and Musollini, and Peron, and Pol Pot, and Castro, and Chavez, and Maduro.

          “in January 1933 German President Paul von Hindenburg appointed him chancellor.”
          In the hope that Hitler could be contained. Which BTW was a reasonable hope at the time.
          But Hitler outmanueveured your so called German Right.

          “Hitler’s Third Reich had been born”
          Not at that moment – Hitler had still not fully consolidate power yet.

          “it was entirely fascist in character.”
          Correct – and Fascism is socialism

          “In April 1933 communists, socialists, democrats, and Jews were purged from the German civil service, and trade unions were outlawed the following month.”
          Everyone who was not a National Socialist.

          “That July Hitler banned all political parties other than his own, and prominent members of the German Communist Party and the Social Democratic Party were arrested and imprisoned in concentration camps.”
          Stalin, Mao, every major socialist leader ever did exactly the same thing.

          “Lest there be any remaining questions about the political character of the Nazi revolution, Hitler ordered the murder of Gregor Strasser, an act that was carried out on June 30, 1934, during the Night of the Long Knives. ”
          Correct – Hilter took out any threat to his power. The night of the long knives was about consolidating power – AGAIN – lopok at the purges of Lennin, Stalin, Mao.

          “Any remaining traces of socialist thought in the Nazi Party had been extinguished.”
          False – what was extinguished was any threat to Hitlers Power.

          “Do you want to revise your ridiculously shallow statement above?”
          I ask exactly that of YOU.

          Every single thing that you use to claim that Hitler and the Nazis were not socialist, is an attribute or conduct of every other major socialist leader EVER.

          Your history lesson provides NOTHING that distinguishes Hitler from Mao, or Lennin, or Stalin, or Castro, or Madoru. or Chavez, or …

          There are is one shocking thing about Hitler and the Nazi’s.
          And that is that this virulent blood thirsty murderous socialism had never before or since occured in a developed civilized western country.

        5. “Nazis rejected fundamental principles of socialism.”

          To make yourself appear scholarly, you gave lots of irrelevant details.

          While revealing a complete inability to think in essentials.

          The essence of socialism is the redistribution of wealth, the eradication of private property, and government control of industry. The Nazis erected a massive welfare program, made private property illegal, with the government planning and controlling the entire economy.

          “Do you want to revise your ridiculously” false statement?

      2. Hitler started by blaming the homosexuals and the homeless and the mentally deficient as threats.
        Trump has done the same.

        When one lays the same foundation expect a similar structure.

        1. ATS – only in your head. The hyper politicized leaders of he LGBTQ+ community – which is far left are anti-Trump. But Trump is not anti-homosexual. Several prominent members of his cabinet are gay. Some in key positions in his first term were.

          Trump is absolutely opposed to Woke Ideolgy and DEI.
          I know this is really hard for left wing nuts to comprehend – but not allowing pedo’s to correupt your children is not homophobic. Not allowing men in women
          s sports is not transphobic.

          Most of this country does not give a schiff who you love or what consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms.
          It is the other lunatic nonsense that the racial left is upto that the majority of americans oppose.

    2. Paul Broun compared Obama to Adolf Hitler and Karl Marx. Glenn Beck comparing Obama’s policies to Hitler’s and warned of totalitarianism. Rush Limbaugh compared Obama’s ACA to Nazi Germany.

      I guess this is what it is to be a douche moron. You see everything bad about people you hate and refuse to be aware that your team does it to.

    3. Because Hitler said it in speeches, Marxism and National Socialism MUST BE THE SAME.
      /s

      Wow, perhaps you should actually learn about Hitler’s Germany and crucial importance of propaganda.

      1. “Because Hitler said it in speeches, Marxism and National Socialism MUST BE THE SAME.”
        Word play games.

        First, the fascist economic system in all facist countries – but particularly italy and germany was SOCIALIST.
        This is not about WORDS but Facts.

        Absolutely Facism is NOT marxism. Marx posits socialism as a way point to utopian communism.
        Socialism is the END goal of fascism.
        Facists are anti-communists. But they are absolutely socialists.

        “perhaps you should actually learn about Hitler’s Germany”
        Certainly not from you – you are clueless about the Nazi economic system.
        You are clueless about the various Nazi social programs.

        When the Nazis SAY they are socialists and then construct and economy and social programs that are socialist – that is not mere propoganda.

        “crucial importance of propaganda.” Can you name a single socialist system in which propoganda was not of crucial importance ?

        You not only are clueless about Facism, Nazi’s but you are also clueless about actual socialism.

        You rant about what others purportedly do not know – yet your arguments are full from end to end with idiotic and false nonsense.

        You know very little about Facism, Nazi’s Nazi Germany and even less about socialism.

        You should not be lecturing anyone.

  11. AOC the biggest dummy in the whole Congress

    AOC: “We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was… His rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant, uneducated, and sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans.”

    1. I would love to see your evidence of Maoist Chinese references to Americans as fascists. Never seen that before.

      My guess is that you made this statement without actually confirming its accuracy, however.

          1. Yes, depending in the content of the discussion. Within that context it means they never don’t do the thing stated.

            Even then most people also can figure out from context that the person meant it as a generalization and not to be taken in literal mathematical terms.

            For example, “The whole city turned out for the ticker tape parade.” Doesn’t mean you can’t find someone who stayed home. It’s just descriptive.

  12. Turls, many people at newscorp may be talking about this, but out here on the ground we’re just concerned about the trump administration assault on the first amendment. Funny, since you’re someone that virtue signals through selective free speech channels, that you’re avoiding these actual free speech attacks…

    Then again, it’s really not that surprising.

    1. Stop your pearl clutching. No one is going to jail for exercising free speech. It was the left and the Biden Administration that created the Disinformation Governance Board which was an advisory board of the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS). it was supposed to to “protect” national security and combating misinformation, malinformation, and disinformation that threatens the security of the homeland. You conveniently forgot the attacks and silencing and deplatforming of Trump and conservative voices.

      1. Trump’s administration has literally jailed individuals for exercising free speech.

        Did you already forget Mahmoud Khalil?

        Rubio wants to revoke visas and deport non-citizens for speech and protest activity Rubio in his discretion deems hostile to US foreign policy.

        Where have you been?

        1. “Trump’s administration has literally jailed individuals for exercising free speech. Did you already forget Mahmoud Khalil?”

          Democrats literally say Khalil lying on immigration visa applications, beating his wife, and human trafficking is exercising Democrat Free Speech – not multiple serious felonies that violate the terms that every resident via holder is obligated to comply with.

    2. You have things backwards.
      Trump was elected because his platform “agenda 47” addresses the REAL concerns of real americans. Exit polls on election day showed that voters supported that agenda even MORE than they supported Trump and Republicans.

      Post election Democrats decided to tripple down on opposition to that agenda.

      Further your claimed assaults on free speech as both ludicrously hypocritical coming from the Obama/Biden crowd that was surveiling churches, arresting prolife protestors, censoring social media, and coercing banks to debank conservatives. If Trump has actually committed every violation of the first amendment you accuse him of – he would STILL be an amateur compared to you.

      Colbert is gone because he is not funny, and he is losing money hand over first.
      Kimmel has followed for the same reason – Worse he insulted half the country.
      If is somehow approiate that Hillary who called half the country a basket of deplorables would be backing Kimmel who accused half the country of murdering one of their own.

      Regardless – ABC had massive complaints from viewers AND two networks of local ABC distributors had told ABC/Disney to remove Kimmel or they would replace his show on their networks.
      That was the day before the FCC chair remarked on a Podcast that he would “look into” Kimmel ove the remarks.

      Disney/ABC demanded an on air appology from Kimmel – who doubled down with an appology that was purportedly even more defamatory of half the country than the original remarks.

      Where were you ranting about the first amendment when Fox pulled Tucker or Oreilly or Beck ?

      It is also odd that those of you on the left wrap yourselves in the first amendment over Kimmel.
      Where were you for Alex Jones ? Jones remarks were no more offensive than Kimmels – and Jones actually apologized when called out. Yet YOU took Jones through two kangaroo courts and got a $1B judgement.
      Disney/ABC had to address Kimmel’s remarks immediately – or it was highly likely that Erica Kirk and lots of others would be headed to court in deep red states with axes sharpened for revenge over jones.

      It is also odd that democrats – who created the FCC and who created the FCC rules that Carr sought to apply for these remarks for exactly this purpose – and who used them in the past to shutdown conservative broadcaster are now crying foul.

      Was the possibility of FCC action a factor ? Possibly. Was the possibility of delaying a merger a factor ? Possibly. Was Kimmels abysmal performance, high cost, arrogant refusal to appologize for remarks that were factually Wrong and that he knew or should have known at that time, and that defamed and caused pain to both specific individuals and a large class of americans and therefore subject ABC to a MASSIVE defamation and injury lawsuit a factor – absolutely.

      “Alas Alas for you
      Lawyers and Pharisees
      Hypocrites that you be”

      The left has no standards except double standards.

      Regardless Kimmel is suspended indefinitely because of his own failures.
      His failure to make money.
      His failure to be funny.
      His arrogance.
      his willingness to insult half the country.
      Either he actually beleives the lie he told
      or he is one of the worst possible hucksters.

      The entire Kirk assassination is hitting the left very hard.
      Not just because one of your own committed a premeditated political assassination intended to SILENCE Kirk and his message.

      But even more because of YOUR response.

      Kudos to the FEW on the left like Sen. Fetterman and Chenk Uigar who have come out against this.

      But the rest of you have shown the country who you are.
      You have Celebrated Kirks assassination.

      You have engaged in weird and absurd tinfoil hat conspiracy theories to evade blame.

      It is really odd that the same people who are glad that Kirk was murdered are simultaneously trying to claim that followers of right wing Nick Fuentes murdered him.

      You stupidly jumped the gun. Deliberately Misinterpreting the early clues to try to cast blame on others.

      In a criminal court that is called “consciousness of guilt”

      ABC and Disney “did the right thing” – hopefully for the right reasons.
      The first amendment is not a guarantee that you are free to speak to millions on a prominent talk show every night.

      Myriads of people have been fired by networks to go on to success.
      Kimmel can like Beck, Carlson, ORiely, or Kelly go out and create her own platform and suceed beyond what they did on the nets.

      That is if he actually has any talent.

      No one has silenced Kimmel.

      1. Colbert averages upwards of 2 million viewers a night. Kimmel 1.77 million. Both of these are roughly half the viewers they once had. These are both profitable numbers though…, they pay the bills plus some, which you’d know if you pulled your head out of your ass and did any research rather than just shared your ignorance. Just because network TV is shrinking, it doesn’t mean it’s not still profitable.

        The benching of Colbert and Kimmel were sacrificial peace offerings to get trump’s okay on merger plans for their bosses. If Colbert and Kimmel weren’t still profitable they would’ve been gone long ago. What you’re completely ignoring due to your unmitigated idiocy re the O Reilly and Beck dismissals is that they both had huge advertiser backlash, while Colbert and Kimmel do not.

        Trump hates being made fun of and his okay is required to make mergers possible. Trump is willing to put the first amendment in the cross hairs to jerk off his own ego. End of story. He’s functioning like a mobster, which I suppose explains his actions. Your cretinistic gullibility is completely on you however and is symptomatic of someone who took a slam to the head and never recovered.

        1. Colbert was bring in 40M/year BEFORE his ratings tanked.
          His show costs $100/yr.

          No he was NOT making money. nor was Kimmel.

          Can Network TV shrink and remain profitable – theoretically.
          But you have never had to run a business if you beleive that is easy.
          If your revenues drop by 50% – you must cut expenses by 50% and you must do so FAST.
          Salaries do not drop easily – the key people on these shows have very large multi-year mutlimillion dollar contracts. The cost of studios and office spaces is very difficult to cut.

          I can not tell you exactly what will happen with Network TV.
          But I can tell you somethings that will NOT happen.
          it will NOT recover back to where it was.
          it is unlikely that all networks will survive.
          It is likely most will be sold off at bargain prices to investors that are going to slash and burn costs.

          Colbert and Kimmel are NOT the only ones with heads on the block.
          People you know, and lots of people you do not know will be losing their jobs.

          While Fox is doing far better than the rest of the MSM – even fox is facing problems.
          People are moving away from the MSM.

          You can only survive selling buggy whips so long.

      2. Regardless – ABC had massive complaints from viewers AND two networks of local ABC distributors had told ABC/Disney to remove Kimmel or they would replace his show on their networks.“

        That’s not true. Making excuses already?

        There were no “massive complaints from viewers.”

        Nothing Kimmel said was controversial, even ABC executives acknowledged that. Kimmel’s monologue did not imply or say anything about MAGA being at fault for Charlie Kirk’s murder.

        The FCC explicitly threatened Nextar about Kimmel’s comments and implied their merger was in jeopardy if they didn’t do something about it. It’s precisely the thing you griped and complained was an attack on free speech and censorship when Biden was in office. Now it’s totally acceptable? Come on, the hypocrisy is so thick you can see it on conservatives’ faces when they deny it.

        “The entire Kirk assassination is hitting the left very hard.
        Not just because one of your own committed a premeditated political assassination intended to SILENCE Kirk and his message.”

        The left had nothing to do with it. It’s the right that was hit hard over Kirk’s assassination. Now they are clutching their pearls whenever there is any criticism, mockery, or even celebration of his death, and demand severe punishment, even the government is joining in on the punishment bandwagon which is illegal and according to all Republicans, unconstitutional.

        The sheer hypocrisy of the right and the sudden 180 on their views of government censorship and attacks on free speech is astounding.

        “The left has no standards except double standards.”

        You keep conflating what the right is doing with the left. The left has been condemning the killing of Kirk from day one. The right has been wailing and moaning about the left being guilty of murder and calling for revenge and ratcheting up the violent rhetoric and accusations against the left. Nobody on the right except a few has been calling for lowering the temperature on the rhetoric. President Trump has made no calls to calm down or unify the nation. He’s been raising the rage rhetoric and accusing the left without evidence.

        Citing Jones, O’Reilly, and Tucker Carlspon as equivalent examples against Kimmel’s suspension is outright stupid. Jones was found guilty of defamation which is NOT free speech. That was after years of litigation. O’Reilly got booted because of sexual harassment claims he could not defend against. Tucker Carlson was fired because he was peddling false claims on Fox News about Dominion and subsequent emails and texts proved he was indeed lying. What exactly did Kimmel say that was so egregious to MAGA that they needed to have him suspended? Notably, none, not a single MAGA conservative you quote exactly what he said that is so offensive.

        Republicans and MAGA zealots are clutching their pearls into white-knuckle fists of rage at anything even hinting at offense over Charlie Kirk’s murder. It’s mass hysteria comparable to the Red Scare of the 1950s. Pure paranoia and offense at the idea that there are some people out there mocking his death or celebrating it. That didn’t seem to be the case for Fox News talking heads and MAGA influencers when Nancy Pelosi’s husband was brutally attacked with a hammer.

        “You stupidly jumped the gun. Deliberately Misinterpreting the early clues to try to cast blame on others.‘

        Again, you seem to confuse what the right has been doing the minute Charlie Krik was killed. Immediately the assumptions and speculation, and conjecture started flying. From false claims about what was inscribed on bullet casings to claims of the shooter being left-wing. You joined in on that speculation and insinuation. Don’t pretend you were also repeating the rumors and false assertions without waiting for the facts to come out.

        “No one has silenced Kimmel.”

        Trump silenced Kimmel. He threatened just days ago on his social media posts. The FCC followed through on those threats and now that we have near direct evidence of government coercion and threats to censor you start making excuses and lies about what is really going on. That is the level of hypocrisy and disingenuousness that has come to define conservatives.

        Professor Turley’s lack of condemnation and indignation at Trump’s blatant censorship and use of blackmail to force others to silence dissent should be raising a bunch of red flags. Turley is afraid to criticize Trump and his administration the same way he did with Biden. Because he knows he will face the same rage and calls to punish him for bucking the authoritarianism of Trump and his followers. We have already seen how little it takes to incur the wrath of pearl-clutching MAGA if you even dare think about criticising Trump or Mocking and pointing out that Charlie Kirk was no saint, but an attention-seeking racist and a bigot. At least he practiced what he preached. Free Speech. Trump? He hates it with a passion if it’s about mocking him or criticizing him.

        1. “That’s not true.”
          It is well documented – and Nextar and Sinclair have said so publicly.

          “There were no “massive complaints from viewers.””
          only in your head.

          “Nothing Kimmel said was controversial, even ABC executives acknowledged that. Kimmel’s monologue did not imply or say anything about MAGA being at fault for Charlie Kirk’s murder.”
          The transcript is available – as is the video on youtube.
          Kimmel blamed Kirks shooting on MAGA.

          “The FCC explicitly threatened Nextar about Kimmel’s comments”
          ROFL – Nextar and sinclar contacted Iger at Disney THAT NIGHT.
          the FCC said nothing until well into the following day and even that was relatively tame

          “implied their merger was in jeopardy if they didn’t do something about it.”
          You BELEIVE that – lots of left wing nuts say that.
          But there is no actual evidence of any threat by anyone,
          AND Nextar, Sinclair and even Iger at Disney acted BEFORE FCC’s Carr said a word.

          “It’s precisely the thing you griped and complained was an attack on free speech and censorship when Biden was in office. ”
          No Biden ACTUALLY censored people.
          “Now it’s totally acceptable?”
          I have been trying to get rid of the FCC my entire life.
          I will be happy to join you and get rid of them.
          I am fully with Ted Cruz – FCC char Carr should not have said ANYTHING.
          But the supreme court has ruled more than 30 years ago that not only could Carr say what he did, but he could actually DO what you think Carr might have done.
          The laws that YOU passed would allow the FCC to suspend ABC’s license for Kimmels remarks.
          And the FCC has done so in the past.

          This was published in 1976 and details MASSIVE abuses at the FCC by the Johnson adminsitration that SCOTUS found constitutional
          https://www.amazon.com/good-guys-bad-first-amendment/dp/0394497252

          There was even more such nonsense in the clinton administration.

          “The left had nothing to do with it.”
          ROFL
          X – this gets worse for the left every day

          “It’s the right that was hit hard over Kirk’s assassination.”
          Absolutely – the last political assassination we have seen in the US like this was MLK.

          “Now they are clutching their pearls whenever there is any criticism, mockery, or even celebration of his death”
          Yup, De mortuis nil nisi bonum
          Your violating an ancient moral code.

          “even the government is joining in on the punishment bandwagon”
          How so ? Saying someone should be fired is NOT using FORCE or government.

          “The left has been condemning the killing of Kirk from day one.”
          Those few on the left who are doing so deserve a great deal of credit.
          But the majority of the left are celebrating.

          “The right has been wailing and moaning about the left being guilty of murder”
          Tyler Robinson is clearly on the far left and clearly guilty of Murder.
          Are YOU ? No. But you are guilty of lying about him, of trying to make excuses
          and of egregiously bad conduct concerning this issue.
          Everything you have said is free speech. You can not go to jail for it.
          You can not be censored by govenrment for it.
          But you can be shunned by moral people everywhere.
          You can be shamed as the vile person you have shown yourself to be.

          “calling for revenge”
          Like firing people who are celebrating Kirks assassination.
          Like arresting people who desecrate memorials to kirk.

          “ratcheting up the violent rhetoric and accusations against the left.”
          I have seen little of that – but even if there was alot – SO WHAT ?

          “Nobody on the right except a few has been calling for lowering the temperature on the rhetoric.”
          False and
          I DO NOT CARE.

          you rioted accross the country when a drug adict caught passing counterfiet 20’s died afer eating his stash.
          You can STFU and listen while those angry over a murder committed ny a left wing nut speak their mind.

          “President Trump has made no calls to calm down or unify the nation.”
          He has called on everyone to condemn this.

          “He’s been raising the rage rhetoric”
          He has been PROPERLY condemning those who celebrate a political assassination
          and try to blame it on the innocent.

          “accusing the left without evidence.”
          ROFL

          “Citing Jones, O’Reilly, and Tucker Carlspon as equivalent examples against Kimmel’s suspension is outright stupid.”
          Nope.

          “Jones was found guilty of defamation”
          Correct – and Kimmel has done almost EXACTLY what resulted in a $1B verdict
          There is a reason that Kimmel was suspended indefinitely – and it had nothing to do with the FCC.
          If ABC/Disnet did not act – that would have been a failure to mitigate damages.
          Kimmel should have done as Iger demanded and appologized.
          That would have dramatically reduced the odds of a lawsuit and dramatically reduced the damages.

          OReilly and Carlson – were fired because advertisers threatened to pull out.
          But even by YOUR argument – KImmel said egregiously and obviously false thing

          “What exactly did Kimmel say”
          Check Youtube – there are many videos of Kimmels remarks.
          Megan Kelley has an excellent peice that is short and almost entirely both Kimmels remarks and a very damning video of him much much earlier saying that every single thing he says gets thoroughly fact checked before it is said on the air.
          In a defamation trial the plantiffs will play that over and over on loop.

          “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who m***dered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them”
          Here is ONE quote. There are more.
          At the time Kimmel made his remarks – Robinson’s mother had publicly said that he had gone to the left several years earlier, and Robeinsons texts making clear that he was on the left and that is why he murdered Kirk were also public.

          Kimmel Either did not fact check – or lied.
          But worse, he refused to apologize or retract and OBIOUSLY false and defamatory statement.
          This is very nearly exactly what got Jones in trouble.

          “Republicans and MAGA zealots are clutching their pearls into white-knuckle fists of rage at anything even hinting at offense over Charlie Kirk’s murder.”
          Aside from the loaded stupid rhetoric – absolutely – LOTS of people are Mad As h311 and not going to take it any more – and they are made at YOU.

          “offense at the idea that there are some people out there mocking his death or celebrating it.”
          It is not an idea – lots of people on the left are doing exactly that.
          Repugnant vile people who YOU are making excuses for.

          “That didn’t seem to be the case for Fox News talking heads and MAGA influencers when Nancy Pelosi’s husband was brutally attacked with a hammer.”
          Pelosi’s husband was not murdered. He was not even hurt badly, and he was attacked by a burnt out left wing nut druggy.
          Regardless almost no one celebrated the violence. We did attack the left for trying to make political hay out and as you always do – and as Kimmel did – lying to claim that a left wing nut was actually on the right.

          “Again, you seem to confuse what the right has been doing the minute Charlie Krik was killed. Immediately the assumptions and speculation, and conjecture started flying. ”
          As is always the case – we had all kinds of false speculation about the guy who attacked Pelosi too.

          “From false claims about what was inscribed on bullet casings”
          Every claim by anyone on the right has so far proved true.
          We KNOW exactly what was on the bullet casings.
          The initial press leaks were later confirmed publicly by law enforcement.

          “to claims of the shooter being left-wing. ”
          Which he was.

          “You joined in on that speculation and insinuation.”
          Correct – and I was wrong about ONE thing – Robinson does not appear to be a paranoid Schitzophrenic.
          Every single other probabalistic claim I made proved correct.

          “Don’t pretend you were also repeating the rumors and false assertions without waiting for the facts to come out.”
          I did NOT repeat rumors and false assertions.
          The bullet casings did say exactly what the leaks say they did.
          Tyler Robinson is a left wing nut.
          He does NOT appear to be mentally disturbed – so long as you do not call far left a mental health issue – that I was wrong about.
          While I did not repeat the speculation that there was a Trans element to this – that leaked information ALSO proved true.
          In fact nearly every claim made by those on the right relatively quickly was proven TRUE.

          Which is another part of what is wrong with Kimmel’s remarks – they were NEVER Wise, They were always false. But long before he said them they were PROVEN false.

          It is Kimmel that did what you claim those on the right did.

          “Trump silenced Kimmel.”
          Nope – Kimmel remains perfectly free to speak.
          He just no longer has the bull horn of a late night show – that he never hard a right to and lost on his own by lying egregiously.

          “He threatened just days ago on his social media posts.”
          You have the timing ALL screwed up.
          Kimmel Lied on TV.
          Within hours calls were pouring in to Disney, Sinclair and Nextar.
          Sinclair and Nextar told Iger they would not air future Kimmel shows if something was not done. Iger called Kimmel in and told him to apologize. Kimmel idiotically proposed to double down. Kimmel left and went directly to his lawyers – likely because Iger had already told him that he was suspended – but that did not make the press immediately.

          FCC Carr then on a podcast was asked about Kimmel’s remarks and said that the FCC would look into them. THEN Trump said Kimmel should be fired.

          “The FCC followed through on those threats”
          No they did not – the FCC has not had the time to do anything. I doubt Carr met with anyone.

          Next While the laws that allow Carr to sanction ABC for Kimmels remarks Ought to be unconstitutional – SCOTUS long ago said they are not.

          Whether you like it or not – the FCC – using power the LEFT gave it could remove Kimmel from the air or even revoke ABC’s license or thwart the merger. All of that is perfectly legal.
          It shouldn;t be – but it is. YOU made that so. Further Democrat presidents, Johnson Clinton, Obama and Biden HAVE used that FCC power in precisely the same way that you claim Carr threatened – Carr only threatened to look into it.
          Trump did not direct Carr – but he is constitutionally free to do so – atleast according to existing precidents. I think those precidents are WRONG, but we have to live with the law as it is not as we wish it was. I fully agree with Ted Cruz – republcians should NOT behave like Democrats have done for decades.

          But YOU do not get to say that. Democrats who have CONSTANTLY demanded that federal agencies – including specificallyu the FCC F$%K with conservatives do not get to rant because a Republican FCC chair THOUGHT about doing what democrats have actually done repeatedly.
          And if you want evidence – I provided you with a link to “the good, the bad and the first amendment” – though I beleive Caroline Kennedy has a chapter covering some of it in her book on the constitution

          “now that we have near direct evidence of government coercion and threats to censor”
          But you do not have that.
          You have FCC chair car being asked and saying he would look into it.
          And Trump saying that Kimmel should be fired.
          You have no actually inappropriate threats.
          Kimmel should be fired – and essentially was.
          The actual evidence is that he was likely fully fired before Carr uttered a word.

          Does the FCC have the power to remove Kimmel or ABC from the air – yes – Power you gave it.
          For remarks like Kimmels – Yes.
          Can the FCC stop or delay mergers over remarks like this – Yes.
          Have then done so many times in the past – Yes. Always with democrat presidents and targeting conservatives.

          Should that happen – NO!
          Should SCOTUS have fond that unconstitutional – yes.
          But they did not.

          Regardless, the left has demanded exactly this – during both the biden and Obama administrations – and on occasion gotten it.
          So You have no leg to stand on.

          ” you start making excuses and lies about what is really going on. ”
          If you are going to accuse me of lying – then you need to be specific.
          Because I WILL prove you Wrong – making YOU the liar – but we all know that.
          If you are not going to be specific – then you are defacto the liar.

          “That is the level of hypocrisy and disingenuousness that has come to define conservatives.”
          How so ?

          “Trump’s blatant censorship”
          What censorship ?
          Calling for someone to be fired for lying is not censorship.

          “use of blackmail to force others to silence dissent”
          You ranted about alleged specualtion regarding Robison – all of which was not specualtion and proved true. And then here you are speculating STUPIDLY – out the whazoo.

          Did the FCC even meet ? Did Trump talk to FCC Carr ? Did FCC Carr Talk top Disney ?

          No! All these supposed threats were left wing nut speculation that you magically transformed into reality.

          The FCC could revoke ABC’s OTA license over this – but there is no evidence than anyone outside the left mentioned that – a process that likely would take years.

          The FCC could stall the merger – but again that is something that take time.

          Regardless there was no FCC meeting on this, no FCC communication to anyone on this.
          Just a noncommital remark by FCC commissioner Carr on a podcast about somethingt that the FCC can legally and constitutionally do and has done to conservatives in the past.

          So in the end you have speculation that ABC was threatened – because left wing nuts speculated that ABC could be threatened, but you have no actual threat.
          Trump publicly saying Kimmel should be fired – something that Obviously should be done,
          is not a threat.

          Typical left wing nut words games.

          “the same way he did with Biden.”
          Biden took ACTION to censor people.
          Trump has – according to you – threatened people, but non-threats.

          “We have already seen how little it takes to incur the wrath of pearl-clutching MAGA”
          Absolutely – MAGA assassinates those who disagree with them.
          OOPS – sorry that is left wing nuts.
          Again – where are the riots, where is the arson, where is the molatov cocktails, where is the looting. Where are all the things that we get on a daily basis from angry left wing nuts.

          Turley shoudl be quaking in his boots – because left wing nuts like YOU are violent.
          he has nothing to fear from pissing off MAGA.

          You assassinated a Major MAGA leader – and no riots.
          You should be affraid – but not of violence, you should be affriad that you are exposing who you are to the entire world.

          “if you even dare think about criticising Trump or Mocking and pointing out that Charlie Kirk was no saint, but an attention-seeking racist and a bigot.”
          What ?What is the “threat” ? that you will be censored ? Left wing nuts are saying these lies over and over and not getting censored.

          That some Left wing nut college will fire you – because you have shown yourself to be a repugnant human being ?

        2. BTW Trump does not “hate free speech” – when you mock him – he mocks you back.
          That is how free speech works.

          You mock people all the time – and I mock you back.
          You are a clueless liar and left wing nut.

      3. Jimmy Kimmel’s annual salary for “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” is estimated to be between $15 million and $16 million.
        Kimmel’s unemployment isn’t hurting him. Be real, It’s not like the common man loosing their job.
        All the Networks are under the gun to cut the Payroll, so they let the personnel hang themselves. The Show is Over.
        Better going out now before the Hatchet Man cometh.

    3. John Kerry opinion….
      OOPS
      Democrat John Kerry, too. He actually lamented that the 1st Amendment was in the way of the Democrats controlling speech. Scary people

      Another power hungry lib…

    4. “but out here on the ground we’re just concerned about the trump administration assault on the first amendment.”
      Yes, that would be a tiny fraction of the far left is concerned that Trump is hinting at doing what Democratic presidents like Johnson, Clinton, Obama, and Biden have actually done and weaponized the FCC against political enemies.

      I will be happy to wipe the FCC off the face of the earth.
      I will be happy to agree that FCC chair Carrs remarks were stupid.
      But Carr pondered acting in ways that every democratic president since Johnson has actually done, and that the Supreme Court of the United States has already unfortunately said was leal and constitutional.

      And almost no one on the planet has the slightest interest in the loony rants about free speech offered by Idiots like you who ranted that hate speech is not protected by the first amendment – if that is the case – then these left wing nuts should not merely be fired – they should be incarcerated.

      Regardless, the hypocracy on the left on issues of free speech is staggering beyond belief.

      The FACT is that NO ONE is threatening your right to free speech.
      The Government is NOT using FORCE – such as they did under Obama and Biden to censor you or anyone else. They are NOT censoring your social media. They are not debanking you. They are not surveiling you. All things YOU had no problem with not that long ago.

      As to nonsense regarding Kimmel – what exactly do you think will happen when some left wing nut tanks their ratings, is losing money hand over fist for their network ans decides to go on the air to make absolutely False remarks that defame over 100 million people?
      Do you think that his Bosses are going to say – PLEASE give us MORE ?
      Within HOURS of Kimmels remarks Nextar and Sinclair had told Disney that Kimmels show would not be carried by their networks the next day if he did not apologize.
      Nextar and Sinclair did this because THEIR audiences had bombarded them with complaints.
      Because THEY did not want to be the Next Anheiser Bush.
      Disney’s Iger brought Kimmel in and told him to appologize.
      Kimmel offer an “apology” that was just doubling down on the false and defamatory remarks he had made. Iger then suspended Kimmel.

      Significant portions of this happened before FCC’s Carr said a word.
      Aside from the rising anger that Kimmel had provoked – was the separate issue that Kimmels remarks could easily (and still could) trigger a massive lawsuit – much like the one that resulted in the Billion dollar judgement against Alex Jones.

      Both Jones and Kimmel made the same stupid mistake
      De mortuis nil nisi bonum
      Do not speak ill of the dead.

      This assassination has angered a very large portion of the country
      And they are burning with anger at left wing nuts like YOU.

      If you and Kimmel and the rest of your ilk had any brains you would keep your heads down and your mouths shut for a while.
      But you have been far too stupid to do that.
      You like bear baiting.
      Well you pissed off the bear.

      The good news for you – is that the people you pissed of are NOT like you.
      They are PROBABLY not going to respond by assassinating anyone.

      Though I would note that you tried to assassinate Kavanaugh.
      Trump twice, and you succeeded in assassinating Kirk.
      So you MIGHT have unhinged someone enough to behave like you.
      But I hope not.

      So far the right has not burned down cities over Kirks assassination – as YOU did.
      They have not rioted and looted – as you did.
      But that does not mean they are not full of righteous anger.

      So STFU if you are not a moron.

      There have been absolutely no consequences for your bad speech for a long time.
      Now you are facing a TINY bit of what you have done to others for years.

      If you did not want fired – do not say stupid things.
      Kimmel will do fine. My bet is his contract gets bought out, and he was not likely to get renewed with his numbers anyway.
      He can Join Tucker in New Media – we will see if he manages to do better than Don Lemon.
      Or he can go to only fans where he belongs.

      Regardless, he has NOT lost his right to free speech.
      Just the bullhorn that was never his.

  13. We homeschooled our children. The number one question we were asked when people found out was, “What about their socialization?” … As long as people think the purpose for schools is socialization, education is going to continue to suffer and decline.

    The accusation of Fascism is the way Hillary and other socialists on the left have demonized anyone who disagrees with them since the early 90’s and many are repeating it. Part of the problem is, most of those who parrot the accusation that Trump is a Fascist, can’t define what a Fascist is. A good start would be to describe the external behavior of the two most noted “Fascists” of the 20th century.

    Mussolini had his “black shirts” and Hitler had his “brown shirts”. Both groups used violence to harass those who disagreed with them. I can’t help but think of those courageously brave kids with ski masks.., you know the ones who harass people daring to attend a speaking event of someone they disagree with.., then they meet up afterwards to share war stories of how they ganged up on and beat up someone heading to the event. The irony is they call themselves “anti Fascists”!?!?

    Fascists seek to increase government efficiency by vesting all power in a single leader. It is said a key feature is their emphasis on nationalism. George Washington pointed out that all nations do what is in their own best interests and rightly so. He had no self delusions that the King of France aided the colonies in the Revolutionary War because the King believed in liberty and rule by the people. 😂 France and Spain were getting ready to go to war against England and having England tied up with a Revolution at that time was in their best interest. The Fascist view of nationalism emphasizes that the state is less for the people, but rather the people are for the state, and the increased glory of the state through military conquest of inferior peoples. Fascists under Mussolini and Hitler were a form of socialists. They actively denounced capitalism and individualism. Sure, private ownership of industry was allowed.., as long as the owners did what they were told.

    Fascists sought to control the people by the removal of misleading information (removal of free speech), control of the media and state sponsored propaganda. (How much false information about Covid was shoveled on us from the government?) Joseph Goebbels stated he could get the people to believe anything if he could repeat it enough. He would be very proud of his disciples in our times. (And BTW, anyone who doesn’t know who Joseph Goebbels was, shouldn’t be parroting big words like “Fascist”.) False information is always a problem, but the removal of free speech is worse! The removal of free speech is fundamental to tyranny! Both Germany and the Soviet Union had their secret police that would hunt out and arrest anyone who spoke out against the state.

    1. “Fascists sought to control the people by the removal of misleading information (removal of free speech), control of the media and state sponsored propaganda.”

      That is what Trump is doing now.

      Trump is defining what is misleading information and removing it. Climate change data, destroying weather satellites because they provide information, silencing tv shows, reporters, etc. Fox News has been a de facto state propaganda for Republicans for years. He hires cabinet members who were Fox News commentators.

      1. “That is what Trump is doing now.”

        No, the left losing its voice – because no one is listening is your own fault.

        “Trump is defining what is misleading information and removing it.”
        Nope.

        “Climate change data”
        Look arround you – 40 years of histrionic warmist predictions and not one has come true.
        None of this has any place INSIDE government.
        If you wish to lie to people about the climate – use your own money to do so – Not mine.

        ” silencing tv shows, reporters,”
        You can expect to see lots more TV shows canceled reporters dropped, and networks fail or shrink.
        To the extent this has anything to do with trump it is because viewers are fed up with your lies about him and everyone else you hate.

        Trump’s election in 2016 gave network TV a repreive – they were losing ground to insurgent new media, but 4 years of constantly attacking Trump and shilling antitrump hoaxes gave them a repreive. Biden’s presidency undercut the MSM Viewers did not want to here left wing nuts fawning over Biden. Trump’s election in 2024 is the last straw. People have learned that the MSM lied to them constantly during Trumps first term. Unlike 2017 when ratings rose after Trump’s election – MSM ratings have dropped even further – Kimmel lost 2/3 of his already weak audience in the past 9 months – as did Colbert.

        MSM networks MUST increase their ratings, find a model to survive on lower ratings, or die.
        That has nothing to do with Trump.

        You attack Fox, yet while doing much better than the rest of MSM – and benefiting from the lack of faith people have in the rest of the MSM – Fox too is not immune to the decline in interest in the MSM. Fox in some form is likely to survive – because it has not lied so egregiously to its audience as the rest of the MSM,

        It is still true that the MSM – including Fox is waning. Fox may end up as one of the survivors – but it will still just be a big fish in a much smaller pond.

        None of the above has anything to do with Trump.

        “Fox News has been a de facto state propaganda for Republicans for years. He hires cabinet members who were Fox News commentators.”
        Fox news revenue comes from advertisers not govenrment.
        Just like ABC, NBC, CBS.
        There is no improper entanglement between Fox and the government.
        and it is not like CNN and MSDNC have not been the official propoganda of the democrats.
        Further the rest of the MSM is the sinecure where unemployed democrat cabinet officials go for work.

        That is all just called the free market.

        Your not entitled to have the entire media parrot whatever you wish.

        The FCC is a minor factor in the media – and I will be happy to join you in abolishing the FCC (and FTC) as well as all the idiotic rules that YOU put in place over the years that can now be used by Republicans.

        But in the end the MSM is answerable to consumers. And their votes are in.
        Colbert is out, Kimmel is out. They are not funny, they are not interesting.
        That is not my view – that is the truth of their ratings.

        If Kimmel or Colbert had the ratings of Gutfeld – the networks would defend them to the hilt.

        I would further note – this is not the end of firings. The MSM does not have the revenue and the ratings to sustain all the left wing networks and all the left wing hosts and shows.
        There will be more and more and more cuts – until the MSM figures out how to increase revenues OR decrease costs. My suspicion is a couple of networks either go bankrupt of shrink to next to nothing.

        But the era of left wing control of the media is over.

        Because the people have spoken.

        As you are fixated on Fox – Fox is likely to survive. But even Fox is likely to have to downsize.
        The era of the big networks is over.

      2. if not
        destroying weather satellites because they provide information,
        ________________________________
        Where did you get this info?
        I’m quite sure you know nothing about satellites. or how they are controlled.
        You never destroy anything in space. Unless something goes wrong.
        You’re comment is a total lie.

    2. So to summarize, you note these points:

      (1) Centralized control with executive leader
      (2) Control of information (erosion of free speech)
      (3) Violence to harass opponents.

      Trump’s entire term has been characterized by taking the unilateral theory of the executive to its limits. More executive orders than any other president at this point. Ignoring court orders, firing employees in quasi-legislative agencies, ignoring statutes limiting executive power, the list goes on.

      Trump literally this week threaten to revoke media licenses if media does not self censor anti Trump speech.

      https://www.axios.com/2022/05/02/trump-call-violence-presidency

      The above link from 2022 lists times Trump threatened to use violence to suppress protests. Trump has this term deployed the military on numerous occasions to do just that. And his efforts to classify antifa (which is an ideology not an organized group) as a terrorist organization and his use of the military against organized drug cartels are eerily reminiscent of Mussolini’s tactics against the Mafia in the 1920s.

      As your name suggests, history repeats.

      1. “So to summarize, you note these points:

        (1) Centralized control with executive leader
        (2) Control of information (erosion of free speech)
        (3) Violence to harass opponents.”

        Litterally the modern tenants of the democratic party.

        “Trump’s entire term has been characterized by taking the unilateral theory of the executive to its limits.”
        It is called the unitary executive – and it is the very first line of Article II of the constitution.

        It means that ALL executive functions of the US govenrment are the domain of the president – except where explicitly specified elsewhere in the constitution.

        That is limited to executive power – the president has no judicial power and very very little legislative power.

        Even left wing nuts seem to grasp that with the exception of the approval of the senate as required for some positions the president can otherwise hire as he please.
        The power to hire IS the power to fire.
        The courts long ago established that the advice and consent clause required senate approval to appoint, but NOT to remove.

        I would further note that both Obama and Biden fired so called “independent”members of the executive and won at SCOTUS.

        There is nothing Trump is doing that prior presidents – including Obama and Biden did not do.
        At the most he is doing so on a larger scale that is all.

        Current ICE deportations are running slightly less than double those of Obama.
        What is actually different is almost no illegal immigrants are getting into the US.
        So net illegal immigration under Trump is negative while under Obama is was positive and under Biden it was gargantuanly positive

        Regardless, there is nothing lawless or unconsitutional involve.
        I would further note – that BEFORE Trump SCOTUS and US law required minimal due process – little more than establishing you are in the US illegally, and that you are the person you are alleged to be. This should not ne in the slightest surprising.
        Due process requirements vary with the rights being infringed upon, and the seriousness of the offense. You get very little due process for a parking ticket. While a capital death penalty case requires the greatest due process as a life is being taken.
        Being sent home, does NOT entitle you to much due process – there is no right being violated.

        I find it absolutely hillarious that the very people who were mass censoring people on social media. Who had government paying NGO’s to identify consrvatives to censor, that were running whole departments in the government identifying people to censor, that were coiercing banks to debank conservatives. That sent the FBI out after churches and pro life protestors, that sent the FBI out after nearly every conservative organization in the country
        That ranted for decades that hate speech – speech you do not liek was not protected by the first amendment are now trying to wrap yourselves in the first amendment and play the victim.
        Kimmel was fired because he was losing he network money, and because he said something on the air that would likely have subject them to a $1B alex jones type massive lawsuit, and because when he was asked to appologize on air instead lied even more.
        If you want to get rid of the FCC and FTC and other government agencies that could strong arm free market actors – I am 100% with you.
        But no one is buying the weeping and gnashing of teeth because Trump MIGHT have used YOUR laws to do to YOU a tiny bit of what you have done to others.

        Kimmel and others are being fired – because they have publicly proven themselves to be repulsive human beings.

        The people coming after you with pitchforks are NOT brownshirts – though they certainly are people you have called brownshirts over and over.
        They are the ordinary people who you have gone out of your way to pi$$ over and pi$$ off.

        You should be breathing a sigh of relief that you are being “canceled” because the majority of people think you are revolting disgusting human beings rather than being assassinated – which is what YOU do.

        Read the remarks of Tyler Robinson regarding Charlie Kirk.
        That is EXACLTY how most americans feel about YOU.
        The difference is that We are choosing to have nothing to do with you.
        To stop watching your shows. To stop giving you our attention and money.
        You keep choosing violence.

        ” More executive orders than any other president at this point.”
        There is alot of mess that you have made that needs cleaned up.

        “Ignoring court orders”
        False.

        “firing employees in quasi-legislative agencies”
        There are no such agencies. There are only three branches to the federal govenrment – the executive, the legislative and the judicial. There is no quasi-legislative agency.
        Regardless, if congress creates an agency and places it in the executive branch the power to hire and fire its employees is constitutionally with the president.

        “ignoring statutes limiting executive power”
        If there were such statutes and they were constitutional – the only party with standing to challenge the president would be congress – and they have not.
        Congress has delegated a great deal of power that it should not have to the president.
        The courts should not have allowed that, but they did
        The left has been taking advantage of that for almost a century.
        All Trump is doing is proving that power given to the president to unconstitutionally advance left wing nut causes can also be used to terminate them.

        “Trump literally this week threaten to revoke media licenses if media does not self censor anti Trump speech.”
        ROFL
        The little boy who called Wolf is upset because now the wolf has come.
        Regardless, Kimmel did not engage in anti-Trump rhetoric – he accused half the country of murdering Kirk – the Half that had absolutely nothing to do with it.
        He did so Falsely and he either was KNOWINGLY false or Should have known his remarks were false. Kimmel is not some ill informed kid posting on social media, he has a multi-million dollars staff to assure that he does not make illegal and defamatory statements – and he did anyway.

        “The above link from 2022 lists times Trump threatened to use violence to suppress protests. ”
        Your protests are violent, it is the responsibility of the government to stop violence and to punish it.

        That is litterally the explicit social contract role of government.

        The president has absolutely no power to thwart truly non-violent protests.

        But we have all seen the video or protestors assaulting the police and ICE agents, burning things down, throwing rocks and concrete. firing fireworks – all things that did NOT occur at the capital on J6.

        YOU set J6 up as the standard measure of a violent protest that govenrment must use FORCE to put down – Every protest you engage in is more violent than J6
        You are once again – “hoist by your own petard”

        “Trump has this term deployed the military on numerous occasions to do just that.”
        No that would be the national Guard. The NG has by law a legitimate function in keeping the peace. Presidents for more than my lifetime have sent them to supress civil violence.
        Again this is not new.

        ” And his efforts to classify antifa (which is an ideology not an organized group) as a terrorist organization”
        If Antifa is not an organized group – then then classifying them as a terrorist organzation will accomplish nothing. The FBI can investigate organizations – it can not investigate ideologies even if it wanted.

        Regardless you are really trying to defend Antifa ?

        “his use of the military against organized drug cartels”
        Really ? You want to defend Drug cartels ?

        The US has sent the military in to assist in the fight against drug cartels, throughout my entire life.
        They have done so overtly and they have done so covertly.
        GHWB invaded a sovereign country to take down a drug cartel leader who was also president.

        This bothers you ?

    3. Trump’s America should be thought of as on the cusp of competitive authoritarianism, which is a diluted cousin of 20th century fascism.

      Main features:
      – Weaponizing the state to target political opponents and critical voices. –> see., Jimmy Kimmel
      – Undermining democratic reforms through persistent attacks on the media, judiciary, and electoral integrity. –> so many examples, support for gerrymandering, fake elector scheme, attacks on mail-in ballot voting, openly attacking judges and blatantly ignoring court orders.
      – Increasing the cost of opposition – a fear of government retaliation for speaking out publicly against the administration has spread through society. This includes the possibility of legal or financial harassment for critics. —> e.g., Trump’s attack on law firms; tariffs require corporate pandering to receive exemptions;
      – semi-loyal accomplices – political figures who tolerate or enable authoritarian behavior for partisan gain. Pretty much the entire traditional GOP, who have given up standard conservative/libertarian policies for MAGA statism.

      Better comparisons for Trump’s tilt to competitive authoritarianism than Mussolini’s Italy include:
      – Slobodan Milosevic’s Serbia
      – Kuchma’s Ukraine
      – Fujimori’s Peru
      – Venezuela under Chavez.

      1. “Trump’s America should be thought of as on the cusp of competitive authoritarianism, which is a diluted cousin of 20th century fascism.”

        It’s apparent you don’t know what that word ‘fascism’ means to people who don’t come here from the Democrat Borg.

        How did you miss the pure police state fascism of Obama/Biden, before Trump became your excuse, turning America’s DoJ and FBI into their personal (and Democrat) STASI, to investigate, ruin, and jail any American in and out of politics who opposed their Great Leap Forward?

  14. Jimmy Kimmel has not been fired. However, as is standard practice for the Trump administration, they are suggesting he can get his job back if he offers an apology and donates to TPUSA. Al Capone would be proud.

    This doesn’t bode well for companies that would rather sell out one of their top earners to curry Trump’s FCC favor in exchange for merger approval. This is not free market or capitalism. This is how you kowtow to fascists in power. It’s the least educated and ignorant who are the last to figure it out and when it’s too late.

    1. Regardless of ABC’s plans for the future of the program, Sinclair intends not to return Jimmy Kimmel Live! to our air until we are confident that appropriate steps have been taken to uphold the standards expected of a national broadcast platform.”

      Fat chance of jimmy coming back. Most of all, because of the demands of both Sinclair and ABC. His Goose is cooked.

      1. Dusty
        Many seem to forget that during the first Obama Administration, many top executives of the MSM or their spousal family members were part of the Obama Administration. I recall them making ABC the official Whitehouse media network early on. Corruption at its finest.

        1. Don’t forget what O-dumber did to the Tea Party. He use the power of Government (IRS) to keep them from their free speech.

      2. I would note – contrary to the left – Sinclair and Nestar told Disney/ABC that they would NOT run future Kimmel Broadcasts within 3 hours of Kimmels show. They were already lining up programs to fill the slot.

        This was LONG before anything was mentioned from anyone in the Trump administration.

        Those on the left are completely ignorant of the fact that Kimmels remarks enraged a significant portion of the tiny audience he had left.

        Trump is having fun keeping this in the news – it is damaging to left wing nuts.
        But Kimmel/ABC/Disney’s problem is NOT with Trump or the FCC – it is with their audience.

        Dying networks shoudl not pi$$ on what is left of their audience.

      3. Perhaps the next Democrat President will look at pulling Sinclair’s broadcast licenses if Kimmel is not restored.

        Assuming there is a Presidential election at all in 2028. I feel it will be a close run between turning the government over to Peter Thiel or to the guy who owns the most Supreme Court justices.

    2. Speaking of ignorant, you don’t know what fascism is. And Kimmel was going to be gone regardless of Trump; loads of affiliates were refusing to continue carrying the show. And at the root of it, Kimmel told a disgusting falsehood … what was his purpose?

      1. He told no disgusting falsehood. He merely pointed out that Trump didn’t care as much about Charlie Kirk as he did about the new ballroom. The first part is true – many conservatives expressed disappointment when the killer was revealed to have grown up in a conservative, white, gun-loving home.

        One victim of the ballroom was a 200 year old tree in good health, similar in age to that of the USA.

        Ironic.

        1. ATS – Kimmel said much more than that. He claimed that Robinson was a violent Right Wing extremist – a lie the left had been trying to spread from the start, and he did so AFTER it was solidly established that Robinson acted out of left wing political animus.
          By the Time Kimmel spoke Robinsons texts proving he committed the crime, and that it was a premeditated act of left wing violence had been available to Kimmel and the ABC net for over a day. ABC even reported on it. It was also well known at that time that his family and freinds had identified Robinson as a radicalized left wing nut.

          Kimmel either knowingly lied – defamining the Kirk family and half of the country,
          Or he did so with gross negligence to the same effect.

          This is far worse than the Nick Sandman nonsense that got CBS deeply in trouble.

          Kimmel F#$Ked up big time.

        2. ATS is it amazing (NOT!) your ability to mind read conservatives.

          The evidence is that Robinson was left wing radicallized OUTSIDE his family.

          Conservatives have always been angry that forces OUTSIDE their families have been able to ruin the lives of their children.

          Tyler Robinson was poisoned by YOU and your ilk.
          And the Robinson’s and an awful lot of conservatives are “mad as h311 and not going to take it anymore”

          Outside the far left – no one is felling sorry for Kimmel or nut job left wing professors who sprayed evil and have lost their jobs.

        1. Did you NOT read it. ABC and Sinclair canned him. Not the government…

          May God, some folks never learn to read.

          1. MERE HOURS AFTER Carr threatened them — “We can do this the easy way or the hard way…”

            Even Fox News covered this story.

            https://www.foxnews.com/media/fcc-chair-thinks-investigating-the-view-worthwhile-after-jimmy-kimmel-suspension

            Now, Carr is “investigating” “The View” – next on the list of dissenting voices to shut down.

            That sort of intervention is NOT letting the free market run its course. You understand that right?

            1. No but it is fully legal and constitutional according to the US supreme court and every democrati president has used the FCC to go after the right.

              I will be happy to join you in getting rid of the FCC

    3. Worse – this merger would not ordinarily be allowed due to exceeding market share limits; Kimmel is the sacrifice to bend that rule, a bribe.

      Also, so glad that the market “speaking” is the Sinclair Broadcast Group owner. I doubt conservatives even knew what Kimmel said as they don’t watch him to begin with.

      1. –But in retaliation and getback to Trump admin, ABC and NBC duly reported Sinclair’s action in one sentence this morning,– THEN SPENT @ 3 MINUTES PLAYING VIDEO OF KIMMEL’S ANTI-MAGA, ANTI-TRUMP statements to his live and TV audience so that Kimmel’s comments would get lots of exposure. Also, Microsoft and Google News are filling up their Internet pages with posts of Hollywood start backing up Kimmel.

        1. Please Please Please repeated Kimmel’s stupid and blatantly false remarks over and over and over. That would be the only thing better than firing him.

          “Also, Microsoft and Google News are filling up their Internet pages with posts of Hollywood start backing up Kimmel.”

          ROFL – absolutely “ordinary” americans backing Kimmel.

          Personally – I do not give a crap.

          If ABC wants to pi$$ away more money on Kimmel – GO FOR IT.
          Their going bankrupt and they are free to do so faster.

          I think Iger was right to fire “suspend indefinitely” Kimmel

          But that is his decision.
          I am sure Trump is happy – but that is not relevant.

          I will be also be happy if Democrats agree to end the FCC.

      2. Sinclair and nexstar claim they were flooded with complaints starting almost the moment Kimmel made his remarks.

        I do not know if conservatives watch kimmel or independnets and centrists were deeply offended.
        Regardless Sinclair and Nestar did not act based on the personal biases of their CEO’s
        but because the market demanded it.

    4. “Jimmy Kimmel has not been fired.”
      Correct – he has been suspended indefinitely.
      The request for an appology from Kimmel came from Bob Iger of Disney and it came long before FCC’s Carr said anything on a podcast.

      Kimmel offered an “appology” that was even more defamatory than his original post.
      Immediately after that Disney suspended Kimmel indefinitely.

      I have no clue what Kimmel’s future will be. I highly doubt it will be with ABC.
      He has not proven to be worth what he is paid, and he exposes ABC/Disney to massive risk of a multi-billion dollar defamation lawsuit.

      If I were to bet – Iger is no longer offering the oportunity to appologize.
      That has little or nothing to do with Trump.

      Kimmel gave Disney the oportunity to kill a non-performing show from an increasingly risky host.

      The simplest thing that Disney can do is – Nothing. Indefinitely can be a long long time.

      But I am not Bob Iger, and he can do as he pleases.

      He can roll the dice and gamble that Kimmel will not get ABC/Disney’s a$$ sued off,
      or he can quietly kill the show. My bet is the latter.

      ” However, as is standard practice for the Trump administration, they are suggesting he can get his job back if he offers an apology and donates to TPUSA.”
      Trump can not give him his job back – that is up to Bob Iger. but Trump offered good advice.
      ERica Kirk has the oportunity for a Massive lawsuit against Kimmel and ABC and Disney – as well as many others that Kimmel defamed. Kimmels remarks strongly mirror those that ot a Billion dollar award against Alex Jones. Iger’s suspension provides ABC/Disney with a defense – they did not know what Kimmel was going to say and they fired him for it. That is called mitigating damages.
      Donating to Kirks family would be another way to mitigate damages.

      I would note that Tyler Robinsons father REFUSED the reward offered for turning his son in and asked that it be given to the Kirk Family. That is what is called character.
      Those of you on the left should develop some character – instead of defending political assassins like Tyler, or those who glorify them or idiots like Kimmel that blame the victim.

      “This doesn’t bode well for companies”
      This is easy – do not massively defame the victim and half the country and you have no problem.
      And if you want to make money – produce material that people actually want to hear.

      “that would rather sell out one of their top earners”
      Kimmel was losing money hand over fist – his numbers were worse than Colberts.

      1. General comment

        The democrats are in a contest to say the most offensive thing while the Republicans mourn. In the running,

        1. Alex Cortez – kirk was an ignorant …
        2. Jeffries- I had a meeting

        😂

        DJT is downsizing the executive branch. An amendment to downsize the House is long overdue. States can elect whatever they want to their State legislatures and hurl obscenities and indecency till the cows come home. Fulton County in Georgia is a piece of work with rotting corpses in their prisons and jails and don’t leave out NY where Epstein was killed as the guards slept, cameras weren’t working, too.

        Shalom, sayonara, chow, adios…

Leave a Reply to Dannyboyo2Cancel reply