In her sometimes bizarre and often combative testimony, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis explained, “I just think men and women think differently.” At least when it comes to Pete Skandalakis, she is demonstrably correct. Serving as Willis’s replacement after her removal from the Trump case for personal misconduct in hiring her former lover as lead prosecutor, Skandalakis found the case against Trump and his associates worthy of dismissal. In so doing, he suggested (as did many of us) that the entire foundation for the case was flawed from the outset.
Some of us have been loud critics of the racketeering case brought by Willis from the outset, calling it legally and factually absurd. The loosely constructed theory placed Trump at the center of an enterprise with 18 other individuals who had little to do with each other as a group, let alone in a conspiracy.
The case was always an example of raw, open lawfare, but Willis was widely heralded by politicians and pundits for her efforts. Even when she was found to have hired her former lover, Nathan Wade, and botched the prosecution, she was lionized by the left.
The grand jury report was a mess. The case began as a virtual circus with a grand jury report that was a mess and a self-proclaimed witch as foreperson. Emily Kohrs proceeded to give spellbinding, giggling interviews touting the merits of the case.
Skandalakis shredded the case against Trump and the other defendants, noting that it was premised on biased assumptions about individuals’ motivations. For example, he criticized Willis for charging former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) and others over their statements to the Georgia Legislature. He observed that such charges “would have a chilling effect on witnesses,” and raised “serious constitutional questions” concerning free speech.
Likewise, he expressly criticized the charging of former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows over a call Trump had with Georgia election officials asking them to “find 11,780 votes.” As many of us have written, Skandalakis noted that “reasonable minds could differ as to how to interpret the call.” That call was the focus of much of the media and political support for the prosecution.
Much of the media responded to the news with a shrug and moved on after years of fawning over Willis and running misleading stories on the legal merits. Pundits who appeared nightly to support the prosecution as manifestly well-founded were nowhere to be found.
Former prosecutor Joyce Vance said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that the prosecution “looks like a slam dunk.” Others, like former acting U.S. Solicitor General Neal Katyal, praised Willis’s efforts. Laurence Tribe, who supported a litany of ridiculous charges against Trump, including attempted murder, heralded the prosecution as based on incontrovertible evidence.
The media that ignored any opposing views has moved on with the same experts to the new narrative of the death of democracy.
With the long-overdue collapse of the Georgia case, three of the four criminal prosecutions are now dead. Trump was convicted in his New York hush money case, but was sentenced to no jail time. That case is still in the courts, and could also be overturned entirely.
Willis spent millions on this effort, wasted her office’s personnel, and cost the courts copious time and effort. Yet, even with the disclosures of her misconduct and the poor handling of the case, she was reelected. She knew the mob and the media. It did not matter if she lost or spent a fortune. The pursuit of Trump remains a self-authenticating credential on the left.
Of course, there remains the status of Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, Kenneth Chesebro, and Scott Hall, all of whom decided to cut deals to lesser charges. The deals allowed them to avoid additional costs and time without losing their licenses or incurring jail time. Such deals are not necessarily overturned by later decisions to drop a case. Indeed, they generally come with an agreement to waive appeals.
In her testimony, Willis was often unglued and unprofessional. Yet that, too, was largely ignored by a fawning media. She waved around papers, yelling “Lies! Lies! Lies!” as the left complimented her for her defiance. At one point, she insisted that opposing counsel’s “interests are contrary to democracy, your honor, not to mine.”
The conclusion of this case only reaffirms that it was her interests alone that drove this prosecution from supporting her former lover with a huge salary to advance her political career. The people of Fulton County paid that bill and then reelected her.
Even Emily Kohrs got her fifteen minutes of fame and was bewitched by the process, which she described as “really cool. . . . I got 60 seconds of eye contact with everyone who came in the room. You can tell a lot about people in that 60 seconds.” She expressed how “insanely excited” she was for the chance to play a role in the indictments. At the end of the case, only the insanity remained.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and the author of the best-selling book “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
This column ran on Fox.com
Maybe Halligan is just really unlucky against defendants with James is their name?
James: 2
Halligan: 0
But I’m told she really knows how to handle Dicks
But I’m told she really knows how to handle Dicks
Maybe you’re trying that because it was Fani Willis who used taxpayer dollars to hire the only Dick willing to jump that lardass of hers? Even if her Dick was named Nathan Wade?
But you could offer to give blowjobs to your fellow Dicks in the Democrat Borg if you’re wrong, and the prosecution of those two James proceeds after the judge that put them out on parole is reversed.
ATS – this is just round one.
John Say posted: There is no doubt Trump was a playboy, that he cheated on his wives. But there is no credible allegation that he committed sexual assault.The E Jean Carrol case should have been dismissed at the start.
The New York Democrats’ police state fascism that was the Carrol case began with New York Democrats working in collusion with Jeffrey Epstein’s bro (who is now hiding from the media) Reid Hoffman, passing a bill of attainder specifically intended to make one single person, Trump, a legal target for Democrat police state fascist lawfare.
Only in New York could an Epstein pedophile (and Democrat powerbroker similar to the Clinton/Obama’s White House pervert Harvey Weinstein) like Reid Hoffman engineer going after Trump for allegedly committing rape.
And the best they could do after doing so, with all the hundreds of women that were fawning all over Trump hoping to exchange sex for money during those years, is Hoffman funding Carrol’s attempts to take out Trump with vague claims that 30+ years ago, Trump sexually assaulted her, in some year or other, in some place.
The legal questions regarding the constitutional view of that bill of attainder or the manner in which that trial was conducted in Trump-hating New York aside, the remaining question is the application of Occam’s Razor:
Looking at the beauty and social standing of all the women in New York who practically fought each other just be seen hanging on Trump’s arm in Studio 54 and the New York celebrity cocktails and canapes party scene….
Who in their rational right mind can imagine any man with the ability of Trump back then to have beautiful women crawling all over him, hoping for at least one night, can believe that Trump would turn down that to put himself at legal jeopardy to instead force himself on something as skanky looking as the then well-known-weirdo, E Jean Carrol?
They couldn’t even find what would be the most damning physical evidence: two large burlap bags and a clothes pin.
One bag to pull over E Jean Carrol’s head, the other for Trump to pull over his own head so he couldn’t see what he was doing – and the clothes pin for his nose so he couldn’t smell her stench.
When asked to identify E Jean Carol in some pictures with him from the 80’s I believe – he identified her as Marla Maples.
Why ? Because once upon a time E Jean Carrol actually looked alot like Marla Maples.
She is not attractive now, but that was not always true.
She is nuts now – she likely was always nuts.
While the EJC case was a civil defamation case – therefore has a very low standard of proof, Carrol did not come anywhere close to meeting that
standard of proof and the case should have been dismissed early on.
The Carrol Case points out why Statutes of Limitations exist.
It is not important that the evidence to prosecute someone might weaken or go away over time.
What matters is that the ability of the defendant to defend themselves is damaged by time.
The case turned into he said vs. she said – but only because Carrol was unable to articulate a claim that could be supported or undermined by evidence. She could not even pick the year this occured.
Regardless the claim that Carrol was not attractive at that time is false. Likely still nuts.
But the one damaging statement Trump made was that she was not his type – Marla Maples was clearly Trump’s type and Trump misidentifed Carrol as Maples.
Willis hired Nathan Wade when they were still interpersonally involved. There is plenty evidence of such involvement, by their own testimonies. Why does Turley repeat that Wade was her former boyfriend? Also, Willis repeatedly invoked trial by headline by holding press conferences in the black church, claiming God to be on the side of the prosecution. That is improper conduct for a prosecutor.
When the final chapter of Fani Willis’ life is written, it will say that when a black woman finally got a chance to set a high standard for black women to follow. She failed. The same will be written for Latitia James.
*. Obviously she’s a malicious court jester seeking evil revenge using position. It’s an archetypal character in literature- Poe has Hop-Frog.
The MDs here might explain the endorphins as part of rage high. PT describes it as the age of rage and an addiction. It’s a lack of categorical moral imperatives. There are so many currently and subject to their self demise.
People like Madmani and Omar see themselves as colonials, colonists.
I don’t give it much attention. It’s RICO and the crime is grift and graft.
Have a good Thanksgiving.
Republicans get punished for NOT committing Crimes
Democrats don’t get punished FOR Committing Crimes.
Got it!
Circus Maledictus
To me this saga was one pole of the Left’s attitude towards free speech. Trump gets on the phone to GA’s Secretary of State, alleging thousands of ineligible votes were cast, asking Raff to review them all, but at least the 11K margin of Biden’s apparent victory. If Trump believed he was the victim of fraud, why shouldn’t he be able to ask for a recheck?
The other pole is the Seditious Six’s urging our troops to disobey orders, promising that “they have [the mutineers’] back.” This is no longer speech, but conduct. Not even lawyers agree on the legality of Trump’s orders — how is an 18 or 19 yo going to decide?
Wow! Just how egregiously and thoroughly did “Crazy Abe” —- up this once-free and once-great nation?
Anonymous the George with his crazy Abe thing again. The south was selling cotton to Great Britain used to make the sales of the ships sent to attack America. It would be like the U.S. government selling guns to the Mexican cartel so that they could ship poison into our nation. Oh wait, that happened under a Democratic administration. Anonymous the George the first thing every morning sings The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down. A Democrat with an obsession? Who would have known?
Wow! Just how egregiously and thoroughly did “Crazy Abe” —- up this once-free and once-great nation?
Wow! Just how stupid is the seditious Confederate Kluxxer communist Mad King George X, posting while using his alias pen name of Anonymous this afternoon?
To believe readers here won’t recognize this is one of his Anonymous comments where he attempts to hide his Confederate Democrat Kluxxer identity as he copies and pastes his daily/weekly whines about losing his Confederate Democrat Kluxxer forerunners losing their seditious attempt to keep America born black Americans as Darkie draft animals to still be enslaved to the likes of Mad King George X?
The overwhelming singular failure of the American republic rights and freedoms experiment has been voters allowing the continued existence of the vile and violent, seditious DNC and their equally vile members like GeorgeX.
OK, one lawfare case flushed with finality.
The truly important investigation would expose the coordination, through the illegitimate Biden Whitehouse, of all of the lawfare ops.
All of that verbiage to say, “The Innocent Get the Shaft”. I hope when Trump terms out he goes on a lawfare rampage on these creeps and bankrupts them all. We’ll can call that “The Day the Normies got Their Win”.
He needs to go scorched earth NOW so that when he ends his term the enemy is as weak and scattered as possible.
Apparently the goal of this prosecution was never justice — it was ratings. The left got their sound bites, the media got their circus, the prosecutor got her “hero” moment, and even the grand juror got to treat indictments like she was fangirling at Comic-Con. Now that the case has fizzled, the silence is deafening… because the mission was accomplished: sow doubt, score a team win, and add one more performance to a country already confused about what justice is for.
National dysphoria on full display — a legal system acting like a fan club and calling it democracy.
I can relate more to the peasants with torches and pitchforks, than I can to today’s “just-us” system.
Oh, BTW, Happy Thanksgiving. Even the Indians are rolling over in their graves over this one!
Absolutely BRUTAL TAKEDOWN OF THE POISONOUS LAWFARE of the opposition. I think that the opposition is not only down for the 10-Count, but it could be lights out forever. Well done Professor✅️✅️✅️….👌
In a functional country all those who participated in the attempted coup would be in jail. But in the US we have a law prof cheering those traitors being let off the hook.
In the end only one (Babbitt) got true justice.
Did he just say,” In a functional country, all those who participated in the attempted coup would be in jail.”
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”
– Barack Obama
____________________
“We will stop him.”
– Peter Strzok to FBI paramour Lisa Page
_____________________________________________
“[Obama] wants to know everything we’re doing.”
– Lisa Page to FBI paramour Peter Strzok
_____________________________________________
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before 40.”
– Peter Strzok to FBI parmour Lisa Page
____________________________________________
“People on the 7th floor to include Director are fired up about this [Trump] server.”
– Bill Priestap
________________
“I had a discussion with the case team and we believe there to be predication to include former President of the United States Donald J. Trump as a predicated subject.”
– Timothy Thibault to John Crabb, U.S. Attorney’s Office, D.C.
___________________________________________________________________
The Obama Coup D’etat in America is the most egregious abuse of power and the most prodigious crime in American political history. The co-conspirators are:
Kevin Clinesmith, Bill Taylor, Eric Ciaramella, Rosenstein, Mueller/Team, Andrew Weissmann,
James Comey, Christopher Wray, McCabe, Strozk, Page, Laycock, Kadzic, Sally Yates,
James Baker, Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr, Priestap, Kortan, Campbell, Sir Richard Dearlove,
Christopher Steele, Simpson, Joseph Mifsud, Alexander Downer, Stefan “The Walrus” Halper,
Azra Turk, Kerry, Hillary, Huma, Mills, Brennan, Gina Haspel, Clapper, Lerner, Farkas, Power,
Lynch, Rice, Jarrett, Holder, Brazile, Sessions (patsy), Nadler, Schiff, Pelosi, Obama,
Joe Biden, James E. Boasberg, Emmet Sullivan, Gen. Milley, George Soros, John McCain,
Marc Elias, Igor Danchenko, Fiona Hill, Charles H. Dolan, Jake Sullivan, Strobe Talbot,
Cody Shear, Victoria Nuland, Ray “Red Hat” Epps, Don Berlin, Kathy Ruemmler, Rodney Joffe,
Paul Vixie, L. Jean Camp, Andrew Whitney, Lisa O. Monaco, Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg,
Matthew Colangelo, Merrick Garland, Juan Merchan, Timothy Thibault et al.
How could you leave out the Vindmans, who framed up a congratulatory phone call as an attempt to extort Zelensky to produce fraudulent dirt on Joe Biden?
Hey Anonymous. It was just a short time ago when you were screaming for the release of the Epstein files. You seem to have gone completely silent now that the files have been released. Don’t you feel like you have been played as a sucker by your pack members in D.C.?
Well lo and behold Epstein contributed $182,000 to Democrats and only $18,000 to Republicans
Epstein was invited to attend a fund raising gig by Jeffries’ campaign in 2013 five years ofter Epstein was convicted of sex trafficking an underage child. Where oh where is your outrage now.
I guess that hot potato burned your hands so you dropped it. With or without your kind permission I present the receipts. https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/11/23/democrats-love-epstein/
Wait for it folks. Little Anonymous will bring a pack of little Anonymouses at me on the playground to say, Oh yah, well you’re just a poo poo head. I know that some who read the posts on this forum don’t click on links but if you’re interested in knowing the truth your time will be well spent. If a convicted pedophile gives the big bucks to the Democrats they just say come on in baby the waters at the island are just fine. They knew.
The files have not been released yet.
MAGAs are the dumbest shits on the planet.
Willis spent millions on this effort, wasted her office’s personnel, and cost the courts copious time and effort. Yet, even with the disclosures of her misconduct and the poor handling of the case, she was reelected.
Once again, Professor Turley attempts to save a fellow Democrat lawyer with faint criticism – the exact opposite of those who condemn by faint praise. Just as he did a few days ago, claiming there was no basis to disbar that other unindicted felon Democrat lawyer, Jack Smith.
Willis perjured herself in court – but you never even mentioned that, much less attempted an excuse for why it shouldn’t be seen as perjury.
Her Special Counsel (and fvck toy) going to Washington DC to consult with your friend Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Biden/Garland/Wray/Smith Arctic Frost team? Nope, nothing to see there worth mentioning either.
Just as there is nothing to see in the millions of taxpayer dollars that took her and her Special Counsel on their special little sex romps around the world. We can at least say that Hunter Biden wasn’t using public funds when Daddy Biden was funding his sex romps and porno channels.
All it takes for Democrat lawyer evil to succeed and continue is for somewhat good Democrat lawyers to say nothing. Just as we see here and saw two days ago with Jack Smith.
Look no further of her corrupt education than the crime family Clintoon. The “How to “ of government grifters.
This must be another mentally challenging day for our resident Democrat Internet Lawyer And Constitutional Expert, X, formerly George and now known as “Anonymous” (when daily re-posting Confederate Kluxxer constitutional theory and alternate Civil War history).
For years he provided us with his confident analysis that Willis would have Trump in an orange jump suit in a Georgia prison when we went to vote for Biden to be reelected in November of last year. And now – yet another George X disastrous failure of one of his Democrat legal analysis predictions!
Will George X avoid the issue by taking the day off, claiming Thanksgiving is too important for him to besmirch by showing up for work here today?
Or will he think that, if he just puts a few more hours into how to present this to us, he can come up with a brilliant post that will convince us that Turley is (as always) wrong and he is right – and Trump will be in a Georgia prison yet?
Turley– “At the end of the case, only the insanity remained.”
AND the remaining possibility that there was an actual conspiracy involving the Biden gang and Willis, James, Bragg and others. I should like that possibility to be investigated and cleared up one way or the other.
Don’t forget that Biden’s No. 3 man at Justice, Colangelo, left that lofty post to be a flunky for Alvin Bragg. Lo and behold, he’s working on the Trump prosecution.
I’m sure that this was a strategic career move, and not some sort of Get Trump conspiracy.
There is massive evidence of political bias in the Trump prosecutions. As well as conspiracy.
But what matters most is whether there was a sound foundation to charge a crime.
It is the absence of even reasonable suspicion – much less probable cause that makes the prosecution “abuse of rights under color of law” – a crime, and it is the absence of facts establishing a crime that is why the lawfare against Trump is actually a crime itself.
It is OK to go after your political enemies – but you should be much more sure than normal there is a real crime
Otherwise YOU are the one committing the crime.
One of the major points Skandalakis makes is that you have to guess at the motives of various actors to get anywhere near a criminal act.
Those opposed to the lawfare against Trump can not do the same.
Comey’s motives are not relevant, James motives are not relevant, all the others that Trump is being accused of politically targetting just as he was politically targeted, have one very significant difference.
The core to Trump’s alleged vendetta is FACTS. Comey lied under oath, Comey leaked classified information. James lied on sworn documents to banks and the govenrment committing mortgage fraud as well as insurance fraud.
The facts are well established, those facts PROVE crimes. They do not require guesses ast to the motives of those involved.
We can likely guess at the motives, but it does not matter whether that guess is right or wrong – the acts alleged and easily proven are in themselves crimes regardless of motive.
Juries tend to want to hear the motive for committing a crime.
But few acts are crimes only because you had a bad motive.
A crime, is a crime is a crime regardless of why you committed it.
We should be far more careful when prosecuting political enemies to dot the i’s and cross the t’s
but making yourself someone’s political enemy does not make you immune from prosecution.
A allegedly bad motive does not make a legal act a crime.
We can argue Trump’s motives – but he committed no crimes.
If you are on the left you can delude yourself into beleiving his motives are all evil.
If you are on the right you can pretend they are all saintly.
But it is ACTS that determine whether something is a crime.
There are a long long list of those on the left whose motives are clear and clearly immoral.
They should all be prosecuted – IF and ONLY IF there acts constitute crimes.
*. DJT is turning out to be a Christ-like archetype, a human sacrifice upon whom all the sins of US are heaped. The motive? All the sins must be paid, sins are crimes against humanity and nature. The sacrifice is crazy isn’t it.
“Comey lied under oath, Comey leaked classified information. James lied on sworn documents to banks and the govenrment committing mortgage fraud as well as insurance fraud.”
The unfortunate fact is that neither did any of that.
That is why true professionals and experienced prosecutors would not pursue the charges. Halligan is an incompetent lawyer chosen by Trump because she looks good. Not because she’s smart or knows what she’s doing.
“The unfortunate fact is that neither did any of that.”
ATS that is an absol;utely Stupid claim.
We have Comey.s testimony before congress in 2017 and 2020
He was asked directly whethere he leaked information both about specific cases and more generally and he denied doing so.
He was asked whether he authorized others to leak – and he denied doing so.
He was asked whether he provided others within the govenrment material to leaks – and denied doing so.
He was asked if he was aware of leaks by those in government – and he denied any knowlege.
But his OWN EMAIL confirm that he provided information to Special Government Employee (and personal friend) Richamnd with the expectation that he would leak that information, and was informed by Richmand later that he had leaked some of what was provided to him, and Comey congradulated him on doing so.
Further Comey was found with confidential and classified information in his home – after he was fired and he provided that information to others who were not part of government.
Again there is ZERO debate about any of this.
You can argue for jury nullification or many other things – you can not argue lack of evidence.
The MOMENT you claim lack of evidence – you prove yourself to be a moron.
“That is why true professionals and experienced prosecutors would not pursue the charges.”
ROFL – really ? Tell that to General Flynn or Papadoulis or Stone or Manafort, or Bannon, or the over a thousand people who peacefully marched through the capital on J6 2021 or those you prosecuted who were not even present.
Tell that to Mueller and Smith and the other federal prosecutors Who went after the VICTIMS rather than the perpitrators of a HOAX that they KNEW was a HOAX before they open an investigation. A Hoax that they investigated and prosecuted for 8 years.
It is your True professionals and expereniced prosecutors who time after time drug people into criminal court and oftern convicted them based on the worst political HOAX in US history and they KNEW they were shilling a hoax from the start.
Your “True Professionals and expereniced prosecutors” are CRIMINALS.
Who should all be charged – as the LA police in the Rodney King case for violating citizens individuals rights under color of law.
“Halligan is an incompetent lawyer chosen by Trump because she looks good. Not because she’s smart or knows what she’s doing.”
She was appointed with only a bit more than a week left on the Statute of limitations for Comey.
She was able to gather the evidence, present it to a grand jury and get them to vote a True bill on 2 of three counts.
And she did that in a very democratic district with a Grand Jury likely full of Democrat Federal employees or their freinds and families.
Halligan is quite obviously EXTREMELY competent.
Assuming that as Judge Currie claims she was not properly appointed – it would not have mattered if Trump had Appointed Thurgood Marshall,
This BTW is one of the significant factors that will result in Currie being overturned on appeal.
Curries decided not that Halligan could not be appointed – but that Once Siebert was fired NO ONE could be appointed that would indict Comey and James
Do you really think that SCOTUS is going top read “ONLY” into a law that does not have ONLY anywhere, as Currie did, when the consequence of that would be the position must be left vacant and the Statue of limitations for multiple crimes must be allowed to run out ?
I pray for a return to normalcy and rid of the game show we have been seeing among supposedly enforcers of our constitution and system of laws.
Danley Wolfe, Lewis Center, OH
As the next casebooks are being written for law schools, Lawfare as a standalone topic appeals to rigorous legal thinking. Maybe as a hub and spoke assembly reaching out to constitutional law, ethics, criminal and civil procedure to suggest a few. Lawfare by any political group defeats the whole objective of the exercise of being the United States of America. That said, may your Thanksgiving be as happy as can be.
Mike we all talk about Lawfare – but all that really means is the rule of man not law or the abandonment of the rule of law.
What was Wrong with the cases targeting Trump ? The same thing wrong with the whole collusion delusion nonsense.
There was not even reasonable suspicion of a crime or that Trump committed a crime.
The standard to indict and prosecute is probable cause – reasonable suspicion is the standard for an investigation.
Conversely – as many of us grasped in 2019, and by now almost all of us should grasp – there was plenty of reasonable suspcion that Hunter and Joe Biden were corrupt.
It is not using the law to go after your political enemies that is the core problem – it is using the law to go after your political enemies when you KNOW they are INNOCENT.
Where is Dennis? He claimed time and time again that Fani would spank Trump’s fanny and have him in a orange jumpsuit by the end of the summer. Here we are, over a year later and Trump is not in a orange jumpsuit but sitting in the Oval Office. Again.
Dennis was last seen donning an ‘Anonymous’ jumpsuit. It has been a trying time punctuated by numerous unrealized aspirations for the little fella.
He was last seen working as a temp for hire Walmart Greater for the Holiday season.
Dennis’s only position as qualified would be Walmart Men’s room attendant, cleaning up after the unwashed masses. A stain cleaning a stain…
From the annals of the Political Warfare (Playbook) it’s understandable from the Democrat’s perspective that One would “Fight Fire with Fire”, hence the Georgia Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Election Commission took it upon themselves to use ‘Lawfair as a Defense in the disguise of a Persecution’ against the Republican Party. Their use of a frivolous lawsuit and Media Theatrics (the Booking of Donald J. Trump) were not withstanding the National impact of the MAGA Republican Party.
As the raw story of the DNC and D-State Players (Comey, Brennen, Obama, Clinton, Biden-Admin, …) comes to light, the dirty politics that were played (in all: i.e. Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg, Letitia James, …) are to be stifled. So in the interest of The State of Georgia and Fulton County, Director Peter Skandalakis, Executive Director, Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia, Criminal Justice Coordinating Council – sought that it best to “Make This Thing Go Away” (That’s a No-Brainer).
In all the D-State won this battle and the Americn People lost, whilst Character Actors (Lawyers, Pundits, Media, Politicians) along the sidelines made money Pundit-Penning ‘The Wild Goose Chase’.
An immerse Interactive Thriller for Everybody – a ongoing Political Media Lollapalooza event.
(It’s sickening that this is what the ‘American-Way’ has come down to).
Thank God this chapter is over.
Ref.:
Dir. Peter Skandalakis
Executive Director, Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia
https://cjcc.georgia.gov/director-peter-skandalakis
As if cockroaches were actually human.