This week, the world lost one of the most iconic actresses in history: Brigitte Bardot. It was a terribly sad moment for many moviegoers. However, for the free speech community, the death also brought one of the most bitter and hypocritical moments as French President Emmanuel Macron heralded Bardot as someone who “embodied a life of freedom.” As discussed repeatedly on this blog, Bardot was repeatedly prosecuted by the French government for exercising her free speech.
Bardot died at the age of 91 after spending a lifetime fighting for animal and free speech rights. That latter struggle led her repeatedly into conflict with the French government, which has long embraced wide-ranging censorship of its citizens. Macron himself is a distinctly anti-free-speech figure, despite the warm reception he received in past years from American politicians and the media.
Most recently, Macron expressed outrage at the sanctions imposed on notorious censors, including his anti-free-speech ally Thierry Breton.
Bardot rocketed to fame in 1956 with And God Created Woman, leading to a slew of other movies that highlighted her transcendent beauty. She then retired at a relatively young age and fought for animal rights. She was also a critic of what she saw as threats to the French culture from immigration, Islamic influences, and homosexuality. Many of us disagreed with some of those views, but she was exercising core rights of political speech.
Bardot once said, “I am greatly misunderstood by politically correct idiots. Politics disgusts me.”
Macron’s praise for Bardot’s “life of freedom” is reminiscent of the reaction of French officials to the massacre of editors at Charlie Hebdo, a satirical magazine. After hounding the victims for years with criminal investigations, the French government organized a march for free speech. As predicted, it then used the killing by Islamic extremists to further crack down on free speech.
Since then, France has been a leader in the rollback of free speech in the West, with ever-widening laws curtailing free speech. These laws criminalize speech under vague standards referring to “inciting” or “intimidating” others based on race or religion. For example, fashion designer John Galliano has been found guilty in a French court on charges of making anti-Semitic comments against at least three people in a Paris bar. At his sentencing, Judge Anne Marie Sauteraud read out a list of the bad words used by Galliano to Geraldine Bloch and Philippe Virgitti, including using ‘dirty whore” in criticism.
In another case, the father of French conservative presidential candidate Marine Le Pen was fined because he had called people from the Roma minority “smelly.” A French teenager was charged for criticizing Islam as a “religion of hate.”
This is a nation that still echoes the cry of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity (“liberté, égalité, fraternité”). However, in today’s France, “liberté” is no longer valued. Individual rights of religion and speech are routinely sacrificed in the name of “equity” and “fraternity.”
In my book The Indispensable Right, I discuss how free speech is in a virtual free fall in Europe. As we face our own growing anti-free speech movement, citizens need to take a long look at countries like France to see what awaits us down this path. Europe went down this slippery slope of censorship decades ago, and the desire to silence others has now become an insatiable appetite.
Marcon has supported figures like Breton in globalizing the reach of the infamous Digital Services Act (DSA) to curtail speech, including Americans and American companies. Bardot was the target of such laws, and Macron’s government consistently and vigorously denied her effort to live a “life of freedom” in France.
Whether you were supportive or appalled by Bardot’s political views, she was unyielding in her demand to speak freely. She was the ultimate contrarian, even saying once “I have a slight despising for humanity in general.”
Emmanuel Macron has now made me understand why Bardot preferred the company of her animals.
Professor Turley, Excellent Touché…! Here we are 80 years after Victor Laszlo stole the show in Rick’s Cafe Americain singing “La Marseillaise…” ..to-day he would be shocked by the possibility that his beloved France has now replaced the ‘Drittes Reich’ totalitarian regime with a new French version………..
That French motto of, “liberté, égalité, fraternité” began in the French Revolution, when the French emphatically did not believe in the liberty of the aristocrats and royals whom they murdered, including every child they could catch.
Today, France continues to proclaim itself a bastion of freedom, while persecuting French like the late Brigitte Bardot, for speech contrary to the State party line.
Turley is complaining about France suppressing free speech? What about Trump: 1. demanding that the FCC pull the broadcast licenses of mainstream media when they don’t publish flattering things about him, when they point out his his endless string of lies, the Epstein scandal, all of the court losses and his historically-incompetent cabinet?; 2. getting Jimmy Kimmel kicked off of the air because he didn’t like him mocking him?; 3. the Pentagon kicking out any media that refused to sign an agreement that they would only publish items approved first by the administration?; 4. suing various media and then “settling” with them and allowing mergers that would otherwise not be approved? What a joke!
What about Obama and Biden and their little game-playing with free speech? IRS investigations; the pressure put on social media companies to censor or bury dissident information, the Hunter laptop joke, the Great Barrington Declaration; the Missouri v. Biden loss for Biden
https://www.freedom-research.org/p/ending-federal-censorship-in-the
“CLAIM: Obama cares about free speech and is standing up against the Trump administration’s supposed censorship.
VERDICT: FALSE. Obama not only attacked Fox News, but encouraged social media censorship as recently as 2022.
Former President Barack Obama claimed last week to be a champion of free speech against what he said were threats from President Donald Trump — ignoring his own history of support for censorship and attacking alternative media.”
https://citizensforfreespeech.org/fact-check-obama-who-backed-censorship-claims-to-be-free-speech-champion/
What a joke! Ditto.
Anonymous at 2:47 pm –
1) This is focusing on words rather than action. Trump said that some media outlets should have their licenses revoked. He did not actually attempt to revoke any licenses.
2) He played no role in the temporary suspension of Kimmel. Kimmel got what he deserved.
3) The Defense Secretary was seeking to prevent the leaking of information from the Pentagon to the media, not the substance of what the media said.
4) He has sued media for defamatory remarks, at least as he sees their statements. This is not censorship.
Wow, you seem to have a problem with the truth. I am not going to set you straight – i don’t have that kind of time. Suffice it to say, you need help.
This is a venue for informed discussion, not for parroting the musings of the women on The VIew. You’re now excused from the room.
We should never forget Vichy.
I heard early news of Bardot’s death on NBC News, -which quite specifically stated to its audience that during Bardot’s life, she was “criticized for her far right-wing views.” I was surprised that such a comment would be part of an announcement about her passing. -Same thing on NPR mid-day. (This was eliminated from later announcements.)
I don’t recall NBC or NPR announcing Rob Reiner’s death by stating that he was known for his far-left views.
I wonder what P:rof. Turley thinks of the Apple TV series “Pluribus”, which seems to offer advice on social regulation of speech. Maybe, too, what did Brigitte Bardot think of it?
Clinton committed treason when he sold top secret satellite technology to China—for campaign contributions.
The radical Left Wingers condemned the guy and insisted he be prosecuted!
lol
Have you ever heard/seen/read big media refer to themselves or anyone else as “Leftists” or “left wingers”?
President Clinton approved waivers allowing U.S. companies Loral Space & Communications and Hughes Electronics to launch their commercial satellites on Chinese rockets. In 1996, the administration also shifted the authority for licensing commercial satellite exports from the security-focused State Department to the commerce-oriented Commerce Department, a move that loosened controls.
Campaign Contributions: Bernard Schwartz, CEO of Loral, donated large amounts of money to Democrats. A Democratic fundraiser, Johnny Chung, also testified he funneled over $100,000 from Liu Chao-ying, a Chinese military official and aerospace executive, to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) that influenced national security decisions.
In the 1990s Bernard Schwartz, CEO of Loral, was the single largest individual contributor to the Democratic Party.
Did you notice how Clinton was charged with treason? Or, how the BM condemned Clinton and hounded him night and day, insisting he tell the truth about selling top secret technology to Communist China?
Our BM is complicit in treason. They should be charged and prosecuted.
Hughes Electronics launched its commercial satellites on Chinese rockets. They helped China analyze failed launches, transferring sensitive missile technology and violating U.S. export laws. Both Loral Space & Communications and Hughes helped improve Chinese rocket reliability.
“Clearly, Trump does not want it publicly known that he was an FBI informant. From my experience as a prosecutor, the principal way a person becomes a confidential informant is when the FBI uses a person’s involvement in criminal activity to turn the individual into an informant to avoid prosecution,” Akerman writes.
It’s the tip of the iceberg of corruption in Minnesota where untold billions have been stolen by unassimilable Somali and other invading parasites.
They don’t get away with that in China.
____________________________________________
AI Overview
Yes, Chinese officials have been executed for corruption, notably high-profile cases like former finance chief Lai Xiaomin (executed 2021 for massive bribes) and ex-food drug director Zheng Xiaoyu (executed 2007 for bribery and tainted products), demonstrating China’s strong stance against graft under Xi Jinping, though the death penalty for corruption is rare and reserved for egregious cases like vast bribery or endangering public health.
. Try trillions stolen. The money has been converted into other accounts, countries, property and the cash is or will worthless ashes. Try 35 trillion stolen. They been or were printing money out the treasury under Barry and lunch bucket 24/7.
True scum
^^^^ and Clinton, Bush and maybe Trump. Is anything good?
She was the ultimate contrarian, even saying once “I have a slight despising for humanity in general.”
A Jesuit English poet of some renown would have disagreed. Hopefully Bardot found joy in her latter years.
Pied Beauty
Glory be to God for dappled things –
For skies of couple-colour as a brinded cow;
For rose-moles all in stipple upon trout that swim;
Fresh-firecoal chestnut-falls; finches’ wings;
Landscape plotted and pieced – fold, fallow, and plough;
And áll trádes, their gear and tackle and trim.
All things counter, original, spare, strange;
Whatever is fickle, freckled (who knows how?)
With swift, slow; sweet, sour; adazzle, dim;
He fathers-forth whose beauty is past change:
Praise him.
– Gerard Manley Hopkins, SJ
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/44399/pied-beauty
Between Trump suing, and media mergers being scrutinized by the administration, we’re quickly catching up with France.
don’t see the connection here. But you do you.
The Trump admin stopped public funding to media. US law prohibits restricting media (although both Obama and Biden disregarded that). Your attempt to create a straw man falls very flat.
Why should U.S. taxpayers fund state media? NPR ratings keep dropping. Some of their highly rated shows are gone. On PBS TV. They keep showing 1983 movie War Games. You can see that on AMC or Turner Channel. PBS was outstanding 1960′-80s. Now many shows are 10 year old repeats! They need to reinvent themselves. Maybe stream.
Agree with other commenter. That’s a bizarre comment with no basis in reality.
https://www.themorningchronicle.net/
BOO HOO TDS INFECTED ANON!!!
Your comment makes no sense. A person who commences a civil lawsuit alleging defamation is not the same as the government shutting down free speech. The tort system in the United States is designed to allow tort victims to be compensated by people who injured them. FWIW, it’s much easier to get compensated for defamation in England than in the US.
Second, the government scrutinizes mergers based on antitrust laws. Those laws are designed to promote competition by making sure one or a few companies cannot completely dominate a field and suppress competition. They promote economic freedom, they don’t hinder it.
Perhaps you are a false-flag commenter, just trying to make Trump-haters look silly or stupid (?)
OMG! Where to start. Start here: Where the —- is the Supreme Court?
Defamation is unconstitutional, as it denies Americans their absolute and unqualified 1st Amendment freedom of speech.
The tort system is unconstitutional, as it denies Americans their absolute and unqualified 1st Amendment freedom of speech.
Mergers are part and parcel of the absolute right of only the owner to “claim and exercise” dominion over private property.
Congress enjoys the power to regulate only commerce, that is, the “buying and selling” of commodities, products, services, et al., among nations, states, and Indian tribes—Congress has no power to regulate the design, engineering, manufacture, marketing, or any other aspect or facet of the process of bringing a product to market and selling it.
Antitrust laws are unconstitutional, constituting a denial of freedom, free enterprise, free industries, and free markets in the private sector.
Antitrust laws are unconstitutional denials of the absolute right to private property—private property is not public property, and ONLY the owner may “claim and exercise” dominion.
The word “INTERPRET” does not exist in the Constitution; the judicial branch has no power to modify, amend, or modify fundamental or statutory law by “interpretation,” and the judicial branch enjoys ONLY the judicial power and no executive power—it may ONLY issue an opinion or decision regarding whether actions comport with law.
Defamation unconstitutional? That’s a joke. Do you also think laws criminalizing fraud or terroristic threats are unconstitutional?
More generally, have you ever attended law school? Do you know anything about law and the constitution? It seems not. You are the type of commenter who hears some whacked-out teaching on a whacko website and believes it’s more trustworthy than the Constitution and Supreme Court, and then trumpets your ignorance for all the world to see. I have been practicing law for nearly 30 years and have dealt with both constitutional law and tort law extensively. I have dealt with hundreds of court cases on these topics. I don’t rely on whackos to get my understanding of law. By contrast, your ignorance shines through with every word you type.
Can you read?
__________________
1st Amendment
Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech….
It’s going to be a hard day for oldmanfromkansas with this anonymous trying to move it without all the slop slipping through his fingers.
Can *you* read? Where in that text prohibiting Congress from making certain laws does it mention private defamation lawsuits brought by private individuals in state courts?
Well, they’re PUBLIC courts. Does anyone else grow weary of it. Move to private courts for civil private civil suits. The public has an interest in criminal charges. Ild man not from Kansas.
The Epstein suits should reimburse the public for using the courts. He was criminally prosecuted and got a death penalty. The public has no interest beyond that. The criminal., CRIME only. What a racket.
“Well, they’re PUBLIC courts. Does anyone else grow weary of it. Move to private courts for civil private civil suits. The public has an interest in criminal charges.”
Only Govenrment has the constitutional power to take your rights from you.
YOU claimed rights are absolute – absolutely most libertarians and manyh conservatives want strong protections of our rights.
But rights are NOT absolute. When you murder someone – your freedom can be taken away BY GOVERNMENT.
The Social Contract is litterally individuals ceding the right to use FORCE except for defense of self and others, in return for the governmetn being empowered to use force to protect us from and punish the use of FORCE to infringe on our rights.
Private courts only excercise powers we Voluntarily give them.
You have to agree to arbitration or mediation. I fully support broad use of private courts to resolve many many disputes. But private courts have ZERO power that parties do not voluntarily cede to them.
Public – Government courts not only punish crimes by taking away rights by FORCE.
But they are also responsible to adjudicate binding agreements by FORCE.
If you sell a person a home – you can not take the money and refuse to turn over the home.
It is the civil court system that FORCES you to meet obligations that you accepted voluntarily.
Private Courts can not do that unless you agree to allow them too. No one who KNOWS they abridged a contract would agree to arbitration or mediation unless the threat of a public court existed.
Tort law is the law that specifies that if your actions case actual and direct harm to another, that you can be FORCED to make them whole. Defamation is just one of Many torts.
I would eliminate Defamation as a tort – not because it violates the first amendment but because it is too subjective and to easily abused.
An example of a tort would be if you dump toxic chemicals on your property and they leach into the ground and poison the ground water in properties adjacent to yours.
Are you going to say that Government can not punish you for that ?
Anonymous – If I direct another to murder you – is that constitutionally protected free speech ?
Omfk, by whom was the unsigned opinion , Trump v. Illinois written? A clerk?
So exactly who is the arbitrary controller of speech?
Which words may be spoken and which not, Karl?
Where does American fundamental law state that it exists solely for attorneys at law and that the clear English language cannot be assimilated by the hoi polloi—that they can’t read the Constitution but they can vote?
That you don’t like the Constitution does not bear.
Quote for me, please, the clear English language in the Constitution that says private individuals may not recover compensation for tortious harm done to them via defamation. You cannot quote it because it doesn’t exist. But you’re too ignorant to realize that you don’t know what the f—k you’re talking about, anonymous troll. It’s little wonder you post your garbage anonymously.
I’m a different anon. No offense, but isn’t “okdmanfromkansas” anonymous?
People must adapt to freedom.
Freedom does not adapt to people.
Dictatorship does.
When you run out of ammunition, go ad hominem. Good choice. Well played.
Well, either a civil suit or duel at sunrise.
“Defamation is unconstitutional, as it denies Americans their absolute and unqualified 1st Amendment freedom of speech.”
I agree that we should eliminate defamation as a tort. But not because it is unconstitutional – it is not.
Many things that govenrment is forbidded from doing are not violations of your rights if done privately.
You may not say whatever you wish in someone else’s home.
Your employer can prohibit you from bringing a gun to work.
You may not protest in someones front yard.
Your excercise of your rights can not come at the expense of the rights of others.
“The tort system is unconstitutional, as it denies Americans their absolute and unqualified 1st Amendment freedom of speech.”
Torts is a core part of the legitimate role of govenrment. It is the actual regulation that is constitutional.
Government may not a priori tell you what you can and can not do.
But if what you do harms others THEY can go to court and require that you make them whole for the ACTUAL and DIRECT harm that you caused.
Your right to free speech does not include the right to direct others who you have control over to commit a crime. The person who orders a murder is as guilty as the person who commits the murder.
I would elminiate defmation as a tort because it is too easily abused, too subjective, and ultimately unnecescary – the free market does a better job of holding people accountable ultimately for lies.
“Mergers are part and parcel of the absolute right of only the owner to “claim and exercise” dominion over private property.”
While your claim is wrong – the FTC and FCC are unconstitutional and worse ineffective.
CBS killing their piece on the Venezuelans sent to El Salvador is a clear example of Trump era intimidation
https://www.themorningchronicle.net
Like CBS is afraid of Trump? Like that’s stopped the left-wing MSM from ever publishing a negative story on Trump? How about: CBS doctored the tapes and then the head of CBS, Bari Weiss, who is more committed to journalistic integrity, pulled the story because it amounted to fabrication and journalistic malpractice.
I don’t want any more news about Venezuela or central America. 3rd worlds must be cut off.
So CBS on their own requires a reporter who is known for poor even false journalism from running a story that is essentially identical to one that was already run previously and that is somehow Trump violating free speech ?
Regardless Bari Weiss – no fan of Trump and absolutely NOT a MAGA conservative was brought in to CBS for the explicit purpose of restoring journalistic integrity and restoring the credibility of a once respected media outlet that no longer is trusted by 2/3 of people.
The alternative to Weiss trying to restore Balance to CBS is CBS failing – going bankrupt because too few people wish to watch what CBS spews.
Get over yourself, this is happening – not just at CBS but throughout MSM – either they are going to regain the trust of most Americans or they are going bankrupt.
Weiss was correct – Americans do not need a rehash of the CECOT story.
They already KNOW that Trump uses the AEA to deport alleged criminal TdA members to El Salvador where they are imprisoned. Those on the left do not like this. But the majority of americans do not have a problem with it.
Weiss killed a story that was no more than a rehash of a prior story that people have already heard and decided that most of them do not care about.
Free speech DOES means that you can rant over and over about things others do not care about.
It does not mean that people must listen or pay you to do so.
The killing of the CECOT story was about whether CBS survives. It is about Whether what CBS says interests more than the tiny number of viewers that are insufficient to keep it from bankruptcy.
oldmanfromkansas, my reply at 7:12pm was not intended to be anonymous. I’m new to this comment format…somewhat ironic to be debating free speech with people who feel the need to be either anonymous or use a pseudonym. I find the Trump administration at the very least using intimidation.
Intimidation, you say???!!!
What the —- did “Crazy Abe” use in a situation where secession was not prohibited and fully constitutional per the 10th Amendment while it was expressed in the constitutional ratification documents of a number of states?
I mean, he killed a million Americans by the time all was said and done.
Oh, and for what, exactly—nothing different from a husband beating his wife into submission when she wants to leave and obtain a divorce?
Anonymous actually lessens bias.
MM – anonymity is a constitutionally protected free speech right. There is no irony in posting anonymously.
But the excercise of rights often comes with private consequences – if you speak the truth – your reputation and credibility grow. If you lie you lose credibility.
When you chose to speak anonymously you speech without any established reputation or credibility.
Speaking anonymously is a right.
What is ironic is that so many here post anonymously and beleive their are entitled to respect and credibility.
The only posted LESS credible than an anonymous poster is one who has established a reputation for lying.
Credibility is a product of the post – not the poster.
“I find the Trump administration at the very least using intimidation.”
Which is just another reason for disempowering government – for limited govenrment.
Trump and FCC chair Carr called out Kimmel for a blatant lie.
I absolutely support the right of anyone – including presidents to point out the lies told by others.
What they may NOT do is use govenrment power to supress free speech – even lies.
Did Trump and Carr intimidate anyone ? I think the answer is no. Sinclair and Nexstar and even Iger acted before Carr or Trump said anything. Further Sinclair, Nestar, and Iger SHOULD HAVE ACTED.
Kimmel defamed 45% of the country. That is absolutely NOT the way to build ratings and get out of the red.
Frankly Kimmel should have been fired and his contract should have been canceled.
Not just for that remark – That remark merely exposed that Kimmel was more interested in defaming people he disagreed with than increasing his appeal and actually making his show a success.
Regardless, Kimmel’s remark was false, outrageous and defamatory, anbd deserved condemnation – including by Trump and Carr.
The real solution is not to preclude Trump’s remarks. Everyone – including he president should be allowed to express outrage at outrageous remarks.
What should not be possible is for GOVERNMENT to punish speech – outrageous or not.
Todate there is no evidence that Trump has ever used Govenrment to do so.
While it is unquestioned that the Obama and Biden administrations did exactly that in numerous ways.
They may have done so more quietly, but they also did so far more egregiously and in clear violation of the first amendment.
OMFK – Both the FTC and the FCC are unconstitutional.
Worse still they are ineffective. There was massive economic work done on anti-trust law in the last half of the 20th century. Anti-Trust law is a failure. The so called Trusts it seeks to Thwart do not actually work in the way the Trust busters claimed they did.
Further both are subject to abuse. Trump is not alone as a president who has threatened to use FCC or AntiTrust powers to intimidate businesses politically, nor are his threats the most egregious.
Nor is their credible evidence that those Threats were ever effectuated.
But they are still wrong.
And the easiest way to eliminate that is to eliminate the FTC and FCC.
Let the president say whatever he pleases.
Antitrust laws “promote economic freedom, they don’t hinder it.”
That is false.
Those grotesquely unjust laws punish a company that excels at exercising their economic freedom — which they do by being productive and by engaging in voluntary trade.
Tell it to Visa and Master Card, they have monopolized to control 80% of the market, impose higher rates for small businesses, block competition and bring in 50% profits with the average percentage interest charged at 27.9%. Antitrust laws are specifically intended to prevent this type of predatory practices.
“Tell it to . . .”
Easy, free market solution: Don’t be a customer.
It’s globalization. Who’s behind it some wonder.
As western civilization has been invaded and cultures replaced, Europe is no more and the United States is just part of the Americas leaving behind its in its connection to Britain shards and rubble. First world’s no longer as 3rd worlds change names to emerging markets , developing countries squash civilization. As women have become pregnant people looking more like men or drag queens or shrouded ghosts hysterical, gesticulating figures or silent in tyranny.
It’s the darkest time…Who’s behind it?
“It’s the [women], stupid!”
– James Carville
___________________
The American fertility rate has been in a “death spiral” for lo these many decades; American women bear nowhere near enough babies.
If men have a duty to fight a nation’s wars, do women not have a duty to make a nation’s people?
^^^ East Indian women have approximately 7 children per family. 1.5 billion east indian people currently? China and India are nearly half of the world population. They’ll need to consume more land so invasions are predictable. The mindless propagation continues.
Typically nature takes care of overpopulation with famine, disease and pestilence.
ATS – If you defame another person – if you tell lies about them that harm their reputation – you can be sued, and you will have to pay damages.
That is not a violation of free speech.
Those of you on the left have tried to sue Alex Jones into oblivion for bogus claims of defamation.
You have been happy with similar claims against Giuliani and Trump.
You were fine regarding the defamation claim against Fox by Smartmatic – even though increasingly the evidence is that Smartmatic systems can be rigged in the ways claimed. Further FOX did not make the defamation claims,
Guests did. In Trump’s claims against ABC, CBS, CNN, BBC the false claims were made by the network, not guests.
Trump should have won the Billion dollar Defamation claim against Hillary Clinton for the Collusion Delusion, but a Clinton appointed judge in FL Sanctioned him for making the claim.
Trump did win the defamation claim against Stormy Daniels.
While I would personally get rid of Defamation as a tort – it is way too subjective and too easily abused.
It is not a violation of your free speech rights to require you to pay damages of you CLEARLY publish lies that harm other people.
ON MACRON. In the toolkit of every politician to extol the virtues of all manor of rights and freedoms, yet deny them all when power is achieved. The clever ones find a balance. The evil ones use a gun. The mediocre ones, like Macron, try to fool all the people all the time. (Homage to Lincoln)
So says the anon commenter who never had a job in the French government. Or any federal government. Really stupid comment.
President Trump, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel can you please let the American people know when the political criminals that have squandered our National wealth, corrupted our judicial system, weaponized our law enforcement agencies and fraudulently stole an election in a seditious and treasonous conspiracy in an attempted coup to transform OUR Nation into something of their own ideology. Sometimes you may have to break a few eggs to make an omelette.
When?!
“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”
– Barack Obama
____________________
“We will stop him.”
– Peter Strzok to FBI paramour Lisa Page
_____________________________________________
“[Obama] wants to know everything we’re doing.”
– Lisa Page to FBI paramour Peter Strzok
_____________________________________________
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before 40.”
– Peter Strzok to FBI parmour Lisa Page
____________________________________________
“People on the 7th floor to include Director are fired up about this [Trump] server.”
– Bill Priestap
_________________
“I had a discussion with the case team and we believe there to be predication to include former President of the United States Donald J. Trump as a predicated subject.”
– Timothy Thibault to John Crabb, U.S. Attorney’s Office, D.C.
___________________________________________________________________
The Obama Coup D’etat in America is the most egregious abuse of power and the most prodigious crime in American political history. The co-conspirators are:
Kevin Clinesmith, Bill Taylor, Eric Ciaramella, Rosenstein, Mueller/Team, Andrew Weissmann,
James Comey, Christopher Wray, McCabe, Strozk, Page, Laycock, Kadzic, Sally Yates,
James Baker, Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr, Priestap, Kortan, Campbell, Sir Richard Dearlove,
Christopher Steele, Simpson, Joseph Mifsud, Alexander Downer, Stefan “The Walrus” Halper,
Azra Turk, Kerry, Hillary, Huma, Mills, Brennan, Gina Haspel, Clapper, Lerner, Farkas, Power,
Lynch, Rice, Jarrett, Holder, Brazile, Sessions (patsy), Nadler, Schiff, Pelosi, Obama,
Joe Biden, James E. Boasberg, Emmet Sullivan, Gen. Milley, George Soros, John McCain,
Marc Elias, Igor Danchenko, Fiona Hill, Charles H. Dolan, Jake Sullivan, Strobe Talbot,
Cody Shear, Victoria Nuland, Ray “Red Hat” Epps, Don Berlin, Kathy Ruemmler, Rodney Joffe,
Paul Vixie, L. Jean Camp, Andrew Whitney, Lisa O. Monaco, Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg,
Matthew Colangelo, Merrick Garland, Juan Merchan, Timothy Thibault et al.
A good start!
Another garbage comment.
Such a profound and compelling refutation.
It’s a good comment. Many have perished.
So it seems. Who’s behind it?