California is facing a perfect storm in finances, with a crippling deficit and a declining tax base. Now, a study of IRS data by the National Taxpayers Union Foundation found that California is losing a taxpayer roughly every minute, as states like Florida, Texas, and North Carolina attract new residents due to lower taxes and higher standards of living.
In comparison, Florida gains a new taxpayer every 2 minutes and 9 seconds while Texas gains one every 2 minutes and 53 seconds.
The result has been a bonanza for Florida, which is now collecting $4 billion more per year for its budget.
The states losing taxpayers at the fastest rate are California, New York, and Illinois. Here is the rate of loss:
California: every 1 minute and 44 seconds
New York: every 2 minutes and 23 seconds
Illinois: every 6 minutes and 4 seconds.
Massachusetts: every 11 minutes and 38 seconds
New Jersey: every 14 minutes and 14 seconds.
These remain high-tax states where there are even greater demands for tax increases (particularly in Illinois, California, and New York) as well as new spending demands. In Illinois, Mayor Brandon Johnson is pushing for disastrous new taxes, while in New York, incoming Zohran Mamdani is demanding new taxes to fund his free buses and other campaign promises.
In Seattle, socialist Katie Wilson won the mayoral election on the promise of new “progressive taxes” to fund an assortment of programs.
In Oregon, as Democratic politicians run on the rise in the cost of living, they just approved a gas tax hike as part of $4 billion tax and charge increases. They may be hoping that the decline in gas costs this year will make the tax less noticeable, but some citizens are pushing to place it on the ballot for voters.
In these states and cities, the assumption is that wealthy people will remain as voluntary game in a type of fiscal canned hunt as politicians discuss new wealth and other forms of taxes. They are not. They are leaving with their wealth and their tax payments.
Unions continue to push for these new taxes as high-tax-paying residents leave these states. At the same time, California and Illinois continue to push their status as sanctuary states, increasing the public burden for schools, hospitals and other programs. As they increase spending and their tax base contracts, the outcome is obvious.
Again, take California. The state experienced a $9 billion decline in taxpayer funds during 2018. That number increased to $29 billion lost in 2020.
As I discuss in my forthcoming book, Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution, there is a common myth that the top five percent of this country do not “pay their fair share.” However, putting that debate aside, the question is whether it will produce more revenue than it costs the state in the long run. As these politicians campaign on clipping the “fat cats” who are not paying their fair share, many are likely to follow the exodus to lower tax states with greater fiscal discipline.
There are many in states like Florida and Texas who worry that new residents from states like New York and California will replicate their prior voting patterns and produce the same disastrous policies in their new states. I just spoke in Boise, Idaho where many are complaining that Californians are moving to the state and adopting the same policies that produced the conditions that they just left behind. The fear is that the voters will not be willing to vote for conservatives or libertarians and simply move like a liberal diaspora from state to state as they reproduce prior tax and fiscal policies.
Time will tell. However, what is clear is that Democratic states are not showing any greater fiscal discipline as they careen toward budget meltdowns.
Ranked: The Cities Americans Are Moving To
As migration patterns shift across the U.S., some cities are emerging as magnets for new residents. A combination of affordability, climate, and job opportunities continues to draw people to the South and West.
This visualization highlights where Americans are choosing to move, based on new residency data from 2024 compiled by Point2Homes.
By: Bruno Venditti Graphics/Design: Amy Kuo ~ November 7, 2025
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ranked-the-cities-americans-are-moving-to/
Ref.:Point2Homes
https://www.point2homes.com/news/research/us-mobility-rates-reach-historical-low.html
The more telling statistic might be the rate at which the US is gaining/losing red and blue voters.
That ratio is more important for gauging national trajectory.
In twenty-five years (2050) we will be either more red or more blue.
Boils down to the Takers Vs. the Self-reliant ratio (T:SR).
Trump’s lieutenants have done a terrific job of rooting-out the thieving takers (all blue voters: illegals, USAID programs, lawfare clowns, etc.)
Still, democrats are likely to win back control in 2028 by using more stealthy election-theft engineering.
It will be another inflection point (like 2024) and it doesn’t look good.
Somehow, Soros wins his lifelong struggle to splinter the US.
Decadence is on his side.
(on Soros: his view is that Christianity is simply a misperception that must be eradicated and that cannot be achieved unless America is destroyed.)
@Anon 10:10 AM “Still, democrats are likely to win back control in 2028 by using more stealthy election-theft engineering”
Why wait until 2028?
Saw the attack and closing of “Red” district polling places in NJ to eliminate those votes who had to go to work?
Or that registered “Third Party” voters (Independents and “Third Party” registered voters – 30% of voters registered in Chester County, Pennsylvania [deep blue]) ) were eliminated from the Poll Books (at every polling station) and had to spend vast amounts of time waiting in line for their “provisional ballot”, dox themselves with information required to submit a “provisional ballot” which took a long time to fill out – before even touching the “ballot”, then standing in line again to “submit their Provisional Ballot, and when they did so, the “Minority Investigator” and the “Judge of Elections” refused to sign them as required by the Instructions thereby invalidating your ballot [“we’ll sign them after you leave”] – totaling probably more than an hour. Most purged independent voters just looked at it and decided they could not miss work to do so. And those who decided to return when the polls were held open realized (and unreported, of course) they STILL had to cast provisional ballots and perform the dog scraps from the table routine. Those polling places run by elected Democrat “Poll Workers” just knew they had a list of whose should be thrown out or replaced with the ones created in voting factories “when counted”.
OOOOOOHHHH – and did I mention the Chester County “Provisional Ballots” “have been accepted”, but were never counted – even 18 days after the “Election Results” were announced. Net result will be OOPS, somebody goofed and we promise it won’t happen again – at least until the national elections, and anyone who even questions will be identified as a “conspirator” and can expect an imminent re-valuation of their property(s) for increased property taxation as stated on their “provisional ballot envelopes”. Not only has your right to vote been removed, you will be doxed to ANTIFA to make sure you don’t ever vote again.
https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/politics/third-party-voters-chester-county-pennsylvania-election-day/4296650/
https://apnews.com/article/pennsylvania-voting-registration-charges-00b6c6ab111a52b6aa902f1f78d42528
Just wait until states like Illinois, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Connecticut try to enact a proposed California-style exit tax where the world-wide assets of California expats to other state are taxed yearly for 10 years AFTER a citizen establishes residency in another state. The prospect of this being enacted in California may be part of what’s driving some of the current emigration from California, like the Hollywood liberal elite relocating to Idaho and Montana. Leave it to blue state politicians like those in California, and likely elsewhere, to dream up this equivalent of an economic Berlin Wall.
Any honest court (certainly SCOTUS) would regard that as unconstitutional based on illegal confiscation of property as written in the Fifth Amendment: The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution reads as follows: “Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
The only way this “exit tax” will stand is if the Dems take the House (which unfortunately they will) and take the senate. Then without a Manchin and a Sinema they get rid of the filibuster and pack the Court. Once the Court is packed with 5 more Jacksons and Sotomayors all legal reasoning will be on the level of a campus sit-in and states like CA will be able to tax people wanting to leave.
Smart Californians, as well as NY, MA, IL, NJ, OR and WA will leave prior to the law being enacted. However ex post factor will be null and void once KBJ and her ilk run the Court. So basically I would suggest you leave now.
“The only way this “exit tax” will stand is if the Dems take the House (which unfortunately they will) and take the senate. Then without a Manchin and a Sinema they get rid of the filibuster and pack the Court.”
I don’t know about Illinois, but if (PR)NJ enacted an exit tax and SCOTUS overruled it, (PR)NJ would just ignore the ruling. They have already done just that, with impunity, regarding the 2nd Amendment and the tests of historical consistency established in Bruen. Why would anyone think that they would not gleefully repeat that defiance regarding the 4th, when compliance would actually cost them money?
I have always found it interesting that when the Left spouts about “the rich must pay their fair share”, they never define exactly what they think is the Fair Share. I don’t know if anyone has ever asked them. One would think it would be an obvious question.
Fair share = More! (it will never be enough for them, as it’s simply divisive propaganda).
“they never define exactly what they think is the Fair Share.”
100% plus. The plus is, since complete confiscation of the wealth of everyone who could be considered wealthy by any objective standard would fail to pay for the largess that the leftist thieves believe they deserve, those thieves must not only confiscate it all, but somehow convince the wealthy to keep on producing that wealth so that they can steal more of it. Anyone with even a room temperature IQ should be able to clearly see the complete fallacy of that premise. Of course, they won’t, because they completely and deliberately misunderstand the concept of incentive.
off topic
hey, on national television this morning, Dem. ELissa Slotkin just REVISED what she and five other Dem members of Congress actually told military troops in the their controversial video.
She REPEATEDLY told Martha Raddatz that troops “should consult the JAG if they believe they are being ordered to follow and illegal order. That is not what she said in the video
What a LIE, NEVER said they should talk to JAG. WATCH THE VIDEO. And raddatz did not challenge her!
Raddatz never challenges any Democrat because she is one.
The Republicans complain about Socialists but they practice the same policies. Trump wants to give $2,000 tariff rebates to everyone making less than $100,000 per year. He claims that $100,000 is “high income” and those who earn that much presumably don’t “need” the money. This is classic Marxism. “From each according to his abilities; to each according to his needs.” Taking money from those who actually pay the taxes, and distributing it to those who pay little to no income taxes is as Socialist as it gets. Although it would be preferable to use the money to pay down the national debt, IMO, if Trump wants to give it away, then give it equally to everyone, even if that means a lesser amount per person, and let the individual decide whether to spend it, invest it, donate it, or stick it under the mattress. That’s capitalism.
“. . . clipping the ‘fat cats’ . . .” (JT)
“Movers from California are typically younger, make a modest income of around $53,500 . . .”
The upper-income emigrants have an AGI of $130,000.
As is typical with socialism, “fat cats” is progressively defined down — until it means anyone with 3 chickens (while others only have 1).
If you count the population of California by taxpayers instead of residents, CA has had a net loss every single year for well over a decade.
Taxpayers have been leaving in large numbers for 20 years.
Tax consumers are arriving – until only very recently – in sufficiently large numbers to disguise the exodus.
Is anyone really surprised? We have seen IRS data showing this exodus from Blue states for a number of years.
The question is, are they going to learn and change their voting habits or just continue to vote for the same policies that they fled failed states like CA, IL and NY?
You are wrong.
Recent data indicates a continued migration of high-earning individuals, particularly wealthy millennials, from high-cost blue states like California and New York to more affordable red states such as Florida, Texas, and North Carolina, driven primarily by housing affordability and high living costs rather than taxes alone.
However, evidence suggests that the wealthy are not leaving in mass exodus due to tax increases, with studies showing that high earners are less likely to move than the general population and often relocate to other high-tax states rather than low-tax ones.
Wealthy millennials, defined as those aged 26 to 45 earning over $200,000 annually, are increasingly relocating from California and New York to states like Florida and Texas, with California losing 9,181 such households and New York losing 4,251 between 2021 and 2022.
While some reports highlight significant net income outflows from states like California and New York, experts argue that the impact on state budgets is overstated, as the wealthy contribute to tax revenues through property, sales, and other taxes, and many remain in place despite political or tax differences.
Contrary to popular belief, research from Cornell University and the Fiscal Policy Institute shows that millionaires move less frequently than the general population and are not significantly deterred by higher taxes, with only 0.3% of millionaires moving to lower-tax states annually.
The migration trend is also influenced by demographic shifts, such as retirees moving to lower-cost, warmer climates, and the availability of housing, with southern states experiencing significant housing construction growth compared to high-cost coastal areas.
“. . . housing affordability and high living costs rather than taxes alone.”
You don’t see a connection there?
Sam,
Right??
I only said IRS data pointed out the exodus, i.e. tax filings in another state indicating that tax filer has moved. I never said anything about housing or cost of living. Kinda thought that would be obvious.
Obviously, he/she is not a typical home owner. Or, if he/she is, they outright own their home and are wealthy enough to consider taxes (after deduction value) a mere trivial annoyance.
You not only conflate millionaires, wealthy and wealthy millennials and provide somewhat conflicting data interpretations regarding those populations, you do not address the seeming facts presented in the article and the comments you responded to:
-IRS data suggesting exodus from blue states (compatible with congressional redistricting shifts of seats from blue to red states)
-the article itself stating the states are losing “taxpayers” not specifically ‘millionaires, wealthy and wealthy millennials’.
Add to that, the often repeated drumbeat from the Democrats that the wealthy are ‘not paying their fair share’ and you have the seeming result that the blue state’s loss is actually in the biggest part of their tax base: those that ‘pay their fair share’. If true, that would explain the massive tax losses in the blue states and the similar massive tax gains in the red states as stated in the article
Given the apparent inconsistency, it seems you are in no position to declare anyone is “wrong”.
“are they going to learn and change their voting habits or just continue to vote for the same policies that they fled”
My reluctant prediction is that those fleeing will continue to use their votes in a self-destructive manner, to recreate at their destinations the very conditions they are fleeing. Look at Colorado and Arizona. As late as the 1980s, both states had reliably conservative majorities nearly everywhere except for 1 or 2 large cities. Now they are becoming (or have already become) leftist strongholds. Parts of Florida have exhibited this phenomenon as well. fortunately it has as yet not infected the entire state. I confess that I am baffled at how so many people can be that irrational, but I suspect that unless there is some truly fundamental, consciousness-jarring, wake up event (or series of such events) it is unlikely to change.
@UpstateFarmer, California voters recently passed the redistricting map that was so blatantly discriminatory towards Republicans that there is no way they will change. The morals of the majority have no morals to be fair.
As Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene just described, Party Politics isn’t moral anymore.
The idea that people leaving high tax/liberal states will bring their voting patterns with them seems credible when you think about how MA emigres changed NH’s electoral process turning the Granite State almost blue. HOWEVER, when you consider FL you have to note that the state is more red than it was 20 years ago during the age of hanging chads. FL was a swing state and not it a great red state. Seems like an anomaly when thinking about NH, ID and AZ, but TX hasn’t given Dems their big breakthrough yet and Dems have actually been doing worse their over the last 10 years or so.
To prevent a red state from turning purple or blue because of the voting practices and habits of blue state citizen immigrants, getting out the vote of existing red state conservative-minded citizens will be essential. Maybe after a few drubbings at the polls, the liberal-minded, tax-increase voting, anti-second amendment formerly blue state immigrants to red states will move back to the states from where they came.
The idea that people leaving high tax/liberal states will bring their voting patterns with them seems credible when you think about how MA emigres changed NH’s electoral process turning the Granite State almost blue….. wrong.
Voting patterns. That’s BS, if anything had a effect on change it was a new generation of Granite Staters, birthed by the previous generation and the few Bay Staters who do move to NH, are retirees taking advantage of NH’s favorable tax status. And are conservative by nature. The so called rich Bay Staters do not move to NH to live there, rather they setup us trusts to shelter income.
So that voting pattern analogy is compete malarkey.
The problem is, like other Blue states, the refugees from other states mass in the major metropolitan cities here in Texas, and they do bring their voting patterns with them. Houston, Dallas, Fort Worth, San Antonio and Austin are all deep blue and the elections are getting tighter statewide as our demographics change. What is especially infuriating to me is that those moving into the state continue to use their ‘home’ state license plates for as long as they can, oblivious to the fact that they are identifying themselves as carpetbaggers.
The other question will be what effect the increasing movement of illegal immigrants back to their home countries will have on the economy. The “rich” leave with their incomes and then the illegals leave because of the mass deportations under trump. These states may see a loss of both richer citizens and loss of citizens to deportation, which may then result in decreasing congressional representation and subsequently lost power in Washington. Sounds like several trains converging on one point. Which train will hit first and how bad will it be.
The top 5% in income pay 61% of total US income tax collected and the top 10% pay 72% of total income tax collected. So maybe the rich do pay their fair share. As of 2022.
the illegals leave because of …. the fact is illegals never leave, as long as there’s one government program to pillage.
Kindly, anon, I must point out the racist, bigot comment you’ve made, “pillage”. I do so without ill intent. The people you reference were invited in by officials Mayorkas and elected Biden among others. These people aren’t familiar with the US and are offered these welfare programs and think it’s a way of life in the United States because it’s there, offered and received.
Instead of villainizing these people you might accuse, try and punish the officials responsible at the head of government. That would glaringly be Biden, Mayorkas and democrats.
The migrants are people with feelings and you’ve misplaced your aggression. The criminal migrants should not be tolerated but not abused.
There solid Americans of Mexican descent and others who are being devastated by the shame they feel now and people look at those excellent Americans as if they are “wetbacks” to use the common vulgar language and they speak it as you might also do.
I am devastated by this humiliation for what are indeed wonderful American individuals. I remain devastated.
I mean to take you to task only kindly. I do not mean to harm, humiliate you by my words. Please, think before speaking and put the anger where it belongs.
Thank you
You’re moving those percentages toward an 80/20 when 20% of the population pays 80% of the taxes or 80% of the population pay 20% of the taxes. 20% of the population are the most productive. That’s the cream. Move to 80% of the population pays 0 taxes and there’s little lost. They’re labor creating nothing in reality. 20% is trying to create jobs for them. Knock off the 20% as indigent bottom and there’s the middle group.
Madmani wants to kill off the 20% who are the actual producers.
Pareto principle
GEB ^^^ California is moving toward an indigent State to semi indigent. It’ll hit a brick wall and become the Mississippi Delta– al Green, save medicaid. Is he shouting at China? The only nations willing to sell cheap shoddy goods and food are China and other 3rd worlds or worse. Lead in your sugar and spices will ensure mental retardation.
Brilliant game plan , Barry. Just brilliant, Alex.
The problem with socialism and communism is the partial deletion of self interest. People who go to work run on self interest no matter how big or small the income is. Very few go to work everyday because of duty.
Back in the 1980’s we had bumper stickers that opined “Please Do Not Californicate Oregon!”.
Alas….they did.
And look what they created, a race of animals known as conservatives on the west coast, aka bigfoots.
““Please Do Not Californicate Oregon!”.
Alas….they did.”
Washington as well, although I think that state had a head start.
Yep. Vote by mail and the libs control it. Ever wonder why it takes weeks to count (all) the votes.
The root problem with these flights of citizens is that these states are utterly unable to reconcile the conflict between what should be and what is – namely the consequences of excessive taxation. Even farther than “reconcile,” they do not or cannot even recognize there is a conflict, so emotionally tied they have become to progressive ideology.
Odd this is, given that America is the home of American pragmatism given us by Harvard philosopher and psychologist William James (1842-1910). Pragmatists operate on applying the practicality of what works and what doesn’t, in brief. Pragmatism built America.
Here’s what a fake psychologist says: they do not or cannot even recognize there is a conflict, so emotionally tied they have become to progressive ideology…. Um… thats an obvious lie. No facts, just grabs a few words off the internet and he’s up and ready to spew lies and psychobabble.
Sometimes, young man, your stupidity simply exceeds stupidity itself.
So true and ANO loves to show it.
gdonaldallen,
Well said.
Pragmatism does not seem to be in the DNA of the Democrat party. Proof of this is their pro-trans and anti-women policies.
In the DNA? What sort of mumbo jumbo is that? And how does the lack of pragmatism relate to pro-trans and anti-woman, i.e., a lack of common sense dictates policy? Whew!
“Pragmatism built America.”
You are sorely mistaken.
Pragmatism does *not* mean being “practical” in the American sense of successful action toward a noble goal. It is the philosophy behind the modern, noxious notion: the ends justifies the means.
“It is the philosophy behind the modern, noxious notion: the ends justifies the means.”
That is truly a noxious (straight-up evil, imo) premise, but I think you are incorrect about the modernity. I am currently reading R. Chernow’s biography of Alexander Hamilton, and it appears that a number of the Founders were sympathetic to that idea to some larger or smaller extent (varied by individual), including Hamilton himself. Unfortunately, those who favored the idea were apparently unaware that it cannot be embraced in a limited way, then discarded when expedient (that was Hamilton’s conceptualization); it is a pervasive, terminal disease.
“. . . it is a pervasive, terminal disease.”
Today it is. During the FF’s, it was not. Their dominant method was to be principled.
Owners of businesses can live in any State or foreign country and utilize California labor and utilize labor subsidies such as welfare thank you very much. You made it all possible ☺
😂 ^^^^ exactly
Tragic actually, make it, sell it to foreign nations, pay taxes on it, then buy it back at 4x the price. How many times will you pay for the same thing? What a scam.
California thinks that Obamacare is such a great plan that they decided to run their entire state along the same model!
California thinks that Obamacare is sich … Really? All U.S. states participate in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly known as “Obamacare.”
Simplification for your:
It’s the model of ever increasing tax subsidies for an underlying failing boondoggle.
will be left with Woke, liberal etc… No they will not.
Correct! You will be left with heaps of on-the-dolers that will demand healthcare, housing and a minimum existence subsidy from the state. “Woke”, “liberal” and any other label will become meaningless at that point.
will demand healthcare, housing and a minimum existence subsidy …. just like whites do in the all the 50 states?
Ever notice that, to racists, everything is about race?
And so the circling the drain goes….
That’s’ really deep.
How deep it is is not the point. The fact that you understood it is all that is important.
Socialist and communist could not participate in US politics as separate parties, so they are taking over the Democrat Party. Part of this plan will be to take over populous cities and states to cement their political gains and influence federal legislation. I doubt they mind losing taxpayers who likely would oppose this plan. Even the Democrat ones. We better start doing something about it
“Socialist and communist could not participate in US politics as separate parties”. Really?
The headquarters for the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) is located at 235 W 23rd Street, 7th floor, New York, NY 10011.
Socialist Party of America, is headquartered at 168 Canal Street, 6th Floor, New York City, New York 10013.
Such a concrete thinker!
Concrete you say? Like your head.
Attempt at insult is the next natural step for a concrete thinker exposed. Keep up the good work at providing ‘proof’!
Ex Dem,
You are on a roll, owning the annony moron!! Good job!
One of the greatest myths perpetrated on the American public is the rich don’t pat their fair share. This plays into the definition of rich which is anyone making more than themselves. Also a fair share is a moving target and never enough. Even if our government confiscated all the wealth of the “rich” it would only solve about a year of the spending problem. Like the saying goes socialism works until it runs out of other people’s money.
What?
Florida resident here. It seems that the immigrant voting pattern matches the home state. For example, people from NYC will still vote for high taxes AFTER moving to Florida for the low taxes. But, people from upstate New York seem to vote more conservative but still for higher taxes than long time Floridians. In short, they don’t learn their lesson and are probably going to ruin it for us.
“It seems that the immigrant voting pattern matches the home state.” Seems? “Seem” is your interpretation of an opinion based on zero facts.
Point well taken since “seems” and not factual references were provided. Care to provide your factual basis for claiming there are “zero facts”?
Zero facts? Easy, you presented none in your comment.
Another “point well taken”! However, if you look closely, I made no claims that required supporting facts!! Did you catch that?? 😉
Agree. Same here in Texas.
Also, living in Texas is not as good. Interstate and city traffic is bad because the State can’t build roads fast enough. And I can’t forget that home prices rapidly accelerated which caused our property taxes to rapidly increase.
Here’s the major problem, those moving from high taxed states! They will ultimately cause the low taxed states to increase taxes with their ridiculous demands and left wing voting practices. I’ve seen it firsthand, they come and immediately complain about traffic, water, septics, firearms, police, you name it, they have a problem. Then they get on a council or two and the problems really start. Please stay in your blue state and correct the problems you created.
I’ve seen it firsthand… Really. That’s an obvious lie. Now the other point, who the f are you to tell an American what he can or cannot do? You sickening, disgusting animal.
Anonymous? Really that says it all
Anonymous? Really that says it all. You forgot the period. Now it says it all.
anonymous says: You sickening, disgusting animal.” Son you really shouldn’t speak to your mother in that fashion, after all she does allow you a bed in the basement.
Son? I doubt you have the capability to procreate. With humans..
Care to provide the supporting facts for your “doubt”?
Facts? yeah, you’re a republican. Sterile. You are living proof.
Alas, attempted insult is the last refuge of a failing concrete thinker. You reveal yourself. And again you provide no proof to your claims.
Ex Dem,
Actually it is leftist Democrats who are failing in birthrates. Financial Times did a article on birth rates. It found Progressives birthrate was 1.6 per woman of birthing age. It was 2.4 per woman of birthing age for Conservatives. The replacement rate is 2.1 per woman of birthing age.
So, Democrats are quite literally (non) breeding themselves out of existence.
Wife and I did our duty to keep Conservatives alive!
My sister, a Democrat, did not.
How marvelous!
Care to provide your facts supporting your claim it is “an obvious lie”?
Conservatism as practiced by sick demented female.
Thanks, comrade! Care to provide the supporting facts for your claim?
There’s a drag queen here in Baltimore with the same name, Margot Ballhere. Pretty sure its one and the same. Has a long jong.
“ here in Baltimore”. Tells everyone here what we need to know about your vile remarks.
Margot,
Correct the problems they created? I doubt they see their dismal policies as the source of the problems they created. They just stick their heads in the sand and pretend it never happened.
States such as California/NY will be left with Woke, Liberal, Left Wing wealthy DEM’s and Illegals. Higher and Higher Taxes, crumbling social structure and Foooools for Leaders. As well as these states will see higher and higher Debts and cut back in services.
Got proof of that please?
He’s making a prediction, you idiot.
Concrete thinking comrade bots don’t really want proof! They likely just want to participate, create obstacles and throw bombs