We have seen protesters on the left around the country mocking the assassination of Charlie Kirk, even reenacting his murder. Hate traffickers like Jennifer Welch have even justified his assassination. It is all shocking and depressing, but none reached the level of Hasan Piker leading a huge crowd in mocking Kirk and his faith. Before he was murdered, Kirk debated Piker and called him a “socialist hypocrite.” What is shocking is not the utter depravity and cruelty of Piker, but the ecstasy of the crowd in relishing the death of someone with opposing views. It is part of the conditioning in an “age of rage.”
In the video, Piker leads the crowd in the meme song “We Are Charlie Kirk” at a stop of his “Fear& LIVE” tour, including such lines as “We are Charlie Kirk, we carry the flame. We’ll fight for the Gospel, we’ll honor his name.” His co-hosts and the crowd seem to be laughing with joy.
Joining him at this hatefest at the Golden Gate Theatre in San Francisco on August 21 were reportedly Will Neff, QTCinderella, and AustinShow.
Hasan is wearing his now-signature Mao jacket as the young crowd and his co-hosts laugh hysterically. It is the very essence of this movement to desensitize people, particularly young people, to violence and hate.
In Rage and the Republic, I wrote about this national ragefest. It allows people to hate completely and without thought to the humanity of those being hurt. What people will not admit is that they like it. Rage is addictive, and it is contagious. Just look at the crowd in San Francisco, and you will see the addictive quality of uncut, undiluted hate:
Piker, Will Neff, QTCinderella, AustinShow, and these fans have every right to spread hate. It is protected speech just as KKK and neo-Nazi groups are allowed to promulgate their own hateful values.
What is exasperating is how hatemongers on the left want to enjoy hate speech while accusing others of hate and intolerance. They do so by excusing their actions or views by demonizing those who disagree. Democratic leaders continue the false claim that democracy is dying in America and that this may be our last free election. While made over multiple elections, this repeated claim of the imminent death of democracy (unless they are elected) does not appear to register with their supporters.
Recently the rhetoric has reached hysterical levels. Florida Democratic Senate candidate Angie Nixon has compared Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to “modern-day slave catchers” and the government is “literally trying to kill us.”
It is a narrative that allows you to speak like a Nazi while claiming to be fighting Nazis.
Piker thrilled the crowd by mocking a murdered man over his faith and his death. It is more than being simply classless. It is commodifying rage. Piker is reportedly raking in a fortune as are other hatemongers like Jennifer Welch. They traffic in rage to a nation of rage addicts.
It is a scene that only reaffirms the work of Kirk who sought to expose the hate and intolerance of the left, particularly on our campuses. Kirk infuriated many by challenging them to debate. There is no room for reason in an age of rage. Those who try to introduce opposing views on campuses are cancelled or attacked.
Recently, a group of pro-life teenagers were kicked out of the Wydaho Roasters coffee shop in Idaho by an owner who found their presence intolerable. At universities, faculty members have attacked displays and even students in righteous rage. One professor who pleaded guilty to assaulting pro-life students was not only retained on the faculty but even honored by another school.
Civility, and even humanity, become signs of weakness in these times. They gravitate to figures like Abdul El-Sayed who has campaigned with Piker and promises to “choke out” Republicans and refers to moderates like Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman (D) as ogres to have their heads cut off and put on pikes.
The American left has found their berserkers, the old Norse warriors who were known to fight in a virtual violent trance. The new berserkers offer the chance to hate completely and without remorse or reflection. Over time, supporters are conditioned to disregard even the murder of those with opposing views. As shown in San Francisco, assassination becomes nothing more than a sing-a-long in an age of rage.
Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the best-selling author of “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.”
The reason the socal retards cheered Barry Soetoro when he said “you didn’t build that ” is they aren’t capable of building squat… just a bunch of mouth breathing low IQ retards who feed on violence and grifting.
#. This blog is trolled. It’s frightening.
Would Jack the baker make a cake celebrating the opening of a lgbt business? That case didn’t make sense except by forced speech or labor.
Karimi needs a sign on the door- no political or religious discussions allowed.
Piker has anti-social personality disorder.
Adieu, the blog is trolled. Nice meeting some of you.
An enlightening but troubling essay, suggesting that are major problem is neither economic nor political, but moral.
Keep talking Piker! As Sinatra sung, “Riding high in April, shot down in May.” Change the months. Piker and his buds will be shot down by the people, and the current fawning will dry up fast. He, and his buds have overreached and will soon learn the hard reality that they turn off most people outside the echo chamber.
Trump supporters are literal subhumans and must be reminded at every opportunity that the last thing they’ll ever see is a leftist laughing at them as they lie expiring on the ground.
“It’s better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt”
― Mark Twain
Yet it is leftists who prove by their words and actions they are the subhumans. They are the ones who want pornography in elementary school libraries, the mutilation of children, assault on women, support pedos and men who commit acts of violence against women and children.
#. Anti-social personality disorder
Mr. Piker can mock and ridicule Christians. The Christian God was mocked and ridiculed already. Christians are familiar with people like Piker. What does he think he’s doing? It’s so ignorant. 😂
^^^ He’s unaware of Easter. He was born here and his parents went to Turkey after his birth in infancy. He returned as an adult. He’s natural born, folks.
It’s Easter, Piker. He needs to be watched. Psychiatrists know it.
^^^^ Seriously, he should be watched. He’s mentally ill. Mental illness dressed up stylish as Ted Bundy maybe.
Take care
There is something to be learned from the Alex Jones saga. He was raking in $ millions by mocking the Sandy Hook school parents whose children were murdered. The monetization of rage compares with Hasan Piker (though Piker would envy the former’s take). The Sandy Hook parents effectively used our civil torts system to bring down Alex Jones rage-media-empire. Piker only needs to be recorded spouting some made-up falsehood smearing TPUSA and Charlie Kirk to face the same consequence.
Turley has been known to support defamation law as a well-reasoned exception to free speech. Why does he insist that rage rhetoric is protected free speech when there are are cases we all remember that successfully beat back brazen infowarfare? Fox News paid out $780,000,000 over its raging against Dominion Voting Systems. CNN and WaPo settled for an undisclosed amount over its rage campaign against Nicholas Sandmann.
Yes, these legal tools could use some calibrated reinforcement — such as speeded up due process to keep pace with the the instant-information age — and to allow any citizen who has been intentionally duped for political effect to wage a Public Frauds suit against the originator and all media amplifiers.
Uncontested rage is not a sign of a healthy polity because it hardens and radicalizes positions while making others simply withdraw from political conversation out of fear of being denounced. “Rage and the Revolution” offers a candid factual picture of the evil barbarism it can unleash. Is it unreasonable to demand that public speech at least adhere to some basic standards of honesty and civility (as determined by a jury of 12 average Americans)?
There is a practical solution awaiting the overtaking of the public square by people like Jones and Piker. It won’t be perfect, but we can’t make that the enemy of the good.
When leftists say and show you who they really are, believe them.
These people are not well.
Yeah, leftists are the unwell ones. Anyway, you crashed the economy and started, and then lost a war.
Whoa! I have the power to crash the economy and start a war?
I did all that and started college, all in one day!
low iq mister A
While I do not advocate assassination except as a possible ultimate tactic of last resort (an exigency I very much hope that we do not come to here), I could certainly regard it as Karma should someone decide to make Piker the “beneficiary” of his hateful rhetoric.
“There is no room for reason in an age of rage.” (JT)
Great line.
And that is the root cause of the Left’s rising barbarism: Academia’s decades-long assault on reason.
Sam,
Well, reason is based on facts, logic, common sense.
Rage, is all emotion. Things like facts, logic, and common sense be d***ned.
Look at the fury and rage in the faces of the hangdog conservatives who spend every waking moment mocking George Floyd and the people your ICE thugs shot. Look at the fury and helplessness in their faces, and laugh.
Yeah don’t remember that. We did see folks standing up for the rules of law.
That officer had nothing to do with Floyd’s death. (drugs)
It was the left who tried to make him look like a nice guy. But his pass showed everyone, who he really was.
DustOff,
Quite right.
George Floyd was an unfortunate incident of his own doing (long history of drug abuse). His criminal record, not better. He was not some kind of saint they (the left) tried to paint him as.
As for those shot by ICE, dont try to use your car as a weapon, or confront LEOs while carrying with enough ammunition to commit a mass shooting.
We are not celebrating their deaths. Their deaths were tragic and unfortunate. And by their own doing.
You heard it here first folks: You don’t get to have 2nd amendment rights unless you’re a nazi. Then it’s fine.
The left largely painted Floyd as a flawed person who should not have been murdered in public over $20.
The right, as you have, continuously claim he got what he deserved. I suppose that instead of a speeding ticket you would accept a roadside killing of your wife or child – getting what they deserved.
What a dick
Since when is cardiac arrest from a lethal dose of fentanyl murder? If you haven’t been following Derek Chauvin appeals, Tampon Tim Walz and Sheik Keith Ellison failed to follow due process in their quest to appease a bunch of low life idiots, trampling Chauvins Constitutional rights. They circumvented a grand jury and Waltz improperly appointed Ellison to prosecute Chauvin, never legitimately charging him. After seeing the evidence of the autopsy and the lies of the political cronies to get a sacrificial conviction, I believe Chauvin will be released, as he should be.
I love how you forget all the details about Floyd, including his criminality and the true cause of death. It is nothing but willful blindness and sheer stupidity that leads you to say what you do. Keep supporting the idea of a great man in George Floyd who was a criminal: aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, multiple convictions for drug possession, theft, and criminal trespass left unhindered because the penalties weren’t sufficient due to PC.
May a gentleman like this, whom you say only stole $20, move next door to you.
You don’t remember it because you’re a fool.
George Floyd’s proximal cause of death was carbon monoxide poisoning, having been restrained on the street pavement with his head 12-15″ from the tailpipe of the police cruiser with the ICE engine left running the whole 1/2 hour. That is a an accidental death, but with contributory negligence on the part of the 4 police officers.
At the trial, the pulmonologist who testified for the State lied to the jury about whether CO could have been a causative factor, ignoring the blood-cleansing effect of the 1-hour of artificial respiration before the first blood sample was drawn at the hospital. On Floyd’s part, his resistance to being arrested for passing counterfeit money, and illegal drug use were other factors leading to the death.
Bull Sheeeit!
Like everything else you write, knowledge is absent, and the information is tainted by those who wish America dead. A person smarter than you would have looked at the toxicology report and the seriousness of his underlying diseases, noting that Floyd was a dead man walking.
If Floyd was a dead man walking, the cops should have waited for him to die on his own. Instead they smiled and laughed as they literally crushed the life out of him.
Please, please direct me to those sites. Facts.
Megan Kelly did a follow up on the autopsy results and how they were not fully disclosed at the railroading. That wasn’t a hearing, it was a lynching by the media and a bunch of political hacks.
… spend every waking moment mocking…
I’ve never met any of those people although I may be wrong I begin to think they don’t exist. Children sometimes create imaginary friends. Leftists create imaginary enemies to justify their incoherent rage and support their unearned self regard and sanctimony…
Look at the fury and rage in the faces of the hangdog conservatives who spend every waking moment mocking George Floyd and the people your ICE thugs shot.
NICE TRY u filthy lying pig.
Low IQ big A , keep defending the losers that drag our society down.
Too many people fascinated with politics–particularly on the Left–have demonstrated an eagerness to abandon principles, values, ethics and common sense that were once regarded as vital to our nation and political culture. This is a continuum of their rejection or corruption of those institutions (ie schools, churches, civic organizations) that were relied on to provide the foundation to foster the values that used to color our politics. Pike is exactly the sort of person our parents prayed we would never become.
Charlie Kirk On Antisemitism
Mr. Kirk was repeatedly accused of antisemitism, including by fellow conservatives.
He was a proponent of “replacement theory,” a once-fringe conspiracy theory positing that Jews are trying to replace white Americans with nonwhite immigrants. That ideology motivated the gunman who killed 11 worshipers at a Pittsburgh synagogue in 2018.
Mr. Kirk also accused Jewish philanthropists of fomenting anti-whiteness by supporting liberal antiracism causes like the Black Lives Matter movement.
“The philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country,” he said on his show in 2023.
Not long after, he accused Jews of controlling “not just the colleges — it’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-views-guns-gender-climate.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
Charlie Kirk On Climate Change
Mr. Kirk frequently dismissed concerns about climate change, even as polling showed that young conservative voters prioritize the issue. He said incorrectly that there was no scientific consensus on global warming.
He also rejected the idea that climate change posed an existential threat to humanity, describing it as “complete gibberish, nonsense and balderdash” in December 2024 to members of Turning Point UK, the British offshoot of Turning Point USA.
Last month, Mr. Kirk’s podcast featured Energy Secretary Chris Wright, who has called global warming “not incredibly important.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-views-guns-gender-climate.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
………………………………….
Kirk, a so-called ‘pro-lifer’ was not too concerned with droughts and wildfires.
Draughts are called Weather. Wild Fires are primarily caused by environmental mismanagement by left leaning govenrments.
Contra Smokey the bear very few forest fires are started by humans – nature starts the all the time.
Without human intervention – fires are frequent and relatively small, and burn themselves out quickly from lack of fuel.
Because humans STOP forest fires and because we STOP logging that would create fire breaks.
We all a huge buildup of massive areas that are highly flamable and now we get HUGE forest fires that cause the air in dozens of states to become unbreathable
It is the very same people who push the catastrophic Global Warming nonsense that are responsible for the idiotic public policy decisions that brought about huge fires.
As to Global Waring – while it is true that there is a consensus among climate scientists – a far left bunch to begin with that Man is making a small contribution to the very slow warming of the planet – science itself is NOT done by consensus – it is done by actual data.
Paul Romer – and top economist roved over a decade ago that any mathematical model that had sufficient number of variables could easily – and even subcosciously be tweaked to perfectly hid cast while meaning nothing about the future. Yet Climate models can not even correctly hindcast.
Regardless there is no are of science, economics or anything else that involves mathematical models with 1/1000th the complexity of climate models that tans a chance of being correct.
What prediction of the high priests of Warmendom has proven to be true ?
Then planet has been getting warmed for just under 300 years – since the bottom of the little ice age.
Since long before humans could conceivably have an effect.
That warming is objectively NATURAL. There has been no statistically significant change in that warming.
Humanity has NOT died from that worming – in fact we are doing better. We have used 1/2 as much farmland to feed twice as many people twice as well over the past 60 years. Some small part of that is due ot natural warming.
The current warming WILL END – tomorow, a month a decade a century – it is certain to end.
Regardless, you have lied to people for so long, that even though the majority of peole still beleive humans are causing warming
They also correctly do not see that warming as problematic
Finally, Real Science – Arrenhius, Stephan-Botzman, Plank tell us that if it took 100 years for humans to raise the earths temperature by 1C,
It will take 200 years to raise the earth temperature another 1C and 400 years to raise the temperature a 3rd degree.
That of course presumes that CO2 is a GHG of consequence.
Greenhouse gasses have been known since the late 1800s to trap (absorb) infra-red radiation. The most obvious of these to direct observation is water vapor. In a desert, the morning is colder after a clear-sky night compared to an overcast night — the cloud cover acts as a blanket keeping in warmth received on the ground during the daytime.
Methane is the next most important greenhouse gas, but its effect on warming cannot be directly perceived liking H20. Nonetheless, the effect can be seen with instrumentation.
The weakest of the three gasses is CO2, 1/80th the effect of methane per unit volume of gas. That said, the amount of each gas in the atmosphere is close to proportional to the gas’ concentration. Since 100 years ago, humans have roughly doubled CO2 concentration via fossil fuel burning.
The warming from CO2 is now amplifying the concentration of methane by thawing vast areas of tundra in Siberia. The deadwood buried in the tundra for thousands of years is now thawing and beginning to decay, which gives off methane gas. This created a positive feedback loop of warming temps–>methane release–>warming temps.
The major political issue is nobody knows the timeframe for permanent damage to Earth’s biosphere and atmosphere — almost all the argumentation comes down to how fast a response to AGW is optimal, know that too fast a response will cause avoidable economic harms.
Denying that anything need be done regarding polluting gasses is childlike escapism — it is an abdication of responsibility toward posterity. It would be more credible to admit that there is a problem to be solved, and narrow the disagreement over what to do in what timeframe.
Arrenhius, Stephan-Botzman, Plank said nothing of the kind.
The only thing that changed in the last few hundred years is the increase in burning of fossil fuels. When John Say claims the warming may stop and some cooling might occur – he’s right, but only because humans have stopped lighting everything on fire.
Neither you nor NYT are credible sources.
There are thousands of hours of video of Charlie Kirk telling us all what he beleived.
No one needs YOU or other Left Wing nuts to craft a narrative about Kirk.
The left accusing Kirk of anti-semitism is drowning in Irony. Have you listened to yourselves ?
There are thousands of hours of Charlie Kirk giving paid performances in response to patron demands. It only showed that Charlie believed in getting paid to say outrageous things.
Yeah NY slime.. The same paper who supported Stalin, as he murder his own people.
Total BS about lying about Charlie Kirk from a lowlife, lying piece of scumbagwormmeat. If you feel compelled to lie, may I suggest that you smash a hammer on your knuckles repeatedly until the compulsion passes.
Troll
Charlie Kirk was right and after he told a Jewish billionaire NO they not only cancelled him from further donations but– just a hypothesis here but a compelling one– their buddies in Israel arranged Charlie’s murder, with help from his own fake, compromised security team
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/charlie-kirk-faced-pressure-from-jewish-donors-before-his-death-says-conservative-us-commentator/3710218
If it can happen to Charlie it can happen to any of us., The time for silence is over. Speak up against Zionism before we all get exterminated like the 35,000 non-combattants killed in Gaza. Or however many it was !
Suddenly, Conservatives care about feelings again. Lol ok.
Conservatives care about out of control people – because they are dangerous.
That is FACT not feelings.
Conservatives *are* the out of control people. The only cure is lead.
We have more of it than you do.
And you use it mostly against schools.
Thank you for embodying JT’s article. You made his point better than anyone else.
Please keep posting. You are pure GOTV for any conservative or undecided voter to ensure a GOP victory.
You just proved PT point about rage and hate consuming leftists and parts of the Democrat party.
Wait, I’m confused. Who are the Nazis again? So hard to keep up.
Bill Lawrence,
Democrats.
They supported a guy who had a Nazi tattoo for like 17 years and it was only when a second, or was it a third, woman came forward with evidence of rape that Democrats suddenly “Believe all women!” again.
#. Piker is showing what fools your children are.
Why does Piker have 1st Amendment Rights but Alex Jones does not? His life was absolutely destroyed but Piker (not an American) gets to be far more extreme in his opinions and not have a $Billion+ judgment against him? What happened to equality under the law? Can’t Piker be sued like Alex Jones was?
Piker can be sued for defamation if he lapses into falsehoods rather than exaggerated accusations.
Go have you mom make you some pizza rolls.
#. Piker is demonstrating his point. His point is people cannot be free. Look at what I can get them to do. Self incriminating behavior.
It’s not new. They mocked Christ as he went through the street to be crucified. There’s nothing new under the sun.
The results are Mangione, Robinson, Karmelo, and thousands more. It teaches hatred. Piker is correct. 20% of the population can be lead into atrocities. 80% cannot be lead into hate.
When the quality of the demographics declines like it has in the USA that becomes true… Individual Liberty & Democracy are not compatible in the long run, but can last far longer when you have the kind of population the USA had pre-1965…
Estovir, you mean the ‘pre-civil rights era’?
Less of the Cohen puppet.
I beleive LC means pre the lefts war on reason and institutions
Regardless YOU chose to go for Civil Rights.
#. Can the Pied Piker create censorship in the US? He’s ignorant. These same anti-social personalities are in all branches of government including the SC. There was Ted Kocynski and Charles Manson before Piker arrived.
Tragic, tragedies but let’s meet the young lady with common sense and timeliness and instinctual self preservation to have sought help when stalked by Karmelo. 😢
Perhaps another look at Scotus cases …
A question? How can these people take the oath of office if they win when they are anti – Constitution? Don’t they take the oath to uphold the laws of this country? If that is so, and they do not, what are the stop measures? Do we actively endorse our own demise?
Excellent question that I also would like to know the answer
Charlie Kirk On Civil Rights
Mr. Kirk believed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a destructive force in American politics, calling its passage a “mistake” that he said has been turned into “an anti-white weapon.”
He also blamed the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. for the law and was highly critical of the slain civil rights leader, calling him an “awful” person. Mr. Kirk said he desired a colorblind society but blamed the veneration of Dr. King for what he saw as America’s fixation on race.
Mr. Kirk was also a staunch opponent of affirmative action and was highly critical of the Supreme Court justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, calling her a “diversity hire” who wasn’t qualified to serve on the highest court.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-views-guns-gender-climate.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
…………………………………..
Rightwing media has made every effort to portray Charlie Kirk as a ‘civil rights leader’. And here we have Kirk dissing M L King while trying to tell us the Civil rights movement was ‘destructive’.
You write those things as if Conservatives will not support Kirk’s opinions regarding Black Americans.
Those messages were the ones that Kirk’s patrons paid for him to say. A millionaire hired by billionaires to convince the middle and lower class to be minions to the oligarchs.
Not one event that Kirk was center of was in line with Christ’s teachings.
Christ judges what YOU do for your fellow man – not what Government does through theft at your demand.
Have YOU fed the starving ? Sheltered the homeless ? ….?
Unless you have done so PERSONALLY – you should not be judging others.
Yes – I have. But I don’t claim to be a Christian because of it.
There are provisions in the CRA that are unconstitutional.
That are quite literally Anti-Civil rights
Separately as a practical matter – as is quite common – the CRA was unnecescary.
Humans inherently prefer the familiar and close to the unfamiliar and distant.
We value out immediate family highest ahead of extended family, community, state, nation, and world
We value those who share our race, our religion, our values.
Every connection we have with another – brings us closer. The fewer connections we have the more distant we are and the less we trust people.
All of the above is human nature – and you can not overcome it with legislation.
Into the ovens with the Jews is what John Say would do.
“The fewer connections we have the more distant we are and the less we trust people.”
You are an illiterate idiot.
JS, you speak of human nature as if there were no such thing as socialization and higher-order reasoning skills — things that make the difference between pre-civilized mankind just barely surviving in tribes of 30-200 vs. a society like America with 340M working cooperatively to deliver a standard of living unprecedented in human history.
Dr. MLK Jr’s message resonates strongly with most conservatives because he argued for a post-racial meritocracy — which we are well on the way to achieving. Unfortunately, there were contemporaries who were black separatists (Farrakhan, Huey Newton, Angela Davis, Malcolm X), which devolved into reparations, DEA, defund the police, and other idiotic calls for special advantages based on skin color. MLK spent his final years working on behalf of Memphis Sanitation workers, and integrated workforce. I don’t know what Charlie Kirk didn’t like about MLK – did Charlie think hundreds of years of racial stereotyping were just going to spontaneously disappear overnight? Was he OK with keeping that kind of stereotyping going as “the natural state of mankind”? From the CK college speeches I heard, he was a post-racialist arguing for a color-blind meritocracy (to the extent each of us can develop a post-racial mindset and adhere to it even during conflicts and personal threat). That’s the final frontier in race relations — ignoring fear signals welling up from your amygdala having only to do with unfamiliarity fed by your eyeballs which will always see different ethnic appearances. The left hates post-racialism because it means denying special privileges that certain individuals have come to expect.
Again – there are thousands of hours of Kirk speeking for himself.
No one needs you to explain Kirk to them – he can do that perfectly well on his own.
Obviously, America has raised a country full of ghouls.
I think America is running out of chances to vote on mayhem in the streets. The mid terms are a sample test to see if these new democrats will disregard the customs and laws, and work with foreign assess to further undermine the country.
Once Trump is gone in ‘28, where does the rage go? No where. It is here to stay. We have a generation coming up that hates America and couldn’t care less what the end looks like.
The American Left is not restrained by any moral, ethical or legal barriers to the acquisition of power over our entire society. People who stand in their way are subject to personal destruction. Consider: in the 1950s, they destroyed Senator Joe McCarthy who was trying to uncover Communist perpetration of our government in the 30s and 40s. They probably stole the 1960 Presidential election from Nixon. They drove Richard Nixon from office after an election in which he had carried 49 states. They tried to impeach Ronald Reagan for selling arms to rebels in central America, even though intervention in the affairs of other countries is the heart of America foreign policy. Then they invented the greatest political hoax of all time – Trump-Putin collusion – to prevent Trump from defeating H. Clinton. After Trump did win, they started two impeachment proceedings against him. After Trump left office, they waged unrelenting Lawfare against him to prevent him from running again, including an effort to bar him from the ballot. When Trump overcame the Lawfare project, they turned up the volume on the daily comparisons of Trump to Hitler, in the hopes that some confused teenager would try to assist him. The same demonization was used against Supreme Court justices, two of whom have been threatened with assassination, and against Charlie Kirk who was assassinated.
Can anyone really identify any barrier that the American Left would hesitate to breach in order to destroy their opponents?
edwardmahl writes:
“The American Left is not restrained by any moral, ethical or legal barriers to the acquisition of power over our entire society. ”
Were that true there would be mass killings of conservatives. As that isn’t happening and it is conservatives who use ICE and the police to kill people, it appears edwardmahl is wrong.
You point out truths that should scare every American that believes in our democracy and constitution. The left Democrat Leadership has allowed their fringe radicals to be loud and proud that they now have created demon monsters in their tent. It’s feeling like they are losing their control of fringe radicals. Depending on how many of the radicals vote they could lose the party….. scary times ahead
Edward Mahl is Estovir, of course.
There is plenty of killing of conservatives – but less because in much of the country you have not yet fully destroyed the rule of law.
Luigi Mangione is going to jail for the rest of his life – if he avoids the death penalty. Tyler Robinson the same.
We have ample evidence of left wing violence but our institutions are still holding. Police still enforce the law, and violent conduct is punished.
About 6,000 Ice officers conducted about 1M arrests in 2025 2 citizens violating the law and less than 1 dozen total people violating the law were killed in encounters with ICE. During 2025 1M law enforcement officers conducted 7M total arrests and 1218 people were killed.
1 in ten of those by local and state police in california – that is tend times as many killings by CA police as by ICE in the entire country.
No ICE is not violent thugs – no group of people does their job perfectly. But ICE is performin their job about 1000 times more skillfully and professionally than the rest of law enforcement as a while.
If you do not like our immigration law – take it up with congress – NOT ICE.
Protest our immigration polices – with those who have the power to change those policies.
Not with those whose job is to enforce the law.
Law Enforcement generally is not perfect and never will be and those who actually violate the law should be punished.
But law enforcement is still a fundimental requirement for the rule of law.
ICE is successful because the people they are going after are hard working taxpayers who want a good life by doing a good job.
What is telling is that when an ICE agent kills people all the rest of ICE is OK with that – they all share the killer mentality.
Shooting an unarmed man in the back who is face down and covered with other agents is not skillful. It’s premeditated murder, but ICE is OK with that.
Wrong.
These are NOT hard working taxpayers, ICE continues to arrest ‘worst of the worst,’ including illegal alien convicted of murder in Minneapolis
https://alphanews.org/ice-continues-to-arrest-worst-of-the-worst-including-illegal-alien-convicted-of-murder-in-minneapolis/
it is conservatives who use ICE and the police to kill people
You are, most likley, a true genius. Thank you for the significant contributions you offer to each of us.
LAKEN RILEY
Laken Riley was a 22-year-old nursing student from Georgia who was tragically murdered on February 22, 2024, while out for a morning run on the University of Georgia campus.
It’s idiots like yourself that make us cheer abortions.