We now have a glimpse of the War Powers Resolution promised by Sen. Tim Kaine (D., Va.), which is reportedly scheduled for a vote in the Senate on Tuesday. The resolution purportedly ends all combat operations against Iran … until you reach the very end where there is a hole that you could drive a combat task force through.
I respect members asserting their inherent constitutional authority. I have long criticized the lack of declarations of war as demanded by the Framers. We have not had a formal declaration of war since World War II. However, courts and Congress have long deferred to presidents in the conduct of such operations.
I represented congressional members challenging the Libyan war operation launched by President Barack Obama. Most Democratic members were entirely silent when Obama (and President Joe Biden) exercised such authority against different countries. Notably, the Libyan operation clearly sought regime change without an imminent threat to the United States. Some of those members are now the loudest condemning President Donald Trump in this operation.
This resolution shows how presidents can easily box in Congress once combat operations begin.
The resolution boldly declares “Congress hereby directs the President to terminate the use of United States Armed Forces for hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran or any part of its government or military.”
However, at the very end, the resolution has this line: “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the United States from defending itself from imminent attack.”
As I wrote this week, the problem with such resolutions is that they are effectively meaningless in the context of full combat operations against a nation: “Kaine and others insist that hostilities were not imminent when we attacked. Even if that were true, they are now.”
In these circumstances, it would be nearly impossible to limit the war powers of the President without putting American personnel or allies at risk. After decapitating the leadership in Iran, Iranian assets are clearly operating under prior orders in a decentralized structure. The United States is now seeking to neutralize any assets that it can find in preemptive attacks while trying further to degrade the command structure and military capacity of the Iranian government.
As I wrote earlier:
“The choice now for Democrats is either a senseless or suicidal resolution. It can either resolve to end hostilities as soon as practically possible (an objective already stated by the Administration) or it can actually seek to limit the Administration’s options amid full-fledged war.”
This is the senseless option. All threats from Iran are now “imminent,” and all attacks are arguably preemptive. So what does this actually do?
Here is the resolution: Iran War Powers Resolution
Well if you’re an American President you should just give the Iranians a plane filled with cash
and ask them pretty please stop building a nuclear device. Say pretty please don’t build an intercontinental ballistic missile to carry the bomb. Oh pretty pretty please. That’ll do it.
The Obama doctrine said so. Sucker.
According to Rubio, the Iranians were not building a nuclear weapon. They generate electricity from nuclear power, which is what they were doing with the radioactive material they had. Anyway, Trump said last June that the United States “totally obliterated” the nuclear power plant. Could that be a lie?
FALSE
You need 3-5% enriched uranium for a power plant. Iran was rebuilding enrichment facilities to get to 60%
Anything beyond 3-5% is for bomb making only.
The US did not obliterate a nuclear power plant.
We obliterated their enrichment fascilities.
They were rebuilding. They were not days from a bomb. But they clearly had not abandoned building a bomb.
“if you’re an American President you should just give…”
The question under discussion is not what the strategic solution to the problem presented by Iran should be or have been. The question is who has the Constitutional authority to design and apply the solution. Anyone who disagrees with that should just candidly admit that they favor just outright burning that document and reverting to an authoritarian dictatorship and/or pure mob-rule democracy (not that there is any essential difference there) as our form of government.
While a Generally agree with you. At the same time we have centuries of SCOTUS decisions that are at odds with the plain text of the constitution – and this is one of those areas.
Further as Scalia famously said – “the constitution is not a suicide pact”
Someone here rants regularly about Lincoln’s constitutional overreach – and I agree.
In many cases SCOTUS eventually reversed lincoln – but they waited until it did not matter to do so.
There is little doubt that Lincoln exercised powers the constitution never gave the president.
There is also no doubt we would be a completely different country if he had not.
With respect to YOUR statement – the power to design and apply a solution rests clearly with the president.
But the constitution requires that congress determine that the president is authorized to use that power.
“However. courts and Congress have long deferred to presidents in the conduct of such operations.”
“However, courts and Congress have long cowered, quaking and trembling, in darkened corners, allowing presidents to exercise unconstitutional carte blanche in the conduct of such operations.” – fixed that one for you, Jon Turley.
I don’t see the final statement in the proposed WPA as being that broad. The word imminent has a specific legal term of art meaning. The courts regularly deal with whether a person who attacked before being attacked because the person believed (s)he was in “imminent” danger. I guess the question would be whether an attack being imminent means an actual attack on American soil. If it means an attack on any outpost outside of American soil then an attack can always be deemed imminent. It is not unreasonable to expect the law to address this.
“It is not unreasonable to expect the law to address this.”
IMO it is unreasonable to think that “the law” in your context is required to address something that is so freaking obvious.
Modern dems are untrustworthy and without redemption, it’s that simple. Hopefully this is clear to every other voter as we head into the midterms.
That Tim Kaine and his ilk believe the Iranian Regime’s threats were not “imminent” has been echoed over and over again in progressive media as the reason why the status quo that was should still be in place. One wonders just what exactly they understand “imminent” to mean. Surely, it does not mean until it becomes too late to address. If sanctions and military operations like Midnight Hammer have not dissuaded the Iranian Regime from resuming further development and eventual use of nuclear weaponry to prosecute its agenda, what will? Imminence is not always only what will occur next. It also entails under the given circumstances what is much too likely to occur ultimately. Get it done now, Tim Kaine, before it is too late to do so.
At least one dedicated democrat has it in proper perspective.
https://x.com/i/status/2028114583534100910
Wait–Didn’t Trump say last June that Iran’s nuclear facility was “totally obliterated”? Did he lie? Did Rubio lie when he said that Iran did not have the capacity to build a nuclear weapon or an ICBM? Did he lie? Or, are you just repeating MAGA media talking points?
Trump say last June that Iran’s nuclear facility was “totally obliterated”
No
“No”
Hmmm…
“Following the June 2025 strikes on Iran, Donald Trump claimed that the military action, known as Operation Midnight Hammer, “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities, including sites at Fordow and Natanz. He stated that the attack achieved “monumental damage” and effectively ended Iran’s nuclear program.”
Appears to me that the answer is an almost completely unequivocal “Yes”…
nope
He did not say that. You are so stupid, I don’t know why Turley allows u to comment.
“Did he lie?”
Apparently, you have never heard of re-starting a program.
“you have never heard of re-starting a program”
Restarting a huge, capital and labor intensive, national program that had been “completely obliterated” just 9 months before, to the point that it again reached some kind of critical mass demanding immediate action, is one *H311* of an impressive accomplishment, wouldn’t you agree?
Gosh, u are such an idiot. And u have convinced yourself you are quite perceptive. U r really a big, dumb moron. Seriously.
Ask someone who understands college level English to explain it. Better yet, stop revealing what a huge moron you are, without getting at least a B.A. first.
I personally believe that the President should have to go to congress before initiating hostilities.
But that has not been true for my entire lifetime.
Right now most of us are hoping for a quick relatively bloodless conclusion to all of this.
We hope Iran will run out of missles soon.
That US and Israeli forces will take out enough Iranian leadership and they will capitulates.
If this is over quickly with little bloodshed beyond the Irainian regime, then this will prove a great Triumph for Trump.
I hope and pray that is the case – because that is good for the world. A peaceful Iran that is not a terrorist theocracy would massively change the world.
But I have hoped and prayed things turned out well far too many times and it has not.
The US has an abysmal record in attempts at Regime Change.
I hope I am wrong and that unlike nearly every US president in my lifetime Trump actually knows what he is doing here.
There is very little doubt that Trump has a far better understanding of the various nations of the mideast than any prior US president.
There are many things the US can without question accomplish.
WE can further damage the Irainian Nuclear program,
We can destroy the Irainian missle program
We can cut off Irainian oil to China and Cuba.
We can cutoff Irainian munitions to Russia.
But absent an end to the Iranian regime all of the above will eventually come back.
Pro US Iranian protests throughout the world are meaningless – those people left Iran – they are NOT friends of the regime.
Thus far I have not seen inside Iran any hints that the Iranian people are ready to change the Regime.
It is possibly a bit early – and maybe we will see something as it becomes safer to come out on the streets.
But so far there are no indications this regime is going to topple.
One thing that is becoming obvious is that The regime of the Ayatolahs is not a personality cult
That there are a large number of people that are part of the power structure of that regime and that decapitation was not sufficient
to get a change of direction.
Those in power seem to be content to endure a severe beating from the US, and claim victory by surviving.
Toppling this regime requires millions in the streets, it requires the military to back the protestors,
it requires dramatically disempowering the IRGC
Iran is probably weaker than it has been in almost 50 years.
But this regime does not appear to be failing under its own weight or that of our impressive millitary, and without some force on the ground – preferably that of the Iranian people. This regime seems likely to survive.
When Maduro was Removed in Venezuela, Rodriguez stepped in and is cooperating with the US.
That is not happening in Iran so far.
Tell you what. Go to Iran for a nice 2 month stay. You’ll enjoy it. Honestly.
and take Adolf O’Casio and her co-scholars. They have wonderful beaches I hear.
Think balance of power and checks and balances. Know what I mean?
The dems are showing with whom they are aligned.
I don’t see Congress impeaching the president.
Looks like it approves of his behavior.
__________________________________________
Article 2, Section 4
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors
They never touched Obama when he took off bombing Libya for NO reason. Ask Nancy P. She said he could bomb away.
John Say,
“We hope Iran will run out of missles soon.”
Run out? Iran has a stockpile much larger than Israel or the U.S. interceptor supply. Trump was betting on a quick war. But clearly that’s not turning out to be the case. Iran destroyed $1 billion early warning radar that was supposed to help detect Iranian missile launches. Now they are relying on airborne radars which are less effective.
The U.S. cannot maintain the current tempo of defending against wave after wave of hundreds of drones and missiles. They have a few days worth of munitions at best and Iran is a big country with plenty of places to keep launching from. This is going to be a math problem for Trump. Not Iran.
“But this regime does not appear to be failing under its own weight or that of our impressive millitary, and without some force on the ground – preferably that of the Iranian people. This regime seems likely to survive.”
Correct.
Iran planned for this. They are not structured in a way that killing leadership collapses their military structure. Trump and Hegseth are just now realizing this. Iran may not be able to outright defeat the U.S. but they can certainly outlast it in the region. Trump will likely start begging allies for help but given how he has badmouthed them just recently. They may not even lend a hand at all. It’s not their fight.
Trunk started this war with Netanyahu. Now he has to figure out how he will end it. It’s becoming apparent that he never had a clear plan on what will happen next.
“Run out? Iran has a stockpile much larger than Israel or the U.S. interceptor supply.”
Not likely and not relevant.
First Iran has two different means to harrass Israel and others – IRMB – between 1000-4000.
But more importantly they have far fewer launch vehicles.
A fixed missle launcher will be taken out immeditely after it is first used – If there are 1000 more missles for it – they are wasted.
Mobile launchers last longer, but still are unlikely to get more that a few shorts off before they are destroyed.
When Iran runs out of launchers they are done until they can create more
We are with certainty targeting Missle and Missle launcher production.
Next a signficant portion of their IRBM’s fail Between failures and intercepts less than 30% are getting through – possibly much less.
Further IRBM’s are a really really expensive way to target any enemy While the US is spending far more on this war than Iran = we can afford it.
Iran can not afford water for half its population.
The US an Israel are intercepting IRBMs, they are knocking out launchers and they are destroying stockpiled missles
There is ZERO doubt we can run Iran out of missles.
But they also make enormous numbers of drones. These are cheaper, less reliable and much easier to intercept.
And Iran has more of these than Missles.
Of course Iran gets Cash by selling drones to Russia.
This war is choking China of oil, and choking Russia of 40% of its munitions for the war with Ukraine.
Whether we can run Iran out of Drones and missles is really rhetoricial – of course we can.
The issue is how much damage can Iran do first.
Based on news accounts of the numbers of missles and drones each day at different countries I doubt Iran has more than a weeks supply left.
that.
The big US concern is not using our entire stockpile dealing with Iran – or we might provoke China to attack Tiawan.
That is unlikely because the recent purge of 4000 Top PLA officers leave China unable to manage any significant military operations.
Further they are seeing in Ukraine, and Venezuella, and Iran the power of Our forces. I do not think China is attacking Taiwan.
But that is a factor.
Next – though Tomohawks are expensive – the use has active contracts for thousands of less capable shorter range cruise missles – in the 200K-500K each range.
These are all airdrop or air launched but they are cheap and we are starting to manufacture them in large numbers.
The most limited resources we have is the anti-ship missle interceptors. So far Iran does not appear to have been able to consequentially threaten the US navy.
“Trump was betting on a quick war. But clearly that’s not turning out to be the case.”
I have no idea what Trump was counting on – nor do you. Regardlesss we can exhaust their missle and drone supplies.
“Iran destroyed $1 billion early warning radar that was supposed to help detect Iranian missile launches.”
Have no idea what you are talking about
” Now they are relying on airborne radars which are less effective.”
Airborne radars are MORE effectively, but they are more vulnerable against a military with a meaningful airforce.
Regardless the US has zero problems with its “kill chain”
The F-22 has an amazing radar which it is likely we are not using at all. A significant part of modern stealth is that the weapons systems that are going to kill the enemy emit Nothing detectable.
“The U.S. cannot maintain the current tempo of defending against wave after wave of hundreds of drones and missiles. They have a few days worth of munitions at best and Iran is a big country with plenty of places to keep launching from. This is going to be a math problem for Trump. Not Iran.”
Bzzt Wrong. Iran is twice the size of TX – but that matters very little to F22’s and F35’s. What matters is finding and killing the launch vehicles – and they have far fewer of those. Longer distance missles likely do not have mobile launchers – they get taken out quickly.
It took Israel 12 days to burn through their inventory last time. Most of what we are using in Iran is NOT being used in Ukraine – so the ukraine war which HAS reduced some US stockpiles has NOT reduced stopiles of critical weapons for THIS fight.
Further we Own the skies over Iran at this time. WE can safely drop WWII Dump bombs for months.
There cheap and we have lots.
“Iran planned for this. They are not structured in a way that killing leadership collapses their military structure.”
So far that appears to be correct. Iran is structured more like the Mafia. Decapitation does not appear to work – so far.
“Trump and Hegseth are just now realizing this. Iran may not be able to outright defeat the U.S. but they can certainly outlast it in the region. ”
What does outlast mean ? Iran will with near certainty run out of weapons that can act outside its borders quickly.
But so long as the US is unwilling to put troops on the ground and the iranian people and/or army do not come out – the IRGC and Basij can take a beating for a long long time.
“Trump will likely start begging allies for help but given how he has badmouthed them just recently. They may not even lend a hand at all. It’s not their fight.”
Not paying attention are you ? 3 gulf nations are now publicly in the fight. Privately at least 5 are.
Starmer nearly got tossed by his own party for blocking the US use of UK bases. That has been fixed.
Beyond that Europe has little to contribute – they are producing what Ukraine needs – not what is needed in Iran.
These two wars are ALMOST inversions of each other – though Both have lots of Drones – long range drones are only a small percent of th Ukraine was. They are the only drone used in Iran. Lots more missles are being used in Iran. Ukraine has tanks and atrillery but no consequential air war. Iran has no tanks and artilery and si entirely an air war.
Further you have the two most formidable airforces in the world Joined against Iran.
“Trump started this war with Netanyahu. Now he has to figure out how he will end it. It’s becoming apparent that he never had a clear plan on what will happen next.”
It does not matter whether Trump had a plan – wars do not go according to plan.
Trump can not continue this long POLITICALLY.
He needs “regime change” because that is a sign of victory that Everyone understands.
Trump can stop this and declare victory whenever he wants.
But without regime change before the war powers act kicks in, this will do more harm that good politically.
John.
Funny isn’t it. When Obama was bombing Libya for no good reason. Nancy P (Speaker) at that time has no issue, and said it’s legal what he’s doing.
Short memories.
Xlax wrote: “Iran destroyed $1 billion early warning radar that was supposed to help detect Iranian missile launches.”
John Say: “Have no idea what you are talking about”
John, I think that might be the US radar system in Qatar. I don’t know if it was completely damaged or not, but it wasn’t an Israeli system, and it had little to do with Israeli defense. The dumpster diver has little useful information to provide.
“Run out? Iran has a stockpile much larger than Israel or the U.S. interceptor supply.”
Dumb. The most limiting factor is the number of launchers, which are continuously being diminished. That stops the Iranians from using massive barrages, which doesn’t permit as much overloading of defensive systems. Iran is also attacking its neighbors, which reduces the supplies. After today, I am not sure how many missiles will remain.
You support anti-American terrorists and wish mortal harm on your fellow Americans. You are a vicious animal without common sense or the ability to think.
X/George:
Pardon my paraphrasing parody but, “[You] started these condescending disagreements with others and Professor Turley. Now [you] have to figure out how you will end it and gain some credibility on this blog. It’s becoming apparent that [you] never had a clear plan on what will happen next.
We will launch shoulder operated nuclear weapons first. The U.S. ain’t going nowhere, you utter fool and idiot. Woke is way beyond just dumb. It is a done deal. Position yourself to keep buying stock through your dollar cost averaging.
“I personally believe that the President should have to go to congress before initiating hostilities.”
I think war was widely seen as coming. Based on the need for secrecy and that the strike might have been waiting for the opportunity to kill the leadership, I don’t know how that would be possible. They were notified within the appropriate time frame. Congress leaks.
The President is Commander-in-Chief
The WPA, constitutional or not
The President did not declare war.
The framers were ambiguous: make war -> declare war
The Acts under Adams created a crack that has been expanded ever since, and Congress has not sealed the crack.
Politicians being politicians. who knew? You know what this is? A dodge and a set up. Nobody wants to be seen as weak on war, it is a stick Republicans have beat on Democrats for a long time. Yet, they get to stand beat their chest saying they stood up to the President.
At the same time, if the Democrats take back the House, this is what they will use impeach Trump.
Regardless of where one stands on this particular issue at this moment, if you angry about it now and not in the past because it was your guy, then you are a hypocrite. If you were angry in the past and not now because it is your guy, then you are a hypocrite too.
Oh wait, they are politicians……
“if you angry about it now and not in the past because it was your guy, then you are a hypocrite. If you were angry in the past and not now because it is your guy, then you are a hypocrite too.”
Well, I am exempt from your accusations of hypocrisy, because I do not have any “guys” who are politicians. I think that every politician of any stripe, certainly any successful example, is a sleazy, self-serving, lying @$$h013, by definition. But I also think that, at this particular moment, the Democrat politicians are significantly worse examples of that than are the Republicans. So, while I object to this operation on principle, I do hope that it is a success, to hopefully prevent the Democrats from trashing what little we have remaining of our individual Liberty for one more election cycle.
Given only milquetoast communists (liberals, progressives, socialists, democrats, RINOs, AINOs) such as Tim Kaine et al., America would have never been separated from Great Britain; established in 1789; expanded by the Louisiana Purchase; developed to the Pacific Ocean; and supplemented by Hawaii and Alaska.
America would have been too pantywaist, craven, and pusillanimous to accomplish anything of value and worth, anything good.
But then, where would the communists (liberals, progressives, socialists, democrats, RINOs, AINOs) obtain all the wealth from other people’s money they redistribute per Karl Marx?
re: Tim Kaine
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
– Gospel of St Matthew 7:15-20
Woody Kaine Gets “Slap On The Wrist” Over March 4 Trump Antifa Riot
ST. PAUL, Minn. – Linwood “Woody” Kaine has been sentenced over his involvement in the Antifa riots against March 4 Trump supporters.
Kaine, who made national headlines when he was arrested with seven other co-defendants in connection with riots at the Minnesota State Capitol in March, is the son of former vice presidential candidate and sitting U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA). On March 4, Antifa members, including Kaine, flooded the Capitol building to disrupt local Trump supporters who were gathering in conjunction with the national March 4 Trump movement.
Many Antifa members attempted to conceal their identity by covering their faces with bandanas and goggles. As Alpha News reported, the rioters used mace, tasers, smoke bombs, and firecrackers on members of the pro-Trump rally, and punched others in the face. Kaine was one of six counter protesters arrested over the violence.
https://alphanews.org/woody-kaine-gets-reduced-charges-march-4-trump-antifa-riot/
Centcom: Two days ago, the Iranian regime had 11 ships in the Gulf of Oman, today they have ZERO. The Iranian regime has harassed and attacked international shipping in the Gulf of Oman for decades. Those days are over. Freedom of maritime navigation has underpinned American and global economic prosperity for more than 80 years. U.S. forces will continue to defend it.
https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2028553001644736808
OMFK
There is zero doubt that the US and Israel can destroy anything they wish in Iran
But anything destroyed can be rebuilt eventually.
Wiping out the top leadership has not brought the leaders to the negotiating table.
The Iranian people have not risen to fight the IRGC, The Iranian army has not backed them.
I expect that the drone and missle attacks will cease soon – Iran will run through its stock or we will destroy the missles and launchers.
Then What ?
We are not putting boots on the ground – and they know it.
Absent a coup or revolution, eventually we are going to declare victory and leave, And Iran will slowly rebuild everything we destroyed.
Maybe. Not if they are smart.
Trump and the MAGAs are a domestic enemy of the US and the biggest threat to international peace. We need to go to war against them. It is the sworn legal obligation of all US military personnel to eliminate Trump and the MAGAs.
Better watch out there, bub, you might get a visit from USSS.
So says the unassimilable anti-American illegal alien foreign invader who must be compassionately repatriated.
Anonymous– Use your real name. You have called for the insurrection of our military and murder of our President and those of us to support his programs which includes me. I want to know who are and in light of your threat, I think I have a right to know.
I am calling for the US Military to uphold their oath of office. I want Trump arrested and tried for treason.
Trump has done nothing to meet the constitutional definition of treason. Get a copy and read it.
well, he criticizes radical lefties. how horrible can u be? Imagine! Calling out lefties for not standing up to protect Americans first!
Trump/Maga hater ANON supports our enemies!! TRAITOR!!
Keep talking dirtbag!
Ano
international peace
________________________
Peace you say. Hmm Did you say anything about Peace, when Obama was bombing Libya for no good reason. Nancy P and other dems said he need no Congress approval.
Look what happened to that country. It’s now a (Black) slave trader country. Thanks Obama, you did that!
This is backwards. Trump needs to get Congressional authorization to start a war, not Congress needs to order Trump to stop it.
Cain is trying to generate publicity for his re-election.
The American Founders established a restricted-vote republic, not a “dictatorship of the majority,” aka “the poor,” through a one-man, one-vote democrazy.
In the intended severely restricted-vote republic, such as the actual America of its Founders, this clown would have never been elected.
i had waited for time to change her
the only change that came was over me
give us time. we got 3 years left
Tim Cain survived purely because his mother refused to take him back — proof that sometimes the return policy really does shape a man’s destiny.
Barron Trump burst into tears on Monday after an examination by a prominent Washington, DC podiatrist found no evidence of bone spurs.
“I’m totally screwed!” the young Trump reportedly shrieked, hurling himself to the floor of the doctor’s office in anguish.
At the White House, Donald J. Trump said that the podiatrist’s x-ray equipment had treated his son “very unfairly,” adding, “This should never be allowed to happen in this country.”
“This is what happens when you trust a real doctor,” he said. “I should have just sent the kid to my new Surgeon General.”
LAME…
Liberals trying to be funny like the Babylon Bee always fail because . . . liberals simply don’t understand humor. Give it up. Better to be thought a fool that to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Once upon a time they did. For several gnerations most good comics were liberal, some extremely liberal.
Today no one on the left knows how to be funny.
“Today no one on the left knows how to be funny.”
Maybe we need to resurrect George Carlin. Although I’m not 100% sure about Carlin’s position on the political spectrum, he was pretty much an equal opportunity offender…
Did Joe Biden(or Hunter) serve in the military DF ANON?? Phony Asthma excuse for Joe; or was it for stuttering????
The Iranian regime was buying time to complete their nuclear objective, a weapon to hold the world hostage to its demands. Obama and Biden bought them off thinking they, in their delusion of superiority as President, could hold them off and control the situation with cash. They were stupid and helping Iran to achieve their goal. The Islamic terrorists would never again need commercial jetliners to do their dirty work they would have the means to totally destroy the west not just a few buildings. They almost succeeded but Trump has stopped them. Thank you Mr. President.
woke is the dumbest body of political causes of all time. it is hard to grasp how retarded they are. they lock on to a morsel of truth and are convinced they have the whole story. trump/the u.s. military ain’t going nowhere soon, girls.
woke is the dumbest body of political causes of all time
Yup. When your efforts include putting men in women’s sports, locker rooms, and showers, and when you divide humanity into oppressed and oppressors based on skin color, and when you favor goals like defund the police and child sexual mutilation, you’ve kind of lost all claim to intelligence or even sanity.
“kind of”
i no. they really built a powerful platform, ain’t?
they should forbid pellio and co. from doing more insider windfall theft, too, although their King has already mentioned it, they could latch on to it and benefit. What does nanny have now, $400,000,000.00? i’m in the wrong line of greed, i mean “work”.
Here is Nancy Pelosi saying that Obama did not need congressional authorization to begin operations in Lybia, or to continue such operations, which including bombing Lybia. What has changed, Nancy? POTUS’s party affilication?
https://x.com/Lancegooden/status/2028455205495349345
How about some Regime Change closer to Home.
Nicaragua
Cuba
Mexico
Alberta Canada (because they already lean toward becoming an American State – No.# 51)
Regime Change in exchange for Statehood.
A great Idea!