Michael Cohen is back.
The disbarred lawyer has spent a lifetime marketing his curious skill set: a moral and ethical flexibility that allows him to do things that others would find revolting. A legal thug who threatened students, journalists, and others on behalf of his former client. He then turned against Trump to cut a deal for himself after being criminally charged for fraudulent conduct. He has now turned against the New York prosecutors who sought to rehabilitate him to prosecute Trump.
For full disclosure, I have been a critic of Cohen for years, dating back to his time as a thug for Donald Trump, when I chastised the New York bar for failing to act against him. While the media once despised Cohen, he became a darling of the press when he turned against Trump.
Cohen’s North Star has always been pure, unadulterated self-interest. Neither loyalty nor decency has deterred Cohen from making false statements or serving the interests of his changing patrons.
His conduct as an attorney was a disgrace to the bar for years, as he gamed the system for his own benefit. Michael Cohen was long known as the “fixer” for former President Trump — a legal thug who threatened students, journalists, and others on behalf of his former client.
His signature has been to threaten lawsuits against critics. He even sued Trump and failed.
When his fraudulent business conduct led to criminal charges, it was clear that he was again entertaining best offers. Cohen reinvented himself as a redemptive sinner and received financial support from Trump critics.
Throughout this process and after his conviction, he continued to be accused of lying.
He claimed urgent medical needs for release from prison. Of course, he previously claimed health problems for failing to appear to testify, only to be spotted out on the town for a fancy dinner.
During the Trump trial, Cohen was again accused of lying. He spent two days insisting that he had been a liar but had lied to help former President Donald Trump.
Cohen has lied to Congress, courts, special counsels, the IRS, the banks, and virtually every creature that walks or crawls on the face of the Earth.
Notably, his past convictions for business and tax fraud were not taken in Trump’s interest but in his own. When he admitted on the stand that he lied during his prior plea agreement, it was to advance his own interests.
Cohen has now continued this pattern of shifting loyalties and turned on New York Attorney General Letitia James and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, accusing them of pressuring him to frame his testimony to guarantee Trump’s conviction.
After Trump’s recent court victories and the remanding of his federal case, Cohen is claiming that the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and the New York Attorney General’s Office “pressured and coerced” him into tailoring testimony: “I felt pressured and coerced only to provide information and testimony that would satisfy the government’s desire to build the cases against and secure a judgment and convictions against President Trump.”
The posting led some to speculate that Cohen is again marketing his availability to the highest bidder. Whatever the reason, his statement clearly undermines his former allies as they struggle to preserve what remains of their prior prosecutions.
Cohen remains the personification of the old fable of the scorpion and frog. In the fable, a scorpion convinced a leery frog to carry him across a river, noting that he could not sting him since they would both drown. Halfway across, the scorpion struck, and the frog asked why he would doom them both. The scorpion replied, “I am sorry, but I couldn’t resist the urge. It’s in my nature.”
James and Bragg just felt that all-too-familiar sting from Michael Cohen.
There have always been Cohens. Nothing new under the sun.
It is not new that a president was so corrupt that he needed to pay for the services of a lawyer-thug.
It is not new that a president was so corrupt that he needed to pay for the services of a lawyer-thug.
Pre-Trump: Eric Holder, Jack Smith, James Comey, Robert Mueller, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Louis Lerner, Lisa Monaco… etc. The entire Obama/Biden crime cartel of lawyer-thugs busily in action prior to Trump ever announcing his run for president.
Your move, Tovarisch…
Cohen sounds like a reincarnation of Titus Oates.
“Cohen sounds like a reincarnation of Titus Oates.”
Pretty good analogy. There is one important difference, though. A plausible case could be made that ignorance of facts attributable the ineffectiveness of communications at the time allowed Oates to continue to get away with his outrageous behavior: evading charges in Hastings by fleeing to London; evading his Navy buggery accusations; and still mustering enough credibility to effectively advance the Popish Plot fabrications. There is absolutely no reason for anyone who isn’t a completely unconnected African desert nomad to be at all ignorant of Cohen’s continuous patterns of fraud and other bu11$h1t, unless that ignorance is willfully concocted…
OT: a proposal for the purchase of Greenland:
1. The price is defined by reference to the difference between Denmark’s defense expenditure of 2% v 5% of GDP for x years;
2. Proceeds to be used by Denmark to buy US-manufactured weapons; and
3. The weapons purchased may be sold by Denmark to other NATO countries or provided to Ukraine.
Would seem to accomplish a lot of US objectives and might win over Denmark and NATO.
Daniel says: OT: a proposal for the purchase of Greenland:
Trump’s strategy to acquire Greenland looks like a carbon copy of how President Woodrow Wilson pressured Denmark to sell the Danish West Indies to us a century ago. We then named them the U.S. Virgin Islands.
American history may once again repeat itself. Woodrow Wilson’s deal was a straight cash purchase: $25,000,000 in 1917 U.S. dollars.
A referendum conducted of the people living in the Danish West Indies resulted in 99% voting in approval. That’s impressive – considering those people were the children of former black Danish slaves, and were well aware that Woodrow Wilson was a virulent racist and Kluxxer who immediately renewed segregation for black Americans upon taking office.
The residents of Greenland don’t want to be part of the US. Why would they when they see what is happening here.
The residents of Greenland don’t want to be part of the US. Why would they when they see what is happening here.
Why should they: the Democrat street thugs in Antifa, Black Liars & Marxists, Democrat city gun crime, etc is far, far away from Greenland. No Democrat homies from black and Hispanic street gangs and criminal Illegal Aliens will be packing their bags to move to Greenland.
You make that unfounded declaration with all the self-assurance of a Democrat claiming to have lived there and still having family there. The children of Denmark’s former black slaves weren’t in the slightest bit worried about the Danish West Indies being sold into the control of arguably the worst Democrat racist president ever, Woodrow Wilson.
Today’s Democrat party is even worse. With that fact in mind, I doubt very much that the residents of Greenland, in comparing what they currently get from Denmark versus the potential under US control would care in the slightest.
Particularly if another purchase by the USA of a Danish territory included an offer of a lump sum payment to each permanent resident of Greenland.
‘don’t want to be part of the US’
YOU could always move to Greenland, no? Please?
“The residents of Greenland don’t want to be part of the US.”
And you know that by exactly what means? Editorials appearing in virulently TDS-impacted media, and polls paid for by Soros-type organizations? At this time I don’t have any reliable idea what the majority of Greenlanders think or want wrt becoming part of the US, and neither do you.
They don’t want to be part of Denmark either because of the ways they have been mistreated by the Danish government over many decades. They want to be independent. But perhaps that would be a good compromise, since defense and trade agreements could be reached between the U.S. and an independent Greenland that might just more than satisfy the needs of both.
Off Topic: Civil Procedure (conflict of interest)
Defendant in Charlie Kirk’s killing asks judge to disqualify prosecutors
PROVO, Utah (AP) — The Utah man charged with killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk returned to court Friday, as his attorneys sought to disqualify prosecutors because the daughter of a deputy county attorney involved in the case attended the rally where Kirk was shot.
Defense attorneys say the relationship represents a conflict of interest after prosecutors said they intend to seek the death penalty for Tyler Robinson.
By: Hanna Schoenbaum and Matthew Brown – AP ~ January 16, 2026
https://apnews.com/article/charlie-kirk-tyler-robinson-hearing-187d3d4f1b2166232f9d2362001074d5
–
A prosecutor’s child witnessed Charlie Kirk’s assassination — can he take part in the case?
Defense argues conflict of interest exists because prosecutor’s relative was present during assassination
PROVO, Utah — Defense attorneys for the Utah electrician accused of assassinating Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk want the Utah County Attorney’s Office disqualified from handling the case because a member of the prosecution team had an adult child who was present for the murder.
By: Michael Ruiz , Adriana James-Rodil , Stepheny Price – Fox News ~ January 16, 2026
https://www.foxnews.com/us/prosecutors-child-witnessed-charlie-kirk-assassination-can-he-take-part-case
This is not a conflict for a prosecutor.
It would be a conflict for a judge or jury member.
But then Merchan had a far greater conflcit and ignored efforts to recuse.
Smells like desperation persperation.
Defining the left = lies and deception.
Defining the right = ignorant and hateful. Margot is the perfect example. As usual.
The stooge’s stooge reveals him/her/itself again!
She told the truth about you Ano
How so ? please explain ?
E=If your going to malign someone else you should provide evidence
Defining the right = ignorant and hateful.
It’s too early in the morning for the Democrat movie theater to be having a children’s matinee showing of the Democrat Commie Clown Show.
Projection:
Channeling one’s actions onto others typically refers to the psychological concept of projection, where a deeply emotionally disturbed individual unconsciously or deliberately attributes their own thoughts, feelings, and anti-social or criminal behaviors onto someone else.
This is an internal defense mechanism which allows mentally ill people to avoid confronting their own behavior and guilt by seeing it instead as as the thoughts and actions of another person who they despise and hate.
A SNAKE does not care who it bites! Instinct is hard to overcome – sleazebag snake.
Your comment insults snakes.
“A SNAKE does not care who it bites! Instinct is hard to overcome ”
However, that same survival-oriented, evolved instinct will often keep a snake from striking something that doesn’t represent a real threat. A rattlesnake may rattle at, but will almost never strike at, a person standing more than 5 feet away: to attack under those circumstances is prodigal waste of energy. The sleazebag in question lacks even that humble level of rudimentary sense and intelligence.
Contrary to the films Pulp Fiction and Michael Clayton, “fixers” are just crooked lawyers who are too stupid to make an honest living. Hollywood lionizes these clowns because Hollywood is constantly in need of their services.
And people like you pay to see those films. How would you otherwise know the plots?
Certainly you can’t be relied on for any plot. Yours is a life of painting by numbers!
@Diogenes
Correct. And the profession is now populated with them.
Turley has taken great pains here to illustrate what has long been obvious to anyone with a functioning brain – that Michael Cohen and his ilk are responsible for the adage:”How do you know when a lawyer is lying? His lips are moving”. Perhaps he should have devoted more of this column to the subject of how to get lawyers’ associations to do better policing and censuring of their their members, than in the minute repetition of Cohen’s transgressions. I guess that most lawyers (evidently including Turley) don’t want any effective limitations imposed on their latitude to lie under any circumstances whotsoever.
Is it reasonable to expect lawyers’ associations to police their own when we already joke that lawyers lie when their lips are moving? If that’s the case, why would we trust the association’s word any more than the individual lawyer’s?
Accountability shouldn’t depend on insider assurances but on observable actions and consequences. And if the public cannot tell truth from falsehood without a guild interpreting it for us, then the problem runs far deeper than any one lawyer.
@Olly. Off article subject, but would be equally as interested in your opinion of the ethics and actions of Abbie Normal (AKA Abbe Lowell). For that matter, include Rankin. Those of us who are life-long swamp rats would love to hear in a “turks head” Friday club meeting (without personal attack of course, just sticking to the issues). Would probably result in laughter requiring underwear change and a refreshing, not hatred amusement session. Who says satire isn’t humor too? And let’s face it, Cohen, James, Bragg, Marchan, Cooper, Boasberg – not to mention those that throw away the complaints registered against these without even actually registering.
We need more Oscar Wildes for fun and conversationally inspiring evenings.
I get the appeal Paul, and satire absolutely has its place. Wilde understood something we tend to forget: ridicule works best when it exposes patterns, not just personalities. My hesitation with focusing on individual actors is that history shows the names change, but the behavior doesn’t. Different lawyers, judges, politicians; same incentives, same rationalizations, same failures of formation. When we treat each episode as a one-off farce, we miss the recurring script. That’s why I’m more interested in the conditions that keep producing the same characters, over and over again.
Olly says: And if the public cannot tell truth from falsehood without a guild interpreting it for us, then the problem runs far deeper than any one lawyer.
Bar associations are a train wreck. But two or more things can be true at once. If we need to have a system where the public makes the determination of who is competent, professional and ethical without a guild, it’s going to be interesting when the public takes over determining who is a qualified doctor and surgeon, dentist, professional engineers, architects, etc.
Going to be a lot of unintended consequences if we ever adopt that academic theory.
The public as a whole can’t even properly police the school boards elected in many areas. While at the same time there are bar associations who simply do what the public they serve expects of them – they just don’t get the media and columnists’ attention that the political ones do.
This goes directly to formation. In a healthy republic, the public should be capable of recognizing dishonesty and abuse of power, even if it cannot judge technical expertise. The problem is that we’ve neglected civic formation for so long that capability can no longer be assumed. Handing ethical judgment entirely to guilds doesn’t solve that failure, it entrenches it. A self-governing people must be formed to exercise moral judgment, or the system quietly shifts from public accountability to permanent deference.
Olly says:This goes directly to formation.
No, your response goes to deflection and avoidance. That “civic formation” and values held by a moral people that are at the core of your posts has never existed for any particular time in our history.
Madison and Adams who you put forward previously didn’t have it surrounding them during their time, nor did they follow those admirable academic theories in the way they lived and fought their political battles.
I do not disagree with your academic ideals and theories, just as I (an agnostic) admire most of the guidance provided in the Bible and Torah for those who follow those teachings.
But what we SHOULD have as the citizenry you describe has never has existed previously in our history. Today is not new.
Attempting to get to that state of affairs is admirable and should be attempted. However it is academic theory which you write should be attempted, not dealing with the America we are living in today as one that has America has never seen before.
The religious leaders expounding the teachings in the Bible and Torah pretty much make similar admirable lectures to their flock, exhorting them to achieve the ideals as imperfect Americans. They’ve already been doing it for centuries during our existence. Pretty mixed results on their centuries of attempts.
I think this is the missing piece.
The American experiment is not just a form of government; it is a government designed specifically to secure unalienable rights while limiting power. That design demands the kind of formation I’m describing.
The Founders understood that such a system would not run on enforcement, expertise, or coercion alone. It required a people capable of self-government. That requirement wasn’t a claim about what already existed; it was the condition of the experiment itself.
If there is another form of government that secures unalienable rights more reliably without requiring citizens formed in restraint, responsibility, and moral judgment, I’m open to seeing it. History hasn’t produced one.
Every alternative either concentrates power or treats rights as permissions granted by the state. So the choice isn’t between academic theory and “real America.” It’s between a limited government that presumes formed citizens, and a different system altogether.
You can reject the formation requirement, but then you’re rejecting the kind of government the Founders designed.
.IMO Olly is correct. “Self governing”
Fair enough. I would still like to have seen Turley spend more time on possible solutions to moral vacancies like Cohen being empowered to sleaze their way through the system with relative impunity, and less on his very obvious transgressions.
If the solutions are so evident, there was nothing stopping you from offering them rather than faulting Turley for not doing so.
“If the solutions are so evident, there was nothing stopping you from offering them”
Well, there was once an actual formal political party, with nominees that appeared on official ballots, named the “Kill All Lawyers Party”. The name was (deliberately, I assume) over the top, but its prominent presence may have served the purpose of reminding lawyers that there are limits to the latitude that society will afford them that may stop short of that which they legally enjoy. That party disappeared at about the same time that our language was overtaken by the “never offend anyone by saying exactly what you think” tidal wave that has yet to recede. Aren’t lawyers largely responsible for the ascension of that concept? Have a nice day.
Mission Impossible!
You are an adult and you really believe in ANY organization self-policing? What planet are you from? (BTW, welcome to earth!)
Bingo!
. Not so, bingo. Right now there’s an evident manipulation by scorpions who’ve put a frog as the leadership. While the scorpions act only from self interest stinging Walz into a coma they steal, rob and other. Walz is not a wise man and the DOJ is after this kleptocracy narco-state as abuse of power, government gone wrong.
Perhaps he should have devoted more of this column to the subject of how to get lawyers’ associations to do better policing and censuring of their their members
I second that. I don’t believe anybody can name a lawyer who’s a member of the Washington DC Bar Association, whose fellow members of that bar are James Comey, Jack Smith, Peter Strzok, Loretta Lynch, Robert Mueller et al who repeatedly perjured themselves in Judge Boasberg’s FISA courts who is in compliance with that bar associations Professional Code of Conduct.
Not one of them even disbarred, much less serving a prison term for that perjury (or in Boasberg’s case, aiding and abetting it).
Other bar associations hound lawyers who dared to represent Trump out of the profession because… they dared to represent Trump.
Yet, just above, Professor Turley calls out Cohen for his un-lawerly acts in hopes of differentiating right from wrong and did a nice job too.
How are YOU part of the solution?
Michael Cohen is broke, and probably living off of his Wife & Father-in-Laws wealth.
Michael Cohen, Letitia James, Alvin Bragg, …. et.al. Played Ball and lost The Game.
Mikey couldn’t get a job at Hotdog-On-A-Stick at the Mall’s Food Court, yet alone at any Judicial Court.
“… The posting led some to speculate that Cohen is again marketing his availability to the highest bidder. …” -JT
You’ve got to hand it to him, He’s inventive to say the least in trying to drum-up some business. He’s also spooked like the rest of Us with the “Fear of Z-Mamdani”. But, the Kid still wants to Play Ball.
AI: ( Michael Cohen New York City Taxi Cab License )
Michael Cohen: Owned 10 New York City taxi medallions, the licenses needed to operate yellow cabs, which he leased to drivers for income but faced scrutiny for tax evasion related to this business and eventually had the NYC Taxi & Limousine Commission (TLC) move to revoke them after his guilty plea in 2018, as he had hidden income, and the city deemed his conviction grounds for license forfeiture, leading to a deadline to sell them.
Key Details:
Ownership: Cohen owned 10 taxi medallions, purchasing them as investments and leasing them out.
Business Model: He profited by leasing these medallions to operators, who then paid him.
Investigation & Plea: His taxi business became part of a federal investigation, leading to his guilty plea in August 2018 for tax evasion and bank fraud, stemming from hiding over $1.3 million in taxi income.
Revocation Threat: Following his plea, the TLC notified Cohen that they intended to revoke his 10 medallions, as his conviction was grounds for forfeiture under city regulations.
Deadline to Sell: Cohen was given a deadline (around September 10, 2018) to sell the licenses before they were officially revoked.
Medallion Value: The value of taxi medallions had plummeted by this time due to ride-sharing services, meaning Cohen likely lost millions on his investment.
Companies: He owned the medallions through various shell corporations, including Golden Child Hacking Corp. and Mad Dog Cab Corp..
Michael Cohen Pleads Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court To Eight Counts, Including Criminal Tax Evasion And Campaign Finance Violations
By: U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York ~ August 21, 2018
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/michael-cohen-pleads-guilty-manhattan-federal-court-eight-counts-including-criminal-tax
Michael Cohen is broke, and probably living off of his Wife & Father-in-Laws wealth. … not a bad gig. And you? Still toiling in your factory job?
“And you? Still toiling in your factory job?” Nope! We all come here for the shear entertainment of watching failed basement dwellers like you make comments!! THAT is entertainment, Dad!!!!
Somebody has to be Societies Janitor, so if the powers over me (and you) send me to the “School of Street Sweepers” ¹, then so be it.
It’s Societies’ loss not mine.
“No One can make you feel inferior without your consent” ².
Chin-Up, Keep a stiff upper Lip, Onward thru the Fog ³ …….
1. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn – The Gulag Archipelago, 1918-1956: An Experiment in Literary Investigation (Volume One-Three)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gulag_Archipelago
2. Eleanor Roosevelt – “No one can make you feel inferior without your consent,”
Eleanor Roosevelt’s famous quote, “No one can make you feel inferior without your consent,” means your self-worth ultimately comes from within, and you have the power to choose not to internalize others’ negative opinions or actions, though acknowledging that external factors can still challenge this. It emphasizes self-esteem, resilience, and that accepting someone’s power to diminish you requires your agreement, which you can refuse by trusting your own value and controlling your emotional response.
3. Oat Willie’s Slogan
https://www.leadingconsciously.com/blog/onward-through-the-fog-how-to-go-from-helplessness-to-optimism-128#:~:text=many%20of%20us.-,The%20visceral%20shutdown,she%20wondered.
This is a textbook example of the Jersey Flip test I lay out in Awakening a Forgotten Republic.
Take the messenger. Flip the jersey. If Michael Cohen were saying the exact same thing in service of the opposite side, would you dismiss it instantly as the ramblings of a serial liar? If the answer is yes, then your current acceptance has nothing to do with truth and everything to do with alignment.
Civic literacy demands this discipline. Self-government requires citizens who can separate evidence from allegiance, credibility from convenience. When we only believe a known liar after he puts on our jersey, we have failed the most basic test of independent judgment.
The Jersey Flip is not about changing sides. It is about exposing bias. If flipping the jersey flips your standards, then your standards were never principled to begin with.
Congratulations on the book, Olly! It will be a good read here in snowy Upstate New York.
Thank you, Catherine. I really appreciate the kind words, and I hope you enjoy it. This blog has also been something of a case study for me over the years; a front-row seat to watching the “jersey flip” in real time.
The Jersey Flip takes great pains to ignore the fact that many citizens are perfectly capable of separating evidence from allegiance and credibility form convenience – and then go straight out and vote for the Team Jersey that satisfies their emotions, greed, validate their membership in a group they identify with, whatever.
They really don’t care what academic theorists from any faction want to tell them about their standards – no different than the professional or tradesman who pockets a few supplies from work without the slightest feelings of guilt that they’re well aware they’re engaging in theft.
There aren’t many morally and intellectually pure people in this world, including among the intellectual theorists above the rest of us in the gritty unwashed masses below them.
I don’t ignore that reality at al. I regard it as evidence for the argument, not against it.
You’re right that many people can separate evidence from allegiance and then still choose the jersey for reasons of identity, emotion, or convenience. That isn’t a failure of intelligence; it’s a failure of formation.
The Founders never assumed citizens would be morally or intellectually pure. They assumed self-government required habits of restraint, accountability, and virtue precisely because people are tempted to rationalize bad choices. When those habits erode, people don’t stop knowing better, they stop caring.
At that point, neither expert guilds nor academic theorists can compensate for what a republic no longer forms in its citizens.
And I am sure that both James and Bragg, with straight faces, will both argue that since Cohen is a proven liar, he shouldn’t be believed, while neither had a problem with him when the lies were directed at Trump.
Who knows the back story here. Perhaps, James promised Cohen his law license back if he testified against Trump, and then reneged. When it comes to morals, many in NY seems to have forgotten them completely.
Just NY huh?
Show us your morals and ethics anon commenter?
Dad, quit picking on these people making innocent comments that deal with specific people and their locales. Is it really that tough to follow?
“To whom do lions cast their gentle looks?
Not to the beast that would usurp their den.
The smallest worm will turn being trodden on,
And doves will peck in safeguard of their brood”
This guy is a Loki wannabe, without Loki’s talent to screw up the story in Asgard.
Really? Get a life.
Dad, Please come up out of the basement, take the meds and get dressed. Grandpa says it is almost lunchtime. And today is also shower day, remember?
IMPEACH SOULLESS KRISTI NOEM NOW
Random senseless comment.
Random senseless comment.
Please pay no attention to Dad. Such outbursts are common when he goes off the meds.
The Dems will no proclaim that Cohen is a known liar and can’t be trusted, haha.
What’s genuinely fascinating is that out of eight billion people on the planet, someone like this manages to remain even marginally newsworthy. A man with a career built on deceit somehow keeps being treated as a source rather than a warning.
The lesson is older than politics. The boy who cried wolf wasn’t ignored because people were cruel or inattentive, but because credibility, once squandered, does not regenerate. Yet here we are, pretending that repeated falsehoods can be redeemed by convenience.
When a habitual liar tells a story that flatters a preferred cause, skepticism vanishes. The wolf is suddenly real again, not because the messenger has changed, but because the audience wants to believe him.
These stories persist not because the liar is persuasive, but because human nature is predictable. We don’t elevate them because they deserve attention. We elevate them because they tell us what we want to hear.
When a habitual liar tells a story … just like you silly commenter.
Dad, remember what the counselor said about repeatedly making unoriginal comments. It encourages people to think you are shallow and mindless. And we, as a family, can not afford to let any more terrible secrets out.
Speaking of case studies, nothing discredits an opinion faster than the way it’s expressed. Calling an argument “silly” isn’t maturity; it’s evasion.
What were they doing in the first place? Oh, they were trying to MANIPULATE a witness. The former District Attorney of Santa Barbara County, California IS ACTUALLY A CRIMINAL and I CAN PROVE IT! Joyce Dudley TOOK MILLIONS IN SETTLEMENTS from MEXICAN MAFIA CARTEL OPERATIVES in 2019 INSTEAD of prosecuting anyone and it was ALL DONE IN SECRET regarding the Biggest Illegal Cannabis BUST in HISTORY by Volume at 1807 West Highway 246 near Buellton, CA. That ROGUE CRIMINAL took over $4 Million Dollars into secret bank accounts. That stings. Dirty Cops are many times worse than criminals, actually. 🤬
Great another Soap show.
With respect to Cohen and New York Dirty Prosecutors—They were BORN in the SAME SWAMP!
Or sponsored for election with funds from George Soros.
Hmmm. “Different lily pad; same swamp” has a nice lilt to it, I’ll need to remember that one. Thanks!
Go ahead and deny trump and his sycophants are fascists all you want. When you do this you are admitting you are also a fascist.
This is wrong. When this is over and done, hopefully as soon as January 2027, trump and all his supporters will have a lot of crow to eat.
“Nebraska mom Jamie Bonkiewicz filmed her interaction with Secret Service agents who came to her door because of a tweet.
“The Secret Service came to my door today because of a tweet. No threats. No violence. Just words. That’s where we are now,” she wrote on X in a thread about the ordeal.”
STOP troll 🧌 you are NOTHING but some PARTISAN panty-wagger! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP is ACTUALLY the Best President our Country has ever had! With ALL THE BILLIONS LOST TO FRAUD and WASTE of the LIBERAL/PROGRESSIVES in California—LED BY NEWSCUM—We NEEEEEED Trump in #California more than anything else! 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
You’re the perfect example of horse shite.
Dad, the counselor said that if you did not take the meds you would revert back to the spineless basement dweller you were before and that name calling and misspelling would be the first signs of relapse. Please come upstairs, take the meds and take a shower.
If I am a fascist, I cannot even fathom what you and your fellow mindless minions are. Haha, no thanks on the crow, I prefer cornish hens in January.
Dad, we have not had “cornish hens” since Clinton cut the government workforce, you lost your job and retreated to the basement. Have you been holding out on mom and the rest of the kids since then? I knew it was not a good idea to put the SNAP benefits in grandma’s name and have you control the card. And we have outdated hot dogs while you eat “cornish hens” and rant?
“we have not had “cornish hens” since Clinton”
https://www.instacart.com/products/20159959-perdue-fresh-cornish-hen-twin-pk-per-lb
M0r0n!
How do you support ICE stoping United States Citizens in their cars?
How do you support ICE going to someones house because they put up and anti ICE post?
Please, you can stop your errant ways now before more people are killed. Please.
Humor knows no bounds
Dad, remember that Hitler, Bill Clinton and Joe Biden started off with “Just words.”. And look where that got us.
Mom said the same thing happened with you. And look “where we are now”.
Clinton gave us a balanced budget and economic prosperity. Biden saved us from a massive recession. The only good thing Hitler did was show us (now) not to tolerate fascists.
Jamie Bonkiewicz’s tweet was an implied threat.
It is the Secret Services job to investigate threats to people in the WH, They do that without regard to politics.
Bonkiewicz’s tweet is actually protected speech, it is not a crime.
But it is sufficient that she should expect a visit from the secret service.
This is not fascism it is just the Secret Service doing their job as they did under Biden.
Go ahead and deny trump and his sycophants are fascists all you want.
At 8:49 in the morning???? It’s too early in the morning for the Democrat movie theater to be having a childrens’ matinee showing of the Democrat Commie Clown Show.
Projection:
Channeling one’s actions onto others typically refers to the psychological concept of projection, where a deeply emotionally disturbed individual unconsciously or deliberately attributes their own thoughts, feelings, and anti-social or criminal behaviors onto someone else.
This is an internal defense mechanism which allows mentally ill people to avoid confronting their own behavior and guilt by seeing it instead as as the thoughts and actions of another person who they despise and hate.
That’s their job. You should define the word since you’re so keen to call people it.